sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Theories and Methods of Positive Organizational Behavior

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2022) | Viewed by 7239

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business,Institute for National Security and Green Development, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
Interests: positive organization theory; safety behavior management; green development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Economics and Management, University of Emergency Management (preparatory), Langfang 065201, China
Interests: positive psychology; occupational safety and health

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business,Institute for National Security and Green Development, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
Interests: positive psychology; psychological and behavioral decision of green consumption

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The theoretical foundation of positive organizational behavior is derived from the findings of positive psychology. Positive organizational behavior is a new field of study that has only emerged in the 21st century in the discipline of organizational behavior. It was formally introduced by Luthans in 2002 and emphasizes the development and management of human psychological strengths. There are six categories traditionally studied in positive organizational behavior, referred to as CHOSER, namely the six areas of confidence, self-efficacy, hope, optimism, submissive wellbeing, emotional intelligence, and resiliency.

Unlike traditional organizational behavior, which focuses its field of study on addressing dysfunction, conflict, and work stress among managers and employees, in this Special Issue, positive organizational behavior focuses its research on how to take a positive approach in a more macro view and how to leverage member strengths to improve organizational or social development.

First, in order to clarify the goals and directions of the practice and system design of positive organizational behavior, the historical evolution and evolutionary trends of positive organizational behavior theory need to be deeply analyzed. It is necessary to systematically analyze the components of positive organizational behavior and the causal mechanisms among them from the perspectives of concept, subject, object, content, process, and method, analyze the international frontier status and contemporary value of positive organizational behavior theory, and accurately grasp the characteristics and evolution of positive organizational behavior theory and practice innovation in different contexts.

Second, it is a consensus among scholars that culture has an important influence on human psychology and behavior, and it is increasingly important to study positive organizational behavior under the influence of cultural differences from the perspective of cultural influence. This requires research from the perspectives of cultural background, cultural differences, and cultural characteristics to further enrich the static and dynamic studies of positive organizational behavior under the influence of cultural differences.

Third, since ancient times, health, safety, and peace have been prerequisites for human survival and development and have also become the conceptual consensus for building a community of shared destiny for humankind. COVID-19 is a common challenge requiring the collaboration of the international community to tackle it. In the context of the impact of COVID-19, organizations and society will also experience major changes. The first change is the change of members’ mentality. People go through emotional stages such as tension, panic, and sadness, and this psychological state is different from the past, so it will certainly be mapped to human resources management as well. Another change is the transition from process-based organizations to data-based organizations. In the post-pandemic era, the combination of reality and reality will be a mainstream state of organizations, and human economic activities will grind to a halt if the response to the pandemic is not supported by digital technology. Therefore, in the context of building a community with a shared future for humankind and the post-pandemic era, identifying how to innovate and develop positive organizational behavior is an important topic.

Finally, in order to achieve the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality, governments around the world must implement carbon emission reduction targets and enforce them onto enterprises, which will definitely affect the production operation and management mode of enterprises. Meanwhile, energy saving and carbon-neutral behavior of individuals is also an emerging research direction. The significance of research on positive organizational behavior in the context of carbon peak and carbon neutrality includes exploring how members of an organization or society can generate a high level of green, trust, hope, optimism, resilience, intelligence, humility, and positivity, as well as how to generate an environmentally friendly collective power as a lasting resource so as to promote a low-carbon sustainable development of enterprises and society and form a lasting competitive advantage.

Based on the above perceptions, this Special Issue aims to incorporate positive organizational behavior into a broader research perspective and provide new insights into the design and enhancement of positive organizational behavior theories and methods in the future based on cultural background differences, carbon peaking, and carbon neutrality, forging a community of shared future for humankind, and the post-pandemic era context.

We welcome topics addressing, but not limited to:

  • The historical evolution of positive organizational behavior research;
  • Theories and methods of positive organizational behavior based on cultural contextual differences;
  • Positive organizational behavior in the context of carbon peak and carbon neutrality;
  • Positive organizational behavior in forging a community of shared future for humankind;
  • Positive organizational behavior in the post-pandemic era.

Prof. Dr. Hong Chen
Prof. Dr. Hui Qi
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Qianwen Li
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • positive organizational behavior
  • theories and methods
  • cultural background differences
  • carbon peak and carbon neutralization
  • community of human destiny
  • post-pandemic era

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 627 KiB  
Article
Why Can’t I Work in a Green Way? Research on the Influencing Mechanism of Employees’ Labor Intentions
by Bei Liu, Hong Chen, Shiyan Jiang and Qingqing Sun
Sustainability 2021, 13(20), 11528; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132011528 - 19 Oct 2021
Viewed by 1305
Abstract
Non-green labor patterns have a negative impact on health and organizational sustainable development. This research proposes a green labor style that takes the sustainable development of employees themselves as the premise, with the protection of their physical and mental health as a long-term [...] Read more.
Non-green labor patterns have a negative impact on health and organizational sustainable development. This research proposes a green labor style that takes the sustainable development of employees themselves as the premise, with the protection of their physical and mental health as a long-term goal, that is not only concerned with how to build a reasonable mechanism to guarantee the physical and mental health of employees, but also with the labor protection mechanism of the whole process, from production to output. On the basis of social cognitive theory and the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, this study recruited a sample of 884 Chinese employees to explore the mechanism of their willingness to conduct green labor, including factors such as institutional constraints, boundary management, and organization-based self-esteem (OBSE). The results show that high levels of institutional constraints curbed employee demand for green labor and, in employees, good boundary-management skills acted as a mechanism of resistance against negative constraints. Furthermore, individual OBSE, as a positive psychological resource, could buffer the negative impacts of the organizational scenarios on outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Theories and Methods of Positive Organizational Behavior)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1692 KiB  
Article
Do Career Demands and Career Choices Always Coincide? A Matching Perspective Based on Career Anchors and Job Characteristics
by Hong Chen, Yujie Wang and Yunqiao Ding
Sustainability 2021, 13(20), 11273; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132011273 - 13 Oct 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2661
Abstract
Career choice is an important behavior for people wanting to develop their social life and is a key link to doing so. The matching of career choice with an individual’s real work demands will have a significant impact on the development of individuals, [...] Read more.
Career choice is an important behavior for people wanting to develop their social life and is a key link to doing so. The matching of career choice with an individual’s real work demands will have a significant impact on the development of individuals, organizations, and society. However, at this stage, there are few studies on this matching situation. From the perspective of the matching of career anchors and job characteristics, this study explored the distribution and different characteristics of employees’ career demands and their career choices through a survey of 407 employees, and further discussed the matching status of these. The results of the study are as follows: (1) Individual career demands (career anchors) presented three attributes: single, multiple, and unclear. Among the single career anchor types, life anchors had the largest proportion, while among multiple career anchor individuals, individuals with both challenge anchors and service anchors accounted for the majority. (2) Individual career demands (career anchors) were significantly different across most demographic variables and organizational/work variables. (3) Deviations between employees’ career demands and their career choices seemed to be a common phenomenon, with the highest degree of fit (62.79%) with the entrepreneurial creativity anchor and the lowest degree of fit (21.28%) with the lifestyle anchor. In addition, in an analysis of three job fit characteristics, the entrepreneurial creativity anchor had a significant preference for managerial characteristics, whereas the challenge anchor had a significant preference for technological characteristics. The degrees of fit of the other anchors were characterized by the frequency of ‘right suboptimal fit’ being larger than that of ‘left suboptimal fit’. In other words, a specific career anchor had a significant preference for job characteristics matched by the right career anchor, with the midpoint of the career anchor octagon model defining the angle of observation. This study provides a reference for human resource management departments and for employees’ recognition and planning of career anchors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Theories and Methods of Positive Organizational Behavior)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 10562 KiB  
Review
International Research Progress and Evolution Trend of Interpersonal Trust—Prospects under COVID-19 Pandemic
by Bin Ji and Ruyin Long
Sustainability 2022, 14(2), 987; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14020987 - 17 Jan 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2665
Abstract
Retrospecting articles on interpersonal trust is of great importance for understanding its current status and future development in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially, with the widespread use of Big Data and Blockchain. In total, 1532 articles related to interpersonal trust were [...] Read more.
Retrospecting articles on interpersonal trust is of great importance for understanding its current status and future development in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially, with the widespread use of Big Data and Blockchain. In total, 1532 articles related to interpersonal trust were collected as research database to draw keyword co-occurrence mapping and timeline mapping by VOSviewer and CiteSpace. On this basis, the research content and evolution trend of interpersonal trust were systematically analyzed. The results show that: (1) Data cleaning by code was first integrated with Knowledge Mapping and then used to review the research of interpersonal trust; (2) Developed countries have contributed the most to the research of interpersonal trust; (3) Social capital, knowledge sharing, job and organizational performance, Chinese Guanxi are the research hotspots of interpersonal trust; (4) The research hotspots on interpersonal trust evolve from the level of individual psychology and behavior to the level of social stability and development and then to the level of organization operation and management; (5) At present, the research on interpersonal trust is in the outbreak period; fMRI technology and Big Data and Blockchain technology gradually become vital research tools of interpersonal trust, which provides significant prospects for the following research of interpersonal trust under the COVID-19 pandemic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Theories and Methods of Positive Organizational Behavior)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop