sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

How Masterplanning and Urban Design Practice Contribute to Promoting Sustainability?

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Urban and Rural Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2021) | Viewed by 6379

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Sciences (Architecture and Urban Planning), University of Dundee, Scotland, UK
Interests: master planning; urban design practice; sustainability assessment; stakeholder engagement; placemaking; evidence-based decision-making; co-production
Eclipse Research, Cambridge, UK
Interests: sustainability, stakeholder engagement, co-production, evaluation, evidence-based decision-making

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social Sciences (Architecture + Urban Planning), University of Dundee, Scotland, UK
Interests: Community engagement; master planning

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent years, there has been a revival of interest in the use of masterplanning, as evidenced in planning practice and wider urban design discourse. This revival has occurred at a time of significant demographic and social change, widespread economic stagnation, reduced resources and growing concerns about the impact of climate change in many parts of the world. The justification for masterplanning that has emerged is no longer simply due to the age-old desire to create a blueprint of the future uses and the appearance of a site or a place. Increasingly, masterplanning is seen as a means of improving the prospects for securing survival in the face of volatile social, economic, technological and environmental sustainability at this point in the 21st century—of ensuring future sustainability.

Sustainability implies creating a secure sense of long-term vitality (Watson, 2009). Sustainable thinking has begun to influence all aspects of development, from the built form to financial, economic and social policies, and their delivery mechanisms.  Carter (2007) argued that “sustainable development does not just happen as an outcome in a predetermined way. It requires to be carefully discussed, openly debated and perhaps even centrally planned”. Despite its long gestation, this concept still needs to be translated into real and tangible design solutions if neighbourhoods, towns and cities are to avoid serious problems and high costs in the future. It is important, therefore, to rethink how urban design practice in general, and masterplanning in particular, can contribute to sustainability by challenging underlying assumptions, reflecting on the effectiveness of decision-making and implementation processes deployed, and by learning from hard-won practical experiences from around the world. This Special Issue offers an opportunity to collate this experience and to learn from practice what has and has not worked. 

 The intention is to capture national and international material of relevance to academics, policy- makers, and built environment practitioners. The Special Issue will draw together a collection of high-quality evidence-based papers, discussing relevant theory, research and practice on topics such as adaptive and synergetic masterplanning, masterplanning for change, the integration of resilience and sustainability into masterplanning, collaboration and co-production in masterplanning, and typological and plot-based masterplanning. We encourage researchers and practitioners to submit original research articles, case studies, and critical articles on topics including, but not limited to the following:

  • the evolution and future of sustainable masterplanning and urban design practice;
  • the integration of concepts such as resilience and sustainability into master planning;
  • the use of masterplanning and urban design practice to promote a ‘sustainable neighbourhood’;
  • from masterplanning to adaptive planning;
  • typological and plot based masterplanning;
  • collaboration and co-production with communities in master planning;
  • the development of more resilient masterplanning that can adapt to change and uncertainty;
  • the use of integrated approaches to masterplanning to promote wellbeing in terms of social capital, health and quality of life;
  • sustainable masterplanning ‘value’ and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes;
  • the role of sustainability assessment in the masterplanning process;
  • the new types of professionalism required to reconcile the conflicting demands placed upon sustainable master planning;
  • case studies: successes as well as failures, and stories.

 Particular attention should be paid to demonstrating, through robust evidence bases, how masterplanning has, in practice, contributed to the delivery of increased sustainability.

Dr. Husam AlWaer
Dr. Ian Cooper
Mrs. Barbara Illsley
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • masterplanning
  • adaptive planning
  • sustainability
  • resilient masterplanning
  • sustainable neighbourhood
  • sustainability assessment
  • plot-based masterplanning
  • new professionalism
  • evidence-based decision-making

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 4892 KiB  
Article
Approaching Sustainability in Local Spatial Planning Processes: A Case Study in the Stockholm Region, Sweden
by Johan Högström, Peter Brokking, Berit Balfors and Monica Hammer
Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2601; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13052601 - 01 Mar 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2810
Abstract
The quest for cogent responses to sustainability goals challenges local spatial planning practices across growing metropolitan regions to develop planning approaches that enable transformative capacity in increasingly complex settings. Based on a case study conducted in the Stockholm region, this paper explores the [...] Read more.
The quest for cogent responses to sustainability goals challenges local spatial planning practices across growing metropolitan regions to develop planning approaches that enable transformative capacity in increasingly complex settings. Based on a case study conducted in the Stockholm region, this paper explores the design and organization of local planning processes to provide a basis for a discussion of alternative approaches that may enhance sustainability in plan and project development. More specifically, it aims to analyze the conditions for embedding and consolidating sustainability issues in local planning processes. The results show that the municipalities need to create conditions for an effective interplay between the planning work carried out in individual projects and the organization of resources, knowledge, and skills on which the projects depend to handle sustainability issues. This study contributes to the understanding of the challenges associated with putting sustainability into practice at the local level by identifying and conceptualizing three important barriers. By acknowledging the temporal, locational, and procedural dimensions of knowledge in local planning processes, planning practices may become better at knowing when, and in what ways, different forms of knowledge can become created, introduced, and used in a synergistic manner to aid the realization of sustainability goals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4766 KiB  
Article
Changing the Focus: Viewing Design-Led Events within Collaborative Planning
by Husam AlWaer and Ian Cooper
Sustainability 2020, 12(8), 3365; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12083365 - 21 Apr 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2968
Abstract
Design-led planning events typically seek to involve stakeholders in collaborative decision-making about their built environment. In the literature, such events are often treated as one-off or standalone. In this paper, which draws on a survey of the experience of stakeholders involved in them, [...] Read more.
Design-led planning events typically seek to involve stakeholders in collaborative decision-making about their built environment. In the literature, such events are often treated as one-off or standalone. In this paper, which draws on a survey of the experience of stakeholders involved in them, design-led events are seen in the context of, and in relation to, the collaborative planning process as a whole. Such events are portrayed as being critically affected by how they are instigated; how they are framed; how they are conducted; and, just as importantly, how they are implemented. Three separable strands of activity in collaborative planning processes are identified—design, stakeholder management, and event facilitation—along with the roles played in each of those by those responsible for initiating and then maintaining the engagement and enrolment of participating stakeholder groups in collaborative decision-making. Based on the captured experience of those who have participated in them, the value of design-led events is portrayed not as standing alone but as being crucially dependent on (a) prior decisions made long before any participants gather to engage in them and (b) subsequent decisions made long after the participants have departed. The originality of this paper lies in a desire to begin to construct an empirical base that can be employed for discussing and recommending improvements to collaborative planning processes. The three strands of activity identified by event participants—design, stakeholder management, and facilitation—may individually be relatively weak. But their contributions to collaborative planning can be strengthened by being bound tightly together into a more integrated and coherent whole. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop