Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Potential Protein Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
A Themed Issue in Honor of Professor K. Hüsnü Can Baser—Outstanding Contributions in the Fields of Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry, Botany and Ethnopharmacology
Previous Article in Journal
Reprocessable Photodeformable Azobenzene Polymers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dihydroisocoumarins, Naphthalenes, and Further Polyketides from Aloe vera and A. plicatilis: Isolation, Identification and Their 5-LOX/COX-1 Inhibiting Potency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

(E)-2,6,10-Trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol: An Undescribed Sesquiterpenoid from Copaiba Oil

1
Department of BioMolecular Sciences, Division of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 4545, Saudi Arabia
3
National Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA
4
Natural Products Utilization Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, University, MS 38677, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 14 May 2021 / Revised: 15 July 2021 / Accepted: 19 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021

Abstract

:
The use of copaiba oil has been reported since the 16th century in Amazon traditional medicine, especially as an anti-inflammatory ingredient and for wound healing. The use of copaiba oil continues today, and it is sold in various parts of the world, including the United States. Copaiba oil contains mainly sesquiterpenes, bioactive compounds that are popular for their positive effect on human health. As part of our ongoing research endeavors to identify the chemical constituents of broadly consumed herbal supplements or their adulterants, copaiba oil was investigated. In this regard, copaiba oil was subjected to repeated silica gel column chromatography to purify the compounds. As a result, one new and seven known sesquiterpenes/sesquiterpenoids were isolated and identified from the copaiba oil. The new compound was elucidated as (E)-2,6,10-trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol. Structure elucidation was achieved by 1D- and 2D NMR and GC/Q-ToF mass spectral data analyses. The isolated chemical constituents in this study could be used as chemical markers to evaluate the safety or quality of copaiba oil.

1. Introduction

European settlers reported that the people of the Brazilian Amazon region used copaiba trees to treat their wounds [1]. Marcgraf and Piso were the first to describe the copaiba tree in 1638 [2]. Amazonians use copaiba oil resin as an anti-inflammatory and healing agent [3]. Copaiba oil is obtained by tapping the trunk of the Copaifera tree. Copaiba oil can be obtained from several species of Copaifera trees, but Copaifera reticulata is responsible for 70% of oil production [4,5]. Copaifera trees belong to the family Fabaceae (Leguminosae) [4]. Copaifera trees range from 0.5 to 5 m in diameter and up to 60 m in height, and can live up to 400 years [4]. Copaiba oil is an exudate secretion that results from the trees’ detoxification process. The secretion acts as a defensive mechanism against ordinary predators, such as fungi and bacteria [6]. South America, particularly Brazil, has diverse Copaifera species and is considered the largest global exporter of copaiba oil.
Copaiba oil has been used in folk medicine for centuries as a wound-healing agent [7]. This use was likely inspired by animals, as the indigenous people observed injured animals rubbing their bodies on the stem of Copaifera trees [4]. The indigenous people of the Amazon region also used the Copaifera tree to treat several other conditions, such as urinary tract infections, sore throats, stomach ulcers, and infectious diseases. Copaifera trees play a vital role as an alternative remedy in the Amazon region of Brazil, and it is no surprise that phytotherapeutic and cosmetic products using copaiba oil have found their way not only into the Brazilian market but also to the international markets [1]. The main chemical constituent of copaiba oil is β-caryophyllene, which can be found in various essential oils [8]. The chemical profile of copaiba oil might be slightly different from one species to another, but in general, the main constituents are β-caryophyllene, α-humulene, α-copaene, α-bergamotene, δ-cadiene, and β-bisabolol. Some copaiba oils contain diterpene acids, such as copalic acid, clorechinic acid, and hardwickiic acid [4]. However, several factors might cause chemical composition variation in copaiba oil, such as seasonal and climatic characteristics of the environment, soil type, and composition, rainfall index, and species genetics [4,5]. In this study, copaiba oil was investigated as part of a continuing effort to isolate and identify chemical markers for use in quality studies of dietary supplements and botanical drug products under development in the United States. In this regard, eight sesquiterpenes/sesquiterpenoids (Figure 1), including one new, were isolated and characterized by analyzing their 1D and 2D NMR and GC/Q-ToF mass data.

2. Results and Discussion

Copaiba oil was fractionated via silica gel column chromatography into three fractions. Compounds 2–4 were obtained from fraction A and 5–8 were purified from fraction B. Due to the limited amount and complexity of fraction C, only one compound (1) could be isolated from it. Compound 1 was obtained as a colorless oil. Its molecular formula, C15H30O, was established based on the [M-H2O]+ peak at m/z 208.2188 (calcd for C15H28, m/z 208.2191) in the GC/Q-ToF MS. The IR spectrum of 1 showed characteristic bands for alkene (1709 cm−1) and hydroxyl groups (3400 cm−1). The 13C NMR spectrum of 1 revealed 15 signals corresponded to five methyl groups, two olefinic methines, two aliphatic methines, five methylenes, and an oxygenated non-protonated carbon. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 displayed a singlet of six protons at 1.21 ppm assignable to two tertiary methyl groups (H3-1 and H3-13), a triplet (J = 7.4 Hz) of three protons at 0.84 ppm typical for a primary methyl group (H3-12), and two characteristic doublets of three protons each (J = 6.6 Hz and J = 6.8 Hz) at 0.86 ppm and 0.95 ppm for secondary methyl groups (H3-14 and H3-15). A trans double inferred from two typical olefin resonances at δH 5.24 (dd, J = 15.4, 7.5 Hz) and 5.32 (dt, J = 15.4, 7.5). The proton resonances were connected to their respective carbons with the help of HSQC spectrum (Table 1). The locations of the hydroxy and two tertiary methyl groups at C-2 were supported by the HMBC correlations of methyl protons (δH 1.20) with C-2 (δC 71.23) and C-3 (δC 44.41). Similarly, the positions of other methyl groups, double bond, methylenes, and methines were confirmed by the HMBC correlations and 1H-1H COSY couplings (Figure 2). Due to the acyclic nature of the molecule, the absolute configurations at C-6 and C-10 could not be determined. The 1H and 13C NMR data assignments were carried out by COSY, HSQC, and HMBC NMR data analyses, and compound 1 was ultimately elucidated as a sesquiterpenoid named (E)-2, 6, 10-trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol. To the best of our knowledge, compound 1 was found to be a new molecule based on a SciFinder database search.
Previously described compounds (Figure 1) were identified via their 1D and 2D NMR and mass data analyses, which were in agreement with those reported in the literature, as β-caryophyllene (2) [9], α-humulene (3) [10], caryophyllene oxide (4) [11], malliol (5) [12], T-cadinol (6) [13], T-muurolol (7) [14] and torreyol (8) [15]. GC/MS analysis of the investigated copaiba oil showed the following percent composition of the aforementioned compounds: 0.01% (E)-2,6,10-trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol (1), 38.58% β-caryophyllene (2), 6.26% α-humulene (3), 0.02% caryophyllene oxide (4), 0.04% malliol (5), 0.12% T-cadinol (6), 0.16% T-muurolol (7), and 0.12% torreyol (8) (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). Quantitative analysis was determined as the peak area percentage utilizing the total ion chromatogram (TIC).
Several biological activities have been reported for the isolated compounds. β-caryophyllene (2) has been associated with numerous biological activities, such as anticarcinogenic, antibiotic, and anti-inflammatory [16]. Anti-inflammatory properties of α-humulene (3) have also been evaluated [17], revealing that oral administration of α-humulene (3) produces significant inhibitory effects in multiple mouse and rat models. Caryophyllene oxide (4) exhibited anti-inflammatory, analgesic [18], and antifungal activities [19]. Essential oil from P. cylindraceus containg 42% maaliol (5) demonstrated significant cytotoxic activity against three cancerous cell lines (Hela, HepG2, and HT-29) [20]. T-cadinol (6) produced smooth-muscle relaxant effects on isolated guinea pig ileum, depending on the dosage [21]. T-Muurolol (7) showed remarkable antifungal and antitermitic activity [22]. Torreyol (8) revealed antiproliferative and cytotoxic activities [23].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Procedures

NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker AU III 500 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and chemical shifts were referenced to the residual solvent signals. IR spectrum was carried out on Agilent Technologies Cary 630 FTIR (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). GC/Q-ToF mass data were recorded on an Agilent 7890 GC and the Agilent 7250 Accurate-Mass Quadrupole Time-of-Flight mass spectrometer equipped with an electron ionization source operated with an electron energy of 70 eV. The data were acquired utilizing Agilent MassHunter software (version B7.06.274). Flash silica gel (32–63µ, Dynamic Adsorbents Inc, Norcross, GA, USA) was used as an adsorbent in column chromatography (CC). TLC was performed on silica gel F254 aluminum sheet (20 × 20 cm) (Sorbent Tech., Norcross, GA, USA). Spots were visualized on TLC by spraying with 0.5% vanillin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution in conc. H2SO4–EtOH (5:95) followed by heating. Analytical grade solvents (Fisher Chemicals, Hampton, NH, USA) were used for purification.

3.2. Plant Material

The copaiba oil obtained from Copaifera officinalis L. was provided by doTERRA (Pleasant Grove, UT, USA). A reference sample # 613 was deposited in the product repository at the National Center for Natural Products Research (NCNPR), University of Mississippi.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The oil (13.3 g) was subjected to column chromatography (CC) over silica gel (105 cm × 5 cm) using a stepwise gradient concentration of solvents system starting with 100% hexanes (3 L) followed by increasing polarity with ethyl acetate till 30% ethyl acetate was reached (10% ethyl acetate (1.5 L), 10% ethyl acetate (1.5 L), and 10% ethyl acetate (1 L)). Based on TLC profile, the resulting fractions were merged into three collective fractions (A, B, and C). Fraction A (8.5 g) was applied to CC over silica gel (105 cm × 4 cm) using hexanes/ethyl acetate (100:0 (1.5 L), 97:3 (1 L), and 95:5 (1 L)) to yield 23 fractions (A1-A23). β-Caryophyllene (2, 700 mg) from Fr. A6, α-humulene (3, 12 mg) from Fr. A10, and caryophyllene oxide (4, 13.5 mg) from Fr. A15 were purified by CC over silica gel (85 cm × 3 cm) using mixtures of hexanes/ethyl acetate (98:2 (1.5 L), 97:3 (1.5 L), and 90:10 (1.5 L), respectively). Fraction B (2 g) was chromatographed over silica gel (75 cm × 3 cm) using a mixture of hexanes/ethyl acetate (90:10 (2 L)) to yield six fractions (B1-B6). T-Cadinol (6, 10.5 mg) from Fr. B1, T-muurolol (7, 14.4 mg) from Fr. B2, and torreyol (8, 9.4 mg) from Fr. B3 were obtained by CC over silica gel (75 cm × 2 cm) using a mixture of hexanes/ethyl acetate (90:10, (500 mL)). Fraction B4 was subjected to CC on silica gel (65 cm × 2 cm) using hexanes/ethyl acetate (80:20 (400 mL)) mixture to yield maaliol (5, 2.5 mg). Compound 1 (2.9 mg) was obtained from Fr. C (215 mg) by CC over silica gel (72 cm × 2 cm) with hexanes/ethyl acetate (70:30 (500 mL)) mixture.

3.4. Spectral Data

(E)-2, 6, 10-trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol (1). Colorless oil. [α]23D 66 (c 0.16, CHCl3). IR νmax cm−1: 3400, 2924, 2855, 1709, 1469, 1377, 1153, 971, 907. NMR data: see Table 1. GC/Q-ToF-MS: m/z 208.2188 [M-H2O]+ (calcd for C15H28, m/z 208.2191), 179.1794 [C13H23]+, 123.1168 [C9H15]+, 109.1012 [C8H13]+, 95.0855 [C7H11]+, 81.0699 [C6H9]+, 69.0699 [C5H9]+, 67.0542 [C5H7]+, 55.0542 [C4H7]+, m/z 41.0386 [C3H5]+.

3.5. GC/MS Analysis

For a general analysis of copaiba samples, an Agilent 7890 GC equipped with a 7693 autosampler and an Agilent 5975C quadrupole mass spectrometer was used. Separation was achieved with an Agilent DB-5MS Ultra Inert column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm). The inlet was held at 260 °C and was operated in the split mode with a split ratio of 50:1 and an injection volume of 1uL. The initial GC oven temperature was 80 °C; it was then heated at 3 °C/min to 125 °C, then ramped at 1 °C/min to 140 °C and held for 10 min, then heated at 3 °C/min to 170 °C, before a final ramp of 8 °C/min to 280 °C held for 10 min was used. The mass spectrometer was equipped with an electron ionization source, which was operated with an electron energy of 70 eV. The ion source, quadrupole, and transfer line temperatures were set to 230, 150, and 280 °C. Mass spectra data were recorded from 35 to 500 m/z after a 5 min solvent delay. Data were acquired utilizing Agilent MassHunter software (version B7.06.274). All of the copaiba samples were diluted in dichloromethane (0.01%, v/v), and n-dodecane (IS) was added to each sample solution at a constant concentration of 300 µg/mL.
In order to obtain the accurate mass of compound 1, analysis was performed utilizing an Agilent 7890B gas chromatographic (GC) instrument which was equipped with a RS185 PAL3 autosampler. The GC was connected to an Agilent 7250 Accurate-Mass Quadrupole Time-of-Flight (Q-ToF) mass spectrometer. The capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d.) utilized was coated with a 5% Phenyl Methyl Siloxane (J&W HP-5MS) film (0.25 µm). Helium at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min was used as the carrier gas. The following GC oven program was utilized: 50 °C held for 1 min and then heated at a rate of 6 °C/min to 260 °C. The inlet was programmed at 260 °C in split mode. A split ratio of 50:1 with an injection volume of 0.2 uL was used for compound 1. The Q-ToF mass spectrometer was equipped with a high-emission low-energy electron ionization source which was operated with an electron energy of 70 eV and an emission current of 5.0 µA. The source, quadrupole, and transfer line temperatures were 230 °C, 150 °C, and 260 °C, respectively, during the experiment. All mass spectra data were recorded at a rate of 5 Hz from 35 to 450 m/z after a 4 min solvent delay. Data were acquired utilizing Agilent MassHunter software (version B7.06.274).

4. Conclusions

In this study, eight compounds were isolated from the copaiba oil. All compounds were characterized as sesquiterpenes/sesquiterpenoids. Out of them, (E)-2,6,10-trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol (1) was found to be previously undescribed. Possible contribution of the new compound (1) to the biological activity of copaiba oil will have to be investigated in further studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: GC/MS total ion chromatogram of investigated copaiba oil, Figure S2: 1H NMR spectrum of 1, Figure S3: 13C NMR spectrum of 1, Figure S4: COSY spectrum of 1, Figure S5: HSQC spectrum of 1, Figure S6: HMBC spectrum of 1, Figure S7: IR spectrum of 1, Figure S8: GC/Q-ToF mass spectrum of 1, Figure S9: Tentative mass fragmentation associated with 1 are available online.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.A.K.; methodology, Z.A.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, M.F.H. and Z.A.; data curation, M.F.H. and Z.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.A. and O.I.F.; supervision, I.A.K.; project administration, M.W., J.Z. and Z.A.; funding acquisition, M.W., J.Z. and Z.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Specific Cooperative Agreement (No. 58-6060-6-015) and doTERRA International, Research Agreement.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Specific Cooperative Agreement (No. 58-6060-6-015) and doTERRA International for financial support. Mohammed and Omer extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research and the Research Center, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sachetti, C.G.; de Carvalho, R.R.; Paumgartten, F.J.R.; Lameira, O.A.; Caldas, E.D. Developmental toxicity of copaiba tree (Copaifera reticulata Ducke, Fabaceae) oleoresin in rat. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 1080–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Comar, J.F.; Babeto de Sá-Nakanishi, A.; de Oliveira, A.L.; Marques Nogueira Wendt, M.; Bersani Amado, C.A.; Ishii Iwamoto, E.L.; Peralta, R.M.; Bracht, A. Oxidative state of the liver of rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 58, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Teixeira, F.B.; de Brito Silva, R.; Lameira, O.A.; Webber, L.P.; D’Almeida Couto, R.S.; Martins, M.D.; Lima, R.R. Copaiba oil-resin (Copaifera reticulata Ducke) modulates the inflammation in a model of injury to rats’ tongues. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Da Trindade, R.; da Silva, J.K.; Setzer, W.N. Copaifera of the Neotropics: A review of the phytochemistry and pharmacology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Veiga Junior, V.F.; Rosas, E.C.; Carvalho, M.V.; Henriques, M.G.; Pinto, A.C. Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory activity of copaiba oils from Copaifera cearensis Huber ex Ducke, Copaifera reticulata Ducke and Copaifera multijuga Hayne-a comparative study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 112, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Da Silva, A.G.; Puziol Pde, F.; Leitao, R.N.; Gomes, T.R.; Scherer, R.; Martins, M.L.; Cavalcanti, A.S.; Cavalcanti, L.C. Application of the essential oil from copaiba (Copaifera langsdori Desf.) for acne vulgaris: A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Altern. Med. Rev. 2012, 17, 69–75. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arruda, C.; Aldana Mejía, J.A.; Ribeiro, V.P.; Gambeta Borges, C.H.; Martins, C.H.G.; Sola Veneziani, R.C.; Ambrósio, S.R.; Bastos, J.K. Occurrence, chemical composition, biological activities and analytical methods on Copaifera genus-a review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 109, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ames-Sibin, A.P.; Barizão, C.L.; Castro-Ghizoni, C.V.; Silva, F.M.S.; Sá-Nakanishi, A.B.; Bracht, L.; Bersani-Amado, C.A.; Marçal-Natali, M.R.; Bracht, A.; Comar, J.F. β-Caryophyllene, the major constituent of copaiba oil, reduces systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in arthritic rats. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 119, 10262–10277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Larionov, O.V.; Corey, E.J. An unconventional approach to the enantioselective synthesis of caryophylloids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2954–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. McMurry, J.E.; Matz, J.R.; Kees, K.L. Synthesis of macrocyclic terpenoids by intramolecular carbonyl coupling: Flexibilene and humulene. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 5489–5498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reina, M.; Nold, M.; Santana, O.; Orihuela, J.C.; González-Coloma, A. C-5-substituted antifeedant silphinene sesquiterpenes from senecio palmensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gijsen, H.J.M.; Wijnberg, J.B.P.A.; van Ravenswaay, C.; de Groot, A. Rearrangement reactions of aromadendrane derivatives. The synthesis of (+)-maaliol, starting from natural (+)-aromadendrene-IV. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 4733–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Labbe, C.; Castillo, M.; Connolly, J.D. Mono and sesquiterpenoids from Satureja gilliesii. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ding, L.; Pfoh, R.; Rühl, S.; Qin, S.; Laatsch, H. T-Muurolol sesquiterpenes from the marine Streptomyces sp. M491 and revision of the configuration of previously reported amorphanes. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 99–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Van Eijk, G.W.; Roeijmans, H.J.; Verwiel, P.E.n.J. Isolation and identification of the sesquiterpenoid (+)-torreyol from Xylobolus frustulatus. Exp. Mycol. 1984, 8, 273–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Legault, J.; Pichette, A. Potentiating effect of β-caryophyllene on anticancer activity of α-humulene, isocaryophyllene and paclitaxel. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2007, 59, 1643–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fernandes, E.S.; Passos, G.F.; Medeiros, R.; da Cunha, F.M.; Ferreira, J.; Campos, M.M.; Pianowski, L.F.; Calixto, J.B. Anti-inflammatory effects of compounds alpha-humulene and (−)-trans-caryophyllene isolated from the essential oil of Cordia verbenacea. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 569, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chavan, M.J.; Wakte, P.S.; Shinde, D.B. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of caryophyllene oxide from Annona squamosa L. bark. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, D.; Michel, L.; Chaumont, J.-P.; Millet-Clerc, J. Use of caryophyllene oxide as an antifungal agent in an in vitro experimental model of onychomycosis. Mycopathologia 2000, 148, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mothana, R.A.; Khaled, J.M.; Noman, O.M.; Kumar, A.; Alajmi, M.F.; Al-Rehaily, A.J.; Kurkcuoglu, M. Phytochemical analysis and evaluation of the cytotoxic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of essential oils from three Plectranthus species grown in Saudi Arabia. BMC Complement. Alt. Med. 2018, 18, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Claeson, P.; Andersson, R.; Samuelsson, G. T-cadinol: A pharmacologically active constituent of scented myrrh: Introductory pharmacological characterization and high field 1H- and 13C-NMR data. Planta Med. 1991, 57, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cheng, S.-S.; Wu, C.-L.; Chang, H.-T.; Kao, Y.-T.; Chang, S.-T. Antitermitic and antifungal activities of essential oil of Calocedrus formosana leaf and its composition. J. Chem. Ecol. 2004, 30, 1957–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yap, H.-Y.Y.; Muria-Gonzalez, M.J.; Kong, B.-H.; Stubbs, K.A.; Tan, C.-S.; Ng, S.-T.; Tan, N.-H.; Solomon, P.S.; Fung, S.-Y.; Chooi, Y.-H. Heterologous expression of cytotoxic sesquiterpenoids from the medicinal mushroom Lignosus rhinocerotis in yeast. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the isolated compounds.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the isolated compounds.
Molecules 26 04456 g001
Figure 2. COSY couplings and key HMBC correlations of compound 1.
Figure 2. COSY couplings and key HMBC correlations of compound 1.
Molecules 26 04456 g002
Table 1. 13C NMR (125 MHz) and 1H NMR (500 MHz) spectral data of 1 in CDCl3.
Table 1. 13C NMR (125 MHz) and 1H NMR (500 MHz) spectral data of 1 in CDCl3.
NoδCδH, mult. (J in Hz)
129.371.21, s
271.23-
344.411.40, m
1.45, m
421.961.32, m
1.38, m
537.191.11, m
1.31, m
633.341.45, m
740.231.82, dt (14.0, 7.5)
2.00, dt (14.0, 7.5)
8127.105.32, dt (15.4, 7.5)
9
10
137.74
38.69
5.24, dd (15.4, 7.5)
1.96, m
1130.051.26, m
1.29, m
1211.970.84, t (7.4)
1329.421.21, s
1419.620.86, d (6.6)
1520.730.95, d (6.8)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hawwal, M.F.; Ali, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhao, J.; Lee, J.; Fantoukh, O.I.; Khan, I.A. (E)-2,6,10-Trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol: An Undescribed Sesquiterpenoid from Copaiba Oil. Molecules 2021, 26, 4456. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26154456

AMA Style

Hawwal MF, Ali Z, Wang M, Zhao J, Lee J, Fantoukh OI, Khan IA. (E)-2,6,10-Trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol: An Undescribed Sesquiterpenoid from Copaiba Oil. Molecules. 2021; 26(15):4456. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26154456

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hawwal, Mohammed F., Zulfiqar Ali, Mei Wang, Jianping Zhao, Joseph Lee, Omer I. Fantoukh, and Ikhlas A. Khan. 2021. "(E)-2,6,10-Trimethyldodec-8-en-2-ol: An Undescribed Sesquiterpenoid from Copaiba Oil" Molecules 26, no. 15: 4456. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26154456

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop