sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Co-optimisation of CO2 Storage and Hydrocarbon Recovery

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Engineering and Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 May 2022) | Viewed by 11787

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Petroleum Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Interests: enhanced oil and gas recovery; carbon sequestration; reservoir simulation; techno-economic analysis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The increasing concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is the major known reason for global warming or climate change. However, the total replacement of fossil fuels (as the primary source of CO2 emission) with renewable energy is impossible in the near term because of the major share of fossil fuel in energy generation and the societal need to access energy for technology and economic development. Geological storage of CO2 is a technically proven method and currently the best solution to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and therefore develop a sustainable environment.

Several types of geological formations can be used for CO2 storage, including oil, gas, and coal bed methane reservoirs and saline aquifers, which have CO2 storage capabilities for millions of years. CO2 storage into oil and gas reservoirs, and coal bed methane reservoirs are economically more feasible due to the revenue associated with enhanced oil or gas recovery (EOR/EGR/ECBM).

Several factors need to be considered to co-optimise CO2 storage and hydrocarbon recovery to achieve technical and economic success and environmental sustainability. These factors include reservoir characterisation and understanding the reservoir geology, access to an affordable supply of CO2, the size of the target reservoir, metering and monitoring pressures and flow rates at injection and production wells, operational risk assessment and safety performance, economics, and considering alternatives injection scenarios to increase the amount of CO2 trapped during enhanced hydrocarbon recovery. 

We invite contributions on innovative technical developments, case studies, analysis, reviews, and assessments, which are relevant to CO2 storage and hydrocarbon recovery. This Special Issue focuses on but is not limited to CO2 storage in oil and gas reservoirs, storage capacity assessments, reservoir characterisation, fluid flow behaviour, geochemical reactions and reservoir response during and after CO2 injection, enhanced hydrocarbon recovery methods, co-optimising CO2 EOR/EGR/ECBM, and storage and technoeconomic analysis.

Dr. Fatemeh Kamali
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • CO2 storage
  • CO2 utilisation
  • CO2 EOR/EGR/ECBM
  • CCUS
  • storage capacity
  • enhanced oil recovery
  • enhanced gas recovery
  • coal bed methane reservoirs
  • gas injection
  • reservoir simulation and modelling
  • experimental studies
  • techno-economic analysis
  • climate change
  • global warming
  • sustainable environment

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 5174 KiB  
Article
A Laboratory Approach to Measure Enhanced Gas Recovery from a Tight Gas Reservoir during Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Injection
by Rahmad Syah, Seyed Mehdi Alizadeh, Karina Shamilyevna Nurgalieva, John William Grimaldo Guerrero, Mahyuddin K. M. Nasution, Afshin Davarpanah, Dadan Ramdan and Ahmed Sayed M. Metwally
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11606; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132111606 - 20 Oct 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2757
Abstract
Supercritical carbon dioxide injection in tight reservoirs is an efficient and prominent enhanced gas recovery method, as it can be more mobilized in low-permeable reservoirs due to its molecular size. This paper aimed to perform a set of laboratory experiments to evaluate the [...] Read more.
Supercritical carbon dioxide injection in tight reservoirs is an efficient and prominent enhanced gas recovery method, as it can be more mobilized in low-permeable reservoirs due to its molecular size. This paper aimed to perform a set of laboratory experiments to evaluate the impacts of permeability and water saturation on enhanced gas recovery, carbon dioxide storage capacity, and carbon dioxide content during supercritical carbon dioxide injection. It is observed that supercritical carbon dioxide provides a higher gas recovery increase after the gas depletion drive mechanism is carried out in low permeable core samples. This corresponds to the feasible mobilization of the supercritical carbon dioxide phase through smaller pores. The maximum gas recovery increase for core samples with 0.1 mD is about 22.5%, while gas recovery increase has lower values with the increase in permeability. It is about 19.8%, 15.3%, 12.1%, and 10.9% for core samples with 0.22, 0.36, 0.54, and 0.78 mD permeability, respectively. Moreover, higher water saturations would be a crucial factor in the gas recovery enhancement, especially in the final pore volume injection, as it can increase the supercritical carbon dioxide dissolving in water, leading to more displacement efficiency. The minimum carbon dioxide storage for 0.1 mD core samples is about 50%, while it is about 38% for tight core samples with the permeability of 0.78 mD. By decreasing water saturation from 0.65 to 0.15, less volume of supercritical carbon dioxide is involved in water, and therefore, carbon dioxide storage capacity increases. This is indicative of a proper gas displacement front in lower water saturation and higher gas recovery factor. The findings of this study can help for a better understanding of the gas production mechanism and crucial parameters that affect gas recovery from tight reservoirs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Co-optimisation of CO2 Storage and Hydrocarbon Recovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 21385 KiB  
Article
The Geomechanical and Fault Activation Modeling during CO2 Injection into Deep Minjur Reservoir, Eastern Saudi Arabia
by Sikandar Khan, Yehia Khulief, Abdullatif Al-Shuhail, Salem Bashmal and Naveed Iqbal
Sustainability 2020, 12(23), 9800; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12239800 - 24 Nov 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 2760
Abstract
The release of large quantities of CO2 into the atmosphere is one of the major causes of global warming. The most viable method to control the level of CO2 in the atmosphere is to capture and permanently sequestrate the excess amount [...] Read more.
The release of large quantities of CO2 into the atmosphere is one of the major causes of global warming. The most viable method to control the level of CO2 in the atmosphere is to capture and permanently sequestrate the excess amount of CO2 in subsurface geological reservoirs. The injection of CO2 gives rise to pore pressure buildup. It is crucial to monitor the rising pore pressure in order to prevent the potential failure of the reservoir and the subsequent leakage of the stored CO2 into the overburden layers, and then back to the atmosphere. In this paper, the Minjur sandstone reservoir in eastern Saudi Arabia was considered for establishing a coupled geomechanical model and performing the corresponding stability analysis. During the geomechanical modeling process, the fault passing through the Minjur and Marrat layers was also considered. The injection-induced pore-pressure and ground uplift profiles were calculated for the case of absence of a fault across the reservoir, as well as the case with a fault. The stability analysis was performed using the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. In the current study, the excessive increase in pore pressure, in the absence of geological faults, moved the reservoir closer to the failure envelope, but in the presence of geological faults, the reservoir reached to the failure envelope and the faults were activated. The developed geomechanical model provided estimates for the safe injection parameters of CO2 based on the magnitudes of the reservoir pore pressure and stresses in the reservoir. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Co-optimisation of CO2 Storage and Hydrocarbon Recovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 1184 KiB  
Review
A Critical Review on Mathematical Descriptions to Study Flux Processes and Environmental-Related Interactions of Mangroves
by Jefferson Brooks, Miguel Chen Austin, Dafni Mora and Nathalia Tejedor-Flores
Sustainability 2021, 13(12), 6970; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13126970 - 21 Jun 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2077
Abstract
Trees are resources that provide multiple benefits, such as the conservation of fauna, both terrestrial and marine, a source of food and raw material, and offering protection in storms, which makes it practical to understand their behavior against different phenomena. Such understanding may [...] Read more.
Trees are resources that provide multiple benefits, such as the conservation of fauna, both terrestrial and marine, a source of food and raw material, and offering protection in storms, which makes it practical to understand their behavior against different phenomena. Such understanding may be possible through process modeling. Studies confirm that mangrove forests can store more carbon than other forests, influencing the fight against global warming. Thus, a critical and systematic review was carried out regarding studies focusing on mangroves to collect information on the models that have been applied and the most influential variables highlighted by other authors. Applying a systematic search for the most relevant topics related to mangroves (basic as well as recent information), it is possible to group models and methods carried out by other authors to respond to certain behaviors presented by mangroves. Moreover, possible structuring of a mathematical model applied to a species of interest thanks to the analyzed references could provide justified information to the authorities on the importance of these forests and the benefits of their preservation and regeneration-recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Co-optimisation of CO2 Storage and Hydrocarbon Recovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 534 KiB  
Review
Reserves Estimation for Coalbed Methane Reservoirs: A Review
by Ali Altowilib, Ahmed AlSaihati, Hussain Alhamood, Saad Alafnan and Sulaiman Alarifi
Sustainability 2020, 12(24), 10621; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su122410621 - 18 Dec 2020
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 3413
Abstract
A continuous growth in the global economy and population requires a sustainable energy supply. Maximizing recovery factor out of the naturally occurring hydrocarbons resources has been an active area of continuous development to meet the globally increasing demand for energy. Coalbed methane (CBM), [...] Read more.
A continuous growth in the global economy and population requires a sustainable energy supply. Maximizing recovery factor out of the naturally occurring hydrocarbons resources has been an active area of continuous development to meet the globally increasing demand for energy. Coalbed methane (CBM), which is one of the primary resources of natural gas, associates complex storage mechanisms and requires some advanced recovery techniques, rendering conventional reserve assessment methods insufficient. This work presents a literature review on CBM in different aspects. This includes rock characteristics such as porosity, permeability, adsorption capacity, adsorption isotherm, and coal classification. In addition, CBM reservoirs are compared to conventional reservoirs in terms of reservoir quality, reservoir properties, accumulation, and water/gas saturation and production. Different topics that contribute to the production of CBM reservoirs are also discussed. This includes production mechanisms, well spacing, well completion, and petrophysical interpretations. The main part of this work sheds a light on the available techniques to determine initial-gas-in-place in CBM reservoirs such as volumetric, decline curve, and material balance. It also presents the pros and cons of each technique. Lastly, common development and economic challenges in CBM fields are listed in addition to environmental concerns. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Co-optimisation of CO2 Storage and Hydrocarbon Recovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop