sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Innovation Management and Knowledge in the Business Scientific Field: Mapping the Research Front

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 10228

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Accounting and Finance Department, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Interests: reputational risk; proxy advisors; sustainability; corporate social responsibility; finance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Business Administration Department, Santiago de Compostela University, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Interests: corporate social responsibility; organizational climate; laboral conditions; behavioral finance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The current situation derived from the COVID-19 pandemic is causing serious and important changes, both in health and in socioeconomic spheres. In relation to sustainability, there are deeply pessimistic expectations regarding advances toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in developing countries (Barbier and Burgess, 2020; Leal-Filho et al., 2020), and different resource and waste management challenges have appeared or worsened (Neumeyer et al., 2020; Vanapalli et al., 2020). Nevertheless, we cannot disregard some positive effects on sustainability, such as reduced emissions, and the many opportunities that this crisis can bring to contribute to sustainability transition in industrial (Kanda and Kivimaa, 2020; Schaltegger, 2020) and human systems (Giudice et al., 2020; Rowan and Galanakis, 2020). The pandemic is provoking cultural, lifestyle and societal changes that can result in positive and negative sustainability outcomes and open new entrepreneurial opportunities (Neumeyer et al., 2020; Ratten, 2020). It is also important to acknowledge that changes in previous unsustainable patters (Bodenheimer and Leidenberger, 2020) and in traditional models of knowledge production and dissemination (Hensher et al., 2020) can help toward preventing future pandemics. Ultimately, innovative solutions are needed to manage the challenges and opportunities that the COVID-19 pandemic has brought for sustainability (Cattivelli and Rusciano, 2020; Rowan and Galanakis, 2020; Vanapalli et al., 2020; Lee and Trimi, 2021).

In this context, the consideration of knowledge as both input and output of innovation and entrepreneurship reaches an unknown dimension. Many authors have pointed out that it is not the promotion of knowledge, entrepreneurship or innovation in isolation (Block et al., 2017; Lehmann et al., 2015; Huggins and Thompson, 2015) but the intersection and interactions between the three concepts that are increasingly considered as critical for development and growth (Piñeiro-Chousa et al., 2020). The current technological revolution accentuated by the COVID pandemic (Lee and Trimi, 2021) will in the future bring about huge changes in the economic, political, social or health fields. Some of these changes can already be glimpsed now, while others will emerge later animated by a new reality.

As a way to face these changes, this Special Issue aims to make a relevant contribution presenting works with new innovative knowledge related to the innovation–entrepreneurship–knowledge triad from a sustainability point of view. Thus, in general, suitable topics are oriented toward understanding the role of entrepreneurship in the process of transforming knowledge into innovation in a sustainable way. More specifically, suitable topics include but are not limited to the following: technology advances (big data, industry 4.0, IoT, blockchain, artificial intelligence, etc.); new lifestyles (way back to villages, friendly cities, gaming and e-sports, sustainable glocalization, telecommuting, virtual meetings, online education, etc); climate change and industrial sectors (smarter logistics, reverse logistics, circular economy, transportation and storage of goods, air emissions and waste management, renewable energies and sustainable development, etc.); new productive processes (digital automation and cyberphysical systems, robotics, additive manufacturing technologies (3D printing), online sharing platforms, supply-chain disruptions, traceability and transparency, etc.); open innovation; entrepreneurial sustainability and management innovation; and new ways of innovative business.

References

Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2020). Sustainability and development after COVID-19. World Development 135, 105082. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105082

Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & van Praag, M. (2017). The schumpeterian entrepreneur: A review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 61-95. http://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/ 10.1080/1983662716.2016.1216397

Bodenheimer M., & Leidenberger, J. (2020). COVID-19 as a window of opportunity for sustainability transitions? Narratives and communication strategies beyond the pandemic. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 61-66. http://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/15487733.2020.1766318

Cattivelli, V., & Rusciano, V. (2020). Social Innovation and Food Provisioning during Covid-19: The Case of Urban–Rural Initiatives in the Province of Naples. Sustainability, 12, 4444. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12114444

Giudice, F., Caferra, R., Morone, P. (2020). COVID-19, the food system and the circulareconomy: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12, 7939. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12197939

Hensher, M., Kish, K., Farley, J., Quilley, S., & Zywert, K. (2020). Open knowledge commons versus privatized gain in a fractured information ecology: Lessons from COVID-19 for the future of sustainability. Global Sustainability, 3, E26. http://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1017/sus.2020.21

Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: A network theory. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 103-128. http://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11187-015-9643-3

Kanda, W., & Kivimaa, P. (2020). What opportunities could the COVID-19 outbreak offer for sustainability transitions research on electricity and mobility? Energy Research & Social Science 68, 101666. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101666

Leal-Filho, W., Brandli, L. L., Lange Salvia, A., Rayman-Bacchus, L., & Platje, J. (2020). COVID-19 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Threat to Solidarity or an Opportunity? Sustainability, 12, 5343. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12135343

Lee, S.M., & Trimi, S. (2021). Convergence innovation in the digital age and in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Journal of Business Research 123, 14-22. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.041

Lehmann, E. E., Ghio, N., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 1-18. http://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/ 10.1007/s11187-014-9588-y

Neumeyer, X., Ashton, W. S., & Dentchev, N. (2020). Addressing resource and waste management challenges imposed by COVID-19: An entrepreneurship perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 162, 105058. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105058

Piñeiro-Chousa, J., López-Cabarcos M. Á, Romero-Castro N. M., & Pérez-Pico, A. M. (2020). Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front. Journal of Business Research 115, 475-485. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.045

Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-19) and entrepreneurship: cultural, lifestyle and societal changes. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, ahead-of-print ( ahead-of-print). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1108/JEEE-06-2020-0163

Rowan, N. J., & Galanakis, C. M. (2020). Unlocking challenges and opportunities presented by COVID-19 pandemic for cross-cutting disruption in agri-food and green deal innovations: Quo Vadis? Science of The Total Environment 748, 141362. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141362

Schaltegger, S. (2020). Sustainability learnings from the COVID-19 crisis. Opportunities for resilient industry and business development. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, ahead-of-print( ahead-of-print). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2020-0296

Vanapalli, K. R., Sharma, H. B., Ranjan, V. P., Samal, B., Bhattacharya, J., Dubey, B. K., &  Goel, S .(2020). Challenges and strategies for effective plastic waste management during and post COVID-19 pandemic. Science of The Total Environment 750, 141514. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141514

You may choose our Joint Special Issue in Administrative Sciences.

Prof. Dr. JUAN RAMON PIÑEIRO CHOUSA
Prof. Dr. M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • innovation–entrepreneurship–knowledge
  • sustainable entrepreneurship
  • sustainable innovation
  • knowledge management

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

26 pages, 306 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Dialogue with Stakeholders by the IBEX 35 Companies
by Isabel-María García-Sánchez, Cristina Aibar-Guzmán, Carmen Serrano-Valdecillos and Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1913; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14031913 - 08 Feb 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1758
Abstract
Stakeholder dialogue is considered a key component of companies’ corporate social responsibility strategy with the aim to discover stakeholders’ demands, expectations, and their view of the firms. Based on the stakeholder theory, this paper aims to deepen the knowledge about stakeholder dialogue by [...] Read more.
Stakeholder dialogue is considered a key component of companies’ corporate social responsibility strategy with the aim to discover stakeholders’ demands, expectations, and their view of the firms. Based on the stakeholder theory, this paper aims to deepen the knowledge about stakeholder dialogue by analyzing how firms conduct the dialogue with five key stakeholder groups (i.e., employees, customers, suppliers, investors and shareholders, and the community). Using a sample of 35 leading Spanish companies and, after the collection and processing of the information available in their corporate websites and reports, we have determined the channels that are used, the pursued objectives, and the main commitments achieved. The results indicate that firms are engaged in several forms of dialogue with stakeholders and use various channels which differ depending on the targeted stakeholder group. We gain insight into the initiatives with which companies engage with stakeholders, the underlying interactions, and how each stakeholder group views and assesses the firm. Practical implications for policy makers and managers, as well as future lines of research are proposed. Full article
22 pages, 2737 KiB  
Article
Understanding the Antecedents of Entrepreneurship and Renewable Energies to Promote the Development of Community Renewable Energy in Rural Areas
by Noelia Romero-Castro, Vanessa Miramontes-Viña and María Ángeles López-Cabarcos
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1234; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14031234 - 21 Jan 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2302
Abstract
Sustainable rural development (SRD) is an essential component of sustainable development on a global scale. Community Renewable Energy (CRE) has been advocated as a step forward in the progress towards SRD. While Northern European countries are experiencing a high development of CRE, Southern [...] Read more.
Sustainable rural development (SRD) is an essential component of sustainable development on a global scale. Community Renewable Energy (CRE) has been advocated as a step forward in the progress towards SRD. While Northern European countries are experiencing a high development of CRE, Southern European countries lag behind. Considering entrepreneurship and renewable energy technologies (RET) as two fundamental components of CRE, through a systematic literature review this study identifies the antecedents or conditioning factors of entrepreneurship and RET exploitation in rural areas of developed countries, understanding that these same antecedents condition the development of CRE in these countries. The identified factors are organized around five capital spheres: economic, human, social, physical and natural. Given that these five spheres are not watertight compartments, but rather that their limits are diffuse and there are multiple interactions between them, we try to highlight their interrelationships through System Thinking based on the design of causal loop diagrams. The results can help policy makers and CRE projects’ promoters in the design of effective policies and strategies to foster the development of CRE in rural areas of developed countries. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 298 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Top Management Team Gender Diversity on Climate Change Management: An International Study
by Jérôme Caby, Clotilde Coron and Ydriss Ziane
Sustainability 2022, 14(2), 1032; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14021032 - 17 Jan 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3158
Abstract
The aim of this research was to assess the effect of top management team gender diversity on firms’ effective commitment to climate change management from two new perspectives: a more detailed analysis of gender diversity in corporate management and an international analysis of [...] Read more.
The aim of this research was to assess the effect of top management team gender diversity on firms’ effective commitment to climate change management from two new perspectives: a more detailed analysis of gender diversity in corporate management and an international analysis of the phenomenon. Broadening climate change management assessment through selected CDP qualitative metrics for governance, risk management and strategy provides a more in-depth view of climate change managerial practices. Even though a growing body of academic literature highlights the potential positive impact of gender diversity, this empirical research based on a sample of 836 firms from 16 developed countries provides mainly inconclusive results. These results may be explained first by a still insufficient and below critical mass, percentage of women within top management teams; and second, by a selection bias, as only the best performers disclose their climate change management data. This also calls for companies to improve their gender diversity among the top management team, and for regulators to further extend compulsory climate change management reporting. Full article
16 pages, 287 KiB  
Article
Synchronizing the Logic of Inquiry with the Logic of Action: The Case of Urban Climate Policy
by Chris J. Barton, Qingqing Wang, Derrick M. Anderson and Drew A. Callow
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10625; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su131910625 - 24 Sep 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2020
Abstract
Policymakers often rely on scientific knowledge for making policy decisions, and many scientists aim to produce knowledge that is useful to policymakers. However, the logic of action (which guides policy) and the logic of inquiry (which guides research) do not always align. We [...] Read more.
Policymakers often rely on scientific knowledge for making policy decisions, and many scientists aim to produce knowledge that is useful to policymakers. However, the logic of action (which guides policy) and the logic of inquiry (which guides research) do not always align. We introduce the term “logic synchronization” to characterize the degree to which the logic of policy action aligns with the logic of scientific inquiry. We use the case of urban climate policy to explore this dynamic using a purposive literature review. The framework presented here is helpful in identifying areas in which the logic of inquiry and the logic of action synchronize, creating the opportunity for both policy-relevant science and science-informed policy. It also reveals where the logics do not yet synchronize, which indicates where scientists and policy makers can productively focus their efforts. The framework introduced here can be both theoretically and practically useful for linking scientific knowledge to policy action. Full article
Back to TopTop