sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Finance and Value Creation

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2022) | Viewed by 39849

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
ISEG – Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Universidade de Lisboa, P-1200078 Lisbon, Portugal
Interests: corporate finance; shareholder value creation; corporate taxation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
ISEG – Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Universidade de Lisboa, P-1200078 Lisbon, Portugal
Interests: corporate finance; public–private partnerships; project finance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Lisbon School of Economics & Management (ISEG), Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal
Interests: corporate governance; investment appraisal; social innovation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainable finance is increasingly on the agenda of policy setters, regulators, managers, and academics. This Special Issue focuses on value creation by three main actors: companies, regulators, and asset managers. Companies are incorporating ESG indicators in their strategic plans, while metrics for measuring ESG have been emerging (Diez-Cañamero et al., 2020). The literature is still scarce in terms of understanding what drives these initiatives by managers to incorporate ESG practices (Crespi and Migliavacca, 2020). The consequences for stakeholders also constitute a topic that calls for more research, in particular, whether an investment in ESG creates value for shareholders. Recent studies have mainly focused on the effects of ESG investment on performance, although many other finance-related topics may be analyzed through an ESG lens (Friede et al., 2015; Ellili, 2020; Del Giudice and Rigamonti, 2020; Matos et al., 2020). We welcome submissions focusing on the company level.

Regulators have also dedicated attention to ESG metrics. The Paris Agreement on climate change is one of many examples in this field. Following the agreement, green financing has gained relevance as a mechanism for companies to expand their sources of funding and to fund at a lower cost. Studies on green financing are welcome, regarding either its determinants or its consequences.

The number of investment funds with an environmental philosophy has also increased over the past few years. Research papers in this field have analyzed how such investments affect portfolios’ risk and return, and the rapid increase in the supply of ESG-related investments opens room for assessing whether these investments affect stock returns and create value for shareholders (Chen et al., 2017; La Torre et al., 2020). Fewer investment funds have a philosophy related to the other pillars of ESG, such as a social philosophy. We also invite contributions from authors interested in value creation from an asset management perspective.

Therefore, possible paper topics include but are not limited to:

  • Determinants of a company’s investments in ESG
  • Effects of ESG investment on a company’s performance and financing
  • ESG and a company’s value creation
  • Green financing and new (green) financial products
  • Realization of ESG investment—investment funds
  • Circular economy and finance
  • New (sustainable) capitalism, sustainable finance, and economic growth
  • Artificial intelligence, sustainable finance, and value
  • Stakeholder value, shareholder value, and a company’s sustainable risk analysis

References

  1. Chen, R. C. Y., Hung, S.-H., & Lee, C.-H. (2017). Does corporate value affect the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and stock returns? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 7 (2), 188–196.
  2. Crespi, F. & Migliavacca, M. (2020). The Determinants of ESG Rating in the Financial Industry: The Same Old Story or a Different Tale? Sustainability, 12(16), 6398.
  3. Del Giudice, A. & Rigamonti, S. (2020). Does Audit Improve the Quality of ESG Scores? Evidence from Corporate Misconduct. Sustainability, 12(14), 5670.
  4. Diez-Cañamero, B., Bishara, T., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., Minguez, R., & Fernández, J. M. (2020). Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Corporate Sustainability Indexes, Rankings and Ratings. Sustainability, 12(5), 2153.
  5. Ellili, N. (2020). Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure, Ownership Structure and Cost of Capital: Evidence from the UAE. Sustainability, 12(18), 7706.
  6. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5 (4), 210–233.
  7. La Torre, M., Mango, F., Cafaro, A., & Leo, S. (2020). Does the ESG Index Affect Stock Return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50. Sustainability, 12(16), 1–12.
  8. Matos, P. V., Barros, V., & Sarmento, J. M. (2020). Does ESG Affect the Stability of Dividend Policies? Sustainability, forthcoming.

Prof. Dr. Victor Barros
Prof. Dr. Joaquim Miranda Sarmento
Prof. Dr. Pedro Verga Matos
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ESG investment
  • performance
  • corporate finance
  • green financing
  • value creation
  • sustainable finance
  • triple bottom

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
The Value Relevance of ESG Practices in Japan and Malaysia: Moderating Roles of CSR Award, and Former CEO as a Board Chair
by Sahar E-Vahdati, Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin and Mohd Shazwan Mohd Ariffin
Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 2728; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15032728 - 02 Feb 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2665
Abstract
This study examines the impact of ESG practices and its three pillars on the stock price, and the moderating role of CSR award, and having an ex-CEO as a chairman on the ESG-value nexus in Japan and Malaysia. Based on a large sample [...] Read more.
This study examines the impact of ESG practices and its three pillars on the stock price, and the moderating role of CSR award, and having an ex-CEO as a chairman on the ESG-value nexus in Japan and Malaysia. Based on a large sample of 538 observations from 2015–2019, we find a positive valuation effect of ESG practices in both countries, which are in line with stakeholder theory. We observe that the value relevance of ESG practice is significantly higher in Malaysia than in Japan. However, the market does not significantly value all three ESG pillars equally in Japan and Malaysia. Our study reveals that the social pillar is more dominant in Japan; whereas, in Malaysia, it is the environmental pillar that strongly influences market value. According to signaling theory, we find CSR award only moderates the market valuation of ESG in Malaysia. Based on positive synergy theory, we further suggest that when an ex-CEO sits as a chairman, it moderates the value relevance of ESG in Japan. Our study has practical implications for stakeholders including investors, policymakers, and managers. Our results suggest investors and regulators in the Indo-Pacific region need to distinguish between the three pillars of ESG practices and their consequences on the market price, before making an investment decision. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Finance and Value Creation)
17 pages, 545 KiB  
Article
Institutional Shareholders and Firm ESG Performance: Evidence from China
by Fang Jia, Yanyin Li, Lihong Cao, Lintong Hu and Beibei Xu
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 14674; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su142214674 - 08 Nov 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3054
Abstract
It is a noteworthy phenomenon that institutional investors care more about the ESG performance of the firms in their portfolios in China. Exploring the role of institutional shareholders in firms’ ESG performance is vital for corporate sustainable growth. Using a sample of publicly [...] Read more.
It is a noteworthy phenomenon that institutional investors care more about the ESG performance of the firms in their portfolios in China. Exploring the role of institutional shareholders in firms’ ESG performance is vital for corporate sustainable growth. Using a sample of publicly listed firms from 2013 to 2020 in China, through the OLS model, order logistic model, and tobit model, we found that firms with higher institutional ownership had better ESG performance, especially in the environmental (E) aspect. The positive effect of institutional investors on ESG performance is more pronounced in SOE firms, and firms in low pollution industries. Furthermore, mechanism tests suggest that institutional shareholders can incentivize firms to engage in ESG by affecting management change and board voting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Finance and Value Creation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 576 KiB  
Article
The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure
by Shiyu Wu, Xinyi Li, Xiaosen Du and Zexin Li
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 14507; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su142114507 - 04 Nov 2022
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 10336
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance and firm value of Chinese manufacturing listed companies. The moderating role of ownership structure on the relationship between ESG performance and firm value is also tested. [...] Read more.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance and firm value of Chinese manufacturing listed companies. The moderating role of ownership structure on the relationship between ESG performance and firm value is also tested. Sino-Securities ESG Rating is adopted in this paper to measure ESG performance and ownership structure is measured in four aspects, which include ownership concentration, equity balances, executive shareholding and institutional investor shareholding. We find that (1) ESG performance is important in improving firm value, (2) executive ownership and institutional ownership positively and significantly affect firm value, while ownership concentration and equity balance have no impact and (3) executive ownership and institutional ownership moderate the link between ESG performance and firm value, whereas the moderating role of ownership concentration and equity balance is not significant. The results of this study contribute to the existing literature on ESG and will aid corporations to enhance firm value through improving ESG performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Finance and Value Creation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 291 KiB  
Article
Going ESG: The Economic Value of Adopting an ESG Policy
by Maya Finger and Mosi Rosenboim
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 13917; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su142113917 - 26 Oct 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3297
Abstract
Does having an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policy have an impact on stakeholders? This research presents a unique model that allows us to measure the economic value of adopting an ESG policy for financial institutions’ stakeholders. Using the results of a questionnaire [...] Read more.
Does having an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policy have an impact on stakeholders? This research presents a unique model that allows us to measure the economic value of adopting an ESG policy for financial institutions’ stakeholders. Using the results of a questionnaire distributed among financial institution employees and customers, we find that, on average, employees are willing to forgo 11% of their salary to work for a company that has adopted and implemented such a policy. In addition, customers are willing to pay 47% more in management fees to do business with financial institutions that have such a policy. To our knowledge, this is the first study that quantifies the benefits for financial institutions stakeholders of adopting an ESG policy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Finance and Value Creation)
18 pages, 1719 KiB  
Article
Sustainable Financing and Financial Risk Management of Financial Institutions—Case Study on Chinese Banks
by Hao Liu and Weilun Huang
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9786; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14159786 - 08 Aug 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4180
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between sustainable financing and financial risk management of Chinese financial institutions, using data from Chinese banks. Financial risk management is a comprehensive measure of operating performance, asset quality and capital adequacy ratio. The structural vector auto-regression model determines [...] Read more.
This study examines the relationship between sustainable financing and financial risk management of Chinese financial institutions, using data from Chinese banks. Financial risk management is a comprehensive measure of operating performance, asset quality and capital adequacy ratio. The structural vector auto-regression model determines the relationship between two variables. The positive shock of sustainable financing business negatively impacts the financial risk management of banks. In contrast, positive shock of banks’ financial risk management positively affects sustainable financing. Further subdivision of the sample revealed that sustainable financing does not always negatively impact the financial risk management of large state-owned banks. However, the positive shock of financial risk management reduces urban banks’ green credit proportions. The results are consistent whenever compared between the empirical outcome of the entire sample and the sample consisting of national joint stock bank accounts. This comparison helps eliminate the possibility of a biased outcome as a major portion of the sample is from a national joint-stock bank account. Apart from data limitations, the results of the sub-sample test are influenced due to the difference in deposit and loan interest rates, as well as different ownership structures of banks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Finance and Value Creation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

41 pages, 1464 KiB  
Article
Circular Economy and Financial Aspects: A Systematic Review of the Literature
by Beatriz de Souza Mello Gonçalves, Flávio Leonel de Carvalho and Paula de Camargo Fiorini
Sustainability 2022, 14(5), 3023; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14053023 - 04 Mar 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 6082
Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyze the pre-existing studies that investigate the link between the circular economy and financial aspects in order to understand the evolution of the circular economy literature and its relationship with finance. In addition, it proposes an [...] Read more.
The objective of this article is to analyze the pre-existing studies that investigate the link between the circular economy and financial aspects in order to understand the evolution of the circular economy literature and its relationship with finance. In addition, it proposes an investigation of empirical evidence of economic-financial gains resulting from the adoption of circular production practices. The methodology used to achieve this goal was a systematic review of the literature and bibliometric analysis. Thus, it was possible to conclude that the barriers faced by companies adopting the circular economy in relation to financial performance are defined by (i) the size of the business and the initial investment cost, (ii) difficulties for micro and small companies, (iii) to a more complex structuring of the business, and (iv) greater exposure to risk, as the circular economy is a new concept and is and not as representative as a linear standard system. The results show that few studies investigate corporate gains from circular production, which is, therefore, an important topic for future research and the major contribution of this paper. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Finance and Value Creation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1765 KiB  
Article
Environment, Social, and Governance Score and Value Added Impacts on Market Capitalization: A Sectoral-Based Approach
by Radu-Alexandru Șerban, Diana Marieta Mihaiu and Mihai Țichindelean
Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 2069; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14042069 - 11 Feb 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3793
Abstract
The main goal of this study was to measure the impact of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainability score and value added to companies’ market capitalization. Therefore, financial and sustainable performance were measured in a sample of 5557 companies divided into 9 [...] Read more.
The main goal of this study was to measure the impact of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainability score and value added to companies’ market capitalization. Therefore, financial and sustainable performance were measured in a sample of 5557 companies divided into 9 economic sectors of activity from 78 countries and 6 regions (Americas: 2144; Asia: 1770; Europe: 1232; Oceania: 311; Africa: 90; United Kingdom: 10). The analyzed sample consisted of publicly traded companies ranked by market capitalization (from small-cap to large-cap), for which the ESG score was measured in the analyzed period: the financial year was 2019, before the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using two methods (multiple linear regression and complementary quantile regression), we found a direct link between the ESG score and value added variables and market capitalization, with distinct impacts at the economic sector level for ESG score and relatively constant impact for value added. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Finance and Value Creation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 419 KiB  
Article
Effect of Computer Assisted Audit Tools on Corporate Sustainability
by António Samagaio and Tiago Andrade Diogo
Sustainability 2022, 14(2), 705; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14020705 - 09 Jan 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4146
Abstract
The literature is fertile in studies that examine the determinants of internal and external auditors’ adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATs), often ignoring their practical effects on audit quality and organizational performance. This study provides novel evidence on the type of [...] Read more.
The literature is fertile in studies that examine the determinants of internal and external auditors’ adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATs), often ignoring their practical effects on audit quality and organizational performance. This study provides novel evidence on the type of CAATs used by internal auditors, tests the effect of their adoption on corporate sustainability, and explores the moderating effect of organizational characteristics. In this paper, we used data from Portuguese internal auditors collected through a survey, whose research hypotheses were analyzed by the partial least squares–structural equation modeling technique. We found that internal auditors use CAATs moderately in the exercise of their tasks. The results of our study show that there is a strong and positive effect of the use of CAATs by internal auditors on fraud detection in the purchase-to-pay business process, and that the intensity of this relationship is not influenced by the type and size of the entity. This study complements previous research and provides support to practitioners’ decisions that can boost the use of CAATs in internal auditing to make organizations more sustainable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Finance and Value Creation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop