sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability and Degrowth—Theoretical Challenges and Empirical Evidence

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2022) | Viewed by 7856

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Aarhus Universitet, Fuglesangs Allé 4, 8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
Interests: international business; international management; internationalization strategies; international marketing; entry market strategies; emerging markets; organization theory

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Our aim for this Special Issue is to contribute to the discussions concerning the ways in which organizations and society may disengage from the uncritical adherence and strong dependency on putative economic growth. All over the world, organizations are based on the  ‘growth’ paradigm (Latouche, 2009; Daly, 2013; Hickel & Kallis,2020) which is largely accepted to be independent of the level of national economic development and, as a result, the growth paradigm is not contested in most organizational and management research (Heikkurinen et al., 2013; Shrivastava, 2015). It circumvents the public arenas where different possibilities of socioecological orders are discussed. Not surprisingly, the consequences of this blind pursuit of growth have been ecological, and economic crises have also become the everyday condition of our lives. Yet, inhabitants of big cities face daily problems with pollution, violence, and psychological stress. At the same time, organizational and management scholars have been accused of not paying due attention to the questions which really matter in society. We invite scholars to present papers discussing news ways of organizing and solving contemporary societal problems.

We invite papers that critically address the role of organizations and institutions in maintaining the status quo of economic growth. We invite papers dealing with new experiments and new forms of organizing which address societal problems linked to Sustainability and Degrowth in the Global South. For instance, there is a growing literature dealing with degrowth economics which has emerged as a critic of the assumption in the economic thought and policy making that economic growth is a must, an absolute condition for the survival of the global political economic system (Latouche, 2009; Kallis et al., 2018). It has become a mantra that is neither questioned by mainstream economists (Daly, 2013) nor by sociologists, management, or organization scholars (Heikkurinen et al., 2013).

News ways of structuring our economy will have implications for the whole organization of our society: health, work, leisure, parental leave, distribution of wealth, sustainability, corporate governance, food production, competition, etc. Do degrowth organizations present significant differences when compared to growth-seeking organizations? Take, for instance, work—how is work organized in alternative organizations? Do alternative organizations maintain the rigid division between manual and mental work? Other possible topics include, but are not limited to the following questions:

  • Sustainability and degrowth also imply enormous theoretical challenges regarding why organizations exist and how they should be governed. Therefore, it is likely that our theoretical resources need a strong update, and in order to pursue this, theoretical discussions are fundamental. For instance, are there institutional environments which are more likely to facilitate the transition towards degrowth? Are there governance principles which may function as barriers to degrowth?
  • Few organizations and communities are already preparing and participating in the creation of new alternatives to sustainable degrowth. We would like to invite papers analyzing possible alternatives.
  • Recent problems in the economy, environmental catastrophes, and the COVID-19 pandemic indicate that their most challenging scenarios are becoming evident—how are organizations preparing for the end of growth times?
  • How do incumbents resist or collaborate with sustainable and degrowth strategies?
  • How can we reframe our dependency on growth? What are the organizational challenges for becoming a degrowth organization?
  • Degrowth concept in business schools—is there any possibility to teach degrowth in a BS?
  • Are organizations in emerging societies dealing with the possibility of degrowth? What are the institutional changes which need to take place for bringing degrowth out of a peripheral position?
  • Do we need to face severe natural disasters before we start seriously rethinking our ways of organizing?
  • Are there emerging alternative ways of organizing economic life? How do we characterize these organizations?

References

  1. Daly, H. (2013). A further critique of growth economics. Ecological economics88(0): 20-24.
  2. Heikkurinen, P., & Bonnedahl, K. J. (2013). Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: a review and conceptual comparison of market-and stakeholder-oriented strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production 43:191-198.
  3. Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy25(4): 469-486.
  4. Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources43:291-316.
  5. Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to growth. Polity.
  6. Shrivastava, P. (2015). Organizational sustainability under degrowth. Management Research Review, 38(6).

Dr. Robson Silva Rocha
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainability
  • global south
  • degrowth
  • climate change
  • ecological food production
  • circular economy
  • green growth
  • alternative economies
  • postcapitalism
  • postgrowth
  • energy transition
  • transformation
  • sustainable development
  • ecological economics
  • green decoupling

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 296 KiB  
Article
Degrowth in Practice: Developing an Ecological Habitus within Permaculture Entrepreneurship
by Robson Silva Sø Rocha
Sustainability 2022, 14(14), 8938; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14148938 - 21 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2299
Abstract
The literature on degrowth has suffered from only engaging with normative ideas. More recently the degrowth debate has started moving from a normative perspective to close the wide gap that has existed between normative ideas and is analysing how to link ideas to [...] Read more.
The literature on degrowth has suffered from only engaging with normative ideas. More recently the degrowth debate has started moving from a normative perspective to close the wide gap that has existed between normative ideas and is analysing how to link ideas to the institutional and cultural environment that shapes practices. To address this challenge, we draw on the work of Pierre Bourdieu in order to examine transformations in the habitus and forms of capital of those who decide to move into sustainable entrepreneurship through permaculture in Brazil. Permaculture represents a vibrant alternative to industrial food production and addresses fundamental contemporary social problems, such as increasing inequalities, climate change and the loss of biodiversity. The article explores the challenges faced and respective responses of those who decide to change their relationships with nature and society by becoming permaculture entrepreneurs (PEs). The paper shows that, when entering the permaculture universe, individuals start critically examining their values and ways of living, which leads to a disengagement from dominant patterns of behaviour and social expectations in order to pursue sustainable lifestyles and thereby develop an ecological habitus. Full article
20 pages, 791 KiB  
Article
Figuring the Transition from Circular Economy to Circular Society in Australia
by Gavin Melles
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10601; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su131910601 - 24 Sep 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3957
Abstract
The combined pressure of economic, environmental, and social crises, including bushfires, waste management, and COVID created conditions for a turn to the circular economy in Australia. In addition to a dominant circular discourse of ecological modernization in state and federal policy and business [...] Read more.
The combined pressure of economic, environmental, and social crises, including bushfires, waste management, and COVID created conditions for a turn to the circular economy in Australia. In addition to a dominant circular discourse of ecological modernization in state and federal policy and business and public consultations, other more socially inclusive and ecologically sensitive discourses are circulating. The two main competing discourses are a techcentric circular economy and a reformist circular society, the latter reflected in ‘growth agnostic’ doughnut economics. In the context of unambitious federal and state policies, the circular transition is being supported by a range of intermediary organizations whose key representatives envision or ‘figure’ the sustainability transition in hybrid discursive combinations. Few studies of the circular economy transition in Australia exist and none focus on competing discourses and intermediation for sustainability transition. Since intermediary organizations both discursively reflect and lead the circular change, fuller understanding of how circularity is interpreted or ‘figured’ by key actors is crucial. This study identifies how twenty representatives from intermediating organizations actively ‘figure’ the process of the circular transition for Australia, including while managing the tension between personal positions and organizational missions. Employing the concept of figured worlds this qualitative thematic discourse interview study analyses how, drawing on available circular discourses, key actors and their organisations actively ‘figure’ the present and future circular transition. The study contributes to debates on circular discourses, nature, and the limitations of the circular economy in Australia, the relational space of intermediation, and the nature of MLP transitions for a sustainable circular transition economy in Australia. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop