Next Article in Journal
Antifungal Sesquiterpenoids from Michelia formosana Leaf Essential Oil against Wood-Rotting Fungi
Previous Article in Journal
Research Progress of Natural Small-Molecule Compounds Related to Tumor Differentiation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Organic Electronics from Nature: Computational Investigation of the Electronic and Optical Properties of the Isomers of Bixin and Norbixin Present in the Achiote Seeds

by
Igo Tôrres Lima
1,†,
Josiel da Silva Crispim
2,†,
Olimpio Pereira de Sá Neto
3,4,†,
Rafael Timóteo de Sousa Júnior
5,†,
Luiz Antônio Ribeiro Júnior
6,† and
Demétrio Antonio da Silva Filho
6,*,†
1
Coordenação do Bacharelado Interdisciplinar em Ciência e Tecnologia, Campus Dom Delgado, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química, Universidade Estadual do Piauí, Rua João Cabral 2231, Teresina 64002-150, PI, Brazil
3
Coordenação de Ciência da Computação, Universidade Estadual do Piauí, Parnaiba 65202-220, PI, Brazil
4
Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CP 68.528, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, RJ, Brazil
5
Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70919-970, DF, Brazil
6
Instituto de Física, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília 70919-970, DF, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 24 December 2021 / Revised: 25 February 2022 / Accepted: 21 March 2022 / Published: 25 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Nanomaterials for Sustainable Energy Applications)

Abstract

:
Organic compounds have been employed in developing new green energy solutions with good cost-efficiency compromise, such as photovoltaics. The light-harvesting process in these applications is a crucial feature that still needs improvements. Here, we studied natural dyes to propose an alternative for enhancing the light-harvesting capability of photovoltaics. We performed density functional theory calculations to investigate the electronic and optical properties of the four natural dyes found in achiote seeds (Bixa orellana L.). Different DFT functionals, and basis sets, were used to calculate the electronic and optical properties of the bixin, norbixin, and their trans-isomers (molecules present in Bixa orellana L.). We observed that the planarity of the molecules and their similar extension for the conjugation pathways provide substantially delocalized wavefunctions of the frontier orbitals and similar values for their energies. Our findings also revealed a strong absorption peak in the blue region and an absorption band over the visible spectrum. These results indicate that Bixa orellana L. molecules can be good candidates for improving light-harvesting in photovoltaics.

1. Introduction

Alternatives for silicon-based photovoltaics, such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) [1,2,3], organic photovoltaics [4,5,6], and perovskite solar cells [7], have not yet reached the desired maturity concerning their physicochemical stability and efficiency. A problem that still limits their efficiency is the low light-harvesting capability (LHC) [8]. Particularly, DSSCs emerged as technically and economically credible alternatives [1,2,3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Their working principle considers increasing the LHC by including a layer of molecular dyes to potentialize the exciton creation. These excitons may be further dissociated into free charge carriers, improving the efficiency of the photovoltaic effect [1,2,3]. Since the advent of DSSCs, the search for new dyes that can enhance their LHC has received much attention [3].
One of the critical materials in DSSC is the sensitizer. Ruthenium-based DSSC complexes show high efficiency and excellent stability, implying potential practical applications [1,16]. However, ruthenium dyes are not suitable for environmentally friendly photovoltaic systems. Ruthenium is expensive and environmentally hazardous, and ruthenium-based compounds are highly toxic and carcinogenic. When these compounds are heated in the presence of air, they form ruthenium tetroxide, which is a highly volatile and toxic compound that damages the eyes and upper respiratory system [17]. Due to this reason, natural dyes are considered in DSSC as substitutes for ruthenium. Natural dyes are easily and safely extracted from plants, not requiring complex synthesis or toxicity tests to be used in DSSCs. Moreover, they have a low cost of synthesis and are environmentally friendly.
So far, natural dyes in DSSCs have shown overall conversion efficiencies below 1%. Several natural dyes such as betalains [18,19], anthocyanins [20,21], and carotenes [22] have been used as sensitizers in DSSCs. Recently, a considerable sensitization activity using the natural dyes extracted from Pastinaca sativa and Beta vulgaris was achieved [22]. It was found that the betaxanthin and betacyanin dyes, each with absorptions at different wavelengths, helped the DSSC to capture photons of two different energies. Short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) and the open-circuit voltage (VOC) for a DSSC using Pastinaca sativa as a sensitizer are 0.42 V and 7.2 mA/cm 2 , respectively.
Among the extensive class of natural dyes, achiote (Bixa orellana L.) is a plant commonly found in South and Central America. After being crushed, its seeds serve as condiments and food coloring. Moreover, the pigments in these seeds (especially the bixin and norbixin) are used in the textile, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries [23,24]. Importantly, these molecules were considered in a DSSC application [25].
The bixin molecule (see Figure 1) represents nearly 80% of the pigments in the seed, with the molecular formula C 25 H 30 O 4 . Bixin has a carboxylic acid functional group at one end and an ester group at the other. These groups are separated by nine conjugated double bonds, serving as excellent receptors of free radicals and substituting methyl [26]. Commonly, bixin has geometric isomerism Z in the sixteenth carbon and isomerism E in the rest of the chain [27]. The isomeric structure in which all the carbons of the chain are in isomerism E, named trans-bixin or isobixin (see Figure 1), may be formed with the pigment extraction process [27].
Norbixin, in turn, has the molecular formula C 24 H 28 O 4 . It has a similar structure to bixin but with a carboxylic acid group in each extremity. This configuration is responsible for its anionic property and hydrosoluble character [28]. Similar to bixin, norbixin also presents isomerism Z in its conjugated chain. Submitting the norbixin to controlled heating is a way of producing the trans-norbixin or isonorbixin (see Figure 1). Although these pigments have been used in developing DSSCs [25], some of their optoelectronic and structural properties remain under-investigated.
Efficiency in photovoltaics is strictly related to the exciton dissociation mechanism, and a crucial aspect in the operation of these devices is the distinct nature of the optically excited states [29,30]. In inorganic photovoltaic devices, light absorption directly yields free charge carriers. Conversely, this process in organic-based materials leads to the formation of delocalized electron and hole states, which are coupled due to the strong electron-lattice interactions forming an exciton. The exciton binding energy in organic materials is about 500 meV, ten times higher concerning inorganic materials [29]. Although bixin and norbixin pigments were used to fabricate a DSSC, we address their nonlinear optical and excited-state properties (crucial aspects in the photovoltaic operation), which remain un-discussed. Moreover, we point to the best computational approach to estimate these properties with values comparable to the experimental data. Herein, we analyze through DFT and time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations of the structural and optoelectronic properties of four molecules present in the achiote (Bixa orellana L.): bixin, isobixin, norbixin, and isonorbixin, for possible applications of these natural dyes in photovoltaics. The computational protocol employed here considers different DFT functionals and basis sets used to estimate crucial optical parameters of these dyes, such as the vertical transition energies, wavelengths, oscillator strengths, and transition dipole moments. The bond-length alternation (BLA), frontier molecular orbitals, nonlinear optical properties, and absorption spectra were also obtained. The BLA provides information on conjugated oligomers once the extension of the conjugation pathway in their backbone is an important parameter associated with the mobility of the charge carriers.

2. Computational Details

DFT is a widely used tool for electronic structure calculations as it provides reliable information without a high computational cost. In the literature, there are several forms of development for the exchange and correlation functional, which seeks a real potential value of the interaction between the electrons of a system, for example, the generalized gradient approximation (GGA), a very popular approximation which, depending on the electron density and its gradient, describes the exchange and correlation energies [31]. The introduction of a term of a second-order derivative of density and/or kinetic energy density as additional degrees of freedom gives rise to another approximation, the meta-GGA [32]. Furthermore, there are also hybrid functionals, a combination of formulations of the Hartree-Fock exchange functional with exchange approximations and correlations used in DFT, such as GGA and meta-GGA. This form of blending improves the performance of energies in some situations and the different forms of this approach are related to the parameter used in the formulations. The Lee–Yang–Parr three-parameter Becke exchange and correlation functional (B3LYP) is a GGA hybrid, composed of the Hartree–Fock exchange functional (HF) and the GGA exchange and correlation approximation [33]. In addition, B3LYP has a version that includes a long-range fix, which addresses the Coulomb attenuating (CAM) method. This functional is known as CAM-B3LYP [34]. Another highlighted functional is Minnesota 2006 (M06), consisting of a meta-GGA hybrid type exchange and correlation functional. It is reasonable in evaluations of proton affinity in conjugated polyene chain and a good description of the π π stacking interaction [35].
To obtain the optimized molecular geometries, we employed DFT calculations considering three different functionals, i.e., B3LYP, M06, and CAMB3LYP, with the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set [33,34,35,36]. We also performed the geometry optimization of the molecules presented in Figure 1 using these functionals and the 6-31G and 6-31G(d,p) basis sets. All the calculations considered molecules in the gas phase. The polarized continuum model (PCM) was used to include molecules in solution with chloroform.
Low-lying singlet excited states were evaluated at the optimized geometries using time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) [37]. The optical absorption profiles were simulated through convolution of the vertical transition energies with the Gaussian functions by a full width at half maximum (FWHM) equal to 0.37 eV (3000 cm 1 ). We adopted FWHM = 0.37 eV for all peaks since it is the standard value used in the literature, presenting a good track record [38,39]. All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 (Revision D.01) suite [40].

3. Results

3.1. Structural and Electronic Properties

We begin our discussion by presenting the geometric properties of the molecular dyes studied here. Figure 2 illustrates their optimized structures. As a general trend, we observed that the molecules, in both chloroform solution and gas-phase cases, present nearly planar lattice configurations with small torsion angles (about 1–2 degrees) in the edges. Such a signature for the lattice arrangement allows for the wavefunction delocalization on the π -conjugated backbone. All the molecules showed similar extensions of conjugation, i.e., nine carbon double bonds C = C on the π -conjugated backbone. According to the earlier studies [41,42], these findings indicate that the electronic and optical properties of the dyes in Figure 1 tend to present similar behavior.
As mentioned above, BLA is a crucial geometric parameter related to the electronic energy gap [43,44]. BLA is defined as ( R single R double ) / N , where R single , R double , and N denote single bond length, double bonds length, and the number of the single-double bond pairs in a π -delocalized system, respectively [44]. Here, we used the BLA values to realize possible changes in the bond length configuration of the dyes. In this way, Figure 3 shows the examined bonds, and Table 1 and Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5 and Table A6 (Appendix A) show bond lengths and BLA values of the π -conjugated backbone for the dyes in gas phase and chloroform solution. For each DFT functional, we observed that both bond lengths and BLA values are similar among the dyes, and the solvent effect can be observed on the reduction of the BLA values when contrasted with the gas phase molecules. CAM-B3LYP provides higher single-bond lengths and lower double-bond lengths concerning the results obtained by employing B3LYP and M06. Consequently, results from CAM-B3LYP present higher BLA values. The total BLA values increased, in sequence, from B3LYP, M06, to CAM-B3LYP, indicating that the higher Hartree–Fock (HF) contribution on the DFT functional leads to higher BLA values. This behavior also impacted the HOMO-LUMO energy gap, as shown later.
Figure 4 and Figure A1, Figure A2 and Figure A3 (see Appendix A) illustrate the HOMO and LUMO wavefunctions of the dyes in the chloroform solution and gas-phase cases. One can note that the frontier molecular orbitals widely delocalized on the π -conjugated backbone. Moreover, no impediment to electronic mobility along the π -conjugated chain was realized. This feature aggregates a metallic character to the polyenic systems since π -electrons of the conjugated chains are not part of a particular bond between atoms, which allows the charge to move along the chain freely [45].
According to Koopman’s theorem, the HOMO energy is the first approximation to the potential of molecular ionization [46]. By analogy, the LUMO energy is an approximation for the electron affinity. In this context, Table 2 and Table A7, Table A8, Table A9, Table A10, Table A11 and Table A12 (see Appendix A) show the energies of the frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) and HOMO-LUMO gap energies of the dyes in the gas phase and chloroform solution. One can note a slight variation of the frontier MOs energies and gap energy for the same functional. We observed differences in the gap energy values for each DFT functional, which increased from B3LYP, M06, to CAM-B3LYP in sequence. These differences are related to the HF contribution since high HF contributions to the DFT functionals induce higher gap energy values. We also note an interplay between BLA and the electronic gap, where an increase in the BLA values leads to an increase in gap energy values. In general, for all DFT functionals and basis sets used, the cis conformation presented gap energy values higher than the trans conformation, i.e., the trans conformation is energetically more stable than its cis analog.

3.2. Nonlinear Optical Properties

The nonlinear optical (NLO) response in conjugated organic molecules can be optimized by varying the BLA values as proposed by Marder et al. [47]. It is essential to choose an appropriate basis set for the accurate description of NLO properties [48,49,50]. In this context, we investigate the electric properties of the isomers both in the gas-phase and chloroform solution to see how these properties were impacted both by the BLA behavior and by the choice of basis set. The analyzed quantities were the normal experimentally measured values, i.e., the dipole moment magnitude μ = μ x 2 + μ y 2 + μ z 2 , the average linear polarizability α = α x x + α y y + α z z 3 , and the vector component of the first hyperpolarizability β v e c = i β i μ i μ ; [ i = x , y , z ] , where β i = k β i k k ; [ k = x , y , z ] .
Table 3 and Table A13, Table A14, Table A15 and Table A16 (see Appendix A) show the absolute values of obtained electric quantities for different DFT functionals and basis sets. Here, we observed that the values of the μ , α , and β v e c obtained with the CAM-B3LYP functional are smaller than B3LYP and M06. The exception occurred in isonorbixin with B3LYP that presented smaller values of μ and β v e c compared to CAM-B3LYP and M06. As CAM-BLYP provided the highest values of BLA (see Table 1), the findings indicate that higher values of BLA had lower values of μ , α , and β v e c . This relationship is in agreement with the work of Labidi et al. for transhexatriene [51]. In addition, the isobixin presented the highest values of μ and α , and bixin presented the highest values of β v e c .
Furthermore, the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set provided the highest values of α followed in descending order by 6-31G and 6-31G(d,p) basis sets, so the inclusion of the diffuse function on the basis set induced increasing α values. On the other hand, this behavior was not observed in μ and β v e c . The highest values of μ and β v e c of isomers in the gas-phase were provided by the 6-31G basis set. However, there were some cases where the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set provided the highest values of μ and β v e c of isomers in chloroform solution. Furthermore, the findings of μ and β v e c with the 6-31G(d,p) basis set were the lowest compared to the 6-31G and 6-31+G(d,p) basis set. We concluded the analysis of the NLO properties of isomers by observing that the solvent effect caused an increase of μ , α , and β v e c .

3.3. Excited States Properties

We now turn to the description of the low-lying excited states and optical properties of the molecular dyes. Here, we used Gaussian convolution of the wavelength to obtain the absorption spectra of these molecules and then compare the theoretical results of the UV-Vis absorption peak position with the experimental values. Figure 5, Figure A4 and Figure A5 (see Appendix A) show the absorption spectra of the molecules obtained by the Gaussian convolution of the vertical transitions with the FWHM = 0.37 eV (3000 cm 1 ). One can see that the solvent induces a slight shift in the absorption spectra to higher wavelengths considering the absorption bands. For each case, i.e., gas phase or chloroform solution with the same DFT functional and basis set, all molecules presented maximum absorption peaks in the same region, which can be associated with the same extension of backbone conjugation and close gap energies.
Calculations with different DFT functionals revealed a shift in the absorption band positions to higher wavelengths from CAM-B3LYP, M06, to B3LYP, in sequence. We associate the increase of the gap energy with the decrease of the wavelength (analogously, an increase in the vertical energy). The relationship between the BLA values and the position of the absorption bands can be understood as follows: an increase in the average BLA value implies a decrease in the overlap between atomic orbitals, consequently leading the absorption bands to shift to higher energies (lower wavelengths).
Finally, Table 4, Table A17 and Table A18 (see Appendix A) show the values of the vertical transition energy ( E 01 ), the wavelength of the maximum absorption peak ( λ 01 ), oscillator strength (f), and transition dipole moment ( μ 01 ). In all cases, we observed that the transition dipole moment was mainly on the conjugated backbone, i.e., along the x-direction, and isobixin and isonorbixin presented higher values about μ 01 . The experimental data showed that the maximum peaks of bixin, isobixin, norbixin, and isonorbixin were in the blue region, i.e., 470, 476, 468, and 475 nm, respectively [52]. From these data, we conclude that the results obtained with the CAM-B3LYP functional and 6-31+G(d,p) basis set presented a better description of the optical properties. We can attribute this result to the higher HF contribution on the CAM-B3LYP functional compared to the others, combined with the inclusion of the diffuse and polarization functions on the basis set that is generally more appropriate to describe polyene systems.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we employed DFT and TD-DFT calculations to study the geometrical and optoelectronic properties of bixin and norbixin isomers. These molecules are present in the achiote seeds, a plant found in tropical America. Since they present a clear UV-Vis absorption spectrum, they can be good candidates for developing novel DSSCs. The DFT and TD-DFT calculations were conducted within the framework of three different functionals (B3LYP, CAM-B3LYP, and M06) and basis sets (6-31+G(d,p), 6-31G(d,p), and 6-31G).
As a general trend, we observed that these molecules in chloroform solution and gas-phase presented almost planar lattice configurations with small torsion angles in the edges. Such a lattice arrangement allows wavefunction delocalization on the π -conjugated backbone. Moreover, their similar extension in the conjugation pathway leads to close values for their MO energies. The HOMO-LUMO gap energy values increased from the B3LYP, M06, to CAM-B3LYP levels of theory, in the sequence as a response for increasing HF contribution to the DFT functional.
In the optical properties study, we observed that the increase of the HF contribution is reflected in the shift of the bands to lower wavelengths (or higher energies). The absorption bands of the molecules in the chloroform solution were slightly shifted to a higher wavelength concerning the gas phase. We also obtained the vertical transition energies, wavelengths, oscillator strengths, and transition dipole moments. Here, we observed that the transition dipole moments for all the molecular dyes were aligned with the molecular axis, and the comparison with the experimental data showed that the CAM-B3LYP functional, with the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set, provided a better description of the optical properties.
It is important to stress that bixin represents the main carotenoid found in the achiote seeds. In addition, the absorption peak position was comparable for both Z-isomer (bixin) and E-isomer (isobixin), which indicates that light capture and exciton formation tend to be similar in the two isomers.
This work provided a benchmark on the computational methodologies for the electronic and optical characterization of natural dyes, which is absent in the literature. Although bixin and norbixin do not perform better than other molecules recently reported in the literature for some photovoltaic applications, they are still worth investigating. These molecules are abundant in Tropical America (composed only of developing countries) and have easy extraction. These crucial features can aggregate in the final product a good cost-benefit relationship, which is attractive when it comes to manufacturing of organic-based optoelectronic devices and their possible commercialization in developing countries.

Author Contributions

I.T.L., J.d.S.C., O.P.d.S.N., L.A.R.J. and D.A.d.S.F. conceived the calculations. I.T.L., J.d.S.C., O.P.d.S.N., L.A.R.J. and R.T.d.S.J. analyzed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Edital DPI-UnB No. 02/2021, CNPq (grants 305975/2019-6, and 420836/2018-7) and FAP-DF (grants 193.001.596/2017 and 193-00001220/2021-37). This research was funded by a Brazilian Research Council FAP-DF grants 00193-00000853/2021-28, 00193-00000857/2021-14, 00193-00000811/2021-97, and CNPq grant 302236/2018-0, respectively. This research was funded by IFD/UnB (Edital 01/2020) grant 23106.090790/2020-86. This research was funded by EC Horizon 2020 HEROES project grant 101021801, CNPq grants 465741/2014-2 and 312180/2019-5, CAPES grant 88887.144009/2017-00, and FAP-DF grants 0193.001366/2016 and 0193.001365/2016. This research was funded by ABIN grant 08/2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the main article and Appendix A.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Brazilian research agencies CNPq, FAPESP, and FAP-DF. D.A.d.S.F. acknowledges the financial support from the Edital DPI-UnB, from CNPq and FAP-DF. L.A.R.J. acknowledges the financial support from a Brazilian Research Council FAP-DF, CNPq and IFD/UnB (Edital 01/2020) and acknowledges CENAPAD-SP for providing the computational facilities. R.T.d.S.J. gratefully acknowledges, respectively, the support from EC Horizon 2020 HEROES project, CNPq, CAPES, and FAP-DF. L.A.R.J. and R.T.d.S.J. gratefully acknowledge the support from ABIN.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conclict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Table A1. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
bixinisobixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4791.3560.1231.4791.3560.123
b 3 b 4 1.4511.3710.0791.4511.3710.080
b 5 b 6 1.4341.3670.0671.4341.3670.067
b 7 b 8 1.4431.3760.0671.4431.3760.067
b 9 b 10 1.4291.3700.0591.4291.3710.059
b 11 b 12 1.4301.3750.0541.4291.3760.053
b 13 b 14 1.4451.3660.0791.4441.3670.077
b 15 b 16 1.4381.3720.0651.4351.3710.064
b 17 b 18 1.4511.3550.0971.4501.3540.095
norbixinisonorbixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4791.3560.1231.4651.3560.109
b 3 b 4 1.4511.3710.0801.4501.3720.078
b 5 b 6 1.4341.3670.0671.4341.3670.067
b 7 b 8 1.4431.3760.0671.4431.3760.067
b 9 b 10 1.4291.3700.0591.4291.3710.059
b 11 b 12 1.4301.3750.0541.4291.3760.053
b 13 b 14 1.4451.3660.0791.4431.3670.076
b 15 b 16 1.4371.3730.0641.4341.3720.062
b 17 b 18 1.4501.3560.0941.4481.3560.092
Figure A1. Schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Figure A1. Schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Molecules 27 02138 g0a1
Table A2. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Table A2. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
bixinisobixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4801.3440.1371.4801.3440.137
b 3 b 4 1.4571.3560.1011.4571.3560.101
b 5 b 6 1.4441.3510.0921.4441.3510.092
b 7 b 8 1.4531.3580.0951.4531.3580.095
b 9 b 10 1.4411.3530.0881.4411.3530.088
b 11 b 12 1.4411.3580.0831.4411.3580.083
b 13 b 14 1.4541.3500.1041.4541.3510.103
b 15 b 16 1.4461.3560.0901.4441.3560.088
b 17 b 18 1.4571.3430.1141.4551.3430.112
norbixinisonorbixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4811.3440.1371.4811.3440.137
b 3 b 4 1.4571.3560.1011.4571.3560.101
b 5 b 6 1.4441.3510.0931.4441.3510.093
b 7 b 8 1.4531.3580.0951.4531.3580.095
b 9 b 10 1.4411.3530.0881.4411.3530.088
b 11 b 12 1.4411.3580.0831.4411.3580.083
b 13 b 14 1.4541.3500.1041.4531.3510.102
b 15 b 16 1.4461.3570.0891.4441.3560.087
b 17 b 18 1.4561.3440.1121.4541.3440.110
Table A3. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the M06/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Table A3. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the M06/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
bixinisobixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4741.3490.1241.4741.3490.124
b 3 b 4 1.4461.3640.0821.4461.3640.082
b 5 b 6 1.4311.3600.0711.4311.3600.071
b 7 b 8 1.4391.3680.0711.4391.3680.071
b 9 b 10 1.4261.3620.0641.4261.3620.063
b 11 b 12 1.4271.3670.0591.4261.3680.058
b 13 b 14 1.4411.3580.0821.4391.3590.080
b 15 b 16 1.4341.3650.0691.4311.3640.068
b 17 b 18 1.4461.3490.0981.4441.3480.096
norbixinisonorbixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4741.3490.1251.4741.3490.124
b 3 b 4 1.4461.3640.0821.4461.3640.082
b 5 b 6 1.4301.3600.0711.4311.3600.071
b 7 b 8 1.4391.3680.0711.4391.3680.071
b 9 b 10 1.4261.3630.0631.4261.3620.064
b 11 b 12 1.4261.3680.0591.4261.3680.058
b 13 b 14 1.4401.3590.0811.4391.3590.080
b 15 b 16 1.4331.3650.0681.4311.3640.067
b 17 b 18 1.4451.3500.0951.4431.3490.094
Table A4. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Table A4. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
bixinisobixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4691.3590.1101.4691.3590.111
b 3 b 4 1.4471.3740.0731.4471.3740.073
b 5 b 6 1.4331.3690.0641.4331.3690.064
b 7 b 8 1.4431.3770.0651.4421.3770.065
b 9 b 10 1.4301.3710.0581.4291.3710.058
b 11 b 12 1.4301.3760.0541.4291.3770.052
b 13 b 14 1.4451.3670.0781.4441.3680.076
b 15 b 16 1.4371.3740.0631.4341.3730.061
b 17 b 18 1.4491.3570.0931.4481.3570.091
norbixinisonorbixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4691.3590.1101.4701.3590.111
b 3 b 4 1.4481.3740.0741.4481.3740.074
b 5 b 6 1.4331.3690.0641.4331.3690.065
b 7 b 8 1.4431.3770.0661.4431.3770.065
b 9 b 10 1.4301.3710.0581.4291.3710.058
b 11 b 12 1.4301.3770.0531.4291.3770.052
b 13 b 14 1.4451.3670.0781.4431.3680.075
b 15 b 16 1.4361.3750.0621.4341.3740.060
b 17 b 18 1.4481.3580.0901.4461.3580.088
Table A5. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Table A5. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
bixinisobixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4721.3460.1261.4731.3460.127
b 3 b 4 1.4551.3580.0971.4551.3580.097
b 5 b 6 1.4431.3520.0911.4431.3520.091
b 7 b 8 1.4531.3590.0941.4531.3590.094
b 9 b 10 1.4411.3540.0871.4411.3540.087
b 11 b 12 1.4421.3590.0831.4411.3590.082
b 13 b 14 1.4551.3510.1041.4541.3520.102
b 15 b 16 1.4471.3580.0891.4441.3570.087
b 17 b 18 1.4561.3450.1111.4541.3450.109
norbixinisonorbixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4721.3460.1261.4731.3460.127
b 3 b 4 1.4551.3580.0971.4551.3570.097
b 5 b 6 1.4431.3520.0911.4431.3520.091
b 7 b 8 1.4531.3590.0941.4531.3590.094
b 9 b 10 1.4411.3540.0871.4411.3540.087
b 11 b 12 1.4411.3590.0831.4411.3590.082
b 13 b 14 1.4551.3510.1031.4531.3520.102
b 15 b 16 1.4461.3580.0881.4431.3580.085
b 17 b 18 1.4541.3460.1081.4521.3460.106
Table A6. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the M06/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Table A6. Single-double bonds and local BLA values (Å) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the M06/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
bixinisobixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4651.3520.1131.4651.3520.113
b 3 b 4 1.4431.3660.0771.4431.3660.077
b 5 b 6 1.4301.3610.0681.4301.3610.069
b 7 b 8 1.4391.3690.0701.4391.3690.070
b 9 b 10 1.4271.3630.0631.4261.3630.063
b 11 b 12 1.4271.3680.0591.4261.3690.058
b 13 b 14 1.4411.3590.0811.4391.3600.079
b 15 b 16 1.4331.3660.0671.4311.3650.065
b 17 b 18 1.4451.3510.0941.4431.3510.092
norbixinisonorbixin
bondssingledoublelocal BLAsingledoublelocal BLA
b 1 b 2 1.4651.3520.1131.4651.3520.113
b 3 b 4 1.4431.3660.0771.4431.3660.077
b 5 b 6 1.4301.3610.0691.4301.3610.069
b 7 b 8 1.4391.3690.0701.4391.3690.070
b 9 b 10 1.4271.3630.0631.4261.3630.063
b 11 b 12 1.4271.3680.0581.4261.3690.057
b 13 b 14 1.4401.3600.0811.4391.3610.078
b 15 b 16 1.4331.3670.0661.4301.3660.064
b 17 b 18 1.4431.3520.0911.4411.3520.089
Table A7. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
Table A7. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
MoleculeHOMO-2HOMO-1HOMOLUMOLUMO+1LUMO+2Gap
B3LYP
bixin−6.884−6.068−5.116−2.939−2.122−1.3332.177
isobixin−6.857−6.041−5.116−2.966−2.095−1.2522.150
norbixin−6.912−6.123−5.170−2.966−2.177−1.3882.204
isonorbixin−6.912−6.095−5.170−2.993−2.177−1.3062.177
CAM-B3LYP
bixin−8.245−7.320−6.259−1.714−0.898−0.0274.544
isobixin−8.245−7.293−6.259−1.742−0.8980.0544.517
norbixin−8.299−7.347−6.286−1.742−0.952−0.0824.544
isonorbixin−8.272−7.347−6.286−1.769−0.9520.0004.517
M06
bixin−7.184−6.340−5.361−2.830−2.014−1.1702.531
isobixin−7.184−6.340−5.361−2.857−1.986−1.0882.503
norbixin−7.211−6.395−5.415−2.857−2.068−1.2252.558
isonorbixin−7.211−6.395−5.415−2.884−2.041−1.1432.531
Table A8. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
Table A8. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
MoleculeHOMO-2HOMO-1HOMOLUMOLUMO+1LUMO+2Gap
B3LYP
bixin−6.803−5.987−5.089−2.830−1.959−1.1972.259
isobixin−6.776−5.987−5.061−2.857−1.959−1.0882.204
norbixin−6.830−6.041−5.116−2.857−2.014−1.2252.259
isonorbixin−6.830−6.014−5.089−2.884−1.986−1.1432.204
CAM-B3LYP
bixin−8.191−7.265−6.231−1.578−0.7350.1364.653
isobixin−8.163−7.238−6.231−1.605−0.7070.2454.626
norbixin−8.218−7.293−6.259−1.605−0.7620.1094.653
isonorbixin−8.191−7.265−6.259−1.633−0.7620.2184.626
M06
bixin−7.102−6.286−5.333−2.694−1.823−1.0072.640
isobixin−7.075−6.259−5.306−2.694−1.823−0.9252.612
norbixin−7.129−6.313−5.361−2.721−1.878−1.0612.640
isonorbixin−7.129−6.286−5.361−2.721−1.850−0.9522.640
Table A9. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
Table A9. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
MoleculeHOMO-2HOMO-1HOMOLUMOLUMO+1LUMO+2Gap
B3LYP
bixin−7.102−6.313−5.388−3.184−2.340−1.5782.204
isobixin−7.075−6.286−5.361−3.184−2.313−1.4692.177
norbixin−7.157−6.340−5.415−3.211−2.395−1.6602.204
isonorbixin−7.048−6.231−5.333−3.157−2.286−1.4422.177
CAM-B3LYP
bixin−8.463−7.538−6.531−1.959−1.088−0.2994.572
isobixin−8.436−7.510−6.504−1.986−1.088−0.1634.517
norbixin−8.517−7.592−6.558−1.986−1.170−0.3544.572
isonorbixin−8.490−7.565−6.558−2.014−1.170−0.2184.544
M06
bixin−7.347−6.531−5.578−2.993−2.150−1.3882.585
isobixin−7.320−6.504−5.551−3.020−2.122−1.2792.531
norbixin−7.402−6.558−5.606−3.020−2.204−1.4422.585
isonorbixin−7.374−6.558−5.606−3.048−2.177−1.3332.558
Table A10. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
Table A10. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
MoleculeHOMO-2HOMO-1HOMOLUMOLUMO+1LUMO+2Gap
B3LYP
bixin−6.776−5.959−4.980−2.857−2.095−1.2792.122
isobixin−6.776−5.932−4.980−2.884−2.095−1.2252.095
norbixin−6.803−5.987−5.007−2.884−2.150−1.3332.122
isonorbixin−6.776−5.959−5.007−2.912−2.122−1.2522.095
CAM-B3LYP
bixin−8.136−7.184−6.123−1.633−0.8710.0004.490
isobixin−8.136−7.184−6.123−1.660−0.8980.0824.463
norbixin−8.163−7.211−6.123−1.660−0.925−0.0274.463
isonorbixin−8.163−7.211−6.123−1.687−0.9250.0544.435
M06
bixin−7.075−6.231−5.225−2.748−1.986−1.1432.476
isobixin−7.075−6.231−5.252−2.776−1.959−1.0612.476
norbixin−7.102−6.259−5.252−2.776−2.014−1.1702.476
isonorbixin−7.102−6.259−5.252−2.803−2.014−1.0882.449
Table A11. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
Table A11. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
MoleculeHOMO-2HOMO-1HOMOLUMOLUMO+1LUMO+2Gap
B3LYP
bixin−6.694−5.905−4.952−2.748−1.932−1.1432.204
isobixin−6.694−5.878−4.952−2.776−1.932−1.0612.177
norbixin−6.721−5.905−4.980−2.776−1.959−1.1702.204
isonorbixin−6.721−5.905−4.980−2.803−1.959−1.0882.177
CAM-B3LYP
bixin−8.082−7.157−6.123−1.497−0.7070.1904.626
isobixin−8.082−7.129−6.123−1.524−0.7070.2724.599
norbixin−8.109−7.184−6.123−1.524−0.7350.1634.599
isonorbixin−8.109−7.157−6.123−1.551−0.7350.2454.572
M06
bixin−6.993−6.177−5.197−2.612−1.796−0.9802.585
isobixin−6.993−6.150−5.197−2.640−1.796−0.8982.558
norbixin−7.021−6.204−5.225−2.612−1.823−1.0072.612
isonorbixin−7.021−6.177−5.225−2.640−1.823−0.8982.585
Table A12. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
Table A12. Frontier MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set. All values are in electron-Volt (eV).
MoleculeHOMO-2HOMO-1HOMOLUMOLUMO+1LUMO+2Gap
B3LYP
bixin−6.973−6.165−5.221−3.073−2.287−1.5302.148
isobixin−6.965−6.153−5.220−3.099−2.278−1.4242.121
norbixin−7.003−6.194−5.244−3.104−2.341−1.5722.141
isonorbixin−6.996−6.185−5.249−3.134−2.324−1.4662.115
CAM-B3LYP
bixin−8.338−7.408−6.360−1.853−1.073−0.2514.507
isobixin−8.326−7.390−6.353−1.879−1.076−0.1264.474
norbixin−8.365−7.433−6.379−1.879−1.130−0.2944.499
isonorbixin−8.354−7.419−6.376−1.911−1.123−0.1674.465
M06
bixin−7.223−6.400−5.428−2.889−2.102−1.3392.538
isobixin−7.215−6.388−5.426−2.918−2.096−1.2212.508
norbixin−7.248−6.424−5.447−2.915−2.147−1.3742.532
isonorbixin−7.241−6.416−5.450−2.948−2.136−1.2572.503
Table A13. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set.
Table A13. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set.
DFT-Functional μ ( Debye ) α ( 10 24   esu ) β vec ( 10 30   esu )
bixin
B3LYP6.23108.91122.63
CAM-B3LYP5.5182.2469.87
M066.26105.7110.09
isobixin
B3LYP6.96114.4499.48
CAM-B3LYP6.5085.1445.94
M067.06110.6787.54
norbixin
B3LYP6.34107.0693.68
CAM-B3LYP5.7580.656.05
M066.33104.0885.86
isonorbixin
B3LYP5.67111.2162.25
CAM-B3LYP5.4782.7128.56
M065.83107.557.52
Table A14. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set.
Table A14. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set.
DFT-Functional μ ( Debye ) α ( 10 24   esu ) β vec ( 10 30   esu )
bixin
B3LYP7.16150.63332.61
CAM-B3LYP6.04103.28132.25
M067.03145.28286.75
isobixin
B3LYP7.89158.01219.69
CAM-B3LYP7.34106.5466.06
M067.99151.95184.02
norbixin
B3LYP7.32149.53266.03
CAM-B3LYP6.39101.78110.87
M067.26143.84229.14
isonorbixin
B3LYP6.52155.39133.3
CAM-B3LYP6.30104.438.54
M066.70149.01116.7
Table A15. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set.
Table A15. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set.
DFT-Functional μ ( Debye ) α ( 10 24   esu ) β vec ( 10 30   esu )
bixin
B3LYP5.17106.2985.36
CAM-B3LYP4.6481.3347.88
M065.1102.3476.80
isobixin
B3LYP6.08111.5571.24
CAM-B3LYP5.7384.1331.17
M066.05106.7260.45
norbixin
B3LYP5.29104.3065.79
CAM-B3LYP4.8579.5738.94
M065.28100.1161.7
isonorbixin
B3LYP5.10108.2744.22
CAM-B3LYP4.9381.6319.26
M065.19103.5241.55
Table A16. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set.
Table A16. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set.
DFT-Functional μ ( Debye ) α ( 10 24   esu ) β vec ( 10 30   esu )
bixin
B3LYP5.88143.81225.45
CAM-B3LYP5.06100.9387.75
M065.74136.84189.44
isobixin
B3LYP6.90150.53142.5
CAM-B3LYP6.52103.9539.71
M066.87142.58111.24
norbixin
B3LYP6.10142.13179.24
CAM-B3LYP5.3999.1975.02
M065.99135.01156.21
isonorbixin
B3LYP5.88147.6585.7
CAM-B3LYP5.73101.6322.20
M065.98139.6771.32
Figure A2. Schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the M06/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Figure A2. Schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the M06/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Molecules 27 02138 g0a2
Figure A3. Schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the molecular dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Figure A3. Schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the molecular dyes in gas phase. These results were obtained by employing the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Molecules 27 02138 g0a3
Figure A4. Absorption spectra of molecular dyes in (a) gas phase and (b) chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set.
Figure A4. Absorption spectra of molecular dyes in (a) gas phase and (b) chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set.
Molecules 27 02138 g0a4
Figure A5. Absorption spectra of molecular dyes in (a) gas phase and (b) chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set.
Figure A5. Absorption spectra of molecular dyes in (a) gas phase and (b) chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set.
Molecules 27 02138 g0a5
Table A17. S 0 S 1 vertical transition energies ( E 01 ), wavelength ( λ 01 ), oscillator strength (f), and transition dipole moments ( μ 01 ). These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set.
Table A17. S 0 S 1 vertical transition energies ( E 01 ), wavelength ( λ 01 ), oscillator strength (f), and transition dipole moments ( μ 01 ). These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G basis set.
Molecule E 01 (eV) λ 01 (nm)f μ 01 (Debye)
xyztot
B3LYP
gas
bixin2.270546.163.35319.722−0.1510.01219.722
isobixin2.258549.013.60120.441−1.426−0.00620.490
norbixin2.272545.743.37319.763−0.613−0.00419.772
isonorbixin2.264547.673.58520.383−1.2440.00720.421
chloroform
bixin2.032610.113.53321.397−0.1300.03721.397
isobixin2.020613.733.79622.190−1.575−0.02022.246
norbixin2.028611.473.53921.4270.669−0.01121.438
isonorbixin2.018614.263.76322.115−1.3610.00622.157
CAM-B3LYP
gas
bixin2.872431.723.663−18.3100.769−0.01018.326
isobixin2.856434.193.88318.8092.067−0.01918.922
norbixin2.870431.953.664−18.2951.2000.00118.334
isonorbixin2.855434.223.832−18.7041.882−0.01818.799
chloroform
bixin2.663465.523.81319.397−0.8520.02219.416
isobixin2.644468.894.01719.8712.272−0.01620.000
norbixin2.657466.563.810−19.3831.3470.01419.430
isonorbixin2.639469.93.973−19.8052.072−0.01319.913
M06
gas
bixin2.325533.23.426−19.6950.351−0.01619.699
isobixin2.313536.13.669−20.3681.710−0.01720.440
norbixin2.325533.373.44019.725−0.796−0.00419.741
isonorbixin2.317535.063.631−20.2561.526−0.01520.313
chloroform
bixin2.086594.313.59221.290−0.3610.03321.293
isobixin2.073598.233.82621.968−1.8880.01322.049
norbixin2.083595.173.58921.282−0.890−0.02321.301
isonorbixin2.071598.73.78721.879−1.6780.00721.943
Table A18. S 0 S 1 vertical transition energies ( E 01 ), wavelength ( λ 01 ), oscillator strength (f), and transition dipole moments ( μ 01 ). These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set.
Table A18. S 0 S 1 vertical transition energies ( E 01 ), wavelength ( λ 01 ), oscillator strength (f), and transition dipole moments ( μ 01 ). These results were obtained by employing the 6-31G(d,p) basis set.
Molecule E 01 (eV) λ 01 (nm)f μ 01 (Debye)
xyztot
B3LYP
gas
bixin2.309536.943.33419.500−0.1740.00419.500
isobixin2.293540.643.56520.170−1.574−0.01520.232
norbixin2.312536.233.34419.505−0.6010.00319.514
isonorbixin2.299539.263.531−20.061−1.392−0.01720.109
chloroform
bixin2.088593.883.49721.002−0.1740.00721.003
isobixin2.072598.313.73121.700−1.775−0.01321.773
norbixin2.087594.223.49720.998−0.680−0.00321.009
isonorbixin2.072598.293.693−21.606−1.569−0.01421.663
CAM-B3LYP
gas
bixin2.905426.733.612−18.0780.748−0.00118.093
isobixin2.886429.673.809−18.5172.1670.02818.643
norbixin2.906426.623.611−18.0521.150−0.00818.089
isonorbixin2.887429.423.757−18.4031.989−0.02818.510
chloroform
bixin2.713457.013.756−19.0740.8470.02319.093
isobixin2.692460.613.934−19.4672.4240.02019.617
norbixin2.710457.463.752−19.0481.309−0.02219.093
isonorbixin2.689461.063.892−19.3962.228−0.02719.523
M06
gas
bixin2.377521.673.380−19.348−0.358−0.00119.351
isobixin2.364524.583.59519.930−1.831−0.02420.014
norbixin2.382520.423.37619.301−0.776−0.00319.316
isonorbixin2.368523.493.547−19.790−1.656−0.02619.859
chloroform
bixin2.158574.473.527−20.741−0.3990.00320.745
isobixin2.1415793.73721.336−2.069−0.01121.436
norbixin2.158574.613.52320.718−0.8850.00420.737
isonorbixin2.142578.883.695−21.231−1.871−0.02221.314

References

  1. O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kay, A.; Grätzel, M. Low cost photovoltaic modules based on dye sensitized nanocrystalline titanium dioxide and carbon powder. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1996, 44, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sharma, K.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, S.S. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Fundamentals and Current Status. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bronstein, H.; Nielsen, C.B.; Schroeder, B.C.; McCulloch, I. The role of chemical design in the performance of organic semiconductors. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Y.; Huang, X.; Ding, K.; Sreriff, H.K.M., Jr.; Ye, L.; Liu, H.; Li, C.Z.; Ade, H.; Forrest, S.R. Non-fullerene acceptor organic photovoltaics with intrinsic operational lifetimes over 30 years. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, L.; Wei, Z.; Yi, Y. Exciton Binding Energies in Organic Photovoltaic Materials: A Theoretical Perspective. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, W.; Yang, Z.; Ding, J.; Kong, J.; Li, X. Improving water-resistance of inverted flexible perovskite solar cells via tailoring the top electron-selective layers. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 238, 111609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Q.; Gerling, L.G.; Bernal-Texca, F.; Toudert, J.; Li, T.; Zhan, X.; Martorell, J. Light harvesting at oblique incidence decoupled from transmission in organic solar cells exhibiting 9.8% efficiency and 50% visible light transparency. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1904196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alizadeh, A.; Roudgar-Amoli, M.; Bonyad-Shekalgourabi, S.M.; Shariatinia, Z.; Mahmoudi, M.; Saadat, F. Dye sensitized solar cells go beyond using perovskite and spinel inorganic materials: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 112047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zou, J.; Tang, Y.; Baryshnikov, G.; Yang, Z.; Mao, R.; Feng, W.; Guan, J.; Li, C.; Xie, Y. Porphyrins containing a tetraphenylethylene-substituted phenothiazine donor for fabricating efficient dye sensitized solar cells with high photovoltages. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 1320–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, K.; Liu, S.; Wu, Y.; Ruan, B.; Guo, J.; Wu, M. N-doped W2C derived from polyoxotungstate precursors by pyrolysis along the temperature gradient as Pt-free counter electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 236, 111503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, J.H.; Kim, D.H.; So, J.H.; Koo, H.J. Toward Eco-Friendly Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs): Natural Dyes and Aqueous Electrolytes. Energies 2022, 15, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cai, K.; Wu, H.; Hua, T.; Liao, C.; Tang, H.; Wang, L.; Cao, D. Molecular engineering of the fused azacycle donors in the D-A-π-A metal-free organic dyes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Dyes Pigments 2022, 197, 109922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baptayev, B.; Kim, S.M.; Bolatbeck, B.; Lee, S.H.; Balanay, M.P. The effect of coupling and di-anchoring group in the performance of triphenylamine-based dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Dyes Pigments 2022, 198, 110020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jilakian, M.; Ghaddar, T.H. Eco-Friendly Aqueous Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell with a Copper (I/II) Electrolyte System: Efficient Performance under Ambient Light Conditions. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chiba, Y.; Islam, A.; Watanabe, Y.; Komiya, R.; Koide, N.; Han, L. Dye-sensitized solar cells with conversion efficiency of 11.1%. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, l638–l640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Calogero, G.; Di Marco, G.; Cazzanti, S.; Caramori, S.; Argazzi, R.; Di Carlo, A.; Bignozzi, C.A. Efficient dye-sensitized solar cells using red turnip and purple wild Sicilian prickly pear fruits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martinez, A.R.H.; Estevez, M.; Vargas, S.; Quintanilla, F.; Rodriguez, R. New dye-sensitized solar cells obtained from extracted bracts of Bougainvillea glabra and spectabilis betalain pigments by different purification processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 12, 5565–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Calogero, G.; Yum, H.J.; Sinopoli, A.; Di Marco, G.; Gratzel, M.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Anthocyanins and betalains as light-harvesting pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy 2012, 86, 1563–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garcia, C.G.; Polo, A.S.; Iha, N.Y.M. Fruit extracts and ruthenium polypridinic dyes for sensitization of TiO2 in photoelectrochemical solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2003, 160, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yamazaki, E.; Murayama, M.; Nishikawa, N.; Hashimoto, N.; Shoyama, M.; Kurita, O. Utilization of natural carotenoids as photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy 2007, 81, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hemmatzadeh, R.; Mohammadi, A. Improving optical absorptivity of natural dyes for fabrication of efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2013, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kang, E.J.; Campbell, R.E.; Bastian, E.; Drake, M.A. Invited review: Annatto usage and bleaching in dairy foods. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 3891–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Islam, S.; Rather, L.J.; Mohammad, F. Phytochemistry, biological activities and potential of annatto in natural colorant production for industrial applications—A review. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gómez-Ortíz, N.M.; Vázquez-Maldonado, I.A.; Pérez-Espadas, A.R.; Mena-Rejón, G.J.; Azamar-Barrios, J.Á.; Oskam, G. Dye-sensitized solar cells with natural dyes extracted from achiote seeds. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dias, V.M.; Pilla, V.; Alves, L.P.; Oliveira, H.P.M.; Munin, E. Optical Characterization in Annatto and Commercial Colorific. J. Fluoresc. 2011, 21, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Satyanarayana, A.; Rao, P.P.; Rao, D. Chemistry, Processing and Toxicology of Annatto (Bixa orellana L.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 40, 131–141. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yabiku, H.Y.; Takahashi, M.Y.; Caruso, M.F.S.; Menezes, C.A.S. Subsídios para o estabelecimento de metodologia para o controle de corantes naturais nos alimentos. Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz 1986, 46, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kippelen, B.; Brédas, J.L. Organic photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brédas, J.L.; Norton, J.E.; Cornil, J.; Coropceanu, V. Molecular Understanding of Organic Solar Cells: The Challenges. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1691–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Perdew, J.P. Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822–8824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Becke, A.D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1993, 38, 3098–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yanai, T.; Tew, D.P.; Handy, N.C. A new hybrid exchange–correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215–251. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133–A1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Casida, M.E.; Huix-Rotllant, M. Progress in time-dependent density-functional theory. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2012, 63, 287–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Risko, C.; McGehee, M.D.; Brédas, J.L. A quantum-chemical perspective into low optical-gap polymers for highly-efficient organic solar cells. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1200–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pandey, L.; Doiron, C.; Sears, J.S.; Brédas, J.L. Lowest excited states and optical absorption spectra of donor–acceptor copolymers for organic photovoltaics: A new picture emerging from tuned long-range corrected density functionals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 14243–14248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09 Revision D.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lima, I.T.; Prado, A.S.; Martins, J.B.L.; de Oliveira Neto, P.H.; Ceschin, A.M.; da Cunha, W.F.; da Silva Filho, D.A. Improving the Description of the Optical Properties of Carotenoids by Tuning the Long-Range Corrected Functionals. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120, 4944–4950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lima, I.T.; Sousa, L.; Freitas, R.S.; Ribeiro Junior, L.A.; de Sousa Junior, R.T.; da Silva Filho, D.A. A DFT study of a set of natural dyes for organic electronics. J. Mol. Model. 2017, 23, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kertész, M. Bond length alternation and energy gap in (CH)x. Application of the intermediate exciton formalism. Chem. Phys. 1979, 44, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Brédas, J.L. Relationship between band gap and bond length alternation in organic conjugated polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 3808–3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kahn, A.; Koch, N.; Gao, W. Electronic structure and electrical properties of interfaces between metals and π-conjugated molecular films. J. Polym. Sci. B 2003, 41, 2529–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kulkarni, A.P.; Tonzola, C.J.; Babel, A.; Jenekhe, S.A. Electron Transport Materials for Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4556–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Marder, S.R.; Perry, J.W. Molecular materials for second-order nonlinear optical applications. Adv. Mater. 1993, 5, 804–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marder, S.R.; Cheng, L.T.; Tiemann, B.G.; Friedli, A.C.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Perry, J.W.; Skindhoj, J. Large First Hyperpolarizabilities in Push-Pull Polyenes by Tuning of the Bond Length Alternation and Aromaticity. Science 1994, 263, 511–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bishop, D.M.; Champagne, B.; Kirtman, B. Relationship between static vibrational and electronic hyperpolarizabilities of π-conjugated push–pull molecules within the two-state valence-bond charge-transfer model. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 9987–9994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meyers, F.; Marder, S.R.; Pierce, B.M.; Brédas, J.L. Electric Field Modulated Nonlinear Optical Properties of Donor-Acceptor Polyenes: Sum-Over-States Investigation of the Relationship between Molecular Polarizabilities (.alpha., .beta., and .gamma.) and Bond Length Alternation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10703–10714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Labidi, N.S.; Djebaili, A.; Rouina, I. Substitution effects on the polarizability (α) and first hyperpolarizability (β) of all-trans hexatriene. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2011, 15, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Reith, J.F.; Gielen, J.W. Properties of bixin and norbixin and the composition of annatto extracts. J. Food Sci. 1971, 36, 861–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the lattice structure of bixin, isobixin, norbixin, and isonorbixin.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the lattice structure of bixin, isobixin, norbixin, and isonorbixin.
Molecules 27 02138 g001
Figure 2. Optimized geometries of the bixin, isobixin, norbixin, and isonorbixin in chloroform solution. These geometries were obtained within the framework of the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Figure 2. Optimized geometries of the bixin, isobixin, norbixin, and isonorbixin in chloroform solution. These geometries were obtained within the framework of the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Molecules 27 02138 g002
Figure 3. Examined single and double bonds to determine the BLA value.
Figure 3. Examined single and double bonds to determine the BLA value.
Molecules 27 02138 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO (left) and LUMO (right) of the molecular dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory.
Molecules 27 02138 g004
Figure 5. Absorption spectra of the molecular dyes in (a) gas phase and (b) chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
Figure 5. Absorption spectra of the molecular dyes in (a) gas phase and (b) chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
Molecules 27 02138 g005
Table 1. Total BLA values (Å) in the gas phase ( ϵ = 1.00) and chloroform ( ϵ = 4.71) solution, which were determined by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
Table 1. Total BLA values (Å) in the gas phase ( ϵ = 1.00) and chloroform ( ϵ = 4.71) solution, which were determined by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
FunctionalBixinIsobixinNorbixinIsonorbixin
gas
B3LYP0.0770.0760.0760.074
CAM-B3LYP0.1010.1000.1000.100
M060.0800.0790.0790.079
chloroform
B3LYP0.0730.0720.0730.072
CAM-B3LYP0.0980.0970.0980.097
M060.0770.0760.0760.076
Table 2. Frontier HOMO/LUMO MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
Table 2. Frontier HOMO/LUMO MOs and gap energy values for the dyes in chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
FunctionalHOMO (eV)LUMO (eV)Gap (eV)
bixin
B3LYP−5.221−3.0732.148
CAM-B3LYP−6.360−1.8534.507
M06−5.428−2.8892.538
isobixin
B3LYP−5.220−3.0992.121
CAM-B3LYP−6.353−1.8794.474
M06−5.426−2.9182.508
norbixin
B3LYP−5.244−3.1042.141
CAM-B3LYP−6.379−1.8794.499
M06−5.447−2.9152.532
isonorbixin
B3LYP−5.249−3.1342.115
CAM-B3LYP−6.3761.9114.465
M06−5.450−2.9482.503
Table 3. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in gas phase and chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
Table 3. Dipole moment ( μ ), average linear polarizability ( α ), and vector component of the first ( β v e c ) hyperpolarizability of the dyes in gas phase and chloroform solution. These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
Functional μ (Debye) α  ( 10 24 esu) β  ( 10 30 esu)
bixin in gas phase
B3LYP5.81116.14122.65
CAM-B3LYP5.1089.3167.83
M065.73110.94104.58
isobixin in gas phase
B3LYP6.94121.86104.85
CAM-B3LYP6.4292.3447.23
M066.75116.0786.1
norbixin in gas phase
B3LYP5.91114.3587.68
CAM-B3LYP5.3687.6651.87
M065.77109.3778.67
isonorbixin in gas phase
B3LYP2.81119.664.56
CAM-B3LYP5.2590.0124.85
M065.48113.0851.21
bixin in chloroform solution
B3LYP6.91160.85371.31
CAM-B3LYP5.73112.98144.21
M066.72151.08284.73
isobixin in chloroform solution
B3LYP8.29168.52262.47
CAM-B3LYP7.52116.2276.87
M067.92158.06195.13
norbixin in chloroform solution
B3LYP7.06159.6276.48
CAM-B3LYP6.13111.52117.24
M066.94149.76218.19
isonorbixin in chloroform solution
B3LYP6.66166.67141.87
CAM-B3LYP6.28114.4037.08
M066.53155.75111.75
Table 4. S 0 S 1 vertical transition energies ( E 01 ), wavelength ( λ 01 ), oscillator strength (f), and transition dipole moments ( μ 01 ). These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
Table 4. S 0 S 1 vertical transition energies ( E 01 ), wavelength ( λ 01 ), oscillator strength (f), and transition dipole moments ( μ 01 ). These results were obtained by employing the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set.
Molecule E 01 (eV) λ 01 (nm)f μ 01 (Debye)
xyztot
gas/B3LYP
bixin2.249551.323.363−19.8440.109−0.00319.845
isobixin2.229556.163.591−20.5361.5520.01720.594
norbixin2.249551.353.37919.883−0.6050.00419.892
isonorbixin2.229556.233.620−20.6351.344020.679
chloroform/B3LYP
bixin2.013616.073.542−21.5280.061−0.01321.528
isobixin1.994621.913.773−22.258−1.707022.323
norbixin2.0066183.54221.553−0.6520.00121.563
isonorbixin1.989623.283.7522.232−1.477022.281
gas/CAM-B3LYP
bixin2.831437.993.642−18.3930.7080.00318.407
isobixin2.805441.983.83−18.837−2.1700.02818.961
norbixin2.828438.393.64318.380−1.1650.01218.417
isonorbixin2.804442.233.79118.767−1.9720.02618.870
chloroform/CAM-B3LYP
bixin2.624472.533.802−19.520−0.762019.535
isobixin2.599477.033.97019.914−2.3930.02520.057
norbixin2.616473.923.80019.515−1.2990.00619.558
isonorbixin2.591478.543.93919.8902.1660.01820.008
gas/M06
bixin2.320534.53.391−19.6170.313−0.00919.619
isobixin2.298539.433.61220.260−1.8190.02720.342
norbixin2.317535.13.40319.650−0.7740.00619.665
isonorbixin2.301538.763.57820.168−1.6260.02520.234
chloroform/M06
bixin2.090593.123.547−21.1350.316−0.03221.137
isobixin2.069599.323.76221.789−2.0310.02621.884
norbixin2.086594.513.54721.1440.881−0.01721.163
isonorbixin2.065600.43.73221.7411.8000.01621.816
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lima, I.T.; da Silva Crispim, J.; de Sá Neto, O.P.; de Sousa Júnior, R.T.; Ribeiro Júnior, L.A.; da Silva Filho, D.A. Organic Electronics from Nature: Computational Investigation of the Electronic and Optical Properties of the Isomers of Bixin and Norbixin Present in the Achiote Seeds. Molecules 2022, 27, 2138. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules27072138

AMA Style

Lima IT, da Silva Crispim J, de Sá Neto OP, de Sousa Júnior RT, Ribeiro Júnior LA, da Silva Filho DA. Organic Electronics from Nature: Computational Investigation of the Electronic and Optical Properties of the Isomers of Bixin and Norbixin Present in the Achiote Seeds. Molecules. 2022; 27(7):2138. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules27072138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lima, Igo Tôrres, Josiel da Silva Crispim, Olimpio Pereira de Sá Neto, Rafael Timóteo de Sousa Júnior, Luiz Antônio Ribeiro Júnior, and Demétrio Antonio da Silva Filho. 2022. "Organic Electronics from Nature: Computational Investigation of the Electronic and Optical Properties of the Isomers of Bixin and Norbixin Present in the Achiote Seeds" Molecules 27, no. 7: 2138. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules27072138

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop