sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Quantitative Assessment of Decentralized Sanitation Systems in Small and Remote Communities and Developing Regions

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 November 2021) | Viewed by 4613

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
Interests: wastewater treatment; biological nutrient removal (bnr); onsite wastewater treatment systems (owts); water recovery; sustainable waste(water) management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
Interests: environmental engineering; remediation of contaminated sites; energy and environmental impacts; water and wastewater systems engineering; microbial physiology and ecology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
Interests: sustainable and resilient infrastructure; environmental infrastructure (water and wastewater); environment and climate change; climate change adaptation; sustainable water management; engineering education; sustainable community development; indigenous community-based research

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue in the journal of Sustainability is dedicated to quantitative assessment of decentralized sanitation systems serving small and remote communities and developing regions, to support the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal #6 “Clean Water and Sanitation”, one of the 17 goals of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable development that requires urgent attention and action through a global partnership between all developed and developing countries. In 2017, the health and living conditions of 4.2 billion people suffered from a lack of safely managed sanitation 1.

In small and remote communities and developing regions, decentralized wastewater treatment systems including onsite and cluster sanitation systems are commonly used and preferred over centralized wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) due to financial restrictions and resource limitations 2. Some examples include (but are not limited to) traditional septic systems; innovative and alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems (I/A OWTS) such as nitrogen removing biofilters (NRBs), sand filters, aerobic treatment units, wetlands, and peat-based systems; and waste stabilization ponds (WSPs). Conventional septic systems are suspected as sources of nutrients, pathogen, and emerging contaminants of concern (EC) and are linked to health issues in communities where drinking water is supplied from onsite water resources 3–6.

However, the current literature lacks sufficient information to fully support these implications and provide a framework for the suitability of designs and legislative regulations and enforcement 3. In addition, the current guidelines are developed through data-based approaches leading to rule-of-thumb designs and thus have resulted in heterogeneous and inconsistent application on a global scale. The use of data- or model-based approaches can provide a grounding for a globally consistent application of research and regulation on decentralized sanitation systems, which can ultimately support evidence-based designs that are focused on site-specific conditions of each service region. Moreover, in deterministic design procedures, the safety factor has been used to account for the associated uncertainty. More stringent environmental regulations warrant integration of a more in-depth uncertainty analysis, as a part of risk assessment, to identify sources accurately 7

As such, the aim and scope of this Special Issue has been defined as follows:

  • Case studies of “traditional technology optimization” or “new technology development and validation” using appropriate sample population and real-time data;
  • Analysis and case studies of technology development in small, remote, and Indigenous communities, including northern and cold climates;
  • Fate and transport of EC in traditional and innovative decentralized sanitation systems;
  • Characterization of wastewater sources in small and remote communities using big data, with a specific focus on determining EC and wastewater strength of “green” households where conservative water use strategies are practiced;
  • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from decentralized sanitation systems;
  • Cost analysis and life cycle assessment (including social life cycle assessment) of traditional and innovative decentralized sanitation systems using innovative quantitative assessment techniques (e.g., data mining and machine learning).

Other innovative research in the general area of quantitative assessment of decentralized sanitation systems may also be considered.

Dr. Roya Pishgar
Prof. Dr. Angus Chu
Dr. Kerry Black
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • big data
  • decentralized sanitation systems
  • developing countries
  • emerging contaminants of concern (EC)
  • innovative/alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems (I/A OWTS)
  • life cycle assessment
  • sanitation
  • small and remote communities

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 11145 KiB  
Article
Non-Sewered Sanitation Systems’ Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Balancing Sustainable Development Goal Tradeoffs to End Open Defecation
by Kelsey Shaw, Christopher Kennedy and Caetano C. Dorea
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11884; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132111884 - 27 Oct 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4196
Abstract
Discharge of excreta into the environment and the use of decentralized sanitation technologies, such as septic tanks, pit latrines and ecological sanitation variants (i.e., container-based sanitation), contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but have remained poorly quantified. The purpose of this analysis was [...] Read more.
Discharge of excreta into the environment and the use of decentralized sanitation technologies, such as septic tanks, pit latrines and ecological sanitation variants (i.e., container-based sanitation), contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but have remained poorly quantified. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the impacts that meeting Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.2 (i.e., ending open defecation by 2030) would have on SDG 13 (i.e., combatting climate impacts). The current Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change GHG estimation methodology was used as the basis for calculations in this analysis, augmented with improved emission factors from collected data sets for all types of on-site sanitation infrastructure. Specifically, this assessment focused on the three different service levels of sanitation (i.e., improved, unimproved and no service) as defined by UNICEF and WHO as they pertain to three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. This analysis considered the 100-year global warming potential values in carbon dioxide equivalents of methane and nitrous oxide that can be emitted for each scenario and decentralized sanitation technology. Ultimately, six scenarios were developed for various combinations of pathways and sanitation technologies. There was significant variability between the scenarios, with results ranging from 68 Tg CO2eq/year to 7 TgCO2eq/year. The main contributors of GHG emissions in each scenario were demonstrated to be septic tank systems and pit latrines, although in scenarios that utilized improved emission factors (EFs) these emissions were significantly reduced compared with those using only standard IPCC EFs. This analysis demonstrated that using improved EFs reduced estimated GHG emissions within each SSP scenario by 53% on average. The results indicate that achieving SDG sanitation targets will ultimately increase GHG emissions from the current state but with a relatively small impact on total anthropogenic emissions. There is a need for the continued improvement and collection of field-based emission estimations to refine coarse scale emissions models as well as a better characterization of relevant biodegradation mechanisms in popular forms of on-site sanitation systems. An increase in the understanding of sanitation and climate change linkages among stakeholders will ultimately lead to a better inclusion of sanitation, and other basic human rights, in climate action goals. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop