Next Article in Journal
Perspectives on Treatment Advances for Stage III Locally Advanced Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic Tumour Volume Is Prognostic in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Influencing the Outcome of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Five or More Brain Metastases

by
E. Hamel-Perreault
,
D. Mathieu
and
L. Masson-Cote
*
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26(1), 64-69; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.25.4244
Submission received: 6 November 2018 / Revised: 3 December 2018 / Accepted: 13 January 2019 / Published: 1 February 2019

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with 5 or more brain metastases (BMets) is a matter of debate. We report our results with that approach and the factors influencing outcome. Methods: In the 103 patients who underwent SRS for the treatment of 5 or more BMets, primary histology was non-small-cell lung cancer (57% of patients). All patients were grouped by Karnofsky performance status and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification. In our cohort, 72% of patients had uncontrolled extracranial disease, and 28% had stable or responding systemic disease. Previous irradiation for 1–4 BMets had been given to 56 patients (54%). The mean number of treated BMets was 7 (range: 5–19), and the median cumulative BMets volume was 2 cm3 (range: 0.06–28 cm3). Results: Multivariate analyses showed that stable extracranial disease (p < 0.001) and RPA (p = 0.022) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Moreover, a cumulative treated BMets volume of less than 6 cm3 (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.54; p = 0.006; 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 4.99) was associated with better OS. The total number of BMets had no effect on survival (p = 0.206). No variable was found to be predictive of local control. The RPA was significant (p = 0.027) in terms of distant recurrence. Conclusions: Our study suggests that SRS is a reasonable option for the management of patients with 5 or more BMets, especially with a cumulative treatment volume of less than 6 cm3.
Keywords: brain metastasis; stereotactic radiosurgery; Gamma Knife; multiple brain metastases; central nervous system; radiation oncology brain metastasis; stereotactic radiosurgery; Gamma Knife; multiple brain metastases; central nervous system; radiation oncology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamel-Perreault, E.; Mathieu, D.; Masson-Cote, L. Factors Influencing the Outcome of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Five or More Brain Metastases. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 64-69. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.25.4244

AMA Style

Hamel-Perreault E, Mathieu D, Masson-Cote L. Factors Influencing the Outcome of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Five or More Brain Metastases. Current Oncology. 2019; 26(1):64-69. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.25.4244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamel-Perreault, E., D. Mathieu, and L. Masson-Cote. 2019. "Factors Influencing the Outcome of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Five or More Brain Metastases" Current Oncology 26, no. 1: 64-69. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3747/co.25.4244

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop