Next Article in Journal
Consumption Loan Augmented Divisia Monetary Index and China Monetary Aggregation
Previous Article in Journal
Firm Performance during COVID-19 Pandemic: Does Ownership Identity Matter? Evidence from Indonesia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Tour Operator Market—The Case of Slovakia

Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Kosice, Nemcovej 32, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(10), 446; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jrfm15100446
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 29 September 2022 / Published: 2 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Tourism: Economics, Finance and Management)

Abstract

:
The aim of the research is to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (and subsequent state aid) on selected financial indicators of tour operators operating on Slovakia’s market. The article analyses the changes in the market between 2018 and 2020 (market concentration, insolvency insurance). For the purposes of describing the financial position of tour operators, the medians of selected financial indicators were processed. At the same time, a two-sample t-test was used to test the hypotheses of the medians of these indicators for tour operators with a valid insolvency protection contract and without such a contract. The Herfindahl–Hirschman index was used to quantify the impact of the pandemic on the tour operator market concentration ratio. The state aid provided prevented tour operators from going bankrupt. Based on the Herfindahl–Hirschman index, we can say that there was an increase in concentration in this market. At the same time, however, there was a decline in profitability and an increase in their Liabilities to Assets ratio. However, currently insured tour operators do not have higher values of these indicators. These data are important for the discussion on the legal regulation of the protection of tour operators against insolvency.

1. Introduction

The measures taken in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic (Gössling et al. 2020; Seyfi et al. 2020; Shortall et al. 2022; Vărzaru et al. 2021) had a serious impact on the functioning of tour operators (Vila et al. 2021) and the insolvency protection. For example, there have been changes in dealing with tour operator insolvency in Germany. After Thomas Cook declared bankruptcy and the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, a new law was approved on 25 June 2021 (law on insolvency insurance by travel insurance funds and amending travel regulations). From 1 November 2021, a guarantee fund (Deutscher Reisesicherungsfonds) has operated there to ensure possible insolvency. The original insurance or bank guarantee remains valid only for tour operators with a turnover of less than EUR 10 million per year.
Since the outbreak of the pandemic (González-Torres et al. 2021), tour operators have been forced to cancel scheduled package tours and stays at a moment’s notice, although many of these tours had already been paid fully or in part by tour operators to foreign providers of tourism services. Given the functioning of this sector (Oroian and Gheres 2012; Panasiuk 2021), tour operators are forced to pay advances (advance payments) to individual tourism service providers (The European Travel Agents’ and Tour Operators’ Associations 2021, October) to ensure a sufficient number of air and accommodation capacities abroad. Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic (Farzanegan et al. 2021) and the impossibility to use these services due to closed borders or the impossibility to travel, tour operators were not able to use the aforesaid advance payments, and these were not refunded to them by foreign entities (The Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic 2021a, September). On 1 April 2020, the Parliament of the Slovak Republic adopted Act No. 66/2020 Coll., stipulating that the closure of an employer’s establishment due to a decision of a government agency or due to the declaration of a state of emergency means an obstacle to work on the employer’s part. As a result, an employee who could not work for those reasons was entitled to compensation in the amount of 80% of his/her average monthly earnings, but not less than the minimum wage. A special aid scheme from the Ministry of Labor, Social Affairs, and Family of the Slovak Republic was used to cover those costs.
The aim of the research is to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (and subsequent state aid) on the selected financial indicators (ROE, ROA, Profit margin, Gross margin) of tour operators operating on Slovakia’s market. Part of the aid was provided in the form of repayable loans (through the state-owned Slovak Guarantee and Development Bank, a joint stock company). Therefore, the development of the Liabilities to Assets ratio is also analyzed. At the same time, the article analyses changes in the size of companies (based on sales) in relation to the market in which they operated between 2018 and 2020. The aim is to quantify how the measures in question were reflected in the degree of competition (Page and Connell 2020) between them (in market concentration). Another of the analyzed impacts is an increase in the number of tour operators having no insolvency protection contract. The last objective is, therefore, to compare the financial indicators of companies that had such protection before the outbreak of the pandemic (March 2020) with those of companies that still have such protection, i.e. at the time of publication of data by The Slovak Trade Inspection (2021, 27 October).

2. Materials and Methods

A list of tour operators operating in the Slovak Republic is maintained by The Slovak Trade Inspection (2021, 27 October). This authority is in charge of supervising tour operators. The analysis focuses on companies (limited liability companies and joint stock companies) that already had insolvency protection arranged before the outbreak of the pandemic under Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements. The number of evaluated tour operators operating on the market was 214 in 2018, 224 in 2019, and 222 in 2020. The financial indicators (ROE, ROA, Profit margin, Gross margin, Liabilities to Assets) of these companies for 2018 to 2020 were taken from the database of companies of FinStat, a limited liability company (n.d.). These data were processed as of 1 June 2022. As of that date, summary data from the register of financial statements for 2021 were not available (only data for 134 tour operators were available). To quantify the impact of the pandemic on the ratio of concentration in the market of tour operators operating in Slovakia, the Herfindahl–Hirschman index for 2018 to 2020 (e.g., Brezina et al. 2016; Chang et al. 2019; Krivka 2016; Nauenberg et al. 1997) was used. In particular, tour operators that had a contract providing insolvency protection in March 2020 (and currently do not have such insurance) were compared with tour operators that still have such insurance (The Slovak Trade Inspection 2021, 27 October). The above financial indicators for 2020 were compared. After performing a two-tailed F-test for dispersion, a t-test was performed. Hypotheses of the medians of financial indicators (ROE, ROA, Profit margin, Gross margin, Liabilities to Assets) for these two groups of tour operators were tested on its basis at the level of significance α = 0.05. The null hypothesis (H0) assumes that the median of individual financial indicators of tour operators that have protection against insolvency is less than or equal to the median of individual financial indicators of tour operators that have currently no contract. As an alternative hypothesis (HA), a one-tailed t-test was used to test the assumption that the tour operators currently having an insolvency protection contract had higher ROE, ROA, Profit margin, Gross margin, and Liabilities to Assets values in the first pandemic year (2020).

3. Results and Discussion

Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the tour operators had to cancel the scheduled package tours due to the impossibility of them taking place, or the package tours were cancelled by the clients themselves due to fears of travelling abroad (Table 1). To regulate the situation that had arisen, Act No. 136/2020 Coll. and amending Act No. 170/2018 Coll. on package travel, linked travel arrangements, and certain conditions of engaging in the tourism business were adopted (Jurčová and Varga 2021). The amendment to the Package Travel Act was intended, on the one hand, to provide protection for consumers whose package tours could not take place in the upcoming future due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and, on the other hand, to set acceptable conditions for tour operators in providing compensation or refunds for cancelled package tours. In the event of the impossibility for package travel to take place as a result of the declaration of an emergency situation due to the COVID-19 disease in the Slovak Republic or a similar situation at the destination or at any point of the travel route, the tour operators had the right to send the client, after an unsuccessful proposal to change the package travel contract, a notification of substitute package travel that had to be agreed with the traveler by 31 August 2021 at the latest. Unless the tour operator agreed with the traveler on the provision of substitute package travel by 31 August 2021, the operator was deemed to have withdrawn from the package travel contract. At the same time, it was obliged to refund the traveler all payments received under the package travel contract without delay, but not later than 14 September 2021. The state aid scheme to ensure the liquidity of tour operators in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic was provided through the state-owned Slovak Guarantee and Development Bank, a joint stock company. Aid beneficiaries could only be tour operators who issued substitute package travel notifications and/or refunded advance payments for cancelled package tours to the so-called protected group of clients. The Ministry of Finance earmarked EUR 65 million for this purpose. Refundable aid for tour operators was payable within four years and could not exceed 25% of a company’s total sales in 2019. Tour operators also had a preferential interest rate throughout the period—small and medium-sized enterprises at a rate of 0.49% and large enterprises at a rate of 1.01% (The Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic 2021a, September; The Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic 2021b, September).
The de minimis aid scheme covered the period from 1 April 2020 to 31 May 2021 and from 1 September 2021 to 31 December 2021. The aim of the aid was to support undertakings and facilities in the tourism sector by providing subsidies intended to cover part of the fixed costs that eligible applicants had to incur at the time of their forced closure due to the measures of the government and of the Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic and after the resumption of their business when the negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic manifested themselves. The aid was intended to compensate applicants for the damage suffered as a direct consequence of the measures taken to mitigate the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The total budget available for the de minimis aid scheme was EUR 220,250,000 after the increase. The aid was provided in the respective budget year within the budget chapter of the provider (the Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic). The financing took the form of a subsidy to compensate for the loss of recognized net sales in the eligible period, compared to the achieved net sales in the financing period. The legal basis for the provision of state aid under this scheme to support undertakings in the tourism sector in the Slovak Republic during the crisis situation declared in connection with the COVID-19 disease was Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1407/2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid. Decreased sales in the individual months covered by de minimis aid calls were compared with the same months of 2019. The maximum amount of de minimis aid granted to a single undertaking could not exceed EUR 200,000 during the period covering the current fiscal year and the two preceding fiscal years. The amount of a decrease in net sales had to be more than 40%. An undertaking could apply for aid under this scheme also separately for specific individual months. The amount of a subsidy granted to tour operators was 6% of the above difference between sales in the given month in 2020 (or 2021) and sales in the same month in 2019 (The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic 2021a, August; The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic 2022, February).
The state aid scheme to support undertakings in the tourism sector in connection with the outbreak of the COVID-19 disease, the so-called large scheme, covered the period from 1 April 2020 to 31 May 2021 and from 1 September 2021 to 31 December 2021. The aim of the aid was to support undertakings in the tourism sector by providing subsidies intended to cover part of the fixed costs that the undertakings had to incur at the time of their forced closure or restriction of their business due to the measures of the Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic and after the resumption of their business when the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the functioning of tourism undertakings manifested themselves. The maximum subsidy granted to a single undertaking was EUR 1 million (from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021), EUR 200,000 (from 1 April 2021 to 31 May 2021), and EUR 400,000 (from 1 September 2021 to 31 December 2021). The total budget to support undertakings in the tourism sector in connection with the outbreak of the COVID-19 disease was planned at EUR 90,000,000 (EUR 70 million in 2021 and EUR 20 million in 2022), using the state budget funds. Eligible applicants included undertakings which had been affected by the measures and had recognized a decrease in net sales of at least 40% or more during the eligible period, compared to the reference period. In their applications, the applicants were required to specify the months for which they had already received a subsidy from the de minimis aid scheme. Due to cumulative measures, these months were further excluded from the overall calculation. The applicants were eligible to receive a subsidy, provided that the cumulative decrease in their sales in the eligible period of the given year, compared to the cumulative sales of the reference period of the given fiscal year, was at least 40%. The method of calculation and the percentage of subsidies granted to tour operators were the same as in the case of the de minimis aid scheme (The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic 2021b, December).
The COVID-19 pandemic caused no significant change in the number of tour operators operating in the market (The Slovak Trade Inspection 2021, 27 October). According to data from The Slovak Trade Inspection (2021, 27 October), in 2020 and 2021, several tour operators did not conclude package travel contracts and linked travel arrangement contracts with travelers in their own name or suspended their tour operator business at their own request. This affected the value of the Herfindahl–Hirschman index (Table 2).
The decline in the number of clients in 2020 was reflected in selected financial indicators of tour operators (Table 3). In 2020, 137 tour operators ended up in the red. For comparison, out of those operating in this market, in 2019 there were 55 and in 2018 there were 41 undertakings which were recognized to be in the red. Pompurová et al. (2021) and Derco (2018) dealt with the situation of tour operators before the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The financial situation resulted in the fact that as of 27 October 2021, 134 tour operators operating in the Slovak market had package travel insolvency insurance (The Slovak Trade Inspection 2021, 27 October). Such insolvency protection is stipulated by Section 9 of Act 170/2018 on package travel, linked travel arrangements, and certain conditions of engaging in the tourism business under Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements (Article 17). Tour operators were required to conclude an insolvency protection contract so as to cover all package travel and linked travel arrangements sold during its term. Based on the results of the t-test (Table 4), we can state that at the level of significance α = 0.05 we do not reject the H0 hypothesis, even in relation to any of the financial indicators (ROE, ROA, Profit margin, Gross margin, Liabilities to Assets).

4. Conclusions

The critical state of the tourism sector also had significant macroeconomic impacts (Matzana et al. 2022). Being a sector based on services regarded as having the highest value added in terms of the state budget, it is not only a significant source of public funds, but also affects other companies given the cross-cutting nature of the sector (The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic 2021b, December).
In 2020 to 2021, two tour operators were declared bankrupt, and two tour operators ended up in liquidation (FinStat, a limited liability company n.d.). In this respect, the state aid provided prevented tour operators from going bankrupt. Due to the lack of data from other European countries (Gomes and Oliveira 2021; Hedija and Kuncová 2018; Plzáková and Smeral 2022; Zaninović and Host 2021), comparative research should be focused on comparing government support and impacts on the tour operator industry (Bolton 2022; Kvítková and Petru 2021a, 2021b; Pompurová et al. 2022).
The insurance companies on the market (which offer this product) assessed the risks according to their own parameters (Hedija et al. 2017) and did not extend the insolvency insurance for some tour operators (The Slovak Trade Inspection 2021, 27 October). After the expiry of the insurance contract, they could no longer operate on the market as tour operators. The European Travel Agents’ and Tour Operators’ Associations (2021, October) also stressed the need to open a debate on insolvency protection. The total insurance capacity of tour operators’ insolvency insurance decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the enormous increase in risks in the tourism industry. It is currently difficult for insurance companies to obtain reinsurance capacity for this product (Ulrych 2021). The conditions are affected by the situation in the common European market (Ioannides 2020; Puławska 2021). There are lower capacities of reinsurers for this segment, stricter requirements for insurance companies, and higher prices for tour operators (Ulrych 2021). The approval of the guarantee fund would be an alternative to this insurance (Faure and Weber 2013; Halbhuber and Hondius 1996). This fund is supplementary protection to insurance against insolvency (European Commission 2021) in the Czech Republic and Germany (a mixed system). Further research should focus on the prices of tour operators’ insolvency insurance. Such a focus would be interesting for comparing the relationship between risk assessment and the current financial situation of these enterprises.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bolton, Karl. 2022. The Impact of COVID-19 on Group Tour Operators and the Implications for Overtourism. In Global Strategic Management in the Service Industry: A Perspective of the New Era, 1st ed. Edited by Saloomeh Tabari and Wei Chen. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 139–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brezina, Ivan, Juraj Pekár, Zuzana Čičková, and Marian Reiff. 2016. Herfindahl-Hirschman index level of concentration values modification and analysis of their change. Central European Journal of Operations Research 24: 49–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chang, Hai-Yen, Li-Heng Liang, and Hui-Fun Yu. 2019. Market power, competition and earnings management: Accrual-based activities. Journal of Financial Economic Policy 11: 368–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Derco, Jan. 2018. Financial position of the tour operators in the Slovak Republic. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal 66: 476–79. [Google Scholar]
  5. European Commission. 2021. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0090&from=EN (accessed on 15 July 2022).
  6. Farzanegan, Mohammad R., Hassan F. Gholipour, Mehdi Feizi, Robin Nunkoo, and Amir E. Andargoli. 2021. International tourism and outbreak of coronavirus (COVID-19): A cross-country analysis. Journal of Travel Research 60: 687–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Faure, Michael G., and Franziska Weber. 2013. Security mechanisms for insolvencies in the package travel sector: An economic analysis. Journal of Consumer Policy 36: 425–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. FinStat, a limited liability company. n.d. Database of Companies. Available online: https://finstat.sk/ (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  9. Gomes, Conceição, and Fernanda Oliveira. 2021. The tourism intermediaries’ profitability in Portugal and Spain—Differences and similarities. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. González-Torres, Thais, José-Luis Rodríguez-Sánchez, and Eva Pelechano-Barahona. 2021. Managing relationships in the Tourism Supply Chain to overcome epidemic outbreaks: The case of COVID-19 and the hospitality industry in Spain. International Journal of Hospitality Management 92: 102733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gössling, Stefan, Daniel Scott, and C. Michael Hall. 2020. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 29: 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Halbhuber, Harald, and Ewould Hondius. 1996. Guarantee funds for the travel industry: Protection of the consumer against the insolvency of his organizer/retailer. Journal of Consumer Policy 19: 305–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hedija, Veronika, and Martina Kuncová. 2018. Assessment of the financial health of the Czech tour operators. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration 25: 53–66. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hedija, Veronika, Roman Fiala, and Martina Kuncová. 2017. Is profitability a good proxy for efficiency? Evidence from the subsector of tour operators. Review of Economic Perspectives 17: 425–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ioannides, Michalis. 2020. Insurance Risk Management during Pandemics. In A New World Post COVID-19: Lessons for Business, the Finance Industry and Policy Makers, 1st ed. Edited by Monica Billio and Simone Varotto. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari—Digital Publishing, pp. 245–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jurčová, Monika, and Peter Varga. 2021. Refund for Cancelled Travel During the Pandemic: Commission Decides to Refer Slovakia to the Court of Justice. Folia Turistica 57: 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Krivka, Algirdas. 2016. On the concept of market concentration, the minimum Herfindahl-Hirschman index, and its practical application. Panoeconomicus 63: 525–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kvítková, Zuzana, and Zdenka Petru. 2021a. Vouchers as a result of Corona virus and the risks for tour operators and consumers. Journal of Innovative Business and Management 13: 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kvítková, Zuzana, and Zdenka Petru. 2021b. COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and consequences for the tour operators: Case of the Czech Republic. Studia Turistica 12: 55–69. [Google Scholar]
  20. Matzana, Velisaria, Aikaterina Oikonomou, and Michael Polemis. 2022. Tourism Activity as an Engine of Growth: Lessons Learned from the European Union. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15: 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nauenberg, Eric, Kisalaya Basu, and Harish Chand. 1997. Hirschman-Herfindahl index determination under incomplete information. Applied Economics Letters 4: 639–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oroian, Maria, and Marinela Gheres. 2012. Developing a risk management model in travel agencies activity: An empirical analysis. Tourism Management 33: 1598–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Page, Stephen J., and Joanne Connell. 2020. Travel intermediaries: Tour operators and agents. In Tourism, 5th ed. Edited by Stephen J. Page and Joanne Connell. London: Routledge, pp. 134–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Panasiuk, Aleksander. 2021. Marketing Orientation of Entities on the Tourism Market. Sustainability 13: 12040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Plzáková, Lucie, and Egon Smeral. 2022. Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on European tourism. Tourism Economics 28: 91–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pompurová, Kristína, Ľubica Sebova, and Petr Scholz. 2022. Reimagining the tour operator industry in the post-pandemic period: Is the platform economy a cure or a poison? Cogent Business & Management 9: 2034400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pompurová, Kristína, Ľubica Šebová, Ján Šebo, Marta Valihorová, and Alena Kaščáková. 2021. The State of Tour Operators in Slovakia before the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ekonomicky Casopis 69: 975–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Puławska, Karolina. 2021. Financial stability of European insurance companies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14: 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Seyfi, Siamak, C. Michael Hall, and Bardia Shabani. 2020. COVID-19 and international travel restrictions: The geopolitics of health and tourism. Tourism Geographies, ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shortall, Ruth, Niek Mouter, and Van B. Wee. 2022. COVID-19 passenger transport measures and their impacts. Transport Reviews 42: 441–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. The European Travel Agents’ and Tour Operators’ Associations. 2021. Reforming Package Travel Law in a Post-Pandemic World. October. Available online: https://www.ectaa.org/Uploads/documents/Reforming-Package.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  32. The Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic. 2021a. The State aid Scheme to Ensure the Liquidity of Tour Operators in Connection with the COVID-19 Pandemic. September. Available online: https://www.mfsr.sk/files/archiv/77/SchemastatnejpomocinazabezpecenielikviditycestovnychkancelariivsuvislostispandemiouochoreniaCOVID-19_SA.64415.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  33. The Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic. 2021b. A Call for Applications for the Grant of Financial Aid to Ensure the Liquidity of Tour Operators. September. Available online: https://www.mfsr.sk/files/archiv/39/Vyzvanapredkladanieziadostioposkytnutiefinancnejpomociprecestovnekancelarie.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  34. The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic. 2021a. The de Minimis Aid Scheme to Support Undertakings in the Tourism Sector in Connection with the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Disease, as Amended by Amendment 2. August. Available online: https://www.mindop.sk/cestovnyruch/schema-pomoci-de-minimis (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  35. The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic. 2021b. The State Aid Scheme to Support Undertakings in the Tourism Sector in Connection with the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Disease, as Amended by Amendment 1. December. Available online: https://www.mindop.sk/schema-pomoci/schema-statnej-pomoci-tzv-velka-schema/schema-statnej-pomoci-sa-62256-2021-n (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  36. The Ministry of Transport and Construction of the Slovak Republic. 2022. The de Minimis Aid Scheme to Support Undertakings in the Tourism Sector in Connection with the Outbreak of the COVID-19 Disease, as Amended by Amendment 2. February. Available online: https://www.mindop.sk/schema-pomoci/schema-statnej-pomoci-de-minimis-za-obdobie-od-1-9-2021-do-31-12-2021/schema-pomoci-de-minimis-v-etapa-pdf-673kb-54020 (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  37. The Slovak Trade Inspection. 2021. List of Tour Operators. October 27. Available online: https://www.soi.sk/sk/zoznam-cestovnych-kancelarii/zoznam-cestovnych-kancelarii.soi?ind= (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  38. The Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic. 2022. Tourism. DATACube. June. Available online: http://datacube.statistics.sk/#!/lang/en (accessed on 22 June 2022).
  39. Ulrych, P. Manuel. 2021. Pojištění insolvence hrozí konec. Zachrání ho pojišťovny? [Insolvency Insurance Is in Danger of Termination. Will the Insurance Companies Save It?]. Celyoturismu.cz. Available online: https://celyoturismu.cz/pojisteni-insolvence-hrozi-konec-zachrani-ho-pojistovny/ (accessed on 15 June 2022).
  40. Vărzaru, Anca Antoaneta, Claudiu George Bocean, and Marian Cazacu. 2021. Rethinking tourism industry in pandemic COVID-19 period. Sustainability 13: 6956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vila, Noelia Araújo, Diego R. Toubes, and Lucília Cardoso. 2021. Travel agencies: A sector hit by the COVID-19 crisis. In Risk, Crisis, and Disaster Management in Small and Medium-Sized Tourism Enterprises, 1st ed. Edited by Diego R. Toubes and Noelia Araújo-Vila. Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 236–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zaninović, Vinko, and Alen Host. 2021. Determinants of Operating Revenues: Travel Agencies vs Tour Operators in European Union. In Tourism Management and Sustainable Development, 1st ed. Edited by Goran Karanovic, Persefoni Polychronidou, Anastasios Karasavvoglou and H. Maskarin Ribaric. Cham: Springer, pp. 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Performance figures of tour operators in Slovakia in 2018 to 2021.
Table 1. Performance figures of tour operators in Slovakia in 2018 to 2021.
Indicator2018201920202021
Number of personsInbound tourism387,834331,19325,38432,040
Outbound tourism676,968691,68650,808143,195
Domestic tourism 68,84275,73551,44153,361
Days of stayInbound tourism573,770476,75270,69252,960
Outbound tourism5,124,5094,969,461339,3811,062,746
Domestic tourism351,312377,020222,734226,899
Average length of stayInbound tourism1.51.42.81.7
Outbound tourism7.67.26.77.4
Domestic tourism5.15.04.34.3
Total tourism revenues in thousand EUR752,131.39749,078.9398,658.97214,089.01
Revenues from inbound tourism in thousand EUR40,815.1028,829.765656.437572.66
Revenues from outbound tourism in thousand EUR694,851.62701,393.7380,804.64190,793.19
Revenues from domestic tourism in thousand EUR16,464.6618,855.4412,197.9015,723.15
Package travel sales in thousand EUR398,929.00422,332.8054,325.60129,102.42
Commissions from the sale of package tours in thousand EUR55,711.3728,189.874878.757647.33
Other revenues in thousand EUR297,491.01298,556.2539,454.6377,339.25
Table 2. Herfindahl–Hirschman index.
Table 2. Herfindahl–Hirschman index.
201820192020
515.29532.53477.64
Source: own processing.
Table 3. Selected indicators of tour operators in 2016 to 2020.
Table 3. Selected indicators of tour operators in 2016 to 2020.
Indicator 20162017201820192020
ROE1st quartile0.010.030.040.00−0.65
median 0.170.220.160.13−0.04
3rd quartile0.420.520.380.350.12
ROA1st quartile0.000.010.010.00−0.23
median 0.030.050.050.03−0.04
3rd quartile0.120.160.100.090.03
Profit margin1st quartile0.000.000.000.00−0.46
median 0.010.020.010.01−0.05
3rd quartile0.030.050.040.040.03
Gross margin1st quartile0.050.050.050.04−0.34
median 0.090.100.100.09−0.02
3rd quartile0.180.160.160.170.10
Liabilities to Assets1st quartile0.520.500.520.500.48
median 0.780.730.750.750.81
3rd quartile0.940.920.920.931.00
Source: own processing based on data from the database of companies of FinStat, a limited liability company.
Table 4. Results of the t-Test (Two-Sample).
Table 4. Results of the t-Test (Two-Sample).
ROEROAProfit MarginGross MarginLiabilities to Assets
t Stat−1.248061.584531.01940−0.055931.37336
P(T ≤ t) one-tail0.107420.057360.154680.477730.08689
t Critical one-tail1.659781.652831.653221.653181.66571
Source: processed by the author.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Derco, J. The Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Tour Operator Market—The Case of Slovakia. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15, 446. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jrfm15100446

AMA Style

Derco J. The Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Tour Operator Market—The Case of Slovakia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022; 15(10):446. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jrfm15100446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Derco, Ján. 2022. "The Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Tour Operator Market—The Case of Slovakia" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15, no. 10: 446. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jrfm15100446

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop