Next Article in Journal
Safe Handling of Cytotoxics: Guideline Recommendations
Previous Article in Journal
Distribution and Clinical Significance of Tumour-Associated Macrophages in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis in China
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Urologist Referral Delay and Its Impact on Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

1
Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
2
Division of Urology, Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(1), 20-26; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.22.2052
Submission received: 3 November 2014 / Revised: 2 December 2014 / Accepted: 7 January 2015 / Published: 9 February 2015

Abstract

Background: Evidence shows that wait times before bladder cancer surgery have been increasing, and wait time can negatively affect survival. We aimed to determine if a long delay caused by an indirect referral before a first urologist visit affects the survival of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Methods: We analyzed data from 1271 patients who underwent surgery for bladder cancer during the decade 2000–2009. The cohort was obtained by linking two administrative databases in the province of Quebec. Patients were considered to have been directly referred to a urologist if they had 5 or fewer visits with a general practitioner before their first urologist visit; otherwise, they were considered to have been indirectly referred. The effect on survival after surgery of a longer delay before a first urologist visit was assessed using Cox regression models. Results: Median referral delay for the study population was 30 days (56 days for women, 23 days for men; p < 0.0001). Indirect referral was observed for 49% of women and 33% of men. Compared with patients who were directly referred, those who were indirectly referred after first symptoms of bladder cancer experienced poorer survival (hazard ratio: 1.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.52). Women who were indirectly referred had a significant 47% greater risk of death after radical cystectomy. Men who were indirectly referred also experienced decreased survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.25; 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 1.51). Conclusions: Patients indirectly referred to a urologist had an increased risk of mortality after surgery. Compared with men, women had longer wait times and poorer survival.
Keywords: urologist referral delay; bladder cancer; survival; radical cystectomy; cohort study urologist referral delay; bladder cancer; survival; radical cystectomy; cohort study

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, F.; Dragomir, A.; Kassouf, W.; Franco, E.; Aprikian, A. Urologist Referral Delay and Its Impact on Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22, 20-26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.22.2052

AMA Style

Santos F, Dragomir A, Kassouf W, Franco E, Aprikian A. Urologist Referral Delay and Its Impact on Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Current Oncology. 2015; 22(1):20-26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.22.2052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, F., A. Dragomir, W. Kassouf, E. Franco, and A. Aprikian. 2015. "Urologist Referral Delay and Its Impact on Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer" Current Oncology 22, no. 1: 20-26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.22.2052

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop