Next Article in Journal
NADPH–Cytochrome P450 Reductase Mediates the Fatty Acid Desaturation of ω3 and ω6 Desaturases from Mortierella alpina
Next Article in Special Issue
Ascorbic Acid Ameliorates Cardiac and Hepatic Toxicity Induced by Azithromycin-Etoricoxib Drug Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
Revealing Potential Bioactive Compounds and Mechanisms of Lithospermum erythrorhizon against COVID-19 via Network Pharmacology Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Structure-Based Screening of the Constituents of Calotropis procera Identifies Potential Inhibitors of Diabetes Mellitus Target Alpha Glucosidase
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antidiabetic Drug Sitagliptin with Divalent Transition Metals Manganese and Cobalt: Synthesis, Structure, Characterization Antibacterial and Antioxidative Effects in Liver Tissues

1
Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Biological Sciences, Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdul-Aziz University, P.O. Box 80200, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
3
Biotechnology Department, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Jeddah, P.O. Box 80327, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(5), 1810-1827; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cimb44050124
Submission received: 21 March 2022 / Revised: 9 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 20 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products as Potential Sources of Antidiabetic Compounds)

Abstract

:
Metals and their complexes have an increasing number of medical applications. Sitagliptin (STG) acts as an antidiabetic drug. Mn(II) and Co(II) complexes were studied and characterized based on physical characterization, FT-IR, DG/TG, XRD, ESM, and TEM. Data revealed that STG acts as a bidentate ligand through the oxygen atom of a carbonyl group and the nitrogen atom of an amino group. Magnetic measurement data revealed that the Mn/STG metal complex has a square planner geometry. The experiment was performed on 40 male albino rats who were divided into four groups: the control group, STG group, group treated with STG/Mn, and group treated with Co/STG. Biomarkers for hepatic enzymes and antioxidants were found in the blood, and hepatic tissue histology was evaluated. STG in combination with Mn and Co administration showed potent protective effects against hepatic biochemical alterations induced by STG alone, as well as suppressing oxidative stress and structural alterations. These complexes prevented any stress and improved hepatic enzymatic levels more than STG alone. The STG/Mn complex was highly effective against Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus pneumonia, while STG/Co was highly effective against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureas. Therefore, STG combined with Mn and Co produced a synergistic effect against oxidative stress and improved the histological structure of the liver tissues. STG metal complexes with Mn and Co showed the most potential ameliorative antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects.

1. Introduction

Sitagliptin (STG) was the first dipeptedyl peptidase-4 inhibitor approved by the FDA for the management and treatment of type II diabetes mellitus [1]. It is broadly used as an adjuvant therapy to current treatment [2]. STG has been shown to inhibit the expression of inflammatory mediators and suppress NF-κB activation. Previous Japanese reports and some international reports (MEDLINE) have linked STG treatment to an increase in hepatic transaminases [3].
STG is the first gliptin-based agent approved in the USA in 2006 and Europe in 2009. Additionally, STG has the advantage of being an anti-inflammatory agent [4,5].
STG was developed as a new type II diabetes mellitus therapeutic option. STG is a type of antidiabetic agent that was only recently approved for diabetes treatment [6]. In addition to regulating incretins, STG has various functions in different organs [6].
Dipeptedyl Peptidase-4 is also involved in the development of chronic hepatitis-C (HIV) [7,8]. Additionally, serum dipeptedyl peptidase-4 activity was found to be increased in tetrachloromethane-induced cirrhotic rats [9]. Dipeptedyl peptidase-4 categories are highly expressed in the liver and are involved in the fibronectin-mediated interaction of hepatocytes with ECM [10,11]. However, the effect of STG on the advancement of liver fibrosis is still unknown. The hepatic tissues highly express dipeptedyl peptidase-4, and recently dipeptedyl peptidase-4 drugs were suggested to be involved in the development of many chronic hepatic diseases, carcinoma, and even fatty liver [10].
The peptidase activity of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 exerts pleiotropic effects on many organs. Recent data have suggested that STG plays a role in the development of fatty liver diseases, chronic liver diseases, and hepatocellular carcinoma [11]. STG is a relatively new generation of antidiabetic drug that inhibits dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzymatic activity, resulting in continuous rapid degradation of GLP-1 [12].
The high expression of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 in many tissues, including lymphocytes, has raised the effectiveness of STG, particularly on immunological functions [13]. As is well known, STG is used to treat patients with diabetes mellitus, and the nature of the disorder itself increases the risk of many organ-related complications, confirming the observed hepatic structural alterations induced after STG treatments.
Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 by gliptins prolongs endogenous glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) activity, lowering blood glucose levels in diabetic patients [14].
Patients with type II diabetes mellitus have a twofold increased chance of developing hepatic fibrosis or hepatocellular carcinoma compared to the general population. Additionally, the risk of dying from hepatic fibrosis is doubled in patients with type II diabetes mellitus [15].
Hepatic STG expression in the liver may be directly associated with hepatic lipogenesis and liver injury. STG, an oral antihyperglycemic agent, inactivates the hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GIP released in response to meals. STG increases insulin secretion and suppresses glucagon, which lowers blood glucose levels by preventing GLP-1 and GIP breakdown [16].
A previous study demonstrated that novel synthesized Mg, Cr, Cu, Ca, Zn, and Se/STG complexes significantly improved insulin secretion and the pancreatic and glycometabolic functions and succeeded in controlling high fat diet-induced diabetes mellitus in rats. It showed that there were great differences in the biochemical and histological findings obtained from the diabetic rats orally receiving STG and those receiving STG–metal complexes, and there was improved insulin secretion of diabetic rats than in the ones given STG only and enhanced antioxidant capacities after the induction of experimental diabetes mellitus in male rats and alleviated complications of diabetic rats than STG alone [5].
Carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen elemental analysis; infrared spectroscopy, molar conductance measurement, and magnetic moment were used to investigate STG complexity. The spectroscopic results suggested octahedral structures for prepared Ni–STG complexity. The chemical structure of STG complexity was elucidated by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). This study is aimed at synthesizing Mn(II) and Co(II) STG complexes and testing their hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects besides antibacterial activity of the two synthesized complexes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Chemicals that were obtained from commercial suppliers (Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland) or Merck Chemical Company (Buchs, Switzerland)) and used as supplied were used without further purification. STG (C16H15F6N5O; 407.31 g/mol) [purity 98%; Metals(II) chlorides] was obtained from Fluka (purity 98%).

2.2. Preparation of Divalent Metal STG Complexity

Each STG ligand (0.02 mol, 8.15 g) dissolved in 25 mL CH3OH was combined with divalent Mn+2 (0.01 mol, 1.26 g) for first solution mixture and Co+2 (0.01 mol, 1.30 g) dissolved in 50 mL CH3OH for second solution mixture and then stirred with refluxing for 2 h for each mixture. The produced precipitates were separated by evaporating the precipitated solution to 1/2 of its original volume (v), resulting in a brownish-white precipitate for Mn+2 and a pale-yellow precipitate for Co+2. For the complexes, filtration, multiple washing with MeOH solvent, and drying at 60 °C with a vacuum desiccator over anhydrous CaCl2 were carried out and chemically characterized by different instruments as shown in Table 1.

2.2.1. Compound 1 (Mn+2 Complex)

Yield (70%), m.p. > 300 °C; color: brownish; molar conductivity (Λm(μS)): 68 ohm−1 cm2 mol−1. Elemental analysis for [Mn(STG)2]. Cl2, MnC32H30N10Cl2F12O2, (940.48 g/mol): calcd. (Found)%C 40.87 (40.22), %H 3.22 (3.01), %N 14.89 (14.53), %Cl 7.54 (7.53), and %Mn 5.84 (6.68); IR values in cm−1 using KBr tablets: 3330 ν (NH), 1637 ν (C=O), 1633 ν (C=N)imine, 1512 ν (NH), 1333, 1269, 1140 ν (C–F), 660 ν (Mn–O), 560 ν (Mn–N), UV–Vis. (1 cm quartz cells, DMSO) 203, 260 nm.

2.2.2. Compound 2 (Co+2 Complex)

Yield (70%), m.p. > 300 °C; color: pale-yellow; molar conductivity (Λm (μS)): 67 ohm−1 cm2 mol−1. Elemental analysis for [Co(STG)2]. Cl2, CoC32H30Cl2F12N10O2, (944.47 g/mol): calcd. (Found)%C 40.69 (40.32), %H 3.20 (3.05), %N 14.83 (14.63), %Cl 7.51 (7.63), and %Co 6.24 (6.78). IR values in cm−1 using KBr tablets: 3331 ν (NH), 1638 ν (C=O), 1633 ν (C=N) imine, 1510 ν (NH), 1332, 1270, 1139 ν (C–F), 661 ν (Co–O), 558 ν (Co–N), UV–Vis. (1 cm quartz cells, DMSO) 202, 261 nm.
The melting point of complexes was measure via A melting point apparatus which is a scientific instrument used to determine the melting point of complexes, Fisher-Johns apparatus, Gallenkamp (electronic) melting point apparatus, and automatic melting point apparatus.

2.3. In Vitro Release Profile of STG/Mn and STG/Co Complexes

The release profile of STG/Mn and STG/Co complexes were studied by using two compartment diffusion cells separated by a cellulose membrane of molecular weight cut-off = 12.000. A total of 3 mg of the prepared complexes were suspended in the donor compartment in 1 mL slightly basic PBS, whereas the receiver compartment contained PBS and was left shaking at 37 °C for about 8 h. The amount of both complexes released from the dialysis bag was determined at different intervals by measuring the absorbance values at 390 nm. All the measurements were done in triplicates [17].

2.4. Sample Handling for Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS)

Preparation of the sample is the most important step in the analysis and involves simple dilution to total dissolution including wet decomposition of the solid sample using thermal, ultrasonic, or radiant infrared energy, where the brand/model for flame atomic absorption instrument is Perkin Elmer Analyst 400. A typical sample preparation procedure for solid and viscous liquid samples involves digestion with a concentrated acid, for example, HNO3, HCl, or H2SO4. After dilution of the digested solutions, samples can be directly injected into flame AAS as well as graphite furnace AAS.
For solid samples, many steps are required, including sampling, subsampling, grinding, and dissolution. The risk of contamination is higher than in the case of liquid samples. Sample preparation can be performed with parts per million (ppm) as concentration unit; it is necessary to add reagents to the solid sample and apply enough energy to break some present in solids. It is possible to use complementary reagents to prepare solid sample in solution using wet decomposition [18,19].

Wet Dissolution

Oxidizing agents were used to decompose solid organic samples. Concentrated acids such as HNO3, HCl, H2SO4, and H3PO4 are used with one normal and make heating where the acid acts as complexing and oxidizing power, its boiling point safety and purity. The boiling point of the acid for open vessel decomposition controls the maximum temperature to be used to overcome high acid consumption and possible losses of the volatile contents [18,19]. Perchloric acid, if used, should never be more concentrated than 72% in the presence of organic matter due to the risk of explosion. The experiment can be performed using different types of energy such as thermal, ultrasonic, and radiant energy. Liquid samples are aspirated and introduced into the flame using a spray chamber that makes breaking for the aspirated liquid and changes it into fine droplets.

2.5. Experimental Model

Forty adult male albino rats weighing 140 g were maintained in metal cages in a pathogen-free environment with adequate ventilation. The animals were fed a healthy diet. During the experiments, every effort was taken to make the animals as comfortable as possible. The experimental protocol was approved by the Taif University Ethical Committee (approval number: 42-0074) and followed international guidelines on animal use and care. The animals were provided with food and water ad libitum (Figure 1).

2.6. Drugs and Chemicals

STG in the form of JANUVIA® 100 tablets was obtained from Merck Sharp and Dohme Ltd. (Pavia, Italy). Each tablet was ground and dissolved in 10 mL carboxymethyl cellulose solution (0.5%) and subsequently shaken to achieve a suspension form (10 mg/mL).

2.7. Experimental Design

The animals (2 months old) were divided into four treatment groups. All treatments were administered orally for 30 successive days (4 weeks). Control group (I) received normal physiological saline solution (0.9%) with gum acacia as a vehicle; group (II) received STG [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA (10 mg kg−1)] [5]; group (III) received STG/Mn(II) (10 mg/kg); and group (IV) received STG/Co(II) at recommended doses, all treatment combined with gum acacia (carrier Vehicle). The treatment protocol is shown in Figure 2.

2.7.1. Blood Samples

After the end of the experiment, blood samples were taken from the rat eye plexus and separated into two parts. One part was added to tubes with EDTA to obtain plasma, and the other part was added to EDTA-free tubes centrifuged at 5000× g rpm for 15 min to obtain serum. Both samples were used for different biochemical analyses.

2.7.2. Hepatic Function Activities and Biomarkers

ALT, AST, and ALP levels were assessed by using (SENTINEL CH) kits. LDH levels were measured in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7.3. Preparation of Hepatic Tissue Homogenates for the Determination of the Redox State

Small liver portion from hepatic tissues were used to determine oxidative injury. The hepatic tissues were immersed in a 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4), added with protease inhibitor to protect the enzymes from oxidation, and centrifuged to obtain the supernatant of tissue homogenates of brain and testicular tissues.

2.7.4. Determination of Oxidative Stress Biomarker Activities in Hepatic Tissues

MDA level was determined following the method of Ohkawa et al. (1979) [20]. SOD activity was determined using the technique of Marklund and Marklund (1974) [21]. CAT activity was estimated by applying the method of Aebi (1984) [22]. GRx was determined following Couri and Abdel-Rahman (1980) [23]. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) was assayed using the technique of Hafeman et al. (1974) [24].

2.7.5. Histological Changes

Small hepatic tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for further histological examination [25].

2.8. Antibacterial Activities of STG and Its Metal Complexes

The antimicrobial activity of the tested samples was determined by a modification of the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method [26]. Antibacterial activity was tested in triplicate, and then the mean was calculated. In brief, 100 μL of the best bacteria were grown in 10 mL of fresh media until they reached a count of approximately 108 cells/mL [27]. Then, 100 μL of the microbial suspension was spread onto agar plates corresponding to the broth in which they were maintained. Isolated colonies of each organism that may play a pathogenic role were selected from the primary agar plates and tested for susceptibility by the disc diffusion method [28].
Plates were inoculated at 25 °C for 48 h. The Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis and the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia Coli were incubated at 35–37 °C for 24–48 h. Afterward, the diameters of the inhabitation zones were measured in millimeters [29]. Standard discs of tetracycline (antibacterial agent) served as positive controls for the antimicrobial activity, and a filter disc impregnated with 10 μL solvent (dist. H2O, chloroform, and DMSO) was used as a negative control.
The agar used was the Mueller–Hinton agar, which was tested continuously in terms of its pH. Further, the depth of the agar in the plate was a factor considered in the disc diffusion method [29].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS software [30] and Open Epi version 2.3.1. One-way ANOVA and post hoc power were used to analyze data. p < 0.05 value was considered as significant [30].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Characterization of the STG Metal Complexes

3.1.1. Physical and Microanalytical Data

At room temperature, STG complexity had good stability and poor solubility in H2O solvent, but high solubility in organic solvents, such as DMF and DMSO. The molar conductance of the compounds 1 and 2 is 68 and 67 μs/cm, respectively. Based on electrolytic measurements of the compounds 1 and 2, Cl anions exist outside the chelation sphere and have a coordinated nature [31]. Adding AgNO3 reagent to the dissolved STG metal complexity produced a white precipitate, confirming the presence of Cl in the outer coordination sphere. The elemental analysis revealed a metal to ligand ratio of 1:2 in the divalent STG complexity.

3.1.2. Infrared (IR) Spectroscopy of STG

The following were observed in the IR spectrum of the STG-free ligand (Table 2 and Figure 3): A strong spectrum with a broad character returned to the NH2 group (N–H stretching) at 3357 cm−1 [32], medium-strong and weak bands at 3050–3000 cm−1 due to aromatic C–H stretching and υ (C–H) vibrations, a medium-strong band at 1669 cm−1 corresponding to υ (C=O) stretching, a strong band at 1580 cm−1 returned to N–H bending, and one band at 1633 cm−1, representing the υ (C=N) azomethine group. The vibrations at 1000–1275 cm−1 were due to the υ (C-F) bond [33]. Other bands appeared at 1555, 1513, 1452, 1272, 1146, 978, 880, and 844 cm−1.

3.1.3. IR Spectroscopy of STG Complexity

The following were observed in the IR spectra of STG metal complexity (Table 1 and Figure 3).
For compounds 1 and 2, the stretching vibration of the –NH2 group was displaced to lower frequency values at 3330 cm−1, 3331 cm−1, and 3335 cm−1, returning to chelation. In compounds 1 and 2 spectra, the carbonyl group [υ (C=O)] stretching at 1669 cm−1 (STG-free ligand) was shifted to a lower vibration at 1637–1640 cm−1 [33]. For the STG ligand, the band at 1633 cm−1 corresponds to the azomethine group (C=N), which is unshifted for compounds 1 and 2; therefore the azomethine group does not contribute to coordination. At 1330–1137 cm−1, the free STG revealed a band in the C–F region. After complexation, the maximum remained unchanged, indicating that the C–F bond was unlikely to be involved in complexity [33]. FTIR spectra showed small N–H region IR bands that cannot be attributed clearly to the coordination change, but easier to the H-bonding as well as the formation characteristic stretching vibrations due to N–H and C=O bonds.
The bands that emerged in the region of 666–655 cm−1 and at 548–558 cm−1 can be attributed to M–O and M–N stretching vibrations [34]. As a result of the IR spectral results, it was determined that the divalent metal ions (Mn+2 and Co+2) are coordinated with STG via amino and carbonyl groups, and STG functions as a bidentate chelate in trans form rather than cis (Figure 4) as trans structure is more stable than cis; in cis conformation, the bulky similar rings are on the same side that make steric repulsion of the rings that make cis conformation less stable than trans in which the bulky rings are far apart (on the opposite side).

3.2. XRD, SEM, and TEM Investigations

The samples of STG solid complexes were characterized at room temperature by X-ray diffraction by using Cu Kα radiation. A crystalline form of STG a powder X-ray diffraction pattern showed peaks at 2-theta of 13.7, 18.0, 22.6, 25.7, and 27.0 degrees. The nature of crystallinity for metal complexity was established by XRD, SEM, and TEM analyses. At room temperature, the compounds 1 and 2 were characterized by XRD using Cu Kα radiation. The XRD patterns of the synthesized STG complexity were crystalline. The diffractograms of compounds 1 and 2 have distinct patterns at (21.53, 24.21, 27.75, 28.65, 29.84, 31.32, 34.81, 38.92, 43.11, and 58.89 degrees) and (21.23, 24.93, 28.15, 29.45, 30.51, 32.61, 36.431, 38.32, 41.91, and 59.32 degrees) (Figure 5). A crystalline form of STG-free ligand showed. By making a comparison for compounds 1 and 2 with the X-ray patterns of Mg2+, Ca2+, Cr3+, Zn2+, Cu2+, and Se4+,STG complexes have distinct patterns at (14.94, 22.75, 25.35, 26.59, 30.27, 32.62, 40.22, 49.40, and 53.10 degrees), (22.75, 25.35, 26.61, 28.59, 30.28, 32.55, 32.96, 36.11, 40.15, 41.08, 47.42, 49.27, and 53.13), (22.43, 23.11, 25.45, 26.66, 28.67, 30.30, 32.87, 36.22, 40.17, and 53.09 degrees), (15.21, 22.75, 26.58, 28.51, 30.21, 32.75, 40.22, 49.27, and 52.96 degrees), (16.65, 21.11, 22.06, 22.54, 25.22, 26.46, 28.64, 28.64, 30.11, and 32.68 degrees), and (16.24, 19.39, 20.42, 22.54, 25.56, 26.63, 30.27, 32.68, 36.18, and 53.10 degrees), respectively. We elucidated the iso-crystalline structure for compounds 1 and 2, which could help elucidate the coordination geometry of the compounds.
The diffractograms of compounds 1 and 2 are depicted. The presence of sharp, intense, and strong Bragg’s diffraction lines in the diffractograms of STG complexity was well-characterized in nature and had a well-organized structure.
The crystalline size of the synthesized complexity was calculated using the Scherrer formula [29] D = kλ/βCosθ, where k is a constant of 0.94, λ is the wavelength of the X-ray used (0.154 nm), and β is the complete width of the XRD pattern at half maximum peak. Manganese and cobalt had crystalline sizes of 40 nm and 65 nm, respectively. The crystalline size was observed to be different for this complexity owing to changes in the metal ions.
The SEM and TEM images of the compounds 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7. The average grain length for the compounds 1 and 2 is 5–50 μm, as can be seen in this diagram. The surface morphology changed as metal ions varied, with images having a large number of irregularly shaped grains and others having uniform grains. The average grain size estimated by SEM is quite a bit larger than the average grain size estimated by XRD.

3.3. In Vitro Drug Release

To exploit the use of STG/Mn and STG/Co complexes for an effective drug delivery system, we carried out this experiment (in vitro drug release of) at different time intervals (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h), and the resulting data are shown in Figure 8. The in vitro releasing medium was chosen as slightly basic phosphate buffer. The first release was fast within the first 2 h, followed by a gradual release up until 6 h.

3.4. Hepatic Enzyme Levels

ALT, AST, and LDH were significantly elevated in the STG-treated group as compared to the control group (Table 3 and Figure 9). Meanwhile, the treatment of male rats with STG metal complexes either STG/Mn or STG/Co improved all the above parameters better than each one alone, and this returned to the functions of either Co or Mn; Mn is an essential human dietary element. It is involved in several biological processes, metabolism, and free radical defense systems; based on the obtained findings, Mn alters STG chemical structure and forms a new structural compound (STG/Mn) complex after the coordination of Mn with STG via carbonyl and amino groups, and this new formula greatly improved the hypoglycemic and hepatoprotective activities of STG.
Additionally, Co as an essential metal, which is involved in the metabolism of all animals and thus interacts with liver enzymes, and due to the role of bacteria in the stomachs of ruminant animals to convert cobalt salts into vitamin B12, Co therefore markedly improves the health. We proved this in the current finding by obtaining a new structure of STG with Co complex thus giving more characterizations to the efficacy of STG drug.

3.5. Oxidative Stress Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Biomarkers

Table 4 shows the changes in antioxidant enzyme markers in the hepatic tissues of male rats treated with STG. MDA levels of male rats are significantly elevated with all the antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GRx, and GPx) decreasing. The combination of STG with Mn and Co significantly decreased the MDA levels and improved all the antioxidant enzymes more than treatment with STG alone.
By contrast, the MDA levels in STG/Mn and STG/Co groups significantly declined compared with those in the STG-treated group. Therefore, novel complexes of STG/Mn and STG/Co improved the antioxidant defense system in the hepatic tissue homogenates (Table 4).
These biological data of these novel complexes with STG, either Mn or Co, enhanced the antioxidant capacities of the original ligand as the novel formula ameliorated the hepatic antioxidant activities. So, the use of STG in combination with vital metals such as Mn and Co was attempted to increase the antioxidant effectiveness of STG as it is know that enzymes such as glutathione and superoxide dismutase combine effectively with metals and thus increase their abilities in the scavenging of free radicals. This was clearly apparent in the high scavenging activity of STG with either Mn or Co and the reducing of the lipid peroxidation final marker “MDA” and improving the antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, and GPx).

3.6. Histological Examination

Figure 10 is a photomicrograph of hepatic tissues showing normal hepatic structure in the control group. It also shows the hepatic structure alterations with degeneration of hepatocytes and severe dilation of the central vein with marked hemorrhage and clear improvement in groups treated with combination of STG/Mn and STG/Co-treated groups. The scoring of the different treated groups is shown in Table 5.
The structure of hepatic tissues was greatly improved in groups treated with new complexes between STG and Mn and Co, and this proved their capacities in improving biochemical functions of treated groups with STG/Mn and STG/Co and also on the structural levels as clear in the histological sections of different treated groups and the scoring of different fields, and this is an important issue in proving the capacities of the novel complexes on the cellular levels.

3.7. Antibacterial Activity Evaluation

Biological evaluations were performed of the target complexes against Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus pneumonia and Staphylococcus aureus) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) bacteria. Results from the agar disc diffusion tests for the antimicrobial activities of the target compounds are presented in Table 6 and illustrated in Figure 11. The diameters of the zone of inhibition (in mm) of the standard drug Amikacin against Gram-positive bacteria B. subtilis and S. aureus and Gram-negative bacteria E. coli and P. aeruginosa were found to be 38, 32, 33, and 37 mm, respectively. Under identical conditions, Table 6 and Figure 11 show that all complexes were found to be efficient, with high antimicrobial activity.

4. Discussion

It is known that drugs generally affect liver vitality, therefore, previous literature on the subject has confirmed that STG has some adverse effects on hepatic structure and metabolism [1]. Drugs often cause unrecognized and sometimes acute liver injury [35].
STG resulted in a slight decline in both (Alanine transaminase and Aspartate transaminase) AST and ALT in clinical trials as confirmed in such drugs and xenobiotics in previous studies [36]. These results are consistent with the obtained data, as STG-treated groups elicited a significant increase in AST, ALT, and LDH when compared to the normal control group. However, these parameters were greatly improved in groups treated with STG/Mn and STG/Co complexes.
In the current study, metal complexes (Mn and Co) combined with STG resulted in significant improvements in all the aforementioned parameters as compared to the normal control group.
The results presented herein provide compelling evidence regarding the biological effects of STG on liver functions, and the novel effect of STG metal complexes on ameliorating hepatic structure in male rats. First, there were great biochemical and histological differences between the treated rats that received the STG drug alone and those that received STG metal complexes, either Co or Mn.
Manganese (Mn) is an essential human dietary element. It is present as a coenzyme in several biological processes, which include macronutrient metabolism and free radical defense systems. Manganese (Mn) is an essential element that is involved in the synthesis and activation of many enzymes and in the regulation of the metabolism of glucose and lipids in humans [37,38]. The classes of enzymes that have Mn cofactors include oxidoreductases and hydrolases. Other enzymes containing Mn are Mn-containing superoxide dismutase (MnSOD). Mn deficiency in humans results in a number of medical problems.
Cobalt is essential to the metabolism of all animals. It is a key constituent of cobalamin, also known as vitamin B12, the primary biological reservoir of cobalt as an ultratrace element [39] Bacteria in the stomachs of ruminant animals convert cobalt salts into vitamin B12, a compound which can only be produced by bacteria or archaea. A minimal percent of cobalt therefore markedly improves the health, and an uptake of 0.20 mg/kg a day is recommended because they have no other source of vitamin B12 [40].
The results of these studies clearly indicate that the ligands and their complexes are all potent and biologically active against one or more testing bacterial strains. So, the complexing of STG with either Mn and Co will be of great interest and may play a vital role in improving glucose metabolism [41,42,43] as Mn and Co change the chemical structure of STG, which plays a role in the improvement of biological functions, hepatic functions, and enzymes; enhances antioxidant capacities, and elevates SOD enzymes [44,45]. We confirmed this in the current study, and there was great improvement in the groups treated with either Mn or Co metal ions that improved hepatic function enzymes and hepatic histological structures.
We believe that the improvement shown in the animal group treated with either Mn/STG or Co/STG was due to the importance of these metals as an essential element for healthy development. This concept is consistent with a previous study by El-Megharbel et al. [5].
More evidence for the beneficial impact of Mn/STG and Co/STG complexes is that they improve hepatic functions and ameliorate hepatic antioxidant activities. SOD deficiency is believed to be associated with the development of many inflammatory processes [43], and these complexes may perform the role of SOD in detoxification in normal tissues. Therefore, the STG/Mn and STG/Co novel metal complexes greatly improve SOD enzyme levels, indicating high potency for the hepatic antioxidant cellular defense system, as confirmed in a previous study [5].
The use of the SOD enzyme as a therapeutic agent has been partially successful in animals, but not in humans [45]. Pharmacokinetic problems, such as the drug’s quick delivery problems and the drug’s short half-life in the blood, are essential obstacles to the use of antioxidant enzymes in humans. As a result, the use of STG in combination with vital metals such as Mn and Co was attempted to increase the effectiveness of STG while minimizing its hepatic adverse effects. Mimicking natural enzymes such as SOD may have similar chemistry and thus be useful in treating diseases under low toxicity and safe biological conditions.
The main purpose of STG is to lower or maintain blood glucose levels as low as possible, reducing the risk of complications. Owing to the multifactorial nature of the pathophysiology of type II diabetes mellitus, the response to these drugs is individualized and can show a great difference [46].
The cascade of complications involved in inflammatory procedures is due to oxidative stress. The current findings support it and are supported by the current finding that STG novel metal complexes are effective in preventing hepatic toxicity and reducing oxidative injury [47]. Some of these mechanisms are potentially modifiable by dipeptedyl peptidase-4 inhibition [48].
Oral administration of STG and STG metal complexes (Cu, Mg, or Zn) at the indicated dose significantly reduced blood glucose levels during the treatment period and improved glycemic control in diabetic rats, as evidenced by an amelioration in insulin hormone levels [5]. However, the STG metal complexes showed better blood glucose control than either agent alone. Furthermore, an antidipeptedyl peptidase-4 activity could be obtained when combined with STG. This notion could explain the synergistic effect of STG on glucose homeostasis when combined with metals.
The Gram-negative strains are exposed to various stress conditions during pathogenesis, of which acid stress serves as a major defense mechanism in the host [49]. Such environments are encountered, and this supports the main hypothesis of the study that proved the hepatoprotective and antioxidant capacities of two synthesized STG with either Co(II) or Mn(II). The two complexes also showed antibacterial activity in addition to their abilities in reducing free radical production.

5. Conclusions

This study revealed that hepatic tissues were greatly ameliorated after administration of STG complexes with Mn(II)/STG and Co(II)/STG combination therapy, which improved liver enzymes and contributed to improvements in hepatic and metabolic complications by a different percentage over STG alone. Our results confirm that the Mn/STG and Co/STG complexes were efficient and safe for the treatment of hepatic alterations and oxidative stress with increased antioxidant activity, also improving the histological structure of the liver tissues. The STG/Mn complex was highly effective against Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus pneumonia, while STG/Co was highly effective against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureas. These results open a new door for developing novel therapeutic strategies for improving health, and we recommend more prospective clinical studies on the safety of Mn/STG and Co/STG complexes and a wide range of other metals in a wide range setting to gain a better understanding of their effectiveness in protecting hepatic tissues.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; methodology, S.M.E.-M., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; validation, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B. and R.Z.H.; formal analysis, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; investigation, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B. and R.Z.H.; resources, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; data curation, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; writing—review and editing, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; supervision, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; project administration, S.M.E.-M., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H.; funding acquisition, S.M.E.-M., N.M.A.-B., E.H.A.-T., S.H.Q., B.A. and R.Z.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animals used in this study were treated according to the protocol approved by Ethical Committee of Taif University (42-0074).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are available inside the text.

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge Taif University Researchers Supporting number (TURSP-2020/15), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia and authors acknowledge with thanked the deanship of scientific research (DSR) for the technical support at King Abdul-Aziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shahinul, A.; Jhumur, G.; Golam, M.; Mohammad, K.; Nooruddin, A. Effect of sitagliptin on hepatic histological activity and fibrosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients: A 1-year randomized control trial. Hepatic Med. Evid. Res. 2018, 10, 23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anstee, Q.M.; Targher, G.; Day, C.P. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 330–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gross, B.N.; Cross, L.B.; Foard, J.; Wood, Y. Elevated hepatic enzymes potentially associated with sitagliptin. Ann. Pharmacother. 2010, 44, 394–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vaghasiya, J.; Sheth, N.; Bhalodia, Y.; Manek, R. Sitagliptin protects renal ischemia reperfusion induced renal damage in diabetes. Regul. Pept. 2011, 166, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. El-Megharbel, S.M.; Refat, M.S.; Al-Salmi, F.A.; Hamza, R.Z. In Situ Neutral System Synthesis, Spectroscopic, and Biological Interpretations of Magnesium (II), Calcium (II), Chromium (III), Zinc (II), Copper (II) and Selenium (IV) Sitagliptin Complexes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Maiztegui, B.; Borelli, M.I.; Madrid, V.G.; Del Zotto, H.; Raschia, M.A.; Francini, F.; Massa, M.L.; Flores, L.E.; Rebolledo, O.R.; Gagliardino, J.J. Sitagliptin prevents the development of metabolic and hormonal disturbances, increased β-cell apoptosis and liver steatosis induced by a fructose-rich diet in normal rats. Clin. Sci. 2011, 120, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yilmaz., Y.; Yonal, O.; Deyneli, O.; Celikel, C.A.; Kalayci, C.; Duman, D.G. Effects of sitagliptin in diabetic patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Acta Gastroenterol. Belg. 2012, 75, 240–244. [Google Scholar]
  8. Joy, T.R.; McKenzie, C.A.; Tirona, R.G.; Summers, K.; Seney, S.; Chakrabarti, S.; Malhotra, N.; Beaton, M.D. Sitagliptin in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomized, placebo controlled trial. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fonseca, V. Effect of thiazolidinediones on body weight in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Med. 2003, 115, 42S–48S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohamed, H.A.; Mahmoud, F.A.; Mahmoud, G.H.; Ahmed, H.H.; Mahmoud, H.M. The Beneficial Effects of Sitagliptin, a Dipeptedyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitor on Experimentally Induced Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Rats. Med. J. Cairo Univ. 2018, 86, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar]
  11. Toyoda-Akui, M.; Yokomori, H.; Kaneko, F.; Shimizu, Y.; Takeuchi, H.; Tahara, K.; Motoori, T.; Ohbu, M.; Oda, M.; Hibi, T. A Case of Drug-induced Hepatic Injury Associated with Sitagliptin. Intern. Med. 2011, 50, 1015–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Deepa, P.; Visakan, J. Comparison of phenotype and differentiation marker gene expression profiles in human dental pulp and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Eur. J. Dent. 2014, 8, 307–313. [Google Scholar]
  13. Daan, L.D.; Douwe, E.; Hanno, P.; Jacob, C.S.; Pieter, J.M.L.; Willem, A.D.; Elisabeth, F.C.V. The Impact of Obesity and Lifestyle on the Immune System and Susceptibility to Infections Such as COVID-19. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 597600. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gumieniczeka, A.; Berecka, A.; Mroczek, T.; Wojtanowski, K.; Dąbrowska, K.; Stępień, K. Determination of chemical stability of sitagliptin by LC-UV, LC-MS and FT-IR methods. Analysis 2019, 164, 789–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tajiri, K.; Shimizu, Y. Practical guidelines for diagnosis and early management of drug-induced liver injury. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 6774–6785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. McPherson, S.; Hardy, T.; Henderson, E.; Burt, A.D.; Day, C.P.; Anstee, Q.M. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: Implications for prognosis and clinical management. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Refat, M.S.; Hamza, R.Z.; Adam, A.A.; Saad, H.A.; Gobouri, A.A.; Al-Salmi, F.A.; Altalhi, T.A.; El-Megharbel, S.M. Potential Therapeutic Effects of New Ruthenium (III) Complex with Quercetin: Characterization, Structure, Gene Regulation, and Antitumor and Anti-Inflammatory Studies (RuIII/Q Novel Complex Is a Potent Immunoprotective Agent). Crystals 2021, 11, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bock, R. A Handbook of Decomposition Methods in Analytical Chemistry; International Text Book; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  19. Krug, F.J. Métodos de Decomposição de Amostras, III Workshop Sobre Preparo de Amostras; FAPESP: São Carlos, Brazil, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ohkawa, H.; Ohishi, N.; Yagi, K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1979, 95, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marklund, S.; Marklund, G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Europ. J. Biochem. 1974, 47, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Meth. Enzymol. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  23. Couri, D.; Abdel-Rahman, M.S. Effect of chlorine dioxide and metabolites on glutathione-dependent system in rat, mouse and chicken blood. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 1980, 3, 451–460. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hafeman, D.G.; Sunde, R.A.; Hoekstra, W.G. Effect of dietary selenium on erythrocyte and liver glutathione peroxidase in the rat. J. Nutrit. 1974, 104, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bauer, A.W.; Kirby, W.M.; Sherris, C.; Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966, 45, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pfaller, M.A.; Burmeister, L.; Bartlett, M.A.; Rinaldi, M.G. Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988, 26, 1437–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Matar, M.J.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Paetznick, V.L.; Rodriguez, J.R.; Chen, E.; Rex, J.H. Correlation between E-test, disk diffusion, and microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole and voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 1647–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard M7-A3; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Villanova, PA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liebowitz, L.D.; Ashbee, H.R.; Evans, E.G.V.; Chong, Y.; Mallatova, N.; Zaidi, M.; Gibbs, D. A two-year global evaluation of the susceptibility of Candida species to fluconazole by disk diffusion. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2001, 40, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. IBM. IBM SPSS. Statistics for Windows; Version 27; IBM Corp: Armonk, NY, USA, 2020; Available online: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27049428 (accessed on 13 August 2021).
  31. Beers, J.R.; Sizer, I.W. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J. Biol. Chem. 1952, 195, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Refat, M.S. Complexes of uranyl (II), vanadyl (II) and zirconyl (II) with orotic acid “vitamin B13”: Synthesis, spectroscopic, thermal studies and antibacterial activity. J. Mol. Struct. 2007, 842, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nakamoto, N. Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds; Wiely: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nakamoto, K. Infrared Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, 2nd ed.; Wiley Interscience, John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  35. El-Megharbel, S.M.; Al-Salmi, F.A.; Al-Harthi, S.; Alsolami, K.; Hamza, R.Z. Chitosan/Selenium Nanoparticles Attenuate Diclofenac Sodium-Induced Testicular Toxicity in Male Rats. Crystals 2021, 11, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hamza, R.Z.; Al-Eisa, R.A.; El-Shenawy, N.S. Possible Ameliorative Effects of the Royal Jelly on Hepatotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Induced by Molybdenum Nanoparticles and/or Cadmium Chloride in Male Rats. Biology 2022, 11, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. El-Megharbel, S.M.; Al-Thubaiti, E.H.; Qahl, S.H.; Al-Eisa, R.A.; Hamza, R.Z. Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Dapagliflozin/Zn (II), Cr (III) and Se (IV) Novel Complexes That Ameliorate Hepatic Damage, Hyperglycemia and Oxidative Injury Induced by Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Male Rats and Their Antibacterial Activity. Crystals 2022, 12, 304. [Google Scholar]
  38. Drucker, D.J.; Nauck, M.A. The incretin system: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2006, 368, 1696–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. El-Megharbel, S.M.; Hamza, R.Z.; Gobouri, A.A.; Refat, M.S. Synthesis of new antidiabetic agent by complexity between vanadyl (II) sulfate and vitamin B1: Structural, characterization, anti-DNA damage, structural alterations and antioxidative damage studies. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chohan, Z.H.; Sherazi, S.K. Biological Role of Cobalt (II), Copper (II) and Nickel (II) Metal Ions on the Antibacterial Properties of Some Nicotinoyl-Hydrazine Derived Compounds. Met.-Based Drugs 1997, 4, 871862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. DeFronzo, R.A. Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In Diabetes Epidemiology, Genetics, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment; Bonora, E., DeFronzo, R.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 181–253. [Google Scholar]
  42. Skovsø, S. Modeling type 2 diabetes in rats using high fat diet and streptozotocin. J. Diabetes Investig. 2014, 5, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, V.L. Zinc and insulin in pancreatic beta-cells. Endocrine 2014, 45, 178–189. [Google Scholar]
  44. Riley, D.P. Functional mimics of superoxide dismutase enzymes as therapeutic agents. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2573–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kramer, R. The Pharmaceutical Potential of Manganese-Based Superoxide Dismutase Mimics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4469–4470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kuhad, A.; Chopra, K. Tocotrienol attenuates oxidative-nitrosative stress and inflammatory cascade in experimental model of diabetic neuropathy. Neuropharmacology 2009, 57, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Erikson, K.M.; Ascher, M. Chapter 10. Manganese: Its Role in Disease and Health. In Essential Metals in Medicine: Therapeutic Use and Toxicity of Metal Ions in the Clinic; Metal Ions in Life Sciences; De Gruyter GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2009; Volume 19, pp. 253–266. [Google Scholar]
  48. Emsley, J. Nature’s Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  49. Daniel, R.; Urmesh, K.O.; Sangeeta, J.; Chandrashekhar, P.; Mrutyunjay, S. The Small RNA DsrA Influences the Acid Tolerance Response and Virulence of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 599. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Timeline for experimental protocol.
Figure 1. Timeline for experimental protocol.
Cimb 44 00124 g001
Figure 2. Graphical abstract for the experimental design.
Figure 2. Graphical abstract for the experimental design.
Cimb 44 00124 g002
Figure 3. FT-IR of (A), STG; (B), STG/Co; and (C), STG/Mn.
Figure 3. FT-IR of (A), STG; (B), STG/Co; and (C), STG/Mn.
Cimb 44 00124 g003
Figure 4. The proposed structure of complexes. where M = Mn+2 and Co+2.
Figure 4. The proposed structure of complexes. where M = Mn+2 and Co+2.
Cimb 44 00124 g004
Figure 5. XRD of STG/Mn and STG/Co.
Figure 5. XRD of STG/Mn and STG/Co.
Cimb 44 00124 g005
Figure 6. SEM of (A) STG/Mn and (B) STG/Co.
Figure 6. SEM of (A) STG/Mn and (B) STG/Co.
Cimb 44 00124 g006
Figure 7. TEM of (A) STG/Mn and (B) STG/Co.
Figure 7. TEM of (A) STG/Mn and (B) STG/Co.
Cimb 44 00124 g007
Figure 8. In vitro diffusion profile of STG/Mn and STG/Co complexes in slightly basic phosphate buffer saline at 37 °C. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 8. In vitro diffusion profile of STG/Mn and STG/Co complexes in slightly basic phosphate buffer saline at 37 °C. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Cimb 44 00124 g008
Figure 9. Effects of STG and its metal complexes (STG/Mn and STG/Co) on liver enzyme functions.
Figure 9. Effects of STG and its metal complexes (STG/Mn and STG/Co) on liver enzyme functions.
Cimb 44 00124 g009
Figure 10. (A) Control group: photomicrograph of cross-section of the hepatic tissues showing normal hepatic structure (H&Ex200). (B) STG group showing cross-section of experimental rat liver showing some adverse effects of STG administration on the liver comprising loss of normal architecture of liver lobules, ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes with cytoplasmic clearing (steatohepatitis) (orange arrow) and severe dilatation of the central vein with marked hemorrhage within it (red arrow) communicating with some dilated congested blood sinusoids (inverted arrow) (H&EX400). (C) STG/Mn-treated group showing amelioration of hepatic tissues with mildly dilated central vein (CV) at the center of the lobule surrounded by normal hepatocytes (HC) (H&Ex200). (D) STG/Co-treated group showing almost normal hepatic structure with dilated central vein (CV) at the center of the lobule surrounded by the hepatocytes; pericentral zone hepatocytes shows some necrosis (arrows) with lymphocytic inflammatory cell infiltrate (arrow head) H&Ex200).
Figure 10. (A) Control group: photomicrograph of cross-section of the hepatic tissues showing normal hepatic structure (H&Ex200). (B) STG group showing cross-section of experimental rat liver showing some adverse effects of STG administration on the liver comprising loss of normal architecture of liver lobules, ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes with cytoplasmic clearing (steatohepatitis) (orange arrow) and severe dilatation of the central vein with marked hemorrhage within it (red arrow) communicating with some dilated congested blood sinusoids (inverted arrow) (H&EX400). (C) STG/Mn-treated group showing amelioration of hepatic tissues with mildly dilated central vein (CV) at the center of the lobule surrounded by normal hepatocytes (HC) (H&Ex200). (D) STG/Co-treated group showing almost normal hepatic structure with dilated central vein (CV) at the center of the lobule surrounded by the hepatocytes; pericentral zone hepatocytes shows some necrosis (arrows) with lymphocytic inflammatory cell infiltrate (arrow head) H&Ex200).
Cimb 44 00124 g010
Figure 11. Antibacterial activity of STG and Mn(II) and Co(II) metal complexes.
Figure 11. Antibacterial activity of STG and Mn(II) and Co(II) metal complexes.
Cimb 44 00124 g011
Table 1. Instrumentations (All Analyses Were Performed after Preparation of the Complexes Immediately).
Table 1. Instrumentations (All Analyses Were Performed after Preparation of the Complexes Immediately).
InstrumentMeasurement
Perkin Elmer CHN 2400 (USA)The contents C, H, and N
Jenway 4010 conductivity meterElectrolytic or nonelectrolytic character
Bruker FTIR Spectrophotometer (4000–400 cm−1)IR measurements
Quanta FEG 250 equipmentScanning electron microscopy (SEM) images
X ‘Pert PRO PAN analytical X-ray powder diffraction, target copper with secondary monochromateThe X-ray diffraction patterns
JEOL 100 s microscopyThe transmission electron microscopy images (TEM)
Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy instrument (Perkin Elmer Analyst 400)Metal content and Cl
Table 2. Assignments of infrared spectral bands for STG and its complexity.
Table 2. Assignments of infrared spectral bands for STG and its complexity.
AssignmentsCompounds
STGMn(II)Co(II)
N–H stretching335733003331
C–H stretching3059
2917
2850
2920
2856
2917
2849
C=O stretching166916371638
C=N stretching163316331633
NH2 bending1609--
C–C and C–N stretching1556
1514
1426
15181517
1428
CH in plane bending1324
1274
1334
1316
1275
1333
1276
C–F stretching1330
1267
1146
1331
1269
1140
1332
1270
1139
CH out-of-plane bending915
880
841
720
887
840
663
887
M–O stretching-660666
M–N stretching-560558
Table 3. Effects of STG, STG/Mn, and STG/Co on liver function levels in male rats.
Table 3. Effects of STG, STG/Mn, and STG/Co on liver function levels in male rats.
ParametersControlSTGSTG/MnSTG/Co
ALT (U/L)12.51 ± 0.42 c (−−−)123.31 ± 6.69 a (++++)13.40 ± 0.82 bc (−−−)23.87 ± 3.14 b (−−−)
AST (U/L)12.43 ± 0.37 c (−−−)164.26 ± 5.27 a (++++)11.27 ± 0.52 c (−−−)25.53 ± 3.20 b (−−−)
LDH (U/L)84.05 ± 8.47 c (−−−)567.42 ± 47.00 a (++++)133.56 ± 11.91 c (−−−)220.02 ± 12.05 b (++−)
Results are expressed as mean ± SE. Symbols are different alphabetically to indicate a significant comparison compared to the control group and other treated groups (p < 0.05) (Similar letters imply partial or complete nonsignificance). STG, Sitagliptin; ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; LDH, Lactate dehydrogenase. Scoring of hepatic enzymes: (++++), moderate hepatic damage; (++−), slight hepatic damage; and (−−−), no hepatic damage.
Table 4. Effects of STG, STG/Mn, and STG/Co on oxidative stress enzymes and oxidative damage markers in hepatic tissues in male rats.
Table 4. Effects of STG, STG/Mn, and STG/Co on oxidative stress enzymes and oxidative damage markers in hepatic tissues in male rats.
ParametersControlSTGSTG/MnSTG/Co
CAT (U/g)7.68 ± 0.26 b1.79 ± 0.16 c7.00 ± 1.11 a6.87 ± 0.35 b
SOD (U/g)8.19 ± 0.26 b2.07 ± 0.45 d7.83 ± 0.34 a7.86 ± 0.39 c
GRx (U/g)6.46 ± 0.38 a1.30 ± 0.88 c6.12 ± 0.33 a6.09 ± 0.45 b
MDA (µg/mg)2.75 ± 0.15 c55.21 ± 1.30 a5.71 ± 0.68 b4.64 ± 0.68 b
GPx (U/g)12.22 ± 0.45 a2.55 ± 0.40 c11.72 ± 0.51 a11.56 ± 0.65 b
Results are expressed as mean ± SE. Symbols are different alphabetically to indicate a significant comparison compared to the control group and other treated groups (p < 0.05) (Similar letters imply partial or complete nonsignificance). Similar letters imply partial or complete nonsignificance. STG, Sitagliptin; CAT, Catalase; MDA, Malondialdehyde; SOD, Super oxide dismutase; GRx, Glutathione reductase; and GPx, Glutathione peroxidase.
Table 5. Scoring of histological hepatic structures.
Table 5. Scoring of histological hepatic structures.
Scoring Control GroupSTG GroupSTG/MnSTG/Co
Groups
Normal hepatic structure(++++)(++−)(+++)(+++)
Loss of normal hepatic lobules(−−−−)(++++)(−−−−)(−−−−)
Marked hemorrhage(−−−−)(++−)(−−−−)(−−−−)
Dilated congested blood sinusoids(−−−−)(++++)(−−−−)(−−−−)
Mildly dilated central vein(−−−−)(−−−−)(+++)(++−)
Lymphocytic inflammatory cell infiltration(−−−−)(−−−−)(−−−−)(+++)
Scoring indicates: (++++), High effect; (+++), Moderate effect; (++−), Slight effect; and (−−−−) No effect.
Table 6. Inhibition zone diameter (Cm/mg sample) of STG metal complexes.
Table 6. Inhibition zone diameter (Cm/mg sample) of STG metal complexes.
SampleInhibition Zone Diameter (mm/mg Sample)
Bacillus subtilis
(G+)
Streptococcus
pneumonia
(G+)
Staphylococcus
aureas
(G+)
Escherichia coli
(G)
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
(G)
Control (DMSO)0.0 ± 0.0 c0.0 ± 0.0 d0.0 ± 0.0 e0.0 ± 0.0 d0.0 ± 0.0 d
Sitagliptin (STG)4 ± 0.01 b5 ± 0.53 c5± 0.39 d4 ± 0.21 c2 ± 0.15 c
Mn(II)–STG12 ± 0.12 a14 ± 0.31 a10 ± 0.48 b11 ± 0.16 a7 ± 0.25 a
Co(III)–STG11 ± 0.24 a7 ± 0.21 b15 ± 0.37 c16 ± 0.45 a10 ± 0.49 a
Means within the same column (mean ± SE) with different letters are significant at p ≤ 0.05 using Duncan’s multiple range test, where the highest mean value has symbol (a) and those decreasing in value are assigned alphabetically.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Megharbel, S.M.; Al-Baqami, N.M.; Al-Thubaiti, E.H.; Qahl, S.H.; Albogami, B.; Hamza, R.Z. Antidiabetic Drug Sitagliptin with Divalent Transition Metals Manganese and Cobalt: Synthesis, Structure, Characterization Antibacterial and Antioxidative Effects in Liver Tissues. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 1810-1827. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cimb44050124

AMA Style

El-Megharbel SM, Al-Baqami NM, Al-Thubaiti EH, Qahl SH, Albogami B, Hamza RZ. Antidiabetic Drug Sitagliptin with Divalent Transition Metals Manganese and Cobalt: Synthesis, Structure, Characterization Antibacterial and Antioxidative Effects in Liver Tissues. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 44(5):1810-1827. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cimb44050124

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Megharbel, Samy M., Najah M. Al-Baqami, Eman H. Al-Thubaiti, Safa H. Qahl, Bander Albogami, and Reham Z. Hamza. 2022. "Antidiabetic Drug Sitagliptin with Divalent Transition Metals Manganese and Cobalt: Synthesis, Structure, Characterization Antibacterial and Antioxidative Effects in Liver Tissues" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 44, no. 5: 1810-1827. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cimb44050124

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop