sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advancing Sustainability through Well-Being

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 July 2021) | Viewed by 11479

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Sustainability, College of Global Futures, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, AZ, USA
Interests: sustainable and regenerative development; happiness and well-being; spiritual and intuitive development; community development; neighborhood revitalization; permacult

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Sustainability, College of Global Futures, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, AZ, USA
Interests: regenerative and sustainable food systems; indigenous ecological knowledge; biomimicry; alternative food; agroecology; community building; informal education; systems thinking; desert ecosystems

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We live in a world where sustainability (and its many constituents/surrogates) is being called for on numerous stages. From the recent social unrest in the United States, borne of racial injustice, to the outcomes and implications of a global pandemic, our collective well-being is being challenged on every level. A shift in the way we relate to the planet is needed. We propose that science can be used as a tool not to control our future, but to recognize, catalyze, and support natural processes unfolding in front of us each day for an improved quality of life for all beings.

Theologian Matthew Fox says we can relate to the Earth in three ways: exploit it, recreate on it, or be in awe of it. We suggest that, from a space of awe and intentional inquiry, we can reconnect with and develop wisdom that simultaneously enhances our sustainability and well-being. Thus, for this Special Issue, “Advancing Sustainability through Well-Being”, we are seeking new considerations of the inextricable links between sustainability and well-being.

We seek to collate a diverse collection of academic works linking (m)any of the multiple dimensions of well-being (physical, mental, emotional, subjective, social, spiritual, sexual, environmental, non-human, multi-dimensional, etc.) and sustainability (in its many definitions and considerations). We specifically ask for papers that realize our current state, acknowledge past wisdom and mistakes/gifts that have supported the present, and strive for a future where all beings are honored. 

We welcome original research papers that may be grounded in empirical work, but also those that engage with alternative theories and frameworks. Examples might include autoethnographies, using mixed media or arts-based methods, such as audio-visual or storytelling, or papers with feminist, anti-colonial, and anti-racist tones. Non-typical works and authors are also welcomed, including those in racial and social justice platforms, the arts, spirituality, indigenous and traditional ecological knowledge, approaches to regeneration, death, grief, sexuality, and more. Our call is one that opens up space for all ways of knowing, so that we may forge a regenerative relationship with the planet we call home.

The papers should address some of, but not be limited to, the following questions:

  • How can sustainability be enhanced through well-being (generally, and specific to your construct(s))? What are various examples from diverse groups and communities?
  • Are there systems that are sustainable without ensuring people’s well-being? How are issues of social justice and equity reconciled?
  • Which forms of well-being (physical, mental, emotional, social, spiritual, sexual, environmental, non-human, multi-dimensional, etc.) enhance sustainability and in which ways? Are there forms of well-being that may go beyond sustainability and promote a regenerative system?
  • How are past forms of wisdom informing the intersection between well-being and sustainability? In what ways are traditional methods of knowing ignored or reframed within new frameworks, without acknowledgment?
  • What are examples of positive connections between well-being and sustainability? Are there case studies to demonstrate these links?
  • What aspects of well-being have been ignored within but are fundamental to sustainability?
  • Which aspects of sustainability and well-being go hand in hand? What can we do well to more closely integrate these aspects? What frameworks are needed? Which equitable and justice issues need to be addressed?
  • Some examples might include: farming communities during COVID-19, clean energy projects, eco-village or communal living, communities coming together to address a common cause, social innovations, and more.

Dr. Scott Cloutier
Dr. Sara El-Sayed
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • well-being
  • sustainability
  • regeneration
  • social justice/equity

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 928 KiB  
Article
Gardening for Food Well-Being in the COVID-19 Era
by Esteve G. Giraud, Sara El-Sayed and Adenike Opejin
Sustainability 2021, 13(17), 9687; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13179687 - 28 Aug 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5112
Abstract
“Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness”, is what millions of Americans strive for. The onset of COVID-19 has highlighted the disparities that exist among Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) communities, which are facing food access inequities. In this paper, we argue [...] Read more.
“Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness”, is what millions of Americans strive for. The onset of COVID-19 has highlighted the disparities that exist among Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) communities, which are facing food access inequities. In this paper, we argue that engaging in growing food sustainably can improve food access, support food justice and enhance sense of purpose and well-being. We expand the notion of Food Well-Being (FWB) to include food producers—especially gardeners—and hypothesize that gardening has the potential to enhance FWB, regardless of the racial and socio-economic background. However, without policies tackling social and racial justice issues, structural barriers may hinder this potential. We use three studies to draw a rich profile of sustainable food gardeners in Arizona, USA and their well-being: (a) the children and teachers engaged in school gardens in the Phoenix metropolitan area; (b) sustainable gardeners and farmers in Phoenix and Tucson; (c) Arizona gardeners during the pandemic. The results show a connection between sustainable gardening and eudemonic well-being, and an impact on the five FWB dimensions (physical, intellectual, spiritual, emotional and social). However, without appropriate policies, funding and infrastructure, the impact might remain minimal, volatile and subject to tokenism. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancing Sustainability through Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 414 KiB  
Article
Cultivating Spiritual Well-Being for Sustainability: A Pilot Study
by Erica Berejnoi, David Messer and Scott Cloutier
Sustainability 2020, 12(24), 10342; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su122410342 - 10 Dec 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2738
Abstract
Sustainability science has focused predominantly on external/technological solutions to environmental degradation while giving insufficient attention to the role of spiritual well-being for holistic sustainability. While it is important for students to learn about solutions in a time where environmental problems have been identified [...] Read more.
Sustainability science has focused predominantly on external/technological solutions to environmental degradation while giving insufficient attention to the role of spiritual well-being for holistic sustainability. While it is important for students to learn about solutions in a time where environmental problems have been identified as prevalent, that alone is not enough. We propose that sustainability may start as a deep individual internal process manifested as a change of values stemming from enhanced spiritual well-being. The current study examined whether a novel sustainability classroom curriculum, including contemplative practices (CPs), increased traits indicative of spiritual development and well-being and happiness, which are theorized to increase sustainable behavior (SB). Students attended a 15-week university course promoting SB through CPs in a space intended to be safe and supportive. Participants were compared to unenrolled peers and completed pre- and post-intervention quantitative measures of (1) happiness, (2) self-compassion, and (3) SB, and qualitative questions investigating spiritual development and well-being. Multivariate and univariate follow-up analyses indicated that course participation increased student self-compassion and happiness, while SB was unaffected. Qualitative reports indicated that CPs led students to develop spiritual traits, a systems’ thinking mentality and an awareness of their interconnectedness. Students, also, assigned greater importance to spiritual well-being as a prerequisite for SB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancing Sustainability through Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2028 KiB  
Article
Informing the Sustainable Pursuit of Happiness
by Scott Cloutier, Michael Angilletta, Jean-Denis Mathias and Nuri C. Onat
Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9491; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12229491 - 15 Nov 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3056
Abstract
Although most people want to be happy, the pursuit of happiness involves an overwhelming number of choices and great uncertainty about the consequences. Many of these choices have significant implications for sustainability, which are rarely considered. Here, we present an optimality model that [...] Read more.
Although most people want to be happy, the pursuit of happiness involves an overwhelming number of choices and great uncertainty about the consequences. Many of these choices have significant implications for sustainability, which are rarely considered. Here, we present an optimality model that maximizes subjective happiness, which can eventually account for sustainability outcomes. Our model identifies the optimal use of time or energy to maximize happiness. Such models tell people how to invest in domains of happiness (e.g., work vs. leisure) and how to choose activities within domains (e.g., playing a computer game vs. playing a board game). We illustrate this optimization approach with data from an online survey, in which people (n = 87) either recalled or imagined their happiness during common activities. People reported decelerating happiness over time, but the rate of deceleration differed among activities. On average, people imagined spending more time on each activity than would be needed to maximize happiness, suggesting that an optimality model has value for guiding decisions. We then discuss how such models can address sustainability challenges associated with overinvesting (e.g., excessive CO2 emissions). To optimize happiness and explore its implications for sustainability over long periods, models can incorporate psychological processes that alter the potential for happiness and demographic processes that make lifespan uncertain. In cases where less objective approaches have failed, a quantitative theory may improve opportunities for happiness, while meeting sustainability outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancing Sustainability through Well-Being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop