Next Article in Journal
Strong Disturbance Impact of Tropical Cyclone Lionrock (2016) on Korean Pine-Broadleaved Forest in the Middle Sikhote-Alin Mountain Range, Russian Far East
Next Article in Special Issue
Eutypella parasitica and Other Frequently Isolated Fungi in Wood of Dead Branches of Young Sycamore Maple (Acer pseudoplatanus) in Slovenia
Previous Article in Journal
Variability in Mixed Conifer Spatial Structure Changes Understory Light Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pseudodidymella fagi in Slovenia: First Report and Expansion of Host Range
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Emerging Pathogen from Rotted Chestnut in China: Gnomoniopsis daii sp. nov.

The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 23 October 2019 / Revised: 11 November 2019 / Accepted: 11 November 2019 / Published: 13 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Pathogens in Forest Ecosystems)

Abstract

:
Nut quality is fundamental to the economic viability of the Chinese sweet chestnut industry, but fruit rot disease significantly reduces this quality. In this study, we investigated chestnut rot in Anhui and Hubei provinces in China. Typical brown rot symptoms were observed, affecting nuts from different plantations. Isolates were obtained from symptomatic tissues of rotted fruits that were identified based on morphological comparison and phylogenetic analyses of partial internal transcribed spacer (ITS), and tef1 and tub2 gene sequences. The inoculation results showed that the tested fungal species is pathogenic to chestnut fruits. Hence, a new and severe pathogen that causes Chinese sweet chestnut brown rot, Gnomoniopsis daii sp. nov., is introduced herein.

1. Introduction

China has the largest chestnut industry in the world, producing more than 2 × 106 tons of chestnuts annually since 2013 [1]. The Chinese sweet chestnut (Castanea mollissima Bl.) is widely cultivated in most provinces in China, providing gluten-free, low fat, and cholesterol-free crop nuts for human consumption [2]. Chestnut orchards and stands are also important to the economy as sources of timber [3].
Traditionally, several pathogens were considered the causal agents of chestnut rot in China, including Alternaria Nees, Botryosphaeria Ces. & De Not., Colletotrichum Corda, Diaporthe Nitschke, Fusarium Link, and Penicillium Link species [4,5,6,7]. However, no detailed studies on these pathogens have been conducted in China in the past decade. European sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.), known as one of the four major chestnut species in the world, has been well studied in nut rot by several phytopathologists and taxonomists [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Several important fungal species, Cryphonectria parasitica M.E. Barr, Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi L.A. Shuttlew., E.C.Y. Liew & D.I. Guest (syn. G. castaneae Tamietti), Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands, and Sirococcus castanea J.B. Mey., Senn-Irlet & T.N. Sieber, have been reported on Castanea sativa from Australia and Europe [16,17,18,19,20].
The genus Gnomoniopsis Berl. (Gnomoniaceae G. Winter, Diaporthales Nannf.) was first described as a subgenus within Gnomonia Ces. & De Not. for species having ascospores that develop additional septa [21]. However, the development of additional septa was thought to be an occasional occurrence; Gnomoniopsis was subsequently proposed as a synonym of Gnomonia [22]. Sogonov et al. reevaluated concepts of the leaf-inhabiting genera in Gnomoniaceae based on the DNA sequence data of these genera, and restricted the genus Gnomoniopsis to G. chamaemori Berl. (type), G. comari Sogonov, G. fructicola Sogonov, G. macounii Sogonov, G. paraclavulata Sogonov, G. racemula Sogonov, and G. toementillae Sogonov [21]. Subsequently, nine additional species were added to this genus [23]. Gnomoniopsis castaneae and G. smithogilvyi were described independently from Europe and Australia, but Shuttleworth et al. proved that both names refer to a single species based on a comparative morphological analysis and five-marker phylogenetic analysis [18].
During the surveys of chestnut rot conducted in Anhui and Hubei provinces in China, typical brown rot symptoms were observed (Figure 1). Our aim in this study was to identify pathogens associated with chestnut brown rot in China. We conducted pathogenicity tests on healthy nuts to assess their pathogenicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Isolation

Anhui and Hubei provinces are two important chestnut production bases in China. Samples were randomly collected in local storehouses from different chestnut plantations after harvest, then packed in paper bags, and posted to the laboratory for further study. Rotted chestnuts were surface-sterilized for 1 min in 75% ethanol, 3 min in 1.25% sodium hypochlorite, and 1 min in 75% ethanol, then rinsed for 2 min in sterile water and blotted on dry sterile filter paper. Infected nut tissues were cut into small pieces (0.2 cm × 0.2 cm) using a sterile scalpel and transferred onto the surface of malt extract agar (MEA; 30 g malt extract, 5 g peptone, 15 g agar/L; Aobox Company Limited, Beijing, China). After inoculation, agar plates were left at 25 °C in the dark for 2 days. Then, single hyphal strands were transferred to fresh medium plates under a dissecting stereomicroscope with a sterile needle. Specimen of the new species was deposited in the Museum of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China (BJFC). The ex-type culture was maintained in the China Forestry Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China (CFCC).

2.2. DNA Extraction and Phylogenetic Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from 15-day-old mycelium grown on MEA using the CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) method [24]. DNA sequences were generated for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions including the 5.8S gene of the ribosomal RNA operon amplified with primers ITS1/ITS4 [25], the translation elongation factor 1a (tef1) amplified with primers EF1-728F/EF1-1567R [26], and the b-tubulin gene 2 (tub2) amplified with primers T1/Bt2b [27]. The PCR conditions were: initial denaturation step of 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 50 s at 48 °C (ITS) or 54 °C (tef1) or 52 °C (tub2), and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final elongation step of 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR amplification products were scored visually by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel. The DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI Prism 3730xl DNA Analyzer (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) with Big-Dye Terminator kit v.3.1 (Invitrogen, Beijing, China) at Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China).
Sequences of the three individual loci (ITS, tef1 and tub2) were aligned and edited manually using MEGA6 (Table 1). Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was used for phylogenetic inferences of the concatenated alignments. ML analysis was implemented on the CIPRES Science Gateway portal using RAxML-HPC BlackBox v. 8.2.10 based on single ITS and combined sequences of ITS, tef1, and tub2 [28]. The resulting trees were plotted using FigTree v. 1.4.2.

2.3. Morphological Identification and Characterization

Morphological descriptions of the new Gnomoniopsis species were based on cultures sporulating on MEA in the dark at 25 °C after a month. Micromorphological features were observed under a Leica compound microscope (DM 2500, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). More than 50 conidia were randomly selected for measurement. Cultural characteristics of isolates incubated on MEA were observed and recorded, including colony color and texture.

2.4. Pathogenicity Trials

Four isolates representing Gnomoniopsis daii were selected for inoculations, viz., CMF002A (ex-type from Anhui province), CMF002B (from Anhui province), CMF095 (from Hubei province), and CMF098 (from Hubei province). Isolates were allowed to grow on MEA for one week at 25 °C before the tests. We collected 160 asymptomatic nuts from a chestnut orchard in Anhui province, and 10 of them were randomly chosen and dissected to confirm healthy status. The remaining 150 chestnuts were surface-sterilized for 1 min in 75% ethanol, 3 min in 1.25% sodium hypochlorite, and 1 min in 75% ethanol, then rinsed for 2 min in sterile water and blotted on dry sterile filter paper. Using a cork borer (7 mm diameter), we wounded the nuts by removing the seed coat to expose the seed. Same-sized gar discs were removed from the actively growing margins of cultures and placed into the wounds with the mycelium facing the exposed seed. Sterile MEA discs were used for the negative controls. Wounds with the inoculated mycelium or sterile MEA were covered with masking tape to prevent contamination and desiccation. We ran 30 replicates for each strain and negative control. These inoculated nuts were maintained in a greenhouse at 25 °C. After 15 days, all the replicates were examined for disease, and re-isolations were conducted for all the symptomatic nuts.

3. Results

3.1. Fungal Isolation and Identification

Most of the pieces from infected nut tissue yielded a fungus, and 125 isolates were obtained. The isolates were primarily identified based on the morphology of conidia formed on the plates and ITS sequences. As a result, four isolates were Alternaria, six isolates were Botryosphaeria, 53 isolates were Colletotrichum, seven isolates were Diaporthe, 42 isolates were Gnomoniopsis, 11 isolates were Fusarium, and two isolates were Penicillium. Only one fungus was obtained from one rotted chestnut. For the first time in China, Gnomoniopsis isolates were obtained from rotted chestnut. Hence, detailed studies on them were conducted during the present study.

3.2. Phylogeny

To identify the phylogenetic position of our isolates within Gnomoniopsis, phylogenetic analyses were performed based on ITS and combined ITS, tef1, and tub2 sequence data. The ITS alignment contained 38 sequences (including one outgroup) with 542 characters including alignment gaps. Of these, 428 characters were constant, 34 were variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 80 were parsimony-informative. The six Gnomoniopsis strains from this study form a well-supported clade distinguished from known species (Figure 2). The combined ITS, tef1, and tub2 alignment contained 38 sequences (including one outgroup) and 1685 characters including alignment gaps; 960 of these were parsimony-informative, 174 were variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 551 were constant. A similar phylogram was obtained from multi-genes to single ITS (Figure 3), which indicated strains from this study as a new Gnomoniopsis species. All 42 Gnomoniopsis isolates were identical in our primary comparison; hence, the six are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.

3.3. Morphology and Taxonomy

Gnomoniopsis daii C.M. Tian & N. Jiang, sp. nov. (Figure 4 and Figure 5)
MycoBank MB 833088
Holotype: BJFC-C005
Etymology: in honor of Fanglan Dai, who is one of the most famous Chinese taxonomists.
Host/Distribution: on rotted Castanea mollissima fruits in China.
Original description: Colonies on MEA attaining 60 mm in one week at 25 °C, with undulate margin, whitish; after one month at 25 °C, light orange to white conidiomata distributed irregularly on the surface. Pycnidia globose to oval, solitary or confluent, light orange to white, 150–950 μm diameter; conidiophores indistinct, often reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells oval, hyaline, one-celled, 5–18 µm. Conidia oval, oblate, fusiform, straight to slightly curved, hyaline, finely guttulate or not, (5.0–)5.5–7.0(–8.0) × 2.0–3.5 µm.
Material examined: CHINA, Anhui province, Liuan city, on rotted fruits of Castanea mollissima, Ning Jiang and Chengming Tian, 7 October 2017 (BJFC-C005 holotype; ex-type culture, CMF002A = CFCC 54043); Liuan city, on rotted fruits of Castanea mollissima, Ning Jiang and Chengming Tian, 7 October 2017 (living culture, CMF002B). Hubei province, Huanggang city, on rotted fruits of Castanea mollissima, Ning Jiang and Chengming Tian, 20 September 2019 (living culture, CMF095, CMF098, CMF099, CMF116).
Notes: Gnomoniopsis daii has similar conidia to G. smithogilvyi (5.0–8.0 × 2.0–3.5 µm in Gnomoniopsis daii vs. 6.1–9.8 × 2.4–4.9 µm in G. smithogilvyi), but they are different in host species and distribution (Gnomoniopsis daii on Castanea mollissima in China vs. G. smithogilvyi on Castanea sativa in Europe) [18]. They are obviously separated in the phylogram base on ITS (Figure 2) and combined ITS, tef1, and tub2 (Figure 3).

3.4. Pathogenicity Trials

All 10 nuts assayed to test their health were found to be intact. The four tested strains showed brown rot symptoms and were detected in 83% of the artificially infected nuts (Figure 6). No obvious differences were found among the four strains (Table 2). Re-isolates were obtained from affected nuts and identified based on ITS sequence, which were all Gnomoniopsis daii. The asymptomatic nuts and negative controls did not show any symptoms.

4. Discussion

In this paper, Gnomoniopsis daii is introduced as a new species in the genus Gnomoniopsis. This species was found to be an emerging causal agent of chestnut brown rot in Anhui and Hubei provinces in China. Identification for describing the fungus as a new taxon was based on the results of phylogenetic analyses of sequence data for combined ITS and tef1 and tub2 genes, as well as the morphological characteristics. However, only the asexual state of Gnomoniopsis daii was discovered from rotted seeds of chestnut trees.
The related species of Gnomoniopsis daii, G. smithogilvyi, has been reported to cause serious disease on Castanea sativa and C. crenata × C. sativa hybrids in Europe and Oceania [13,19]. The infection process and cycle of chestnut disease has been demonstrated, and ascospores of G. smithogilvyi from chestnut buds are key to causing fruit rot [11,13]. The pathogen was later isolated from cankers on stems and branches [11,13]. However, we did not discover the sexual morph of Gnomoniopsis daii on the chestnut bud during this study.
Gnomoniopsis species inhabited three families of host, viz., Fagaceae, Rosaceae, and Onagraceae [18,20,23]. Gnomoniopsis daii, G. smithogilvyi, G. clavulata, and G. paraclavulata were discovered from Fagaceae trees and formed a close phylogenetic relationship differing from other species (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi was first reported as a nut rot pathogen [8]. Subsequently, the authors isolated this fungus from chestnut branches [13]. Gnomoniopsis daii was described as a novel pathogen of chestnut rot disease in China depending on its asexual state. Gnomoniopsis clavulata and G. paraclavulata were collected from overwintered leaves belonging to Quercus species in the form of sexual states [21]. These two species were only reported in the USA [21]. Conidial size can only barely separate these four close species (5.0–8.0 × 2.0–4.0 µm in G. clavulata vs. 5.0–8.0 × 2.0–3.5 µm in G. daii vs. 6.0–9.5 × 2.0–3.5 µm in G. paraclavulata vs. 4.9–9.8 × 2.9–4.9 µm in G. smithogilvyi) [8,20,23], but the combined evidence of host species, distribution, and molecular data (ITS, tef1, and tub2) clearly distinguishes these related species.
During our pathogenicity test, we confirmed that Gnomoniopsis daii also causes chestnut brown rot. Hence, this Gnomoniopsis species represents the second species in this genus infecting Castanea hosts. Castanea is an important plant genus worldwide, so it is necessary to further research the fundamental aspects of the relationship between the pathogen genus Gnomoniopsis and host genus Castanea.
Accurate identification and diagnostics of fungal pathogens are important for determining the disease cycle and route of transmission. As an emergent disease agent in chestnut orchards in China, chestnut tree loss appears to be closely associated with Gnomoniopsis nut rot. Further studies should focus on methods to prevent increased damage to this valuable crop tree.

5. Conclusions

A novel fungal species, Gnomoniopsis daii, is an emerging pathogen causing Chinese sweet chestnut brown rot in China.

Author Contributions

Experiments: N.J.; writing—original draft preparation: N.J.; writing—review and editing: N.J. and C.T.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Committee, grant number 31670647.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the assistance of Yingmei Liang (Museum of Beijing Forestry University), Chungen Piao and Minwei Guo (China Forestry Culture Collection Center) during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yi, S.J. Situation and development strategy of chestnut industry in China. J. West China For. Sci. 2017, 46, 132–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, C.; Guo, S.J. Analysis on the nutritional characters and comprehensive evaluation of 16 chestnut germplasm resources. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2017, 37, 357–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, J.R.; Liu, M.C.; Yang, L.; Min, Q.W. Factors affecting the willingness of farmers to accept eco-compensation in the Qianxi chestnut agroforestry system, Hebei. J. Resour. Ecol. 2018, 9, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, W.; Shen, R.X.; Wang, X.J. Pathogenicity of pathogens contributing to dry rot of Chinese chestnut and their infection process. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2001, 23, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
  5. He, W.; Yin, W.L.; Shen, R.X.; Wang, X.J. Latent infection of fungal pathogens and pathogenesis of Chinese chestnut seed rot. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2004, 40, 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hou, B.L.; Zhang, Z.M.; Yang, X.M.; Shang, J.L.; Xu, F.S.; Ma, C.F. The study on the kernel spot diseases of Chinese chestnut in Hebei. J. Hebei Agric. Univ. 1988, 11, 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhu, J.R.; Lian, Y.Y.; Hua, Z.Y. Preliminary exploration into the cause of Chinese chestnut putrity in storage. J. Zhejiang For. Technol. 1992, 12, 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  8. Crous, P.W.; Summerell, B.A.; Shivas, R.G.; Burgess, T.I.; Decock, C.A.; Dreyer, L.L.; Granke, L.L.; Guest, D.I.; Hardy, G.E.St.J.; Hausbeck, M.K.; et al. Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 107–127. Persoonia 2012, 28, 138–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dennert, F.G.; Broggini, G.A.; Gessler, C.; Storari, M. Gnomoniopsis castanea is the main agent of chestnut nut rot in Switzerland. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2015, 54, 199–211. [Google Scholar]
  10. Linaldeddu, B.T.; Deidda, A.; Scanu, B.; Franceschini, A.; Alves, A.; Abdollahzadeh, J.; Phillips, A.J.L. Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae, Diatrypaceae and Gnomoniaceae associated with branch diseases of hazelnut in Sardinia (Italy). Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2016, 146, 259–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pasche, S.; Calmin, G.; Auderset, G.; Crovadore, J.; Pelleteret, P.; Mauch-Mani, B.; Barja, F.; Paul, B.; Jermini, M.; Lefort, F. Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi causes chestnut canker symptoms in Castanea sativa shoots in Switzerland. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 87, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Seddaiu, S.; Cerboneschi, A.; Sechi, C.; Mello, A. Gnomoniopsis castaneae associated with Dryocosmus kuriphilus galls in chestnut stands in Sardinia (Italy). IFOREST 2017, 10, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shuttleworth, L.A.; Guest, D.I. The infection process of chestnut rot, an important disease caused by Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales) in Oceania and Europe. Australas. Plant. Pathol. 2017, 46, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shuttleworth, L.A.; Liew, E.C.Y.; Guest, D.I. Survey of the incidence of chestnut rot in south-eastern Australia. Australas. Plant. Pathol. 2013, 42, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Şimşek, S.A.; Katircioğlu, Y.Z.; Serçe, Ç.U.; Çakar, D.; Rigling, D.; Maden, S. Phytophthora species associated with dieback of sweet chestnut in Western Turkey. For. Pathol. 2019, 49, e12533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meyer, J.B.; Trapiello, E.; Senn-Irlet, B.; Sieber, T.N.; Cornejo, C.; Aghayeva, D.; González, A.J.; Prosperoa, S. Phylogenetic and phenotypic characterisation of Sirococcus castaneae comb. nov. (synonym Diplodina castaneae), a fungal endophyte of European chestnut. Fungal Biol. UK 2017, 121, 625–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rigling, D.; Prospero, S. Cryphonectria parasitica, the causal agent of chestnut blight: Invasion history, population biology and disease control. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2018, 19, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shuttleworth, L.A.; Walker, D.M.; Guest, D.I. The chestnut pathogen Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales) and its synonyms. Mycotaxon 2016, 130, 929–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Trapiello, E.; Feito, I.; González, A.J. First Report of Gnomoniopsis castaneae Causing Canker on Hybrid Plants of Castanea sativa× C. crenata in Spain. Plant. Dis. 2018, 102, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Visentin, I.; Gentile, S.; Valentino, D.; Gonthier, P.; Tamietti, G.; Cardinale, F. Gnomoniopsis castanea sp. nov.(Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales) as the causal agent of nut rot in sweet chestnut. J. Plant. Pathol. 2012, 94, 411–419. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sogonov, M.V.; Castlebury, L.A.; Rossman, A.Y.; Mejía, L.C.; White, J.F. Leaf-inhabiting genera of the Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales. Stud. Mycol. 2008, 62, 1–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Barr, M.E. The Diaporthales in North America with emphasis on Gnomonia and its segregates. Mycol. Mem. 1978, 7, 1–232. [Google Scholar]
  23. Walker, D.M.; Castlebury, L.A.; Rossman, A.Y.; Sogonov, M.V.; White, J.F. Systematics of genus Gnomoniopsis (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales) based on a three gene phylogeny, host associations and morphology. Mycologia 2010, 102, 1479–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  25. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. Guide Methods Appl. 1990, 18, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  26. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar]
  28. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Symptoms of chestnut brown rot: (a,b) diseased nuts and (c) discolored kernels.
Figure 1. Symptoms of chestnut brown rot: (a,b) diseased nuts and (c) discolored kernels.
Forests 10 01016 g001
Figure 2. Consensus tree resulting from a RAxML analysis of ITS sequence alignment for species of Gnomoniopsis. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.
Figure 2. Consensus tree resulting from a RAxML analysis of ITS sequence alignment for species of Gnomoniopsis. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.
Forests 10 01016 g002
Figure 3. Consensus tree resulting from a RAxML analysis of combined ITS, tef1, and tub2 sequence alignment for species of Gnomoniopsis. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.
Figure 3. Consensus tree resulting from a RAxML analysis of combined ITS, tef1, and tub2 sequence alignment for species of Gnomoniopsis. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per site.
Forests 10 01016 g003
Figure 4. Gnomoniopsis daii (BJFC-C005 from CMF002A) cultures on MEA. (a,b) Colony on MEA after 15 days at 25 °C; (c,d) conidiomata formed on MEA.
Figure 4. Gnomoniopsis daii (BJFC-C005 from CMF002A) cultures on MEA. (a,b) Colony on MEA after 15 days at 25 °C; (c,d) conidiomata formed on MEA.
Forests 10 01016 g004
Figure 5. Morphology of Gnomoniopsis daii (BJFC-C005 from CMF002A): (ac) conidiogenous cells with attached conidia and (d,e) conidia.
Figure 5. Morphology of Gnomoniopsis daii (BJFC-C005 from CMF002A): (ac) conidiogenous cells with attached conidia and (d,e) conidia.
Forests 10 01016 g005
Figure 6. Results of pathogenicity trials after 15 days: (a–d) Mild to severe symptoms caused by CMF002A (ex-type), (e) asymptomatic chestnut after incubation, and (f) negative control.
Figure 6. Results of pathogenicity trials after 15 days: (a–d) Mild to severe symptoms caused by CMF002A (ex-type), (e) asymptomatic chestnut after incubation, and (f) negative control.
Forests 10 01016 g006
Table 1. Isolates and GenBank accession numbers used in this study.
Table 1. Isolates and GenBank accession numbers used in this study.
SpeciesCountryHostStrainGenBank Accession Number
Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS)tub2tef1
Apiognomonia venetaFrancePlatanus occidentalisCBS 342.86DQ313531EU219235DQ318036
Gnomoniopsis alderdunensisUSARubus pedatusCBS 125679GU320826GU320788GU320813
Gnomoniopsis alderdunensisUSARubus parviflorusCBS 125680GU320825GU320787GU320801
Gnomoniopsis alderdunensisUSARubus parviflorusCBS 125681GU320827GU320789GU320802
Gnomoniopsis chamaemoriFinlandRubus chamaemorusCBS 804.79GU320817GU320777GU320809
Gnomoniopsis clavulataUSAQuercus falcataCBS 121255EU254818EU219211GU320807
Gnomoniopsis comariFinlandComarum palustreCBS 806.79EU254821EU219156GU320810
Gnomoniopsis comariFinlandComarum palustreCBS 807.79EU254822GU320779GU320814
Gnomoniopsis comariSwitzerlandComarum palustreCBS 809.79EU254823GU320778GU320794
Gnomoniopsis daiiChinaCastanea mollissimaCMF002AMN598671MN605519MN605517
Gnomoniopsis daiiChinaCastanea mollissimaCMF002BMN598672MN605520MN605518
Gnomoniopsis daiiChinaCastanea mollissimaCMF095MN598673NANA
Gnomoniopsis daiiChinaCastanea mollissimaCMF098MN598674NANA
Gnomoniopsis daiiChinaCastanea mollissimaCMF099MN598675NANA
Gnomoniopsis daiiChinaCastanea mollissimaCMF116MN598676NANA
Gnomoniopsis fructicolaUSAFragaria vescaCBS 121226EU254824EU219144GU320792
Gnomoniopsis fructicolaFranceFragaria sp.CBS 208.34EU254826EU219149GU320808
Gnomoniopsis fructicolaUSAFragaria sp.CBS 125671GU320816GU320776GU320793
Gnomoniopsis guttulataBulgariaAgrimonia eupatoriaNAEU254812NANA
Gnomoniopsis idaeicolaUSARubus sp.CBS 125672GU320823GU320781GU320797
Gnomoniopsis idaeicolaUSARubus pedatusCBS 125673GU320824GU320782GU320798
Gnomoniopsis idaeicolaFranceRubus sp.CBS 125674GU320820GU320780GU320796
Gnomoniopsis idaeicolaUSARubus procerusCBS 125675GU320822GU320783GU320799
Gnomoniopsis idaeicolaUSARubus procerusCBS 125676GU320821GU320784GU320811
Gnomoniopsis macouniiUSASpiraea sp.CBS 121468EU254762EU219126GU320804
Gnomoniopsis occultaUSAPotentilla sp.CBS 125677GU320828GU320785GU320812
Gnomoniopsis occultaUSAPotentilla sp.CBS 125678GU320829GU320786GU320800
Gnomoniopsis occultaRussiaPotentilla anserinaNAEU254811NANA
Gnomoniopsis paraclavulataUSAQuercus albaCBS 123202GU320830GU320775GU320815
Gnomoniopsis racemulaUSAChamerion angustifoliumCBS 121469EU254841EU219125GU320803
Gnomoniopsis sanguisorbaeSwitzerlandSanguisorba minorCBS 858.79GU320818GU320790GU320805
Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyiAustraliaCastanea sp.CBS 130190JQ910642JQ910639KR072534
Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyiAustraliaCastanea sp.CBS 130189JQ910644JQ910641KR072535
Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyiAustraliaCastanea sp.CBS 130188JQ910643JQ910640KR072536
Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyiItalyCastanea sativaMUT 401HM142946KR072532KR072537
Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyiNew ZealandCastanea sativaMUT 411HM142948KR072533KR072538
Gnomoniopsis tormentillaeSwitzerlandPotentilla sp.CBS 904.79EU254856EU219165GU320795
Sirococcus castaneaeSwitzerlandCastanea sativaCBS 142041KX929744KX958443KX929710
Note: NA, not applicable. Strains in this study are identified in bold.
Table 2. Results of pathogenicity trials.
Table 2. Results of pathogenicity trials.
StrainNo. of Affected Nuts No. of Asymptomatic Nuts
CMF002A264
CMF002B246
CMF095228
CMF098237

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, N.; Tian, C. An Emerging Pathogen from Rotted Chestnut in China: Gnomoniopsis daii sp. nov. Forests 2019, 10, 1016. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f10111016

AMA Style

Jiang N, Tian C. An Emerging Pathogen from Rotted Chestnut in China: Gnomoniopsis daii sp. nov. Forests. 2019; 10(11):1016. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f10111016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Ning, and Chengming Tian. 2019. "An Emerging Pathogen from Rotted Chestnut in China: Gnomoniopsis daii sp. nov." Forests 10, no. 11: 1016. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f10111016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop