sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The Impact of Conscious Capitalism on Business and Consumers

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 April 2023) | Viewed by 12958

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Marketing, Entreprenuership, Hospitality & Tourism, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27402, USA
Interests: CSR; cause-related marketing; responsbile AI; sustainable business practices and consumer responses

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

 

Fundamentally, no capitalist system can function without inter-connected relationships between firms and society. The fields of marketing, psychology, sociology, and/or philosophy have delved into the role of conscious capitalism within society.  

 

Particularly, responsible business actions including CSR, cause-marketing, and ESG have gained much attention in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change. Moreover, as technology has evolved, the notion of responsibility is also applied to the role of technology within society. For example, there have been some incidents such as Amazon’s Alexa/Echo devices eavesdropping on people’s conversations as well as collecting data for their understanding of people’s behaviors. The question then becomes: would more advanced technology and big data-based personalization of firms’ offerings while ignoring consumer privacy be good for consumer wellbeing in the end? In the literature, despite the importance of conscious capitalism in shaping human behaviors and our future, it is only recently that this topic has attracted the attention of consumer researchers.

 

Thus, the goal of this Sustainability issue is to bring together novel research on whether and how conscious capitalism shapes people’s perceptions, judgment, behaviors, and consumption.  Addressing the research gap will complement the current literature on CSR, cause-related marketing, consumer behaviors, technology/innovation, and ethics to converge on a more comprehensive understanding. The topics of interst for this issue include (but are not limited to):

 

CSR, ESG, and Cause-Marketing as Double-Edged Swords:

  • What are the sources of consumers’ perceptions of authenticity (vs. marketing gimmick) regarding firms’ CSR or ESG? What may help firms to avoid unexpected setbacks from their pursuit of CSR/ESG/cause-related marketing?
  • Does (and how does) the firm’s type of business focus (e.g., luxury brands) conflict with the firms’ CSR or cause-marketing?
  • How do firms’ controversial actions influence consumer response toward the firms? What may alleviate/amplify such impact?

 

Responsible AI and Technology:

  • How do advanced technology and big data-based personalization of firms’ offerings over consumer privacy influence consumer wellbeing?
  • In what areas do consumers feel comfortable (or not comfortable) providing their private information when using technology-based services or social media?
  • In what ways do consumers view innovative technology as harmful or helpful and how do such perspectives influence their subsequent decision making?

 

Responsible/Irresponsible Firm Actions and Consumption:

  • When and why do some CSR and ESG actions influence consumer responses and actions?
  • How can firms reduce the gap between consumers’ favorable intention toward socially responsible firms and their actual purchase behaviors?
  • How may the medium of communication (e.g., offline, online, mobile) about firms’ responsible actions influence consumer evaluation of the same sustainability issue differently? What types of communication entity (e.g., picture, text, tweet, Instagram, etc.) are more effective than others and why?

 

Generational Gap and Cultural Differences:

  • Do Generation Z, who are known to consider sustainability, actually buy socially responsible products/services more than other generations? If so, what explains such generational differences?
  • Does culture across countries or even within a country drive differing attention to conscious business and consumer roles?
  • What type of products/services do consumers consider having greater social responsibilities than others?

 

Manuscripts that help to answer questions such as these and/or shed light on the theoretical and practical implications of sustainable business would be considered for this issue. We encourage different methodological approaches, including traditional experiments, qualitative/quantiative methods, field studies, and quantitative methods.

 

Prof. Dr. Jiyoung Hwang
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

sustainability; cause-related marketing; CSR; ESG; AI; consumer privacy; generationz; cultural difference

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

28 pages, 2375 KiB  
Article
The Importance of Sustainability Aspects When Purchasing Online: Comparing Generation X and Generation Z
by Benedikt M. Brand, Theresa Maria Rausch and Jannika Brandel
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5689; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14095689 - 08 May 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 11632
Abstract
As research on sustainability orientation across generations is still sparse, we contribute to literature by enriching this research field, focusing on Generation Z (‘Zers’) and X (‘Xers’). Moreover, no other study has analyzed cross-generational differences in the sustainability context by making use of [...] Read more.
As research on sustainability orientation across generations is still sparse, we contribute to literature by enriching this research field, focusing on Generation Z (‘Zers’) and X (‘Xers’). Moreover, no other study has analyzed cross-generational differences in the sustainability context by making use of choice experiments, which overcome issues related to (Likert) scale item investigations, and allow respondents to evaluate the trade-off between different purchase factors simultaneously. We thus applied one of the most recent advancements in choice experiments, named Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint analysis, which appears to be more realistic than previous alternatives. The results indicate Zers consume more sustainably (inter alia higher importance of social labels; higher purchase likelihood) when shopping online; however, differences within each generation were uncovered, especially among Xers (e.g., gender differences regarding importance of price). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Conscious Capitalism on Business and Consumers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop