sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Life Cycle Analysis and Urban Sustainability

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Urban and Rural Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2021) | Viewed by 5895

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Via Anguillarese, 301, S. Maria di Galeria, 00123 Rome, Italy
Interests: building energy efficiency; urban climate; urban sustainability; built environment; urban heat island; global warming; local warming; energy transition; decarbonization
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Cities are already among the major energy consumers and, therefore, among the major contributors to climate change.

In the next decades, the expected increase in urban population will entail an increase in new urban land, which often entails an unintended surge in local urban temperature; namely, the urban heat island (UHI) effect. In turn, UHI affects both building energy demand for cooling—which feeds climate change—and socioeconomic factors, as it causes an excess in heat-related summer deaths as well as cardiorespiratory morbidity. Furthermore, urban spread will also make cities more energy-intensive places, unless more compulsory policies are applied.

To provide a better living urban environment, adjust to UHI, decrease urban energy demand, and mitigate climate change, it is of utmost importance to break this vicious circle, changing the urban and building paradigm. Buildings and urban infrastructures have to be seen not only as independent objects but also in the light of their interactions and of the mutual interactions with urban climate.

Previous research has shown that UHI mitigation measures, such as an increase in urban albedo, green walls, and green roofs, can concomitantly positively impact urban temperature and decrease building energy demand. Further, the installation of technologies to decrease building energy demand or the use of nonrenewable energy (e.g., solar panels and heat pumps) or to increase building energy efficiency can interact with the local climate. Such interactions between buildings and local climate should be captured in environmental assessments and be evaluated in a life cycle perspective.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a trustworthy tool which evaluates the impacts of goods, products, and services. LCA application avoids shifting impacts from one phase to another or from one scale to the other. Therefore, its use to evaluate the impact of the installation of UHI mitigation measures including also human health and to evaluate technologies to increase building energy efficiency is greatly encouraged to provide reliable results.

In this framework, authors looking at including in LCA methodology the interaction between UHI mitigation measures, buildings, and local climate and between building energy technologies and local climate and at assessing their impacts on the environment and on human health, including the application to case studies, are invited to submit articles for this issue.  

At present, in published literature, numerous articles can be found which offer an account of the impacts of the built environment neglecting building-local climate interactions. The aim of this issue is to bridge this gap, shedding new light on ways to improve LCA methodology applied to the urban environment, developing strategies to assess UHI mitigation plans as well as urbanization plans.

Furthermore, the Special Issue provides the opportunity for academics, practitioners, urban agencies, and planners to gain a more complete understanding of the mechanism related to the interactions between buildings and local climate, and about how to:

  • Tackle and assess such interactions;
  • Efficiently contribute to decrease the negative impacts of such interactions on both building energy use and on the environment;
  • Shape efficient urbanization plans or UHI mitigation plans relying on the advancement in LCA methodology.

Altogether, the pieces of information provided in this Special Issue are intended to provide a holistic view of the built environment to ensure a more accurate evaluation of its impacts on the environment and human health by means of the LCA methodology.

Dr. Tiziana Susca
Guest Editor

References:

  • M. Lotteau, P. Loubet, G. Sonnemann, An analysis to understand how the shape of a concrete residential building influences its embodied energy and embodied carbon, Energy and Buildings. 154 (2017) 1–11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.048.
  • T. Susca, F. Pomponi, Heat island effects in urban life cycle assessment: Novel insights to include the effects of the urban heat island and UHI-mitigation measures in LCAfor effective policy making, Journal of Industrial Ecology. (2019) 1–14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jiec.12980.
  • D. Trigaux, K. Allacker, F. De Troyer, Life Cycle Assessment of Land Use in Neighborhoods, Procedia Environmental Sciences. 38 (2017) 595–602. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.133.
  • N. Mirabella, K. Allacker, The Environmental Footprint of Cities: Insights in the Steps forward to a New Methodological Approach, Procedia Environmental Sciences. 38 (2017) 635–642. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.143.
  • S. Sen, J. Roesler, Contextual heat island assessment for pavement preservation, International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 19 (2018) 865–873. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/10298436.2016.1213842.
  • Baral, S. Sen, J.R. Roesler, Use phase assessment of photocatalytic cool pavements, Journal of Cleaner Production. 190 (2018) 722–728. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.155.
  • S. Sen, J. Roesler, Pavement Geometry in Microscale Urban Heat Islands, in: 2017. https://trid.trb.org/view/1511364 (accessed February 15, 2019).
  • E. Loiseau, G. Junqua, P. Roux, V. Bellon-Maurel, Environmental assessment of a territory: An overview of existing tools and methods, Journal of Environmental Management. 112 (2012) 213–225. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.024.
  • S.S. Clark, M.V. Chester, A Hybrid Approach for Assessing the Multi-Scale Impacts of Urban Resource Use: Transportation in Phoenix, Arizona, Journal of Industrial Ecology. 21 (2017) 136–150. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jiec.12422.
  • S. Moffatt, N. Kohler, Conceptualizing the built environment as a social–ecological system, Building Research & Information. 36 (2008) 248–268. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/09613210801928131.
  • M. Blackhurst, C. Hendrickson, H.S. Matthews, Cost-Effectiveness of Green Roofs, Journal of Architectural Engineering. 16 (2010) 136–143. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000022.
  • N.J. Santero, A. Horvath, Global warming potential of pavements, Environmental Research Letters. 4 (2009) 034011. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/034011.
  • M.W. Strohbach, E. Arnold, D. Haase, The carbon footprint of urban green space—A life cycle approach, Landscape and Urban Planning. 104 (2012) 220–229. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.013.
  • S. Saiz, C. Kennedy, B. Bass, K. Pressnail, Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Standard and Green Roofs, Environmental Science & Technology. 40 (2006) 4312–4316. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1021/es0517522.
  • K. Perini, M. Ottelé, E.M. Haas, R. Raiteri, Greening the building envelope, facade greening and living wall systems, Open Journal of Ecology. 1 (2011) 1–8. http://0-dx-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4236/oje.2011.11001.
  • E. Cubi, N.F. Zibin, S.J. Thompson, J. Bergerson, Sustainability of Rooftop Technologies in Cold Climates: Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of White Roofs, Green Roofs, and Photovoltaic Panels, Journal of Industrial Ecology. 20 (2016) 249–262. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jiec.12269.

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
  • Urban heat island (UHI)
  • Building green infrastructures
  • UHI mitigation

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 19217 KiB  
Article
The First City Organizational LCA Case Study: Feasibility and Lessons Learned from Vienna
by Alexander Cremer, Markus Berger, Katrin Müller and Matthias Finkbeiner
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 5062; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13095062 - 30 Apr 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2719
Abstract
Cities are recognized as a major contributor to environmental pressures. Recently, organizational LCA (OLCA) has been found to align well with requirements for city-scale environmental decision support and a novel city-OLCA framework was introduced. City-OLCA combines two relevant aspects: It covers activities beyond [...] Read more.
Cities are recognized as a major contributor to environmental pressures. Recently, organizational LCA (OLCA) has been found to align well with requirements for city-scale environmental decision support and a novel city-OLCA framework was introduced. City-OLCA combines two relevant aspects: It covers activities beyond public service provision (multi-stakeholder) and emissions beyond greenhouse gases (multi-impact). Its unique approach of acknowledging responsibility levels should help both city-managers and academia in performance tracking and to prioritize mitigation measures. The goal of this work is to test city-OLCA’s feasibility in a first case study with real city data from Vienna. The feasibility was confirmed, and results for 12 impact categories were obtained. As an example, Vienna’s global warming potential, ozone depletion potential, and marine eutrophication potential for 2016 were 14,686 kt CO2 eq., 6796 kg CFC-11 eq., and 310 t N eq., respectively. Our results indicate that current accounting practices may underestimate greenhouse gas emissions of the entire city by up to a factor of 3. This is mainly due to additional activities not covered by conventional standards (food and goods consumption). While the city itself only accounts for 25% of greenhouse gases, 75% are caused by activities beyond public service provision or beyond governmental responsibilities. Based on our results, we encourage city managers to include an organizational based LCA approach in defining reduction strategies. This will reveal environmental blind spots and avoids underestimating environmental burdens, which might lead to setting the wrong focus for mitigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Cycle Analysis and Urban Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2594 KiB  
Article
Life Cycle Analysis of a Game-Based Solution for Domestic Energy Saving
by Marta Gangolells, Miquel Casals, Núria Forcada and Marcel Macarulla
Sustainability 2020, 12(17), 6699; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12176699 - 19 Aug 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1887
Abstract
ICT-based solutions are seen to be almost totally environmentally friendly, but game-based solutions for energy saving have not been explored yet. This paper describes a comprehensive analysis and an in-depth interpretation of the life cycle environmental impact of a game-based solution for domestic [...] Read more.
ICT-based solutions are seen to be almost totally environmentally friendly, but game-based solutions for energy saving have not been explored yet. This paper describes a comprehensive analysis and an in-depth interpretation of the life cycle environmental impact of a game-based solution for domestic energy saving, developed and validated within the EU-funded Horizon 2020 project EnerGAware—Energy Game for Awareness of energy efficiency in social housing communities. Life cycle impacts were calculated with SimaPRO 8.5.2.0 using the ReCiPe 2016 v1.02 midpoint and endpoint methods and information contained within the Ecoinvent v3.4 database. Although the pre-competitive solution, directly arising from the research project, was found to have a relatively high environmental impact, its future exploitation, which mostly relies on existing infrastructure, was found to be highly competitive from an environmental perspective. The game will help reduce the life cycle impact of domestic energy consumption on damage to human health (3.68%), ecosystem quality (3.87%), and resource availability (4.81%). Most of the environmental impact of the market solution was found in the manufacturing phase (77.96–80.12%). Transport (8.86–7.57%), use (3.86–5.82%), and maintenance (7.24–7.54%) phases were found to contribute little to environmental impact. This research provides a useful reference for decision-making as it contributes to the environmental benchmarking of competing energy-saving strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Cycle Analysis and Urban Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop