Next Article in Journal
Natural and Biomimetic Antitumor Pyrazoles, A Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Isostructural Inorganic–Organic Piperazine-1,4-diium Chlorido- and Bromidoantimonate(III) Monohydrates: Octahedral Distortions and Hydrogen Bonds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determining High-Intensity Sweeteners in White Spirits Using an Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatograph with a Photo-Diode Array Detector and Charged Aerosol Detector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Chemical/Instrumental Approaches to the Evaluation of Wine Chemistry

CQM—Centro de Química da Madeira, University of Madeira, 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 5 March 2020 / Accepted: 6 March 2020 / Published: 17 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical/Instrumental Approaches to the Evaluation of Wine Chemistry)
Wine is a widely consumed beverage thanks to its unique and pleasant sensory properties. Wine is composed of more than one thousand chemical compounds (e.g., alcohols, esters, acids, terpenoids, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, anthocyanins, minerals, vitamins, among others) resulting from several chemical and biochemical processes [1,2]. Nowadays, microextraction techniques tandem with high-resolution analytical instruments have been applied by wine researchers to expand the knowledge of wine´s chemical composition with the purpose to improve wine quality, support winemaker decisions related to the winemaking process, and guarantee the authenticity and genuineness of wine [3,4,5,6].
As a result, we proposed “Chemical/Instrumental Approaches to the Evaluation of Wine Chemistry” as an interesting topic for a Special Issue in the Molecules journal. This Special Issue aims to update the top-of-the-art extraction procedures (e.g., solid-phase microextraction (SPME)) and analytical tools (e.g., nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)), emphasizing their use as suitable platforms for the establishment of the chemical composition of wine (volatomic profile, antioxidants, phenolic pattern, elemental composition, among others). In addition, information related to wine sensorial properties, contaminants, authenticity, and chemometric tools used for data treatment will be described in this issue. Thus, this Special Issue includes eight publications using different analytical approaches for the evaluation of wine chemistry [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Regarding gas chromatography, Sancho-Galán et al. [11] used gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) to study the use of bee pollen as a flor velum activator in biological aging wines. Moreover, headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS–SPME/GC–qMS) was used by Dang et al. [14] for determining the retention of volatile phenols (putative markers for Brettanomyces and smoke taint off-odors) by cyclodextrin in model wine, as well as by Perestrelo el al. [7] to investigate the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may potentially be responsible for specific descriptors of Madeira wine, providing details about Madeira wine aroma notes at the molecular level.
Related to liquid chromatography, Tarapatskyy et al. [13] used ultra-performance reverse-phase liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) to assess the bioactive compounds in white and red wines enriched with a Primula veris L. In addition, a novel and accurate method based on ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) with a photo-diode array detector (PDA) and charged aerosol detector (CAD) was developed for simultaneously determining nine sweeteners (most authorized for use in China) in white spirits by Ma et al. [8].
Deng et al. [10] used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine the concentration of trace elements in wines and health risk assessment via wine consumption was investigated in 315 wines. In this context, Tamasi et al. [9] used ionic exchange resins and hydrogels for capturing metal ions (Na, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn)) in sweet dessert wines. Moreover, Li et al. [12] used a nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and UV-visible spectroscopy and dynamic light scattering (DLS) to characterize the interactions between grape seed tannin and either a mannoprotein or an arabinogalactan in model wine solutions of different ethanol concentrations.
This Special Issue is accessible through the following link:
As Guest Editors for this Special Issue, we would like to thank all the authors and co-authors for their contributions, all reviewers for their effort in revising the manuscripts, as well as the editorial office of Molecules journal for their generous help in organizing this Special Issue.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tuberoso, C.I.G.; Serreli, G.; Congiu, F.; Montoro, P.; Fenu, M.A. Characterization, phenolic profile, nitrogen compounds and antioxidant activity of Carignano wines. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 58, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, P.; Gao, J.; Qian, M.; Li, H. Characterization of the key aroma compounds in Chinese Syrah wine by gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry and aroma reconstitution studies. Molecules 2017, 22, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pereira, L.; Gomes, S.; Castro, C.; Eiras-Dias, J.E.; Brazão, J.; Graça, A.; Fernandes, J.R.; Martins-Lopes, P. High Resolution Melting (HRM) applied to wine authenticity. Food Chem. 2017, 216, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Epova, E.N.; Bérail, S.; Séby, F.; Vacchina, V.; Bareille, G.; Médina, B.; Sarthou, L.; Donard, O.F.X. Strontium elemental and isotopic signatures of Bordeaux wines for authenticity and geographical origin assessment. Food Chem. 2019, 294, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gougeon, L.; da Costa, G.; Richard, T.; Guyon, F. Wine Authenticity by Quantitative 1H NMR Versus Multitechnique Analysis: A Case Study. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 956–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kokkinofta, R.; Fotakis, C.; Zervou, M.; Zoumpoulakis, P.; Savvidou, C.; Poulli, K.; Louka, C.; Economidou, N.; Tzioni, E.; Damianou, K.; et al. Isotopic and elemental authenticity markers: A case study on Cypriot wines. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 3902–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Perestrelo, R.; Silva, C.; Câmara, J.S. Madeira wine volatile profile. A platform to establish madeira wine aroma descriptors. Molecules 2019, 24, 3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Ma, K.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, F. Determining high-intensity sweeteners in white spirits using an ultrahigh performance liquid chromatograph with a photo-diode array detector and charged aerosol detector. Molecules 2020, 25, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Tamasi, G.; Pardini, A.; Bonechi, C.; Donati, A.; Casolaro, M.; Leone, G.; Consumi, M.; Cini, R.; Magnani, A.; Rossi, C. Ionic exchange resins and hydrogels for capturing metal ions in selected sweet dessert wines. Molecules 2018, 23, 2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Deng, Z.H.; Zhang, A.; Yang, Z.W.; Zhong, Y.L.; Mu, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.X.; Zhang, J.J.; Fang, Y.L. A human health risk assessment of trace elements present in Chinese wine. Molecules 2019, 24, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Sancho-Galán, P.; Amores-Arrocha, A.; Jiménez-Cantizano, A.; Palacios, V. Use of multiflora bee pollen as a flor velum yeast growth activator in biological aging wines. Molecules 2019, 24, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Li, S.; Wilkinson, K.L.; Mierczynska-Vasilev, A.; Bindon, K.A. Applying nanoparticle tracking analysis to characterize the polydispersity of aggregates resulting from tannin–polysaccharide interactions in wine-like media. Molecules 2019, 24, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Tarapatskyy, M.; Kapusta, I.; Gumienna, A.; Puchalski, C. Assessment of the bioactive compounds in white and red wines enriched with a primula veris L. Molecules 2019, 24, 4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Dang, C.; Wilkinson, K.L.; Jiranek, V.; Taylor, D.K. Development and evaluation of a HS-SPME GC-MS method for determining the retention of volatile phenols by cyclodextrin in model wine. Molecules 2019, 24, 3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Perestrelo, R.; Câmara, J.S. Chemical/Instrumental Approaches to the Evaluation of Wine Chemistry. Molecules 2020, 25, 1363. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25061363

AMA Style

Perestrelo R, Câmara JS. Chemical/Instrumental Approaches to the Evaluation of Wine Chemistry. Molecules. 2020; 25(6):1363. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25061363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perestrelo, Rosa, and José S. Câmara. 2020. "Chemical/Instrumental Approaches to the Evaluation of Wine Chemistry" Molecules 25, no. 6: 1363. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25061363

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop