sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Innovation and Risk Governance for Emerging Technologies

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (26 March 2023) | Viewed by 5294

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca' Foscari Venice, Calle Larga S. Marta 2137, 30123 Venice, Italy
2. Greendecision Srl. Via delle industrie 21/8, 30175 Venice, Italy
Interests: risk assessment; risk management; chemicals; nanotechnology; sustainability; circular economy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Greendecision Srl. Via delle industrie 21/8, 30175 Venice, Italy
Interests: risk assessment; chemicals; nanotechnology; sustainability assessment of products and technologies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Key enabling technologies (KETs) such as advanced materials and nano and biotechnologies have emerged across a broad range of industries and applications. The KETs have appeared so fast on the market that it has become a real challenge to accommodate them correctly and uniformly across all involved regulatory domains (e.g., chemicals, electronics, cosmetics, biocides, consumer products, medicine). This has resulted in a major hurdle to appropriately govern the potential societal and environmental risks of these technologies without compromising the economic benefits that they can deliver. To promote sustainable innovation, an inclusive, credible, and science-based process for risk governance is required for the current and future generations of KETs. This process should rely on sound scientific knowledge regarding the properties and the biological/ecological interactions of the novel materials, as well as on tailored regulatory guidance and standard guidelines to ensure their safety. A more resilient and adaptive form of risk governance is required that should promote clear and transparent communication of risks and uncertainties, and requires proactive participation of key stakeholders (industry, SMEs, regulation, academia, civil society). In this Special Issue, we seek to engage with scholars and stakeholders from these communities and invite manuscript submissions on theoretical and empirical research on a range of themes related to safety and sustainability of KETs, including, but not limited to the following:

  • Risk assessment
  • Safe and sustainable by design
  • Risk management
  • Risk governance
  • Life cycle assessment

Dr. Danail Hristozov
Dr. Lisa Pizzol
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • key enabling technologies
  • risk governance
  • innovation
  • risk assessment
  • risk management
  • sustainability assessment

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 1719 KiB  
Article
Socio-Economic Life Cycle-Based Framework for Safe and Sustainable Design of Engineered Nanomaterials and Nano-Enabled Products
by Stella Stoycheva, Alex Zabeo, Lisa Pizzol and Danail Hristozov
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5734; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14095734 - 09 May 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2576
Abstract
This manuscript describes an innovative approach to socio-economic assessment of (advanced) engineered nanomaterials and nano-enabled products (NEPs) to support safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) decision making by industries in the early stages of product development. This semi-quantitative methodology is based on a sound conceptual framework grounded [...] Read more.
This manuscript describes an innovative approach to socio-economic assessment of (advanced) engineered nanomaterials and nano-enabled products (NEPs) to support safe-and-sustainable-by-design (SSbD) decision making by industries in the early stages of product development. This semi-quantitative methodology is based on a sound conceptual framework grounded in the combination of social life cycle analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis methods and supports decision making based upon socio-economic impacts assessed over the full life cycle of a product. To facilitate its application by industries, the methodology was implemented as an Excel-based self-assessment tool. This easy-to-use, cost- and time-efficient tool can guide users through their SSbD decision making regarding newly developed nanomaterials and NEPs and can also be applied to re-evaluate existing materials and NEPs in order to improve their sustainability from a socio-economic perspective. The relatively low requirements of this tool regarding the level of efforts and expert knowledge needed for its application make it a good starting point for initial assessment to highlight socio-economic issues in the value chain. The results of this initial screening can be further used for more detailed analysis in the later stages of product development by performing a full social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Innovation and Risk Governance for Emerging Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1665 KiB  
Article
Testing the Applicability of the Safe-by-Design Concept: A Theoretical Case Study Using Polymer Nanoclay Composites for Coffee Capsules
by Anna Pavlicek, Florian Part, Sabine Gressler, Gloria Rose, André Gazsó, Eva-Kathrin Ehmoser and Marion Huber-Humer
Sustainability 2021, 13(24), 13951; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su132413951 - 17 Dec 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1818
Abstract
The production and use of engineered nanomaterials and nano-enabled products is increasing, enabling innovations in many application areas, e.g., in the sector of food contact materials. However, nanosafety-relevant information for chemical risk assessment is still scarce, leading to a high level of uncertainty [...] Read more.
The production and use of engineered nanomaterials and nano-enabled products is increasing, enabling innovations in many application areas, e.g., in the sector of food contact materials. However, nanosafety-relevant information for chemical risk assessment is still scarce, leading to a high level of uncertainty and making the early integration of safety to the innovation process indispensable. This study analyzed the strengths, weaknesses, and applicability of the nano-specific Safe-by-Design (SbD) concept using nanoclay-containing polymer coffee capsules as a theoretical case study. In addition, a material flow analysis was conducted to identify exposure pathways and potential risks, and a multi-stakeholder approach was applied to discursively discuss challenges when attempting to combine safety and innovation at an early stage. The results indicate that the SbD concept is generally welcomed by all stakeholders, but there is a lack of clear rules on the transfer of information between the actors involved. Furthermore, a voluntary, practical application usually requires in-depth knowledge of nanotechnology and often additional financial efforts. Therefore, incentives need to be created, as there is currently no obvious added value from a company’s point of view. The SbD concept should be further developed, standardized, and integrated into existing legal frameworks to be implemented effectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Innovation and Risk Governance for Emerging Technologies)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop