Next Article in Journal
X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) Scanning Is a Non-Destructive and Modern Technique to Identify and Assess the Characteristics of Armillaria solidipes Pathogen Infections in Poplar Roots
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of the International Competitiveness of Forest Products in Top Exporting Countries Using the Deviation Maximization Method with Increasing Uncertainty in Trading
Previous Article in Journal
The Macroeconomic Implications of the Transition of the Forestry Industry towards Bioeconomy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Financial Revenues from Timber Harvesting in Secondary Cloud Forests: A Case Study from Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Toledo-Aceves et al. Financial Revenues from Timber Harvesting in Secondary Cloud Forests: A Case Study from Mexico. Forests 2022, 13, 1496

by
Tarin Toledo-Aceves
1,2,*,
Sven Günter
2,
Manuel R. Guariguata
3,
Martín García-Díaz
1 and
Eliza Zhunusova
2
1
Red de Ecología Funcional, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Carretera Antigua a Coatepec No. 351, El Haya, Xalapa 91073, Veracruz, Mexico
2
Thünen Institute of Forestry, 21031 Hamburg, Germany
3
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Av. La Molina 1895, Lima 15026, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Accepted: 2 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Production, Trade and Consumption of Wood-Based Products)

Text Correction

There was an error in the original publication [1]. There was an error in the decimals reported for the mean annual increment. The correct estimated value is 3.78 m3 ha−1 year−1.
A correction has been made to Section 2.2, Paragraph 3:
The estimated MAI (excluding remnant trees) was 3.78 m3 ha−1 year−1 and, based on this estimate and a 30% harvesting intensity, a 7.3 year cutting cycle was determined (return interval in years between timber harvests in the same area; Appendix C).
A correction has been made to Section 2.4, Paragraph 5:
Based on the MAI estimated from the standing volume excluding the remnant trees (3.78 m3 ha−1 year−1), with harvesting intensities of 10%, 17%, 20% and 30%, the cutting cycles estimated were 2.2, 3.8, 4.6 and 7.3 years, respectively (Appendix C).
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Toledo-Aceves, T.; Günter, S.; Guariguata, M.R.; García-Díaz, M.; Zhunusova, E. Financial Revenues from Timber Harvesting in Secondary Cloud Forests: A Case Study from Mexico. Forests 2022, 13, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Toledo-Aceves, T.; Günter, S.; Guariguata, M.R.; García-Díaz, M.; Zhunusova, E. Correction: Toledo-Aceves et al. Financial Revenues from Timber Harvesting in Secondary Cloud Forests: A Case Study from Mexico. Forests 2022, 13, 1496. Forests 2022, 13, 1962. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13111962

AMA Style

Toledo-Aceves T, Günter S, Guariguata MR, García-Díaz M, Zhunusova E. Correction: Toledo-Aceves et al. Financial Revenues from Timber Harvesting in Secondary Cloud Forests: A Case Study from Mexico. Forests 2022, 13, 1496. Forests. 2022; 13(11):1962. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13111962

Chicago/Turabian Style

Toledo-Aceves, Tarin, Sven Günter, Manuel R. Guariguata, Martín García-Díaz, and Eliza Zhunusova. 2022. "Correction: Toledo-Aceves et al. Financial Revenues from Timber Harvesting in Secondary Cloud Forests: A Case Study from Mexico. Forests 2022, 13, 1496" Forests 13, no. 11: 1962. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13111962

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop