Next Article in Journal
Src Mediates Epigallocatechin-3-O-Gallate-Elicited Acid Sphingomyelinase Activation
Next Article in Special Issue
Biotechnological Approaches on Two High CBD and CBG Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae) Varieties: In Vitro Regeneration and Phytochemical Consistency Evaluation of Micropropagated Plants Using Quantitative 1H-NMR
Previous Article in Journal
Exploitation of Ultrasound Technique for Enhancement of Microbial Metabolites Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Maceration and Ultrasonication for Green Extraction of Phenolic Acids from Echinacea purpurea Aerial Parts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 22
10.3390/molecules25225478
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Natural Approaches for Neurological Disorders—The Neuroprotective Potential of Codium tomentosum

by
Joana Silva
1,2,*,
Alice Martins
1,
Celso Alves
1,
Susete Pinteus
1,
Helena Gaspar
1,3,
Amparo Alfonso
2 and
Rui Pedrosa
4,*
1
MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Polytechnic of Leiria, 2520-630 Peniche, Portugal
2
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
3
BioISI—Biosystems and Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
4
MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Polytechnic of Leiria, 2520-630 Peniche, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(22), 5478; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25225478
Submission received: 3 November 2020 / Revised: 18 November 2020 / Accepted: 19 November 2020 / Published: 23 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Natural Compounds Research: Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, and is characterized by a progressive degeneration of the dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Although not completely understood, several abnormal cellular events are known to be related with PD progression, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the neuroprotective effects of Codium tomentosum enriched fractions in a neurotoxicity model mediated by 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) on SH-SY5Y human cells, and the disclosure of their mechanisms of action. Additionally, a preliminary chemical screening of the most promising bioactive fractions of C. tomentosum was carried out by GC-MS analysis. Among the tested fractions, four samples exhibited the capacity to revert the neurotoxicity induced by 6-OHDA to values higher or similar to the vitamin E (90.11 ± 3.74% of viable cells). The neuroprotective effects were mediated by the mitigation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, mitochondrial dysfunctions and DNA damage, together with the reduction of Caspase-3 activity. Compounds belonging to different chemical classes, such as terpenes, alcohols, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, esters, ketones, saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons were tentatively identified by GC-MS. The results show that C. tomentosum is a relevant source of neuroprotective agents, with particular interest for preventive therapeutics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases are estimated to surpass cancer as the second most common cause of death among the elderly [1]. For this reason, in recent years there has been a great deal of interest in the search for new, safer, and effective neuroprotective agents that can be used in the therapy of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) [1,2]. PD is one of the most impactful human diseases without an effective cure, making imperative the research on innovative therapeutics [3]. Worldwide, there is a growing interest in the development of more selective and effective therapeutic agents to prevent or to delay the progression of neurodegeneration [4].
PD involves the loss or degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and the accumulation of Lewy bodies, and abnormal intracellular aggregates containing proteins such as alpha-synuclein, sinfilin-1 and ubiquitin [5]. The etiology of PD remains largely unknown [6]; however, it is assumed that the main mechanisms involved in the development and progression of this disease are associated with oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and apoptosis, among others, which act together leading to degeneration of dopaminergic neurons [7].
Natural products obtained from marine organisms have been shown to be a potential source of novel therapeutic agents. Among these organisms, macroalgae have been reported for their ability to produce relevant bioactive compounds [8], mainly derived from their secondary metabolism as a defense response to environmental variations [2]. These metabolites are known to exhibit a broad range of bioactive properties such as antioxidant [9], antimicrobial [10], anti-inflammatory [11], anti-tumoral [12], and neuroprotective [13]. Thus, these metabolites can inspire the development of new drugs for the therapy of various pathologies, such as cancer, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases [2]. Concerning neurodegenerative disorders, the benefits of seaweed-derived components on the prevention and/or treatment of neurodegeneration were previously reported [14]. Recently, Souza and co-workers [15] reported the neuroprotective activity of kappa-carrageenan isolated from the seaweed Hypnea musciformis on 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced neurotoxicity on SH-SY5Y cells by modulation of the mitochondrial membrane potential and the decrease of Caspase-3 activity. Wen and co-workers [16] showed that the compound austrasulfone isolated from the marine soft coral Cladiella australis has potent neuroprotective effects against the 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity on the neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line, as well as anti-inflammatory activity on RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. Additionally, studies carried out by Gao and co-workers [17] demonstrated the neuroprotective effect of the sulfated polysaccharide fucoidan on PC12 cells by blocking the H2O2-induced apoptosis, scavenging ROS formation and reducing lactate dehydrogenase activity. The authors verified that this fucoidan protected the neurocytes against H2O2-induced apoptosis via reducing ROS levels and activating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.
In the present work, the green macroalgae C. tomentosum, found in the intertidal zone of the Portuguese coast [18] was evaluated for its ability to produce neuroprotective substances. The number of studies focusing on the biological potential of this species is limited, since only one report has revealed the antioxidant, anti-genotoxic, anti-tumorigenic and hypoglycemic potential of crude ethanolic extracts [18]. On the other hand, Silva and co-workers [13] demonstrated the neuroprotective capacity of C. tomentosum methanol and dichloromethane crude extracts, highlighting the need to pursue the investigation focused on the therapeutic potential of this species. Thus, the present work is aimed at the fractionation and identification of the bioactive molecules produced by C. tomentosum, the evaluation of their antioxidant activity, and the understanding of the mechanisms behind their neuroprotective effects.

2. Results

2.1. Yields, Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Codium tomentosum Fractions

Freeze-dried samples of green seaweed C. tomentosum were sequentially extracted overnight with methanol (MeOH) and dichloromethane (DCM) (in a biomass/solvent ratio of 1:40) with constant stirring at room temperature. The resulting solutions were filtrated, and the organic phases were evaporated in a rotary evaporator (IKA HB10), at 30 °C. Each crude extract was fractionated by vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) affording a total of 14 fractions (MF1-7 and DF1-7, respectively). An overview of extraction and fractionation sequences is depicted in Figure 1.
The amounts of phenolic compounds and the antioxidant activity of all these fractions were evaluated.
The fractionation yields, the total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant capacity assessed through 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) scavenging activity, oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays of the different fractions obtained from the green seaweed C. tomentosum are summarized in Table 1.
As shown in Table 1, the highest fractionation yields were achieved through the elution with methanol (DF6—13.88%; MF6—6.73%), and acetone (MF7—16.90%; DF7—8.58%), while lower yields were obtained with the less polar solvent cyclohexane (MF1—0.09%; DF1—0.57%).
Regarding the amounts of phenolic compounds, DF2 fraction from dichloromethane crude extract presented the highest TPC (10.43 ± 0.40 mg GAE/g extract) followed by MF4 fraction from methanolic crude extract (7.30 ± 0.47 GAE/g extract). On the other hand, MF1 and MF7 fractions presented the lowest TPC (2.24 ± 0.15 GAE/g extract and 2.47 ± 0.05 GAE/g extract, respectively). Concerning the antioxidant activities, none of the fractions demonstrated potential to reduce the DPPH radical. In the ORAC assay, DF7 fraction showed the highest antioxidant activity (193.85 ± 14.30 µmol TE/g extract) followed by DF6 (165.34 ± 6.42 µmol TE/g extract) and DF4 (144.15 ± 2.02 µmol TE/g extract) fractions, respectively. MF2 fraction exhibited the lowest capacity to reduce peroxyl radicals (28.92 ± 0.51 µmol TE/g extract). Fractions DF3 (825.73 ± 32.59 µM FeSO4/g extract), DF4 (1008.27 ± 18.18 µM FeSO4/g extract) and DF5 (636.21 ± 22.21 µM FeSO4/g extract) revealed the highest efficiency to reduce ferric ions, while the lowest activity was displayed by DF1 (24.40 ± 1.22 µM FeSO4/g extract).

2.2. Neurotoxicity and Neuroprotective Effects of Codium tomentosum Fractions on SH-SY5Y Cells

The neurotoxic effects of C. tomentosum fractions (100 µg/mL; 24 h) were evaluated on SH-SY5Y cells. All the non-toxic fractions were then evaluated for their neuroprotective potential on SH-SY5Y exposed to the neurotoxic effects of 6-OHDA (100 µM). Cell viability was estimated by the MTT assay and results are presented in Figure 2.
Among all fractions, only three induced a significant reduction of SH-SY5Y cells’ viability (Figure 2A): MF3 from methanolic crude extract (72.27 ± 3.56% of viable cells); DF6 (38.09 ± 2.41% of viable cells) and DF7 (60.02 ± 9.66% of viable cells) from DCM crude extract. Thus, the neuroprotective evaluation was conducted on the remaining non-toxic fractions. The exposition of SH-SY5Y cells to 6-OHDA (100 µM) for 24 h led to a reduction of cell viability of about 42% (58.92 ± 2.49% of viable cells) when compared to vehicle (100 ± 1.85% of viable cells). However, when SH-SY5Y cells were exposed to 6-OHDA, in the presence of C. tomentosum fractions (100 µg/mL), four samples exhibited capacity to revert (30–50%) the neurotoxicity induced by 6-OHDA to values similar to the vitamin E standard (90.11 ± 3.74% of viable cells) (Figure 2B): MF2 (108.50 ± 4.53% of viable cells); DF1 (104.8% ± 3.85% of viable cells); DF2 (89.15 ± 2.23% of viable cells); and DF5 (93.19 ± 2.53% of viable cells).

2.3. Neuroprotective Effects of Codium tomentosum Fractions on PD Hallmarks

To investigate whether the neuroprotective effects mediated by C. tomentosum fractions on SH-SY5Y cells’ viability are associated with PD, several hallmarks were studied, namely oxidative stress, apoptosis, ROS production, changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, and Caspase-3 activity. The results are depicted in Figure 3.
The exposition of SH-SY5Y cells to 6-OHDA led to a marked increase of ROS levels (203.1 ± 17.78%) when compared to vehicle (100.00 ± 3.53%) (Figure 3A). In the presence of C. tomentosum fractions, all of them induced a significant decrease of the ROS levels being the highest reduction mediated by DF1 and DF5 fractions (101.58 ± 8.44% and 101.17 ± 4.15%, respectively).
To understand if the neuroprotective effects of C. tomentosum fractions were mediated by biological events on mitochondria, possible changes on MMP were studied. The exposition of SH-SY5Y cells to 6-OHDA induced a strong depolarization of the MMP (376.40 ± 39.96%) when compared with the vehicle (100.00 ± 2.05%) (Figure 3B). On the other hand, the treatment conducted with seaweed fractions exhibited a preventive effect on MMP against the depolarization induced by 6-OHDA (376.40 ± 39.96%), with the highest effect being mediated by MF2 (114.90 ± 4.04%) and DF5 fractions (128.60 ± 15.83%). Caspase-3 activity was determined to understand if the neuroprotective effects of C. tomentosum fractions were mediated by apoptotic pathways. The exposure of SH-SY5Y cells to 6-OHDA increased its activity (381.30 ± 57.13%) when compared with the vehicle (100.00 ± 4.83%) (Figure 3C). On the other hand, the treatment with MF2 (62.70 ± 5.59%), DF2 (107.10 ± 18.77%), and DF5 (74.43 ± 3.55%) fractions led to a marked decrease in Caspase-3 activity.

2.4. Chemical Characterization of Codium tomentosum Bioactive Fractions

A preliminary chemical characterization of the most bioactive fractions (MF2, DF1, DF2 and DF5) of C. tomentosum was performed by GC-MS. The compounds were tentatively identified by matching their mass spectra with those of reference compounds stored in the GC-MS mass spectral databases, evidencing the presence of different chemical groups such as terpenes, alcohols, carboxylic acids, esters, ketones and hydrocarbons. In fraction MF2, the presence of alkenes (1-docosene, 9-eicosene, 1-hexacosene), the fatty alcohol 1-tricosanol, and the glycol 1,2-octodecanediol was verified. Three alkanes (cyclohexadecane, eicosane, docosane), the heptafluorobutanoic acid and sebacic acid, bis (2-ethylhexyl) ester, one alcohol (2-hexyl-1-decanol), and one aldehyde (octadecanal) were detected in fraction DF1. Regarding fraction DF2, besides 2-methylundecanal and pentafluoropropionic acid, heptadecyl ester, the alcohols 2-hexyl-1-decanol and 1-tricosanol were also identified in this fraction. Finally, the monoterpenoid lactone loliolide, together with the glycol 1,2-octadecanediol, and the hexanedioic acid, bis (2-ethylhexyl) ester, were detected in fraction DF5. A terpene ketone (perhydrofarnesyl acetone) was present in fractions MF2, DF2, and DF5. Although in small amounts, these last two fractions also evidenced the presence of two peaks with characteristic mass fragmentation patterns of sterols. Additional data concerning compounds identification are available in Table S1 (Supplementary Information).

3. Discussion

Marine compounds have shown potential as possible therapeutic agents that can slow the processes associated with neuronal cell loss in neurodegenerative diseases, having ability to act in distinct biological targets.
Oxidative stress is believed to be one of the main triggers of neurodegenerative diseases, particularly in PD, and several studies have been carried out to understand the neuroprotective effects of antioxidant molecules [19]. These molecules have been widely discussed by several researchers as a possible therapy against neuronal death, as they have the ability to neutralize free radicals. In the present study, the antioxidant and neuroprotective potential of fractions from the green seaweed C. tomentosum were evaluated. Regarding their antioxidant capacity, three complementary methods (DPPH, FRAP, ORAC) were assayed and the results correlated with total phenolic content (TPC). None of the tested fractions showed significant antioxidant potential, which can be correlated with their low TPC levels. These results are in accordance with those reported by Pinteus and co-workers [9], who conducted an antioxidant screening of 27 algae collected from the Peniche coast (Portugal) in which green algae also did not show a relevant antioxidant capacity, when compared with other red and brown species. In recent years, the antioxidant potential of seaweeds has been fully documented in the literature [8,9,19], and has been attributed to the presence of a wide variety of chemical structures with high antioxidant capacity such as phenols, flavonoids, phlorotannins, sulfated polysaccharides and ascorbic acid [20].
Several mechanisms are involved in neuroprotection and, although without an expressive antioxidant ability, C. tomentosum fractions were evaluated for their neuroprotective potential in an in vitro model of PD. Marine extracts and derived compounds have been previously reported by several studies to exhibit neuroprotective effects against 6-OHDA neurotoxicity and, consequently, this model has been widely used to mimic experimental models of PD [8,13,20,21]. In this study, it is shown that C. tomentosum fractions are able to promote cells recover from the toxicity induced by 6-OHDA exposition. Our results are consistent with other studies in which C. tomentosum dichloromethane extracts increased neuronal cells’ viability in 35%, blocking the toxic effects of 6-OHDA [13]. Although the mechanisms responsible for inducing cell death in PD have not been totally clarified, oxidative stress is clearly involved, due to an increase of ROS, resulting in mitochondrial impairment, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, and cell death [21,22].
Producing about 90% of cellular ROS, mitochondria have a major role in oxidative stress related diseases. In fact, mitochondrial dysfunction has long been implicated in PD pathogenesis [23]. The production of ROS by inhibition of Complex I is a key mechanism for dopaminergic (DA) neuronal damage as DA neurons are susceptible to oxidative stress due to dopamine autoxidation. The generation of ROS also induces the damage of Complex I and III and the oxidation of mitochondrial and cytoplasmic proteins, leading to their dysfunction [23,24]. Based on the results obtained in the present work, it was found that DF1, DF2 and DF5 fractions were able to prevent ROS production and mitochondrial dysfunction promoted by 6-OHDA. These results are in agreement with those previously obtained with the seaweed Bifurcaria bifurcata [8], in which its dichloromethane fractions prevented cell death, maintained mitochondrial function and reduced ROS production. Souza et al. [15] also demonstrated, in the same in vitro model, that kappa-carrageenan from the algae Hypnea musciformis, prevented mitochondrial potential changes and reduced H2O2 production. Additionally, several authors reported the neuroprotective properties of seaweed derived polysaccharides on 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells [24,25,26].
Besides oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis has also been implicated in neuronal death in PD [27]. These mechanisms are mediated by several initiators and executer caspases, via intrinsic or extrinsic pathways. The initiating caspases (-9 and -8) converge onto a common pathway of executioner caspases involving Caspase -3 and -6. The activation of executioner caspases leads to morphological features of apoptosis, such as DNA cleavage and its subsequent fragmentation. Based on the results presented here, it was verified that fractions MF2, DF2, and DF5 prevented the increase of Caspase -3 activity promoted by 6-OHDA.
A preliminary chemical screening of C. tomentosum most promising bioactive fractions was carried out by GC-MS analysis, and several compounds belonging to different chemical classes were identified, e.g., terpenes, fatty alcohols, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, esters, ketones, saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons. Accordingly, Valentão et al. [18] also detected compounds belonging to some of the above described chemical classes in C. tomentosum, collected at Espinho coast (Portugal). The GC-MS analysis of other Codium species, like C. bursa, also suggested the presence of components belonging to the above described structural groups [26]. Numerous constituents from natural resources, namely those of marine origin having different structural features are reported for their neuroprotective properties [28,29,30,31]. Among the less polar compounds, there is great evidence that lipids play a central role in PD [32]; however, current data are still too preliminary, and more detailed studies about this issue are needed. Nevertheless, given the lipidic richness of C. tomentosum [18,33,34,35], the hypothesis that lipidic and other less polar constituents, including sterols [36], can be involved in the neuroprotection must not be discarded. As reported by Zhang et al. [37] the lipophilicity enhances the blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration ability, even though BBB penetration is a highly complex process and a result of many cooperative effects. Effectively, one of the main bottlenecks associated with the development of new therapeutics for PD is the difficulty of many drugs to reach the brain, due to this highly selective semi-permeant barrier that protects brain and the spinal cord from many foreign substances. It is critical the development of deeper investigation studies in more complex in vitro models, such as co-cultures, to understand the ability of C. tomentosum-derived compounds to cross the BBB, and the possibility of their incorporation in smart delivery systems such as nanoparticles for brain drug delivery, tissue engineering, and new biomaterials [38]. This strategy will contribute to refine the selection of the most active compounds with neuroprotective potential suppressing the gap between in vitro and in vivo assays.
In conclusion, the current lack of studies on seaweed-derived neuroprotective agents evidences the relevance of C. tomentosum as a source of new compounds with potential neuroprotective properties, opening new research lines. This work showed that its bioactive fractions markedly inhibited 6-OHDA neurotoxicity induced in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Our results suggest that the neuroprotective effects are mediated by the mitigation of ROS generation and mitochondrial dysfunctions, together with the reduction of Caspase-3 activity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on the neuroprotective capacity of C. tomentosum in the in vitro PD model here described. Work is ongoing regarding the isolation and chemical characterization of promising constituents from the most bioactive fractions as well as compounds’ bioavailability studies on in vitro models that mimic the BBB. Nevertheless, the possibility of synergistic effects between the identified constituents need to be considered and can be regarded as an advantage, since Codium spp. is an edible seaweed that can be explored for nutraceutical and prophylactic purposes to overcome PD impairments.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Collection and Preparation of Codium tomentosum Samples

The green seaweed Codium tomentum Stackouse, 1797 was collected in October 2016 at Peniche coast, Portugal (39°37′05″ N, −9°38′58″ O), and transported to MARE-Polytechnic of Leiria lab facilities. The seaweed was rinsed carefully with seawater and distilled water to remove epiphytes, sand and debris. Then, it was freeze-dried (Scanvac Cool Safe, LaboGene, Lynge, Denmark), ground, and stored in a cool place protected from light, until further use.

4.2. Seaweed Extraction and Fractionation

Freeze-dried samples of C. tomentosum (445 g) were sequentially extracted with methanol (MeOH) and dichloromethane (DCM) (VWR-BDH Chemicals, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France) (in a biomass/solvent ratio of 1:40) with constant stirring, overnight. Crude dried extracts were obtained using a rotary evaporator (IKA HB10, Staufen, Germany) and/or a speed vacuum equipment (Concentrator Plus, Eppendorf, Spain). The MeOH (112.64 g, 25.31%) and DCM (6.47 g, 1.45%) crude extracts were subjected to a normal phase vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) on silica gel 60 (0.06–0.2 mm, VWR, Leuven, Belgium). Elution was performed by using cyclohexane with increasing amounts of ethyl acetate (v/v) as the mobile phase: 1:0 (MF1, 0.02 g; DF1, 0.06 g), 2:1 (MF2, 0.66 g; DF2, 0.16 g), 2:2 (MF3, 0.18 g; DF3, 0.15 g) 1:2 (MF4, 0.11 g; DF4, 0.10 g) 0:1 (MF5, 0.13 g; DF5, 0.63 g), MeOH (MF6,1.35 g; DF6, 1.39 g), and acetone (MF7, 3.38 g; DF7 0.86 g), 400 mL of each eluent (Figure 1). Fractionation yields were determined in relation to biomass of freeze-dried seaweed. The fractions attained were subjected to a series of in vitro biological assays, in order to evaluate their antioxidant and neuroprotective potential.

4.3. Quantification of Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

The TPC of C. tomentosum fractions was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) according to the method described by Singleton et al. [39] with slight modifications [8]. After 1 h of reaction in the dark, the absorbance was measured at 755 nm (Synergy H1 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, BioTek® Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). Gallic acid was used as standard and TPC is expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry extract (mg GAE/g of extract).

4.4. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity

4.4.1. 2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity

The ability of C. tomentosum fractions to scavenge the DPPH radical was determined according to the protocol described by Pinteus et al. [9]. Briefly, the reaction mixtures were incubated in the dark, for 30 min, at room temperature. The absorbance was then measured at 517 nm. The samples were tested at a maximum concentration of 100 µg/mL. A dose-response analysis (10–100 µg/mL) was performed for the samples with DPPH reduction >50% for EC50 determination.

4.4.2. Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC-Fluorescein)

The ability of seaweed fractions to neutralize peroxyl free radicals avoiding fluorescein oxidation was accomplished according to the protocol described by Dávalos et al. [40]. Samples (20 µL), and fluorescein (120 µL; 70 nM, final concentration) were added to a 96-well microplate and pre-incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. Ending this time, AAPH (2,2′-Azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, Barcelona, Spain) solution (60 µL; 12 mM, final concentration) was added quickly. The microplate was immediately placed in the reader and the fluorescence (λ excitation: 458 nm; λ emission: 520 nm) recorded every minute, for 240 min. Trolox (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as an antioxidant standard. The results are expressed in µmol of Trolox equivalents/g of dry extract (µmol TE/g of extract).

4.4.3. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

The capacity of seaweed fractions to reduce F3+ to F2+ through electron donation was performed according to Benzie and Strain [41] with slight modifications [8]. FRAP reagent was prepared freshly with 0.3 M acetate buffer (pH = 3.6), 10 mM of 2,4,6-tri(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine, (TPTZ) (Alfa Aesar, Kandel, Germany) in 40 mM HCl and 20 mM ferric solution using FeCl3 (10:1:1) and pre-heated at 37 °C. Briefly, 2 µL of C. tomentosum samples were added to 198 µL of FRAP reagent and incubated at 37 °C in the dark for 30 min. FeSO4 was used as standard, and the absorbance was then read at 593 nm. The difference between the absorbance of test fractions and the blank reading was calculated, and results expressed as µM of FeSO4/g of extract (µM FeSO4/g of extract).

4.5. Evaluation of the Neuroprotective Potential of Codium tomentosum

4.5.1. Cell Culture Maintenance Conditions

The biological activities of fractions were conducted on an in vitro cellular model of human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y cells, strain number ACC 209) previously acquired from DSMZ (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH) biobank. The cells were cultured according to the supplier’s instructions. SH-SY5Y cells grew in DMEM:F12 medium (Biowest, Riverside, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Biowest, Riverside, MO, USA) and 1% of antibiotic mixture constituted by 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma, Rehovot, Israel). SH-SY5Y cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

4.5.2. Neurotoxic and Neuroprotective Potential

The neurotoxicity was evaluated on SH-SY5Y cells at 75–85% of total confluence. Cells were treated with seaweed fractions (100 μg/mL) for 24 h to determine and select the non-neurotoxic samples/concentrations for the next assays. Regarding the neuroprotective assay, SH-SY5Y cells were exposed to 6-OHDA (100 µM) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in the presence/absence of non-neurotoxic seaweed fractions (100 µg/mL). The effects on SH-SY5Y cells’ viability was then estimated by the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) assay (VWR, Solon, OH, USA). Cells were incubated with MTT (1.2 mM) for 1 h at 37 °C. Ending this time, 100 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were added, and the absorbance read at 570 nm (Synergy H1 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, BioTek® Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). The results were expressed as percentage of the control.

4.5.3. Neuroprotective Effects on PD Biomarkers

Determination of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Levels

The ROS levels were determined using the oxidation sensitive fluoroprobe 5(6)-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (carboxy-H2DCFDA) (Invitrogen, Bleiswijk, Netherlands) according to Ouazia et al. [42] with slight modifications. Briefly, SH-SY5Y cells were exposed to 6-OHDA (100 μM) in the presence/absence of seaweed fractions (100 μg/mL) for 6 h. Cells were then washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with carboxy-H2DCFDA (20 μM) probe, previously dissolved in serum-free medium for 1 h at 37 °C. Ending this time, the fluorescence was read (λ excitation: 527 nm; λ emission: 495 nm).

Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (MMP)

Analysis of MMP was performed using the JC-1 fluorescent dye (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) according to Silva et al. [8]. SH-SY5 cells were exposed to 6-OHDA (100 μM) in the presence/absence of seaweed fractions (100 μg/mL) for 6 h. Cells were then washed with PBS and incubated with JC-1 solution (3 µM) in the dark, for 15 min, at 37 °C. After this time, the JC-1 dye was removed, and PBS was added to wells. The fluorescence was read at 530 nm (monomers) and at 590 nm (aggregates) and 490 nm emission/excitation wavelengths, respectively. The results were calculated from the ratio between JC-1 monomers and aggregates and are expressed in percentage of control.

Caspase-3 Activity

Caspase-3 activity was evaluated using the caspase-3 fluorometric assay kit (CASP3F-KIT, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturers´ instructions. Briefly, SH-SY5Y cells were treated with 6-OHDA (100 μM) in the presence/absence of seaweed fractions (100 μg/mL) for 6 h. Ending treatment time, cells were washed with PBS, harvested, and enzyme activity determined by reading the fluorescence at 360 nm and 460 nm emission and excitation wavelengths, respectively. The results were calculated from the slope of the curve and are expressed in percentage of control.

4.6. Chemical Characterization of Codium tomentosum Bioactive Samples

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

GC–MS qualitative analysis was performed in a Shimadzu QP2010-Plus GC/MS system equipped with a TRB5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 µm film thickness) capillary column (Teknokroma, Barcelona, Spain) operating in the linear velocity mode. The carrier gas was helium 5.0 (Linde, Lisboa, Portugal), with a constant flow of 1 mL/min. Samples were dissolved in dichloromethane and automatically injected. Injections were performed in split mode, with a ratio of 1/9. The injector port was heated to 280 °C. The initial column temperature of 60 °C was held for 2 min, followed by a temperature ramp of 30 °C/min to 300 °C held for 15 min. All mass spectra were acquired in electron impact (EI) mode at 70 eV. The operate temperatures were 200 °C for MS ion source, and 250 °C for the liner interface. Analysis were performed in full scan mode with mass ranging from 10 to 800 m/z. Compounds were identified by matching the mass fragmentation patterns with those stored in the GC-MS mass spectral databases (Wiley 229 and NIST-National Institute of Standards and Technology libraries).

4.7. Data and Statistical Analysis

When applicable, results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The determination of EC50 was attained from sigmoidal dose–response variable-slope curves using the GraphPad Prism v.8 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple comparison of group means was employed to determine significant differences relatively to the control treatment. All other post hoc analyses were conducted using Tukey’s test. All data were checked for normality and homoscedasticity. Comparisons concerning variables, which did not meet variance or distributional assumptions, were carried out with Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric tests. At least three independent experiments were carried out in triplicate.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Table S1: Identification of compounds in Codium tomentosum bioactive fractions by GC-MS.

Author Contributions

J.S. and C.A. did main experiments (antioxidant, cytotoxicity, neuroprotective, signal pathway mechanisms), A.M. and S.P. were involved in the extraction and fractionation processes. A.M. and H.G. were involved in chemical characterization procedures. J.S., A.M., C.A. and S.P. drafted the document. All the authors were involved in the research topic and designed the study. R.P. and A.A. coordinated the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and are accountable for the integrity of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the strategic project UID/MAR/04292/2020 to MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre and UID/Multi/04046/2020 and UIDB/04046/2020 granted to BioISI—BioSystems and Integrative Sciences Institute, through POINT4PAC project (Oncologia de Precisão: Terapias e Tecnologias Inovadoras, SAICTPAC/0019/2015-LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-016405), through CROSS-ATLANTIC project (PTDC/BIA-OUT/29250/2017), co-financed by COMPETE (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029250) and through Molecules for Health project (PTDC/BIA-BQM/28355/2017). This work was also funded by the Integrated Programme of SR&TD Smart Valorization of Endogenous Marine Biological Resources Under a Changing Climate (Centro-01-0145-FEDER-000018), co-funded by Centro 2020 Programme, Portugal 2020, European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful for the financial support of the Projects and Programmes described in the funding section. FCT is also acknowledged for the grants attributed to JS (SFRH/BD/103255/2014), and SP (SFRH/BD/96203/2013).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pangestuti, R.; Kim, S.-K. Neuroprotective effects of marine algae. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 803–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. El Gamal, A.A. Biological importance of marine algae. Saudi Pharm. J. 2010, 18, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Harris, J.R. Protein Aggregation and Fibrillogenesis in Cerebral and Systemic Amyloid Disease; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 65. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hussain, R.; Zubair, H.; Pursell, S.; Shahab, M. Neurodegenerative diseases: Regenerative mechanisms and novel therapeutic approaches. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Radhakrishnan, D.M.; Goyal, V. Parkinson’s disease: A review. Neurol. India 2018, 66, 26. [Google Scholar]
  6. Del Rey, N.L.-G.; Quiroga-Varela, A.; Garbayo, E.; Carballo-Carbajal, I.; Fernández-Santiago, R.; Monje, M.H.; Trigo-Damas, I.; Blanco-Prieto, M.J.; Blesa, J. Advances in Parkinson’s disease: 200 years later. Front. Neuroanat. 2018, 12, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Sarkar, S.; Raymick, J.; Imam, S. Neuroprotective and therapeutic strategies against Parkinson’s disease: Recent perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Silva, J.; Alves, C.; Freitas, R.; Martins, A.; Pinteus, S.; Ribeiro, J.; Gaspar, H.; Alfonso, A.; Pedrosa, R. Antioxidant and Neuroprotective Potential of the Brown Seaweed Bifurcaria bifurcata in an in vitro Parkinson’s Disease Model. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pinteus, S.; Silva, J.; Alves, C.; Horta, A.; Fino, N.; Rodrigues, A.I.; Mendes, S.; Pedrosa, R. Cytoprotective effect of seaweeds with high antioxidant activity from the Peniche coast (Portugal). Food Chem. 2017, 218, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pinteus, S.; Alves, C.; Monteiro, H.; Araújo, E.; Horta, A.; Pedrosa, R. Asparagopsis armata and Sphaerococcus coronopifolius as a natural source of antimicrobial compounds. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mhadhebi, L.; Mhadhebi, A.; Robert, J.; Bouraoui, A. Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory and Antiproliferative Effects of Aqueous Extracts of Three Mediterranean Brown Seaweeds of the Genus Cystoseira. Iran J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 207–220. [Google Scholar]
  12. Alves, C.; Pinteus, S.; Rodrigues, A.; Horta, A.; Pedrosa, R. Algae from Portuguese coast presented high cytotoxicity and antiproliferative effects on an in vitro model of human colorectal cancer. Pharmacogn. Res. 2018, 10, 24. [Google Scholar]
  13. Silva, J.; Alves, C.; Pinteus, S.; Mendes, S.; Pedrosa, R. Neuroprotective effects of seaweeds against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced cell death on an in vitro human neuroblastoma model. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hannan, M.A.; Dash, R.; Haque, M.N.; Mohibbullah, M.; Sohag, A.A.M.; Rahman, M.A.; Uddin, M.J.; Alam, M.; Moon, I.S. Neuroprotective potentials of marine algae and their bioactive metabolites: Pharmacological insights and therapeutic advances. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Souza, R.B.; Frota, A.F.; Silva, J.; Alves, C.; Neugebauer, A.Z.; Pinteus, S.; Rodrigues, J.A.G.; Cordeiro, E.M.S.; de Almeida, R.R.; Pedrosa, R. In vitro activities of kappa-carrageenan isolated from red marine alga Hypnea musciformis: Antimicrobial, anticancer and neuroprotective potential. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 112, 1248–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wen, Z.-H.; Chao, C.-H.; Wu, M.-H.; Sheu, J.-H. A neuroprotective sulfone of marine origin and the in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of an analogue. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 5998–6004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, Y.; Dong, C.; Yin, J.; Shen, J.; Tian, J.; Li, C. Neuroprotective effect of fucoidan on H2O2-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells via activation of PI3K/Akt pathway. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2012, 32, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Valentão, P.; Trindade, P.; Gomes, D.; de Pinho, P.G.; Mouga, T.; Andrade, P.B. Codium tomentosum and Plocamium cartilagineum: Chemistry and antioxidant potential. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1359–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Niedzielska, E.; Smaga, I.; Gawlik, M.; Moniczewski, A.; Stankowicz, P.; Pera, J.; Filip, M. Oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 4094–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kim, D.-W.; Lee, K.-T.; Kwon, J.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, D.; Mar, W. Neuroprotection against 6-OHDA-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells by 5, 7-Dihydroxychromone: Activation of the Nrf2/ARE pathway. Life Sci. 2015, 130, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferlazzo, N.; Cirmi, S.; Maugeri, A.; Russo, C.; Lombardo, G.E.; Gangemi, S.; Calapai, G.; Mollace, V.; Navarra, M. Neuroprotective Effect of Bergamot Juice in 6-OHDA-Induced SH-SY5Y Cell Death, an In Vitro Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rodriguez-Pallares, J.; Parga, J.; Munoz, A.; Rey, P.; Guerra, M.; Labandeira-Garcia, J. Mechanism of 6-hydroxydopamine neurotoxicity: The role of NADPH oxidase and microglial activation in 6-hydroxydopamine-induced degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. J. Neurochem. 2007, 103, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hu, Q.; Wang, G. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Transl. Neurodegener. 2016, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Abou-Sleiman, P.M.; Muqit, M.M.; Wood, N.W. Expanding insights of mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, B.; Liu, Q.; Huang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Ma, Q.; Du, M.; Cai, T.; Cai, Y. Extraction of polysaccharide from Spirulina and evaluation of its activities. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jerković, I.; Kranjac, M.; Marijanović, Z.; Šarkanj, B.; Cikoš, A.-M.; Aladić, K.; Pedisić, S.; Jokić, S. Chemical Diversity of Codium bursa (Olivi) C. Agardh Headspace Compounds, Volatiles, Fatty Acids and Insight into Its Antifungal Activity. Molecules 2019, 24, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Erekat, N.S. Apoptosis and its Role in Parkinson’s Disease. Exon Publ. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mohd Sairazi, N.S.; Sirajudeen, K. Natural Products and Their Bioactive Compounds: Neuroprotective Potentials against Neurodegenerative Diseases. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bălașa, A.F.; Chircov, C.; Grumezescu, A.M. Marine Biocompounds for Neuroprotection—A Review. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Cui, W. Marine-derived natural compounds for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Carrera, I.; Cacabelos, R. Current drugs and potential future neuroprotective compounds for Parkinson’s disease. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2019, 17, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xicoy, H.; Wieringa, B.; Martens, G.J. The role of lipids in Parkinson’s disease. Cells 2019, 8, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rodrigues, D.; Alves, C.; Horta, A.; Pinteus, S.; Silva, J.; Culioli, G.; Thomas, O.P.; Pedrosa, R. Antitumor and antimicrobial potential of bromoditerpenes isolated from the red alga, Sphaerococcus coronopifolius. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 713–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rey, F.; Cartaxana, P.; Melo, T.; Calado, R.; Pereira, R.; Abreu, H.; Domingues, P.; Cruz, S.; Domingues, M.R. Domesticated populations of Codium tomentosum display lipid extracts with lower seasonal shifts than conspecifics from the wild—relevance for biotechnological applications of this green seaweed. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. da Costa, E.; Melo, T.; Moreira, A.S.; Alves, E.; Domingues, P.; Calado, R.; Abreu, M.H.; Domingues, M.R. Decoding bioactive polar lipid profile of the macroalgae Codium tomentosum from a sustainable IMTA system using a lipidomic approach. Algal Res. 2015, 12, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lopes, G.; Sousa, C.; Bernardo, J.; Andrade, P.B.; Valentão, P.; Ferreres, F.; Mouga, T. Sterol profiles in 18 macroalgae of the portuguese coast. J. Phycol. 2011, 47, 1210–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, D.; Xiao, J.; Zhou, N.; Zheng, M.; Luo, X.; Jiang, H.; Chen, K. A genetic algorithm based support vector machine model for blood-brain barrier penetration prediction. BioMed Res. Int. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Akhtar, A.; Andleeb, A.; Waris, T.S.; Bazzar, M.; Moradi, A.-R.; Awan, N.R.; Yar, M. Neurodegenerative diseases and effective drug delivery: A review of challenges and novel therapeutics. J. Control. Release 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dávalos, A.; Gómez-Cordovés, C.; Bartolomé, B. Extending applicability of the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC− fluorescein) assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Benzie, I.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ouazia, D.; Levros, L.-C., Jr.; Rassart, E.; Desrosiers, R. Dopamine down-regulation of protein L-isoaspartyl methyltransferase is dependent on reactive oxygen species in SH-SY5Y cells. Neuroscience 2014, 267, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules 25 05478 g001 550
Figure 1. Extraction and fractionation flowchart of the green seaweed Codium tomentosum.
Figure 1. Extraction and fractionation flowchart of the green seaweed Codium tomentosum.
Molecules 25 05478 g001
Molecules 25 05478 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Neurotoxicity of Codium tomentosum fractions (100 µg/mL, 24 h) and (B) neuroprotective effects of non-neurotoxic fractions (100 µg/mL, 24 h) in the presence of 6-OHDA (100 µM) on SH-SY5Y cells. (-) 6-OHDA; Vit E (Vitamin E). The values in each column represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of three or four independent experiments. Symbols represent significant differences (ANOVA, Dunnett’s test, p < 0.05) when compared to: * vehicle and # 6-OHDA.
Figure 2. (A) Neurotoxicity of Codium tomentosum fractions (100 µg/mL, 24 h) and (B) neuroprotective effects of non-neurotoxic fractions (100 µg/mL, 24 h) in the presence of 6-OHDA (100 µM) on SH-SY5Y cells. (-) 6-OHDA; Vit E (Vitamin E). The values in each column represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of three or four independent experiments. Symbols represent significant differences (ANOVA, Dunnett’s test, p < 0.05) when compared to: * vehicle and # 6-OHDA.
Molecules 25 05478 g002
Molecules 25 05478 g003 550
Figure 3. PD hallmarks evaluation on SH-SY5Y cells when exposed to 6-OHDA (100 µM) and Codium tomentosum fractions (100 µg/mL; 6 h). (A) ROS production; (B) changes in mitochondrial membrane potential; (C) Caspase-3 activity. (-) 6-OHDA. The values in each column represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of three or four independent experiments. Symbols represent significant differences (ANOVA, Dunnett’s test, p < 0.05) when compared to: * vehicle and # 6-OHDA.
Figure 3. PD hallmarks evaluation on SH-SY5Y cells when exposed to 6-OHDA (100 µM) and Codium tomentosum fractions (100 µg/mL; 6 h). (A) ROS production; (B) changes in mitochondrial membrane potential; (C) Caspase-3 activity. (-) 6-OHDA. The values in each column represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of three or four independent experiments. Symbols represent significant differences (ANOVA, Dunnett’s test, p < 0.05) when compared to: * vehicle and # 6-OHDA.
Molecules 25 05478 g003
Table
Table 1. Fractionation yields, TPC, and antioxidant capacity of Codium tomentosum fractions.
Table 1. Fractionation yields, TPC, and antioxidant capacity of Codium tomentosum fractions.
Crude ExtractFractionYield (%)TPC aDPPH bFRAP cORAC d
MeOHMF10.092.24 ± 0.15>100282.87 ± 14.2799.91 ± 0.57
MF23.293.96 ± 0.26>100288.40 ± 11.4228.92 ± 0.51
MF30.882.58 ± 0.13>100282.99 ± 2.5152.60 ± 1.28
MF40.577.30 ± 0.47>100271.33 ± 7.3474.76 ± 0.48
MF50.654.32 ± 0.30>100273.01 ± 1.8166.32 ± 0.95
MF66.734.38 ± 0.12>100292.73 ± 3.7372.73 ± 1.36
MF716.892.47 ± 0.05>10023.79 ± 8.4598.55 ± 2.28
CH2Cl2DF10.584.18 ± 0.13>10024.40 ± 1.2238.88 ± 0.73
DF21.5210.43 ± 0.40>10067.67 ± 8.0562.06 ± 1.67
DF31.535.51 ± 0.75>100825.73 ± 32.5998.84 ± 6.00
DF41.003.51 ± 0.20>1001008.27 ± 18.18144.15 ± 2.02
DF56.354.30 ± 0.23>100636.21 ± 22.2194.56 ± 1.02
DF613.884.57 ± 0.17>100356.95 ± 3.73165.34 ± 6.42
DF78.585.69 ± 0.16>100582.11 ± 20.81193.85 ± 14.30
BHT-->1002821.50 ± 51.27142.87 ± 8.71
a mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g extract; b radical scavenging activity (EC50 µg/mL); c µM FeSO4/g extract; d µmol trolox equivalents (TE)/g extract. EC50 values were determined for a 95% confidence interval. MeOH—methanol; CH2Cl2—dichloromethane.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, J.; Martins, A.; Alves, C.; Pinteus, S.; Gaspar, H.; Alfonso, A.; Pedrosa, R. Natural Approaches for Neurological Disorders—The Neuroprotective Potential of Codium tomentosum. Molecules 2020, 25, 5478. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25225478

AMA Style

Silva J, Martins A, Alves C, Pinteus S, Gaspar H, Alfonso A, Pedrosa R. Natural Approaches for Neurological Disorders—The Neuroprotective Potential of Codium tomentosum. Molecules. 2020; 25(22):5478. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25225478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Joana, Alice Martins, Celso Alves, Susete Pinteus, Helena Gaspar, Amparo Alfonso, and Rui Pedrosa. 2020. "Natural Approaches for Neurological Disorders—The Neuroprotective Potential of Codium tomentosum" Molecules 25, no. 22: 5478. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25225478

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop