sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Biocultural Diversity and Nature Conservation

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability, Biodiversity and Conservation".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 November 2021) | Viewed by 3503

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, Haryana, India
Interests: natural resource management; performance measurement & management; biodiversity; conservation; forest management; conservation biology; sustainability; sustainable development; natural resources conservation; society and environment
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Chief Guest Editor
Department of Ecotechnology and Sustainable Building Engineering, Mid Sweden University, Sweden
Interests: biodiversity; sociocultural systems; underuse; overuse; nature conservation; governance; policy and instrument mixes
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The aim of this Special Issue on “Biocultural Diversity and Nature Conservation” is to stimulate learning and debate on the role of biocultural and conservation approaches in understanding the relationship between local cultures and natural environments. The main scope of this Special Issue is to capture new insights through contributions related to biocultural diversity and nature conservation from cross-sectoral fields of social–ecological systems for the development of new ideas, knowledge, approaches, policies, and learning on sustainability science.

This Special Issue of Sustainability accepts submissions for reviews that combine topics on biocultural diversity and nature conservation. All scientific disciplines are welcome. Contributions from the followings areas are sought-after:

  • Empirical (qualitatively and/or quantitatively data backed) and theoretical contributions;
  • Philosophical and historical analysis; case studies; conceptual framework and assessments; learning and lessons with newly developed approaches and methods, and their practical application;
  • Deductive and inductive studies; thematically horizontal or sectorial papers;
  • Single (case) studies, local/regional or country studies with a potential wider application; comparative studies beyond countries or continents;
  • Plural institutions and perspectives (e.g., knowledge co-production) in promoting conservation of biocultural diversity and nature conservation;
  • Establishing coherence between and amongst policy and developments to ensure sustainability of biocultural diversity and natural resources;
  • Inter-, trans-, and multidisciplinary studies;
  • Drivers, pressures, state, impact, responses in connection with biocultural diversity and nature conservation; overuse, underuse, invasive alien species, dispersed threats (climate change, nitrogen and phosphorus flows to the biosphere and oceans, chemical pollution and the release of novel entities, etc.);
  • Tools, policies, instruments, and their mixes and their relation to biocultural diversity and nature conservation;
  • Influence/role/status of international policies (e.g., Convention on Biological Diversity and other conventions such as the World Heritage Convention, Access and Benefit Sharing, Nagoya Protocol, Post-2000 Biodiversity Framework, UN 2030 Agenda, UNESCO Man and Biosphere program, Aichi Biodiversity Target 18, Global Strategy for Plant Conservation and the Sustainable Development Goals) on biocultural diversity and nature conservation;
  • Species conservation and site conservation; protected areas;
  • “Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems”—GIAHS, “Socio-ecological Production Landscapes”—SEPLS, “Satoyama” and “Satoumi”; IUCN Green List;
  • Social–ecological resilience with special reference to multiple stressors (including climate change) and biocultural resources/diversity;
  • Public participation, stakeholder involvements, home gardens, indigenous peoples and local communities, knowledge, prior informed consent (PIC).

Each proposed contribution shall in particularly outline its relevance to biocultural diversity and nature conservation in connection to one of the areas pointed out above.

Prof. Dr. Volker Mauerhofer
Dr. Ranjay K. Singh
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • drivers
  • pressures, state, impact, responses in connection with biocultural diversity and nature conservation
  • social–ecological systems
  • indigenous and formal institutions
  • conservation tools and mixes
  • international policies
  • species conservation and site conservation
  • protected areas
  • people participation
  • stakeholder involvement

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 4230 KiB  
Article
Adapting to Social–Ecological Risks to the Conservation of a Muskmelon Landrace in India
by Anshuman Singh, Ranjay K. Singh, Neeraj Kumar, Suresh Kumar, Parvender Sheoran, Dheeraj Singh, Satyendra Kumar and P. C. Sharma
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 9880; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14169880 - 10 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1471
Abstract
Crop landraces are vanishing alarmingly worldwide, posing serious risks to the livelihoods of the resource-poor farmers; this study, conducted using ‘vulnerability’ and ‘resilience theory’ frameworks, sought to delineate social–ecological, climatic and policy hindrances to the conservation of a muskmelon landrace ‘Jaunpuri Netted [...] Read more.
Crop landraces are vanishing alarmingly worldwide, posing serious risks to the livelihoods of the resource-poor farmers; this study, conducted using ‘vulnerability’ and ‘resilience theory’ frameworks, sought to delineate social–ecological, climatic and policy hindrances to the conservation of a muskmelon landrace ‘Jaunpuri Netted’ traditionally grown in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Our results showed that the blue bull menace, market constraints and erratic rainfall have gradually emerged as severe stresses to the conservation of this muskmelon landrace. Yet, a set of enablers including relative ease in crop management, pleasant fruit taste, perceived livelihood opportunities and the cultural legacy seem to offset these stresses, at least partly, keeping the farmers engaged in muskmelon cultivation. The Tobid regression analysis revealed that educated farmers with large landholdings were likely to grow muskmelon on relatively small acreages, and that market constraints, blue bull menace and erratic rainfall are the major future risks to the muskmelon-based livelihoods. A growing obsession with higher fruit yields has led to the virtual eclipse of traditional crop management practices, further enhancing the vulnerability of muskmelon growers. Addressing these challenges requires some major changes to the ways in which the muskmelon crop is managed and traded. While muskmelon growers need to revisit the present chemical-intensive practices, adequate research and policy support remain requisite to unveiling the unique nutraceutical properties of this muskmelon landrace, promoting organic farming, reviving seed-based business opportunities, and creating strong market linkages to enhance the livelihood resilience of the muskmelon growers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocultural Diversity and Nature Conservation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1783 KiB  
Article
Response of Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Communities to Effect of Urbanization in Southern Osaka: An Analytical Approach Using GIS
by Jin-Wook Park and Cheol Min Lee
Sustainability 2021, 13(13), 7134; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13137134 - 25 Jun 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1326
Abstract
Urbanization involves the profound alteration of original habitats and causes habitat loss and biodiversity decline. This study aims to clarify the response of ground beetle communities to the effect of urbanization in southern Osaka, Japan. In total, 2950 individuals from 53 species of [...] Read more.
Urbanization involves the profound alteration of original habitats and causes habitat loss and biodiversity decline. This study aims to clarify the response of ground beetle communities to the effect of urbanization in southern Osaka, Japan. In total, 2950 individuals from 53 species of ground beetle were collected in nine urban green areas. The categories of land use regarding the study sites were determined based on GIS data. The community index was not significantly different between areas. Urban areas and roads in land use mainly have a negative influence on ground beetles. Paddies, fields, parks and green spaces, and open space were positively correlated with species richness of forest species and large-sized species, and open space was positively correlated with species richness and the density of open land species. However, ground beetle communities in different areas of varying sizes did not group separately. These results suggest that changes in paddies, fields, parks and green spaces, forests, and open space associated with the expanding urban area and road greatly influenced species composition, and the community structure remained similar. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocultural Diversity and Nature Conservation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop