sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Urban Landscape Design for Well-being

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2019) | Viewed by 10273

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Interests: urban green space; landscape design and planning; urban landscape management; social sustainability; place-keeping
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, The ArtsTower, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Interests: urban policy; place-shaping; place attachment; community and neighbourhood development; inclusion; institutional change; environmental sustainability; knowledge transfer

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

While a growing body of knowledge demonstrates the multiple and positive benefits of urban green spaces for health and well-being, this can often be overlooked when designing, planning and managing our urban landscapes, to a point when poor practice can actually worsen well-being. 

The design, provision, care, use and benefits of natural landscapes in urban settings remain under-researched in academia and under-resourced in practice. In particular, the emerging knowledge of the benefits of natural urban spaces for well-being (Tzoulas et al, 2007; Douglas et al, 2017) contrasts with asset management approaches that view public green spaces as liabilities.

In this Special Issue, we aim to continue the debate explored at the 2018 RGS conference where we convened two sessions aimed at understanding and amplifying the worth of urban nature. We want to provide a platform for scholarship that not only highlights the contested care of natural urban spaces, but engages theoretically and empirically with the well-being benefits provided by a wide range of natural environments in urban settings. We call on researchers whose work seeks to discover how such benefits can be analysed, valued and intensified, to engage with different understandings and experiences of well-being and connect the material, locational and psychological aspects of landscape, nature and mental health.

Translating the ‘many worths of nature’ (Blok, 2013) into intelligent and intelligible landscape design, urban planning, and decision-making that demonstrably maximises human well-being remains fraught. In exploring processes of translation and interpretation, we also recognise the importance of the wider context, which can provide both spurs and barriers to action. We therefore also invite papers that examine the influence of political, social, cultural, ecological and/ or economic dimensions of landscape design on well-being outcomes. We welcome empirical explorations of neo-liberalism, austerity, community participation and national/ local policy instruments as they affect the social use and personal experience of urban natural spaces.

Dr. Nicola Dempsey
Dr. Julian Dobson
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Landscape design
  • Landscape management
  • Mental health and well-being
  • Physical health and well-being
  • Healthy places
  • Urban governance and decision-making
  • Knowledge transfer and policy translation

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 1205 KiB  
Article
Working out What Works: The Role of Tacit Knowledge Where Urban Greenspace Research, Policy and Practice Intersect
by Julian Dobson and Nicola Dempsey
Sustainability 2019, 11(18), 5029; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su11185029 - 14 Sep 2019
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5315
Abstract
Policymakers and practitioners working in urban greenspace management want to know what kind of interventions are effective in promoting mental wellbeing. In practice, however, they rely on multiple forms of knowledge, often in unwritten form. This paper considers how such knowledge is interpreted [...] Read more.
Policymakers and practitioners working in urban greenspace management want to know what kind of interventions are effective in promoting mental wellbeing. In practice, however, they rely on multiple forms of knowledge, often in unwritten form. This paper considers how such knowledge is interpreted and used by a range of stakeholders to identify greenspace interventions to support residents’ health and wellbeing in one UK city. It examines the interface between academic research, policy and practice, drawing on the findings of a three-year study in Sheffield, UK. The Improving Wellbeing through the Urban Nature project investigated the links between ‘urban nature’ and mental health. One strand of the research sought to influence policy and practice, and this article presents findings and reflects on some of the processes of this exercise. It highlights the role of tacit knowledge in practice and its influence on practitioners’ choice of greenspace interventions and the challenges in drawing on such knowledge to influence policy. The findings affirm practice-based knowledge as socially situated, interpretively fashioned and politically weighted. This paper concludes by demonstrating the importance of considering the local context when devising policy prescriptions for greenspace provision and management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Urban Landscape Design for Well-being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 12312 KiB  
Article
Place-Keeping for Health? Charting the Challenges for Urban Park Management in Practice
by Jinvo Nam and Nicola Dempsey
Sustainability 2019, 11(16), 4383; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su11164383 - 13 Aug 2019
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4432
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence that demonstrates the health and well-being benefits of urban green spaces. There is less evidence on the effect of the management of such spaces on our health and well-being. This paper attempts to address this gap [...] Read more.
There is a growing body of evidence that demonstrates the health and well-being benefits of urban green spaces. There is less evidence on the effect of the management of such spaces on our health and well-being. This paper attempts to address this gap in knowledge by calling on empirical evidence collected in the United Kingdom (UK) city of Sheffield. Interviews conducted with professionals and community groups involved in the management of six district parks are analysed using the place-keeping analytical framework. The results highlight the overriding importance of local and national policy regarding how they inform the availability of funding, which is increasingly dependent on partnerships, and governance arrangements to contribute to a park’s maintenance, which is monitored through evaluation. The findings show how policies without funding can jeopardise the effective management of parks and how the concept of making park management a statutory service might have more traction if we consider its contribution to people’s health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Urban Landscape Design for Well-being)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop