remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Remote Sensing for Estimating Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Plants

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292). This special issue belongs to the section "Forest Remote Sensing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2022) | Viewed by 17974

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Earth, Environment and Society, Bowling Green State University, 190 Overman Hall, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA
Interests: mapping biophysical and biochemical properties; precision agriculture; radiative transfer modeling; machine learning and AI; ecohydrology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Geography, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
Interests: ecosystem modeling; plant biophysical and biochemical traits in relation to environmental and anthropogenic driving factors
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear colleagues,

Quantifying chlorophyll content in plants from local to global scales is vital for forest management and precision agriculture as well as for understanding ecohydrology, plant carbon budget, and the response of plants to climate change and other stress conditions across diverse plant ecosystems.  Remote sensing offers a means of monitoring and mapping plant chlorophyll content over large geographical areas at various spatial and temporal scales.

With this Special Issue, we will compiled state-of-art research to address various remote sensing and modeling techniques for the retrieval of leaf and canopy chlorophyll content across various ecosystems. We welcome papers that address chlorophyll content retrieval methods using non-parametric regression models, such as machine learning and AI; understanding the link between 3D plant structural parameters and chlorophyll content quantification; real-time estimation of chlorophyll content; leaf and canopy level chlorophyll content retrieval using radiative transfer models; remote sensing data and model fusion to overcome challenges of mapping chlorophyll content.

Dr. Anita Simic-Milas
Dr. Yuhong He
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Mapping chlorophyll content for diverse plant ecosystems and validation efforts
  • Three-dimensional monitoring of canopy structural parameters and chlorophyll concentration retrieval
  • Radiative transfer modelling for estimating leaf and canopy chlorophyll content
  • Chlorophyll content and yield prediction in precision agriculture
  • Machine learning and AI for quantifying chlorophyll content
  • Time series analysis of rapid changes of chlorophyll content to predict plant stress responses
  • Chlorophyll content retrieval methods using remote sensing data fusion and/or model fusion approaches

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 2899 KiB  
Article
Applying Variable Selection Methods and Preprocessing Techniques to Hyperspectral Reflectance Data to Estimate Tea Cultivar Chlorophyll Content
by Rei Sonobe and Yuhei Hirono
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(1), 19; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs15010019 - 21 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1486
Abstract
Tea is second only to water as the world’s most popular drink and it is consumed in various forms, such as black and green teas. A range of cultivars has therefore been developed in response to customer preferences. In Japan, farmers may grow [...] Read more.
Tea is second only to water as the world’s most popular drink and it is consumed in various forms, such as black and green teas. A range of cultivars has therefore been developed in response to customer preferences. In Japan, farmers may grow several cultivars to produce different types of tea. Leaf chlorophyll content is affected by disease, nutrition, and environmental factors. It also affects the color of the dried tea leaves: a higher chlorophyll content improves their appearance. The ability to quantify chlorophyll content would therefore facilitate improved tea tree management. Here, we measured the hyperspectral reflectance of 38 cultivars using a compact spectrometer. We also compared various combinations of preprocessing techniques and 14 variable selection methods. According to the ratio of performance to deviation (RPD), detrending was effective at reducing the influence of additive interference of scattered light from particles and then regression coefficients was the best variable selection method for estimating the chlorophyll content of tea leaves, achieving an RPD of 2.60 and a root mean square error of 3.21 μg cm−2. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Estimating Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Plants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3516 KiB  
Article
Unbiasing the Estimation of Chlorophyll from Hyperspectral Images: A Benchmark Dataset, Validation Procedure and Baseline Results
by Bogdan Ruszczak, Agata M. Wijata and Jakub Nalepa
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(21), 5526; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14215526 - 02 Nov 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2259
Abstract
Recent advancements in hyperspectral remote sensing bring exciting opportunities for various domains. Precision agriculture is one of the most widely-researched examples here, as it can benefit from the non-invasiveness and enormous scalability of the Earth observation solutions. In this paper, we focus on [...] Read more.
Recent advancements in hyperspectral remote sensing bring exciting opportunities for various domains. Precision agriculture is one of the most widely-researched examples here, as it can benefit from the non-invasiveness and enormous scalability of the Earth observation solutions. In this paper, we focus on estimating the chlorophyll level in leaves using hyperspectral images—capturing this information may help farmers optimize their agricultural practices and is pivotal in planning the plants’ treatment procedures. Although there are machine learning algorithms for this task, they are often validated over private datasets; therefore, their performance and generalization capabilities are virtually impossible to compare. We tackle this issue and introduce an open dataset including the hyperspectral and in situ ground-truth data, together with a validation procedure which is suggested to follow while investigating the emerging approaches for chlorophyll analysis with the use of our dataset. The experiments not only provided the solid baseline results obtained using 15 machine learning models over the introduced training-test dataset splits but also showed that it is possible to substantially improve the capabilities of the basic data-driven models. We believe that our work can become an important step toward standardizing the way the community validates algorithms for estimating chlorophyll-related parameters, and may be pivotal in consolidating the state of the art in the field by providing a clear and fair way of comparing new techniques over real data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Estimating Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Plants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2829 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of the Methods for Estimating Leaf Chlorophyll Content with SPAD Chlorophyll Meters
by Runfei Zhang, Peiqi Yang, Shouyang Liu, Caihong Wang and Jing Liu
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(20), 5144; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14205144 - 14 Oct 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4308
Abstract
Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is an indicator of leaf photosynthetic capacity. It is crucial for improving the understanding of plant physiological status. SPAD meters are routinely used to provide an instantaneous estimation of in situ LCC. However, the calibration of meter readings into [...] Read more.
Leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is an indicator of leaf photosynthetic capacity. It is crucial for improving the understanding of plant physiological status. SPAD meters are routinely used to provide an instantaneous estimation of in situ LCC. However, the calibration of meter readings into absolute measures of LCC is difficult, and a generic approach for this conversion remains elusive. This study presents an evaluation of the approaches that are commonly used in converting SPAD readings into absolute LCC values. We compared these approaches using three field datasets and one synthetic dataset. The field datasets consist of LCC measured using a destructive method in the laboratory, as well as the SPAD readings measured in the field for various vegetation types. The synthetic dataset was generated with the leaf radiative transfer model PROSPECT-5 across different leaf structures. LCC covers a wide range from 1.40 μg cm−2 to 86.34 μg cm−2 in the field datasets, and it ranges from 5 μg cm−2 to 80 μg cm−2 in the synthetic dataset. The relationships between LCC and SPAD readings were examined using linear, polynomial, exponential, and homographic functions for the field and synthetic datasets. For the field datasets, the assessments of these approaches were conducted for (i) all three datasets together, (ii) individual datasets, and (iii) individual vegetation species. For the synthetic dataset, leaves with different leaf structures (which mimic different vegetation species) were grouped for the evaluation of the approaches. The results demonstrate that the linear function is the most accurate one for the simulated dataset, in which leaf structure is relatively simple due to the turbid medium assumption of the PROSPECT-5 model. The assumption of leaves in the PROSPECT-5 model complies with the assumption made in the designed algorithm of the SPAD meter. As a result, the linear relationship between LCC and SPAD values was found for the modeled dataset in which the leaf structure is simple. For the field dataset, the functions do not perform well for all datasets together, while they improve significantly for individual datasets or species. The overall performance of the linear (LCC=aSPAD+b), polynomial (LCC=aSPAD2+bSPAD+c), and exponential functions (LCC=0.089310SPADα) is promising for various datasets and species with the R2 > 0.8 and RMSE <10 μg cm−2. However, the accuracy of the homographic functions (LCC=aSPAD/bSPAD) changes significantly among different datasets and species with R2 from 0.02 of wheat to 0.92 of linseed (RMSE from 642.50 μg cm−2 to 5.74 μg cm−2). Other than species- and dataset-dependence, the homographic functions are more likely to produce a numerical singularity due to the characteristics of the function per se. Compared with the linear and exponential functions, the polynomial functions have a higher degree of freedom due to one extra fitting parameter. For a smaller size of data, the linear and exponential functions are more suitable than the polynomial functions due to the less fitting parameters. This study compares different approaches and addresses the uncertainty in the conversion from SPAD readings into absolute LCC, which facilitates more accurate measurements of absolute LCC in the field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Estimating Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Plants)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 7472 KiB  
Article
Mapping Canopy Chlorophyll Content in a Temperate Forest Using Airborne Hyperspectral Data
by J. Malin Hoeppner, Andrew K. Skidmore, Roshanak Darvishzadeh, Marco Heurich, Hsing-Chung Chang and Tawanda W. Gara
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(21), 3573; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12213573 - 31 Oct 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3505
Abstract
Chlorophyll content, as the primary pigment driving photosynthesis, is directly affected by many natural and anthropogenic disturbances and stressors. Accurate and timely estimation of canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) is essential for effective ecosystem monitoring to allow for successful management interventions to occur. Hyperspectral [...] Read more.
Chlorophyll content, as the primary pigment driving photosynthesis, is directly affected by many natural and anthropogenic disturbances and stressors. Accurate and timely estimation of canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) is essential for effective ecosystem monitoring to allow for successful management interventions to occur. Hyperspectral remote sensing offers the possibility to accurately estimate and map canopy chlorophyll content. In the past, research has predominantly focused on the use of hyperspectral data on canopy chlorophyll content retrieval of crops and grassland ecosystems. Therefore, in this study, a temperate mixed forest, the Bavarian Forest National Park in Germany, was chosen as the study site. We compared different statistical models (narrowband vegetation indices (VIs), partial least squares regression (PLSR) and random forest (RF)) in their accuracy to predict CCC using airborne hyperspectral data. The airborne hyperspectral imagery was acquired by the AisaFenix sensor (623 bands; 3.5 nm spectral resolution in the visible near-infrared (VNIR) region, and 12 nm spectral resolution in the shortwave infrared (SWIR) region; 3 m spatial resolution) on July 6, 2017. In situ leaf chlorophyll content and leaf area index measurements were sampled from the upper canopy of coniferous, mixed, and deciduous forest stands in July and August 2017. The study yielded the highest retrieval accuracies with PLSR (root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.25 g/m2, R2 = 0.66). It further indicated specific spectral regions within the visible (390–400 nm and 470–540 nm), red edge (680–780 nm), near-infrared (1050–1100 nm) and shortwave infrared regions (2000–2270 nm) that were important for CCC retrieval. The results showed that forest CCC can be mapped with relatively high accuracies using image spectroscopy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Estimating Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Plants)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 3392 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Leaf Chlorophyll a, b and Carotenoid Contents and Their Ratios Using Hyperspectral Reflectance
by Rei Sonobe, Hiroto Yamashita, Harumi Mihara, Akio Morita and Takashi Ikka
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(19), 3265; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs12193265 - 08 Oct 2020
Cited by 47 | Viewed by 5257
Abstract
Japanese horseradish (wasabi) grows in very specific conditions, and recent environmental climate changes have damaged wasabi production. In addition, the optimal culture methods are not well known, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for incipient farmers to cultivate it. Chlorophyll a, b [...] Read more.
Japanese horseradish (wasabi) grows in very specific conditions, and recent environmental climate changes have damaged wasabi production. In addition, the optimal culture methods are not well known, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for incipient farmers to cultivate it. Chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid contents, as well as their allocation, could be an adequate indicator in evaluating its production and environmental stress; thus, developing an in situ method to monitor photosynthetic pigments based on reflectance could be useful for agricultural management. Besides original reflectance (OR), five pre-processing techniques, namely, first derivative reflectance (FDR), continuum-removed (CR), de-trending (DT), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), and standard normal variate transformation (SNV), were compared to assess the accuracy of the estimation. Furthermore, five machine learning algorithms—random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), kernel-based extreme learning machine (KELM), Cubist, and Stochastic Gradient Boosting (SGB)—were considered. To classify the samples under different pH or sulphur ion concentration conditions, the end of the red edge bands was effective for OR, FDR, DT, MSC, and SNV, while a green-peak band was effective for CR. Overall, KELM and Cubist showed high performance and incorporating pre-processing techniques was effective for obtaining estimated values with high accuracy. The best combinations were found to be DT–KELM for chl a (RPD = 1.511–5.17, RMSE = 1.23–3.62 μg cm−2) and chl a:b (RPD = 0.73–3.17, RMSE = 0.13–0.60); CR–KELM for chl b (RPD = 1.92–5.06, RMSE = 0.41–1.03 μg cm−2) and chl a:car (RPD = 1.31–3.23, RMSE = 0.26–0.50); SNV–Cubist for car (RPD = 1.63–3.32, RMSE = 0.31–1.89 μg cm−2); and DT–Cubist for chl:car (RPD = 1.53–3.96, RMSE = 0.27–0.74). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Estimating Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Plants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop