Next Article in Journal
The Complexity of Space Utilization and Environmental Pollution Control in the Main Corridor of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Qualities and Sustainable Approach to Heritage of the City. The Coastal Strip in Gdańsk, Poland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Key Elements for the Design of a Wine Route. The Case of La Axarquía in Málaga (Spain)

by
Elena Cruz-Ruiz
1,
Gorka Zamarreño-Aramendia
2,* and
Elena Ruiz-Romero de la Cruz
2
1
Department of Economics and Business Administration, University Málaga, 29013 Málaga, Spain
2
Department of Economic Theory and Economic History, University Málaga, 29013 Málaga, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(21), 9242; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12219242
Submission received: 1 September 2020 / Revised: 31 October 2020 / Accepted: 4 November 2020 / Published: 6 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Tourism, Culture, and Heritage)

Abstract

:
The design of enotourist routes represents an opportunity for the sustainable development of rural territories. This qualitative study was structured in three parts to reach a cohesion model representing the academic literature, visitors, and winemakers. This research focused on the region of La Axarquía in Málaga (Spain) because of its wine and tourist tradition. In relation to the methodology, this study used content analysis techniques for the analysis of both the relevant literature and the questionnaires completed by all the winemakers of the territory, 60 tourists who visited the wineries, and the 10 most representative agents linked to the tourist development of this region. The findings provided a model with the elements to be taken into account in the creation of a wine route or itinerary in any destination of the world. The application of this model will contribute to the creation of new tourist policies that can move towards efficient progress of the region.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Economically profitable and sustainable activities should be part of the new models for the development of rural territory based on different patterns of tourism demand. In this sense, it has been observed that there is a rejection of standardisation and a growing interest in local products such as wine and gastronomy [1,2]. Particular consideration should be given to origin-linked wines, which are now transforming the experience of this tourist segment [2,3].
The 2008 crisis has had a negative impact on many towns and villages in Spain. Many regions need to boost their development and recover their identities. Heritage and landscape wealth along with services are gaining significance in the context of the current thrust towards sustainable development [4,5,6]. Wines with appellation of origin contribute to generating quality tourism [7,8], making possible other additional incomes to the agricultural community [9] and representing an interesting way for the development of rural territories [10].
The origin of wine routes in Spain is unknown, since wine has been a basic good in the Mediterranean culture, and circuits around quality wines have always existed [4]. Recently, the 25th anniversary of the beginning of the wine tourism model created by the Spanish Association of Wine Cities (ACEVIN) was commemorated. This association works with the Ministry of Industry and Commerce and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food in order to promote the culture and wine tourism. It currently has 30 certified routes, constituting a model of public and private collaboration [11,12].
Early studies have their origin in certain areas widely known for their wines. As an example we can mention the cases of La Rioja [13,14], the Jerez area [14], Aragón [15], the County of Huelva [8], the Canary Islands [16], Marco de Jerez-Sherry [17,18], Montilla–Moriles [19,20,21,22], Ribera del Duero [23,24], Valencia [25], Ribeiro [26], and Málaga [10].
There is a growing interest among tourists in products that preserve the environment and the landscape [27]. These products are gaining a prominent role in the economy of rural environments due to their ability to revalue the destinations, thanks to their emotional, identity-related, environmental, and recreational richness [28,29,30]. Additionally, the services associated with wine tourism should take into account the opinions of wine tourists. For this reason, their identification will be crucial for the success of the entire experience. In this way, they generate value at multiple points before, during, and after the winery visit [31].
The research is focused on the province of Málaga and, more specifically, on the region of La Axarquía (Figure 1). The potential of the wine routes is of great value, and their origins date back to Phoenician and Roman times. Other outstanding features are the region’s culture, landscape, and history [11]. Its wines are protected with the designation of origin Málaga (MPDO), Sierras de Málaga, and Pasas de Málaga, integrating the three designations into a single Regulatory Council.
This region has its own identity within the framework of the Málaga Designation of Origin [32] and can benefit from a tourist projection, because of its proximity to the eastern Costa del Sol [33].
The creation of an enotourist route as a factor of revitalisation of the rural territories is an opportunity for sustainability and development. The aim of this article is to provide an approach to the elements that are basic in the development of the rural territory dedicated to viticulture. For this reason, this case study analysed the academic proposals and the responses to the interviews conducted with the different stakeholders. There are tourists who spontaneously visit certain spaces due to the attraction of their wineries, wines, and heritage. In this sense, it is necessary to propose a model that includes the most important elements for the creation of an enotourist route where the criteria of efficiency, profitability and sustainability prevail.
From there, it will be observed whether these elements exist in La Axarquía, and if they, in the opinion of the experts, constitute an opportunity to create an itinerary. First, to structure our proposal, a study of the elements present in the academic literature was carried out. Second, the interviews revealed the needs and opinions of a group of stakeholders made up of winery representatives and political and social leaders. Finally, the tourists visiting these cellars were interviewed with identical questions to test if this conjunction of interests could exist between the demand and the offer of the wine tourism product.
On the basis of the above, it was possible to specify key elements that bring together the contribution of the state of the art and the perspective of the interviewees. The elements that appear in the proposal can be applied to other destinations that have wine as a tourist attraction, especially in territories that, like La Axarquía, enjoy a millenary tradition in wine culture. La Axarquía is a territory of reduced dimensions, which has always had an important resource in wine, and today it can be revalued with a certified wine route, with the elements recognised in the state of the art. It is true that this circumstance is a limitation of our study; however, the important thing is not the size of the territory. The important thing is that it has sufficient elements to favour the development of tourism based on the quality provided by the wine routes, taking into account the opinions of the respondents.

2. State of the Art

Wine tourism involves the possibility of an influx of travellers, where the trips and stays of the visitors are focused on getting to know the landscapes and spaces where wine is produced, as well as carrying out activities that increase the knowledge about this product and generate development in the wine-producing areas [34]. Enotourism has become one of the fields that has been able to adapt more quickly to the tourist panorama in the last decades. The development of new tourist modalities beyond the traditional vacation period has favoured the creation of new models that have as main elements the natural environments and the local traditions [35,36,37]. This tourism segment has developed worldwide, from Europe, in countries such as France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Germany, Serbia, Romania, or Georgia [17,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44], to—and more intensely—the USA, Canada, South Africa, and New Zealand [45,46,47], or in emerging areas [48,49].
Wine routes are defined as those circuits that delimit the itineraries in a geographical area, with all the spaces that motivate tourists on their journey being duly signposted. The concept of wine tourism can be observed from three different approaches: as a consumer behaviour, as a regional development strategy, and as an opportunity for the wineries to market their products directly to the final consumer [46]. Taking the consumer’s perspective, the wine routes are defined by the vineyards, wineries, festivals, and shows of a given producing region [47]. These routes highlight the wineries as the main element, to which is added, whenever possible, information on monuments and other cultural representations of interest to visitors [14]. Based on these elements, some authors have outlined wine tourism routes that start from an integrating and sustainable perspective with the rural environment [50,51,52].
Some concepts such as “terroir” or landscape were taken from geography [53]. This has contributed to making the definition of wine tourism more complete. In this way, the territory is the starting point for the development of the enotourist proposal. The terroir is conceived as that space that has a series of climatic and soil conditions where the vineyards are developed [54]. In this sense, the tourist attraction, the typology, and the quality of the wines will depend directly on the terroir. Linked to the terroir is the concept of the wine landscape. Geographers defined it as the set of characteristics of a wine-producing area, including the vineyards, the type of wine-producing activity related to the orography, the accidents of the terrain, and the presence of cellars where the wine is produced and stored. This definition was quickly incorporated into the literature and is widely used in wine tourism [55,56,57,58].
Wine tourism and gastronomy appear linked on most of the occasions [59,60,61,62], being a binomial that defines many of the routes set up in Europe. To these we must add the heritage attractions of the wine-producing areas [63,64]. These aspects are not alien to wine routes in other parts of the world, where even the attractions offered by the wine landscape, gastronomy, and terroir have been exploited more efficiently [65,66,67]. The increased interest in visits to production areas has created synergies between wineries, hotel businesses, and accommodation owners [68,69]. In many cases, the wineries offer a complementary range of services, from the gastronomic experience to accommodation [39,63,70]. In this way they end up becoming elements of the dynamisation of the territory.
The challenge of designing a sustainable enotourist route on the basis of an integrated management of all the interests that converge in this type of tourist offer has been approached from different points of view [52]. Sustainability is not only understood as an economic concept. In the last few years the wine routes have begun to be understood as a model of sustainable development whereby it is possible to value and protect the heritage of the rural areas [71,72,73].

Elements Involved in the Design of Enotourist Itineraries

The existence of wineries is basic for the promotion of wine tourism [14,39,74,75,76,77,78,79]. Wine can enhance tourism, as it has the effect of creating a desire to travel to the origin where it is produced [80]. Researchers have found that the primary interest of wine tourists is to taste and buy wine [81,82,83,84]. They also pay particular attention to the activity that takes place within the cellar [14,74,76,77,85,86].
It is necessary to recognise and identify the gastronomic, social, ecological, historical, landscape, and technical values as elements to be taken into account in the rural economy [9,15,87]. The Baeza Charter provides a mechanism to plan and classify elements [88]. It is a tool that can be applied to any agricultural landscape and especially to wineries [14,35,89,90]. In this document, several levels of elements can be distinguished: tangible or material heritage, which includes movable goods, singular real estate and joint real estate; intangible or immaterial heritage, where traditional crafts and gastronomy are found; and, finally, natural and genetic heritage, where the characteristics of the physical environment and the types of grapes are included [9].
Elements such as architecture, historic buildings [91], and museums [35,92] should be taken into account. They represent what [15]. Tourist destinations and wine regions contain combinations of elements, highlighting the necessary facilities and services for the creation of attractive wine tourism routes for the visitors [84,93]. The services offered in addition to the wine cellars also seem to be an important incentive for the tourist visits, highlighting the accommodation, the catering services, and the wine cellars, as well as the existence of tourist service enterprises and information centers [9,92].
Accommodation possibilities, especially those related to agrotourism, are very attractive [9,55,77,92,94] because they favour the conversion of the economic activity into a sustainable one [95]. The accommodation offer is reinforced by the restaurants where the local foods can be tasted [1,9,15,75,78,92,96].
Wineries can serve as an incentive to the visitors [9,79], as well as the companies that offer tourist experiences related to the enotourist visit [9,35,92,97,98]. Moreover, the possibility of receiving information about the route is another aspect indicated as necessary [39,78,79,92].
Visiting a wine region implies the existence of motivation for wine consumption. Obviously, there are secondary motivations such as socialisation, learning about wine culture, or enjoying rural areas and nature [55,75,90,96,99]. In all of them, the wine landscape as well as the events and festivities play a special role [55,75,79,92,97,98].
The characteristics of the destination also cover activities not directly related to wine [100], especially gastronomy and celebrations [55,75,79,93,97,98].
Table 1 shows authors whose studies focused on the creation of enotourist routes. Special attention is paid to the elements that each author identifies as necessary for the creation or the existence of a route.
This study aims to answer the following research questions:
Q1. What are the most important elements involved in the creation of a wine route, according to winemakers’ perceptions?
Q2. What are the most important elements involved in the creation of a wine route, according to social agents’ perceptions?
Q3 What are the most important elements involved in the creation of a wine route, according to tourists’ perceptions?
Q4 Are these elements present in the geographical area of La Axarquía?

3. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted in three steps using the technique of content analysis, according to Wimmer and Dominick [101]. This in-depth review of the literature was carried out in order to obtain the most important elements in the creation of an enotourist route. This exploration was carried out through the analysis of certain key words (e.g., Wine Route, Oenoturism, Wine Tourism, Material Heritage, Traditional Architecture, Landscape, Museum, Wine, Gastronomy, Food, Wine festivals, festivities, Crafts, Cellar, Winery, Demand, Signage, Leisure, Climate, Weather, Services, local products), using the bibliographic reference manager Mendeley and performing a search of relevant articles present in the Web of Science and SCOPUS.
A second step was the completion of a structured questionnaire with open questions [102,103,104,105]. The questionnaire was designed by a team belonging to the SEJ 121 research group Mediterráneo Económico of the University of Málaga. It was structured in a single section of 10 questions (the questionnaire can be consulted in Appendix A), including relevant aspects, according to the elements considered in the existing literature, on studies that have analysed other wine tourism routes and itineraries in Spain. Dillon et al. [106] pointed out that the questions should be able to convey how they relate to issues raised in the research. Repeating the same questions to groups of interviewees allows them to be collected in data organised in such a way that they can be analysed collectively.
The questionnaires were completed by 100% of the winemakers on several visits to the wineries. These were concentrated in eight municipalities. Vélez Málaga and Competa hosted two wineries and the rest were distributed in the nearby towns of Árchez, Colmenar, Moclinejo, Sayalonga, Sedeya, and Torrox. Similarly, a representative group of agents involved in the development of tourism in La Axarquía was invited to complete the questionnaire. Ten responses were collected from institutional representatives, managers of public and private companies, and other entities, which represented 70% of the institutional sector present in the territory of La Axarquía.
The study was completed by a third set of questionaries conducted with a group of 60 wine tourists who were visiting the wineries at the same time as the researchers were conducting the field study. Since the research sought to establish certain aspects of the enotourist offer, the vision of the enotourist was complementary and worked as a sample of convenience, which verified that the elements indicated by the winemakers and the stakeholders were of interest to them.
To avoid problems of understanding and interpreting the data, a pilot study was carried out on a sample of two members of each group. This study showed that no changes were needed to the questionnaire. All the respondents participating in this research gave their consent to being a part of this study.
The research was conducted between April and November 2019 (see Table 2). Subsequently, a qualitative analysis of the data obtained using the NVivo software was carried out. This software stands out for being a tool capable of automating non-numerical data such as interviews, surveys, and textual content, and thus helping researchers [107] in the treatment of qualitative data by allowing the elaboration of models through intersection matrices [108].

Territoriy under Study

The research focused on the province of Málaga and, more specifically, on the region of La Axarquía. The potential of the wine routes is of great value and their origins date back to Phoenician and Roman times. Other outstanding features are its culture, landscape, and history [11]. Its wines are protected with the designation of origin Málaga (MPDO), Sierras de Málaga, and Pasas de Málaga, integrating the three designations into a single Regulatory Council. The Málaga wine route was recently certified [11].
The territory of La Axarquía is located in the eastern part of the province of Málaga. It has a total surface of 1026.7 km2. The Mediterranean Sea borders it on the coast in the south, while in the north and east we can find the province of Granada; in the west, it borders the capital of Málaga and the regions of Antequera and Noroma [109]. It has a peculiar physiognomy, orography, farming systems, and diversity of landscapes and resources. The average altitude of the region is 391 m. This territory is characterised by steep slopes that alternate with open areas. It is currently made up of 31 municipalities and up to 67 districts. The total population in the last municipal census amounted to 214,188 inhabitants, with Vélez-Málaga being the most populated town with 81,643 inhabitants [110].
This is a territory that, in spite of being historically recognised by its wine tradition [111], needs a change of growth model. This region has its own identity within the framework of the Málaga Designation of Origin [32] and can benefit from a tourist proposal, due to its proximity to the eastern Costa del Sol [33]. The Málaga wine route was recently certified [11]. The certification of the route is a requirement in the case of wine routes in Spain [11]. They are periodically accredited by complying with the rules of the manual of the Wine Routes of Spain tourism product, obtaining the right to use the Spanish Wine Routes brand [112]. In other countries, it is not necessary to guarantee the quality of a route since its existence depends on public–private initiatives.

4. Results

Viticulture in La Axarquía enjoys a special qualification as it can be defined as heroic, a term referring to the difficulty imposed by the physical environment on the tasks of maintaining the vineyard and harvesting that must be done completely by hand [113]. This represents a way of life that is integrated into the landscape and cultural heritage, forming a unique territory of great cultural and tourist value. This fact is reflected in the opinions gathered in the winemakers’ interviews.

4.1. Elements According to the State of the Art

The literature review resulted in the identification of 19 elements (Figure 2) that are involved in the conformation of an enotourist route/itinerary.
There are nine elements that are most frequently mentioned by the state of the art (Figure 3). The winery is the essential element for the design of a wine route or itinerary. After that, experts mentioned festivities, gastronomy, and food. These are followed by the landscape and, especially, the wine landscape, which together are a unique motivation to travel to destinations that have this resource. Restaurants also mark a point of reference in the enotourist visits, together with leisure activities and the purchase of local products. Services related to accommodation are considered as another significant element of wine tourism, which is completed by elements of traditional architecture.

4.2. Elements Selected by Winemakers

Figure 4 shows in order of importance the elements highlighted by the winemakers.
The analysis revealed the existence of several common points and interests among winemakers (Figure 5). The wineries they manage were the central axis of the enotourist offer, to which two elements were added, the natural and wine landscapes. Gastronomy was another element to be taken into account, followed by a second group made up of the climatic conditions that allow the development of the activity almost all year round, the offer of accommodation in the visited area, the popular festivals, especially those in which wine is the protagonist, and the traditional architecture.

4.3. Elements Selected by Stakeholders

Agents provided answers very similar to winemakers (Figure 5).
Wineries took the lead, followed by heritage elements such as traditional architecture, the natural and wine landscapes, and gastronomy (Figure 6). For this group of prescribers (Figure 7), the products and the local craftsmanship should be part of the offer available for wine tourists. The weather conditions were again highlighted as one of the most important factors, as well as the varied offers of accommodation available in the region.

4.4. Elements Selected by Wine Tourists

As can be observe in Figure 8, tourists also agreed that the winery was the most important element in the creation of an enotourist route.
This group highlighted eight elements (Figure 9). Almost all of them included the natural and wine landscapes and traditional architecture. In the second group of elements, as far as the level of mentions was concerned, we found the traditional festivities and the restaurants. Leisure and the weather conditions were also at this level.

4.5. Key Elements Involved in the Wine Routes. Study Case

The results of the research allowed the design of a model, as seen in Figure 10, which synthesises the elements taken into account in the creation of an enotourist route in La Axarquía. This proposal is based on a combination of the elements found in the academic literature (Model A) and in those mentioned by winemakers (Model B), stakeholders (Model C), and tourists (Model D).
The proposal is a synthesis that meets the expectations of the different target groups. The wineries are the central axis on which elements such as traditional and wine festivals, natural and wine landscapes, local gastronomy, and traditional architecture pivot.

5. Discussion

Wine tourism is a complex activity that goes beyond the traditional tourist approach. However, the development of an enotourist proposal that includes a wine route or itinerary requires a transversal work that involves various public and private agents, and that has as its axis the territory itself, its heritage elements, and the local population [68]. Wine tourism can contribute to tourism development by improving the sustainability of the territory, promoting the preservation of cultural traditions and agricultural heritage, especially those related to wine.
The tension generated by the attempt to attract tourists, the evident economic benefit, and the real possibilities that the territory has to offer are important factors to take into account in the creation of an itinerary or route. There is no wine route without wineries, but neither can it exist without the attractions offered by the different heritage elements and the specific services offered to visitors.
By observing the background mentioned in the literature on enotourism, the question of sustainable development was perceived from the initial stages of the design as a paradigm for the development of the enotourist offer [52]. Any sustainable economic activity that aims to endure and have a positive influence must generate a different value chain. A wine route allows us to bet on the development of local and quality products and, as far as possible, organic ones. A perfect complement to generate an adequate and sustainable enotourist offer, based on wines of high quality and differentiated character.
Taking into account the small size of the territory of La Axarquía, the opinions of 100% of the existing wineries and of a very high number of stakeholders in this study were available. Only in the case of tourists was the number used to corroborate the opinions of the other interviewees, which constitutes a limitation. Even so, we preferred to consider them since they provided a complementary but reduced vision to this study from the point of view of supply.

6. Conclusions

The review of the literature shows that scholars’ attention to the key elements of the wine routes is crucial to study their development and success. Thus, it has been possible to observe the elements that the academics consider relevant in the wine routes, allowing us to trace a wide group of elements that should be present in an enotourist route. The field research made it possible to delimit these elements in the case study. This has a series of direct consequences for the planning of the routes. This research can help to define an enotourist proposal that will satisfy the visitors to these routes.
The design of the wine routes should at least include the elements resulting from the investigation. In the case of Spanish routes, ACEVIN, the entity in charge of certifying Spanish routes following the criteria established by its European counterpart, established a series of requirements that do not specifically refer to the territory and its resources. The research established that traditional architecture, gastronomy, traditional and wine festivals, as well as the wine and natural landscapes are indispensable elements for success. In the case of routes that do not follow this certification model, the common elements obtained in this research should be incorporated as parameters of obligatory analysis for the success of their offers. In particular, although the private and public operators are the ones who promote the creation of the enotourist route, the interests of the enotourists and their desire to have a hedonic experience around the wine, the territory, and the cellars should not be left aside.
La Axarquía is an area where the culture of wine is both a factor of economic development and a formula for preserving traditions in a unique landscape. It is a territory that has a special tourist attraction, thanks to the traditional ways of harvesting. In addition, the field study revealed an interest in tangible and intangible heritage resources. The limited network of small wineries is a fragile reminder of the need to implement actions that guarantee their survival and the expansion of the activity.
Enotourists know what they are looking for and are aware of the heritage values and the need for resources to be sustainable. Quality and differentiation, without forgetting the authenticity provided by the territory and the people who live in it, are the keys to the success of wine tourism. This is a challenge that winemakers must face with the institutional support, ensuring the survival of a thousand-year-old tradition. There are still unresolved questions: What is the role of the local population in the success of the wine tourism routes? How should wineries and service companies adapt to the growing pressure to become sustainable businesses? In addition to this, there is a change in the paradigm that is leading to a new model of enotourist experience based on the expansion of digital resources, at the levels of both communication and marketing.
The results obtained in the research demonstrate the interest of researchers in all aspects related to wine routes, opening an interesting field of study on the impact that heritage elements have on the success of the routes in conjunction with the interests of all parties involved in its design and subsequent enjoyment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R.-R.d.l.C. and G.Z.-A.; methodology, E.C.-R. and G.Z.-A.; software, G.Z.-A.; validation, E.R.-R.d.l.C., E.C.-R. and G.Z.-A.; formal analysis, E.C.-R. and E.R.-R.d.l.C.; investigation, G.Z.-A. and E.C.-R.; resources, E.C.-R.; data curation, E.R.-R.d.l.C. and G.Z.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R.-R.d.l.C. and G.Z.-A.; writing—review and editing, E.C.-R. and E.R.-R.d.l.C.; visualization, G.Z.-A. and E.R.-R.d.l.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all respondents for their kind cooperation for our questionnaires and the members of SEJ-121 and the University of Malaga (UMA) for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interests.

Appendix A

Open Questionnaire Model. Axarquía Wine Route
Winemakers and Stakeholders
Name:
Position:
Institution/Company:
Date:
Ref#:
  • Do you consider it interesting that La Axarquía has its own itinerary on the Málaga Wine Route?
  • Are the resources and services of La Axarquía enough to attract wine tourists?
  • What needs do you detect in La Axarquía to attract the wine tourist?
  • Do you think that the current offer of La Axarquía is interesting to the tourists?
  • What problems would you identify in La Axarquía regarding wine tourism activity?
  • How would you rate the tourist accommodation offer in La Axarquía?
  • How would you rate the accommodation offer in La Axarquía?
  • What should be the involvement of private agents and institutions of La Axarquía in the creation of a wine route?
  • What should be the implication of wineries in the wine route?
  • Do you think you can design a sustainable wine tourism offer in La Axarquía?
Tourists
Sex:
Age:
Country of origin:
City (Village) where you stay:
Length of stay (in days):
Type of accommodation:
Ref#:
  • Do you consider it interesting that La Axarquía has its own itinerary on the Málaga Wine Route?
  • What tourist resources do you consider to be the most important for creating a wine tourism route in La Axarquía?
  • Do you think that the supply of wineries is sufficient in La Axarquía?
  • What kinds of tourist services should be present in a wine route in La Axarquía?
  • Is the accommodation offer in La Axarquía sufficient?
  • What kinds of accommodation should be present on La Axarquía wine route?
  • What kinds of services should be included in La Axarquía wine route?
  • What distinctive values/elements does La Axarquía wine route have?
  • What aspects of your visit produced the most satisfaction?
  • Do you think that a sustainable wine tourism route can be built in La Axarquía?

References

  1. Bessière, J. Manger ailleurs, manger “local”: La fonction touristique de la gastronomie de terroir. Espaces 2006, 242, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bessière, J.; Poulain, J.P.; y Tibère, L. Lálimentation au coeur du voyage. Le rôle du tourisme dans la valorisation des patrimoines alimentaires locaux. Tour. Rech. 2013, 3, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  3. Scheffer, S.; Pirou, J.L. La “gastronomie” dans la promotion d’une destination touristique: De l’image aux lieux de pratiques (analyse comparée de la Normandie et de la Bretagne). In Proceedings of the XLVIe Colloque ASRDLF, Entre Projets Locaux de Développement et Globalisation de L’économie: Quels Déséquilibres Pour les Espaces Régionaux, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 6–8 July 2009; Volume 6, p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guzmán, T.J.L.-G.; Cañizares, S.M.S. La creación de productos turísticos utilizando rutas enológicas. Pasos. Rev Tur. Patrim. Cult. 2008, 6, 159–171. [Google Scholar]
  5. Medina, F.X.; Tresserras Juan, J. Turismo enológico y rutas del vino en Cataluña: Análisis de casos: D.O. Penedès, D.O. Priorat y D.O. Montsant. Pasos. Rev Tur. Patrim. Cult. 2008, 6, 493–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Díaz Armas, R.J. Potencialidad e integración del “turismo del vino” en un destino de sol y playa: El caso de Tenerife. Pasos. Rev Tur. Patrim. Cult. 2008, 6, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bruwer, J.; Alant, K. The hedonic nature of wine tourism consumption: An experiential view. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2009, 21, 235–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Orden-Reyes, C.; Vargas-Sanchez, A. La satisfacción del turista enológico: Aplicación al condado de Huelva. In Proceedings of the Turismo y Sostenibilidad: V Jornadas de Investigación en Turismo, Sevilla, Spain, 17–18 May 2012; pp. 781–803. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tabasco, J.J.P.; Del Carmen Cañizares Ruiz, M.; Pulpón, Á.R.R. Patrimonio, viñedo y turismo: Recursos específicos para la innovación y el desarrollo territorial de Castilla-La Mancha. Cuad. Tur. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruiz Romero de la Cruz, E.; De los Reyes Cruz Ruiz, E.; Zamarreño Aramendia, G. Rutas enológicas y desarrollo local. Presente y futuro en la provincia de Málaga. Int. J. Sci. Manag. Tour. 2017, 3, 283–310. [Google Scholar]
  11. ACEVIN. Asociación Española de Ciudades del Vino. 2020. Available online: https://www.acevin.es/ (accessed on 3 February 2020).
  12. Hosteltour. Web Hosteltour. 2019. Available online: https://www.hosteltur.com/ (accessed on 21 December 2019).
  13. Gilbert, D.C. Touristic Development of a Viticultural Region of Spain. Int. J. Wine Mark. 1992, 4, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mitchell, R.; Hall, C.M. Wine Tourism Research: The State of Play. Tour. Rev. Int. 2006, 9, 307–332. Available online: http://0-www-ingentaconnect-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/content/10.3727/154427206776330535 (accessed on 19 August 2020). [CrossRef]
  15. Marzo-Navarro, M.; Pedraja-Iglesias, M. Desarrollo del turismo del vino desde la perspectiva de los productores. Una primera aproximación al caso de Aragón—España. Estud. Perspect. Tur. 2012, 21, 585–603. [Google Scholar]
  16. Alonso, A.D.; Liu, Y. Visitor Centers, Collaboration, and the Role of Local Food and Beverage as Regional Tourism Development Tools: The Case of the Blackwood River Valley in Western Australia. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. López-Guzmán, T.; Garcia, J.R.; Rodriguez, Á.V. Revisión de la literatura cientifica sobre enoturismo en España. Cuad. Tur. 2013, 32, 171–188. [Google Scholar]
  18. López Guzmán, T.; Rodríguez García, J.; Vieira Rodríguez, A. Análisis diferenciado del perfil y de la motivación del turista nacional y extranjero en la ruta del vino del Marco de Jerez. Gran Tour 2012, 6, 83–100. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rodríguez-García, J.; López-Guzmán, T.; Sánchez-Cañizares, S.M. Análisis del desarrollo del enoturismo en España–Un estudio de caso. Cult. Rev. Cult. Tur. 2010, 4, 51–68. [Google Scholar]
  20. López-Guzmán, T.; Cañizares, S.M.S.; García, R. Wine routes in Spain: A case study. Tourism 2009, 57, 421–434. [Google Scholar]
  21. López-Guzmán, T.; Millán Vázquez de la Torre, G.; Caridad y Ocerín, J.M. Análisis econométrico del enoturismo en España: Un estudio de caso. Estud. Perspect. Tur. 2008, 17, 98–118. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pérez Gálvez, J.C. Motivation and tourist satisfaction in wine festivals: XXXI ed. wine tasting Montilla-Moriles, Spain. Tour. Manag. Stud. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Alvear González, A.; Aparicio Castillo, S.; Landaluce Calvo, M.I. Una primera exploración de mercado enoturístico real de la ribera del duero. In Conocimiento, Innovación y Emprendedores: Camino al Futuro; Universidad de la Rioja: Logroño, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gómez Rico, M. El Turismo Enológico Desde la Perspectiva de la Oferta; Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces: Madrid, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. Clemente-Ricolfe, J.S.; Escribá-Pérez, C.; Rodriguez-Barrio, J.E.; Buitrago-Vera, J.M. The potential wine tourist market: The case of Valencia (Spain). J. Wine Res. 2012, 23, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Álvarez García, J.; Del Rio, M.D.L.C.; Coca Pérez, J.L.; González Sanmartín, J.M. Turismo enológico y ruta del vino del riberiro en Galicia-España. Estud. Perspect. Tur. 2014, 23, 706–729. [Google Scholar]
  27. Galacho Jiménez, F.; Luque Gil, A. La dinámica del paisaje de la costa del sol desde la aparición del turismo. Baética Estud. Arte Geogr. Hist. 2000, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rosenberger, R.S.; Walsh, R.G. Nonmarket value of western valley ranchland using contingent valuation. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 1997, 22, 296–309. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ruiz Urrestarazu, E. Patrimonio Rural y Políticas Europeas. Lurralde Investig. Espac. 2001, 24, 305–314. [Google Scholar]
  30. Silva Pérez, R. Agricultura, paisaje y patrimonio territorial. Los paisajes de la agricultura vistos como patrimonio. Bol. Asoc. Geogr. Españoles 2009, 49, 309–334. [Google Scholar]
  31. Carlsen, J.; Boksberger, P. Enhancing Consumer Value in Wine Tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2015, 39, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. CRDO Málaga. D.O. Málaga, Sierras de Málaga y Pasas de Málaga. Available online: www.vinomalaga.com (accessed on 19 August 2020).
  33. Alemeida García, F. La Costa del Sol Oriental como un Estudio de un Conflicto Territorial: La Planificación Ambiental Frente a la Urbanización; Servicio de Publicaciones e Intercambio Científico de la Universidad de Málaga: Málaga, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  34. Elias Pastor, L.V. El Turismo del Vino. Otra Experiencia de Ocio; Universidad de Deusto: Bilbao, Spain, 2006; p. 256. Available online: http://www.deusto-publicaciones.es/deusto/pdfs/ocio/ocio30.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2020).
  35. Privitera, D. Heritage and wine as tourist attractions in rural areas. In Proceedings of the 116th EAAE Seminar, Parma, Italy, 27–30 October 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khartishvili, L.; Muhar, A.; Dax, T.; Khelashvili, I. Rural tourism in Georgia in transition: Challenges for regional sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cavicchi, A. Preserving the authenticity of food and wine festivals: The case of Italy. Cap. Cult. Stud. Value Cult. Herit. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wolikow, S. Le vin de Champagne: De la visite à l’Oenotourisme, un chemin difficile. Cult. Rev. Cult. Tur. 2014, 8, 172–187. [Google Scholar]
  39. Koch, J.; Martin, A.; Nash, R. Overview of perceptions of German wine tourism from the winery perspective. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2013, 25, 50–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Festa, G.; Shams, S.M.R.; Metallo, G.; Cuomo, M.T. Opportunities and challenges in the contribution of wine routes to wine tourism in Italy—A stakeholders’ perspective of development. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lourenço-Gomes, L.; Pinto, L.M.C.; Rebelo, J. Wine and cultural heritage. the experience of the Alto Douro Wine Region. Wine Econ. Policy 2015, 4, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dougherty, P.H. The Geography of Wine: Regions, Terroir and Techniques; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012; ISBN 9789400704640. [Google Scholar]
  43. Trišić, I.; Štetić, S.; Privitera, D.; Nedelcu, A. Wine routes in Vojvodina Province, Northern Serbia: A tool for sustainable tourism development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Coros, M.M.; Pop, A.M.; Popa, A.I. Vineyards and wineries in Alba County, Romania towards sustainable business development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jones, F.M.; Singh, N. Determining the critical succes Factors of the wine Tourism Region of Napa from a supply perspective. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2015, 13, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Getz, D.; Brown, G. Benchmarking wine tourism development: The case of the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia, Canada. Int. J. Wine Mark. 2006, 18, 78–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sigala, M. Wine tourism around the world: Development, management and markets. J. Wine Res. 2014, 25, 133–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hojman, D.E.; Hunter-Jones, P. Wine tourism: Chilean wine regions and routes. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schlüter, R.G.; Norrild, J. Enotourism in Argentina: The power of wine to promote a region. In Tourism in Latin America: Cases of Success; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wilson, S.; Fesenmaier, D.R.; Fesenmaier, J.; Van Es, J.C. Factors for success in rural tourism development. J. Travel Res. 2001, 40, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gilinsky, A.; Newton, S.K.; Atki, T.S.; Santini, C.; Cavicchi, A.; Casas, A.R.; Huertas, R. Perceived efficacy of sustainability strategies in the US, Italian, and Spanish wine industries a comparative study. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2015, 27, 164–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Montella, M.M. Wine tourism and sustainability: A review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Elías Pastor, L.V. Paisaje del viñedo: Patrimonio y recurso. PASOS Rev. Tur. Patrim. Cult. 2008, 6, 137–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Harvey, M.; White, L.; Frost, W. Wine and Identity: Branding, Heritage, Terroir; Taylor & Francis Group: Oxfordshire, UK, 2014; ISBN 9780203067604. [Google Scholar]
  55. Carmichael, B.A. Understanding the wine tourism experience for winery visitors in the Niagara region, Ontario, Canada. Tour. Geogr. 2005, 7, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pérez, R.S.; Fernández Salinas, V. El patrimonio y el territorio como activos para el desarrollo desde la perspectiva del ocio y el turismo. Investig. Geogr. 2008, 46, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Mitchell, R.; Charters, S.; Albrecht, J.N. Cultural systems and the wine tourism product. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brunori, G.; Rossi, A. Synergy and coherence through collective action: Some insights from wine routes in Tuscany. Sociol. Rural. 2000, 40, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Macionis, N. Wine and Food Tourism in the Australian Capital Territory: Exploring the Links. Int. J. Wine Mark. 1998, 10, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Telfer, D.J. Tastes of niagara: Building strategic alliances between tourism and agriculture. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2000, 1, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Alonso, A.D.; Liu, Y.; Duarte, A.; Liu, Y. International Journal of Hospitality Management The potential for marrying local gastronomy and wine: The case of the ‘fortunate islands’. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30, 974–981. Available online: https://0-www-sciencedirect-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0278431911000326 (accessed on 20 January 2019). [CrossRef]
  62. Getz, D. Wine and Food Events: Experiences and Impacts. In Wine Tourism Destination Management and Marketing; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  63. Brochado, A.; Stoleriu, O.; Lupu, C. Wine tourism: A multisensory experience. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rocchi, B.; Gabbai, M. Territorial identity as a competitive advantage in wine marketing: A case study. J. Wine Res. 2013, 24, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cristófol, F.J.; Aramendia, G.Z.; de-San-Eugenio-Vela, J. Effects of Social Media on Enotourism. Two Cases Study: Okanagan Valley (Canada) and Somontano (Spain). Sustainability 2020, 12, 6705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Michael Hall, C. Wine, Food, and Tourism Marketing; Taylor & Francis Group: Oxfordshire, UK, 2013; ISBN 9781315043395. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hashimoto, A.; Telfer, D.J. Positioning an emerging wine route in the Niagara region: Understanding the wine tourism market and its implications for marketing. In Wine, Food, and Tourism Marketing; Taylor & Francis Group: Oxfordshire, UK, 2013; ISBN 9781315043395. [Google Scholar]
  68. De Uña-Álvarez, E.; Villarino-Pérez, M. Linking wine culture, identity, tourism and rural development in a denomination of origin territory (NW of Spain). Cuad. Tur. 2019, 93–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lavandoski, J.; Pinto, P.; Silva, J.A.; Vargas-Sánchez, A. Causes and effects of wine tourism development in wineries: The perspective of institutional theory. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2016, 28, 266–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dawson, H.; Holmes, M.; Jacobs, H.; Wade, R.I. Wine tourism: Winery visitation in the wine appellations of Ontario. J. Vacat. Mark. 2011, 17, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Di Fazio, S.; Modica, G. Historic rural landscapes: Sustainable planning strategies and action criteria. The Italian experience in the Global and European Context. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Buonincontri, P.; Marasco, A.; Ramkissoon, H. Visitors’ experience, place attachment and sustainable behaviour at cultural heritage sites: A conceptual framework. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Hampton, M. Heritage, local communities and economic development. Ann. Tour. Res. 2005, 32, 735–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Faugère, C.; Bouzdine-Chameeva, T.; Pesme, J.J.-O.; Durrieu, F. The Impact of Tourism Strategies and Regional Factors on Wine Tourism Performance: Bordeaux vs. Mendoza, Mainz, Florence, Porto and Cape Town. SSRN Electron. J. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Getz, D.; Brown, G. Critical success factors for wine tourism regions: A demand analysis. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gill, D.; Byslma, B.; Ouschan, R. Customer perceived value in a cellar door visit: The impact on behavioural intentions. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2007, 19, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Meraz Ruiz, L.; Ruiz Vega, A.V. El enoturismo de Baja California, México: Un análisis de su oferta y comparación con la región vitivinícola de La Rioja, España. Rev. Investig. Turísticas 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Alonso, A.D.; Liu, Y. Coping with changes in a sector in crisis: The case of small Spanish wineries. J. Wine Res. 2012, 23, 81–95. Available online: http://0-www-tandfonline-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/09571264.2011.646252 (accessed on 20 January 2019). [CrossRef]
  79. Popp, L.; McCole, D. Understanding tourists’ itineraries in emerging rural tourism regions: The application of paper-based itinerary mapping methodology to a wine tourism region in Michigan. Curr. Issues Tour. 2016, 19, 988–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Getz, D.; Carlsen, J.; Brown, G.; Havitz, M. Wine tourism and consumers. In Tourism Management: Analysis, Behaviour and Strategy; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2007; ISBN 9781845933234. [Google Scholar]
  81. Alant, K.; Bruwer, J. Wine tourism behaviour in the context of a motivational framework for wine regions and cellar doors. J. Wine Res. 2004, 15, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bruwer, J. South African wine routes: Some perspectives on the wine tourism industry’s structural dimensions and wine tourism product. Tour. Manag. 2003, 24, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Famularo, B.; Bruwer, J.; Li, E. Region of origin as choice factor: Wine knowledge and wine tourism involvement influence. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2010, 22, 362–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hall, C.M.; Mitchell, R. Wine tourism in the Mediterranean: A tool for restructuring and development. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2000, 42, 445–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Brown, G.P.; Havitz, M.E.; Getz, D. Relationship between wine involvement and wine-related travel. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2006, 21, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Park, J.Y.; Bufquin, D.; Back, R.M. When do they become satiated? An examination of the relationships among winery tourists’ satisfaction, repat visit and revisit intentions. J. Dest Mark&Manag. 2019, 11, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ferreira, S.L.A.; Hunter, C.A. Wine tourism development in South Africa: A geographical analysis. Tour. Geogr. 2017, 19, 676–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Castillo Ruiz, J.; Anguita Cantero, R.; Cañete Pérez, J.A.; Cejudo García, E.; Cuéllar Padilla, M.D.; Gallar Hernández, D.; Martínez Hidalgo, C.; Martínez Yáñez, C.; Matarán-Ruiz, A.; Ortega Ruiz, A.; et al. Carta de Baeza sobre Patrimonio Agrario.; Universidad Internacional de Andalucía: Sevilla, Spain, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  89. Cañizares Ruiz, M.C.; Ruiz Pulpón, A.R. Evolución del paisaje del viñedo en Castilla-La Mancha: Y revalorización del patrimonio afrario en el contexto de la modernización. Scripta Nova. 2014, 18. Available online: http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/sn/sn-498.htm (accessed on 8 July 2020).
  90. Jeambey, Z. Rutas Gastronómicas y Desarrollo local: Un ensayo de conceptualización en Cataluña. PASOS Rev. Tur. Patrim. Cult. 2017, 14, 1187–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Thomas, B.; Quintal, V.A.; Phau, I. Predictors of attitude and intention to revisit a winescape. In Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 29 November 2009. [Google Scholar]
  92. Molleví Bortoló, G.; Fusté Forné, F. El turismo gastronómico, rutas turísticas y productos locales: El caso del vino y el queso en Cataluña. Geographicalia 2017, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Hu, Y.; Ritchie, J.R.B. Measuring Destination Attractiveness: A Contextual Approach. J. Travel Res. 1993, 32, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Charters, S.; Menival, D. Wine tourism in champagne. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2011, 35, 102–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wargenau, A.; Che, D. Wine tourism development and marketing strategies in Southwest Michigan. Int. J. Wine Mark. 2006, 18, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hall, C.M.; Sharples, L.; Mitchell, R.; Macionis, N.; Cambourne, B. Food Tourism around the World; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  97. Carlsen, J. A review of global wine tourism research. J. Wine Res. 2004, 15, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cohen, E.; Ben-Nun, L. The Important Dimensions of Wine Tourism Experience from Potential Visitors’ Perception. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2009, 9, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Iglesias, M.P.; Navarro, M.M. Wine tourism development from the perspective of family winery [DEsarrollo del enoturismo desde la perspectiva de las bodegas familiares]. Cuad. Tur. 2014, 34, 233–249. [Google Scholar]
  100. Carlsen, J.; Dowling, R. Wine Tourism Marketing Issues in Australia. Int. J. Wine Mark. 1998, 10, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wimmer, R.D.; Dominick, J.R. La Investigación Científica de los Medios de Comunicación. Una Introducción a Sus Métodos; Bosch: Barcelona, Spain, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  102. Creswell, J.W. Qualitative Enquiry & Research Design, Choosing among Five Approaches; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  103. Mason, J. Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qual. Res. 2006, 6, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pepper, C.; Wildy, H. Using narratives as a research strategy. Qual. Res. J. 2009, 9, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gillis, A.; Jackson, W. Research Methods for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation; Davis Company: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  106. Dillon, W.; Madden, T.J.; Firtle, N.H. Marketing Research in a Marketing Environment; Richard, D., Ed.; Irwin. INC: Burr Ridge, IL, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  107. AlYahmady, H.H.; Al Abri, S.S. Using Nvivo for Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Int. Interdiscip. J. Educ. 2013, 2, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Ponce de León Elizondo, A.; Valdemoros San Emeterio, M.A.; Sanz, E. Fundamentos en el manejo del NVIVO 9 como herramienta al servicio de estudios cualitativos. Context. Educ. Rev. Educ. 2011, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lucena, D. Axarquía. Geografía Humana y Económica; CEDER Axarquía: Málaga, Spain, 2007; p. 88. ISBN 9788468951508. Available online: http://apta.axarquiacostadelsol.org/geografia-humana-y-economica-de-la-axarquia-pdf/ (accessed on 27 March 2020).
  110. IECA Estadísticas de Población. Available online: http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/temas/est/tema_poblacion.htm (accessed on 7 July 2020).
  111. Díaz Roldán, M.C. La Axarquía: Escenario de la crisis de la viticultura tradicional. Isla Arriarán Rev. Cult. Científica 1996, 8, 155–164. [Google Scholar]
  112. Ruiz Romero de la Cruz, E.; Zamarreño-Aramendia, G.; Cruz Ruiz, E. ¿ El Origen lo es Todo?: Ayer y Hoy de Las Denominaciones y Marcas Colectivas de Garantía en el Sector Vinícola en España; Ruíz Romero de la Cruz, E., Cruz Ruíz, E., Zamarreño Aramendia, G., Eds.; Universidad de Málaga: Málaga, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  113. CERVIM. 2020. Available online: http://www.cervim.org/es/cervim-presentaci-n.aspx (accessed on 6 May 2020).
Figure 1. Map of the region of Axarquía (Málaga, Spain). ETRS89 UTM 30S. Source: Authors.
Figure 1. Map of the region of Axarquía (Málaga, Spain). ETRS89 UTM 30S. Source: Authors.
Sustainability 12 09242 g001
Figure 2. Elements mentioned in the literature review ordered in a Pareto chart. Authors.
Figure 2. Elements mentioned in the literature review ordered in a Pareto chart. Authors.
Sustainability 12 09242 g002
Figure 3. Elements involved in the creation of a wine route, according to the state of the art. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Figure 3. Elements involved in the creation of a wine route, according to the state of the art. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Sustainability 12 09242 g003
Figure 4. Elements mentioned by winemakers ordered in a Pareto chart. Authors.
Figure 4. Elements mentioned by winemakers ordered in a Pareto chart. Authors.
Sustainability 12 09242 g004
Figure 5. Elements selected by winemakers. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Figure 5. Elements selected by winemakers. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Sustainability 12 09242 g005
Figure 6. Classification of elements mentioned by the ordered stakeholders in a Pareto chart. Authors.
Figure 6. Classification of elements mentioned by the ordered stakeholders in a Pareto chart. Authors.
Sustainability 12 09242 g006
Figure 7. Elements selected by stakeholders. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Figure 7. Elements selected by stakeholders. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Sustainability 12 09242 g007
Figure 8. Classification of elements mentioned by the ordered enotourists in a Pareto chart. Authors.
Figure 8. Classification of elements mentioned by the ordered enotourists in a Pareto chart. Authors.
Sustainability 12 09242 g008
Figure 9. Elements selected by wine tourists. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Figure 9. Elements selected by wine tourists. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Sustainability 12 09242 g009
Figure 10. Final proposal of elements for the creation of a wine route. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Figure 10. Final proposal of elements for the creation of a wine route. Source: Authors using NVivo software.
Sustainability 12 09242 g010
Table 1. Elements involved in the creation of an enotourist route, according to the state of the art (2006–2019).
Table 1. Elements involved in the creation of an enotourist route, according to the state of the art (2006–2019).
Tangible Heritage Intangible HeritageNatural Heritage Services Others
Authors ElementsHistorical/Traditional Architecture MuseumsArchaeological HeritageWineries CellarsGastronomyWine/Traditional FestivitiesCrafts/Local ProductsEnvironmentLandscape/Wine Landscape Climate/WeatherLeisureWine ShopsRestaurantsTourist Service CompaniesTourist OfficesAccommodationSignageGood Road Network
Alant and Bruwer (2009)x xxxx xxxxx x
Alonso and Liu (2011) xx x xxx
Baraja, Herrero, Martínez Arnáiz, Plaza (2019)xx x xx x xx x
Baird, Hall and Castka (2019) xxxx xx x
Bruwer (2003) x xxxx x xxx xx
Carlsen (2004) xxx x x x
Charters and Menival (2011) x x x x x
Carmichael (2005)x xxxx x xx x x
Cohen and Ben-Nun (2009) xxxxxxx xxx x x
De Uña-Álvarez and Villarino-Pérez (2019)x xxxxxx x x x
Faugère, et al. (2013)xx xxxx xxx xxxx x
Ferrerira and Hunter (2017)xx xxx xxx xx x x
Festa, Riad Shams, Metallo and Cuomo (2020) x x xxx x x
Getz and Brown (2006)x xxxx xxxxxx xxx
Houghton (2008) x x xxx
Jeambey (2016)x xxxx x x xxx
Kirova and Vo Thanh (2018)xx x xx x xxx x
Koch, Martin and Nash (2013) x x x xx xx
Marzo and Pedraja (2012) x xxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Meraz and Ruiz Vega (2016)xxxxxx xxx x
Mitchell and Hall (2006) x x x x x x
Movellí and Fuste (2016)xxxxxxx x xxxxxx
Plaza, Cañizares, Ruiz Pulpón (2017)xxxxxxx xxxxxx x
Popp and McCole (2016)xx xxxx xxxx x
Privitera (2010)xx xxxx xx x x
Scorrano, Fait, Iaia and Rosato (2018)xx xxx xx
Thomas, Quintal and Phau (2010)x x xxxx
Ye, Hang and Yuan (2017) xxx x
Wargenau and Che (2006) xxx x xxxxx
Table 2. Fact Sheet.
Table 2. Fact Sheet.
Data Collection MethodOpen-Ended Structured Questionnaires
Sample:Winemakers
Institutions, Stakeholders linked to the Region of Axarquía
Wine tourists
80
April–November 2019
Sampling sizeWineries (10): Bodegas Hermanos López Martín, Bodega José Molina, Bodegas Almijara, Bodegas Luis Picante, Bodega A. Muñoz Cabrera, Bodegas Bentomiz, Sedella Vinos, Bodegas Medina y Toro, Bodegas Jorge Ordoñez & Co., Cooperativa Unión Pasera de La Axarquía (Ucopaxa)
Field Work DateStakeholders (10) (Member or representatives of these institutions): Association of Municipalities of the Axarquía, Center for Rural Development of the Axarquía (CEDER-Axarquía), Andalusian Regional Government Agriculture Delegation, Association for the Tourist Promotion of La Aaxarquía (APTA), Andalusian Tourism, Vélez Málaga Business Association, Nerja Business Association, Association of Young Farmers (ASAJA-Axaquia), Small Farmers Union (UPA-Axarquía) and Nerja Cave Foundation
60 wine tourists
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cruz-Ruiz, E.; Zamarreño-Aramendia, G.; Ruiz-Romero de la Cruz, E. Key Elements for the Design of a Wine Route. The Case of La Axarquía in Málaga (Spain). Sustainability 2020, 12, 9242. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12219242

AMA Style

Cruz-Ruiz E, Zamarreño-Aramendia G, Ruiz-Romero de la Cruz E. Key Elements for the Design of a Wine Route. The Case of La Axarquía in Málaga (Spain). Sustainability. 2020; 12(21):9242. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12219242

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cruz-Ruiz, Elena, Gorka Zamarreño-Aramendia, and Elena Ruiz-Romero de la Cruz. 2020. "Key Elements for the Design of a Wine Route. The Case of La Axarquía in Málaga (Spain)" Sustainability 12, no. 21: 9242. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su12219242

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop