sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Next Steps for Governance of Sustainable Mobility Innovations

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Engineering and Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2022) | Viewed by 11814

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Interests: sustainable mobility; transport policy and governance; system dynamics modelling; transport equity; new mobility data and technologies; automobility

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Interests: transport governance; sustainability; decarbonisation; travel behaviour change; smart mobility

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Interests: social and environmental sustinability in mobility; transport politics and governance; mobility justice; active travel

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Mobility and accessibility are undeniably central to an individual’s needs for engaging with goods, services and other individuals, as well as opportunity for employment, education and recreation. Supported by rapidly developing technologies, transport systems and behaviours are undergoing a period of intense change (in addition to the impacts of COVID-19) as social practices are reorganised around new possibilities. This profound change requires a suitable governance framework in order to realise both the sustainable and equitable potential (Docherty et al., 2018). This is reflected in evolving attitudes towards mobility, equity and sustainability, recognition of mobility injustice (Mullen and Marsden, 2016) and improved understanding of individual movement through availability of new and emerging data forms (Harrison et al., 2020).

New mobility services and technologies include the move towards both smart and shared mobility, micro-mobility (eg, bicyles, e-bikes, e-scooters) and, more specifically, when looking towards the future, autonomous automobiles. Central to change has been the rapid development of digital network infrastructures (ie “the internet of things”), which, in addition to facilitating new creation of mobility services, are allowing individuals to access detailed real-time information to help plan journies, choose modes and offer seamless ticketing. Such integrated services are known as “Mobility-as-a-Service”, and are said to have the potential to revolutionise the way that individuals move around during their daily lives, thus having significant impact on transportation networks and their externalities.

Yet, there is a large range of uncertainty about the likelihood of these aspirations being realised. Although there has been much focus on the potential benefits, analysis of and response to the risks has been somewhat lacking (Pangbourne et al., 2020, Docherty et al., 2018). However, these services and technologies are largely led by private companies and “start-ups”, with limited government intervention or regulation to make those services contribute rather than hinder efforts to make transport sustainable and inclusive. Although there are examples of (at least partial) success stories, such as Mo-Bike in Beijing, a lack of collaboration has led to some failures in meeting aspirations of sustainable and equitable mobility and, in fact, could hinder meeting such goals.

The purpose of this Special Issue is to gather original articles that investigate and offer solutions to the governance issues that may arise, or have already arisen from the introduction of new mobility services and technologies. In particular, we are interested in those problems that are not yet fully understood, such as the impact on social inclusion, the role of new forms of data or unanticipated consequences for active travel and health. We seek a broad range of case studies, modelling approaches, policy appraisal and theoretical discussions that not only show the likely uptake pathways and potential roles and risks of new mobility services and technologies in a sustainable and equitable transport system, but also what governance structures, business models and policy approaches may be required to support the transition. Moreover, we are interested in receiving submissions from a wide international perspective, enabling the understanding of how such practices may need to differ between regions and places. The content of this Special Issue will add to the growing discourse on transport governance and mobility justice in respect to “smart”or “future” mobility, focusing on critical solutions to previously overlooked risks.

Docherty, I., Marsden, G. and Anable, J. The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 115, 114–125.

Harrison, G., Grant-Muller, S. M. and Hodgson, F. C. New and emerging data forms in transportation planning and policy: Opportunities and challenges for “Track and Trace” data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 117, 102672.

Mullen, C. and Marsden, G. Mobility justice in low carbon energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 2016, 18, 109–117.

Pangbourne, K., Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D. and Milakis, D. Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 131, 35–49.

Dr. Gillian Harrison
Dr. Kate Pangbourne
Dr. Caroline Mullen
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • mobility
  • transport
  • mobility justice
  • smart mobility
  • transport policy
  • governance
  • collaborative governance
  • mobility-as-a-service
  • mobility services
  • mobility technologies

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

23 pages, 4501 KiB  
Communication
Making Response-Ability: Societal Readiness Assessment for Sustainability Governance
by Monika Büscher, Cronan Cronshaw, Alistair Kirkbride and Nicola Spurling
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5140; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15065140 - 14 Mar 2023
Viewed by 2102
Abstract
Governance for net-zero mobility is complex and risky. In this paper, we discuss conceptual analysis and design research with more than 250 stakeholders in the governance of mobility transformations in the North of England. Two key findings are that governance actors need new [...] Read more.
Governance for net-zero mobility is complex and risky. In this paper, we discuss conceptual analysis and design research with more than 250 stakeholders in the governance of mobility transformations in the North of England. Two key findings are that governance actors need new methods to: (1) realise the value of dissensus, which resonates with debates in social and environmental accounting (SEA); and (2) to develop new skills to address complexity, risk, and social justice, defined as ‘response-abilities’ in feminist science and technology studies (STS). Combining insights from SEA and STS with our own research, we present a ‘Societal Readiness Assessment’ (SoRA) framework, which we have developed to support more inclusive sustainable mobility transformation. We discuss how SoRA might become a standard complement to the Technology Readiness Assessment and conclude by considering challenges and opportunities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next Steps for Governance of Sustainable Mobility Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2446 KiB  
Article
Combining Tradable Credit Schemes with a New Form of Road Pricing: Producing Liveable Cities and Meeting Decarbonisation Goals
by Jo-Ann Pattinson, Gillian Harrison, Caroline Mullen and Simon Shepherd
Sustainability 2022, 14(14), 8413; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14148413 - 08 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1951
Abstract
This paper considers how the implementation of a tradable credit scheme (TCS) may be used to reduce road traffic and to contribute to the formation of liveable cities and global climate change commitments. The concept of applying TCS to individual road transport is [...] Read more.
This paper considers how the implementation of a tradable credit scheme (TCS) may be used to reduce road traffic and to contribute to the formation of liveable cities and global climate change commitments. The concept of applying TCS to individual road transport is familiar to transport researchers as a measure to regulate congestion and reduce transport-related emissions. Yet, it is not a strategy currently being considered by policy makers in the UK, despite the electrification of the road vehicle fleet and the associated loss of tax revenue presenting a rare opportunity to alter the economic instruments, which apply to road traffic. We consider how transport researchers can capitalise on this unique moment in transport history to shape transport policy. Our study uses qualitative methods, including a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with transport stakeholders and experts, in addition to a literature review and document analysis. Data analysis is inductive, permitting the formation of new ideas about the potential benefits of TCS and the barriers to the application of TCS to real-world policy. Building upon the results of TCS experiments and the results of our analysis, we propose a novel potential form of TCS combined with road pricing to maintain government revenue, which incentivises road users to decrease road vehicle kilometres travelled and reduce pollution and congestion. The proposal contributes to the discussion on the governance of road transport and taxation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next Steps for Governance of Sustainable Mobility Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1529 KiB  
Article
Imaginaries of Road Transport Automation in Finnish Governance Culture—A Critical Discourse Analysis
by Janne J. Olin and Miloš N. Mladenović
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1437; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14031437 - 27 Jan 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3652
Abstract
As transport automation technology continues to emerge, there is a need to engage in the questions of its governing—to find a balance between unreflective enablement and rigid control. An increasing body of literature has begun to address the topic, but only a few [...] Read more.
As transport automation technology continues to emerge, there is a need to engage in the questions of its governing—to find a balance between unreflective enablement and rigid control. An increasing body of literature has begun to address the topic, but only a few studies have examined discourse and culture as central components of the related governance processes. This article aims to analyse the discourse surrounding self-driving vehicles in the Finnish context by drawing from the concept of sociotechnical imaginaries. The critical discourse analysis framework is applied to study a comprehensive set of documents published by Finnish national-level governmental bodies from 2013 to 2020. The analysis identifies four imagined ways of implementing self-driving vehicles into the Finnish transport system and a large set of mostly positive anticipated implications. Moreover, the analysis illustrates the transport automation imaginary’s cultural and spatial detachment, most obvious in the lack of detail and the disconnection between the imagined implementations and the anticipated implications. The findings are convergent with findings from other governance contexts, where discourse has been largely characterised by an unjustified optimism and strong determinism related to the wedlock with the automobility regime. If left unaddressed, such lack of reflectivity will not just lead to a plethora of undesired implications for Finnish society at large but will also signify a failure in developing an adaptive governance culture needed to face challenges of the 21st century. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next Steps for Governance of Sustainable Mobility Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

28 pages, 2703 KiB  
Review
Enabling Safe and Sustainable Medical Deliveries by Connected Autonomous Freight Vehicles Operating within Dangerous Goods Regulations
by Andy Oakey, Matt Grote, Paul G. Royall and Tom Cherrett
Sustainability 2022, 14(2), 930; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14020930 - 14 Jan 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2661
Abstract
Health service providers in developed nations are responsible for 5% of their national carbon emissions, much of which originate from transport and supply chains. Connected autonomous freight vehicles (CAV-Fs) offer the potential to reduce this impact and enable lower cost operations, with trials [...] Read more.
Health service providers in developed nations are responsible for 5% of their national carbon emissions, much of which originate from transport and supply chains. Connected autonomous freight vehicles (CAV-Fs) offer the potential to reduce this impact and enable lower cost operations, with trials being explored across the world. Transportation and carriage regulations, particularly in relation to the movement of dangerous goods (DG) such as medicines and diagnostic specimens, have not been developed for and applied to this new transport mode, particularly where loads are unaccompanied. Through an audit of current legislation and practice, this paper evaluates current DGs regulations applied to the transportation of medical products and medicines by autonomous road vehicles. Where existing regulations are not appropriate for CAV-Fs, recommendations and adaptations have been proposed to support safe and practical application. Remote monitoring and tracking of vehicles are critical for ensuring load security, quick and effective incident response, and management of documents and communications between parties. Loading/unloading procedures are significantly more important than in crewed vehicles, with load segregation and recording of all activity being of key importance. Other recommendations relate to training provision, vehicle specifications, and product health monitoring. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next Steps for Governance of Sustainable Mobility Innovations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop