sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability and Human Resources Management

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2022) | Viewed by 33622

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
IDOCAL (Research Institute of Human Resources Psychology, Organizational Development, and Quality of Working Life), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Interests: human resource management; human resource development; sustainability; safety culture and safety performance; mindful organizing for safety; high-reliability organizations; high-risk industries; employability; psychological contract

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

Since the late 1980s, sustainability and sustainable development issues have been prominent features on global political and social agendas. Organizations have been pressured to adopt a long-term sustainable approach to business and include environmental and social goals in their corporate strategy, in addition to the traditional economical goals. This sets a triple bottom line able to satisfy the demands of a wider set of stakeholders. The human resources function of organizations has been identified as a key driver in implementing and achieving the corporate sustainability strategy. This has led to the rise of sustainable human resource management (SHRM)—an extension of strategic human resource management. Although research on SHRM has grown immensely in recent years, especially in the last decade, it is still in an emerging phase. Because of this, the aim of this Special Issue is to increase the theoretical and empirical body of knowledge about SHRM, so that SHRM can progress to “find its feet”.

We are especially interested in the human side of SHRM, which has been largely neglected in SHRM research. Two roles are distinguished in SHRM: the role of human resource management (HRM) in developing sustainable organizations by contributing to the achievement of the corporate sustainability strategy, and the role of HRM in developing sustainable HRM systems. Human resource management needs to both provide HR solutions to become a sustainable organization as well as manage the HR function in a sustainable way.

Regarding the first role, conceptualization and empirical research about corporate sustainability strategies rarely includes human sustainability goals, in addition to environmental, social, and economic goals. Since Pfeffer (2010) asked the provocative question “why are polar bears or even milk jugs more important than people?”, not much has changed in research or practice to adequately include human sustainability on the sustainability agenda.

Regarding the second role, sustainability means engaging more actively in the renewal, regeneration, and reproduction of resources that organizations need to survive in the long term. However, the role of SHRM to sustain the human resource base has received very scarce attention in research. We do not know much about whether, how, and when SHRM contributes to the renewal, regeneration, and reproduction of human resources. We also have not explored when SHRM becomes a self-sustaining system, able to consume less resources than can be reproduced. Furthermore, challenges such as stress at work, health and safety problems, equity and diversity, work–life balance, or the implications of the digital age and emerging new technologies on employees are extremely relevant for SHRM. In the face of these challenges, companies should rethink HRM if they want to retain and renew their employee base to run their business in future. In this vein, the inclusion of human sustainability goals in the corporate sustainability strategy can be critical.

The human resource management literature contains many calls for bringing humanity back into HRM. We encourage researchers to reflect on what the point of HRM is without human goals (e.g., employees’ well-being, health, development, and growth), or if it is it enough for SHRM to pursue these human goals as means to an end (e.g., sustainable economic or environmental performance). Whether it is a matter of putting employees at the center of SHRM as some have claimed, or just of appearing as a feature of SHRM on the same level as economic, social, and environmental goals, we hope HRM stops “Searching for the Human in Human Resource Management” (Bolton and Houlihan, 2007). In this vein, we are convinced that SHRM offers great opportunities for practitioners and researchers to contribute to environmental, economic, social, and human sustainability. In this Special Issue, we hope to encourage addressing these questions and to lay out a roadmap for researchers to follow in the future.

For this Special issue, we will consider original research papers of empirical and conceptual nature as well as reviews. This Special Issue is focused on, but not limited to, the following topics:

- New theoretical developments in defining social and human sustainability in organizations.

- The development of corporate social and human sustainability indicators and metrics.

- The development and quantitative validation of measures for SHRM policies and practices.

- The development of measures for employees’ sustainable behaviors.

- The role of SHRM in the formulation and implementation of corporate sustainability strategies.

- Links between SHRM practices, employees’ sustainable behaviors, and sustainability outcomes.

- The impact of contextual factors on SHRM policies and practices.

- Drivers and barriers to SHRM.

- SHRM and the renewal, regeneration, and reproduction of human resources.

- SHRM as a self-sustaining system.

- Relationship between SHRM practices and human sustainability outcomes.

- Sustainable leadership and sustainable employees.

- Challenges related to the digital age and new emerging technologies for SHRM.

Prof. Dr. Francisco J. Gracia
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Sustainability and human resource management
  • Sustainable human resource management
  • Environmental, social, economic, and human sustainability
  • SHRM policies and practices
  • Corporate sustainability strategy and SHRM
  • SHRM and the human resource base
  • Sustainable careers
  • Sustainable leadership
  • “Sustainable” employees
  • Employees’ sustainable behaviors
  • Digital age and SHRM

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 621 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Corporate Greenwashing on Employees’ Environmental Performance: Person–Organization Values Fit Perspective
by Guosen Miao, Guoping Chen, Fan Wang and Anupam Kumar Das
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 3498; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15043498 - 14 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2795
Abstract
In the present study, we construct a model of greenwashing on employees’ environmental performance based on person–organization fit theory. Path analysis and hierarchical regression methods were used to examine randomly selected data collected from 269 employees in eight Chinese gas service and chemical [...] Read more.
In the present study, we construct a model of greenwashing on employees’ environmental performance based on person–organization fit theory. Path analysis and hierarchical regression methods were used to examine randomly selected data collected from 269 employees in eight Chinese gas service and chemical production companies. The results of the analysis reveal that employees’ perceived person–organization values fit mediates the relationship between organizational greenwashing and employees’ environmental performance; employees’ environmental beliefs not only positively moderate the relationship between corporate greenwashing behavior and employees’ perceived person–organization values fit, but also positively moderate the indirect effect of employees’ perceived person–organization values fit between organizational greenwashing and employees’ environmental performance. We provide some theoretical contributions to organizational greenwashing, and practical implications are also offered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Human Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 995 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Human Resource Management and Generational Diversity: The Importance of the Age Management Pillars
by Natália Vraňaková, Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová and Andrea Chlpeková
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8496; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13158496 - 29 Jul 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 6363
Abstract
The issue of population aging is currently highly topical. In the context of population aging, age management comes to the fore. It addresses the management of human resources with regard to the age and potential of employees. The main aim of the article [...] Read more.
The issue of population aging is currently highly topical. In the context of population aging, age management comes to the fore. It addresses the management of human resources with regard to the age and potential of employees. The main aim of the article is to present the results of research focused on the importance of age management pillars from the perspective of employees from different generational groups in industrial enterprises in Slovakia. Based on established research questions and the research hypothesis, we can state that the perceived importance of age management pillars differs depending on the affiliation to the generational group. The research hypothesis was confirmed, and we conclude that there is a dependence between generational groups of employees from industrial enterprises in Slovakia and the importance of the age management pillars (the number of designations in a pairwise comparison). As a data collection tool, a research questionnaire was created. Collected data were evaluated based on a pairwise comparison of the perceived importance of age management pillars for employees. The research sample consisted of N = 384 respondents (employees of large industrial enterprises in Slovakia). When considering the research results, the use allows approaching the management of different generations of employees directly within the framework of sustainable human resource management. The research problem is also supported by resources and theoretical background. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Human Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1038 KiB  
Article
Do National Values of Culture and Sustainability Influence Direct Employee PDM Levels and Scope? The Search for a European Answer
by Marta Valverde-Moreno, Mercedes Torres-Jiménez, Ana M. Lucia-Casademunt and Ana María Pacheco-Martínez
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 8016; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148016 - 18 Jul 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2849
Abstract
The dynamic development of the global economy has led to the creation of agile and innovative organizations that need to adapt rapidly to new challenges. For that reason, organizations need to make decisions that help them face uncertain situations and be successful. Research [...] Read more.
The dynamic development of the global economy has led to the creation of agile and innovative organizations that need to adapt rapidly to new challenges. For that reason, organizations need to make decisions that help them face uncertain situations and be successful. Research has demonstrated that employee participative decision making (PDM) promotes more innovative, flexible, and sustainable organizations. The present paper examines organizational, cultural, and sustainable factors to discover how these variables affect PDM in the European context. For this purpose, this study focuses on two main objectives: (1) analyzing the impact of a country’s cultural and institutional values (macro level), beyond individual and organizational characteristics (micro and meso levels), on the adoption of PDM in the European context and (2) differentiating among the types of decisions for which employee participation is considered (operational or organizational). To attain these goals, three hierarchical fitted regression models were fitted using data based on the Sixth European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) and complemented with information from Hofstede’s dimensions, whose scores are obtained from 2010 Hofstede database, and institutional values from the 2015 World Competitive Yearbook (WCY). Results demonstrate that some cultural values are significant for PDM and that sustainability is related to employee participation at the general and operational levels. This allows the conclusion that organizations located in countries with greater sustainability awareness are also those that promote employee participation the most. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Human Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 783 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Socially Responsible HRM on Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Proactive Motivation Model
by Junqian He and Hyosun Kim
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7958; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13147958 - 16 Jul 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3886
Abstract
Many organizations face the important challenges of motivating employees effectively to participate in corporate social responsibility initiatives and maintaining socially responsible human resource management practices. We examine whether socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) practices can affect employees’ social responsibility-related behaviors, such as [...] Read more.
Many organizations face the important challenges of motivating employees effectively to participate in corporate social responsibility initiatives and maintaining socially responsible human resource management practices. We examine whether socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) practices can affect employees’ social responsibility-related behaviors, such as organizational citizenship behavior for the environment (OCBE). Based on proactive motivation theory, we propose a multiple-mediation model, selecting moral efficacy, felt obligation, and empathy as the mediators. We analyzed data from a sample of 535 employees from 23 manufacturing companies in China. The results show that SRHRM practices have a significant positive effect on OCBE. We also found that moral efficacy, felt obligation, and empathy significantly mediate the effect of SRHRM practices on OCBE and that there is no significant difference among the three mediation paths. Our study suggests that organizational pursuit of the socially responsible human resource management practices is an effective pathway to make employees feel more responsible toward global sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Human Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 868 KiB  
Article
Speaking Up about Workplace Safety: An Experimental Study on Safety Leadership
by Andrea Bazzoli, Matteo Curcuruto, James I. Morgan, Margherita Brondino and Margherita Pasini
Sustainability 2020, 12(18), 7458; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12187458 - 10 Sep 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3837
Abstract
In this study, we test whether different types of safety leadership styles predict different employees’ change-oriented discretionary communications about safety (i.e., safety voice) after controlling for proactive personality disposition to improve organizational sustainability. Building upon a multidimensional model of safety voice, which attempts [...] Read more.
In this study, we test whether different types of safety leadership styles predict different employees’ change-oriented discretionary communications about safety (i.e., safety voice) after controlling for proactive personality disposition to improve organizational sustainability. Building upon a multidimensional model of safety voice, which attempts to conceptualize different ways in which employees make suggestions about safety procedures, we developed four realistic scenarios in which we manipulated the supervisor’s safety leadership style, including: (1) transformational safety leadership, (2) transactional safety leadership, (3) passive safety leadership, and (4) control group (i.e., no leadership at all). We randomly assigned 103 participants to two of four scenarios and measured four facets of safety voice and proactive personality dispositions. The findings showed that after controlling for the respondents’ proactive personality, transformative safety leadership predicted promotive safety voice, transactional safety leadership predicted preventive safety voice, and passive safety leadership predicted hostile safety voice. These findings have a number of implications for our understanding of safety leadership and employees’ safety communications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Human Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 1408 KiB  
Review
How Does Research on Sustainable Human Resource Management Contribute to Corporate Sustainability: A Document Co-Citation Analysis, 1982–2021
by Astrid Kainzbauer, Parisa Rungruang and Philip Hallinger
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11745; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132111745 - 24 Oct 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4077
Abstract
While the field of human resource management (HRM) has a long research tradition, the focus on sustainability has only gained momentum since the turn of the millennium. This bibliometric review examined key documents that inform scholarship in sustainable human resource management (S-HRM). The [...] Read more.
While the field of human resource management (HRM) has a long research tradition, the focus on sustainability has only gained momentum since the turn of the millennium. This bibliometric review examined key documents that inform scholarship in sustainable human resource management (S-HRM). The review identified 807 Scopus-indexed documents on sustainability in human resource management published between 1982 and 2021. Bibliometric analyses applied to this database included document citation and co-citation analysis to map peer-recognized documents. The review documented an emerging knowledge base that is global in scope with contributions from a variety of regions in the world. Three ‘invisible colleges’ emerged in the visual map of co-cited documents. These include green human resource management (Green HRM) with a focus on environmental aspects of sustainability, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and S-HRM with a focus on analyzing all three aspects of the triple bottom line of corporate output. These document analyses found that this emerging literature on S-HRM is heavily weighted towards environmental concerns. The authors recommend that greater attention be placed on the contributions that HRM makes to the human and social aspects of sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Human Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 996 KiB  
Review
Unshrouding the Sphere from the Clouds: Towards a Comprehensive Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Employability
by Bram P. I. Fleuren, Andries de Grip, Nicole W. H. Jansen, IJmert Kant and Fred R. H. Zijlstra
Sustainability 2020, 12(16), 6366; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12166366 - 07 Aug 2020
Cited by 40 | Viewed by 6382
Abstract
Sustainable employability refers to individuals’ long-term abilities to work and remain employed. Despite its societal importance in the light of aging populations and rapidly changing skill demands, sustainable employability still requires further definition and conceptualization. As such, the present paper aims to define [...] Read more.
Sustainable employability refers to individuals’ long-term abilities to work and remain employed. Despite its societal importance in the light of aging populations and rapidly changing skill demands, sustainable employability still requires further definition and conceptualization. As such, the present paper aims to define and conceptualize sustainable employability comprehensively by reviewing existing studies on the concept. Additionally, the paper discusses and integrates sustainable employment, sustainable work, and sustainable work ability into our broad framework of sustainable employability. The resulting conceptual framework positions sustainable employability as an inherently longitudinal multidimensional individual characteristic that is the outcome of complex interactions between individual-, work- and work environmental characteristics. This framework enables researchers to identify the employment characteristics that promote sustainable employability and thereby comprise sustainable employment. Finally, the framework links to notions of person-environment fit, and job- and organizational design to create a basis for future research on sustainable employability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Human Resources Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop