sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Informing Resource Policy with Sustainability Science in Times of Transition

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Resources and Sustainable Utilization".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 July 2021) | Viewed by 12509

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Chief Guest Editor
Leiden University, Rapenburg 70, 2311 EZ Leiden, Netherlands
Interests: critical materials; resilient supply chains; sustainable cities

E-Mail Website
Assistant Guest Editor
Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya (IDC Herzliya), HaUniversita 8 8, Herzliya 4610101, Israel
Interests: sustainability and environment; environmental economics and natural resources; climate change; quantitative models; environment; economic growth and development; environmental policy; sustainability; urban sustainability; area and environment

E-Mail Website
Assistant Guest Editor
Hot or Cool, Manteuffelstrasse 47, 12103 Berlin, Germany
Interests: sustainable lifestyles; consumer scapegoatism and power dynamics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainability sciences have proven crucial in supporting policy makers to make informed decisions. However, with regards to formulating scientifically supported resources policies that are equitable and sustainable, much work remains to be done to support the magnitude and urgency of transformation needed to match the sustainability challenge. This Special Issue aims to address this gap.

There is increasing awareness of the material requirements of the transition towards a sustainable socio-economic system, and the problematic dependency on long and fragile supply chains for these materials. This has been highlighted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, during which many countries were confronted with problems in obtaining medical supplies. Besides the security of supply, the environmental and social impacts of drastically increasing the production of certain materials should be considered, as should the need for rapid reductions in demand for other resources. Achieving this radical transition to sustainability would require us to address three tensions between sustainability sciences and resource policies:

  • The scientific analysis of resource trends is often on a global scale, while the implementation of sustainability policies is more often on a local level;
  • Translating urgent yet often/relatively abstract or conceptual results of scientific analysis to practical on-the-ground policies;
  • Power dynamics between actors/institutions addressing the issues and drivers of damaging material consumption trends.

This Special Issue calls for papers that explore the intersection of environmental sciences and resource policy. We invite authors from all fields of science that fall under the broader umbrella of the environmental sciences, including, but not limited to, industrial ecology, ecological economics, and political economy.

We invite authors to submit literature reviews, policy analysis, and original research. We particularly welcome work that addresses the link between policy and sustainability science directly. We welcome both reviews of literature, and science-informed policy. Scientific studies are expected to discuss their policy relevance, implementation, and challenges directly. Methods can include both quantitative approaches (e.g., I/O, MFA, LCA, system dynamics, and agent-based modelling) and qualitative approaches (e.g., case studies or conceptual work addressing emerging policy fields such as circular economy). Policy studies are expected to reflect scientific advancements.

Dr. Benjamin Sprecher
Chief Guest Editor

Dr. Tomer Fishman
Dr. Lewis Akenji
Assistant Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Radical sustainability transition
  • Sustainable development
  • Resource policy
  • Energy policy
  • Circular economy policy
  • Environmental sciences
  • Public engagement
  • Science - policy interface
  • Energy transitions
  • Metabolic transitions
  • Critical materials
  • System dynamics
  • Political economy
  • Political ecology
  • Power dynamics
  • Institutional changes
  • Supply disruptions
  • Resource constraints

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 8694 KiB  
Article
Phosphorus Governance within Planetary Boundaries: The Potential of Strategic Local Resource Planning in The Hague and Delfland, The Netherlands
by Lisa Harseim, Benjamin Sprecher and Cathrin Zengerling
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10801; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su131910801 - 28 Sep 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 7690
Abstract
In recent years, a growing body of research has explored the urban dimension of the critical resource phosphorus with a focus on urban metabolism analysis, recovery technologies and governance frameworks. However, there has been no tangible and holistic attempt at choosing between available [...] Read more.
In recent years, a growing body of research has explored the urban dimension of the critical resource phosphorus with a focus on urban metabolism analysis, recovery technologies and governance frameworks. However, there has been no tangible and holistic attempt at choosing between available measures and instruments for their implementation in the urban realm. With the growing and increasingly urban world population, cities have become more and more important as actors in phosphorus governance by fueling global phosphorus flows, e.g., via the consumption of food, agricultural products, and phosphorus recycling. Globally, a future-proof phosphorus metabolism may be contributed to by strategic local phosphorus planning. This article systematically explores the purposive potential of local phosphorus planning using a case study of The Hague, The Netherlands. Looking across multiple administrative and spatial dimensions, the study combines quantitative analysis of phosphorus flows with qualitative investigation of their drivers, the actors involved, current regulations and local scope for action. The research reveals the feasibility of meaningfully impacting phosphorus flows through urban action. The potential for strategic local resource planning is demonstrated in a grid of policy options and in the assessment of their socio-economic and environmental benefits. Additionally, the study draws up a list of key recommendations to transfer to other urban settings. It encourages further research aimed at closing data gaps for local phosphorus inventories, collaborative approaches in strategic resource planning, scope for action in other cities or jurisdictions, as well as improved quantification of the outreach of policy effects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1879 KiB  
Article
Matching Demolition and Construction Material Flows, an Urban Mining Case Study
by Teun Johannes Verhagen, Marijn Louise Sauer, Ester van der Voet and Benjamin Sprecher
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 653; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13020653 - 12 Jan 2021
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 3832
Abstract
The recycling of demolition waste is essential to lower the construction sectors primary material demand, responsible for 50% of the global primary material consumption. Almost all demolition waste is used as filler material for the construction of roads, preventing further reuse or recycling [...] Read more.
The recycling of demolition waste is essential to lower the construction sectors primary material demand, responsible for 50% of the global primary material consumption. Almost all demolition waste is used as filler material for the construction of roads, preventing further reuse or recycling after this application. The built environment generates considerable annual material in-and outflows. However, there has been little discussion on the availability and further application of this potential supply of secondary materials as a replacement for primary materials. In this study, we quantify the percentage of demolition waste that can be repurposed as secondary materials in the Dutch construction sector. We analyzed the yearly building material flows for the municipality of Leiden using municipal data on demolition and construction to explore the viability of the Dutch government’s policy goal to reduce primary materials consumption by 50% before 2030. From this analysis, we find that the recycling of demolition waste has a sizable potential but just falls short of the stated policy goal. Even in a situation with more construction than demolition, there will remain a considerable mismatch in the yearly construction material demand and available supply of demolition waste for our municipal-wide case study. More importantly, the current processing of demolition waste in the Netherlands will require significant improvements to achieve this goal. New governmental policies are required to focus on maintaining material quality and allowing further use of recycled materials as buildings materials. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop