Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as a Novel Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Study
by
, , ,
Kun-Ling Lin
1,2,3, 
Kuang-Shun Chueh
1,4,5,
Jian-He Lu
6,
Shu-Mien Chuang
4,7,
Bin-Nan Wu
8,
Yung-Chin Lee
4,7,9,
Yi-Hsuan Wu
1,4,7,
Mei-Chen Shen
4,7,
Ting-Wei Sun
4,7,
Cheng-Yu Long
2,9,10,* and
Yung-Shun Juan
1,4,5,7,* 1
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
4
Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
5
Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
6
Emerging Compounds Research Center, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung County 912, Taiwan
7
Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
8
Department of Pharmacology, Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
9
Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
10
Regenerative Medicine and Cell Therapy Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2021, 57(9), 947; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57090947
Submission received: 1 August 2021
/
Revised: 24 August 2021
/
Accepted: 6 September 2021
/
Published: 8 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions Management)
Abstract
:Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effects of low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LiESWT) on stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Materials and Methods: This investigation was a multicenter, single-blind, randomized-controlled trial study. Sixty female SUI patients were randomly assigned to receive LiESWT with 0.25 mJ/mm2 intensity, 3000 pulses, and 3 pulses/s, once weekly for a 4-week (W4) and 8-week (W8) period, or an identical sham LiESWT treatment without energy transmission. The primary endpoint was the changes in urine leakage as measured by a pad test and validated standardized questionnaires, while the secondary endpoint was the changes in a 3-day urinary diary among the baseline (W0), the W4 and W8 of LiESWT, and 1-month (F1), 3-month (F3), and 6-month (F6) follow-up after LiESWT. Results: The results showed that 4 weeks of LiESWT could significantly decrease urine leakage based on the pad test and validated standardized questionnaire scores, as compared to the sham group. Moreover, 8 weeks of LiESWT could significantly reduce urine leakage but increase urine volume and attenuate urgency symptoms, which showed meaningful and persistent improvement at W8, F1, F3, and F6. Furthermore, validated standardized questionnaire scores were significantly improved at W8, F1, F3, and F6 as compared to the baseline (W0). Conclusions: Eight weeks of LiESWT attenuated SUI symptoms upon physical activity, reduced urine leakage, and ameliorated overactive bladder symptoms, which implied that LiESWT significantly improved the quality of life. Our findings suggested that LiESWT could serve as a potentially novel and non-invasive treatment for SUI.
1. Introduction
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), according to the International Continence Society, is the involuntary leakage of urine upon physical exertion, effort, coughing, or sneezing [1]. The global prevalence of urinary incontinence in the female population is approximately 50% [2], which is a significant problem, namely the impairment of quality of life (QoL), such as reducing social interaction and physical activity, destroying sexual relationships, and worsening emotional and mental health.
Excessive hypermobility of the urethra and/or bladder neck resulting from pelvic floor degeneration and internal sphincter deficiency are the two main mechanisms of SUI. Clinical managements of SUI are various, such as lifestyle changes, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), and medication, as well as surgery. PFMT is advocated as a valuable first choice with negligible complications and an acceptable cure rate, but it requires patient long-term regular exercise to achieve satisfying results [3]. Mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery is considered as the preferred surgical method because of the high cure rate [4], but it has a significant rate of complications [5]. Therefore, novel therapies that can restore normal pelvic floor strength and internal sphincter function are urgently needed.
The extracorporeal shock wave is a longitudinal acoustic wave that propagates through human tissues at the speed of an ultrasound wave in water [6]. As an example of these, low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LiESWT) could induce local inflammation reaction and promote angiogenesis, recruit mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells, stimulate cellular proliferation and regeneration [7], and inhibit oxidative stress, thus improving blood circulation and enhancing tissue repair [8]. In recent basic and clinical studies, the efficacy of LiESWT in treating chronic injuries of soft tissues (e.g., erectile dysfunction (ED) [9,10,11] and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) [12,13] has been well established. More importantly, the benefit of LiESWT is that it is a non-invasive, outpatient-based therapy featuring short treatment sessions, which helps patients to be free from anesthesia and the adverse effects of medication or surgery.
A recent study using a vaginal balloon dilation (VBD)-induced SUI rat model showed that SUI rats treated with LiESWT (0.06 mJ/mm2, and 300 shocks at 3 pulses/s) following VBD had significantly higher leak-point pressure (LPP) relative to those receiving VBD only. LiESWT improved LPP and ameliorated SUI by promoting urethral sphincter regeneration, angiogenesis, and progenitor cell recruitment [7]. With the same energy and course of LiESWT, another VBD-induced SUI rat study revealed that an increased amount of urethral and vaginal smooth and striated muscle content, and increased thickness of the vaginal wall, were noted after LiESWT treatment [14]. Higher LPP was also found in the LiESWT group [14]. Recently, we published our preliminary results on human subjects showing that 8 weeks of LiESWT attenuated SUI symptoms with short term follow-up [15]. Interestingly, LiESWT also ameliorated overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms during follow-up [15]. In the current study, we further evaluate the clinical application of LiESWT on SUI patients and its persistence efficacy, including attenuating bladder urine leaks, impacting on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, and promoting quality of life.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design
This single-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled trial was performed at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan between December 2018 and January 2020. The investigation was approved by the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. KMUHIRB-F(II)-20180010) and was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04059133) on 16 August 2019. The study enrolled 60 female participants aged 20–75 years who had been diagnosed with SUI or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) but SUI predominant patients for more than 3 months in this investigation (sham, n = 15; LiESWT, n = 45). The major inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1. Based on the limitations regarding the feasibility of the project at our center, as well as a type I error (α) of 0.05 and type II error (β) of 0.2, we aimed to enroll a total of 60 patients in this study. Considering that patients would be more likely to join a trial if they had a good chance of getting active treatment, participants were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to the study groups with blinded computer-assisted allocation. All participants were provided with informed consent before entering the study and randomly allocated to the sham group or to the LiESWT group by computer generated random numbers.
2.2. Physical Indicators and Biochemical Parameters of Studied Participants
The physical and serum parameters of metabolic syndrome were associated with the symptoms of SUI [16]. In order to investigate the baseline characteristics of SUI population, the physical indicators (age, height, weight, waistline, body mass index, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and mean arterial pressure) and biochemical parameters (hemoglobin A1c (glycated hemoglobin), blood sugar, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase and glutamate pyruvate transaminase for liver function index, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine for renal function index, lipid profile on triglycerides, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein) were analyzed.
2.3. Procedure and Medical Information of LiESWT
Participants were informed of treatment modalities, including the required consent to join this study and once weekly LiESWT for 8 weeks and follow-up at 6-month after completing the course of treatment (Figure 1). Our instrumentation was the DUOLITH SD1-TOP focused shock wave system (STORZ MEDICAL AG). The LiESWT was applied with 0.25 mJ/mm2 of intensity, 3000 pulses of shock, and 3 pulses/s of frequency on the middle urethra, including middle, left, and right side of the participant’s labia [15]. The sham group used an air pad probe to block energy transmission to the tissue, but the machine still emitted shock wave generation.
2.4. Pad Test for the Evaluation of SUI
The pad test was applied as a non-invasive diagnosis for quantifying the severity of urine leakage in SUI participants [17,18]. The purpose of pad test in this study was to evaluate the effect of LiESWT on reducing urinary incontinence. The detailed steps were performed according to our previous study [14]. The percentage (%) of improvement was evaluated at 4-week (W4), 8-week (W8), and 1-month follow-up (F1), 3-month follow-up (F3), and 6-month follow-up (F6) after LiESWT treatment, and the results were normalized with pretreatment baseline data (W0).
2.5. Outcomes Measures and Therapeutic Efficacy Assessment for LiESWT
To analyze the effects of LiESWT, the primary endpoints were the changes in pad test and questionnaires (Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-6), and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7)) [15], and the secondary endpoints were the changes in 3-day urinary diary (bedtime and wake up time, fluid intake, amount of urine drained, and leaks) at the baseline (W0), 4-week (W4), 8-week (W8), and 1-month follow-up (F1), 3-month follow-up (F3), and 6-month follow-up (F6).
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Quantitative data were represented as the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Paired t-test and one-way analysis of variance were used to perform a repeated measurement analysis for intragroup before/after treatment [19]. The paired t-test was performed in the sham group (W0 vs. W4). The post hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference tests were used to make comparisons between the LiESWT subgroups and to calculate p-values for comparison [19]. The student t-test was performed for the intergroup comparison (the sham group vs. the LiESWT group). For all statistical analyses, p < 0.05 was statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Diagnoses
From 2018 to January 2020, a total of 60 female participants, aged 20–75 years, were enrolled in this clinical trial study (NCT04059133). The designed timetable is shown in Figure 1. The physical and serum parameters of metabolic syndrome may be associated with the symptoms of SUI. Therefore, we analyzed the baseline values and demographic features of patients. As presented in Table 2, all physical indicators and serum parameters were characterized for the normal range at W0. The results also revealed that there were no significant differences in these parameters between the sham group and the LiESWT group.
3.2. Primary and Secondary End Points
A pad test is useful for detecting bladder involuntary leakage of urine during physical activity examination. The amount of bladder urine leakage in the sham group was no significantly different before or after the 4-week treatment (p = 0.281) (Table 3 and Figure 2A). However, the 4-week LiESWT group noticeably decreased urine leakage as compared to the sham group (p = 0.004). Moreover, LiESWT significantly decreased urine leakage from 7.93 ± 1.32 (W0) to 2.43 ± 0.40 g (W4, p < 0.001) and sustained this until F6 (Table 3 and Figure 2B). Further analysis found that 64.4% of participants had moderate to better improvement (>50%) after 4 weeks of LiESWT, and the proportion of improvement increased to 68.8%, 77.8%, 82.3%, and 84.5% at W8, F1, F3, and F6, respectively (Figure 2C).
The 3-day urinary diary was analyzed (Table 3). LiESWT significantly improved the mean times of the urgency at W8 and sustained the improvement until F6. The average urine volume was noticeably raised at F3 and F6. According to the 3-day voiding diary, 8 weeks of LiESWT significantly improved OAB symptoms in those SUI participants.
The effects of LiESWT on OAB symptoms, physical activity induced involuntary urine leakage, and QoL were examined. The results of the questionnaire for QoL and social activity are shown in Figure 3 and Table 3. In the sham group, there was no significant difference in OABSS, ICIQ-SF, UDI-6, and IIQ-7 questionnaire scores. However, 4 weeks of LiESWT significantly improved for all questionnaires, ICIQ-SF (p = 0.034), UDI-6 (p = 0.040), and IIQ-7 (p = 0.048) scores as compared to the sham group, except for OABSS (p = 0.520). In the LiESWT group, all questionnaires also revealed significant improvement at W8, F1, F3, and F6 (Figure 3 and Table 3). Based on the questionnaires, the results showed that LiESWT treatment improved both bladder urine leakage and OAB symptoms, including urinary frequency, nocturia, urgency, and urgency incontinence between W8 and F6 as compared to W0 (Figure 3).
3.3. Safety and Adverse Effects
All participants in this study were well tolerated with LiESWT. No significant adverse reactions related to LiESWT were detected, such as skin ecchymosis, hematuria, or intolerable pain. There was no single patient withdrawn from the study due to any adverse effect.
4. Discussion
This investigation was a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial study. The results showed that 8 weeks of LiESWT decreased urine leakage as shown by the pad test and attenuated urgency symptoms as shown by the 3-day urinary diary. There was significant and persistent improvement for as long as 6 months of follow-up. Moreover, validated standardized questionnaire scores were also significantly improved at W8, F1, F3, and F6 as compared to the baseline. These findings indicate that 8 weeks of LiESWT significantly attenuated SUI symptoms by reducing urine leakage, ameliorating overactive bladder symptoms, and improving QoL, which implies that LiESWT could serve as a novel, non-invasive treatment for SUI (Figure 4).
Clinically, the applications of LiESWT in urological disorders includes ED [9,10,11] and CP/CPPS [12,13], but the safety and the effectiveness of treating female SUI are still under investigation. LiESWT (0.09–0.25 mJ/mm2, 1500–6000 pulses, 1–2 times per week, 4–12 sessions) was found to significantly increase penile hemodynamics and induce penile tissue regeneration in ED patients [9,11], and 50% of these patients maintained such a therapeutic effect after 2 years [10]. In addition, LiESWT with 0.25 mJ/mm2 intensity, 2500–3000 pulses, and 3–4 pulses/s, once each week for 4 weeks can noticeably relieve perineum pain, improve bladder voiding symptoms, and QoL; its significant therapeutic effects lasted from 4 months to 1 year posttreatment [12,13,20]. Our results showed that 8 weeks of LiESWT with 0.25 mJ/mm2 intensity, 3000 pulses, 3 pulses/s and once weekly could significantly decrease urine leakage, attenuate urgency symptom of overactive bladder, and improve QoL, which showed persistent improvement for as long as 6-month of follow-up. In summary, the application of LiESWT is helpful not only for the treatment of CPPS and ED but also SUI. Further application of LiESWT on other urologic diseases, such as OAB is under investigation.
SUI is a common and disturbing disease with a variety of management modalities, including PFMT, biofeedback training, electrostimulation, vaginal laser therapy, and surgery. PFMT is promoted as a valuable first choice physical therapy for SUI women, with a reported cure rate of 56%, and the therapeutic effect can be maintained for up to one year after treatment [3]. However, there were no standard parameters of muscle contraction and relaxation for PFMT, and it required more than six months to achieve significant improvement; the patients were prone to give up PFMT [21]. Moreover, the effect of PFMT on patients with moderate to severe urinary incontinence is also poor. MUS surgery seemed to work well for short term follow-up to one year in SUI patients with an over 80% cure rate [4]. However, while few in number, implanted slings have surgical risks and adverse consequences. Souders et al. analyzed more than 70,000 legal statements on the use of artificial mesh or sling from 2000 to 2014, and found that most (63%) of them were related to the retropubic or transobturator sling procedures for the treatment of SUI [22]. The rise in lawsuits does not reflect the acceptably low complication rates for slings for SUI reported in the literature. Reported complications included bladder injury (0.8–11.4%), vaginal injury (0.8–15%), hemorrhage (0.7–5.5%), urinary tract infections (0.9–33%), urine retention (0.8–11.4%), and mesh erosion (0–10%) [5]. According to FDA recommendations, clinically meaningful improvement in SUI symptoms is defined as improvement in pad weight or the number of incontinence episodes with a reduction from baseline greater than 50%. Our investigation demonstrated that 64.4% of women had moderate to better improvement (>50%) after 4 weeks of LiESWT therapy and sustained this until F6 (Figure 2C). In addition, no side effects were observed in participants during the LiESWT treatment and follow-up.
Interestingly, the results also showed that 8 weeks of LiESWT with 0.25 mJ/mm2 intensity, 3000 pulses, 3 pulses/s and once weekly could not only significantly decrease urine leakage but also attenuate the urgency symptom of the overactive bladder and improve QoL, which showed persistent improvement for as long as 6-month follow-up. The actual mechanism of the beneficial effect of LiESWT on OAB is still unclear. The main reason why LiESWT for SUI can also ameliorate OAB symptoms is that LiESWT can restore pelvic floor function and, thereafter, improve conscious control of the bladder by activating the part of the brain responsible for the voluntary urinary inhibition reflex. In a previous study, the contraction of the urethral sphincter led to the suppression of detrusor pressure. By this mechanism, the voluntary urinary inhibition reflex can be mediated [23,24]. Several studies have also raised the “integral theory”, which points out that the instability and stretch of the pelvic floor muscle induces inadequate micturition reflex and results in OAB symptoms [25]. In our previous Er:YAG vaginal laser treatment for SUI study, OABSS also significantly decreased following vaginal laser treatment [26]. Moreover, another study has also proved that pelvic floor reconstruction could ameliorate OAB symptoms [27]. From these points of view, LiESWT consolidates the pelvic floor muscle, reduces the micturition reflex and, finally, has benefit for OAB symptoms.
The status of pelvic floor muscles plays an important role in pelvic organ study. The main cause of SUI is related to pelvic floor malfunction, which results in pelvic organ over mobilization. Previous studies of animal models have suggested that LiESWT could induce a local inflammation reaction and promote angiogenesis by enhancing the expression of VEGF and the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells to the injured site [7]. LiESWT was also shown to stimulate cellular proliferation and regeneration [7], inhibit oxidative stress production [8], and anti-apoptotic cells [8], thus improving blood circulation [7,8], increasing urethral muscle regeneration [7], and enhancing tissue repair [8]. Theoretically, through the effect of LiESWT, pelvic floor muscles can repair gradually, and the over mobilization of the bladder can attenuate, which results in the improvement of stress urinary incontinence.
Our study had several limitations. First, patients were limited to small numbers. People benefiting from LiESWT treatment have yet to be confirmed in larger prospective studies. Second, the inability to obtain bladder tissue in clinical trials, leading to biomarker analysis (such as inflammation, angiogenesis, tissue repair, and regeneration-related genes), was not comprehensive in this study. Animal experiments are needed in the future to investigate the potential molecular mechanism underlying LiESWT treatment for SUI. Another important limitation of this study was the lack of follow-up for the sham-treated participants who dropped out and refused to follow up for reasons of ineffectiveness. Although it was explained at the time of recruitment that the LiESWT treatment might not be effective immediately, some participants in the sham group, due to over expectations of the efficacy of LiESWT, dropped out and refused to follow up for reasons of ineffectiveness after 5–6 treatments with LiESWT, which resulted in the lack of W8, F1, F3, and F6 data.
5. Conclusions
The present study demonstrated that 8 weeks of LiESWT could improve SUI symptoms during physical activity, reduce urine leakage, lessen OAB symptoms, and promote QoL. The effects of LiESWT may restore the pathophysiology of SUI and sustain it for 6 months. These findings suggest that LiESWT could serve as a potentially promising and alternative method for treating SUI patients. Authors should discuss the results and how they can be interpreted from the perspective of previous studies and the working hypotheses. The findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible. Future research directions may also be highlighted.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.-S.C., J.-H.L., S.-M.C., B.-N.W., C.-Y.L., Y.-C.L., K.-L.L., Y.-H.W., M.-C.S., T.-W.S. and Y.-S.J.; methodology, K.-S.C., J.-H.L., S.-M.C., C.-Y.L., Y.-C.L., K.-L.L., Y.-H.W. and Y.-S.J.; software, S.-M.C. and J.-H.L.; validation Y.-S.J.; formal analysis, S.-M.C., C.-Y.L. and Y.-S.J.; investigation, S.-M.C., B.-N.W., C.-Y.L. and Y.-S.J.; resources, S.-M.C., C.-Y.L. and Y.-S.J.; data curation, S.-M.C., M.-C.S., T.-W.S., C.-Y.L. and Y.-S.J.; writing—original draft preparation, K.-S.C., J.-H.L., S.-M.C., K.-L.L., Y.-H.W. and Y.-S.J.; writing—review and editing, S.-M.C., C.-Y.L. and Y.-S.J.; visualization, S.-M.C., C.-Y.L. and Y.-S.J.; supervision, S.-M.C., C.-Y.L. and Y.-S.J.; project administration, S.-M.C., C.-Y.L. and Y.-S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research is supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 105-2314-B-037-043-MY3 (Yung-Shun Juan) and MOST 109-2314-B-037-096 (Yung-Shun Juan)), in part by the Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital and Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital (KMUH-106-6R60 (Yung-Shun Juan), KMTTH-106-025 (Chia Chun Tsai), KMTTH-108-002 (Yung-Shun Juan), KMTTH-108-003 (Kuang-Shun Chueh)), and also in part by the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW107-TDU-B-212-123006 (Yung-Shun Juan) and MOHW108-TDU-B-212-133006 (Yung-Shun Juan)).
Institutional Review Board Statement
This clinical trial was performed with the approval of the institutional review board of a tertiary medical center (clinical trial registration No. KMUHIRB-F(II)-20180010), approved on 27 February 2018. This study was also registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04059133) and the date of registration was 16 August 2019.
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects after they received a full explanation of the study of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Chang-Hwei Chen of the University at Albany, State University of New York for his valuable comments on this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interest.
References
- Abrams, P.; Cardozo, L.; Fall, M.; Griffiths, D.; Rosier, P.; Ulmsten, U.; Van Kerrebroeck, P.; Victor, A.; Wein, A.; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003, 61, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannestad, Y.S.; Rortveit, G.; Sandvik, H.; Hunskaar, S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: The Norwegian EPINCONT study. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2000, 53, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumoulin, C.; Hay-Smith, E.J.; Mac Habee-Seguin, G. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, CD005654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ford, A.A.; Rogerson, L.; Cody, J.D.; Ogah, J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, CD006375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, Y.H.; Lee, C.K.; Chang, S.D.; Chien, P.C.; Hsu, Y.Y.; Tseng, L.H. Focusing on long-term complications of mid-urethral slings among women with stress urinary incontinence as a patient safety improvement measure: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2021, 100, e26257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogden, J.A.; Toth-Kischkat, A.; Schultheiss, R. Principles of shock wave therapy. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001, 387, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, A.K.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Ning, H.; Zaid, U.; Villalta, J.D.; Wang, G.; Banie, L.; Lin, G.; Lue, T.F. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence with low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy in a vaginal balloon dilation induced rat model. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2018, 7, S7–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hsiao, C.C.; Huang, W.H.; Cheng, K.H.; Lee, C.T. Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Ameliorates Kidney Function in Diabetic Nephropathy. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 8259645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, E.; Cartmill, R. Evaluation of clinical efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction rate after low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction: An Australian first open-label single-arm prospective clinical trial. BJU Int. 2015, 115 (Suppl. 5), 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kitrey, N.D.; Vardi, Y.; Appel, B.; Shechter, A.; Massarwi, O.; Abu-Ghanem, Y.; Gruenwald, I. Low Intensity Shock Wave Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction—How Long Does the Effect Last? J. Urol. 2018, 200, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, E.; Wang, J. A state-of-art review of low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy and lithotripter machines for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2017, 14, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guu, S.J.; Geng, J.H.; Chao, I.T.; Lin, H.T.; Lee, Y.C.; Juan, Y.S.; Liu, C.C.; Wang, C.J.; Tsai, C.C. Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Men with Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Refractory to 3-As Therapy. Am. J. Men’s Health 2018, 12, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zimmermann, R.; Cumpanas, A.; Miclea, F.; Janetschek, G. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome in males: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur. Urol. 2009, 56, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Ruan, Y.; Wu, A.K.; Zaid, U.; Villalta, J.D.; Wang, G.; Banie, L.; Reed-Maldonado, A.B.; Lin, G.; Lue, T.F. Delayed Treatment with Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in an Irreversible Rat Model of Stress Urinary Incontinence. Urology 2020, 141, e181–e187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, C.Y.; Lin, K.L.; Lee, Y.C.; Chuang, S.M.; Lu, J.H.; Wu, B.N.; Chueh, K.S.; Ker, C.R.; Shen, M.C.; Juan, Y.S. Therapeutic effects of Low intensity extracorporeal low energy shock wave therapy (LiESWT) on stress urinary incontinence. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ströher, R.L.M.; Sartori, M.G.F.; Takano, C.C.; de Araújo, M.P.; Girão, M. Metabolic syndrome in women with and without stress urinary incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020, 31, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krhut, J.; Zachoval, R.; Smith, P.P.; Rosier, P.F.; Valansky, L.; Martan, A.; Zvara, P. Pad weight testing in the evaluation of urinary incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2014, 33, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Y.A.; Keith, C.G.; Graziano, C.E.; Davenport, M.T.; Bergeson, R.L.; Christine, B.S.; Morey, A.F. Strong correlation between standing cough test and 24-h pad weights in the evaluation of male stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2020, 39, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tervonen, T.; Karjalainen, K. Periodontal disease related to diabetic status: A pilot study of the response to periodontal therapy in type 1 diabetes. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1997, 24, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Edwan, G.M.; Muheilan, M.M.; Atta, O.N. Long term efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy [ESWT] for treatment of refractory chronic abacterial prostatitis. Ann. Med. Surg. 2017, 14, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harvey, M.A. Pelvic floor exercises during and after pregnancy: A systematic review of their role in preventing pelvic floor dysfunction. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2003, 25, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souders, C.P.; Eilber, K.S.; McClelland, L.; Wood, L.N.; Souders, A.R.; Steiner, V.; Anger, J.T. The Truth behind Transvaginal Mesh Litigation: Devices, Timelines, and Provider Characteristics. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2018, 24, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafik, A. A study of the continence mechanism of the external urethral sphincter with identification of the voluntary urinary inhibition reflex. J. Urol. 1999, 162, 1967–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafik, A.; Shafik, I.A. Overactive bladder inhibition in response to pelvic floor muscle exercises. World J. Urol. 2003, 20, 374–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahoney, C.; Smith, A.; Marshall, A.; Reid, F. Pelvic floor dysfunction and sensory impairment: Current evidence. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2017, 36, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, K.L.; Chou, S.H.; Long, C.Y. Effect of Er:YAG Laser for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 7915813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liedl, B.; Goeschen, K.; Sutherland, S.E.; Roovers, J.P.; Yassouridis, A. Can surgical reconstruction of vaginal and ligamentous laxity cure overactive bladder symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse? BJU Int. 2019, 123, 493–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Timetable designed for the clinical trial of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). LiESWT: Low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy; W0: baseline; W4: 4-week; W8: 8-week; F1: 1-month; F3: 3-month; F6: 6-month; OABSS: Overactive Bladder Symptom Score; ICIQ-SF: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form; UDI-6: Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form; IIQ-7: Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form.
Figure 1.
Timetable designed for the clinical trial of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). LiESWT: Low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy; W0: baseline; W4: 4-week; W8: 8-week; F1: 1-month; F3: 3-month; F6: 6-month; OABSS: Overactive Bladder Symptom Score; ICIQ-SF: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form; UDI-6: Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form; IIQ-7: Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form.
Figure 2.
LiESWT decreased bladder leaks by pad test. (A) Pad test of the studied population for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 4 weeks (W4) in the sham-treated group (N = 15) and the LiESWT-treated group (N = 45). The blue font or red font denotes the p-value before and after 4 weeks of treatment in the sham group or in the LiESWT-treated group. The purple font indicates the p-value between the sham-treated group and the LiESWT-treated group at baseline (W0) and W4. Values are reported as means ± SE. (B) Pad test of the studied population for SUI at W4, 8 weeks (W8), 1-month follow-up (F1), 3-month follow-up (F3), and 6-month follow-up (F6). Values are reported as means ± SE. N = 45. ## p < 0.01 compared to the W0. (C) The percentage of improvement at W4, W8, F1, F3, and F6 after the LiESWT treatment, as normalized with the W0. N = 45.
Figure 2.
LiESWT decreased bladder leaks by pad test. (A) Pad test of the studied population for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 4 weeks (W4) in the sham-treated group (N = 15) and the LiESWT-treated group (N = 45). The blue font or red font denotes the p-value before and after 4 weeks of treatment in the sham group or in the LiESWT-treated group. The purple font indicates the p-value between the sham-treated group and the LiESWT-treated group at baseline (W0) and W4. Values are reported as means ± SE. (B) Pad test of the studied population for SUI at W4, 8 weeks (W8), 1-month follow-up (F1), 3-month follow-up (F3), and 6-month follow-up (F6). Values are reported as means ± SE. N = 45. ## p < 0.01 compared to the W0. (C) The percentage of improvement at W4, W8, F1, F3, and F6 after the LiESWT treatment, as normalized with the W0. N = 45.
Figure 3.
Changes in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms and validated standardized questionnaire scores after the LiESWT treatment. (A) The validated standardized questionnaire scores included the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) Short Form, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) score at week 4 (W4) in the sham group (N = 15) and the LiESWT-treated group (N = 45). The blue font or red font denotes the p-value before and after 4 weeks treatment in the sham group or in the LiESWT-treated group, respectively. The purple font indicates the p-value between the sham group and the LiESWT-treated group at the baseline (W0) and W4. Values are the means ± SE. (B) The OABSS, ICIQ-SF, UDI-6, and IIQ-7 questionnaire scores analyzed at W4, 8 weeks (W8), 1-month follow-up (F1), 3-month follow-up (F3), and 6-month follow-up (F6). Values are the means ± SE. N = 45. ## p < 0.01 compared to the W0.
Figure 3.
Changes in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms and validated standardized questionnaire scores after the LiESWT treatment. (A) The validated standardized questionnaire scores included the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) Short Form, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) score at week 4 (W4) in the sham group (N = 15) and the LiESWT-treated group (N = 45). The blue font or red font denotes the p-value before and after 4 weeks treatment in the sham group or in the LiESWT-treated group, respectively. The purple font indicates the p-value between the sham group and the LiESWT-treated group at the baseline (W0) and W4. Values are the means ± SE. (B) The OABSS, ICIQ-SF, UDI-6, and IIQ-7 questionnaire scores analyzed at W4, 8 weeks (W8), 1-month follow-up (F1), 3-month follow-up (F3), and 6-month follow-up (F6). Values are the means ± SE. N = 45. ## p < 0.01 compared to the W0.
Figure 4.
Short graphic abstract of studying the proposed potential effect of LiESWT. SUI, stress urinary incontinence; LiESWT, low intensity extracorporeal low energy shock wave therapy.
Figure 4.
Short graphic abstract of studying the proposed potential effect of LiESWT. SUI, stress urinary incontinence; LiESWT, low intensity extracorporeal low energy shock wave therapy.
Table 1.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
|---|---|
|
|
OAB: overactive bladder.
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) population.
| Parameter | Sham (Mean ± SE) | LiESWT (Mean ± SE) | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical parameter | |||
| Female age (years) | 52.8 ± 1.9 | 53.8 ± 1.5 | 20–75 |
| Height (cm) | 158.0 ± 1.6 | 158.9 ± 0.9 | |
| Weight (kg) | 59.4 ± 1.9 | 61.2 ± 1.3 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 0.7 | 24.2 ± 0.4 | 18.5–24 |
| Waistline (cm) | 87.2 ± 2.8 | 85.6 ± 1.4 | |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 124.4 ± 3.0 | 121.4 ± 2.9 | 100–120 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 77.9 ± 2.3 | 74.5 ± 1.7 | 60–80 |
| MAP | 93.4 ± 2.3 | 90.1 ± 2.0 | 70–110 |
| Serum parameter | |||
| HbA1C (%) | 5.67 ± 0.12 | 5.63 ± 0.06 | 4–6 |
| AC sugar (mg/dL) | 101.7 ± 3.7 | 101.0 ± 1.6 | 65–109 |
| BUN (mg/dl) | 12.54 ± 0.80 | 12.35 ± 0.45 | 8–20 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 0.44–1.03 |
| GOT(AST) (IU/L) | 22.5 ± 1.0 | 23.5 ± 1.3 | 10–42 |
| GPT(ALT) (IU/L) | 23.8 ± 2.2 | 23.9 ± 2.2 | 10–40 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 92.1 ± 12.3 | 96.9 ± 9.0 | 35–160 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 214.2 ± 8.2 | 203.7 ± 6.7 | 140–200 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 61.5 ± 3.6 | 57.2 ± 2.2 | 29–85 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 134.9 ± 8.3 | 124.9 ± 6.3 | 0–130 |
Note: BMI, body mass index; MAP, mean arterial pressure; HbA1C, hemoglobin A1c (glycated hemoglobin); AC, Ante Cibum (before meals); BUN, blood urea nitrogen; GOT, glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase; GPT, glutamate pyruvate transaminase; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Values are means ± SE. p < 0.05 vs. sham group. N = 15 (Sham) and N = 45 (LiESWT).
Table 3.
Urodynamic parameters and questionnaire score of study population for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Table 3.
Urodynamic parameters and questionnaire score of study population for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
| Parameter | Sham (N = 15) | LiESWT (N = 45) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W0 | W4 | W0 | W4 | W8 | F1 | F3 | F6 | |
| Pad test (g) | 7.94 ± 2.07 | 7.29 ± 2.21 | 7.93 ± 1.32 | 2.43 ± 0.40 ++,## | 2.29 ± 0.78 ## | 1.02 ± 0.28 ## | 1.27 ± 0.54 ## | 1.18 ± 0.38 ## |
| 3-day urinary diary record | ||||||||
| Intake (mL) | 1698.7 ± 127.7 | 1703.2 ± 127.8 | 1757.6 ± 94.3 | 1822.9 ± 94.8 | 1738.2 ± 74.7 | 1678.5 ± 99.4 | 1680.2 ± 89.8 | 1785.1 ± 75.9 |
| Output (mL) | 1795.3 ± 104.6 | 1727.4 ± 126.4 | 1787.6 ± 107.7 | 1845.1 ± 99.8 | 1779.9 ± 86.7 | 1779.5 ± 104.7 | 1886.2 ± 110.4 | 1780.4 ± 70.1 |
| Average voided volume (mL) | 204.6 ± 15.1 | 221.4 ± 15.6 | 212.4 ± 8.9 | 235.5 ± 9.3 | 245.4 ± 9.2 | 245.4 ± 9.9 | 248.9 ± 8.2 # | 249.0 ± 10.2 # |
| Functional bladder capacity (mL) | 376.6 ± 30.9 | 378.4 ± 30.0 | 374.3 ± 16.8 | 393.2 ± 19.7 | 389.6 ± 18.8 | 380.3 ± 19.5 | 400.8 ± 17.6 | 398.4 ± 19.6 |
| Daytime frequency (times) | 8.86 ± 0.50 | 8.00 ± 0.38 | 8.54 ± 0.32 | 8.42 ± 0.33 | 7.98 ± 0.34 | 7.91 ± 0.30 | 8.12 ± 0.29 | 8.12 ± 0.25 |
| Nocturia (times) | 1.00 ± 0.13 | 0.81 ± 0.17 | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 0.82 ± 0.13 | 0.69 ± 0.12 | 0.59 ± 0.12 | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.55 ± 0.11 |
| Urgency (times) | 1.86 ± 0.46 | 1.68 ± 0.51 | 2.09 ± 0.33 | 1.32 ± 0.24 | 1.06 ± 0.22 # | 0.57 ± 0.15 ## | 0.86 ± 0.19 ## | 1.07 ± 0.21 # |
| Uroflowmetry data | ||||||||
| Voided urine volume (mL) | 367.2 ± 38.6 | 378.9 ± 34.9 | 346.4 ± 24.0 | 355.5 ± 25.8 | 394.3 ± 24.4 | 427.0 ± 23.9 # | 433.6 ± 26.4 # | 392.0 ± 24.7 |
| Maximum flow rate (mL/s) | 32.2 ± 3.3 | 33.7 ± 2.9 | 30.1 ± 1.7 | 31.2 ± 2.1 | 33.7 ± 2.4 | 38.0 ± 2.0 # | 36.3 ± 2.2 | 33.1 ± 1.9 |
| PVR (mL) | 50.7 ± 11.5 | 44.3 ± 9.7 | 53.0 ± 5.6 | 35.7 ± 4.3 | 28.3 ± 4.6 # | 27.5 ± 4.1 # | 26.7 ± 5.0 # | 33.5 ± 5.6 |
| Questionnaire score (points) | ||||||||
| OABSS | 6.57 ± 0.68 | 5.31 ± 0.78 | 6.36 ± 0.43 | 4.70 ± 0.44 | 3.65 ± 0.38 ## | 3.49 ± 0.42 ## | 3.83 ± 0.42 ## | 3.66 ± 0.38 ## |
| ICIQ-SF | 11.47 ± 1.14 | 10.08 ± 1.07 | 11.26 ± 0.59 | 7.39 ± 0.56 +,## | 5.96 ± 0.60 ## | 4.06 ± 0.45 ## | 4.73 ± 0.48 ## | 4.75 ± 0.59 ## |
| UDI-6 | 7.63 ± 0.62 | 6.77 ± 1.12 | 7.67 ± 0.48 | 4.63 ± 0.44 +,## | 3.53 ± 0.45 ## | 3.05 ± 0.37 ## | 3.06 ± 0.36 ## | 2.91 ± 0.39 ## |
| IIQ-7 | 8.38 ± 1.30 | 7.00 ± 1.49 | 8.11 ± 0.67 | 4.36 ± 0.52 +,## | 3.07 ± 0.53 ## | 2.19 ± 0.40 ## | 2.67 ± 0.45 ## | 2.52 ± 0.41 ## |
Note: W, week; W4, once per week, 4-week of LiESWT; W8, once per week, 8-week of LiESWT; F1, 1-month follow up; F3, 3-month follow up; F6, 6-month follow up; OABSS, Overactive Bladder Symptom Scores; ICIQ-SF, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire short form; UDI-6, Urinary Distress Inventory, Short Form; IIQ-7, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Short Form. Values are means ± SE. # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01 vs. W0. + p < 0.05; ++ p < 0.01 vs. sham group.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Lin, K.-L.; Chueh, K.-S.; Lu, J.-H.; Chuang, S.-M.; Wu, B.-N.; Lee, Y.-C.; Wu, Y.-H.; Shen, M.-C.; Sun, T.-W.; Long, C.-Y.; et al. Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as a Novel Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Study. Medicina 2021, 57, 947. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57090947
AMA Style
Lin K-L, Chueh K-S, Lu J-H, Chuang S-M, Wu B-N, Lee Y-C, Wu Y-H, Shen M-C, Sun T-W, Long C-Y, et al. Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as a Novel Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Study. Medicina. 2021; 57(9):947. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57090947
Chicago/Turabian StyleLin, Kun-Ling, Kuang-Shun Chueh, Jian-He Lu, Shu-Mien Chuang, Bin-Nan Wu, Yung-Chin Lee, Yi-Hsuan Wu, Mei-Chen Shen, Ting-Wei Sun, Cheng-Yu Long, and et al. 2021. "Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as a Novel Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Study" Medicina 57, no. 9: 947. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57090947
