sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Rebuilding Communities Following Disasters and Conflict-Induced Mass Displacements

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Hazards and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2021) | Viewed by 9948

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
Interests: local governance; disaster resilience in the built environment; displacements; rebuilding communities; resilient cities; urbanisation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
Interests: urban planning and urban design innovations for disaster resilience; built environment perspective of displacement; sustainable shared spaces and public open spaces; resilient cities

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre, Bangkok, Thailand
Interests: disaster risk management; recovery and reconstruction; institutional system & capacity development; environmental impact assessment

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Disaster Risk Management at the University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
Interests: disaster risk reduction in the built environment—understanding disaster risk; preparedness for response and post-disaster reconstruction; gender-responsive disaster risk reduction; women as a force in resilience building; gender equality in DRR; disaster resilience from the perspective of the social/political; economic and physical sciences; social impact of reconstruction; capacity building for disaster mitigation and reconstruction; post-conflict reconstruction; women in construction
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Disaster events such as earthquakes, windstorms, landslides, floods, tsunami and conflicts are among the well-known causes that generate and aggravate displacements. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) reports that 59.5 million individuals were forcibly displaced in 2014, but this amount had risen to 70.8 million by the end of 2018. According to UNHCR, the drastic increase of forced displacement was concentrated between 2012 and 2017 mainly due to the Syrian conflict, other conflicts in the region, conflicts in sub-Saharan Africa and the inflow of Rohingya refugees to Bangladesh. The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) highlights that Philippines and China have the largest amount of internal displacement due to disasters, with each having 3.8 million newly displaced in 2018, followed by India (2.7 million), and the United States (1.2 million). Following a disaster and conflict-induced displacement, resettement and relocation are integral parts of the recovery process. The most popular aspect of the recovery process is addressing the physical needs of the displaced community which may vary from providing basic necessities such as food, water, sanitary facilities to new houses and infrastructure facilities. Based on that assumption, ways to determine the success of resettlement are discussed, however superficially in some of the literature (Sridarran, 2018). However, this process goes beyond addressing the physical needs of the communities. It also includes addressing socio-cultural, livelihood and economic aspects of their lives (Amaratunga et.al, 2020). Relocation and resettlement often introduces a new built environment for the displaced communities which changes the pattern of the interaction among the displaced community and also with the host community. This will reshape the social system, resulting either in social cohesion or social tension. The way the built environment is reshaped can influence the mental wellbeing of communities and create social cohesion between the host and displaced. In contrast, failure regarding built environment has been recorded based on the inappropriate house design, insufficient infrastructure, and inappropriate new environment resulting social tension among the communities (Jayakody et al. 2020). Further,  economic status of the displaced community (IDMC, 2018), bureaucratic tendencies of the government and issues of discrimination (Annunziata, 2020) are also recorded as reasons for failures linked with changes in the built environment. The built environment has an instrumental role to play in all theses aspects which includes physical, psychological, socio-cultural, institutional, environmental and economic. Accordingly, the aim of this Special Issue is to gather knowledge in rebuilding communities following disaster and conflict-induced mass displacements from the perspective of the built environment.

Dr. Chamindi Malalgoda
Dr. Chathuranganee Jayakody
Mr. Sisira Madurapperuma
Prof. Dilanthi Amaratunga
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • displacement
  • built environment
  • resettlements
  • community
  • rebuilding communities
  • social cohesion

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 2449 KiB  
Article
Approaches to Strengthen the Social Cohesion between Displaced and Host Communities
by Chathuranganee Jayakody, Chamindi Malalgoda, Dilanthi Amaratunga, Richard Haigh, Champika Liyanage, Emlyn Witt, Mo Hamza and Nishara Fernando
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3413; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14063413 - 14 Mar 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3654
Abstract
A cohesive society is not only characterised by the availability of basic services and facilities, but also promotes economic equality and inclusion, democracy, and social solidarity. Forced displacement due to disasters and conflict constantly disrupt the path to a sustainable and cohesive society. [...] Read more.
A cohesive society is not only characterised by the availability of basic services and facilities, but also promotes economic equality and inclusion, democracy, and social solidarity. Forced displacement due to disasters and conflict constantly disrupt the path to a sustainable and cohesive society. Displaced communities often struggle with a lack of access to livelihood and a lack of financial independence and social and family stability. With these challenges, a lack of provision of basic services and facilities will create a competition for housing, health, and education between the displaced and host communities. Additionally, the economic competition for jobs and the role of international aid in terms of fairness create social tension between the displaced and the host. Likewise, multiple aspects weaken the social cohesion between displaced and host communities. Within this context, we investigated approaches to enhance social cohesion following disaster-induced and conflict-induced displacement. With the identification of this research need, the research team of the project titled REGARD (REbuild-inG AfteR Displacement) conducted 47 in-depth interviews in four partner countries (U.K., Sweden, Estonia, and Sri Lanka) with community representatives, social support networks, agency networks, officials, etc. Moreover, focus group discussions were conducted with community members in Sri Lanka. The collected data were analysed through a qualitative data analysis procedure. The findings present eight approaches to strengthen the social cohesion between displaced and host communities. These eight approaches include the adequate provision of basic services and facilities without limiting the capacity of the host, support services aimed at local integration, economic integration between the displaced and host, and social cohesion through the built environment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 270 KiB  
Article
Landslide Induced Displacement and Relocation Options: A Case Study of Owner Driven Settings in Sri Lanka
by Anuradha Senanayake, Nishara Fernando, Maduri Wasana, Dilanthi Amaratunga, Richard Haigh, Chamindi Malalgoda and Chathuranganee Jayakody
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1906; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14031906 - 08 Feb 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2071
Abstract
Disaster induced displacement is one of the most frequent phenomena occurring in the contemporary world and has been aggravated by factors such as climate change. With the systematic interpretation of disaster risks, planned relocation has been recognized as a durable solution for post-disaster [...] Read more.
Disaster induced displacement is one of the most frequent phenomena occurring in the contemporary world and has been aggravated by factors such as climate change. With the systematic interpretation of disaster risks, planned relocation has been recognized as a durable solution for post-disaster reconstruction and disaster mitigation. Planned relocation initiatives that have been executed as post-disaster reconstruction initiatives in Sri Lanka have mainly followed donor driven and owner driven approaches. This study is a comparative analysis of the status quo of owner driven relocation options that were implemented after the landslide which took place in 2016 in the X District of Sri Lanka. Two research fields were selected based on the two owner driven options as part of the selected case study: Government Resettlement Sites and Individual Resettlement Sites. This exploratory study utilizes both secondary and primary data. A purposive sample of ten households was selected from each setting to conduct in-depth interviews. Furthermore, five structured interviews with key informants were conducted using an expert sample. Secondary data were collected based on the concepts of relocation and satisfaction of housing. The findings suggest that the respondents were satisfied with the housing units in both settings despite concerns in relation to the suggested plans of the housing units. Furthermore, common concerns were raised in terms of delays and issues in fund management in construction of houses. However, there was a drastic disparity in terms of other infrastructural, public, and neighborhood facilities in the two settings. Hence, this study suggests the need for an overall management and monitoring strategy for all owner driven relocation options. Full article
20 pages, 1281 KiB  
Article
Refugees’ Integration in the Built Environment: The Sweden Case
by Mo Hamza
Sustainability 2021, 13(22), 12812; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132212812 - 19 Nov 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3314
Abstract
The resettlement and integration of a displaced population into a new society faces a plethora of challenges. These range from lack of national legal frameworks to plan and implement planned relocation, to the absence of a long-term vision, inadequate funds, and poor institutional [...] Read more.
The resettlement and integration of a displaced population into a new society faces a plethora of challenges. These range from lack of national legal frameworks to plan and implement planned relocation, to the absence of a long-term vision, inadequate funds, and poor institutional structures. The 3-year EU Erasmus+ funded REGARD Project (REbuildinG AfteR Displacement) set out to address some of these challenges and develop guidance with a focus on the roles and responsibilities of the host and the resettled community in order to understand the needs of both. This paper focuses on the Swedish experience (one of four case studies in the project) in the aftermath of the mass influx of Syrian refugees in 2015. A needs assessment conceptual framework of both host and displaced communities guided the multi-method approach applied in the Sweden case where data was drawn from a scoped literature review on issues related to integration and social cohesion complimented and validated by in-depth interviews with a number of municipalities and non-governmental organizations all working with asylum seekers resettlement. The results of the research indicate that while the Swedish case was a relative success by comparison to others in Europe, there was still systemic shortcomings that needed attention. First, cooperation and coordination between government and non-governmental actors and at different levels up and down the chain of services provided for resettled refugees is still lacking where the reality on the ground is not fully grasped by centrally driven policy and decision-making. Second, what determines the effectiveness of resettlement and integration efforts is focusing on the individuality of each displacee’s needs and circumstances where one-size does not fit all, and recognizing that integration is a two-way process that has to involve both host and guest community and not simply the absorption of one into the other. Finally, the paper concludes that the pressured and often highly politicized situations both host and guest community are put into usually force rapid responses, while long-term visions and sustainable solutions when adequate time is taken to establish trust and build viable networks between the two communities can lead to far better results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop