sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability vs Food Safety: What Are the Trade-Offs

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability in Geographic Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2022) | Viewed by 4592

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Marketing, BI Norwegian Business School, 0484 Oslo, Norway
Interests: consumer behavior, food safety, risk perception, risk communication, marketing, innovation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
National Food Chain Safety Office, H-1024 Budapest, Hungary
Interests: consumer behavior, food safety, risk perception, risk communication, food marketing

Special Issue Information

Dear colleagues, 

Consumers’ food practices consist of many trade-offs. Some trade taste for low fat, other offer convenience for control, or money for quality. Retailers and food producers have their trade-offs in relation to placement, shelf life, product quality, labeling, production cost, etc. In this Special Issue of Sustainability, we want to focus on one specific trade-off: sustainability vs. food safety. We welcome papers that empirically investigate this trade-off from consumers’, retailers’, or food manufacturers’ point of view. 

Food production contributes to a significant share of total greenhouse gas emissions and energy use globally (Hanssen et al. 2017). Food production requires resources and has an adverse impact on the environment, whether it is consumed or not (Kasza et al. 2020). A more sustainable food system that results in less food waste will therefore have a positive impact on the global environmental footprint, and may also influence the economy, food security, and the fight against hunger (Lemaire and Limbourge, 2019). 

While reduction of waste in the food chain is clearly an important sustainability issue, some of the seemingly obvious solutions can potentially raise the food safety risk by setting aside well set food safety rules (Kasza et al. 2019).  Since food borne illnesses account for about 600 million cases of illness and 420,000 deaths globally every year (World Health Organization, 2015), it is problematic if food safety is traded off for sustainability. Consumer handling in the store or at home causes 40% of all food borne outbreaks (EFSA, 2015). Accordingly, it is important to understand not only if and how retailers and food producers, but also consumers, trade off food safety for sustainability. 

We welcome papers that look specifically at the sustainability-food safety trade-offs along the whole value chain from production to consumption. For example, a non-exclusive list of relevant topics follows:

  • Labelling and marketing campaigns effect on consumers sustainability and food safety trade-off
  • Suboptimal food and food safety
  • Sustainable food handling practices (in production, retail, or by consumers’) effect on food safety.
  • Consumers sensory evaluation of food waste and food safety
  • At-risk groups trade-offs of food safety and sustainability
  • Sustainability and food safety beliefs effect on behavior.
  • Food packaging and food safety
  • Sustainability and safety trade-offs within retail and distribution
  • Circular economy and food safety

Prof. Dr. Nina Veflen
Dr. Gyula Kasza
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 4330 KiB  
Article
Impact of Optimized Packaging on Food Waste Prevention Potential among Consumers
by Gudrun Obersteiner, Marta Cociancig, Sandra Luck and Johannes Mayerhofer
Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4209; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13084209 - 09 Apr 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3389
Abstract
Food and plastic waste are cited as major environmental challenges. The function of packaging is often overlooked when considering waste; however, food packaging is indispensable for hygienic protection during transport and distribution within the supply chain. An important way to prevent the premature [...] Read more.
Food and plastic waste are cited as major environmental challenges. The function of packaging is often overlooked when considering waste; however, food packaging is indispensable for hygienic protection during transport and distribution within the supply chain. An important way to prevent the premature spoilage of a variety of different food product groups is to use specially optimized packaging systems. These are able to provide a high level of protection and actively extend shelf life. However, even if novel packaging systems theoretically have great potential for waste reduction, it remains uncertain whether they will also be accepted at the consumer level and actually contribute to waste reduction within households. Three different methods were used to clarify consumers’ perceptions of optimized packaging and thus the potential impact on waste generation. General perceptions have been identified by means of quantitative research among 1117 consumers. Precise information on waste generation behavior was obtained by means of food diaries. Consumer simulations were used to analyze the extent to which optimized packaging can actually have a positive effect on food waste generation at the household level. It was found that the functionality of the packaging usually ceases with the consumer. Consumers are only marginally aware of the advantages of food product packaging in the household, and do not perceive the direct connection between packaging, freshness, shelf life, and spoilage as food waste. In general, consumers rarely or never use optimized packaging at home correctly. It could be concluded that consumers’ perceptions of optimized packaging in terms of potential food waste prevention are not pronounced. In summary, it can be stated that in contrast to its use in retail and transport, an optimization of packaging to avoid food waste for later use by the consumer only shows an effect in exceptional cases, or can only be achieved through targeted information campaigns. If this should be a focus topic in the future, either on the political or managerial level, this has to be taken into account. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability vs Food Safety: What Are the Trade-Offs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop