Neutrino Physics of the 21st Century and Future

A special issue of Universe (ISSN 2218-1997). This special issue belongs to the section "High Energy Nuclear and Particle Physics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 July 2022) | Viewed by 3082

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
Interests: hedgehogs; topological defects; multiple point principle
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Theoretical Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1053 Budapest, Hungary
Interests: physics beyond the Standard Model; neutrino physics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Interests: neutrino physics and astrophysics; physics beyond the standard model

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Neutrinos are as mysterious as they are ubiquitous, and they are one of the most abundant particles in the universe. Physicists have spent a lot of time exploring the properties of these invisible particles.

Neutrinos are neutral particles produced abundantly during the Big Bang, by the Sun, and by cosmic rays striking the Earth’s atmosphere. However, they are extremely hard to detect, because they have very little mass with no electric charge and only weak interactions with other fundamental particles. After photons, the second most abundant known particle in the universe is the neutrino. 

Despite being the most successful theory of particle physics to date, the Standard Model is not perfect. The Standard Model of particle physics agrees very well with the research, but many important questions remain unanswered. There are fundamental physical phenomena in nature that the Standard Model (SM) does not adequately explain, a few experimental results are not explained by the SM, and certain theoretical predictions are not observed as predicted by the SM—the most puzzling one being neutrino mass. According to the Standard Model, neutrinos are massless particles. However, neutrino oscillation experiments have shown that neutrinos do have mass. The mass terms for neutrinos can be added to the Standard Model by hand, but this leads to new theoretical problems. For example, the mass terms need to be extraordinarily small and it is not clear if the neutrino masses arise in the same way that the masses of other fundamental particles do in the Standard Model. 

The 2015 Nobel Prize in Physics was shared by Arthur B. McDonald, the leader of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO), and Takaaki Kajita, a leader of the Super-Kamiokande collaboration, “for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that neutrinos have mass”. In a single stroke, it both solved a long-standing puzzle about these most elusive of fundamental particles and exposed an incompleteness in the current bedrock theory of physics called the Standard Model.

The discovery of neutrino oscillations in the atmospheric Super-Kamiokande experiment in the SNO, in other solar neutrino experiments, and in the long-baseline reactor KamLAND experiment is one of the most important recent discoveries in particle physics. The phenomenon of neutrino oscillations was further investigated in the long-baseline accelerator K2K, MINOS, and T2K experiments, in the reactor experiments Daya Bay, RENO, and Double Chooz, in the solar BOREXINO experiment, and in many other experiments. 

Neutrinos are standard-model members, but the theoretical predictions are wrong. The prevailing theory says that neutrinos are massless; the Nobel-Prize-winning experiments at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory and Super-Kamiokande demonstrated definitively that neutrinos oscillate between three flavors (electron, muon, and tau) and thus have mass. Until now, neutrinos have been deemed the “only palpable evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model”. Everything we learn about neutrinos in the coming years is new physics. Now the physics community is gearing up for new neutrino studies that could lead to answers to some big questions: 

How much do neutrinos weigh and do they have the magnetic moment?

Are neutrinos their own antiparticles?

Are there more than three kinds of neutrinos?

Do neutrinos get their mass the same way that other elementary particles do?

Why is there more matter than antimatter in the universe?

Prof. Dr. Chitta Ranjan Das
Dr. Timo J. Kärkkäinen
Dr. Sampsa Vihonen
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Universe is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • atmospheric neutrino
  • solar neutrino
  • reactor neutrino
  • accelerator neutrino
  • cosmic neutrino
  • supernova neutrino
  • relic neutrino
  • neutrino astronomy
  • neutrino mass
  • neutrino oscillation
  • neutrino magnetic moment
  • neutrino mixing matrix
  • neutrino mixing angle
  • neutrino CP violation
  • neutrino nuclear interactions
  • neutrinoless double beta decay
  • neutrino detectors
  • neutrino experiments

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

40 pages, 5022 KiB  
Review
A Review of the Tension between the T2K and NOνA Appearance Data and Hints to New Physics
by Ushak Rahaman, Soebur Razzaque and Sankagiri Uma Sankar
Universe 2022, 8(2), 109; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/universe8020109 - 09 Feb 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2308
Abstract
In this article, we review the status of the tension between the long-baseline accelerator neutrino experiments T2K and NOνA. The tension arises mostly due to the mismatch in the apappearance data of the two experiments. We explain how this tension arises [...] Read more.
In this article, we review the status of the tension between the long-baseline accelerator neutrino experiments T2K and NOνA. The tension arises mostly due to the mismatch in the apappearance data of the two experiments. We explain how this tension arises based on νμνe and ν¯μν¯e oscillation probabilities. We define the reference point of vacuum oscillation, maximal θ23 and δCP and compute the νe/ν¯e appearance events for each experiment. We then study the effects of deviating the unknown parameters from the reference point and the compatibility of any given set of values of unknown parameters with the data from T2K and NOνA. T2K observes a large excess in the νe appearance event sample compared to the expected νe events at the reference point, whereas NOνA observes a moderate excess. The large excess in T2K dictates that δCP be anchored at −90° and that θ23 > π/4 with a preference for normal hierarchy. The moderate excess at NOνA leads to two degenerate solutions: (a) NH, 0 < δCP < 180°, and θ23 > π/4; (b) IH, 180° < δCP < 0, and θ23 > π/4. This is the main cause of tension between the two experiments. We review the status of three beyond standard model (BSM) physics scenarios, (a) non-unitary mixing, (b) Lorentz invariance violation, and (c) non-standard neutrino interactions, to resolve the tension. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neutrino Physics of the 21st Century and Future)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop