Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Drosophila Protein Kinase CK2: Genetics, Regulatory Complexity and Emerging Roles during Development
Previous Article in Journal
Germinated Thai Black Rice Extract Protects Experimental Diabetic Rats from Oxidative Stress and Other Diabetes-Related Consequences
Previous Article in Special Issue
The New Role for an Old Kinase: Protein Kinase CK2 Regulates Metal Ion Transport
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/ph10010002
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Phosphorylation of PDX-1 by Protein Kinase CK2 Is Crucial for Its Stability

by
Sabrina Klein
1,
Rui Meng
1,2,
Mathias Montenarh
1 and
Claudia Götz
1,*
1
Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saarland University, 66424 Homburg, Germany
2
Cancer Center of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 156 Wujiadun, Hankou, Wuhan 430045, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10(1), 2; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph10010002
Submission received: 24 November 2016 / Revised: 20 December 2016 / Accepted: 23 December 2016 / Published: 28 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue An Updated View on an Emerging Target: Selected Papers from the 8th International Conference on Protein Kinase CK2)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The homeodomain protein PDX-1 is a critical regulator of pancreatic development and insulin production in pancreatic β-cells. We have recently shown that PDX-1 is a substrate of protein kinase CK2; a multifunctional protein kinase which is implicated in the regulation of various cellular aspects, such as differentiation, proliferation, and survival. The CK2 phosphorylation site of PDX-1 is located within the binding region of the E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor protein PCIF1. To study the interaction between PDX-1 and PCIF1 we used immunofluorescence analysis, co-immunoprecipitation, GST-pull-down studies, and proximity ligation assay (PLA). For the analysis of the stability of PDX-1 we performed a cycloheximide chase. We used PDX-1 in its wild-type form as well as phosphomutants of the CK2 phosphorylation site. In pancreatic β-cells PDX-1 binds to PCIF1. The phosphorylation of PDX-1 by CK2 increases the ratio of PCIF1 bound to PDX-1. The stability of PDX-1 is extended in the absence of CK2 phosphorylation. Our results identified protein kinase CK2 as new important modulator of the stability of PDX-1.

1. Introduction

Protein kinase CK2 is a multifunctional and pleiotropic protein kinase that plays critical roles in cell differentiation, proliferation, and survival [1,2,3]. CK2 is a multi-subunit protein kinase which is generated by the association of two catalytic α- and/or α’- subunits (38–42 kDa) with a dimer of the 27 kDa non-catalytic β-subunit. Up to now CK2 is known to phosphorylate more than 400 different proteins and the number is rapidly increasing [4]. CK2 phosphorylation of proteins can modulate the subcellular localization, change DNA binding and transcription factor activities, to mention but a few [4]. There are several reports that CK2 also affects the stability or break-down of proteins [5,6,7,8,9,10].
Recently, we identified the transcription factor PDX-1 as a new substrate for protein kinase CK2 [11]. The pancreatic duodenal homeobox 1 protein (PDX-1), also known as IPF-1, IDX-1, STF-1, GSF, and IUF-1, is expressed in the region of the developing foregut that later becomes the duodenum, distal stomach, and pancreas [12,13]. As development proceeds, PDX-1 expression gets restricted to mostly the hormone-producing β and δ cells of the endocrine pancreas. Murine PDX-1 is a 284 amino acid-long protein with a central homeodomain flanked by proline-rich N- and C-terminal domains. A transactivation domain maps to the N-terminus. The homeodomain contains the DNA binding domain as well as a nuclear localization signal [14,15]. Although the function of the C-terminus is poorly understood, there is some indication that the C-terminus has an inhibitory function whereas other data showed, that the C-terminus is required for full transactivation function [16,17,18]. PDX-1 is a phosphoprotein and a number of different kinases is known to phosphorylate PDX-1 (for review see [19]). Recently, we identified two phosphorylation sites for protein kinase CK2 in the C-terminus of PDX-1, namely threonine 231 and serine 232 [11] and found that the transcription factor activity of PDX-1 is modulated by the CK2 phosphorylation. Moreover, both phosphorylation sites are in the center of the binding domain for PCIF1 (PDX-1 C terminus interacting factor 1) [20], a protein which targets PDX-1 for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [21]. PCIF1, or the human homologue SPOP (Speckle type POZ (pox virus and zinc finger protein)), acts as E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor which binds the Cullin moiety of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex to their unique substrate binding adaptor proteins [22]. In the present study, we have analyzed whether the stability of PDX-1 and its interaction with PCIF1 might be affected by the phosphorylation of CK2 within the PCIF1 binding region.

2. Results

We have previously shown that PDX-1 is a substrate for protein kinase CK2 [11]. Phosphorylation sites were identified as threonine 231 and serine 232 of mouse PDX-1. We further showed that the transcription factor activity of PDX-1 is modulated by CK2 phosphorylation. Since the CK2 phosphorylation site of PDX-1 lies in the middle of the interaction domain with the E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor protein PCIF1 we wanted to know whether the interaction with and the stability of PDX-1 might be affected by CK2 phosphorylation.
A prerequisite for a physical interaction is the co-localization of two proteins. In a first experiment we performed an in situ immunofluorescence analysis with PDX-1 and PCIF1 specific antibodies in mouse pancreatic MIN6 β-cells. Figure 1a shows the localization of PDX-1 (red) and the localization of PCIF1 (green). Merging both images (yellow color) revealed that PDX-1 and PCIF1 colocalize mostly in the nucleus. The fact that both proteins are present in the same place does not necessarily mean that they interact. In a further experiment we, therefore, performed a co-immunoprecipitation with a PDX-1 specific antibody. As there is a lower abundance of PCIF1 in β insulinoma cells ([20], and our observation), we transfected MIN6 cells with eukaryotic expression constructs for PDX-1 and PCIF1. After transfection, cell extracts were incubated with a PDX-1 specific antibody. Proteins of the immunocomplex were separated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by immunoblot analysis with a PDX-1 specific and a FLAG-tag antibody against PCIF1. The result shown in Figure 1b demonstrates that both proteins were immunoprecipitated with the PDX-1 specific antibody (lane IP).
A more refined type of analysis to study the interaction of proteins in situ, is the proximity ligation assay PLA [23]. To analyze the role of a CK2 phosphorylation of PDX-1 we inhibited the CK2 activity with the at present most specific CK2 inhibitor CX-4945 [24]. By incubating MIN6 cells for four hours in the presence of 10 µM CX-4945, CK2 activity was reduced to 20% of the activity of untreated cells (−) (Figure 2b). As the transcription factor activity of PDX-1 is glucose responsive [25] and as the interaction with PCIF1 might also be affected by glucose we used glucose concentration of 5 and 25 mM. MIN6 cells were seeded on coverslips, glucose was withdrawn from the medium for 5 h and then added again in a concentration of 5 mM (normoglucose) or 25 mM (high glucose) to stimulate glucose-dependent processes. MIN6 cells were subjected to a PLA analysis with a PDX-1 and a PCIF1 specific antibody. A positive interaction was visualized by red fluorescent dots (Figure 2c). Counting the dots in three different independent areas demonstrated that glucose had no influence on the interaction (average 177 vs. 173 dots/50 cells). However, when cells were treated with the CK2 inhibitor, the mean value decreased to 150 dots/50 cells (85%) under normoglucose and even to 79 dots/50 cells (45%) under high glucose (Figure 2d). Thus, the interaction of both proteins is significantly reduced in the presence of the CK2 inhibitor; the reduction is most obvious under high glucose conditions.
To prove that the interaction of both proteins is phosphorylation-sensitive we performed a GST-pull-down assay with wild-type and phosphomutant proteins [26]. PCIF1 is not a known CK2 substrate; by in silico scanning of the polypeptide chain no sequence with the known consensus motif for CK2 (S/TxxD/E [27]) was found. Thus, we used in vitro translated [35S]-methionine labeled PCIF1 in its wild-type form and incubated it with GST-tagged PDX-1 wild-type and the CK2-phosphodeficient (PDX-1T231A/S232A) or the CK2-phosphomimicking (PDX-1T231D/S232E) mutant. GST-tagged PDX-1 and bound PCIF1 were pulled-down with GSH sepharose, complexes were eluted and separated on an SDS polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were stained with Coomassie blue and subjected to autoradiography. The result is shown in Figure 3a. The Coomassie blue staining demonstrated that we used equal amounts of GST-PDX-1 forms. All PDX-1 variants bound to PCIF1, however, the phospho-mimicking mutant PDX-1T231D/S232E bound considerably more PCIF1. After evaluation of four independent experiments the binding capacity of the D/E mutant was calculated to be 1.5 fold better than for wild-type or the AA mutant (Figure 3b). Thus, we conclude that the CK2 phosphorylated form of PDX-1 binds better to the E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor protein PCIF1.
In the next step we asked whether binding of PDX-1 to PCIF1 might have an influence on the stability of PDX-1. To determine the stability of PDX-1 wild-type, as well as of the CK2 phosphorylation mutant PDX-1T231A/S232A, MIN6 cells were transfected with PDX-1 constructs and 30 h after transfection cells were treated with cycloheximide for an inhibition of protein synthesis. Cells were either extracted immediately (0 h) or after 3, 6, 12, or 24 h of treatment. The cell extracts were analyzed on an SDS polyacrylamide gel followed by Western blot with an anti-FLAG-tag-antibody. As shown in Figure 4a, over a time course of 24 h, wild-type PDX-1 degraded more rapidly than the mutant PDX-1T231A/S232A. The experiment was done in triplicate, the resulting bands for PDX-1 were scanned, quantified and normalized to the corresponding α-tubulin loading control. The mean ratios (PDX-1/ α-tubulin) +/- standard deviation of the densitometric quantification are shown in Figure 4b. The calculated half-life of wild-type PDX-1 was 12 h, which is in the range of published data [28,29] whereas, the half-life of mutant PDX-1T231A/S232A was about 24 h. Thus, PDX-1, which can no longer be phosphorylated by CK2, is much more stable than the corresponding wild-type form.
It was shown that PCIF1 and Cullin 3 target PDX-1 for ubiquitination [21]. Therefore, we next tested whether the CK2 phosphorylation of PDX-1 might have an influence on its proteasomal degradation. MIN6 cells were transfected with FLAG-tagged wild-type PDX-1 or with mutant PDX-1S232A/T231A for 48 h. Cells were treated with or without 5 µM MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, for another 11 h and lysed. PDX-1 protein levels were analyzed on a 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane followed by Western blotting using anti-FLAG tag and anti-α-tubulin antibodies.
As shown in Figure 4c, treatment with MG132 led to a distinct accumulation of wild-type PDX-1 protein, whereas no significant change was observed in the PDX-1 double alanine mutant protein level. After quantification of the expression of both forms from three independent experiments the increase for the wild-type protein turned out to be more than 50% (Figure 4d). This observation meant that the phosphorylation mutant was less sensitive than wild-type PDX-1 to MG132 treatment, which indicated that the non-phosphorylated form was more resistant to proteasomal degradation whereas wild-type PDX-1 was targeted for degradation by the proteasome machinery.
From these various results we conclude that CK2 phosphorylation of PDX-1 has a massive influence on the stability of PDX-1 and this phosphorylation confers susceptibility of PDX-1 protein to proteasomal degradation.

3. Discussion

Protein kinase CK2 is classified as a serine/threonine kinase with more than 400 different substrates, which indicates the pleiotropic functions of CK2 [4]. We have recently identified PDX-1 as a substrate of CK2. PDX-1 is phosphorylated by CK2 at threonine 231 and serine 232 in the C-terminus [11]. By using CK2 inhibitors as well as by using PDX-1 where the threonine and the serine residues were mutated to alanine, it was shown that the CK2 phosphorylation of PDX-1 regulates its transcription factor activity. Here, we show that CK2 phosphorylation of PDX-1 regulates its stability. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CK2 phosphorylation influences the binding of PDX-1 and PCIF1, a factor which targets PDX-1 for proteasomal degradation. Our observations are summarized in Figure 5.
The stability of some proteins, such as myc [7], ataxin-3 [30], SAG-SCFE3 ubiquitin ligase [31], PML [8], PTEN [9], VHL [10], and NKX3.1 [32], is regulated by CK2 phosphorylation. Here, we show that the use of PDX-1, which could no more be phosphorylated by CK2 resulted in an elevated stability of PDX-1. There are some other reports showing that the stability of PDX-1 is regulated by phosphorylation. PDX-1 is phosphorylated in vivo on serine 61 and/or serine 66 by glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) in pancreatic β-cells [29]. This phosphorylation targets the protein for degradation by the proteasome, which results in a decreased half-life for the PDX-1 protein. In contrast, treatment of cells with a proteasome inhibitor led to distinct accumulation of GSK3 phosphorylated PDX-1 protein at serine 61/serine 66, whereas no significant change was observed for total PDX-1 protein. PDX-1 is also phosphorylated by the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA PK) and by the mammalian sterile 20-like kinase-1 (MST1) in the N-terminus at threonine 11 [33,34]. This phosphorylation resulted in the ubiquitination and degradation of PDX-1. It is of interest that under diabetic conditions, MST1 was strongly activated in β-cells of human and mouse islets. An et al. [35] recently reported that murine PDX-1 is phosphorylated at serine 269 by the homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2). Treatment of β-cells with high glucose concentrations resulted in an enhanced phosphorylation at serine 269. It was further shown that HIPK2 phosphorylation at this site affected neither the stability of PDX-1 nor its transactivation potential. However, this phosphorylation affected the subcellular distribution of PDX-1 in MIN6 cells. The same site is also target of p38 MAPK phosphorylation [36]. p38 interacted with PDX-1 and phosphorylated the human protein at serine 268, which resulted in an increased expression and decreased ubiquitination of PDX-1. In βTC3 insulinoma cells this phosphorylation is induced upon a stimulus with glucagon like peptide GLP1 and acts as a positive regulator of PDX-1. In line with these observations we found that the PDX-1 stability was also affected by the CK2 phosphorylation of PDX-1 at threonine 231 and serine 232.
For the ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of proteins a highly controlled orchestra of activating E1 enzymes, E2 conjugating enzymes and E3 ubiquitin ligase enzymes is necessary [36]. Targeting the substrates for ubiquitin-mediated degradation is the responsibility of adaptor proteins. Murine PCIF1, or its 100% human homologue SPOP, was identified as such an adaptor protein, which bridges the Cullin 3 moiety of an E3 ligase and its substrate [22]; PDX-1 was identified as one of these PCIF1-binding substrates [20]. Zhuang et al. [37] published a characteristic PCIF1 binding consensus motif which consists of Π-π-S-S/T-S/T (Π = nonpolar, π = polar). In SRC-3, another PCIF1-binding substrate, the binding region was defined as DVSST, where the polar and nonpolar residues occur in a reversed order [38]. For the interaction of PDX-1 and PCIF1, amino acids 210–238 of mouse PDX-1 are essential amino acids [20]. When checking this region (RSSGTPSGGGGGEEPEQDCAVTSGEELLA), we noticed the sequence 229AVTS232 which is quite similar to the SRC-3 binding motif of PCIF1. The threonine and serine residue within this consensus motif are the phosphorylation sites for protein kinase CK2. We found that the binding of PDX-1 to PCIF1 was enhanced upon using phospho-mimicking mutants where T231 and S232 were exchanged by an acid residue; on the other hand, PDX-1 binds weaker to PCIF1 upon inhibition of CK2. There are several examples that binding of E3 ubiquitin ligases, like β-TRCP or FBW7, to their substrates is modulated by phosphorylation [39,40,41]. So-called phosphodegrons were also found for the PCIF1 substrates SRC-3 [38] and the ERG oncoprotein [42]; in both cases serine residues within the consensus motif are phosphorylated by CK1. The phosphorylation triggers the interaction between the E3 ligase adaptor protein PCIF1 and its substrate and thereby activates degradation.
PCIF1 is a nuclear protein with a speckled pattern of nuclear staining [20], PDX-1 and PCIF1 co-localize in the nucleus [20] and our observation). PCIF1 together with Cullin 3 mediates the ubiquitination of PDX-1 which was shown in ubiquitin overexpression systems [20,43]. Here, we have shown the influence of CK2 phosphorylation of PDX-1 upon its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation by using the proteasome inhibitor MG132 [44]. We observed that the phosphorylation mutant of PDX-1 had a significant prolonged half-life (24 h) compared with the wild-type PDX-1 (12 h). Furthermore, the wild-type PDX-1, rather than the mutant form of PDX-1, accumulated in response to treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 in β-cells. Thus, all these findings let us conclude that CK2-phosphorylated PDX-1 underwent rapid degradation in β- cells by the proteasomal pathway, further supporting the idea that modification by CK2 phosphorylation served as an important part to regulate the stability of the PDX-1 protein.
Some studies suggested a stimulatory effect of glucose on PDX-1 phosphorylation [16,22,32], whereas others showed that glucose stimulation of β-cells decreases PDX-1 phosphorylation [15]. Moreover, a decrease in C-terminal phosphorylation of PDX-1 was associated with an increase in protein stability. Here, we demonstrated a decrease in binding of PDX-1 to PCIF1 upon CK2 inhibition, which may be the reason for the enhanced stability of the phospho-deficient alanine mutant. The significance of phosphorylation of PDX-1 for the interaction is more obvious under high glucose conditions, a situation where the presence of a fully functional PDX-1 is extremely important for the regulation of insulin transcription, secretion and regulation of blood glucose homeostasis. Therefore, inhibition of CK2 seems to be an option to increase the stability of PDX-1 and subsequently, the level of insulin. A CK2 inhibitor is currently under clinical investigation for the treatment of cancer [24]. It may be an interesting question whether this inhibitor can also be used to treat Diabetes mellitus.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture and Treatment

The mouse cell line MIN6 [45] was maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) containing 5.5 mM d-glucose and 2 mM glutamine supplemented with 15% (v/i) fetal bovine serum and 100 μM β-mercaptoethanol in humidified 5% CO2/95% air at 37 °C.
The CK2 inhibitor CX-4945 (SelleckChem, Munich, Germany) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to a 10 mM stock solution, which was used to treat the cells with the given final concentration. In control experiments we used the same volume of the solvent DMSO alone. To check the stability of the PDX-1 protein, MIN6 cells were transfected with FLAG-tagged PDX-1WT or with mutant PDX-1T231A/S232A and then further incubated for 30 h. The proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany) was dissolved as 10 mM stock solution in DMSO and applied on transfected cells 48 h post transfection in a final concentration of 5 µM for 11 h.

4.2. Plasmids

Full-length mouse PDX-1 was subcloned into the mammalian expression vector p3xFLAG/CMV-7.1 (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) using the BamH1 site. PDX-1 phosphorylation mutants were generated using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. As another eukaryotic expression vector we used pcDNA3.1-PDX-1WT [11]. PDX-1WT and mutants were also ligated with the bacterial expression vector pGEX-4T-1 (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) via its BamH1 site [11]. For mammalian expression of human PCIF1 we used pFLAG-CMV-2-SPOP, a kind gift of C. H. Chung, Seoul, South Korea [46]. The cDNA of human PCIF1 was also cloned into the BamH1/Xho1 sites of pET28a. All constructs generated by cloning and mutagenesis were verified by DNA sequencing.

4.3. Extraction of Cells and Western Blot Analysis

For harvesting, cells were scraped off the plate and sedimented by centrifugation (7 min, 4 °C, 400× g). Cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed with the double volume of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium desoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecylsulfate) supplemented with the protease inhibitor cocktail completeTM (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). After lysis, cell debris was removed by centrifugation. The protein content was determined according to a modified Bradford method (BioRad, Munich, Germany). SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis was performed essentially as described [11]. PDX-1 was detected using a polyclonal antiserum from rabbit. The mouse monoclonal antibody FLAG M2 (F1804) and the mouse monoclonal antibody β-tubulin (clone DM1A) were from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany).

4.4. Co-Immunoprecipitation

For co-immunoprecipitation experiments, MIN6 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-PDX-1 and pFLAG-CMV-2-SPOP using Effectene™ according to the provider (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). 24 h after transfection, cells were extracted and 4 mg of total protein was subjected to immunoprecipitation. The cell lysates were pre-cleared twice with a mixture of protein A sepharose beads and CL 4-B sepharose beads (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) over a period of 1 h. The supernatant was incubated with a rabbit anti PDX-1 antibody for 2 h. Beads were washed four times with PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4). Bound proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer (130 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 0.02% bromophenol blue (w/v), 10% β-mercaptoethanol, 20% glycerol (v/v), and 4% SDS), and analyzed by Western blot with the M2 FLAG-antibody for PCIF1 and the polyclonal rabbit antiserum against PDX-1. Proteins were visualized by the ECL Lumilight system of Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany).

4.5. Cycloheximide Chase

MIN6 cells were either transfected with FLAG-PDX-1wt or FLAG-PDX-1T231A/S232A mutant using Effectene™ (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as recommended by the manufacturer. Thirty hours after transfection, MIN6 cells were cultured in growth medium containing 100 µg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Munich, Germany) for 0, 3, 6, 12, or 24 h. Cells were harvested and lysed with RIPA buffer as described earlier and extracts were subjected to SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis. The experiment was performed in triplicate. The PDX-1 signals were scanned and densitometrically quantified using the Quantity One (version 4.6.7.) software from BioRad (Munich, Germany). The values were normalized to an α-tubulin loading control which was analyzed on the same gel. The mean values +/- standard deviation of three independent experiments were represented in the corresponding graphs.

4.6. Immunofluorescence Analysis

MIN6 cells were seeded in a 6 cm plate on coverslips, cultured overnight, and immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described [47]. For identification of the PDX-1 protein, a rabbit polyclonal antiserum generated against the C-terminus of PDX-1 was used. PCIF1 was detected with a goat polyclonal antibody (SPOP K-13 from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Heidelberg, Germany). Secondary antibodies were goat anti rabbit AlexaFluorTM594 and donkey anti goat AlexaFluorTM488 (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Nuclei were visualized by 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. Analysis was carried out by fluorescence imaging performed on an Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

4.7. Duolink® in Situ Proximity Ligation Assay

For detection of the interaction between the PDX-1 protein and PCIF1, we used the Duolink® in situ Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA, Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Munich, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with MIN6 cells. PDX-1 was detected with the polyclonal rabbit antiserum, PCIF1 with a mouse monoclonal antibody (SPOP B-8, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Heidelberg, Germany). Detection of the interaction signals was carried out by fluorescence imaging performed on an Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

4.8. GST-Pull Down Assay

The pull-down assay was essentially done as described by Sun et al. [48]. Purified GST-tagged proteins (10 μg) were immobilized on GSH-sepharose and equilibrated with PBS-T binding buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, 1% Tween 20). Immobilized proteins were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 7.5 µL of PCIF1 product from an in vitro translation reaction. The translation from a pET28a-PCIF-1 plasmid was done as recommended by the manufacturer (Promega GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). After washing with cold PBS-T, bound proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer (65 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.01% bromophenol blue) and analyzed by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by protein staining with Coomassie blue and autoradiography.

4.9. In Vitro Phosphorylation

To determine the activity of CK2 after its inhibition, cells were treated with CX-4945 or left untreated, lysed, and the extracts were used in a kinase filter assay. In this assay we measured the incorporation rate of [32P]-phosphate into the synthetic CK2 specific substrate peptide with the sequence RRRDDDSDDD [14]. Twenty microliter kinase buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiotreitol (DTT)) containing 30 µg protein were mixed with 30 µL CK2 mix (25 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 50 μM ATP, 0.19 mM substrate peptide) containing 10 μCi/500 μl [32P]γ ATP. The mixture was spotted onto a P81 ion exchange paper. The paper was washed three times with 85 mM H3PO4. After treatment with ethanol, the paper was dried and the Čerenkov radiation was determined in a scintillation counter.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Rolf M. Schwiete Stiftung, Mannheim, Germany (project Nr. 06/2015) to C.G. and M.M. We are grateful to C.H. Chung (NRL of Protein Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Korea [46]) for giving us pFLAG-CMV-2-SPOP. The authors thank Sarah Spohrer for performing the in vitro phosphorylation assays of MIN6 extracts.

Author Contributions

M.M. and C.G. conceived and designed the experiments; S.K., R.M. and C.G. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; M.M. and C.G. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Litchfield, D.W. Protein kinase CK2: Structure, regulation and role in cellular decisions of life and death. Biochem. J. 2003, 369, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. St-Denis, N.A.; Litchfield, D.W. From birth to death: The role of protein kinase CK2 in the regulation of cell proliferation and survival. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 1817–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Trembley, J.H.; Wang, G.; Unger, G.; Slaton, J.; Ahmed, K. CK2: A key player in cancer biology. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 1858–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Meggio, F.; Pinna, L.A. One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2? FASEB J. 2003, 17, 349–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Desagher, S.; Osen-Sand, A.; Montessuit, S.; Magnenat, E.; Vilbois, F.; Hochmann, A.; Journot, L.; Antonsson, B.; Martinou, J.C. Phosphorylation of Bid by casein kinases I and II regulates its cleavage by caspase 8. Mol. Cell 2001, 8, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Krippner-Heidenreich, A.; Talanian, R.V.; Sekul, R.; Kraft, R.; Thole, H.; Ottleben, H.; Luscher, B. Targeting of the transcription factor Max during apoptosis: phosphorylation-regulated cleavage by caspase-5 at an unusual glutamic acid residue in position P1. Biochem. J. 2001, 358, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Channavajhala, P.; Seldin, D.C. Functional interaction of protein kinase CK2 and c-Myc in lymphomagenesis. Oncogene 2002, 21, 5280–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Scaglioni, P.P.; Yung, T.M.; Cai, L.F.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Kaufman, A.J.; Singh, B.; Teruya-Feldstein, J.; Tempst, P.; Pandolfi, P.P. A CK2-dependent mechanism for degradation of the PML tumor suppressor. Cell 2006, 126, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vazquez, F.; Grossman, S.R.; Takahashi, Y.; Rokas, M.V.; Nakamura, N.; Sellers, W.R. Phosphorylation of the PTEN tail acts as an inhibitory switch by preventing its recruitment into a protein complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 48627–48630. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Ampofo, E.; Kietzmann, T.; Zimmer, A.; Jakupovic, M.; Montenarh, M.; Götz, C. Phosphorylation of the von Hippel-Lindau protein (VHL) by protein kinase CK2 reduces its protein stability and affects p53 and HIF-1α mediated transcription. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2010, 42, 1729–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Meng, R.; Al-Quobaili, F.; Müller, I.; Götz, C.; Thiel, G.; Montenarh, M. CK2 phosphorylation of PDX-1 regulates its transcription factor activity. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 2481–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ashizawa, S.; Brunicardi, F.C.; Wang, X.P. PDX-1 and the pancreas. Pancreas 2004, 28, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Melloul, D. Transcription factors in islet development and physiology: Role of PDX-1 in beta-cell function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1014, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moede, T.; Leibiger, B.; Pour, H.G.; Berggren, P.; Leibiger, I.B. Identification of a nuclear localization signal, RRMKWKK, in the homeodomain transcription factor PDX-1. FEBS Lett. 1999, 461, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hessabi, B.; Ziegler, P.; Schmidt, I.; Hessabi, C.; Walther, R. The nuclear localization signal (NLS) of PDX-1 is part of the homeodomain and represents a novel type of NLS. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 263, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hani, E.H.; Stoffers, D.A.; Chevre, J.C.; Durand, E.; Stanojevic, V.; Dina, C.; Habener, J.F.; Froguel, P. Defective mutations in the insulin promoter factor-1 (IPF-1) gene in late-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Invest. 1999, 104, R41–R48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cockburn, B.N.; Bermano, G.; Boodram, L.L.; Teelucksingh, S.; Tsuchiya, T.; Mahabir, D.; Allan, A.B.; Stein, R.; Docherty, K.; et al. Insulin promoter factor-1 mutations and diabetes in Trinidad: Identification of a novel diabetes-associated mutation (E224K) in an Indo-Trinidadian family. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lu, M.; Miller, C.; Habener, J.F. Functional regions of the homeodomain protein IDX-1 required for transactivation of the rat somatostatin gene. Endocrinology 1996, 137, 2959–2967. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Al-Quobaili, F.; Montenarh, M. Pancreatic duodenal homeobox factor-1 and diabetes mellitus type 2. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 21, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Liu, A.; Desai, B.M.; Stoffers, D.A. Identification of PCIF1, a POZ domain protein that inhibits PDX-1 (MODY4) transcriptional activity. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 24, 4372–4383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Claiborn, K.C.; Sachdeva, M.M.; Cannon, C.E.; Groff, D.N.; Singer, J.D.; Stoffers, D.A. PCIF1 modulates PDX1 protein stability and pancreatic beta cell function and survival in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 3713–3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mani, R.S. The emerging role of speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) in cancer development. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 1498–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Söderberg, O.; Leuchowies, K.J.; Gullberg, M.; Janoius, M.; Weibrecht, O.; Larsson, L.G.; Landegren, U. Characterizing proteins and their interactions in cells and tissues using the in situ proximity ligation assay. Methods 2008, 45, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Siddiqui-Jain, A.; Drygin, D.; Streiner, N.; Chua, P.; Pierre, F.; O'Brien, S.E.; Bliesath, J.; Omori, M.; Huser, N.; Ho, C.; et al. CX-4945, an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of protein kinase CK2, inhibits prosurvival and angiogenic signaling and exhibits antitumor efficacy. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 10288–10298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shao, S.; Fang, Z.; Yu, X.; Zhang, M. Transcription factors involved in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of pancreatic beta cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 384, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Einarson, M.B.; Pugacheva, E.N.; Orlinick, J.R. GST Pull-down. CSH Protoc. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Meggio, F.; Marin, O.; Pinna, L.A. Substrate specificity of protein kinase CK2. Cell Mol. Biol. Res. 1994, 40, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Humphrey, R.K.; Yu, S.M.; Flores, L.E.; Jhala, U.S. Glucose regulates steady-state levels of PDX1 via the reciprocal actions of GSK3 and AKT kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 3406–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Boucher, M.J.; Selander, L.; Carlsson, L.; Edlund, H. Phosphorylation marks IPF1/PDX1 protein for degradation by glycogen synthase kinase 3-dependent mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 6395–6403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mueller, T.; Breuer, P.; Schmitt, I.; Walter, J.; Evert, B.O.; Wüllner, U. CK2-dependent phosphorylation determines cellular localization and stability of ataxin-3. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 3334–3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. He, H.; Tan, M.; Pamarthy, D.; Wang, G.; Ahmed, K.; Sun, Y. CK2 phosphorylation of SAG at Thr10 regulates SAG stability, but not its E3 ligase activity. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2007, 295, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, X.; Guan, B.; Maghami, S.; Bieberich, C.J. NKX3.1 is regulated by protein kinase CK2 in prostate tumor cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26, 3008–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lebrun, P.; Montminy, M.R.; Van, O.E. Regulation of the pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 protein by DNA-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 38203–38210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ardestani, A.; Paroni, F.; Azizi, Z.; Kaur, S.; Khobragade, V.; Yuan, T.; Frogne, T.; Tao, W.; Oberholzer, J.; Pattou, F.; et al. MST1 is a key regulator of beta cell apoptosis and dysfunction in diabetes. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. An, R.; da Silva Xavier, G.; Semplici, F.; Vakhshouri, S.; Hao, H.X.; Rutter, J.; Pagano, M.A.; Meggio, F.; Pinna, L.A.; Rutter, G.A. Pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX1) phosphorylation at serine-269 is HIPK2-dependent and affects PDX1 subnuclear localization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 399, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhou, G.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.H.; Shahi, K.M.; Lin, X.; Wu, J.; Feng, X.H.; Qin, J.; Tan, T.H.; Brunicardi, F.C. p38 MAP kinase interacts with and stabilizes pancreatic and duodenal homeobox-1. Curr. Mol. Med. 2013, 13, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhuang, M.; Calabrese, M.F.; Liu, J.; Waddell, M.B.; Nourse, A.; Hammel, M.; Miller, D.J.; Walden, H.; Duda, D.M.; Seyedin, S.N.; et al. Structures of SPOP-substrate complexes: Insights into molecular architectures of BTB-Cul3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol. Cell 2009, 36, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, C.; Ao, J.; Fu, J.; Lee, D.F.; Xu, J.; Lonard, D.; O'Malley, B.W. Tumor-suppressor role for the SPOP ubiquitin ligase in signal-dependent proteolysis of the oncogenic co-activator SRC-3/AIB1. Oncogene 2011, 30, 4350–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kumar, Y.; Shukla, N.; Thacker, G.; Kapoor, I.; Lochab, S.; Bhatt, M.L.; Chattopadhyay, N.; Sanyal, S.; Trivedi, A.K. Ubiquitin ligase, Fbw7, targets CDX2 for degradation via two phosphodegron motifs in a GSK3β-dependent manner. Mol. Cancer Res. 2016, 14, 1097–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Barbosa, S.; Carreira, S.; Bailey, D.; Abaitua, F.; O'Hare, P. Phosphorylation and SCF-mediated degradation regulate CREB-H transcription of metabolic targets. Mol. Biol. Cell 2015, 26, 2939–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cheng, Y.; Gao, W.W.; Tang, H.M.; Deng, J.J.; Wong, C.M.; Chan, C.P.; Jin, D.Y. β-TrCP-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of liver-enriched transcription factor CREB-H. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gan, W.; Dai, X.; Lunardi, A.; Li, Z.; Inuzuka, H.; Liu, P.; Varmeh, S.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, L.; Sun, Y.; et al. SPOP promotes ubiquitination and degradation of the ERG oncoprotein to suppress prostate cancer progression. Mol. Cell 2015, 59, 917–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bunce, M.W.; Boronenkov, I.V.; Anderson, R.A. Coordinated activation of the nuclear ubiquitin ligase Cul3-SPOP by the generation of phosphatidylinositol 5-phoshpate. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 8678–8686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lee, D.H.; Goldberg, A.L. Proteasome inhibitors: Valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miyazaki, J.; Araki, K.; Yamato, E.; Ikegami, H.; Asano, T.; Shibasaki, Y.; Oka, Y.; Yamamura, K. Establishment of a pancreatic beta cell line that retains glucose-inducible insulin secretion: Special reference to expression of glucose transporter isoforms. Endocrinology 1990, 127, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kwon, J.E.; La, M.; Oh, K.H.; Oh, Y.M.; Kim, G.R.; Seol, J.H.; Baek, S.H.; Chiba, T.; Tanaka, K.; Bang, O.S.; et al. BTB domain-containing speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) serves as an adaptor of Daxx for ubiquitination by Cul3-based ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 12664–12672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Faust, M.; Schuster, N.; Montenarh, M. Specific binding of protein kinase CK2 catalytic subunits to tubulin. FEBS Lett. 1999, 462, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sun, Q.; Yu, X.; Degraff, D.J.; Matusik, R.J. Upstream stimulatory factor 2, a novel FoxA1-interacting protein, is involved in prostate-specific gene expression. Mol. Endocrinol. 2009, 23, 2038–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g001 550
Figure 1. PDX-1 and PCIF1 interaction in MIN6 cells. (a) Immunofluorescence analysis of endogenous PDX-1 and PCIF1. MIN6 cells were cultured on coverslips and stained with a polyclonal rabbit antiserum against PDX-1, a goat polyclonal antiserum against PCIF1 (SPOP K-13) and DAPI for nuclei staining. As secondary antibodies, ALEXA-FluorTM488 or ALEXA-FluorTM594 were used. Immunofluorescence was analyzed using a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Magnification: 400×; and (b) co-immunoprecipitation of PDX-1 and PCIF1 from transfected MIN6 cell extracts. MIN6 cells were transfected with PDX-1 and FLAG-tagged PCIF1 for 24 h. Two mg of cell extract were precleared twice with a mixture of protein A sepharose beads and CL 4-B agarose beads over a period of 1 h. The supernatants were incubated with a rabbit PDX-1 antibody for 2 h. The immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to a polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF) membrane and analyzed by Western blot with the mouse monoclonal M2 antibody against the FLAG-tag of PCIF1 and the polyclonal rabbit antiserum against PDX-1. WE: whole cell extract (20 µg), input: 10% of cell extracts used for immunoprecipitation, C: control without antibody, IP: immunoprecipitate, two independent precipitations.
Figure 1. PDX-1 and PCIF1 interaction in MIN6 cells. (a) Immunofluorescence analysis of endogenous PDX-1 and PCIF1. MIN6 cells were cultured on coverslips and stained with a polyclonal rabbit antiserum against PDX-1, a goat polyclonal antiserum against PCIF1 (SPOP K-13) and DAPI for nuclei staining. As secondary antibodies, ALEXA-FluorTM488 or ALEXA-FluorTM594 were used. Immunofluorescence was analyzed using a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Magnification: 400×; and (b) co-immunoprecipitation of PDX-1 and PCIF1 from transfected MIN6 cell extracts. MIN6 cells were transfected with PDX-1 and FLAG-tagged PCIF1 for 24 h. Two mg of cell extract were precleared twice with a mixture of protein A sepharose beads and CL 4-B agarose beads over a period of 1 h. The supernatants were incubated with a rabbit PDX-1 antibody for 2 h. The immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to a polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF) membrane and analyzed by Western blot with the mouse monoclonal M2 antibody against the FLAG-tag of PCIF1 and the polyclonal rabbit antiserum against PDX-1. WE: whole cell extract (20 µg), input: 10% of cell extracts used for immunoprecipitation, C: control without antibody, IP: immunoprecipitate, two independent precipitations.
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g001
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g002 550
Figure 2. Influence of glucose and CK2 inhibitor CX-4945 on the interaction of PDX-1 and PCIF1. (a) Chemical structure of CX-4945 (Silmitasertib); (b) in vitro phosphorylation assay in the absence and presence of CX-4945. MIN6 were treated with DMSO as control (0 µM) or with 10 µM CX-4945 for 24 h. Kinase activity of CK2 in the cell extracts was measured with the synthetic CK2 specific peptide substrate, RRRDDDSDDD, in the presence of [32P]γATP. Results from three individual experiments are shown; the activity in the control cells was set to 100%; (c) Duolink® in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) of PDX-1 and PCIF1 in MIN6 cells. MIN6 cells were incubated with 5 mM or 25 mM glucose for 4 h after 5 h starvation and simultaneously with 10 µM CX-4945 (+) or an equal volume DMSO for control (−). Cells were subjected to Duolink® in situ proximity ligation assay using antibodies against PDX-1 (polyclonal rabbit antiserum) and PCIF1 (mouse monoclonal antibody SPOP B-8). Immunofluorescence was analyzed using a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany); and (d) quantification of the interaction. Single dots were counted in 50 cells of three different areas. Experiments in the absence of CX-4945 were used as reference (100%). The bar graph shows the median results of three independent counts.
Figure 2. Influence of glucose and CK2 inhibitor CX-4945 on the interaction of PDX-1 and PCIF1. (a) Chemical structure of CX-4945 (Silmitasertib); (b) in vitro phosphorylation assay in the absence and presence of CX-4945. MIN6 were treated with DMSO as control (0 µM) or with 10 µM CX-4945 for 24 h. Kinase activity of CK2 in the cell extracts was measured with the synthetic CK2 specific peptide substrate, RRRDDDSDDD, in the presence of [32P]γATP. Results from three individual experiments are shown; the activity in the control cells was set to 100%; (c) Duolink® in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) of PDX-1 and PCIF1 in MIN6 cells. MIN6 cells were incubated with 5 mM or 25 mM glucose for 4 h after 5 h starvation and simultaneously with 10 µM CX-4945 (+) or an equal volume DMSO for control (−). Cells were subjected to Duolink® in situ proximity ligation assay using antibodies against PDX-1 (polyclonal rabbit antiserum) and PCIF1 (mouse monoclonal antibody SPOP B-8). Immunofluorescence was analyzed using a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany); and (d) quantification of the interaction. Single dots were counted in 50 cells of three different areas. Experiments in the absence of CX-4945 were used as reference (100%). The bar graph shows the median results of three independent counts.
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g002
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g003 550
Figure 3. Interaction of PDX-1 and PCIF1 as a function of CK2 phosphorylation. (a) GST pull-down analysis of the PCIF1/PDX-1 interaction. About 10 µg GST-PDX-1WT, GST-PDX-1T231A/S232A, or GST-PDX-1T231D/S232E were incubated with 7.5 µL of in vitro translated and [35S]-methionine labeled PCIF1 protein. The formed complex was coupled to GSH sepharose. Proteins eluted from the affinity resins were analyzed on a 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel, stained with Coomassie blue and afterwards subjected to autoradiography; and (b) after densitometric analysis of the PDX-1 and PCIF1 signals the PCIF1/PDX-1 ratio was calculated and the relative values were presented as bar graphs referred to the interaction of wild-type PDX-1 and PCIF1.
Figure 3. Interaction of PDX-1 and PCIF1 as a function of CK2 phosphorylation. (a) GST pull-down analysis of the PCIF1/PDX-1 interaction. About 10 µg GST-PDX-1WT, GST-PDX-1T231A/S232A, or GST-PDX-1T231D/S232E were incubated with 7.5 µL of in vitro translated and [35S]-methionine labeled PCIF1 protein. The formed complex was coupled to GSH sepharose. Proteins eluted from the affinity resins were analyzed on a 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel, stained with Coomassie blue and afterwards subjected to autoradiography; and (b) after densitometric analysis of the PDX-1 and PCIF1 signals the PCIF1/PDX-1 ratio was calculated and the relative values were presented as bar graphs referred to the interaction of wild-type PDX-1 and PCIF1.
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g003
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g004 550
Figure 4. Stability of PDX-1WT and PDX-1T231A/S232A in MIN6 cells. (a) MIN6 cells were transfected with FLAG-PDX-1WT or the double mutant FLAG-PDX-1T231A/S232A. Thirty hours post transfection, cells were treated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) to inhibit the protein synthesis. Cells were either extracted immediately (0 h) or after 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of treatment. The cell extract was analyzed on a 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane followed by Western blotting with anti-FLAG tag- and anti-α-tubulin- antibodies. α-tubulin was used as a loading control. One representative blot out of three is shown; (b) densitometric quantification of the PDX-1 protein after normalization to the loading control at each time point. Mean ± S.D. stands for three independent experiments; (c) MIN6 cells transiently transfected with plasmids encoding FLAG-PDX-1WT or FLAG-PDX-1S232A/T231A were treated 48 h post transfection with (+) or without (−) 5 µM MG132 for 11 h. Cells were then lysed and the whole cell extracts were analyzed by Western blotting using anti FLAG-tag and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. α-tubulin was analyzed as a loading control. A quantification of the relative FLAG-PDX-1 protein level (FLAG-PDX-1/α-tubulin) is shown in (d). The results were the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.
Figure 4. Stability of PDX-1WT and PDX-1T231A/S232A in MIN6 cells. (a) MIN6 cells were transfected with FLAG-PDX-1WT or the double mutant FLAG-PDX-1T231A/S232A. Thirty hours post transfection, cells were treated with 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) to inhibit the protein synthesis. Cells were either extracted immediately (0 h) or after 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of treatment. The cell extract was analyzed on a 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane followed by Western blotting with anti-FLAG tag- and anti-α-tubulin- antibodies. α-tubulin was used as a loading control. One representative blot out of three is shown; (b) densitometric quantification of the PDX-1 protein after normalization to the loading control at each time point. Mean ± S.D. stands for three independent experiments; (c) MIN6 cells transiently transfected with plasmids encoding FLAG-PDX-1WT or FLAG-PDX-1S232A/T231A were treated 48 h post transfection with (+) or without (−) 5 µM MG132 for 11 h. Cells were then lysed and the whole cell extracts were analyzed by Western blotting using anti FLAG-tag and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. α-tubulin was analyzed as a loading control. A quantification of the relative FLAG-PDX-1 protein level (FLAG-PDX-1/α-tubulin) is shown in (d). The results were the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g004
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g005 550
Figure 5. Model of the PDX-1-PCIF1 interaction (a) CK2 phosphorylates mouse PDX-1 at threonine 231 and serine 232. This site is located in the middle of a phosphodegron, which binds the E3 ubiquitin ligase protein PCIF1 in a phosphorylated form. PCIF1 targets PDX-1 to the proteasome where it is ubiquitinated and subsequently degraded; and (b) upon CK2 inhibition, T231 and S232 of PDX-1 are not phosphorylated. As these important residues of the phosphodegron are not phosphorylated, the interaction with PCIF1 is reduced and PDX-1 is more stable.
Figure 5. Model of the PDX-1-PCIF1 interaction (a) CK2 phosphorylates mouse PDX-1 at threonine 231 and serine 232. This site is located in the middle of a phosphodegron, which binds the E3 ubiquitin ligase protein PCIF1 in a phosphorylated form. PCIF1 targets PDX-1 to the proteasome where it is ubiquitinated and subsequently degraded; and (b) upon CK2 inhibition, T231 and S232 of PDX-1 are not phosphorylated. As these important residues of the phosphodegron are not phosphorylated, the interaction with PCIF1 is reduced and PDX-1 is more stable.
Pharmaceuticals 10 00002 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klein, S.; Meng, R.; Montenarh, M.; Götz, C. The Phosphorylation of PDX-1 by Protein Kinase CK2 Is Crucial for Its Stability. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph10010002

AMA Style

Klein S, Meng R, Montenarh M, Götz C. The Phosphorylation of PDX-1 by Protein Kinase CK2 Is Crucial for Its Stability. Pharmaceuticals. 2017; 10(1):2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph10010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klein, Sabrina, Rui Meng, Mathias Montenarh, and Claudia Götz. 2017. "The Phosphorylation of PDX-1 by Protein Kinase CK2 Is Crucial for Its Stability" Pharmaceuticals 10, no. 1: 2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph10010002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop