Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
7.9
5.0
Journals
Remote Sensing
Special Issues
Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II
remotesensing-logo
Submit to Remote Sensing Review for Remote Sensing Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292). This special issue belongs to the section "Atmospheric Remote Sensing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2020) | Viewed by 89411

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Silas Michaelides

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Cyprus Institute, 20 Konstantinou Kavafi Street 2121, AglantziaNicosia, Cyprus
Interests: meteorology; atmospheric remote sensing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Precipitation is a well-recognized pillar in the global water and energy balances. The accurate and timely understanding of its characteristics at the global, regional and local scales is indispensable for a clearer insight on the mechanisms underlying the Earth’s atmosphere-ocean complex system. Precipitation is one of the elements that is documented to be greatly affected by climate change.

In its various forms, precipitation comprises the primary source of freshwater which is vital for the sustainability of almost all human activities. Its socio-economic significance is fundamental in managing this natural resource effectively in applications ranging from irrigation to industrial and household usage.

Remote sensing of precipitation is pursued through a broad spectrum of continuously enriched and upgraded instrumentation, embracing sensors which can be ground-based (e.g., weather radars), satellite-borne (e.g., passive or active space-borne sensors), underwater (e.g., hydrophones), aerial, or ship-borne.

This Special Issue will host papers on all aspects of remote sensing of precipitation, including applications which embrace the use of remote sensing techniques of precipitation in tackling issues such as precipitation estimations and retrievals along with their methodologies and corresponding error assessment, precipitation modelling including validation, instrument comparison and calibration, understanding of cloud microphysical properties, precipitation downscaling, precipitation droplet size distribution, assimilation of remotely sensed precipitation into numerical weather prediction models, measurement of precipitable water vapor, etc. Also, papers on new technological advances as well as campaigns and missions on precipitation remote sensing (e.g., TRMM, GPM) are welcome.

Dr. Silas Michaelides
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Precipitation 
  • Weather radar 
  • Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) 
  • Underwater precipitation remote sensing 
  • Cloud microphysical properties 
  • TRMM and GPM

Published Papers (26 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

5 pages, 203 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial for Special Issue “Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II”
by Silas Michaelides
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(1), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010136 - 04 Jan 2021
Viewed by 1961
Abstract
The ongoing and intensive consideration by the scientific community of the many facets of precipitation science constitutes a broad recognition of the significance of this indispensable component of the hydrologic cycle [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

19 pages, 8727 KiB  
Article
Examining the Robustness of a Spatial Bootstrap Regional Approach for Radar-Based Hourly Precipitation Frequency Analysis
by Hisham Eldardiry and Emad Habib
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(22), 3767; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12223767 - 16 Nov 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1871
Abstract
Radar-based Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE) provide rainfall products with high temporal and spatial resolutions as opposed to sparse observations from rain gauges. Radar-based QPE’s have been widely used in many hydrological and meteorological applications; however, using these high-resolution products in the development of [...] Read more.
Radar-based Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE) provide rainfall products with high temporal and spatial resolutions as opposed to sparse observations from rain gauges. Radar-based QPE’s have been widely used in many hydrological and meteorological applications; however, using these high-resolution products in the development of Precipitation Frequency Estimates (PFE) is impeded by their typically short-record availability. The current study evaluates the robustness of a spatial bootstrap regional approach, in comparison to a pixel-based (i.e., at site) approach, to derive PFEs using hourly radar-based multi-sensor precipitation estimation (MPE) product over the state of Louisiana in the US. The spatial bootstrap sampling technique augments the local pixel sample by incorporating rainfall data from surrounding pixels with decreasing importance when distance increases. We modeled extreme hourly rainfall data based on annual maximum series (AMS) using the generalized extreme value statistical distribution. The results showed a reduction in the uncertainty bounds of the PFEs when using the regional spatial bootstrap approach compared to the pixel-based estimation, with an average reduction of 10% and 2% in the 2- and 5-year return periods, respectively. Using gauge-based PFE’s as a reference, the spatial bootstrap regional approach outperforms the pixel-based approach in terms of robustness to outliers identified in the radar-based AMS of some pixels. However, the systematic bias inherent to radar-based QPE especially for extreme rainfall cases, appear to cause considerable underestimation in PFEs in both the pixel-based and the regional approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 5780 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Global Precipitation Products over the Largest Agriculture Region in Pakistan
by Zain Nawaz, Xin Li, Yingying Chen, Naima Nawaz, Rabia Gull and Abdelrazek Elnashar
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(21), 3650; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12213650 - 06 Nov 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3479
Abstract
Spatial and temporal precipitation data acquisition is highly important for hydro-meteorological applications. Gridded precipitation products (GPPs) offer an opportunity to estimate precipitation at different time and resolution. Though, the products have numerous discrepancies that need to be evaluated against in-situ records. The present [...] Read more.
Spatial and temporal precipitation data acquisition is highly important for hydro-meteorological applications. Gridded precipitation products (GPPs) offer an opportunity to estimate precipitation at different time and resolution. Though, the products have numerous discrepancies that need to be evaluated against in-situ records. The present study is the first of its kind to highlight the performance evaluation of gauge based (GB) and satellite based (SB) GPPs at annual, winter, and summer monsoon scale by using multiple statistical approach during the period of 1979–2017 and 2003–2017, respectively. The result revealed that the temporal magnitude of all the GPPs was different and deviate up to 100–200 mm with overall spatial pattern of underestimation (GB product) and overestimation (SB product) from north to south gradient. The degree of accuracy of GB products with observed precipitation decreases with the increase in the magnitude of precipitation and vice versa for SB precipitation products. Furthermore, the observed precipitation revealed the positive trend with multiple turning points during the period 1979–2005. However, the gentle increase with no obvious break point has been detected during the period of 2005–2017. The large inter-annual variability and trends slope of the reference data series were well captured by Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) products and outperformed the relative GPPs in terms of higher R2 values of ≥ 0.90 and lower values of estimated RME ≤ 25% at annual and summer monsoon season. However, Climate Research Unit (CRU) performed better during winter estimates as compared with in-situ records. In view of significant error and discrepancies, regional correction factors for each GPPs were introduced that can be useful for future concerned projects over the study region. The study highlights the importance of evaluation by the careful selection of potential GPPs for the future hydro-climate studies over the similar regions like Punjab Province. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 6749 KiB  
Article
Weather Types Affect Rain Microstructure: Implications for Estimating Rain Rate
by Wael Ghada, Joan Bech, Nicole Estrella, Andreas Hamann and Annette Menzel
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(21), 3572; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12213572 - 31 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2024
Abstract
Quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) through remote sensing has to take rain microstructure into consideration, because it influences the relationship between radar reflectivity Z and rain intensity R. For this reason, separate equations are used to estimate rain intensity of convective and stratiform rain [...] Read more.
Quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) through remote sensing has to take rain microstructure into consideration, because it influences the relationship between radar reflectivity Z and rain intensity R. For this reason, separate equations are used to estimate rain intensity of convective and stratiform rain types. Here, we investigate whether incorporating synoptic scale meteorology could yield further QPE improvements. Depending on large-scale weather types, variability in cloud condensation nuclei and the humidity content may lead to variation in rain microstructure. In a case study for Bavaria, we measured rain microstructure at ten locations with laser-based disdrometers, covering a combined 18,600 h of rain in a period of 36 months. Rain was classified on a temporal scale of one minute into convective and stratiform based on a machine learning model. Large-scale wind direction classes were on a daily scale to represent the synoptic weather types. Significant variations in rain microstructure parameters were evident not only for rain types, but also for wind direction classes. The main contrast was observed between westerly and easterly circulations, with the latter characterized by smaller average size of drops and a higher average concentration. This led to substantial variation in the parameters of the radar rain intensity retrieval equation Z–R. The effect of wind direction on Z–R parameters was more pronounced for stratiform than convective rain types. We conclude that building separate Z–R retrieval equations for regional wind direction classes should improve radar-based QPE, especially for stratiform rain events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 3065 KiB  
Article
ST-CORAbico: A Spatiotemporal Object-Based Bias Correction Method for Storm Prediction Detected by Satellite
by Miguel Laverde-Barajas, Gerald A. Corzo, Ate Poortinga, Farrukh Chishtie, Chinaporn Meechaiya, Susantha Jayasinghe, Peeranan Towashiraporn, Amanda Markert, David Saah, Lam Hung Son, Sothea Khem, Surajate Boonya-Aroonnet, Winai Chaowiwat, Remko Uijlenhoet and Dimitri P. Solomatine
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(21), 3538; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12213538 - 28 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2588
Abstract
Advances in near real-time rainstorm prediction using remote sensing have offered important opportunities for effective disaster management. However, this information is subject to several sources of systematic errors that need to be corrected. Temporal and spatial characteristics of both satellite and in-situ data [...] Read more.
Advances in near real-time rainstorm prediction using remote sensing have offered important opportunities for effective disaster management. However, this information is subject to several sources of systematic errors that need to be corrected. Temporal and spatial characteristics of both satellite and in-situ data can be combined to enhance the quality of storm estimates. In this study, we present a spatiotemporal object-based method to bias correct two sources of systematic error in satellites: displacement and volume. The method, Spatiotemporal Contiguous Object-based Rainfall Analysis for Bias Correction (ST-CORAbico), uses the spatiotemporal rainfall analysis ST-CORA incorporated with a multivariate kernel density storm segmentation for describing the main storm event characteristics (duration, spatial extension, volume, maximum intensity, centroid). Displacement and volume are corrected by adjusting the spatiotemporal structure and the intensity distribution, respectively. ST-CORAbico was applied to correct the early version of the Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Mission (GPM-IMERG) over the Lower Mekong basin in Thailand during the monsoon season from 2014 to 2017. The performance of ST-CORABico is compared against the Distribution Transformation (DT) and Gamma Quantile Mapping (GQM) probabilistic methods. A total of 120 storm events identified over the study area were classified into short and long-lived storms by using a k-means cluster analysis method. Examples for both storm event types describe the error reduction due to location and magnitude by ST-CORAbico. The results showed that the displacement and magnitude correction made by ST-CORAbico considerably reduced RMSE and bias of GPM-IMERG. In both storm event types, this method showed a lower impact on the spatial correlation of the storm event. In comparison with DT and GQM, ST-CORAbico showed a superior performance, outperforming both approaches. This spatiotemporal bias correction method offers a new approach to enhance the accuracy of satellite-derived information for near real-time estimation of storm events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5838 KiB  
Article
Comparison of GPM IMERG and TRMM 3B43 Products over Cyprus
by Adrianos Retalis, Dimitris Katsanos, Filippos Tymvios and Silas Michaelides
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(19), 3212; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12193212 - 01 Oct 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 3208
Abstract
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) high-resolution product and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B43 product are validated against rain gauges over the island of Cyprus for the period from April 2014 to June 2018. The comparison performed is [...] Read more.
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) high-resolution product and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B43 product are validated against rain gauges over the island of Cyprus for the period from April 2014 to June 2018. The comparison performed is twofold: firstly, the Satellite Precipitation (SP) estimates are compared with the gauge stations’ records on a monthly basis and, secondly, on an annual basis. The validation is based on ground data from a dense and well-maintained network of rain gauges, available in high temporal (hourly) resolution. The results show high correlation coefficient values, on average reaching 0.92 and 0.91 for monthly 3B43 and IMERG estimates, respectively, although both IMERG and TRMM tend to underestimate precipitation (Bias values of −1.6 and −3.0, respectively), especially during the rainy season. On an annual basis, both SP estimates are underestimating precipitation, although IMERG estimates records (R = 0.82) are slightly closer to that of the corresponding gauge station records than those of 3B43 (R = 0.81). Finally, the influence of elevation of both SP estimates was considered by grouping rain gauge stations in three categories, with respect to their elevation. Results indicated that both SP estimates underestimate precipitation with increasing elevation and overestimate it at lower elevations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 9430 KiB  
Article
GPM-Based Multitemporal Weighted Precipitation Analysis Using GPM_IMERGDF Product and ASTER DEM in EDBF Algorithm
by Sana Ullah, Zhengkang Zuo, Feizhou Zhang, Jianghua Zheng, Shifeng Huang, Yi Lin, Imran Iqbal, Yiyuan Sun, Ming Yang and Lei Yan
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(19), 3162; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12193162 - 26 Sep 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2837
Abstract
To obtain the high-resolution multitemporal precipitation using spatial downscaling technique on a precipitation dataset may provide a better representation of the spatial variability of precipitation to be used for different purposes. In this research, a new downscaling methodology such as the global precipitation [...] Read more.
To obtain the high-resolution multitemporal precipitation using spatial downscaling technique on a precipitation dataset may provide a better representation of the spatial variability of precipitation to be used for different purposes. In this research, a new downscaling methodology such as the global precipitation mission (GPM)-based multitemporal weighted precipitation analysis (GMWPA) at 0.05° resolution is developed and applied in the humid region of Mainland China by employing the GPM dataset at 0.1° and the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) 30 m DEM-based geospatial predictors, i.e., elevation, longitude, and latitude in empirical distribution-based framework (EDBF) algorithm. The proposed methodology is a two-stepped process in which a scale-dependent regression analysis between each individual precipitation variable and the EDBF-based weighted precipitation with geospatial predictor(s), and to downscale the predicted multitemporal weighted precipitation at a refined scale is developed for the downscaling of GMWPA. While comparing results, it shows that the weighted precipitation outperformed all precipitation variables in terms of the coefficient of determination (R2) value, whereas they outperformed the annual precipitation variables and underperformed as compared to the seasonal and the monthly variables in terms of the calculated root mean square error (RMSE) value. Based on the achieved results, the weighted precipitation at the low-resolution (e.g., at 0.75° resolution) along-with the original resolution (e.g., at 0.1° resolution) is employed in the downscaling process to predict the average multitemporal precipitation, the annual total precipitation for the year 2001 and 2004, and the average annual precipitation (2001–2015) at 0.05° resolution, respectively. The downscaling approach resulting through proposed methodology captured the spatial patterns with greater accuracy at higher spatial resolution. This work showed that it is feasible to increase the spatial resolution of a precipitation variable(s) with greater accuracy on an annual basis or as an average from the multitemporal precipitation dataset using a geospatial predictor as the proxy of precipitation through the weighted precipitation in EDBF environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

26 pages, 3706 KiB  
Article
Capacity of Satellite-Based and Reanalysis Precipitation Products in Detecting Long-Term Trends across Mainland China
by Shanlei Sun, Wanrong Shi, Shujia Zhou, Rongfan Chai, Haishan Chen, Guojie Wang, Yang Zhou and Huayu Shen
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(18), 2902; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12182902 - 07 Sep 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2733
Abstract
Despite numerous assessments of satellite-based and reanalysis precipitation across the globe, few studies have been conducted based on the precipitation linear trend (LT), particularly during daytime and nighttime, when there are different precipitation mechanisms. Herein, we first examine LTs for the whole day [...] Read more.
Despite numerous assessments of satellite-based and reanalysis precipitation across the globe, few studies have been conducted based on the precipitation linear trend (LT), particularly during daytime and nighttime, when there are different precipitation mechanisms. Herein, we first examine LTs for the whole day (LTwd), daytime (LTd), and nighttime (LTn) over mainland China (MC) in 2003–2017, with sub-daily observations from a dense rain gauge network. For MC and ten Water Resources Regions (WRRs), annual and seasonal LTwd, LTd, and LTn were generally positive but with evident regional differences. Subsequently, annual and seasonal LTs derived from six satellite-based and six reanalysis popular precipitation products were evaluated using metrics of correlation coefficient (CC), bias, root-mean-square-error (RMSE), and sign accuracy. Finally, metric-based optimal products (OPs) were identified for MC and each WRR. Values of each metric for annual and seasonal LTwd, LTd, or LTn differ among products; meanwhile, for any single product, performance varied by season and time of day. Correspondingly, the metric-based OPs varied among regions and seasons, and between daytime and nighttime, but were mainly characterized by OPs of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B42, ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA)-Interim, and Modern Era Reanalysis for Research and Applications (MERRA)-2. In particular, the CC-based (RMSE-based) OPs in southern and northern WRRs were generally TRMM3B42 and MERRA-2, respectively. These findings imply that to investigate precipitation change and obtain robust related conclusions using precipitation products, comprehensive evaluations are necessary, due to variation in performance within one year, one day and among regions for different products. Additionally, our study facilitates a valuable reference for product users seeking reliable precipitation estimates to examine precipitation change across MC, and an insight (i.e., capacity in detecting LTs, including daytime and nighttime) for developers improving algorithms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 9884 KiB  
Article
Microphysical and Polarimetric Radar Signatures of an Epic Flood Event in Southern China
by Yu Ma, Haonan Chen, Guangheng Ni, V. Chandrasekar, Yabin Gou and Wenjuan Zhang
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(17), 2772; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12172772 - 26 Aug 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2374
Abstract
An extremely heavy rainfall event hit Guangdong province, China, from 27 August to 1 September 2018. There were two different extreme rain regions, respectively, at the Pearl River estuary and eastern Guangdong, and a record-breaking daily precipitation of 1056.7 mm was observed at [...] Read more.
An extremely heavy rainfall event hit Guangdong province, China, from 27 August to 1 September 2018. There were two different extreme rain regions, respectively, at the Pearl River estuary and eastern Guangdong, and a record-breaking daily precipitation of 1056.7 mm was observed at Gaotan station on 30 August. This paper utilizes a suite of observations from soundings, a gauge network, disdrometers, and polarimetric radars to gain insights to the two rainfall centers. The large-scale meteorological forcing, rainfall patterns, and microphysical processes, as well as radar-based precipitation signatures are investigated. It is concluded that a west-moving monsoon depression played a critical role in sustaining the moisture supply to the two extreme rain regions, and the combined orographic enhancement further contributed to the torrential rainfall over Gaotan station. The raindrop size distributions (DSD) observed at Zhuhai and Huidong stations, as well as the observed polarimetric radar signatures indicate that the rainfall at Doumen region was characterized by larger raindrops but a lower number concentration compared with that at Gaotan region. In addition, the dual-polarization radars are used to quantify precipitation intensity during this extreme event, providing timely information for flood warning and emergency management decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 10832 KiB  
Article
Regional Precipitation Model Based on Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Kriging
by Wei Zhang, Dan Liu, Shengjie Zheng, Shuya Liu, Hugo A. Loáiciga and Wenkai Li
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(16), 2547; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12162547 - 07 Aug 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3420
Abstract
High-resolution precipitation field has been widely used in hydrological and meteorological modeling. This paper establishes the spatial and temporal distribution model of precipitation in Hubei Province from 2006 through 2014, based on the data of 75 meteorological stations. This paper applies a geographically [...] Read more.
High-resolution precipitation field has been widely used in hydrological and meteorological modeling. This paper establishes the spatial and temporal distribution model of precipitation in Hubei Province from 2006 through 2014, based on the data of 75 meteorological stations. This paper applies a geographically and temporally weighted regression kriging (GTWRK) model to precipitation and assesses the effects of timescales and a time-weighted function on precipitation interpolation. This work’s results indicate that: (1) the optimal timescale of the geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) precipitation model is daily. The fitting accuracy is improved when the timescale is converted from months and years to days. The average mean absolute error (MAE), mean relative error (MRE), and the root mean square error (RMSE) decrease with scaling from monthly to daily time steps by 36%, 56%, and 35%, respectively, and the same statistical indexes decrease by 13%, 15%, and 14%, respectively, when scaling from annual to daily steps; (2) the time weight function based on an exponential function improves the predictive skill of the GTWR model by 3% when compared to geographically weighted regression (GWR) using a monthly time step; and (3) the GTWRK has the highest accuracy, and improves the MAE, MRE and RMSE by 3%, 10% and 1% with respect to monthly precipitation predictions, respectively, and by 3%, 10% and 5% concerning annual precipitation predictions, respectively, compared with the GWR results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4871 KiB  
Article
RAINBOW: An Operational Oriented Combined IR-Algorithm
by Leo Pio D’Adderio, Silvia Puca, Gianfranco Vulpiani, Marco Petracca, Paolo Sanò and Stefano Dietrich
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(15), 2444; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12152444 - 30 Jul 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2650
Abstract
In this paper, precipitation estimates derived from the Italian ground radar network (IT GR) are used in conjunction with Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI) measurements to develop an operational oriented algorithm (RAdar INfrared Blending algorithm for Operational Weather monitoring (RAINBOW)) able [...] Read more.
In this paper, precipitation estimates derived from the Italian ground radar network (IT GR) are used in conjunction with Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI) measurements to develop an operational oriented algorithm (RAdar INfrared Blending algorithm for Operational Weather monitoring (RAINBOW)) able to provide precipitation pattern and intensity. The algorithm evaluates surface precipitation over five geographical boxes (in which the study area is divided). It is composed of two main modules that exploit a second-degree polynomial relationship between the SEVIRI brightness temperature at 10.8 µm TB10.8 and the precipitation rate estimates from IT GR. These relationships are applied to each acquisition of SEVIRI in order to provide a surface precipitation map. The results, based on a number of case studies, show good performance of RAINBOW when it is compared with ground reference (precipitation rate map from interpolated rain gauge measurements), with high Probability of Detection (POD) and low False Alarm Ratio (FAR) values, especially for light to moderate precipitation range. At the same time, the mean error (ME) values are about 0 mmh−1, while root mean square error (RMSE) is about 2 mmh−1, highlighting a limited variability of the RAINBOW estimations. The precipitation retrievals from RAINBOW have been also compared with the European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) Satellite Application Facility on Support to Operational Hydrology and Water Management (H SAF) official microwave (MW)/infrared (IR) combined product (P-IN-SEVIRI). RAINBOW shows better performances than P-IN-SEVIRI, in terms of both detection and estimates of precipitation fields when they are compared to the ground reference. RAINBOW has been designed as an operational product, to provide complementary information to that of the national radar network where the IT GR coverage is absent, or the quality (expressed in terms of Quality Index (QI)) of the RAINBOW estimates is low. The aim of RAINBOW is to complement the radar and rain gauge network supporting the operational precipitation monitoring. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 5835 KiB  
Article
Hydrometeor Distribution and Linear Depolarization Ratio in Thunderstorms
by Zbyněk Sokol, Jana Minářová and Ondřej Fišer
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(13), 2144; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12132144 - 03 Jul 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2801
Abstract
The distribution of hydrometeors in thunderstorms is still under investigation as well as the process of electrification in thunderclouds leading to lightning discharges. One indicator of cloud electrification might be high values of the Linear Depolarization Ratio (LDR) at higher vertical levels. This [...] Read more.
The distribution of hydrometeors in thunderstorms is still under investigation as well as the process of electrification in thunderclouds leading to lightning discharges. One indicator of cloud electrification might be high values of the Linear Depolarization Ratio (LDR) at higher vertical levels. This study focuses on LDR values derived from vertically pointing cloud radars and the distribution of five hydrometeor species during 38 days with thunderstorms which occurred in 2018 and 2019 in Central Europe, close to our radar site. The study shows improved algorithms for de-aliasing, the derivation of vertical air velocity and the classification of hydrometeors in clouds using radar data. The comparison of vertical profiles with observed lightning discharges in the vicinity of the radar site (≤1 km) suggested that cloud radar data can indirectly identify “lightning” areas by high LDR values observed at higher gates due to the alignment of ice crystals, likely because of an intensified electric field in thunderclouds. Simultaneously, the results indicated that at higher gates, there is a mixture of several hydrometeor species, which suggests a well-known electrification process by collisions of hydrometeors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 8508 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of GPM-Era Satellite Precipitation Products on the Southern Slopes of the Central Himalayas Against Rain Gauge Data
by Shankar Sharma, Yingying Chen, Xu Zhou, Kun Yang, Xin Li, Xiaolei Niu, Xin Hu and Nitesh Khadka
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(11), 1836; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12111836 - 05 Jun 2020
Cited by 57 | Viewed by 4551
Abstract
The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission provides high-resolution precipitation estimates globally. However, their accuracy needs to be accessed for algorithm enhancement and hydro-meteorological applications. This study applies data from 388 gauges in Nepal to evaluate the spatial-temporal patterns presented in recently-developed GPM-Era satellite-based [...] Read more.
The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission provides high-resolution precipitation estimates globally. However, their accuracy needs to be accessed for algorithm enhancement and hydro-meteorological applications. This study applies data from 388 gauges in Nepal to evaluate the spatial-temporal patterns presented in recently-developed GPM-Era satellite-based precipitation (SBP) products, i.e., the Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), satellite-only (IMERG-UC), the gauge-calibrated IMERG (IMERG-C), the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP), satellite-only (GSMaP-MVK), and the gauge-calibrated GSMaP (GSMaP-Gauge). The main results are as follows: (1) GSMaP-Gauge datasets is more reasonable to represent the observed spatial distribution of precipitation, followed by IMERG-UC, GSMaP-MVK, and IMERG-C. (2) The gauge-calibrated datasets are more consistent (in terms of relative root mean square error (RRMSE) and correlation coefficient (R)) than the satellite-only datasets in representing the seasonal dynamic range of precipitation. However, all four datasets can reproduce the seasonal cycle of precipitation, which is predominately governed by the monsoon system. (3) Although all four SBP products underestimate the monsoonal precipitation, the gauge-calibrated IMERG-C yields smaller mean bias than GSMaP-Gauge, while GSMaP-Gauge shows the smaller RRMSE and higher R-value; indicating IMERG-C is more reliable to estimate precipitation amount than GSMaP-Gauge, whereas GSMaP-Gauge presents more reasonable spatial distribution than IMERG-C. Only IMERG-C moderately reproduces the evident elevation-dependent pattern of precipitation revealed by gauge observations, i.e., gradually increasing with elevation up to 2000 m and then decreasing; while GSMaP-Gauge performs much better in representing the gauge observed spatial pattern than others. (4) The GSMaP-Gauge calibrated based on the daily gauge analysis is more consistent with detecting gauge observed precipitation events among the four datasets. The high-intensity related precipitation extremes (95th percentile) are more intense in regions with an elevation below 2500 m; all four SBP datasets have low accuracy (<30%) and mostly underestimated (by >40%) the frequency of extreme events at most of the stations across the country. This work represents the quantification of the new-generation SBP products on the southern slopes of the central Himalayas in Nepal. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 3122 KiB  
Article
High Quality Zenith Tropospheric Delay Estimation Using a Low-Cost Dual-Frequency Receiver and Relative Antenna Calibration
by Andreas Krietemeyer, Hans van der Marel, Nick van de Giesen and Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(9), 1393; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12091393 - 28 Apr 2020
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 5457
Abstract
The recent release of consumer-grade dual-frequency receivers sparked scientific interest into use of these cost-efficient devices for high precision positioning and tropospheric delay estimations. Previous analyses with low-cost single-frequency receivers showed promising results for the estimation of Zenith Tropospheric Delays (ZTDs). However, their [...] Read more.
The recent release of consumer-grade dual-frequency receivers sparked scientific interest into use of these cost-efficient devices for high precision positioning and tropospheric delay estimations. Previous analyses with low-cost single-frequency receivers showed promising results for the estimation of Zenith Tropospheric Delays (ZTDs). However, their application is limited by the need to account for the ionospheric delay. In this paper we investigate the potential of a low-cost dual-frequency receiver (U-blox ZED-F9P) in combination with a range of different quality antennas. We show that the receiver itself is very well capable of achieving high-quality ZTD estimations. The limiting factor is the quality of the receiving antenna. To improve the applicability of mass-market antennas, a relative antenna calibration is performed, and new absolute Antenna Exchange Format (ANTEX) entries are created using a geodetic antenna as base. The performance of ZTD estimation with the tested antennas is evaluated, with and without antenna Phase Center Variation (PCV) corrections, using Precise Point Positioning (PPP). Without applying PCVs for the low-cost antennas, the Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of the estimated ZTDs are between 15 mm and 24 mm. Using the newly generated PCVs, the RMSE is reduced significantly to about 4 mm, a level that is excellent for meteorological applications. The standard U-blox ANN-MB-00 patch antenna, with a circular ground plane, after correcting the phase pattern yields comparable results (0.47 mm bias and 4.02 mm RMSE) to those from geodetic quality antennas, providing an all-round low-cost solution. The relative antenna calibration method presented in this paper opens the way for wide-spread application of low-cost receiver and antennas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

30 pages, 11025 KiB  
Article
Nine-Year Systematic Evaluation of the GPM and TRMM Precipitation Products in the Shuaishui River Basin in East-Central China
by Xiaoying Yang, Yang Lu, Mou Leong Tan, Xiaogang Li, Guoqing Wang and Ruimin He
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(6), 1042; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12061042 - 24 Mar 2020
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 3103
Abstract
Owing to their advantages of wide coverage and high spatiotemporal resolution, satellite precipitation products (SPPs) have been increasingly used as surrogates for traditional ground observations. In this study, we have evaluated the accuracy of the latest five GPM IMERG V6 and TRMM 3B42 [...] Read more.
Owing to their advantages of wide coverage and high spatiotemporal resolution, satellite precipitation products (SPPs) have been increasingly used as surrogates for traditional ground observations. In this study, we have evaluated the accuracy of the latest five GPM IMERG V6 and TRMM 3B42 V7 precipitation products across the monthly, daily, and hourly scale in the hilly Shuaishui River Basin in East-Central China. For evaluation, a total of four continuous and three categorical metrics have been calculated based on SPP estimates and historical rainfall records at 13 stations over a period of 9 years from 2009 to 2017. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple posterior comparison tests are used to assess the significance of the difference in SPP rainfall estimates. Our evaluation results have revealed a wide-ranging performance among the SPPs in estimating rainfall at different time scales. Firstly, two post-time SPPs (IMERG_F and 3B42) perform considerably better in estimating monthly rainfall. Secondly, with IMERG_F performing the best, the GPM products generally produce better daily rainfall estimates than the TRMM products. Thirdly, with their correlation coefficients all falling below 0.6, neither GPM nor TRMM products could estimate hourly rainfall satisfactorily. In addition, topography tends to impose similar impact on the performance of SPPs across different time scales, with more estimation deviations at high altitude. In general, the post-time IMERG_F product may be considered as a reliable data source of monthly or daily rainfall in the study region. Effective bias-correction algorithms incorporating ground rainfall observations, however, are needed to further improve the hourly rainfall estimates of the SPPs to ensure the validity of their usage in real-world applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 7523 KiB  
Article
The Development of a Two-Step Merging and Downscaling Method for Satellite Precipitation Products
by Xinyu Lu, Guoqiang Tang, Xiuqin Wang, Yan Liu, Ming Wei and Yingxin Zhang
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(3), 398; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12030398 - 26 Jan 2020
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 3094
Abstract
Low accuracy and coarse spatial resolution are the two main drawbacks of satellite precipitation products. Therefore, calibration and downscaling are necessary before these products are applied. This study proposes a two-step framework to improve the accuracy of satellite precipitation estimates. The first step [...] Read more.
Low accuracy and coarse spatial resolution are the two main drawbacks of satellite precipitation products. Therefore, calibration and downscaling are necessary before these products are applied. This study proposes a two-step framework to improve the accuracy of satellite precipitation estimates. The first step is data merging based on optimum interpolation (OI), and the second step is downscaling based on geographically weighted regression (GWR); therefore, the framework is called OI-GWR. An Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) (IMERG) product is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of OI-GWR in the Tianshan Mountains, China. First, the original IMERG precipitation data (OIMERG) are merged with rain gauge data using the OI method to produce corrected IMERG precipitation data (CIMERG). Then, using CIMERG as the first guess and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as the auxiliary variable, GWR is utilized for spatial downscaling. The two-step OI-GWR method is compared with several traditional methods, including GWR downscaling (Ori_GWR) and spline interpolation. The cross-validation results show that (1) the OI method noticeably improves the accuracy of OIMERG, and (2) the 1-km downscaled data obtained using OI-GWR are much better than those obtained from Ori_GWR, spline interpolation, and OIMERG. The proposed OI-GWR method can contribute to the development of high-resolution and high-accuracy regional precipitation datasets. However, it should be noted that the method proposed in this study cannot be applied in regions without any meteorological stations. In addition, further efforts will be needed to achieve daily- or hourly-scale downscaling of precipitation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 24188 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Impact of GNSS ZTD Data Assimilation into the WRF Modeling System during High-Impact Rainfall Events over Greece
by Christos Giannaros, Vassiliki Kotroni, Konstantinos Lagouvardos, Theodore M. Giannaros and Christos Pikridas
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(3), 383; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12030383 - 25 Jan 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4061
Abstract
The derivation of global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) tropospheric products is nowadays a state-of-the-art technique that serves both research and operational needs in a broad range of applications in meteorology. In particular, GNSS zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) data assimilation is widely applied in [...] Read more.
The derivation of global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) tropospheric products is nowadays a state-of-the-art technique that serves both research and operational needs in a broad range of applications in meteorology. In particular, GNSS zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) data assimilation is widely applied in Europe to enhance numerical weather predictions (NWPs). The current study presents the first attempt at introducing assimilation of ZTDs, derived from more than 48 stations of the Hellenic GNSS network, into the operational NWP system of the National Observatory of Athens (NOA) in Greece, which is based on the mesoscale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. WRF was applied during seven high-impact precipitation events covering the dry and wet season of 2018. The simulation employing the ZTD data assimilation reproduces more accurately, compared to the control experiment, the observed heavy rainfall (especially for high precipitation events, exceeding 20 mm in 24h) during both dry and wet periods. Assimilating ZTDs also improves the simulation of intense (>20 mm) convective precipitation during the time window of its occurrence in the dry season, and provides a beneficial influence during synoptic-scale events in the wet period. The above results, which are statistically significant, highlight an important positive impact of ZTD assimilation on the model’s precipitation forecast skill over Greece. Overall, the modelling system’s configuration, including the assimilation of ZTD observations, satisfactorily captures the spatial and temporal distribution of the observed rainfall and can therefore be used as the basis for examining further improvements in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 5476 KiB  
Article
Evaluation and Application of Satellite Precipitation Products in Studying the Summer Precipitation Variations over Taiwan
by Wan-Ru Huang, Pin-Yi Liu, Ya-Hui Chang and Chian-Yi Liu
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(3), 347; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12030347 - 21 Jan 2020
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 3576
Abstract
In March 2019, Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG)-Final v6 (hereafter IMERG6) was released, with data concerning precipitation dating back to June 2000. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has suggested that researchers use IMERG6 to replace the frequently used [...] Read more.
In March 2019, Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG)-Final v6 (hereafter IMERG6) was released, with data concerning precipitation dating back to June 2000. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has suggested that researchers use IMERG6 to replace the frequently used Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)-3B42 v7 (hereafter TRMM7), which is expected to cease operation in December 2019. This study aims to evaluate the performance of IMERG6 and TRMM7 in depicting the variations of summer (June, July, and August) precipitation over Taiwan during the period 2000–2017. Data used for the comparison also includes IMERG-Final v5 (hereafter IMERG5) and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation for Global Precipitation Measurement (GSMaP)-Gauge v7 (hereafter GSMaP7) during the summers of 2014–2017. Capabilities to apply the four satellite precipitation products (SPPs) in studying summer connective afternoon rainfall (CAR) events, which are the most frequently observed weather patterns in Taiwan, are also examined. Our analyses show that when using more than 400 local rain-gauge observations as a reference base for comparison, IMERG6 outperforms TRMM7 quantitatively and qualitatively, more accurately depicting the variations of the summer precipitation over Taiwan at multiple timescales (including mean status, daily, interannual, and diurnal). IMERG6 also performs better than TRMM7 in capturing the characteristics of CAR activities in Taiwan. These findings highlight that using IMERG6 to replace TRMM7 adds value in studying the spatial-temporal variations of summer precipitation over Taiwan. Furthermore, the analyses also indicated that IMERG6 outperforms IMERG5 and GSMaP7 in the examination of most of the features of summer precipitation over Taiwan during 2014–2017. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 6916 KiB  
Article
Seasonal Characteristics of Disdrometer-Observed Raindrop Size Distributions and Their Applications on Radar Calibration and Erosion Mechanism in a Semi-Arid Area of China
by Zongxu Xie, Hanbo Yang, Huafang Lv and Qingfang Hu
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(2), 262; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12020262 - 12 Jan 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2668
Abstract
Raindrop size distributions (DSDs) are the microphysical characteristics of raindrop spectra. Rainfall characterization is important to: (1) provide information on extreme rate, thus, it has an impact on rainfall related hazard; (2) provide data for indirect observation, model and forecast; (3) calibrate and [...] Read more.
Raindrop size distributions (DSDs) are the microphysical characteristics of raindrop spectra. Rainfall characterization is important to: (1) provide information on extreme rate, thus, it has an impact on rainfall related hazard; (2) provide data for indirect observation, model and forecast; (3) calibrate and validate the parameters in radar reflectivity-rainfall intensity (Z-R) relationships (quantitative estimate precipitation, QPE) and the mechanism of precipitation erosivity. In this study, the one-year datasets of raindrop spectra were measured by an OTT Parsivel-2 Disdrometer placed in Yulin, Shaanxi Province, China. At the same time, four TE525MM Gauges were also used in the same location to check the disdrometer-measured rainfall data. The theoretical formula of raindrop kinetic energy-rainfall intensity (KE-R) relationships was derived based on the DSDs to characterize the impact of precipitation characteristics and environmental conditions on KE-R relationships in semi-arid areas. In addition, seasonal rainfall intensity curves observed by the disdrometer of the area with application to erosion were characterized and estimated. The results showed that after quality control (QC), the frequencies of raindrop spectra data in different seasons varied, and rainfalls with R within 0.5–5 mm/h accounted for the largest proportion of rainfalls in each season. The parameters in Z-R relationships (Z = aRb) were different for rainfall events of different seasons (a varies from 78.3–119.0, and b from 1.8–2.1), and the calculated KE-R relationships satisfied the form of power function KE = ARm, in which A and m are parameters derived from rainfall shape factor μ. The sensitivity analysis of parameter A with μ demonstrated the applicability of the KE-R formula to different precipitation processes in the Yulin area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 5950 KiB  
Article
A Preliminary Assessment of the Gauge-Adjusted Near-Real-Time GSMaP Precipitation Estimate over Mainland China
by Dekai Lu and Bin Yong
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(1), 141; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12010141 - 01 Jan 2020
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 2799
Abstract
The near-real-time satellite-derived precipitation estimates are attractive for a wide range of applications like extreme precipitation monitoring and natural hazard warning. Recently, a gauge-adjusted near-real-time GSMaP precipitation estimate (GSMaP_Gauge_NRT) was produced to improve the quality of the original GSMaP_NRT. In this study, efforts [...] Read more.
The near-real-time satellite-derived precipitation estimates are attractive for a wide range of applications like extreme precipitation monitoring and natural hazard warning. Recently, a gauge-adjusted near-real-time GSMaP precipitation estimate (GSMaP_Gauge_NRT) was produced to improve the quality of the original GSMaP_NRT. In this study, efforts were taken to investigate and validate the performance of the GSMaP_Gauge_NRT using gauge observations over Mainland China. The analyses indicated that GSMaP_NRT generally overestimated the gauge precipitation in China. After calibration, the GSMaP_Gauge_NRT effectively reduced this bias and was more consistent with gauge observations. Results also showed that the correction scheme of GSMaP_Gauge_NRT mainly acted on hit events and could hardly make up the miss events of the satellite precipitation estimates. Finally, we extended the evaluation to the global scale for a broader view of GSMaP_Gauge_NRT. The global comparisons exhibited that the GSMaP_Gauge_NRT was in good agreement with the GSMaP_Gauge product. In conclusion, the GSMaP_Gauge_NRT had better performance than the GSMaP_NRT and was a more reliable near-real-time satellite precipitation product. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 25926 KiB  
Article
Ground Validation of GPM IMERG Precipitation Products over Iran
by Fatemeh Fadia Maghsood, Hossein Hashemi, Seyyed Hasan Hosseini and Ronny Berndtsson
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(1), 48; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12010048 - 20 Dec 2019
Cited by 52 | Viewed by 5305
Abstract
Accurate estimation of precipitation is crucial for fundamental input to various hydrometeorological applications. Ground-based precipitation data suffer limitations associated with spatial resolution and coverage; hence, satellite precipitation products can be used to complement traditional rain gauge systems. However, the satellite precipitation data need [...] Read more.
Accurate estimation of precipitation is crucial for fundamental input to various hydrometeorological applications. Ground-based precipitation data suffer limitations associated with spatial resolution and coverage; hence, satellite precipitation products can be used to complement traditional rain gauge systems. However, the satellite precipitation data need to be validated before extensive use in the applications. Hence, we conducted a thorough validation of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals (IMERG) product for all of Iran. The study focused on investigating the performance of daily and monthly GPM IMERG (early, late, final, and monthly) products by comparing them with ground-based precipitation data at synoptic stations throughout the country (2014–2017). The spatial and temporal performance of the GPM IMERG was evaluated using eight statistical criteria considering the rainfall index at the country level. The rainfall detection ability index (POD) showed that the best IMERG product’s performance is for the spring season while the false alarm ratio (FAR) index indicated the inferior performance of the IMERG products for the summer season. The performance of the products generally increased from IMERG-Early to –Final according to the relative bias (rBIAS) results while, based on the quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots, the IMERG-Final could not be suggested for the applications relying on extreme rainfall estimates compared to IMERG-Early and -Late. The results in this paper improve the understanding of IMERG product’s performance and open a door to future studies regarding hydrometeorological applications of these products in Iran. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 4736 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Precipitation Estimation from the NWP Models and Satellite Products for the Spring 2019 Severe Floods in Iran
by Saleh Aminyavari, Bahram Saghafian and Ehsan Sharifi
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(23), 2741; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11232741 - 21 Nov 2019
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 2968
Abstract
Precipitation monitoring and early warning systems are required to reduce negative flood impacts. In this study, the performance of ensemble precipitation forecasts of three numerical weather prediction (NWP) models within the THORPEX interactive grand global ensemble (TIGGE) as well as the integrated multi-satellite [...] Read more.
Precipitation monitoring and early warning systems are required to reduce negative flood impacts. In this study, the performance of ensemble precipitation forecasts of three numerical weather prediction (NWP) models within the THORPEX interactive grand global ensemble (TIGGE) as well as the integrated multi-satellite retrievals for global precipitation measurement (GPM), namely IMERG, for precipitation estimates were evaluated in recent severe floods in Iran over the March–April 2019 period. The evaluations were conducted in three aspects: spatial distribution of precipitation, mean areal precipitation in three major basins hard hit by the floods, and the dichotomous evaluation in four precipitation thresholds (25, 50, 75, and 100 mm per day). The results showed that the United Kingdom Met Office (UKMO) model, in terms of spatial coverage and satellite estimates as well as the precipitation amount, were closer to the observations. Moreover, with regard to mean precipitation at the basin scale, UKMO and European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) models in the Gorganrud Basin, ECMWF in the Karkheh Basin and UKMO in the Karun Basin performed better than others in flood forecasting. The National Centers for Environmental Forecast (NCEP) model performed well at low precipitation thresholds, while at high thresholds, its performance decreased significantly. On the contrary, the accuracy of IMERG improved when the precipitation threshold increased. The UKMO had better forecasts than the other models at the 100 mm/day precipitation threshold, whereas the ECMWF had acceptable forecasts in all thresholds and was able to forecast precipitation events with a lower false alarm ratio and better detection when compared to other models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 9564 KiB  
Article
Correcting Position Error in Precipitation Data Using Image Morphing
by Camille Le Coz, Arnold Heemink, Martin Verlaan, Marie-claire ten Veldhuis and Nick van de Giesen
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(21), 2557; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11212557 - 31 Oct 2019
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3472
Abstract
Rainfall estimates based on satellite data are subject to errors in the position of the rainfall events in addition to errors in their intensity. This is especially true for localized rainfall events such as the convective rainstorms that occur during the monsoon season [...] Read more.
Rainfall estimates based on satellite data are subject to errors in the position of the rainfall events in addition to errors in their intensity. This is especially true for localized rainfall events such as the convective rainstorms that occur during the monsoon season in sub-Saharan Africa. Many satellite-based estimates use gauge information for bias correction. However, bias adjustment methods do not correct the position errors explicitly. We propose to gauge-adjust satellite-based estimates with respect to the position using a morphing method. Image morphing transforms an image, in our case a rainfall field, into another one, by applying a spatial transformation. A benefit of this approach is that it can take both the position and the intensity of a rain event into account. Its potential is investigated with two case studies. In the first case, the rain events are synthetic, represented by elliptic shapes, while the second case uses real data from a rainfall event occurring during the monsoon season in southern Ghana. In the second case, the satellite-based estimate IMERG-Late (Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for GPM ) is adjusted to gauge data from the Trans-African Hydro-Meteorological Observatory (TAHMO) network. The results show that the position errors can be corrected, while preserving the higher spatial variability of the satellite-based estimate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 4847 KiB  
Article
Performance Assessment of SM2RAIN-CCI and SM2RAIN-ASCAT Precipitation Products over Pakistan
by Khalil Ur Rahman, Songhao Shang, Muhammad Shahid and Yeqiang Wen
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(17), 2040; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11172040 - 29 Aug 2019
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 3930
Abstract
Accurate estimation of precipitation from satellite precipitation products (PPs) over the complex topography and diverse climate of Pakistan with limited rain gauges (RGs) is an arduous task. In the current study, we assessed the performance of two PPs estimated from soil moisture (SM) [...] Read more.
Accurate estimation of precipitation from satellite precipitation products (PPs) over the complex topography and diverse climate of Pakistan with limited rain gauges (RGs) is an arduous task. In the current study, we assessed the performance of two PPs estimated from soil moisture (SM) using the SM2RAIN algorithm, SM2RAIN-CCI and SM2RAIN-ASCAT, on the daily scale across Pakistan during the periods 2000–2015 and 2007–2015, respectively. Several statistical metrics, i.e., Bias, unbiased root mean square error (ubRMSE), Theil’s U, and the modified Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) score, and four categorical metrics, i.e., probability of detection (POD), false alarm ratio (FAR), critical success index (CSI), and Bias score, were used to evaluate these two PPs against 102 RGs observations across four distinct climate regions, i.e., glacial, humid, arid and hyper-arid regions. Total mean square error (MSE) is decomposed into systematic (MSEs) and random (MSEr) error components. Moreover, the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission Multi-Satellite Precipitation Analysis (TRMM TMPA 3B42v7) was used to assess the performance of SM2RAIN-based products at 0.25° scale during 2007–2015. Results shows that SM2RAIN-based product highly underestimated precipitation in north-east and hydraulically developed areas of the humid region. Maximum underestimation for SM2RAIN-CCI and SM2RIAN-ASCAT were 58.04% and 42.36%, respectively. Precipitation was also underestimated in mountainous areas of glacial and humid regions with maximum underestimations of 43.16% and 34.60% for SM2RAIN-CCI. Precipitation was overestimated along the coast of Arabian Sea in the hyper-arid region with maximum overestimations for SM2RAIN-CCI (SM2RAIN-ASCAT) of 59.59% (52.35%). Higher ubRMSE was observed in the vicinity of hydraulically developed areas. Theil’s U depicted higher accuracy in the arid region with values of 0.23 (SM2RAIN-CCI) and 0.15 (SM2RAIN-ASCAT). Systematic error components have larger contribution than random error components. Overall, SM2RAIN-ASCAT dominates SM2RAIN-CCI across all climate regions, with average percentage improvements in bias (27.01% in humid, 5.94% in arid, and 6.05% in hyper-arid), ubRMSE (19.61% in humid, 20.16% in arid, and 25.56% in hyper-arid), Theil’s U (9.80% in humid, 28.80% in arid, and 26.83% in hyper-arid), MSEs (24.55% in humid, 13.83% in arid, and 8.22% in hyper-arid), MSEr (19.41% in humid, 29.20% in arid, and 24.14% in hyper-arid) and KGE score (5.26% in humid, 28.12% in arid, and 24.72% in hyper-arid). Higher uncertainties were depicted in heavy and intense precipitation seasons, i.e., monsoon and pre-monsoon. Average values of statistical metrics during monsoon season for SM2RAIN-CCI (SM2RAIN-ASCAT) were 20.90% (17.82%), 10.52 mm/day (8.61 mm/day), 0.47 (0.43), and 0.47 (0.55) for bias, ubRMSE, Theil’s U, and KGE score, respectively. TMPA outperformed SM2RAIN-based products across all climate regions. SM2RAIN-based datasets are recommended for agricultural water management, irrigation scheduling, flood simulation and early flood warning system (EFWS), drought monitoring, groundwater modeling, and rainwater harvesting, and vegetation and crop monitoring in plain areas of the arid region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 5779 KiB  
Article
Performance of the State-Of-The-Art Gridded Precipitation Products over Mountainous Terrain: A Regional Study over Austria
by Ehsan Sharifi, Josef Eitzinger and Wouter Dorigo
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(17), 2018; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11172018 - 28 Aug 2019
Cited by 55 | Viewed by 5330
Abstract
During the last decade, satellite-based precipitation products have been believed to be a potential source for forcing inputs in hydro-meteorological and agricultural models, which are essential especially over the mountains area or in basins where ground gauges are generally sparse or nonexistent. This [...] Read more.
During the last decade, satellite-based precipitation products have been believed to be a potential source for forcing inputs in hydro-meteorological and agricultural models, which are essential especially over the mountains area or in basins where ground gauges are generally sparse or nonexistent. This study comprehensively evaluates several newly released precipitation products, i.e., MSWEP-V2.2, IMERG-V05B, IMERG-V06A, IMERG-V05-RT, ERA5, and SM2RAIN-ASCAT, at daily and monthly time-scales over Austria. We show that all the examined products are able to reproduce the spatial precipitation distribution over the country. MSWEP, followed by IMERG-V05B and -V06A, show the strongest agreement with in situ observations and perform better than other products with respect to spatial patterns and statistical metrics. Both IMERG and ERA5 products seem to have systematic precipitation overestimation at the monthly time-scale. IMERG-V06A performs slightly better than IMERG-V05B. With respect to heavy precipitation (P > 10 mm/day), MSWEP compare to other products demonstrate advantages in detecting precipitation events with a higher spatial average of probability of detection (POD) and lower false alarm ratio (FAR) scores skill (0.74 and 0.28), while SM2RAIN and ERA5 reveal lower POD (0.35) and higher FAR (0.56) in this precipitation range in comparison with other products. However, the ERA5 and MSWEP indicate robust average POD and FAR values with respect to light/moderate precipitation (10 mm > P ≥ 0.1 mm) with 0.94 and 0.11, respectively. Such robustness of MSWEP may be rooted in applying the daily rain gauges in calibration processes. Moreover, although all products accurately map the spatial precipitation distribution they still have difficulty capturing the effects of topography on precipitation. The overall performance of the precipitation products was lower in the peripheries of the study area where most stations are situated in the mountainous area and was higher over the low altitude regions. However, according to our analysis of the considered products, MSWEP-V2.2, followed by IMERG-V06S and -V05B, are the most suitable for driving hydro-meteorological, agricultural, and other models over mountainous terrain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 6507 KiB  
Article
Raindrop Size Distributions and Rain Characteristics Observed by a PARSIVEL Disdrometer in Beijing, Northern China
by Lei Ji, Haonan Chen, Lin Li, Baojun Chen, Xian Xiao, Min Chen and Guifu Zhang
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(12), 1479; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs11121479 - 21 Jun 2019
Cited by 47 | Viewed by 5414
Abstract
Fourteen-month precipitation measurements from a second-generation PARSIVEL disdrometer deployed in Beijing, northern China, were analyzed to investigate the microphysical structure of raindrop size distribution and its implications on polarimetric radar applications. Rainfall types are classified and analyzed in the domain of median volume [...] Read more.
Fourteen-month precipitation measurements from a second-generation PARSIVEL disdrometer deployed in Beijing, northern China, were analyzed to investigate the microphysical structure of raindrop size distribution and its implications on polarimetric radar applications. Rainfall types are classified and analyzed in the domain of median volume diameter D 0 and the normalized intercept parameter N w . The separation line between convective and stratiform rain is almost equivalent to rain rate at 8.6 mm h−1 and radar reflectivity at 36.8 dBZ. Convective rain in Beijing shows distinct seasonal variations in log 10 N w – D 0 domain. X-band dual-polarization variables are simulated using the T-matrix method to derive radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) estimators, and rainfall products at hourly scale are evaluated for four radar QPE estimators using collocated but independent rain gauge observations. This study also combines the advantages of individual estimators based on the thresholds on polarimetric variables. Results show that the blended QPE estimator has better performance than others. The rainfall microphysical analysis presented in this study is expected to facilitate the development of a high-resolution X-band radar network for urban QPE applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Precipitation: Part II)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-26
Back to TopTop