sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 January 2022) | Viewed by 37530

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-Ro, Suwon 16419, Korea
Interests: management of technology; innovation sustainability; business analytics and optimization

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-Ro, Suwon 16419, Korea
Interests: corporate foresight; technology strategy; portfolio management; mobility and energy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Ewha School of Business, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-Gil, Seoul 03760, Korea
Interests: management information systems

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Recent corporate business administration and technology innovation face tough challenges triggered by unexpected global issues such as Brexit, the trade tensions between the United States and China, and the Covid-19 pandemic. Hence, many companies have started to consider the new-normal business guidelines focusing on environment and sustainability, named of ESG or TBL. ESG (environment, sustainability, and governance) has surfaced as a new business principle with an expanded perspective beyond the traditional CSR (corporate social responsibility). The triple bottom line (TBL), a coined term by John Elkington in 1998, consists of three parts—social, environmental, and financial—and has also received considerable interest from academia and practice. ESG and TBL believe that companies should focus on social and environmental concerns, in the same way as they do economic performance. It is also essential to investigate the roles of innovations in business development and sustainable competitiveness and growth.

However, as Pezzey (1989) noted, there are more than 60 definitions of sustainability. This number would likely have increased since then. The term sustainability is stimulating debates, not only regarding its definition, but also when addressing it in the business context. There are notions that innovation could play a pivotal role in promoting sustainability, but some argue that innovation's role cannot be over-emphasized. In this context, we believe that it is essential to bring together different perspectives on sustainability and innovation in academia and practice. Given solid evidence, we can take a step toward building a desirable relationship between innovation, sustainability, and business performance.

This Special Issue on “Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies” is aimed at filling significant theoretical or practical gaps in the literature by answering the following questions:

  • How global uncertain events are changing and will change corporate management, corporate social responsibility, and innovation practices?
  • How can TBL (or ESG) be defined and designed as the new normal framework for innovation after unexpectable global factors such as Covid-19?
  • How can innovation efforts be revised and refined as a result of TBL (or ESG)?
  • What are the new issues and factors in planning and implementing TBL (or ESG) compared with the traditional sustainable business framework (such as corporate social responsibility (CSR))?
  • Do we need the global standard or international cooperation to effectuate TBL (or ESG) regarding innovation efforts?
  • How do we know whether such sustainability efforts have substantially improved business performances?
  • What are public institutions' roles (e.g., universitiesa and government) in supporting and balancing TBL (or ESG) initiatives in the innovation sector?
  • How can innovative technologies be combined and assimilated with TBL (or ESG)?
  • How can entrepreneurship explore and exploit resources for successful and sustainable venture startups?
  • Is it possible to achieve a higher performance by adopting a new sustainable business model (BM) over traditional BMs?
  • How can we anticipate the future of sustainability and innovation?
  • How can companies manage climate change while improving financial performance?

There are many related articles already published in the journal of Sustainability, such as the recent papers; “Influencing Factors on Knowledge Management for Organizational Sustainability” (Mila Kavalić et al., 2021), “A Review of Eco-Innovations and Exports Interrelationship, with Special Reference to International Agrifood Supply Chains” (Galera-Quiles et al., 2021), "The Impact of R&D Intensity on the Innovation Performance of Artificial Intelligence Enterprises-Based on the Moderating Effect of Patent Portfolio" (Yuanyuan Dong et al., 2021), "How Does Corporate Sustainability Increase Financial Performance for Small- and Medium-Sized Fashion Companies: Roles of Organizational Values and Business Model Innovation" (Yang and Jang, 2020), "Coopetition for Sustainable Competitiveness: R&D Collaboration in Perspective of Productivity" (Ko et al., 2020), "Outsourcing Strategies of Established Firms and Sustainable Competitiveness: Medical Device Firms" (Paek et al., 2019), “The Nonlinear Relation between Institutional Ownership and Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance in Emerging Countries” (Martinez-Ferrero and Lozano, 2021), “Stakeholder Value Creation: Comparing ESG and Value Added in European Companies” (Signori, San-Jose, Retolaza, and Rusconi, 2021), and “Environmental, Social, Governance Activities and Firm Performance: Evidence from China” (Ruan and Liu, 2021).

Prof. Dr. Heesang Lee
Prof. Dr. Juneseuk Shin
Prof. Dr. Heedong Yang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable innovation
  • innovation for ESG (or TBL)
  • performance for ESG (or TBL)
  • corporate performance for ESG (or TBL)
  • new business models for ESG (or TBL)
  • sustainable innovation in emerging economies
  • sustainable innovation in developed countries
  • sustainable innovation in the hitech industry
  • future of sustainability and innovation
  • corporate climate change and disaster management
  • managing sustainability culture

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

15 pages, 757 KiB  
Article
Symbiotic Relationships in Business Ecosystem: A Systematic Literature Review
by Changhee Yoon, Seungyeon Moon and Heesang Lee
Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 2252; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14042252 - 16 Feb 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 6698
Abstract
The business ecosystem shares many unique features with the biological ecosystem due to its origins. Similar to the biological ecosystem, the business ecosystem also emphasizes symbiotic relationships among symbionts (i.e., participants of a business ecosystem). In this study, we have broadened and deepened [...] Read more.
The business ecosystem shares many unique features with the biological ecosystem due to its origins. Similar to the biological ecosystem, the business ecosystem also emphasizes symbiotic relationships among symbionts (i.e., participants of a business ecosystem). In this study, we have broadened and deepened our knowledge of symbiosis in a business ecosystem, focusing on how each relationship develops and evolves through the interaction between keystone species and symbionts. We have introduced the typology of symbiotic relationships and highlighted the significant role of keystone species in business ecosystems. We defined three symbiosis types based on the analysis results: mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism. The findings indicated that each relationship continuously transitions into different symbiotic relationships as the relationship between the participants changes. The results also showed that a keystone species, a leader of a business ecosystem, can contribute to the success of a business ecosystem by strategically managing their relationship with symbionts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 5321 KiB  
Article
Exploring Innovation Ecosystem of Incumbents in the Face of Technological Discontinuities: Automobile Firms
by Joohyun Kim, Byungjoo Paek and Heesang Lee
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1606; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14031606 - 29 Jan 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 6964
Abstract
In recent years, the innovation ecosystem concept has received much attention in the strategy and innovation fields to address radical or discontinuous innovation. This study aims to explore the innovation ecosystem construct of incumbents in the face of technological discontinuities, focusing on the [...] Read more.
In recent years, the innovation ecosystem concept has received much attention in the strategy and innovation fields to address radical or discontinuous innovation. This study aims to explore the innovation ecosystem construct of incumbents in the face of technological discontinuities, focusing on the ecosystem actors (that is, incumbents, component providers, and complementors) and their activities for sustainable value creation. First, we conducted a literature review of 34 highly cited and relevant research documents discussing the innovation ecosystem concept to extract key phrases for the innovation ecosystem’s research framework. Then, through the lens of dynamic capabilities, the five core capabilities of incumbent focal firms—collaboration and networking, opportunity sensing, entrepreneurial orientation, knowledge management, and strategic flexibility—are derived as key elements of the research framework. In addition, the following case study conducted by the content analysis of two leading automobile incumbents, Volkswagen and Toyota, supports and concretizes the established research framework. We conclude that as the value chain in the industry is open to diverse emerging experts holding critical technologies in the era of discontinuous innovation, the ecosystem actors are extensively linked beyond existing industry boundaries. Next, incumbents’ proposed five core capabilities are essential for their successful navigation of the complex innovation ecosystem. Finally, the case study also indicates that the traditional automobile giants in the existing ecosystem are heading toward sustainable value creation via technology internalization and dominant platform building to transform themselves into leaders of a new innovation ecosystem in the era of Connected, Autonomous, Shared and Services, and Electric (C.A.S.E.) innovation in the automobile industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 296 KiB  
Article
Earnings Management, Board Composition and Earnings Persistence in Emerging Market
by Nguyen Vinh Khuong, Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman, Pham Quoc Thuan, Nguyen Thanh Liem, Le Huu Tuan Anh, Cao Thi Mien Thuy and Huynh Thi Ngoc Ly
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1061; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14031061 - 18 Jan 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3506
Abstract
Income data are useful for making economic decisions and anticipating future revenues. Earning quality, or the utility of earnings in making decisions, is determined by real economic performance. Firms with greater performance should, on average, have higher profits quality. Managers, investors, and scholars [...] Read more.
Income data are useful for making economic decisions and anticipating future revenues. Earning quality, or the utility of earnings in making decisions, is determined by real economic performance. Firms with greater performance should, on average, have higher profits quality. Managers, investors, and scholars are interested in the influence of earnings management (EM) on earnings persistence (EP). This study evaluates the relationship between these variables in terms of accrual, real EM, board composition, and EP. We conducted quantitative research using GMM regression on a sample of 228 listed businesses in the Vietnamese stock market from 2014 to 2017. Our findings indicate that accrual earnings management (AEM) is associated with a negative connection with EP, but real earnings management (REM) is associated with a mixed association with EP. Additionally, the data indicate that board of directors (BODs) play a critical role in EP. Our research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by establishing a foundation for future research in this subject and by proposing some feasible options for functional government agencies and enterprise management interested in enhancing EP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
22 pages, 4916 KiB  
Article
From Coopetition to Hyper-Coopetition: Focusing on a New Paradigm of Heterogeneous Organizational Relationship in the High-Tech Industry
by Seungyeon Moon, Changhee Yoon and Changhyun Park
Sustainability 2022, 14(1), 440; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14010440 - 31 Dec 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2323
Abstract
In this study, we proposed the concept of hyper-coopetition based on an investigation of the inter-organizational relationships of chipmakers. Hyper-coopetition is distinguished from traditional coopetition by having companies in heterogeneous industries as participants, whereas traditional coopetition is a relationship between competitors in the [...] Read more.
In this study, we proposed the concept of hyper-coopetition based on an investigation of the inter-organizational relationships of chipmakers. Hyper-coopetition is distinguished from traditional coopetition by having companies in heterogeneous industries as participants, whereas traditional coopetition is a relationship between competitors in the same industry. To investigate antecedents and processes of hyper-coopetition, we established the conceptual framework of hyper-coopetition through a literature review. We conducted a case study on leading chipmakers, including Intel, Samsung, and Nvidia, to investigate antecedents and processes of the chipmakers’ hyper-coopetition. By examining hyper-coopetition, we contributed to the relevant academic field by introducing hyper-coopetition, its typology, and a new research agenda. The analysis result also brought managerial implications for companies in a rapidly changing environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 785 KiB  
Article
Does Business Group Matter for the Relationship between Green Innovation and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
by Qiang Xu, Lian Xu, Zaiyang Xie and Mufan Jin
Sustainability 2021, 13(23), 13204; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132313204 - 29 Nov 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1870
Abstract
Green innovation has been an important approach for firms to achieve sustainable development in recent years; however, empirical studies on the relationship between green innovation and corporate performance have delivered mixed results. In particular, business groups (BG), which are a critical organizational form [...] Read more.
Green innovation has been an important approach for firms to achieve sustainable development in recent years; however, empirical studies on the relationship between green innovation and corporate performance have delivered mixed results. In particular, business groups (BG), which are a critical organizational form in many economies and are proven to have unique advantages for conducting green innovation, have attracted less scholarly attention. Therefore, in this study, we adopt the perspective of a business group and investigate how green innovation by BG-affiliated firms affects their financial performance, and we also explore the moderating effect of BG’s internal supply chain partnership. Based on a sample of 202 listed manufacturing enterprises in China from 2013 and 2017, the research results show that green innovation significantly improves the financial performance of firms, and this positive effect is more prominent in BG-affiliated firms than in non-BG firms. Further research found that BG-affiliated firms’ supply chain (suppliers and customers) concentration and trust positively moderate the relationship between green innovation and financial performance. This research concerns the particularity of business groups’ green innovation practices in China, which not only contributes to the research on the effect of BG’s green innovation on corporate performance in an emerging market context but also deepens our understanding of the role of its internal supply chain partnership from the perspective of concentration and trust. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 316 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Earnings Management and Board Characteristics on Company Efficiency
by Hsueh-Li Huang, Lien-Wen Liang, Hai-Yen Chang and Hsiu-Yuan Hsu
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11617; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132111617 - 21 Oct 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2729
Abstract
Earnings management is a means by which managers manipulate earnings to conceal the true performance of a company. The characteristics of the board of directors can also influence firm performance. This study applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Tobin regression model to [...] Read more.
Earnings management is a means by which managers manipulate earnings to conceal the true performance of a company. The characteristics of the board of directors can also influence firm performance. This study applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Tobin regression model to investigate the influence of earnings management and board characteristics on company efficiency. The data sample includes 396 Taiwanese electronics and biotechnology companies from 2009 to 2017. The results indicate that earnings management has an insignificant influence on company efficiency with mixed results on the interactions between earnings management and board characteristics. When companies practiced earnings management, director experiences, a higher proportion of female directors, and a higher number of board meetings increased company efficiency. In contrast, a higher number of independent directors and a higher attendance rate of the directors at the board meeting decreased company efficiency. The results of this study suggest that board diversity, more female directors, and meetings could still improve firm performance despite companies’ engagement in earnings management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
17 pages, 980 KiB  
Article
Does Uncertainty Moderate the Relationship between Strategic Flexibility and Companies’ Performance? Evidence from Small and Medium Pharmaceutical Companies in Iran
by Allam Yousuf, Vahid Zeynvand Lorestani, Judit Oláh and János Felföldi
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 9157; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13169157 - 16 Aug 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2118
Abstract
The business environment has become complicated—full of risk and uncertainty over and above companies’ control— therefore companies must find mechanisms to enhance their performance in the light of this instability. The Iranian market is one of the best examples of unstable markets because [...] Read more.
The business environment has become complicated—full of risk and uncertainty over and above companies’ control— therefore companies must find mechanisms to enhance their performance in the light of this instability. The Iranian market is one of the best examples of unstable markets because of its political and economic circumstances; despite this, the pharmaceutical industry in Iran is considered one of the best industries, which is still working efficiently. The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of strategic flexibility on the performance of Iranian SME pharmaceutical companies, by considering the effect of environmental uncertainty as a moderator. The study is a cross-sectional one. Primary data was collected from 113 companies by using an adopted questionnaire. The questionnaires were forwarded to managers at these companies, a purposive (selective) sampling technique was used to collect the data, and the total number of responses that were valid for statistical analysis was 228. The response rate was 67.25%. The results showed that strategic flexibility positively affects companies’ performance. Supply and demand uncertainty moderate the relationship between strategic flexibility and companies’ performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 722 KiB  
Article
Technology-Independent Directors and Innovative Knowledge Assets: A Contingency Perspective
by Yexin Liu, Weiwei Wu and Ruixiang Han
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 9106; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13169106 - 14 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1556
Abstract
In the current dynamic and competitive environment, the sustainable competitive advantage of firms has flowed to the development of innovative knowledge assets. Drawing on resource dependence theory, this paper develops a contingency research model to explore how technology-independent directors affect innovative knowledge assets. [...] Read more.
In the current dynamic and competitive environment, the sustainable competitive advantage of firms has flowed to the development of innovative knowledge assets. Drawing on resource dependence theory, this paper develops a contingency research model to explore how technology-independent directors affect innovative knowledge assets. A sample of Chinese manufacturing firms listed on Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges between 2010 and 2019 was used for the regression analysis. By employing the fixed effect model, the results show that technology-independent directors have a significant positive impact on innovative knowledge assets. Furthermore, the impact of technology-independent directors on innovative knowledge assets is strengthened in the firms that are state-owned, larger, and older. These results provide important insights related to innovation research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2780 KiB  
Article
An Exploratory Study of How Latecomers Transform Strategic Path in Catch-Up Cycle
by Xiaoli Li and Hongqi Wang
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 4929; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13094929 - 28 Apr 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3148
Abstract
In catch-up cycles, the industrial leadership of an incumbent is replaced by a latecomer. Latecomers from emerging economies compress time and skip amplitude by breaking the original strategic path and form a new appropriate strategic path to catch up with the incumbents. Previous [...] Read more.
In catch-up cycles, the industrial leadership of an incumbent is replaced by a latecomer. Latecomers from emerging economies compress time and skip amplitude by breaking the original strategic path and form a new appropriate strategic path to catch up with the incumbents. Previous studies have found that the original strategic path is difficult to break and difficult to transform. This paper proposes a firm-level framework and identifies the impetus and trigger factors for latecomers to transform the strategic path. The impetus is the mismatch between strategic mode and technological innovation capability. The trigger is the progressive industrial policy. Based on a Chinese rail transit equipment supplier’s (China Railway Rolling Stock Corporation; CRRC) catch-up process, this paper finds that the strategic path transformation is an evolutionary process from mismatch to rematch between strategic mode and technological innovation capability. With the implementation of industrial policy, the technological innovation capability will change. The original strategic mode does not match with changed technological innovation capability, which leads to performance pressure. With the adjustment of industrial policy, a new strategic mode adapted to new technological innovation capability emerges. This paper clarifies the source that determines successful catch-up practices for latecomers and contributes to latecomers’ sustainable growth in emerging economies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

33 pages, 3379 KiB  
Review
The Approach of Value Innovation towards Superior Performance, Competitive Advantage, and Sustainable Growth: A Systematic Literature Review
by Mohammed A. Hajar, Ammar Ahmed Alkahtani, Daing Nasir Ibrahim, Mohd Ridzuan Darun, Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi and Sieh Kiong Tiong
Sustainability 2021, 13(18), 10131; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su131810131 - 10 Sep 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4072
Abstract
The value innovation strategy of pursuing differentiation and low cost has diverged and correlated with various notions and perspectives, which adds complexity and ambiguity to the current knowledge of value innovation. Thus, this study uses a systematic literature review methodology to identify key [...] Read more.
The value innovation strategy of pursuing differentiation and low cost has diverged and correlated with various notions and perspectives, which adds complexity and ambiguity to the current knowledge of value innovation. Thus, this study uses a systematic literature review methodology to identify key scientific contributions to the field of value innovation by providing a structured reliable overview of the current knowledge. This study aims to integrate the findings of previous research on value innovation to identify where conclusions converge and diverge and highlight emerging trends and gaps in the literature. This study seeks to answer the research question, “How can value innovation be an approach for superior performance, competitive advantage, or sustainable growth?” In this context, results are achieved through analyzing and synthesizing 73 empirical articles on value innovation literature published from 1997 to January 2021. Particularly, this study contributes to the extant literature by providing an integrative framework that summarizes the literature findings and addressing thematic classifications of the value innovation process. This study also helps further improve research on value innovation by identifying gaps and suggesting a conceptual model to mitigate those gaps. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Business Performance and Sustainable Innovation Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop