Next Article in Journal
Determination of Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Hydrochloride Using a Lactone-Rhodamine B-Based Fluorescence Optode
Previous Article in Journal
Meroterpene-Like α-Glucosidase Inhibitors Based on Biomimetic Reactions Starting from β-Caryophyllene
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Bis-Glyoxylamide Peptidomimetics Derived from Bis-N-acetylisatins Linked at C5 by a Methylene or Oxygen Bridge
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Generation of Indole-2,3-quinodimethanes from the Deamination of 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles

by
Alison Rinderspacher
and
Gordon W. Gribble
*
Department of Chemistry, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 10 December 2019 / Revised: 2 January 2020 / Accepted: 8 January 2020 / Published: 9 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Indole Derivatives: Synthesis and Application)

Abstract

:
A novel generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes via the deamination of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[s3,4-b]indoles is reported.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As an offshoot of the venerable o-quinodimethanes [1,2,3,4,5], indole-2,3-quinodimethanes have risen to a position of importance in indole chemistry and they have a fascinating history of exploration and synthetic applications [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
In continuation of our synthesis and chemistry of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles [16,17,18,19,20,21,22], we now report the first generation of an indole-2,3-quinodimethane (1) species from the pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (2) ring system (Figure 1). Given the availability of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles and, in particular, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles (i.e., 2), this possible pathway to the indole-2,3-quinodimethane ring system appeared to be novel and attractive.
Moreover, the early work of Lemal and McGregor on the generation of dienes via the stereospecific deamination of 3-pyrrolines with Angeli’s salt (Scheme 1) proffered the feasibility of our concept [23,24].
We initially focused on the generation of 2,3-diethylidene-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indoline 3 from 2,3-diethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (8) (Scheme 2). However, our first synthesis of 8 from 2-iodoaniline via a Larock indolization [25] with 3-hexyne, followed by indole N-phenylsulfonylation proceeded poorly (not shown). Therefore, we adopted the successful route shown in Scheme 2. Indole (4) was converted to 1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (5) in standard fashion [26]. Treatment of 5 with sec-BuLi (or LDA) and quenching with iodoethane gave 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (6) in 63% yield. Exposure of 6 to acetic anhydride and AlCl3 in dichloromethane afforded 3-acetyl-2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (7) in 65% yield [27]. The structure of 7 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Interestingly, the reverse sequence of initial C-3 acetylation/reduction followed by C-2 lithiation to give 7 failed, probably due to steric hindrance imparted by the C-3 ethyl group. This was verified by lithiation of 3-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole and quenching with iodomethane to give only traces of 3-ethyl-2-methyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole. Reduction of 7 with NaBH4/CF3CO2H generated 2,3-diethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (8) in 60% yield. On occasion we found that this reduction stopped at the alcohol stage, the product of which upon treatment with base led to loss of acetaldehyde giving 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole. This novel retro-aldol-type reaction was discovered by us many years ago [28]. Indole 8 was treated with N-bromosuccinimide and benzoyl peroxide to give the desired dibromoindole 9 in high yield. In a two-step sequence 9 was converted to 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole 10 with benzylamine, and then debenzylated using Yang’s method [29] to give the hydrochloride salt 11. Treatment of 11 with Angeli’s salt (Na2N2O3) in the presence of dilute acid gave 3-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-2-vinylindole (13) via diazine 12 and deamination to generate 2,3-diethylidene 3 via a [1,5-H] shift in 18% overall yield from 9.
The structure of 13 as opposed to the isomeric 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14) was established by both 2D NMR and an independent synthesis of 14 (Scheme 3). In the latter event, reduction of 3-acetylindole 7 afforded alcohol 15, which was converted to mesylate 16 using Bassoli’s procedure [30]. During the reaction 16 eliminated methanesulfonate to give 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14) in modest yield. The NMR data (COSY, NOESY, chemical shifts) clearly distinguished 3-vinylindole 14 from 2-vinylindole 13. This observation of a [1,5-H] shift (3 to 13) during the formation of an indole-2,3-quinodiethane has been reported by Pindur [31] in his study of 1,4-dimethylpyrano[3,4-b]indol-3-one, and by Bergman [32] and Kano [33] during their syntheses of ellipticine.
To preclude the [1,5-H] shift process, we turned our attention to the possible generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 as shown in Scheme 4. N-phenylsulfonylation of 2,3-dimethylindole (18) gave 19, which was brominated as per Srinivasan [34,35] to give dibromide 20. Treatment of 20 with benzylamine afforded tetrahydropyrrole 21 in 62% yield. Debenzylation [29] with α-chloroethyl chloroformate gave the hydrochloride salt 22 in 86% yield. Treatment of 22 with Angeli’s salt in the presence of dilute HCl in aqueous MeOH generated indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 via diazine 23, and 17 dimerzied to the dimer 24 in 23% yield from 22. A similar dimerization of an indole-2,3-quinodimethane was described by Martinelli who isolated the BOC-protected version of 24 [6].
Attempts to trap 17 with p-benzoquinone and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate have been unsuccessful. For identification with the anticipated adduct of p-benzoquinone with 17, we prepared adduct 25 following Cava’s conditions [36] (Scheme 5).
The lack of our attempts thus far to trap indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 with external dienophiles is puzzling, but the isolation of both 2-vinylindole 13 and dimer 24 we believe is clear and convincing evidence of the novel generation of the respective indole-2,3-quinodimethanes 3 and 17 from 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles.

2. Experimental

2.1. General Methods

1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity Plus 300 or 500 T NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million using the residual proton or carbon signal (CDCl3: δH 7.27, δC 77.23) as an internal reference. The apparent multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet), and coupling constants (in Hz) are reported in that order in parentheses after the chemical shift. All melting points were determined on a Mel-Temp Laboratory Devices apparatus and are reported uncorrected. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on Whatman® regular TLC plates. Developed TLC plates were visualized using a 254-nm UV lamp and/or iodine. Flash chromatography employed 230–400 mesh Silicycle® silica gel. Infrared spectra (IR) were recorded with a Perkin Elmer® Series 1600 Fourier transform IR and are reported in reciprocal centimeters. IR spectra were obtained either by dissolving the sample in tetrachloroethene (TCE) or by making salt plates with potassium bromide (KBr). Ultraviolet (UV) spectra were recorded on an Agilent Technologies 8453 UV spectrophotometer. Gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectra (MS) were performed on a Shimadzu GCMS-QP5000 gas chromatograph mass spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed by Atlantic Microlab Inc. (Norcross, GA, USA). X-ray crystallography was performed by Professor Jerry Jasinski at Keene State College, Keene, NH, USA. High-resolution mass spectrometry was done at the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign). Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was dried on a commercial silica gel drying column before use. All alkyllithium reagents were purchased from either Aldrich®, Acros®, or Alfa Aesar® and were titrated when necessary with diphenylacetic acid. Temperatures of −78 °C were achieved by using an acetone/dry ice bath. Temperatures of −10 °C were reached by employing a sodium chloride solution/ice bath. All reaction flasks were oven-dried at 140 °C. Inert atmospheres of nitrogen were pre-dried by flow through a column of Drierite 4 mesh with indicator. All reactions were done under a positive flow of nitrogen unless otherwise stated. Degassing was accomplished with a manifold using the freeze, pump, and thaw method with nitrogen.

2.2. 1-(Phenylsulfonyl)indole (5)

A mixture of indole (4) (11.8 g, 0.101 mol), sodium hydroxide (12.9 g, 0.323 mol), and tetra-n-butylammonium hydrogen sulfate (1.30 g, 0.00383 mol) was stirred in methylene chloride (100 mL) at 0 °C. A solution of benzenesulfonyl chloride (15.5 mL, 0.122 mol) in methylene chloride (40 mL) was added dropwise via addition funnel. Upon addition of the solution the color of the suspension turned from grayish to blue to dark red. After 40 min it had turned light orange and it was allowed to warm to room temperature. The reaction mixture was filtered through a Celite pad and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo, leaving a red oil behind. The oil was treated with methanol (40 mL) and was subsequently stored at 4 °C. Crystal formation was observed almost instantaneously. Pale peach-colored crystals of 5 were obtained after vacuum filtration (24.4 g, 0.0948 mol, 94%): mp 75.5–77 °C (lit. [37] mp 77.5–79 °C); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.01 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.89 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.58 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz), 7.53 (d, 2H, J = 5.7 Hz), 7.45 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.32 (t, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.23 (d, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz), 6.68 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz); UV λmax (95% EtOH) 212, 250, 283 nm.

2.3. 2-Ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (6)

sec-Butyllithium in hexane (1.4 M, 4.10 mL, 5.74 mmol) was added dropwise via syringe to a solution of 1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (5) (1.22 g, 4.75 mmol) in anhydrous THF (30 mL) at −78 °C. The resulting bright orange solution was stirred for 30 min, after which iodoethane (0.38 mL, 4.75 mmol) was added quickly via syringe. The dark orange-brown solution was allowed to warm to room temperature and was subsequently poured onto saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (50 mL). The organic layer was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 25 mL), washed with brine (2 × 25 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give clear, colorless crystals of 6 (0.858 g, 3.00 mmol, 63%): mp 97–97.5 °C (lit. [38] mp 96–97.5 °C); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.19 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.75 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.53 (t, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.45–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.30–7.20 (m, 2H), 6.41 (s, 1H), 3.04 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.36 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz).

2.4. 3-Acetyl-2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (7)

Aluminum chloride (0.57 g, 4.3 mmol) and acetic anhydride (0.20 mL, 2.1 mmol) were stirred in methylene chloride (20 mL) at 0 °C. After 20 min a solution of 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (6) (0.19 g, 0.67 mmol) in methylene chloride (3.5 mL) was added dropwise to the yellow suspension via addition funnel. The solution was stirred for 2.5 h at 0 °C, after which it was poured over crushed ice (~100 mL). The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 20 mL), washed with brine (2 × 25 mL) and saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (25 mL), and was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated on the rotary evaporator, yielding a brown oil, which was stored at 4 °C. White crystals of 7 were obtained after vacuum filtration (0.14 g, 0.44 mmol, 65%): mp 71–73 °C (lit. [39] mp 92–93 °C); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.30–8.28 (m, 1H), 7.90–7.88 (m, 1H), 7.81 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.59 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.47 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.37–7.33 (m, 2H), 3.38 (q, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.66 (s, 3H), 1.37 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 195.9, 149.7, 139.2, 136.3, 134.5, 129.8 (2C), 127.4, 126.7 (2C), 125.0, 124.7, 121.0, 120.5, 115.2, 32.3, 21.1, 15.6; IR ν(TCE) 3394, 2978, 2471, 1884, 1801, 1672, 1533, 1448, 1385, 1224, 1182, 1122, 1093, 1056 cm−1.

2.5. 2,3-Diethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (8)

A sodium borohydride pellet (1.1 g, 29 mmol) was partially dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid (25 mL) at 0 °C under nitrogen. A solution of 3-acetyl-2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (7) (0.52 g, 1.6 mmol) in methylene chloride (30 mL) was added dropwise via addition funnel. The yellow solution was stirred overnight. It was diluted with distilled water (75 mL) and basified with sodium hydroxide pellets. The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 50 mL), washed with brine (3 × 50 mL), and was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated on the rotary evaporator, yielding white crystals with a tiny amount of red-brown oil. The product was purified via column chromatography (2:1 hexanes:ethyl acetate) to give 8 as a yellowish, crystalline substance (0.30 g, 0.96 mmol, 60%): mp 87–88 °C; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.19 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.68 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.49 (t, 1H, J = 6.5 Hz), 7.42 (d, 1H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.38 (t, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.28–7.22 (m, 2H), 3.01 (q, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.63 (q, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.31 (t, 3H, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.17 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 139.3, 138.8, 137.0, 133.6, 130.9, 129.3 (2C), 126.4 (2 C), 124.2, 123.6, 123.0, 118.7, 115.5, 20.0, 17.7, 16.0, 15.0; MS m/z 313 (M), 172 (100%), 157, 144, 115, 77; HRMS Calcd for C18H19NO2S: 313.1136; Found: 313.1138; Anal. Calcd for C18H19NO2S: C, 68.98; H, 6.11; N, 4.47; S, 10.23. Found: C, 69.22; H, 6.06; N, 4.48; S, 10.07.

2.6. 2,3-Bis-(1-bromoethyl)-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (9)

2,3-Diethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (8) (0.477 g, 1.52 mmol) was stirred in carbon tetrachloride (20 mL). N-Bromosuccinimide (0.548 g, 3.08 mmol) and benzoyl peroxide (0.0535 g, 0.387 mmol) were added. The orange suspension was heated to reflux for 2.5 h, after which it was allowed to cool to room temperature. The light orange-brown reaction mixture was poured onto distilled water (50 mL). The organic layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 25 mL), washed with distilled water (2 × 25 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, yielding 9 as a red-brown oil (0.579 g, 1.23 mmol, 81%); MS m/z 471 (M), 166, 115, 84 (100%); HRMS Calcd for C18H17Br2NO2S: 468.9347; Found: 468.9357.

2.7. 2-Benzyl-1,3-dimethyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,8-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (10)

A solution of benzylamine (0.16 mL, 1.5 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) was added slowly via addition funnel to a refluxing orange suspension of 2,3-bis-(1-bromoethyl)-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (9) (0.58 g, 1.2 mmol) and potassium carbonate (0.58 g, 4.2 mmol) in anhydrous THF (30 mL). It was refluxed for 14 h after which it was allowed to cool to room temperature. The light orange suspension was filtered through a Celite pad with methylene chloride. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo yielding 10 as an orange oil, which was immediately taken on to the next step without further purification: MS m/z 311 (M − 105), 170 (100%), 142, 115, 106, 91, 77.

2.8. 1,3-Dimethyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole Hydrogen Chloride (11)

A solution of α-chloroethyl chloroformate (0.17 mL, 1.5 mmol) in anhydrous methylene chloride (20 mL) was added dropwise via addition funnel to the reaction mixture of crude 2-benzyl-1,3-dimethyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,8-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (10) (0.51 g, 1.2 mmol) in anhydrous methylene chloride (30 mL), with stirring at −10 °C. The reaction mixture turned orange-brown. After 35 min the solvent was removed via vacuum pump. Methanol (20 mL) was added to the orange-brown residue. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 55 min, after which it was allowed to cool to room temperature. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo yielding 11 as a brown oil with a white solid. This crude product was taken on to the next step without any further purification: MS m/z 363 (M), 220 (100%), 141, 114, 77.

2.9. 3-Ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-2-vinylindole (13)

The crude product 11 (0.45 g, 1.2 mmol) was stirred in a mixture of methanol (20 mL) and distilled water (20 mL) at room temperature. Angeli’s salt (0.12 g, 1.2 mmol) was added quickly to the latté-colored reaction mixture. Hydrochloric acid (0.6 M, 2.1 mL, 1.2 mmol) was added via syringe. The reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min at room temperature, after which it was refluxed for 90 min and allowed to cool to room temperature, then cooled to −78 °C, and allowed to gradually warm to room temperature. Methylene chloride (20 mL) was added to the yellow-brown reaction mixture and the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 20 mL) and the combined organic extracts were washed with distilled water (2 × 30 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to afford a red-brown oil, which was purified via column chromatography, using first hexanes and then methylene chloride as eluent. The final fractions of the first column were purified via column chromatography, employing first n-pentane and then methylene chloride as eluent. Indole 13 was obtained as an orange oil (0.069 g, 0.22 mmol, 18%, 3 steps): 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.88–7.84 (m, 1H), 7.73 (d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz), 7.55–7.41 (m, 4H), 7.35 (t, 3H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.28 (t, 3H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.13 (q, 1H, JX = 11.4 Hz), 5.60 (dd, 1H, JM = 11.4 Hz), 5.41 (dd, 1H, JA = 17.4 Hz), 2.73 (q, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.17 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 133.7, 129.0 (3C), 128.0, 127.2, 126.9 (3C), 125.2, 123.9, 119.5, 115.5, 18.2, 15.1; MS m/z 311 (M), 170, 154, 144, 115, 84 (100%), 77, 51; HRMS calcd for C18H17O2NS: 311.0980; Found: 311.0971.

2.10. 2-Ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indol-3-yl-ethanol (15)

Ethanol (15 mL) and distilled water (15 mL) were added to a solution of 3-acetyl-2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (7) (0.107 g, 0.325 mmol) in THF (10 mL), and stirred at room temperature. The light-orange reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C. Sodium borohydride powder (0.0272 g, 0.719 mmol) was added quickly. The pale yellow reaction mixture was stirred overnight and then poured onto brine (100 mL). The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 25 mL), washed with brine (2 × 40 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give 15 as a pale yellow oil (0.100 g, 0.305 mmol, 94%): 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.81 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.72 (d, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.49 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.38 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.28 (t, 1H, J = 11.0 Hz), 7.23 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.17 (q, 1H, J = 6.5 Hz), 3.16–3.09 (m, 1H), 3.03–2.95 (m, 1H), 1.58 (d, 3H, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.29 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 139.2, 138.7, 137.0, 133.8, 129.3 (2C), 128.4, 126.3 (2C), 124.3, 123.6, 120.7, 115.2, 64.2, 23.7, 19.9, 16.1; IR ν(TCE) 3383, 3069, 2976, 2933, 2876, 1761, 1604, 1449, 1376, 1226, 1177, 1092, 1053, 957, 776, 752, 686, 584; MS m/z 311 (M − 18), 170 (100%), 155, 143, 128, 115, 77.

2.11. 2-Ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14)

Methanesulfonyl chloride (0.03 mL, 0.4 mmol) and triethylamine (0.5 mL, 4 mmol) were added via syringe to a solution of 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-indol-3-yl-ethanol (15) (0.1 g, 0.3 mmol) in anhydrous methylene chloride (15 mL), while stirring at room temperature. The solution was stirred for 7 days after which methylene chloride (25 mL) and saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (30 mL) were added. The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 25 mL), washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (30 mL) and distilled water (30 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo affording a yellow oil which was purified via column chromatography (first 2:1 hexanes: ethyl acetate, then methylene chloride). Indole 14 was obtained as a yellow oil (0.03 g, 0.09 mmol, 27%, 2 steps): 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.23 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.73 (d, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz), 752 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.40 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.33–7.26 (m, 2H), 6.76 (q, 1H, JX = 11.5 Hz), 5.75 (dd, 1H, JM = 17.5 Hz), 5.45 (dd, 1H, JA = 11.5 Hz), 3.11 (q, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.32 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 133.8 (2C), 129.4 (3C), 127.7, 126.4 (3C), 124.5 (2C), 124.0, 119.9, 116.9, 115.2 (2C), 20.1, 15.5; HRMS calcd for C18H17O2NS: 311.0980; Found: 311.0977.

2.12. 2,3-Dimethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (19)

Potassium hydride (2.62 g of 30 wt% mineral oil dispersion, 65.2 mmol) was washed with hexanes (1 × 20 mL, 2 × 10 mL). The remaining hexanes were removed in vacuo. Anhydrous THF (40 mL) was added via cannula. A solution of 2,3-dimethylindole (18) (2.01 g, 13.8 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) was added via cannula to the white suspension. Benzenesulfonyl chloride (1.77 mL, 13.8 mmol) was added dropwise via syringe to the yellow-brown reaction mixture. The reaction mixture turned green. It was poured onto crushed ice (250 mL). The organic layer was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 60 mL), washed with brine (2 × 60 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo yielding 19 as white-brown crystals, which were washed with methanol to give white crystals (1.81 g, 6.34 mmol, 46%): mp 131–133 °C (lit. [35] mp 140 °C); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.20 (d, 1h, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.52 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.43–7.38 (m, 3H), 7.31–7.24 (m, 3H), 2.53 (s, 3H), 2.14 (s, 3H).

2.13. 2,3-Bis(bromomethyl)-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (20)

2,3-Dimethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (19) (1.03 g, 3.61 mmol), N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (1.33 g, 7.39 mmol), and benzoyl peroxide (0.12 g, 0.87 mmol) were stirred in carbon tetrachloride (47 mL). The yellow reaction mixture was heated to reflux and refluxed for 3.5 h, after which it was allowed to cool to room temperature. The succinimide was filtered off via gravity filtration and then through a cotton plug. Distilled water was added (50 mL). The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 50 mL), washed with brine (2 × 50 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give 20 as yellow crystals, which were recrystallized with 4:1 hexanes:methylene chloride (1.11 g, 2.50 mmol, 69%): mp 132–133 °C (lit. [35] mp 138 °C); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.64–7.35 (m, 5H), 5.15 (s, 2H), 4.67 (s, 2H).

2.14. 2-Benzyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (21)

A solution of benzylamine (0.09 mL, 0.8 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) was added dropwise via addition funnel to a refluxing brown suspension of 2,3-dibromomethyl-1-phenylsulfonyl)indole (20) (0.31 g, 0.60 mmol) and potassium carbonate (0.35 g, 2.5 mmol) in anhydrous THF (30 mL). After 15 h the yellow-brown suspension was allowed to cool to room temperature and was filtered through a Celite pad with ethyl acetate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, yielding an orange oil, which was purified via column chromatography (2:1 hexanes: ethyl acetate). Indole 21 was obtained as a crystalline solid (0.14 g, 0.37 mmol, 62%): mp 149–151 °C (lit. [20] mp 151–152 °C); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.56 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.44 (q, 5H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.39 (s, 1H), 7.36–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.18 (m, 2H), 4.31 (t, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz), 4.05 (s, 2H), 3.95 (t, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz).

2.15. 4-(Phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]índole hydrogen chloride (22)

A clear, colorless solution of α-chloroethyl chloroformate (0.07 mL, 0.6 mmol) in anhydrous methylene chloride (10 mL) was added dropwise via addition funnel to a pale orange solution of 2-benzyl-4-(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (21) (0.2 g, 0.5 mmol) in anhydrous methylene chloride (10 mL) with stirring at −10 °C. The peach-colored solution was stirred for 1 h. The solvent was removed via vacuum pump. Methanol (10 mL) was added to the peach-colored, solid residue. The white suspension was refluxed for 1.75 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, yielding 22 as a gray-white solid. The solid was recrystallized with a mixture of hexanes:methylene chloride (1:1). A white solid was obtained (0.1 g, 0.4 mmol, 86%): mp 219–220°; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.91 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.59 (d, 1H, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.52 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.41–7.27 (m, 3H), 4.99 (s, 2H), 4.69 (s, 2H); Anal. Calcd for C16H15ClN2O2S: C, 57.40; H, 4.52; Cl, 10.59; N, 8.37; S, 9.58. Found: C, 55.58; H, 4.50; Cl, 10.58; N, 7.79; S, 8.96.

2.16. 2′-Methylene-1′,9-bis(phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,4,9-tetrahydrospiro[carbazole-3,3′-indoline; (Dimer 24)

4-(Phenylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]índole hydrogen chloride (22) (0.371 g, 1.11 mmol) and Angeli’s salt (0.112 g, 1.13 mmol) were stirred in a 1:1 mixture of methanol (15 mL) and distilled water (15 mL). Hydrochloric acid (0.6 M, 1.85 mL, 1.11 mmol) was added via syringe. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 27 min, after which it was refluxed for 2 h. It was allowed to cool to room temperature and was subsequently was cooled to −78 °C. It was allowed to gradually warm up to room temperature. The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 25 mL), washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (2 × 25 mL), and dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, yielding a red-brown oil, which was purified via column chromatography (2:1 hexanes: ethyl acetate). Dimer 24 was obtained as a tan solid (0.0731 g, 0.129 mmol, 23%): mp 134.5–135 °C; 1H-NMR (CD2Cl2) δ 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.91 (t, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.84 (d, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.63–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.51–7.43 (m, 4H), 7.37 (t, 3H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.31 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.24 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz), 5.83–4.78 (m, 2H), 4.27 (s, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz), 4.04 (s, 2H), 3.92 (s, 2H, J = 3.6 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 134.7 (2C), 134.6 (2C), 129.9 (4C), 127.0 (4C), 125.5 (2C), 125.4 (2C), 124.5 (2C), 123.9 (2C), 119.9 (2C), 119.7 (2C), 114.6 (2C), 114.5 (2C), 52.3, 51.0, 49.2, 47.6; MS m/z 566 (M), 532, 457, 387, 315, 284, 245, 220, 173, 142, 91 (100%); HRMS Calcd for C32H26N2O4S2: 566.1334; Found: 566.1328.

2.17. 5-Phenylsulfonyl-5H-benzo[b]carbazole-7,10-dione (25)

2,3-Dibromomethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (20) (0.50 g, 1.1 mmol), sodium iodide (1.2 g, 8.0 mmol), and p-benzoquinone (0.26 g, 2.4 mmol) were stirred in DMF (10.0 mL). The dark red-brown reaction mixture was heated to 78 °C and later cooled to 73.5 °C. It was heated for 18 h and was subsequently allowed to cool to room temperature. The dark-brown mixture was filtered through a Celite pad with methylene chloride. The filtrate was poured onto aqueous sodium bisulfite. The organic layer was extracted with methylene chloride (3 × 20 mL), washed with brine (2 × 20 mL), and dried first with sodium sulfate, then with anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo giving a brown oil, which was purified via column chromatography. Quinone 25 was obtained as a bright yellow solid (0.11 g, 0.28 mmol, 25%): mp 214 °C dec.; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 9.00 (s, 1H), 8.66 (s, 1H), 8.40 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.08 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.93 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.67 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.55–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.40 (t, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.05 (q, 2H, JAB = 10.2 Hz); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 184.9, 184.7, 139.5, 139.1, 134.7 (2C), 130.0 (2C), 129.7 (2C), 128.3, 126.9 (2C), 125.2, 125.1 (2C), 121.7 (2C), 119.4, 115.3, 113.4 (2C); UV λmax (95% EtOH) 195, 216, 284 nm; MS m/z 387 (M), 246 (100%), 218, 190, 164, 141, 115, 77; HRMS Calcd for C22H13NO4S: 387.0565; Found: 387.0556.

2.18. Angeli’s Salt (Sodium Trioxodinitrate)

The procedure of Addison was used [40]. A 21% solution of sodium ethoxide (17.7 mL, 47.4 mmol) in ethanol was added dropwise at 0 °C to a saturated solution of hydroxylamine hydrochloride (1.10 g, 15.8 mmol) in ethanol (30mL). A light-orange suspension formed. After 80 min the resulting precipitate was filtered off via gravity filtration. n-Butyl nitrate (2.32 mL, 15.8 mmol) was added via syringe at room temperature to the yellow filtrate. The filtrate was cooled in an ice bath. A cream-colored solid (0.764 g, 7.71 mmol, 49%) was collected via vacuum filtration and immediately used for the deamination reaction step.

Author Contributions

A.R. and G.W.G. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Dartmouth College.

Acknowledgments

This work is offered in memory of Pierre D. Lord.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cava, M.P.; Napier, D.R. Condensed cyclobutane aromatic systems. II. Dihalo derivatives of benzocyclobutene and benzocyclobutadiene dimer. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 1701–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Charlton, J.L.; Alauddin, M.M. Orthoquinodimethanes. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 2873–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Segura, J.L.; Martin, N. o-Quinodimethanes: Efficient intermediates in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3199–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, B.; Gao, S. Recent advances in the application of Diels–Alder reactions involving o-quinodimethanes, aza-o-quinone methides and o-quinone methides in natural product total synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7926–7953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matsuya, Y. Recent application of ortho-quinodimethane chemistry for synthesis of heterocyclic compounds. Heterocycles 2019, 98, 621–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marinelli, E.R. Generation and cycloaddition reactions of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 2745–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Magnus, P.; Gallagher, T.; Brown, P.; Pappalardo, P. The indole-2,3-quinodimethane strategy for the synthesis of indole alkaloids. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vice, S.F.; de Carvalho, H.N.; Taylor, N.G.; Dmitrienko, G.I. Indole-2,3-quinodimethanes: generation, reactivity and regioselective control of intermolecular Diels-Alder reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 7289–7292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pindur, U.; Erfanian-Abdoust, H. Indolo-2,3-quinodimethanes and stable cyclic analogues for regio- and stereocontrolled syntheses of [b]-anelated indoles. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1681–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fray, E.B.; Moody, C.J.; Shah, P. 1,4-Dihydropyrano[3,4-b]indol-3-ones as precursors to indole-2,3-quinodimethanes. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Laronze, M.; Sapi, J. 3-Cyanomethyl-2-vinylindoles as thermal indole-2,3-quinodimethane equivalents: synthesis of functionalized 1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocarbazoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7925–7928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Terzidis, M.; Tsoleridis, C.A.; Stephanidou-Stephanatou, J. Chromone-3-carboxaldehydes in Diels–Alder reactions with indole-o-quinodimethane. Synthesis of tetrahydrochromeno[2,3-b]carbazoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7239–7242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuroda, N.; Takahashi, Y.; Yoshinaga, K.; Mukai, C. A novel generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1843–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tsoleridis, C.A.; Dimtsas, J.; Hatzimimikou, D.; Stephanidou-Stephanatou, J. Reactivity and regioselectivity in the synthesis of spiroindoles via indole o-quinodimethanes. An experimental and computational study. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 4232–4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fuwa, H.; Sasaki, M. A new method for the generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes and 2-(N-alkoxycarbonylamino)-1,3-dienes. Intramolecular Heck/Diels–Alder cycloaddition cascade starting from acyclic α-phosphono enecarbamates. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2876–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fuwa, H.; Tako, T.; Ebine, M.; Sasaki, M. A new method for the generation of indole-2,3-quinodimethanes from allenamides. Chem. Lett. 2008, 37, 904–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pelkey, E.T.; Gribble, G.W. One-step syntheses of the pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole and pyrrolo[2,3-b]indole ring systems from 3-nitroindoles. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1873–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gribble, G.W.; Pelkey, E.T.; Switzer, F.L. New syntheses of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles, benzo[b]furo[2,3-c]pyrroles, and benzo[b]thieno[2,3-c]pyrroles. Utilizing the reaction of münchnones (1,3-oxazolium-5-olates) with nitroheterocycles. Synlett 1998, 1061–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gribble, G.W.; Pelkey, E.T.; Simon, W.M.; Trujillo, H.A. Regioselective 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions of unsymmetrical münchnones (1,3-oxazolium-5-olates) with 2- and 3-nitroindoles. A new synthesis of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 10133–10140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kishbaugh, T.L.S.; Gribble, G.W. Synthesis of N-substituted pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles from 2,3-dimethylindole. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 2003–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roy, S.; Kishbaugh, T.L.S.; Jasinski, J.P.; Gribble, G.W. 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of 2- and 3-nitroindoles with azomethine ylides. A new approach to pyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1313–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Badenock, J.C.; Fraser, H.L.; Gribble, G.W. A new approach to the pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole ring system. Arkivoc 2018, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lemal, D.M.; Rave, T.W. Diazenes from Angeli’s salt. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 393–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lemal, D.M.; McGregor, S.D. Dienes from 3-pyrrolines. A stereospecific deamination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 88, 1335–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Larock, R.C.; Yum, E.K. Synthesis of indoles via palladium-catalyzed heteroannulation of internal alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6689–6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Illi, V.O. Phase transfer-catalyzed N-sulfonation of indole. Synthesis 1979, 10, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ketcha, D.M.; Gribble, G.W. A convenient synthesis of 3-acylindoles via Friedel-Crafts acylation of 1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole. A new route to pyridocarbazole-5,11-quinones and ellipticine. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5451–5457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dolby, L.J.; Gribble, G.W. New reactions of 3-vinylindoles. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 6377–6386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, B.V.; O’Rourke, D.; Li, J. Mild and selective debenzylation of tertiary amines using α-chloroethyl chloroformate. Synlett 1993, 195–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bassoli, A.; Borgonovo, G.; Busnelli, G.; Morini, G.; Merlini, L. Monatin, its stereoisomers and derivatives: modeling the sweet taste chemoreception mechanism. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2518–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Erfanian-Abdoust, H.; Pindur, U. New reactivity of stable indole-2,3-quinodimethane equivalents: [4 + 2]-cycloaddition, cycloreversion, sigmatropic rearrangement, and elimination processes in the reactions of 1,4-dimethylpyrano[3,4-b]indol-3-one and 1-methylpyrido[3,4-b]indol-3-one with CC-dienophiles. Heterocycles 1989, 29, 1709–1719. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bergman, J.; Carlsson, R. Synthesis of the indole alkaloid ellipticine. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 4663–4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kano, S.; Sugino, E.; Shibuya, S.; Hibino, S. A new synthesis of the antitumor 6H-pyrido[4,3-b]carbazole alkaloid ellipticine. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2979–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mohanakrishnan, A.K.; Srinivasan, P.C. Unusual oxidation of 2 (or 3)-methylindole derivatives with active manganese dioxide. Synth. Comm. 2007, 25, 2407–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mohanakrishnan, A.K.; Srinivasan, P.C. Synthesis of 3-aryl-5h-pyrido[4,3-b]indoles. Synth. Comm. 2007, 25, 2415–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cava, M.P.; Deana, A.A.; Muth, K. Condensed cyclobutane aromatic compounds. VIII. The mechanism of formation of 1,2-dibromobenzocyclobutene; a new Diels–Alder synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 6458–6460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sundberg, R.J.; Russell, H.F. Syntheses with N-protected 2-lithioindoles. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 3324–3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gribble, G.W.; Keavy, D.J.; Davis, D.A.; Saulnier, M.G.; Pelcman, B.; Barden, T.C.; Sibi, M.P.; Olson, E.R.; BelBruno, J.J. Syntheses and Diels–Alder cycloaddition reactions of 4H-furo[3,4-b]indoles. A regiospecific Diels–Alder synthesis of ellipticine. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 5878–5891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sha, C.-K.; Yang, J.-F. Total syntheses of ellipticine alkaloids and their amino analogues. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 10645–10654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Addison, C.C.; Gamlen, G.A.; Thompson, R. The Ultra-violet absorption spectra of sodium hyponitrite and sodium α-oxyhyponitrite: The analysis of mixtures with sodium nitrite and nitrate. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are unfortunately not available from the authors.
Figure 1. Retrosynthesis of indole-2,3-quinodimethane (1) from 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (2).
Figure 1. Retrosynthesis of indole-2,3-quinodimethane (1) from 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (2).
Molecules 25 00261 g001
Scheme 1. Deamination of 3-pyrrolines with Angeli’s salt.
Scheme 1. Deamination of 3-pyrrolines with Angeli’s salt.
Molecules 25 00261 sch001
Scheme 2. Deamination of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (11) leading to 3-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-2-vinylindole (13).
Scheme 2. Deamination of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indole (11) leading to 3-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-2-vinylindole (13).
Molecules 25 00261 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 2-ethyl-1-(phenylsulfonyl)-3-vinylindole (14).
Molecules 25 00261 sch003
Scheme 4. Deamination of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole 22 leading to 2,3-dihydro-2,3-dimethylene-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (17) and dimer 24.
Scheme 4. Deamination of pyrrolo[3,4-b]indole 22 leading to 2,3-dihydro-2,3-dimethylene-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole (17) and dimer 24.
Molecules 25 00261 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of p-benzoquinone indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 adduct 25.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of p-benzoquinone indole-2,3-quinodimethane 17 adduct 25.
Molecules 25 00261 sch005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rinderspacher, A.; Gribble, G.W. The Generation of Indole-2,3-quinodimethanes from the Deamination of 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles. Molecules 2020, 25, 261. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25020261

AMA Style

Rinderspacher A, Gribble GW. The Generation of Indole-2,3-quinodimethanes from the Deamination of 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles. Molecules. 2020; 25(2):261. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25020261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rinderspacher, Alison, and Gordon W. Gribble. 2020. "The Generation of Indole-2,3-quinodimethanes from the Deamination of 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydropyrrolo[3,4-b]indoles" Molecules 25, no. 2: 261. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25020261

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop