Next Article in Journal
Mammalian Arginase Inhibitory Activity of Methanolic Extracts and Isolated Compounds from Cyperus Species
Previous Article in Journal
Pyrrole–Aminopyrimidine Ensembles: Cycloaddition of Guanidine to Acylethynylpyrroles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules26061693
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photocatalytic Activities of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) Composites toward the Cycloaddition of CO2 to Propylene Oxide

by
Salwa Hussein Ahmed
,
Maram Bakiro
and
Ahmed Alzamly
*
Department of Chemistry, UAE University, Al-Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(6), 1693; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26061693
Submission received: 2 March 2021 / Revised: 13 March 2021 / Accepted: 15 March 2021 / Published: 17 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Photochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photocatalytic utilization of CO2 in the production of value-added chemicals has presented a recent green alternative for CO2 fixation. In this regard, three FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites of different mole ratios were synthesized, characterized using Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-Vis DRS), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX). PXRD patterns confirm the co-existence of the parent components in the prepared composites. Moreover, the surface area increased as the mole percent of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) in the composites increased due to the large surface area of NH2-MIL-125(Ti). Prepared composites were investigated for the photocatalytic insertion of CO2 into propylene oxide. FeNbO4(75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(25%) showed the highest percent yield of 52% compared to the other two composites. Results demonstrate the cooperative mechanism between FeNbO4 and NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and that the reaction proceeded photocatalytically.

1. Introduction

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are microporous solid materials that have been developed over the last two decades. Constructed form inorganic nodes and multifunctional organic linkers, MOFs have outstanding potential applications in many fields due to their tremendously high surface area [1,2], tunable pore/channels size [3,4], gas adsorption capabilities [5,6] and storage capacity [7,8]. Among targeted applications, MOFs have interesting photocatalytic activities such as the photodegradation of various pollutants [9], water splitting [10], photoreduction of CO2 [11] and the photocatalytic production of value-added chemicals [12]. Particularly, MIL-125(Ti) has exhibited remarkable light harnessing capabilities that can trigger photocatalytic chemical reactions [13]. Nonetheless, MIL-125(Ti) has a large band gap value of 3.57 eV [14] which allows it to utilize light in the UV region [15]. Therefore, many methods were implemented to narrow its band gap to allow it to be utilized in the visible region. Such methods include introducing an amine functionality to the MOF linkers connecting the nodes [16]. NH2-MIL-125(Ti) possesses an optical band gap of 2.72 eV, where the presence of the amine functionality on the benzene ring of the linker donates electrons from its 2p orbital causing a red shift above the VB edge of MIL-125(Ti) [14]. Fu et al. investigated the first photoreduction of carbon dioxide to formate facilitated by visible light illumination using NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and triethanolamine as an electron donor [16]. Furthermore, Horiuchi et al. reported photocatalytic hydrogen production using NH2-MIL-125(Ti) in presence of the Pt nanoparticles co-catalyst under irradiation of visible light [17]. Additionally, Abdelhameed et al. investigated the post-synthetic modification of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) with Cr(III) and Ag nanoparticles for the removal of methylene blue (MB) under simulated day light exposure [18].
Metal and mixed metal oxides have relatively low surface areas, therefore the construction of MOF/mixed metal oxide composites provide composites with a higher surface area, while allowing each component to maintain its own integrity, contributing its characteristics to the new composite [19]. In this regard, Zhu et al. synthesized a BiOBr/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composite and used it for the photocatalytic decomposition of rhodamine B (RhB) dye [20]. The composite showed a higher surface area compared to pure BiOBr and higher photocatalytic activity which was attributed to the transfer of the electron from Ti4+ to Ti3+ and the synergistic effect between BiOBr and the NH2-MIL-125(Ti) [20]. Likewise, Hu et al. reported the synthesis of BiOCl/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composite which exhibited a large surface area allowing for more adsorption of contaminants such as tetracycline hydrochloride (TC), bisphenol A (BPA) and other reactive species [21]. Consequently, the composite showed improved photocatalytic activity towards the removal of TC and BPA. Likewise, superior photodegradation of methylene blue (MB) was demonstrated for the prepared series of BiOI/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites under visible light irradiation studied by Han and co-workers [22]. Recently, a BiNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composite was prepared and used for the photocatalytic cycloaddition of CO2 to propylene oxide. The BiNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(50:50) hybrid exhibited the highest conversion rate of 74% compared to pure BiNbO4 and NH2-MIL-125 [23]. In addition, Abdelhameed et al. further tuned the NH2-MIL-125(Ti) band gap by constructing a Ag3PO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) heterojunction composite [18]. The prepared Ag3PO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composite showed an optical band gap shift of 2.39 eV which is noticeably smaller compared to that of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (2.51 eV). The prepared composite showed higher photocatalytic activity for the removal of MB and RhB under visible light irradiation [18].
Iron niobate, FeNbO4, was investigated for a variety of applications including sensing [24], catalysis [25], and as photoanode material [26]. Nonetheless, limited research was conducted on the photocatalytic behavior of FeNbO4. Cho et al. investigated the photocatalytic removal of RhB dye using a narrow band gap FeNbO4 photocatalyst [27]. The hydrothermally prepared photocatalyst exhibited higher photocatalytic activity under tungsten halogen lamp irradiation which attributed to smaller particle size and fewer surface defects. Zhang et al. prepared FeNbO4 through a solid-state method and calcined it at different temperatures and used it for the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO) [28]. At a calcination temperature above 700 °C, pure FeNbO4 was formed, however, below this temperature, FeNb2O6 also formed. FeNbO4 along with the new formed phase of FeNb2O6 showed to increase the activity toward the removal of MO.
FeNbO4 was further investigated by incorporating rGO as a support material to improve the photocatalytic performance due to its high surface area and high electron mobility. Three different mass ratio FeNbO4/rGO composites were prepared for the photocatalytic cycloaddition of CO2 into propylene oxide under visible light irradiation [29]. As indicated, increasing rGO content in the composite increases the photocatalytic performance of the composite, where the FeNbO4-5%rGO composite showed the highest yield percent of 57%. Jones et al. investigated the photocatalytic performance of the FeNbO4/rGO composite for the degradation of norfloxacin under visible light irradiation using a 250 W Xe lamp [30]. The composite exhibited higher activity compared to pure FeNbO4 which is attributed to the ability of rGO to act as electron acceptor reducing the recombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs.
In this report, FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites with different mole ratios of FeNbO4 added were prepared for the first time. Composites were characterized using different analytical techniques: PXRD, UV-Vis DRS, BET, SEM and EDX. Moreover, their photocatalytic performance was evaluated toward the cycloaddition of CO2 to propylene oxide.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Iron (III) nitrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O), Ammonium niobate (V) oxalate (C4H4NNbO9·XH2O), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), barium sulfate (BaSO4), chloroform-d (CDCl3), methylene chloride (CH2Cl2, DCM), dimethylformamide (C3H7NO, DMF), 2-amino benzene dicarboxylic acid (C8H7NO4), titanium isopropoxide (C12H28O4Ti), methanol (CH3OH) tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (C16H36BrN, TBAB), acetonitrile (CH3CN) and propylene oxide (C3H6O, PO) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich and used without purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Pure FeNbO4

Co-precipitation approach was implemented for the synthesis of FeNbO4. In a typical procedure: 0.015 mol of Ferric nitrate nonahydrate in 10 mL of DI water and 0.015 mol of ammonium niobate (V) oxalate was dissolved in 70 mL of DI water. The Ferric solution was then added dropwise to the Nb solution, immediately, the mixture turned yellow. The mixture left under vigorous stirring, and the pH was adjusted to 2 by the addition of NH4OH. Reaction mixture allowed to stir overnight. A water bath was used to evaporate excess solvent. The solid product was then allowed to dry in an oven at 100 ° C. The solid was then calcinated at 1100 ° C for 6 h.

2.3. Synthesis of NH2-MIL-125(Ti)

NH2-MIL-125(Ti) was synthesized by dissolving 1 g (6 mmol) of 2-amino benzene dicarboxylic acid in a mixture of 50 mL DMF and 50 mL methanol. The mixture was placed in a 100 mL sealed tube and 910 μL (3 mmol) of titanium isopropoxide was added, a yellow powder was formed immediately. The sealed tube was heated at 130 ° C for 1 day. The produced powder was filtered and washed with DMF to separate unreacted materials. The product was washed several times with methanol.

2.4. Synthesis of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) Composites

Three different mole ratios of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) were prepared. FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(75%) composite was prepared by the simple mixing of 25 mol% of FeNbO4 and 75 mol% of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) in 5 mL acetone. The other two composites, FeNbO4(50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(50%) and FeNbO4(75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(25%), were prepared following the above-described procedure.

3. Characterization

3.1. Powder X-ray Diffraction Spectroscopy (PXRD)

Powder X-ray diffraction were recorded on Shimadzu-6100 X-ray powder instrument. The X-ray tube voltage was 40 kV, current 30 mA and wavelength λ of 1.542 Å. Samples were scanned within the range 10°–60° at a rate of 2°/min.

3.2. UV-Vis Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

Band gaps were measured using Shimadzu UV-3600 UV-Vis spectrometer operates over a range of 200 nm to 800 nm. Tauc plots method [31] was used for calculating the band gap energies for the prepared photocatalysts. The band gaps were calculated applying Equation (1) where α , h, and v are the absorption coefficient, Planck’s constant and light frequency, respectively. The n value is characteristic of the semiconductor transition (n = 1/2 for direct allowed transition), A is a constant and E g is the measured band gap [32].
α h ν 1 n = A h ν − E g
The band gap energy ( E g ) was calculated by plotting ( α hv ) 2   vs. hv and extrapolating the linear region to the point that the linear line intersects with the hv axis [33].

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX)

Surface morphology and elemental composition were analyzed using a FEI SEM Quattro S scanning electron microscope equipped with EDS-Oxford INCA PENTA runs at 30 KV. Prior to the analysis, each sample was positioned on a sample holder which was covered with a carbon tape followed by an overlay with gold.

3.4. BET Surface Area and Porosity

Quantochrome Autosorb-1 volumetric gas sorption was used for BET surface area and porosity determination, the BET surface area was estimated using a nitrogen adsorption-desorption curve at 77 K. Prior to the analysis, each sample was degassed at 150 °C for 2 h. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory was used to calculate the surface area. Moreover, Barett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) model was adopted in pore size determination.

3.5. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

For product identification, 1H and 13C NMR were recorded on a Varian-400 MHz using chloroform-d as a solvent.

3.6. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)

For functional group identification, ATR-FTIR spectrum was recorded on a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer IR Prestige-21, Shimadzu operates in the range of 500 to 3500 cm−1.

4. Photocatalytic Activity

Photocatalytic activities of prepared composites were evaluated for the cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxide. Reaction mixture contained 100 μL propylene oxide, 1 mL methanol as electron hole scavenger, 4 mL acetonitrile, 9 mg TBAB as co-catalyst, 0.045 moL CO2 and 50 mg of the prepared photocatalyst. The round-bottom flask containing the mixture was kept 10 cm away from the light source (Halogen lamp-500 W) and allowed to stand for 72 h [34]. The reaction then was stopped and the photocatalyst was filtered and product was isolated from TBAB by separation using a mixture of water and DCM. The DCM layer was evaporated, and the product was isolated and characterized using FT-IR, 1HNMR, and 13CNMR.

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. PXRD Analyses of Pure FeNbO4 and FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) Composites

All diffraction peaks of synthesized NH2-MIL-125(Ti) are consistent with the first NH2-MIL-125(Ti) reported by Fu et al. [16]. On the other hand, pure FeNbO4 diffraction pattern is indexed to the monoclinic phase (JCPDS file No.16-0374). Thus, PXRD patterns of prepared FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites display both diffraction peaks of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and FeNbO4, implying an effective incorporation of both components in the newly formed composites. Notably, peak intensity represents the amount of the component present in the composite, e.g., in the FeNbO4(75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(25%) composite, FeNbO4 peaks are more intense compared to NH2-MIL-125(Ti) peaks. Moreover, NH2-MIL-125(Ti) peak intensity increases as the mole ratio of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) increases in the composite as shown in Figure 1. The crystal size shown in Table 1 was calculated using Scherrer equation [35]. As expected, all prepared composites attained the same calculated crystal size of 38.13 nm.

5.2. UV-Vis DRS for Pure FeNbO4 and Composite Photocatalysts

Optical absorptions were obtained for pure FeNbO4, NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and their corresponding composite photocatalysts. Band gaps were calculated using Tauc plot method and are presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3. NH2-MIL-125(Ti) displays the largest band gap of 2.68 eV, same as reported by Wang et al. [36]. Prepared FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites of different mole ratio exhibited a red shift corresponds to a narrower band gap. It was noted that, as FeNbO4 mole percent increases, the calculated band gap decreases as shown in Table 1. Interestingly, FeNbO4(50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(50%) showed the lowest band gap at 2.55 eV.

5.3. N2 Adsorption-Desorption Analyses for Pure FeNbO4 and Composites

Surface area and porosity of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4, and the composite photocatalysts, were analyzed using N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti) exhibited type- IV isotherm characterized by a H3 hysteresis loop observed at a relative pressure range between 0.5 and 1.0 which is associated with capillary condensation indicating the existence of a mesoporous structure. The three different composites displayed type-IV isotherms with a hysteresis loop as that of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti). The calculated surface area for NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4(25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(75%), FeNbO4(50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(50%) and FeNbO4(75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti)(25%) are 1025.71 m2/g, 856.40 m2/g, 820.92 m2/g and 666.13 m2/g, respectively. The surface area of the composites decreased as the mole ratio of FeNbO4 increased which is attributed to the small surface area of the prepared FeNbO4 (Table 1).

5.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX)

Elemental analyses and SEM images of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4 and their composite photocatalysts are presented in Figure 6 and Figure S1. NH2-MIL-125(Ti) shows a mixture of agglomerated spherical and cube-like structure with sharp edges, while FeNbO4 exhibited an agglomerated sphere-like morphology. As displayed in Figure 6c, FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (75%) exhibited a similar morphology to that of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti) with severe agglomeration and less defined edges. Notably, as percent FeNbO4 increases, agglomeration increases, and the morphology increasingly resembles that of pure FeNbO4. Accordingly, SEM images conclude that FeNbO4 is well integrated with NH2-MIL-125(Ti) which can assist in the transmission of the photogenerated electrons throughout the composites.
EDX analyses confirmed the elemental composition of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4, and composite photocatalysts with no extra peaks observed for any impurities present in the sample (Table 2). Elemental mapping shows the distribution of C, N, O, Ti, Fe, and Nb in the samples (Figure S2).

5.5. Photocatalytic Reaction of FeNbO4, NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) Composite Photocatalysts

Selective Propylene carbonate formation was confirmed using 1H and 13C NMR and FT-IR. There were no extra peaks detected for any polymeric products, all peaks in the NMR spectra were assigned to only one product formation, i.e., selective propylene carbonate with the correct ratio of integration (see supporting information Figures S3 and S4). Moreover, the FT-IR graph illustrates the presence of C=O and C−O functional groups (Figure S5).
A low percent yield (12%) was observed for pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti) compared to pure FeNbO4 and their composites. It was proven that the NH2-MIL-125(Ti) photoreaction proceeds via the (LMCT) ligand to metal charge transfer [16]. Upon light irradiation, generated electrons from the linker are transformed to Ti4+ to facilitate its reduction to Ti3+ [37,38] while methanol acts as an electron donor (Figure 7a). Evidently, there are two competing processes involved; the first indicates much of the CO2 molecules were adsorbed into the NH2-MIL-125(Ti), the second involves the formation of a carbon dioxide radical anion which facilitates the cycloaddition to epoxide. Likewise, the FeNbO4 calculated percent yield was low (28%) which can be attributed to the high recombination rate, the mechanism for which is presented in Figure 7b. However, the photocatalytic efficiency was higher for the prepared composites [39,40,41] where a high yield was achieved as the FeNbO4 ratio increased in the composite. This can be related to the ability of FeNbO4 to absorb more visible light and excite more photogenerated electrons. NH2-MIL-125(Ti) serves as a CO2 adsorbent, therefore Ti3+ reduces CO2 to CO2− followed by its addition to propylene oxide activated by TBAB. This electron transfer process suppresses the recombination rate of the generated e− and h+ pairs. Methanol acts as a hole scavenger providing more electrons for the continuous reduction of Ti4+; Figure 8 outlines this mechanism as suggested by Prajapati et al. [42]. The potential of the conduction band (CB) and the valence band (VB) of FeNbO4 were calculated using the following equations [25]:
ECB = 𝜒 − E0 − 0.5Eg
EVB = ECB + Eg
ECB in Equation (2) refers to the potential of the CB in eV. χ is the Mulliken electronegativity geometric mean calculated for the constituent atoms of the semiconductor. E0 is ~4.5 eV which is the free electron on the H2 redox scale and Eg is the band gap. The valence band potential was calculated using Equation (3). FeNbO4 possesses a calculated conduction band potential of 0.64 V (vs. NHE), given that the calculated Eg of FeNbO4 is 1.85 eV as obtained from UV-vis DRS. The valence band potential was calculated to be 2.49 V. In addition, the band potential of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) is −0.59 V and 2.09 V (vs, NHE), respectively. These values were calculated by Wang et al., for NH2-MIL-125(Ti) with Eg = 2.68 eV (the same value was obtained using UV-vis DRS for the prepared NH2-MIL-125(Ti) [36]. A blank experiment was conducted by adding TBAB (entry 6, Table 3) with no photocatalyst under visible light irradiation. The calculated yield was 15% which confirms the photocatalytic nature of this process. Further, reactions were conducted in the dark using synthesized photocatalysts without and with applying heat up to 75 °C. Only FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%) composite photocatalyst showed low activity under these conditions. An insignificant yield was observed when no light and no heat involved (entry 7, Table 3), implying that the reaction is prominently photocatalytic in nature. On the other hand, applying heat to the reaction mixture increased the yield slightly (entry 8, Table 3) which suggests that heat influences the reaction. In fact, carbon dioxide utilization for cycloaddition of epoxides accomplished hydrothermally where temperature and pressure of CO2 have found to play a key role in cyclic carbonate formation [43]. However, this does not rule out that as entries 7 and 8 suggest that the reaction proceeds predominantly photocatalytic. It is worth mentioning that when trying to cycle the photocatalyst after the first run, the photocatalyst dissipates during filtration due to the fine powdery nature of the photocatalyst.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, three composites were successfully prepared and characterized. PXRD patterns of the composites confirm the co-existence of both FeNbO4 and NH2-MIL-125(Ti). NH2-MIL-125(Ti) showed the highest surface area of 1025.71 m2/g, which decreased as the mole ratio of FeNbO4 increased due to the insignificant surface area of FeNbO4. FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites presented higher photocatalytic activity in comparison to the pure FeNbO4 and NH2-MIL-125(Ti), indicating that the formed heterojunction improves the photocatalytic activity of the materials due to synergistic effects between FeNbO4 and NH2-MIL-125(Ti). Variable reaction conditions were implemented to understand the role of the photocatalyst and visible light irradiation. The obtained results underline that the reaction proceeds predominantly photocatalytically.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: EDX for (a) NH2-MIL-125(Ti), (b) FeNbO4, (c) FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (75%), (d) FeNbO4 (50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (50%) and (e) FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%)., Figure S2: SEM elemental mapping of (a) NH2-MIL-125(Ti), (b) FeNbO4, (b) FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (75%), (c) FeNbO4 (50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (50%) and (d) FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%), Figure S3: 1H NMR spectrum for obtained propylene carbonate, Figure S4: 13C NMR spectrum for obtained propylene carbonate, Figure S5: FTIR spectrum for obtained propylene carbonate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H.A. and A.A.; methodology, S.H.A.; software, M.B.; validation, S.H.A.; formal analysis, S.H.A.; investigation, M.B.; resources, A.A.; data curation, S.H.A.; Salwa. H. Ahmed; writing—review and editing, A.A.; visualization, S.H.A.; supervision, A.A.; project administration, A.A.; funding acquisition, A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by United Arab Emirates University, grant number 31R238, A.A.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data of the compounds are available from the authors.

Acknowledgments

This research project was financially supported by the United Arab Emirates University, Emirates Center for Energy and Environment Research, Collaboration Team Research (grant no. 31R238, A.A.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Grünker, R.; Bon, V.; Müller, P.; Stoeck, U.; Krause, S.; Mueller, U.; Senkovska, I.; Kaskel, S. A new metal-organic framework with ultra-high surface area. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 3450–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Farha, O.K.; Eryazici, I.; Jeong, N.C.; Hauser, B.G.; Wilmer, C.E.; Sarjeant, A.A.; Snurr, R.Q.; Nguyen, S.T.; Yazaydin, A.Ö.; Hupp, J.T. Metal-organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: Is the sky the limit? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15016–15021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, B.; Eddaoudi, M.; Hyde, S.T.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Interwoven metal-organic framework on a periodic minimal surface with extra-large pores. Science 2001, 291, 1021–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Qiu, L.; Xu, T.; Li, Z.; Wang, W.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Tian, X.; Zhang, L. Hierarchically micro-and mesoporous metal–organic frameworks with tunable porosity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9487–9491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, B.; Ockwig, N.W.; Millward, A.R.; Contreras, D.S.; Yaghi, O.M. High H2 adsorption in a microporous metal–organic framework with open metal sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4745–4749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhao, X.; Xiao, B.; Fletcher, A.J.; Thomas, K.M.; Bradshaw, D.; Rosseinsky, M.J. Hysteretic adsorption and desorption of hydrogen by nanoporous metal-organic frameworks. Science 2004, 306, 1012–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Millward, A.R.; Yaghi, O.M. Metal—Organic frameworks with exceptionally high capacity for storage of carbon dioxide at room temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17998–17999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rosi, N.L.; Eckert, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Vodak, D.T.; Kim, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks. Science 2003, 300, 1127–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wang, C.-C.; Li, J.-R.; Lv, X.-L.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Guo, G. Photocatalytic organic pollutants degradation in metal–organic frameworks. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2831–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Navarro Amador, R.; Carboni, M.; Meyer, D. Photosensitive titanium and zirconium Metal Organic Frameworks: Current research and future possibilities. Mater. Lett. 2016, 166, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, R.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, K. Metal–Organic-Framework-Based Catalysts for Photoreduction of CO2. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Herbst, A.; Janiak, C. MOF catalysts in biomass upgrading towards value-added fine chemicals. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 4092–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chambers, M.B.; Wang, X.; Ellezam, L.; Ersen, O.; Fontecave, M.; Sanchez, C.; Rozes, L.; Mellot-Draznieks, C. Maximizing the Photocatalytic Activity of Metal-Organic Frameworks with Aminated-Functionalized Linkers: Substoichiometric Effects in MIL-125-NH2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8222–8228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hendon, C.H.; Tiana, D.; Fontecave, M.; Sanchez, C.; D’Arras, L.; Sassoye, C.; Rozes, L.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Walsh, A. Engineering the optical response of the titanium-MIL-125 metal-organic framework through ligand functionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10942–10945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Wang, H.; Yuan, X.; Wu, Y.; Zeng, G.; Dong, H.; Chen, X.; Leng, L.; Wu, Z.; Peng, L. In situ synthesis of In2S3 at MIL-125(Ti) core-shell microparticle for the removal of tetracycline from wastewater by integrated adsorption and visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 186, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fu, Y.; Sun, D.; Chen, Y.; Huang, R.; Ding, Z.; Fu, X.; Li, Z. An amine-functionalized titanium metal-organic framework photocatalyst with visible-light-induced activity for CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3364–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Horiuchi, Y.; Toyao, T.; Saito, M.; Mochizuki, K.; Iwata, M.; Higashimura, H.; Anpo, M.; Matsuoka, M. Visible-light-promoted photocatalytic hydrogen production by using an amino-functionalized Ti(IV) metal-organic framework. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 20848–20853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abdelhameed, R.M.; Tobaldi, D.M.; Karmaoui, M. Engineering highly effective and stable nanocomposite photocatalyst based on NH2-MIL-125 encirclement with Ag3PO4 nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 351, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zheng, S.; Li, Q.; Xue, H.; Pang, H.; Xu, Q. A highly alkaline-stable metal oxide@metal–organic framework composite for high-performance electrochemical energy storage. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhu, S.R.; Liu, P.F.; Wu, M.K.; Zhao, W.N.; Li, G.C.; Tao, K.; Yi, F.Y.; Han, L. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of BiOBr/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composite for dye degradation under visible light. Dalt. Trans. 2016, 45, 17521–17529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hu, Q.; Di, J.; Wang, B.; Ji, M.; Chen, Y.; Xia, J.; Li, H.; Zhao, Y. In-situ preparation of NH2-MIL-125(Ti)/BiOCl composite with accelerating charge carriers for boosting visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 466, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, L.; Zhang, X.; Wu, D. Construction and characterization of BiOI/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) heterostructures with excellent visible-light photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 3773–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bakiro, M.; Ahmed, S.H.; Alzamly, A. Cycloaddition of CO2 to propylene oxide using BiNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites as visible-light photocatalysts. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Henshaw, G.S.; Morris, L.; Gellman, L.J.; Williams, D.E. Selectivity and compositional dependence of response of gas-sensitive resistors part 4—Properties of some rutile solid solution compounds. J. Mater. Chem. 1996, 6, 1883–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Babu, R.; Kelkar, S.; Kashid, V.; Achary, S.N.; Salunke, H.G.; Gupta, N.M. Photophysical, bandstructural, and textural properties of o-FeNbO 4 in relation to its cocatalyst-assisted photoactivity for water oxidation. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 33435–33445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, H.; Kim, Y.K.; Jeong, H.Y.; Lee, J.S. A Few Atomic FeNbO4 Overlayers on Hematite Nanorods: Microwave-Induced High Temperature Phase for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cho, I.S.; Lee, S.; Hong-Noh, J.; Choi, G.K.; Jung, H.S.; Kim, D.W.; Hong, K.S. Visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity in FeNbO4 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 18393–18398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, W.; Sun, X.; Chen, B. Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange on Iron Niobate Prepared by Solid-state Reaction. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 113–116, 2021–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahmed, S.H.; Bakiro, M.; Alzamly, A. Visible-light-driven photocatalytic formation of propylene carbonate using FeNbO4/reduced graphene oxide composites. Materialia 2020, 12, 100781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jones, B.M.F.; Maruthamani, D.; Muthuraj, V. Construction of novel n-type semiconductor anchor on 2D honey comb like FeNbO4/RGO for visible light drive photocatalytic degradation of norfloxacin. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2020, 400, 112712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tauc, J. Absorption edge and internal electric fields in amorphous semiconductors. Mater. Res. Bull. 1970, 5, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ting, C.; Chen, S.; Liu, D.; Ting, C.; Chen, S. Structural evolution and optical properties of TiO2 thin films prepared by thermal oxidation of sputtered Ti films. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 88, 4628–4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Makuła, P.; Pacia, M.; Macyk, W. How to Correctly Determine the Band Gap Energy of Modified Semiconductor Photocatalysts Based on UV–Vis Spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 6814–6817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Rai, R.; George, A.; Sai Muthukumar, V.; Varma, K.B.R.; Philip, R.; Molli, M. Investigation of nonlinear optical and photocatalytic properties of sol–gel derived KBiFe2O5. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 11451–11457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zsigmondy, R.; Scherrer, P. Bestimmung der inneren Struktur und der Größe von Kolloidteilchen mittels Röntgenstrahlen. In Kolloidchemie Ein Lehrbuch; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1912; pp. 387–409. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, M.; Yang, L.; Yuan, J.; He, L.; Song, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, S. Heterostructured Bi2S3@NH2-MIL-125(Ti) nanocomposite as a bifunctional photocatalyst for Cr(vi) reduction and rhodamine B degradation under visible light. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 12459–12470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Cai, T.; Dong, W.; Tang, L.; Xia, X.; Wang, L.; Li, T. Boosting Photocatalytic Performance in Mixed-Valence MIL-53(Fe) by Changing Fe II /Fe III Ratio. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 28791–28800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, H.; Gu, S.; Sun, Z.; Guo, F.; Xie, Y.; Tao, B.; He, X.; Zhang, W.; Chang, H. The in-built bionic “MoFe cofactor” in Fe-doped two-dimensional MoTe 2 nanosheets for boosting the photocatalytic nitrogen reduction performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 13038–13048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kosco, J.; Bidwell, M.; Cha, H.; Martin, T.; Howells, C.T.; Sachs, M.; Anjum, D.H.; Gonzalez Lopez, S.; Zou, L.; Wadsworth, A.; et al. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from organic semiconductor heterojunction nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, X.; Li, W.; Li, H.; Ren, C.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y. Efficient Fe3O4-C3N4-Ag2MoO4 ternary photocatalyst: Synthesis, outstanding light harvesting, and superior hydroxyl radical productivity for boosted photocatalytic performance. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018, 568, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gu, S.; Li, W.; Bian, Y.; Wang, F.; Li, H.; Liu, X. Highly-Visible-Light Photocatalytic Performance Derived from a Lanthanide Self-Redox Cycle in Ln2O3/BiVO4 (Ln: Sm, Eu, Tb) Redox Heterojunction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 19242–19251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Prajapati, P.K.; Kumar, A.; Jain, S.L. First Photocatalytic Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from CO2 and Epoxides Using CoPc/TiO2 Hybrid under Mild Conditions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 7799–7809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Appaturi, J.N.; Ramalingam, R.J.; Gnanamani, M.K.; Periyasami, G.; Arunachalam, P.; Adnan, R.; Adam, F.; Wasmiah, M.D.; Al-Lohedan, H.A. Review on Carbon Dioxide Utilization for Cycloaddition of Epoxides by Ionic Liquid-Modified Hybrid Catalysts: Effect of Influential Parameters and Mechanisms Insight. Catalysts 2021, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 01693 g001 550
Figure 1. PXRD patterns of FeNbO4, NH2-MIL-125(Ti), and FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites.
Figure 1. PXRD patterns of FeNbO4, NH2-MIL-125(Ti), and FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) composites.
Molecules 26 01693 g001
Molecules 26 01693 g002 550
Figure 2. Tauc plot of pure FeNbO4.
Figure 2. Tauc plot of pure FeNbO4.
Molecules 26 01693 g002
Molecules 26 01693 g003 550
Figure 3. Tauc plot of FeNbO4 and NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and the prepared composites.
Figure 3. Tauc plot of FeNbO4 and NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and the prepared composites.
Molecules 26 01693 g003
Molecules 26 01693 g004 550
Figure 4. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of pure FeNbO4.
Figure 4. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of pure FeNbO4.
Molecules 26 01693 g004
Molecules 26 01693 g005 550
Figure 5. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and the three different mole ratio composites of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti).
Figure 5. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of pure NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and the three different mole ratio composites of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti).
Molecules 26 01693 g005
Molecules 26 01693 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) NH2-MIL-125(Ti), (b) FeNbO4, (c) FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (75%), (d) FeNbO4 (50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (50%) and (e) FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%).
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) NH2-MIL-125(Ti), (b) FeNbO4, (c) FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (75%), (d) FeNbO4 (50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (50%) and (e) FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%).
Molecules 26 01693 g006
Molecules 26 01693 g007a 550Molecules 26 01693 g007b 550
Figure 7. Proposed mechanism of (a) NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and (b) FeNbO4 for the photocatalytic addition of CO2 into propylene oxide.
Figure 7. Proposed mechanism of (a) NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and (b) FeNbO4 for the photocatalytic addition of CO2 into propylene oxide.
Molecules 26 01693 g007aMolecules 26 01693 g007b
Molecules 26 01693 g008 550
Figure 8. Proposed mechanism of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) for the photocatalytic addition of CO2 into propylene oxide.
Figure 8. Proposed mechanism of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) for the photocatalytic addition of CO2 into propylene oxide.
Molecules 26 01693 g008
Table
Table 1. Physical properties of NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4 and their composites.
Table 1. Physical properties of NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4 and their composites.
SamplesBand Gap (eV)Crystal Size (nm)BET Surface Area (m2/g)Pore Volume (cm3/g)Pore Diameter (Å)
NH2-MIL-125(Ti)2.6832.261025.710.5722.35
FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (75%)2.6638.13856.400.4922.70
FeNbO4 (50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (50%)2.5538.13820.920.4521.75
FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%)2.6538.13666.130.3722.09
FeNbO41.8549.061.340.001957.81
Table
Table 2. Weight and atomic percentage of NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4 and their composites.
Table 2. Weight and atomic percentage of NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4 and their composites.
SamplesWeight %Atomic %
CNOTiFeNbCN OTiFeNb
NH2-MIL-125(Ti)22.785.5425.8345.86--39.008.1333.1919.68--
FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (75%)30.859.1434.2616.531.367.8544.1611.2236.825.930.421.45
FeNbO4 (50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (50%)20.724.9631.4430.740.4511.6935.797.3540.7713.310.172.61
FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%)35.525.9531.1812.931.2913.1451.307.3633.804.680.402.45
Table
Table 3. Reaction conditions and results of NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4 and their composites (a).
Table 3. Reaction conditions and results of NH2-MIL-125(Ti), FeNbO4 and their composites (a).
EntryPhotocatalystReaction ConditionsYield (%) (b)
1NH2-MIL-125(Ti)visible light12
2FeNbO4 (25%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (75%)visible light39
3FeNbO4 (50%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (50%)visible light30
4FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%)visible light52
5FeNbO4visible light28
6 (c)TBABvisible light15
7FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%)no light2
8FeNbO4 (75%)/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) (25%)heat with no light (d)11
(a) Reaction was conducted using propylene oxide (1.4 mmol), 4 mL CH3CN, 1 mL MeOH as hole scavenger, TBAB (0.028 mmol), 50 mg photocatalyst and 0.045 moL CO2, reaction conducted for 72 h using 500 W visible light halogen lamp. (b) Yield was calculated based on actual yield of product recovered. (c) Reaction run with no photocatalyst. (d) Reaction was conducted at temperature of 75 °C.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hussein Ahmed, S.; Bakiro, M.; Alzamly, A. Photocatalytic Activities of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) Composites toward the Cycloaddition of CO2 to Propylene Oxide. Molecules 2021, 26, 1693. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26061693

AMA Style

Hussein Ahmed S, Bakiro M, Alzamly A. Photocatalytic Activities of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) Composites toward the Cycloaddition of CO2 to Propylene Oxide. Molecules. 2021; 26(6):1693. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26061693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hussein Ahmed, Salwa, Maram Bakiro, and Ahmed Alzamly. 2021. "Photocatalytic Activities of FeNbO4/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) Composites toward the Cycloaddition of CO2 to Propylene Oxide" Molecules 26, no. 6: 1693. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26061693

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop