Next Article in Journal
Multi-Temporal Built-Up Grids of Brazilian Cities: How Trends and Dynamic Modelling Could Help on Resilience Challenges?
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable, Smart, and Sensing Technologies for Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
How Can Companies Decrease Salesperson Turnover Intention? The Corporate Social Responsibility Intervention
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/su13020751
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sustainable Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Big Data-Driven Smart Urban Economy: A Systematic Literature Review

by
Mihai Andronie
1,
George Lăzăroiu
1,*,
Mariana Iatagan
1,
Iulian Hurloiu
1 and
Irina Dijmărescu
2
1
Department of Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, 030045 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Pediatrics, Grigore Alexandrescu Children’s Emergency Hospital, 011743 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 751; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13020751
Submission received: 20 December 2020 / Revised: 8 January 2021 / Accepted: 11 January 2021 / Published: 14 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resilient Cyber-Physical Systems)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this article, we cumulate previous research findings indicating that cyber-physical production systems bring about operations shaping social sustainability performance technologically. We contribute to the literature on sustainable cyber-physical production systems by showing that the technological and operations management features of cyber-physical systems constitute the components of data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing. Throughout September 2020, we performed a quantitative literature review of the Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases, with search terms including “sustainable industrial value creation”, “cyber-physical production systems”, “sustainable smart manufacturing”, “smart economy”, “industrial big data analytics”, “sustainable Internet of Things”, and “sustainable Industry 4.0”. As we inspected research published only in 2019 and 2020, only 323 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria. By eliminating controversial findings, outcomes unsubstantiated by replication, too imprecise material, or having similar titles, we decided upon 119, generally empirical, sources. Future research should investigate whether Industry 4.0-based manufacturing technologies can ensure the sustainability of big data-driven production systems by use of Internet of Things sensing networks and deep learning-assisted smart process planning.

1. Introduction

The objective of our systematic review is to analyze the lately published literature on sustainable cyber-physical production systems and synthesize the interconnected insights on big data-driven smart urban economy. By inspecting the most relevant (the Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest) and recent (2019–2020) sources, we have endeavored to prove that, in Industry 4.0, big data-driven technologies assist in the adoption of a cleaner production approach and in the advancement of sustainable smart manufacturing. The actuality and novelty of the current research are configured by paying attention to a hot emerging topic, that is, sustainable cyber-physical production systems. The research problem developed at full length of the systematic review is whether sustainable smart manufacturing platforms can be networked to assimilate the value chain throughout businesses and constitute a groundbreaking industrial form assisted by cognitive decision-making algorithms.
In this research, we cumulate previously published findings clarifying that, by use of Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems, industrial big data and knowledge distributed throughout diverse lifecycle management branches can be decisively enabled. Our main aim is to indicate that implementation of Internet of Things sensing networks, real-time big data analytics, cyber-physical production systems, and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms improve logistics processes. We contribute to the outstanding literature on sustainable cyber-physical production systems by showing that Industry 4.0 wireless networks stimulate businesses to set up a consonance between the economic feasibility of their decisions and low-carbon effects. We want to elucidate whether industrial big data analytics, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, sustainable product lifecycle management, and cognitive decision-making algorithms can assist throughout the decarbonization process by use of digital technologies.

2. Methodology

We conducted a systematic review of first-rate literature on sustainable cyber-physical production systems in big data-driven smart urban economy by adopting Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, with the following inclusion criteria: (i) being an original empirical research or review article; (ii) publications indexed in the Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases; (iii) particular search terms covered; (iv) written in English; and (v) publication date between 2019 and 2020. Publications were excluded from our analysis if they were (i) books, (ii) conference proceedings, and (iii) editorial materials. We employed the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR), a software program for the gathering, processing, and inspection of data for our research. The quality of the selected scholarly sources was assessed by employing the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Deriving and analyzing publicly accessible files (academic articles) as evidence, no institutional ethics approval was needed before starting the systematic review.
Throughout September 2020, we performed a quantitative literature review of the Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases, with search terms including “sustainable industrial value creation”, “cyber-physical production systems”, “sustainable smart manufacturing”, “smart economy”, “industrial big data analytics”, “sustainable Internet of Things”, and “sustainable Industry 4.0”. As we inspected research published only in 2019 and 2020, only 323 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria. By eliminating controversial findings, outcomes unsubstantiated by replication, too imprecise material, or having similar titles, we decided upon 119, generally empirical, sources (Table 1).

3. Sustainable Industrial Value Creation in Data-Driven Sustainable Smart Manufacturing

The articulation of a data-driven digitalized production, where social sustainability characteristics are handled proactively [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], can generate value throughout Internet of Things-based real-time manufacturing logistics. Functionalities can improve operations that are pivotal to data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing. Social sustainability undertakings cover large-scale consequences of production mechanisms and manufactured goods. Cyber-physical production systems bring about operations shaping social sustainability performance technologically. Social sustainability, cyber-physical production systems, and performance assessment articulate cutting-edge manufacturing processes. With the aim of configuring smart and sustainable spaces, cyber-physical systems articulate computing, networking, and process monitoring technologies that are transparently and autonomously integrated across sustainable Industry 4.0: embedded computers and networks supervise the physical processes by use of sensors and actuators, typically with feedback loops related to computations. Physical objects can be designed with connections to the virtual world, while integrating smart mechanisms to harness real-time cooperation. Interactions taking place throughout the physical world may alter the processing operations across the virtual world, resulting in a causal connection deployable for the incessant enhancement of artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms. Cognizant, autonomous, and self-configuring omnipresent systems can be instrumental in deep learning-assisted smart process planning.
The advancement of sustainable groundbreaking technologies [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] is decisive in the present framework of inconstant market demands. The technological and operations management features of cyber-physical systems constitute the components of data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing. Smart technologies may ensure that data-driven manufacturing systems are sustainable. Blockchain constitutes a breakthrough advancement of information technology for carrying out big data-driven innovation in sustainable Industry 4.0. The transparency features facilitated by blockchain may improve the sustainability of cyber-physical system-based smart factories and manufacturing networks. Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing articulates product lifecycle management effectively. Sustainable smart manufacturing represents a value-added recovery operation that can restore the value of the deteriorated product to its initial specific value. Remanufacturing represents a lifecycle renewal operation aiming to achieve green sustainable manufacturing. Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems, sustainable product lifecycle management, real-time process monitoring, Internet of Things sensing networks, and industrial big data, through cognitive decision-making algorithms, can be harnessed to carry out the indeterminate quality of deteriorated products by generating, supervising, and inspecting continuous real-time data throughout the elaborate remanufacturing process. Implementation of Internet of Things sensing networks, real-time big data analytics, cyber-physical production systems, and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms improve logistics processes, resulting in the sustainability of the retail industry. Deployment of Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems can assimilate supply chain operations, thus enhancing the sustainability of retail companies. By use of data sharing, visibility, and auto-capture, Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics enhances the supply chain performance dynamics as regards expenses, quality, delivery, and adjustability, consequently shaping the environmental, economic, and social sustainability of retail companies. Product sustainability is related to cyber-physical smart manufacturing systems. Product design capabilities constitute a pivotal source and an essential determinant for data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing competition. Product sustainable design takes into account environmental, economic, and social sustainability throughout the lifecycle of manufactured goods, thus generating products having significant low-carbon features.
Cyber-physical systems further sustainable smart manufacturing at full length of the lifecycle [21,22,23,24,25,26,27], enhancing the logistics, design, performance, and maintenance of digitized mass production systems. Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems can carry out the distribution and assimilation of data and production across various lifecycle stages, thus enabling sustainable product lifecycle management. Internet of Things smart devices can gather and inspect instantaneous data and together with real-time big data analytics and industrial artificial intelligence can configure end-user behavior and grasp the relevance for stakeholders, while articulating sustainable industrial value creation and displaying coherently the significant market segment and required features as regards reliability, precision, and extensiveness. Market analyses can shape the value chain to thoroughly identify the demands and determine latent criteria. Smart technological enhancements assist in optimizing prediction as regards maintenance, straightening out the service schedules, and the networking between product processes and low-carbon performance. The major outcomes can be assessed based on real-time big data analytics and industrial artificial intelligence in conjunction with standard appraisal procedures, and subsequent insights can lead to unbiased and rigorous decisions. By use of Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems, industrial big data and knowledge distributed throughout diverse lifecycle management branches can be decisively enabled, while more coherent and accurate decision-making concerning sustainable lifecycle management can be attained. Digital twin, pivotal in advancing sustainable smart manufacturing, designates a virtual image of a physical system in every part of its lifecycle. The implementation of digital twin technology is associated with Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems, covering product design, operational maintenance, and output planning processes, while catalyzing advancements across product lifecycle management.
As advancement to the manufacturing sector, Industry 4.0 wireless networks assist smart production systems [28,29,30,31,32,33] in attaining significant flexibility, swift design alterations, digital data technology, and adjustable technical workforce practice. The digital twin can sense the state of sustainable smart manufacturing systems instantaneously and forecast system failures. Digital twin-driven sustainable smart manufacturing comprises a basic platform, equipment, system, and service. Sustainable smart manufacturing platforms can be networked to assimilate the value chain throughout businesses and constitute a groundbreaking industrial form assisted by cognitive decision-making algorithms. The industrial big data of the basic platform is derived from its equipment layer comprising unit, production line, and manufacturing plant, in association with cloud computing and artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems. By thoroughly taking into account environmental, economic, and social aspects, and integrating personnel, machines, and cyber-physical production systems, industrial big data supply input for virtual and physical prototyping that shapes sustainable smart manufacturing equipment, systems, and services. Sustainable smart manufacturing equipment comprises a production unit and line; that is, machine tools, advanced robots, customized equipment, and assessment and monitoring technologies. The sustainable smart manufacturing system encompasses a discrete and a process component. Horizontally, the sustainable smart manufacturing system can be segmented into design, production, logistics, sales, and services, constituting a closed loop. Vertically, the sustainable smart manufacturing system can be segmented into automatic production and execution systems, and organizational resource management.
Data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing, Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics, and product decision-making information systems [28,34,35,36,37,38,39] facilitate the networking between the production equipment and manufactured goods. Sustainable smart manufacturing service consists of product advancement, operational manufacturing, and after-sales services. Product advancement services integrate shared design and product customization, manufacturing services assimilate sensor-based monitoring and collaborative manufacturing, while after-sales services subsume fault diagnosis and operational maintenance. Smart manufacturing equipment harmonizes sensing analysis, cognitive decision-making, and supervision functions developed on artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms. The smart manufacturing service chiefly covers the entire operation of product processing and manufacturing, while supplying monitoring, scheduling, and real-time warning. With the adoption of digital twin-based big data-driven sustainable smart production, manufacturing accuracy, product quality, and processing performance would incessantly optimize the operations. The digital twin and industrial big data technologies can configure virtual simulation models, being harnessed to digital real-time product analysis and machine fault diagnosis and reconditioning. The production equipment can autonomously sense the processing quality of the manufactured goods and make prompt changes. Smart manufacturing and digital twin deploy sensing and simulation, while controlling the status of manufactured goods and production equipment instantaneously and forecasting possible subsequent failures.

4. Big Data-Driven Smart Sustainable Energy and Electric Systems

The configuration of a significant business value in cyber-physical production systems [40,41,42,43,44,45,46] necessitates enhanced internal logistics systems as regards operational performance, operating time, and sustainability by use of Internet of Things-driven analytics. Key performance indicators may address operational assessments concerning expenses, time, quality, adjustability, and sustainability, and can be significant to manufacturing, inventory administration, quality assurance, and maintenance. Intralogistics is instrumental in productive capacity, operational performance, equipment effectiveness, sustainability, and energy consumption. The implementation of Internet of Things-driven analytics culminates in the upgrading of internal logistics systems as regards operational performance, operating time, and sustainability. While Internet of Things-enabled data value chains handle the collection, transfer, and coherent transformation of unprocessed information into applied knowledge, their integration within cyber-physical systems can provide their by-products in intralogistics practice. Cyber-physical production systems are pivotal in the advancement of cutting-edge big data-driven smart energy systems. Groundbreaking computational methodologies (e.g., environmentally friendly and energy efficient cyber-physical production system design) facilitate the sustainable development of deep learning-assisted smart process planning. Cyber-physical production systems can be harnessed to engage in the decrease of energy generated from extensive information center computing infrastructures and in the enhancement of computational coherence measurements across smart energy systems.
The circular economy is a factor in energy-intensive sectors [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55], participating in ethical sustainable societal development. In Industry 4.0, big data-driven technologies assist in the adoption of a cleaner production approach and in the advancement of data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing. Companies are under significant pressure towards ethical, efficient, and sustainable manufacturing operations in relation to Industry 4.0 and circular economy. For sustainable performance, products have to be manufactured through low-carbon, socially feasible, and economically robust digital operations. Cyber-physical production systems developed on ethical and sustainable manufacturing operations are coherent in reducing the use of energy and natural resources. Companies should integrate Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, and industrial big data analytics with various cyber-physical production systems to perform ethical and sustainable value addition activities that lead to resource optimization while altering market demands. Smart sustainable energy and electric systems are heterogeneous, highly elaborate, and nonlinear. The assimilation of discontinuous renewable energy sources together with particular household consumption behaviors generates unpredictability throughout smart sustainable energy and electric systems. The performance, supervision, and decision-making in an unstable environment necessitate growing automation and adjustability in operational monitoring, and an increase in efficiency to ensure the required level of service provided by smart sustainable energy and electric systems. Reinforcement learning constitutes a broad category of optimal control approaches that harnesses projected value functions by use of machine learning and simulation in an extremely dynamic stochastic setting. The interactive environment facilitates the advancement of robust learning ability and significant flexibility in reinforcement learning that does not employ the model of system dynamics, making it applicable for smart sustainable energy and electric systems having elaborate nonlinearity and unpredictability. Leveraging reinforcement learning across smart sustainable energy and electric systems alters the standard energy utilization mode by using cognitive automation, artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, and real-time sensor networks.
Smart manufacturing is instrumental in advancing more sustainable and effective products [56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]: energy use and quality of manufactured products are satisfactorily supervised, leading to smart sustainable manufacturing, cleaner production, and emission decrease. The sustainability and effectiveness of the smart manufacturing systems are improved by supplying trustworthy input. Data mining is employed on a large scale in manufacturing and service sectors, enabling decisions on acquirable data, and in sustainable manufacturing settings. Additive manufacturing can save energy and lead to cleaner environmental production as a result of the decrease in material and resource use. With the advancements in big data technologies, huge volumes of data are produced during additive manufacturing operations. The upsides of 5G technology are superior reliability and reduced latency, enhancing the real-time performance and monitoring, in addition to decision-making capabilities of sustainable and smart additive manufacturing processes. Product decision-making information systems, technologies, and applications generate huge volumes of data during additive manufacturing product designing, fabrication operations, and product maintenance, articulating the entire manufacturing cycle architecture. As wide-ranging scalability necessitates breakthroughs in operational management practices and energy efficiency systems, blockchain can optimize performance deficiencies, irregular or inadequate services, funding schemes, and controlling networks. Distributed ledger-based technologies may play a part in the management and adoption of sustainable development proposals. Efficiency benefits in public administration operations associated with the feasible leverage of energy from sustainable sources underline the relevance of distributed-ledger technologies whose harnessing is a means to consider and require enhancements in key domains for the adoption of major sustainability initiatives. Distributed-ledger technology is determining in large-scale cross-border undertakings and for heterogeneous stakeholders to influence the digital ecosystem consistent with sustainable development routes.
Advancing economic, data-driven, and resource-efficient farming arrangements to satisfy large-scale nutrient demand is related to the growing population and incessant urbanization [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72] that make food security relevant across sustainable development. Renewable energy and biodegradable/organic waste use may configure sustainable food production systems by use of deep learning-assisted smart process planning, artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems, and cognitive decision-making algorithms, thus enabling the consolidation of circular economy. The energy and material consumption associated with vegetable production operations and the environmental and economic performance throughout sustainable farming systems can be carried out effectively by use of cyber-physical manufacturing systems powered by artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms specific to Industry 4.0 wireless networks. Decarbonization technologies of sustainable energy provision are critical to controlling pervasive greenhouse gas emissions and consequently thoroughly mitigating climate change. Industrial big data analytics, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, sustainable product lifecycle management, and cognitive decision-making algorithms can assist throughout the decarbonization process by use of digital technologies while necessitating minimal investments. Cyber-physical production systems can strengthen efficiency of sustainable energy provision and big data-driven industrial production, definitely straightening out economic viability and low-carbon effects. Digitalization of sustainable energy systems by harnessing cyber-physical production systems redesigns the marginal abatement cost curve and refashions the shift towards an environmentally friendly energy system. When cyber-physical production systems are integrated into artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems, decarbonization technologies may advance considerably while generating unpredictable risks.
A sustainable smart energy system associated with artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, business process optimization, and Internet of Things sensing networks [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82] would surpass standard energy systems that confront pressing environmental and social concerns, while renewable energy systems have diminished reliability as a result of the discontinuous character of energy sources. Peer-to-peer energy communities network electricity end-users and producers on digital platforms enabling them to trade energy cooperatively. By integrating local production and use, connecting reorganized participants, and configuring new markets, peer-to-peer energy communities can further a more sustainable energy system. Sustainable business models may provide system transition value, resulting in the expansion of Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics, refashioning of the energy markets, and asking customers to support a sustainable smart energy system. Due to fluid and unmanageable market alterations, manufacturers have to reorganize their production process so as to satisfy fluctuating consumer demands variably and produce first-rate quality goods competitively while remaining sustainable by cutting down carbon emission and energy use. Behavioral intentions by themselves do not result in pro-environmental consumption, green consumption options entail unrelated aspects in preference over behavioral intentions, and companies’ environmental operations turn consumer’s environmentally friendly intentions into ecologically sound behavior. Companies’ sustainability exposure and low-carbon responsiveness perform the function of driver for energy-efficient consumption practices, constituting the threshold for altering the ulterior motive and consumer’s environmental choices. Energy-efficient awareness considerably moderates the operational connection between ecologically sound disclosure and consumer’s compliance to participate in environmentally responsible consumption activities. Companies’ sustainability exposure in furthering ecologically sound consumption practices should take into account the environmental deterioration generated by human activities.
Advancing towards sustainable energy outcomes in the urban big data-driven environment by coherently assimilating renewable energy systems [83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90] reinforces decarbonization across the clean energy industry and climate change mitigation. Optimizing energy production and storage by use of sustainable strategies to meet subsequent demands and taking measures as regards the climate targets necessitate a significant alteration throughout the energy infrastructure. Climate change mitigation and remodeling approaches demand a predictable impact evaluation of climate change with regard to energy systems and adequate assessment of sustainable energy solutions. Enhancing the energy systems to resist successfully climate dissimilarities in a sound way is critical in carrying out the sustainable energy transition. Improving the network between climate and energy system patterns and furthering the configuration of energy technologies to grapple with subsequent climate variations in an adjustable fashion is instrumental in articulating the sustainable shift of operational systems to renewable energy. To straighten out their efficiency and sustainability, urban energy systems require transition. A sustainable shift of the energy industry is partly responsible for mitigating climate change, but an effective transition needs suitable climate change adaptation while considering climate uncertainties and extremes. Public-sector regions and their energy systems can bring to completion a successful operational shift and climate change adaptation. A robust design can advance the energy system in the direction of superior flexibility and resilience, suppressing irremediable environmental conditions and significant economic downsides.

5. Sustainable Circular Economy Issues in Precision Agriculture and Smart Farming Production Systems

Circular economy assists organizations in carrying out business outcomes [91,92,93,94,95,96,97] by adopting sustainable operations. Business models associated with big data-driven technologies can orient companies toward improving supply chain sustainability outcomes by use of circular economy criteria. Industry 4.0 wireless networks stimulate businesses to set up a consonance between the economic feasibility of their decisions and low-carbon effects, but they necessitate coherent knowledge representation patterns concerning sustainable industrial value creation. Industry 4.0 enables data gathering by use of sensor technologies, so that software tools can inspect data instantaneously through decision support systems that analyze the data flows and further decision-making throughout various levels of investigation. Industry 4.0 boosts the proportion of input distribution across the supply chain, optimizes the product lifecycle straightforwardly, accelerates the accumulation of novel data types, and improves expedient decision-making regarding Internet of Things-enabled sustainability. Inadequate capabilities of standard decision-making approaches demarcate the capacities of companies to thoroughly deploy big data technologies. Cutting-edge software tools and techniques have to be assimilated across smart factories and cyber-physical production systems to facilitate actual assessment of the environmental consequences of manufacturing operations from unrestricted sources. Sensors can assist in gathering suitable data, while protocol advancement for data integration is associated with assimilation of sustainability criteria across smart factories. Industry 4.0 enables adoption of circular economy by leveraging resources, upgrading operations, employment of assets, labor output, handling of records, quality enhancement, cutting down time to market, compatibility between supply and demand, and coherent provision of service and aftersales. Data gathering and inspection capabilities facilitated by Industry 4.0 are decisive in managing sustainability issues, while data sharing assists companies in assimilating sustainability criteria into their business models. An unambiguous and traceable product lifecycle may reduce waste generation and curtail emissions throughout sustainable circular economy. In Industry 4.0 wireless networks, tracking technologies assist companies in supervising manufactured products during their lifecycle and accumulate datasets that necessitate the advancement of precise distribution procedures for clarifying corresponding allocations of environmental burdens across various products and sectors.
Cutting-edge processing technologies and groundbreaking food systems call in question the current operational chains [98,99,100,101,102,103,104] by advancing more sustainably nutritious food options. Advanced food systems develop on inferior technology readiness levels and assessment of their possible subsequent benefits or obstacles constitutes an intricate task as a result of lacking integrated data. The cyber-physical character of modern food is decisive for the engineering of sustainably nutritious food systems. Adoption of machine learning approaches for the gathering, assimilation, and inspection of data related to biomass production and handling on heterogeneous levels results in the accurate investigation of food systems and appraisal of developing advantages, in addition to likely adverse rebound consequences in relation to societal attitude. Data-integrated evaluation systems enable straightforwardness of chains, incorporation of nutritional and environmental features, and configuration of customized nutrition technologies. Food production-consumption chains are promising cyber-physical systems, appropriate for computerized traceability, sustainability determination, and personalized nutrition. Data-driven smart sustainable manufacturing, product decision-making information systems, and digital automated production assists precision farming in organizing various application capabilities related to agricultural processes, e.g., data gathering, sensing-on-the-move techniques, cloud computing, cyber-physical production systems management, Internet of Things sensing and actuation, and autonomous vehicle decision-making algorithms. The networking of agricultural deep learning-assisted smart process planning cyber-physical systems instantaneously optimize efficiency, operational output, animal health, and food quality, while decreasing farm labor expenses. Industry 4.0 wireless networks assisted by artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms and big data analytics can positively impact sustainable smart production systems and circular economy capabilities by reducing environmental pollution.
Big data-driven decision-making processes, digitized mass production, industrial big data analytics, and Internet of Things sensing networks [105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112] can serve as groundbreaking tools in dealing with sustainability issues in precision agriculture and smart farming production systems, thereby ensuring food security and safety, together with ecological sustainability. Product decision-making information systems, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, big data-driven innovation, cloud computing, and sustainable blockchain technologies can be decisive in optimizing environmental stewardship, productivity and yield enhancement, fostering soil and plant health, and water conservation. Machine learning techniques and algorithms can supply real-time analytic clarifications for action-oriented data-driven decision-making algorithms throughout agricultural supply chains, improving their productivity and sustainability. Aiming to attain sustainability in business operations, companies are likely to adopt green practices. Sustainable business practices and operational performance are adequately connected and significantly impact organizational sustainability. Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems give attention to the suitable compatibility between smart-centric resource performance and data-driven sustainable organizational capabilities. With robust stakeholder involvement in organizational structure and functions, companies can harness their resources to attain first-rate operational proficiency by use of Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics while advancing sustainable performance. Organizational dynamic capability is instrumental in configuring a state of coherent sustainability in operational performance developed on deep learning-assisted smart process planning. Companies should judiciously articulate smart-centric resource performance by advancing dynamic capability for data-driven sustainable operations.
Big data configure elaborate cyber-physical production systems instrumental in the economic and green operations of farming [113,114,115,116,117,118,119], serving as a speciation mechanism, bringing about intense competition, and impacting agricultural sustainability, while representing a self-renewable resource for it. Sustainable and smart products constitute cutting-edge manufactured goods typified by servitization and environmental concerns. The growing intricacy of sustainable and smart products makes it difficult for companies to perform data-driven sustainable breakthroughs. Sustainable and smart product innovation furthers the operational stream, integration, and distribution of groundbreaking resources and data by use of cyber-physical production systems, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, cognitive decision-making algorithms, and Internet of Things sensing networks. Sustainable and smart product innovation is a business model synthesis of sustainable product and service. Sustainable industrial value creation, data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing, automated production systems, and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms are instrumental in assimilating sustainability into innovative business models. Sustainable value flows give rise to synergic innovation performance and the coherent and thorough attainment of ecosystem sustainability objectives. Environmentally friendly manufactured goods and services articulate the sustainable and smart product ecosystem developed on Industry 4.0 wireless networks, Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, and cyber-physical manufacturing networks. Sustainable industrial value creation is instrumental in configuring the sustainable and smart product innovation ecosystem through real-time process monitoring, cognitive decision-making algorithms, and artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems.

6. Discussion

Cyber-physical production systems bring about operations shaping social sustainability performance technologically. The digital twin can sense the state of sustainable smart manufacturing systems instantaneously and forecast system failures. Social sustainability, cyber-physical production systems, and performance assessment articulate cutting-edge manufacturing processes. Sustainable smart manufacturing platforms can be networked to assimilate the value chain throughout businesses and constitute a groundbreaking industrial form assisted by cognitive decision-making algorithms. Cognizant, autonomous, and self-configuring omnipresent systems can be instrumental in deep learning-assisted smart process planning. With the adoption of digital twin-based big data-driven sustainable smart production, manufacturing accuracy, product quality, and processing performance would incessantly optimize. The technological and operations management features of cyber-physical systems constitute the components of data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing. Internet of Things-enabled data value chains handle the collection, transfer, and coherent transformation of unprocessed information into applied knowledge. The transparency features facilitated by blockchain may improve the sustainability of cyber-physical system-based smart factories and manufacturing networks. Cyber-physical production systems are pivotal in the advancement of cutting-edge big data-driven smart energy systems.
Implementation of Internet of Things sensing networks, real-time big data analytics, cyber-physical production systems, and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms improve logistics processes, resulting in the sustainability of the retail industry. In Industry 4.0, big data-driven technologies assist in the adoption of a cleaner production approach and the advancement of sustainable smart manufacturing. Deployment of Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems can assimilate supply chain operations, thus enhancing the sustainability of retail companies. Renewable energy and biodegradable/organic waste use may configure sustainable food production systems by use of deep learning-assisted smart process planning, artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems, and cognitive decision-making algorithms. Product sustainable design takes into account environmental, economic, and social sustainability throughout the lifecycle of manufactured goods, thus generating products having significant low-carbon features. Industrial big data analytics, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, sustainable product lifecycle management, and cognitive decision-making algorithms can assist throughout the decarbonization process by use of digital technologies.
Internet of Things smart devices can gather and inspect instantaneous data and together with real-time big data analytics and industrial artificial intelligence can configure end-user behavior and grasp the relevance for stakeholders. Cyber-physical production systems can strengthen efficiency of sustainable energy provision and big data-driven industrial production. By use of Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems, industrial big data and knowledge distributed throughout diverse lifecycle management branches can be decisively enabled. Industry 4.0 wireless networks stimulate businesses to set up a consonance between the economic feasibility of their decisions and low-carbon effects. The implementation of digital twin technology is associated with Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems, covering product design, operational maintenance, and output planning processes, while catalyzing advancements across product lifecycle management.

7. Conclusions

Significant research has lately analyzed whether industrial big data analytics, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, sustainable product lifecycle management, and cognitive decision-making algorithms can assist throughout the decarbonization process by use of digital technologies. By harnessing Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems, industrial big data and knowledge distributed throughout diverse lifecycle management branches can be decisively enabled. Industry 4.0 wireless networks stimulate businesses to set up a consonance between the economic feasibility of their decisions and low-carbon effects. Practical approaches to sustainable cyber-physical production systems across big data-driven smart urban economy can be configured through adopting cognitive automation, advanced robotics, and deep learning-assisted smart process planning developed on artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms. Real-time sensor networks, industrial big data analytics, and Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics are instrumental in articulating digitized mass production in sustainable Industry 4.0. Internet of Things sensing networks, real-time process monitoring, and cognitive decision-making algorithms assist in business process optimization by use of smart connected sensors, with the aim of bringing about smart industrial value creation throughout sustainable product lifecycle management.
The conclusions drawn from the above analyses indicate that sustainable smart manufacturing platforms can be networked to assimilate the value chain throughout businesses and constitute a groundbreaking industrial form assisted by cognitive decision-making algorithms. Implementation of Internet of Things sensing networks, real-time big data analytics, cyber-physical production systems, and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms improve logistics processes.
As to the limitations in this research, by analyzing only articles published in journals indexed in ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in 2019 and 2020, we may have disregarded other relevant sources on sustainable cyber-physical production systems in big data-driven smart urban economy. Future research should investigate whether Industry 4.0-based manufacturing technologies can ensure the sustainability of big data-driven production systems by use of Internet of Things sensing networks and deep learning-assisted smart process planning.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L. and M.A.; methodology, I.H. and I.D.; validation, M.A. and G.L.; investigation, M.I. and I.D.; resources, M.I. and M.A.; data curation, I.H. and G.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A. and M.I.; writing—review and editing, M.A. and I.H.; visualization, G.L. and I.D.; supervision, M.I. and G.L.; project administration, I.H. and I.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pinzone, M.; Albè, F.; Orlandelli, D.; Barletta, I.; Berlin, C.; Johansson, B.; Taisch, M. A framework for operative and social sustainability functionalities in Human-Centric Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 105132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Delicato, F.C.; Al-Anbuky, A.; Wang, K.I.-K. Editorial: Smart Cyber–Physical Systems: Toward Pervasive Intelligence systems. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 107, 1134–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kovacova, M.; Kliestik, T.; Valaskova, K.; Durana, P.; Juhaszova, Z. Systematic review of variables applied in bankruptcy prediction models of Visegrad group countries. Oeconomia Copernic. 2019, 10, 743–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. White, T.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G. Digitized Mass Production, Real-Time Process Monitoring, and Big Data Analytics Systems in Sustainable Smart Manufacturing. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nica, E.; Miklencicova, R.; Kicova, E. Artificial Intelligence-supported Workplace Decisions: Big Data Algorithmic Analytics, Sensory and Tracking Technologies, and Metabolism Monitors. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bratu, S. Nutritional genomics in personalized medicine: Data-driven customized treatments and lifestyle-based disease management and prevention. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2019, 18, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ionescu, L. Robotic Process Automation, Deep Learning, and Natural Language Processing in Algorithmic Data-driven Accounting Information Systems. Anal. Metaphys. 2020, 19, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Russell, H. Sustainable Urban Governance Networks: Data-driven Planning Technologies and Smart City Software Systems. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adams, C. Smart Sustainable Urban Mobility Behaviors: Public Attitudes and Adoption Intentions Concerning Self-Driving Cars. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Napoleone, A.; Macchi, M.; Pozzetti, A. A review on the characteristics of cyber-physical systems for the future smart factories. J. Manuf. Syst. 2020, 54, 305–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Leng, J.; Ruan, G.; Jiang, P.; Xu, K.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Liu, C. Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: A survey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 132, 110112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ngu, H.J.; Lee, M.D.; Bin Osman, M.S. Review on current challenges and future opportunities in Malaysia sustainable manufacturing: Remanufacturing industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 123071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. de Vass, T.; Shee, H.; Miah, S.J. Iot in supply chain management: A narrative on retail sector sustainability. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2020, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, B.; Li, F.; Cao, X.; Li, T. Product Sustainable Design: A Review from the Environmental, Economic, and Social Aspects. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2020, 20, 1–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kliestik, T.; Valaskova, K.; Nica, E.; Kovacova, M.; Lăzăroiu, G. Advanced methods of earnings management: Monotonic trends and change-points under spotlight in the Visegrad countries. Oeconomia Copernic. 2020, 11, 371–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duft, G.; Durana, P. Artificial Intelligence-based Decision-Making Algorithms, Automated Production Systems, and Big Data-driven Innovation in Sustainable Industry 4.0. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Noack, B. Big Data Analytics in Human Resource Management: Automated Decision-Making Processes, Predictive Hiring Algorithms, and Cutting-Edge Workplace Surveillance Technologies. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Popescu Ljungholm, D.; Olah, M.L. Will Autonomous Flying Car Regulation Really Free Up Roads? Smart Sustainable Air Mobility, Societal Acceptance, and Public Safety Concerns. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2020, 19, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Scott, R.; Poliak, M.; Vrbka, J.; Nica, E. COVID-19 Response and Recovery in Smart Sustainable City Governance and Management: Data-driven Internet of Things Systems and Machine Learning-based Analytics. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Porter, T. The Design, Regulation, and Adoption of Autonomous Driving Systems in Smart Sustainable Urbanism. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, S.; Yang, M.; Wang, Y.; Huisingh, D. How can smart technologies contribute to sustainable product lifecycle management? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Androniceanu, A. Major structural changes in the EU policies due to the problems and risks caused by COVID-19. Adm. Manag. Public 2020, 34, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hyers, D. Big Data-driven Decision-Making Processes, Industry 4.0 Wireless Networks, and Digitized Mass Production in Cyber-Physical System-based Smart Factories. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Olsen, M. Using Data Analytics in the Management of Employees: Digital Means of Tracking, Monitoring, and Surveilling Worker Activities. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Graessley, S.; Suler, P.; Kliestik, T.; Kicova, E. Industrial Big Data Analytics for Cognitive Internet of Things: Wireless Sensor Networks, Smart Computing Algorithms, and Machine Learning Techniques. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grayson, J. Big Data Analytics and Sustainable Urbanism in Internet of Things-enabled Smart Governance. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Atwell, G.J.; Lăzăroiu, G. Are Autonomous Vehicles Only a Technological Step? The Sustainable Deployment of Self-Driving Cars on Public Roads. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2018, 11, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. He, B.; Bai, K.-J. Digital twin-based sustainable intelligent manufacturing: A review. Adv. Manuf. 2020, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Androniceanu, A.; Tvaronavičienė, M. Developing a holistic system for social assistance services based on effective and sustainable partnerships. Adm. Manag. Public 2019, 1, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Popescu, G.H.; Valaskova, K.; Majerova, J. Real-Time Sensor Networks, Advanced Robotics, and Product Decision-Making Information Systems in Data-driven Sustainable Smart Manufacturing. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Meyers, T.D.; Vagner, L.; Janoskova, K.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G. Big Data-driven Algorithmic Decision-Making in Selecting and Managing Employees: Advanced Predictive Analytics, Workforce Metrics, and Digital Innovations for Enhancing Organizational Human Capital. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ionescu, D. Deep Learning Algorithms and Big Health Care Data in Clinical Natural Language Processing. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2020, 19, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miller, K. Internet of Things-enabled Smart Devices in Medical Practice: Healthcare Big Data, Wearable Biometric Sensors, and Real-Time Patient Monitoring. Am. J. Med. Res. 2019, 7, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Siekelova, A.; Androniceanu, A.; Durana, P.; Michalikova, K.F. Earnings Management (EM), Initiatives and Company Size: An Empirical Study. Acta Polytech. Hung. 2020, 17, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Keane, E.; Zvarikova, K.; Rowland, Z. Cognitive Automation, Big Data-driven Manufacturing, and Sustainable Industrial Value Creation in Internet of Things-based Real-Time Production Logistics. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Balica, R. Automated Data Analysis in Organizations: Sensory Algorithmic Devices, Intrusive Workplace Monitoring, and Employee Surveillance. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mircică, N. Restoring Public Trust in Digital Platform Operations: Machine Learning Algorithmic Structuring of Social Media Content. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2020, 19, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nelson, A. Neguriță, Big data-driven smart cities: Internet of Things devices and environmentally sustainable urban development. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhuravleva, N.A.; Cadge, K.; Poliak, M.; Podhorska, I. Data Privacy and Security Vulnerabilities of Smart and Sustainable Urban Space Monitoring Systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2019, 11, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mörth, O.; Emmanouilidis, C.; Hafner, N.; Schadler, M. Cyber-physical systems for performance monitoring in production intralogistics. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 142, 106333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, G.; Zeng, G.; Jiang, J.; Fan, C.; Li, R.; Li, K. Energy management for multiple real-time workflows on cyber–physical cloud systems. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 105, 916–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Borocki, J.; Radisic, M.; Sroka, W.; Greblikaite, J.; Androniceanu, A.; Sroka, W. Methodology for Strategic Posture Determination of SMEs. Eng. Econ. 2019, 30, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Throne, O.; Lăzăroiu, G. Internet of Things-enabled Sustainability, Industrial Big Data Analytics, and Deep Learning-assisted Smart Process Planning in Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tisdell, C.; Ahmad, S.; Agha, N.; Steen, J.; Verreynne, M.-L. Microfinance for Wives: Fresh Insights Obtained from a Study of Poor Rural Women in Pakistan. J. Res. Gend. Stud. 2020, 10, 9–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ionescu, L. Digital Data Aggregation, Analysis, and Infrastructures in FinTech Operations. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2020, 19, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Robinson, R. Computationally Networked Urbanism and Sensor-based Big Data Applications in Integrated Smart City Planning and Management. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Lv, J.; Ren, S. Data-driven sustainable intelligent manufacturing based on demand response for energy-intensive industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 123155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, R.; Singh, R.K.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: Analysis of challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 124063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, T.; Zhao, L.; Li, W.; Zomaya, A.Y. Reinforcement learning in sustainable energy and electric systems: A survey. Annu. Rev. Control. 2020, 49, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Coatney, K.; Poliak, M. Cognitive Decision-Making Algorithms, Internet of Things Smart Devices, and Sustainable Organizational Performance in Industry 4.0-based Manufacturing Systems. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Davis, R.; Vochozka, M.; Vrbka, J.; Neguriță, O. Industrial Artificial Intelligence, Smart Connected Sensors, and Big Data-driven Decision-Making Processes in Internet of Things-based Real-Time Production Logistics. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kral, P.; Janoskova, K.; Podhorska, I.; Pera, A.; Neguriță, O. The Automatability of Male and Female Jobs: Technological Unemployment, Skill Shift, and Precarious Work. J. Res. Gend. Stud. 2019, 9, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Bourke, E.; Kovacova, M.; Kliestikova, J.; Rowland, Z. Smart Industrial Internet of Things Devices, Services, and Applications: Ubiquitous Sensing and Sensory Data, Predictive Analytics Algorithms, and Cognitive Computing Technologies. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bennett, S.; Durana, P.; Konecny, V. Urban Internet of Things Systems and Interconnected Sensor Networks in Sustainable Smart City Governance. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ashander, L.; Kliestikova, J.; Durana, P.; Vrbska, J. The Decision-Making Logic of Big Data Algorithmic Analytics. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2019, 11, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Majeed, A.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, S.; Lv, J.; Peng, T.; Waqar, S.; Yin, E. A big data-driven framework for sustainable and smart additive manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Manuf. 2021, 67, 102026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schulz, K.; Gstrein, O.J.; Zwitter, A. Exploring the governance and implementation of sustainable development initiatives through blockchain technology. Futures 2020, 122, 102611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gray-Hawkins, M.; Lăzăroiu, G. Industrial Artificial Intelligence, Sustainable Product Lifecycle Management, and Internet of Things Sensing Networks in Cyber-Physical Smart Manufacturing Systems. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Davidson, R. Cyber-Physical Production Networks, Artificial Intelligence-based Decision-Making Algorithms, and Big Data-driven Innovation in Industry 4.0-based Manufacturing Systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kovacova, M.; Kliestikova, J.; Grupac, M.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G. Automating Gender Roles at Work: How Digital Disruption and Artificial Intelligence Alter Industry Structures and Sex-based Divisions of Labor. J. Res. Gend. Stud. 2019, 9, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Nica, E.; Kliestik, T.; Sabie, O.-M.; Ioanei (Gatan), M.-L. Socio-Affective Technologies for Psychological Health: Emotional Artificial Intelligence in Empathetic Robots. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Walker, A. Internet of Things-enabled Smart Sustainable Cities: Big Data-based Urban Governance, Wireless Sensor Networks, and Automated Algorithmic Decision-Making Processes. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lenhard, R.; Malcho, M.; Jandačka, J. Modelling of Heat Transfer in the Evaporator and Condenser of the Working Fluid in the Heat Pipe. Heat Transf. Eng. 2019, 40, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, L.; Li, X.; Chong, C.; Wang, C.-H.; Wang, X. A decision support framework for the design and operation of sustainable urban farming systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 121928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Inderwildi, O.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Kraft, M. The impact of intelligent cyber-physical systems on the decarbonization of energy. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 744–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nica, E.; Janoskova, K.; Kovacova, M. Smart Connected Sensors, Industrial Big Data, and Real-Time Process Monitoring in Cyber-Physical System-based Manufacturing. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kliestik, T.; Nica, E.; Musa, H.; Poliak, M.; Mihai, E.-A. Networked, Smart, and Responsive Devices in Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ionescu, L. Big Data, Blockchain, and Artificial Intelligence in Cloud-based Accounting Information Systems. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Davis, R. Integrating Digital Technologies and Data-driven Telemedicine into Smart Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lyons, N.; Lăzăroiu, G. Addressing the COVID-19 Crisis by Harnessing Internet of Things Sensors and Machine Learning Algorithms in Data-driven Smart Sustainable Cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Davies, S.; Kovacova, M.; Valaskova, K. Urban Big Data and Internet of Things Sensing Infrastructures in Smart and Environmentally Sustainable Cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tsao, Y.-C.; Thanh, V.-V. A multi-objective fuzzy robust optimization approach for designing sustainable and reliable power systems under uncertainty. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 92, 106317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Plewnia, F.; Plewnia, F. The Transition Value of Business Models for a Sustainable Energy System: The Case of Virtual Peer-to-Peer Energy Communities. Organ. Environ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Crişan-Mitra, C.; Stanca, L.; Dabija, D.-C. Corporate Social Performance: An Assessment Model on an Emerging Market. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kurniadi, K.A.; Ryu, K. Maintaining Sustainability in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems Featuring Green-BOM. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 7, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rustam, A.; Wang, Y.; Zameer, H. Environmental awareness, firm sustainability exposure and green consumption behaviors. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 122016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Williams, A.; Suler, P.; Vrbka, J. Business Process Optimization, Cognitive Decision-Making Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence Data-driven Internet of Things Systems in Sustainable Smart Manufacturing. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Smith, A. Cognitive Decision-Making Algorithms, Real-Time Sensor Networks, and Internet of Things Smart Devices in Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Costea, E.-A. Machine Learning-based Natural Language Processing Algorithms and Electronic Health Records Data. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2020, 19, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hughes, A. Artificial Intelligence-enabled Healthcare Delivery and Real-Time Medical Data Analytics in Monitoring, Detection, and Prevention of COVID-19. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Davidson, R. The Algorithmic Governance of Connected Autonomous Vehicles: Data-driven Decision Support Systems and Smart Sustainable Urban Mobility Behaviors. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dabija, D.-C.; Băbuț, R. Enhancing Apparel Store Patronage through Retailers’ Attributes and Sustainability. A Generational Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Nik, V.M.; Perera, A.; Chen, D. Towards climate resilient urban energy systems: A review. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chessell, D.; Neguriță, O. Smart Industrial Value Creation, Cyber-Physical Production Networks, and Real-Time Big Data Analytics in Sustainable Internet of Things-based Manufacturing Systems. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ionescu, L. Pricing carbon pollution: Reducing emissions or GDP growth? Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Popescu Ljungholm, D. Governing Self-Driving Cars: Do Autonomous Vehicles Pose a Significant Regulatory Problem? Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2019, 18, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sheares, G. Internet of Things-enabled Smart Devices, Biomedical Big Data, and Real-Time Clinical Monitoring in COVID-19 Patient Health Prediction. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sawyer, J. Wearable Internet of Medical Things Sensor Devices, Artificial Intelligence-driven Smart Healthcare Services, and Personalized Clinical Care in COVID-19 Telemedicine. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nelson, A. Smart Transportation Systems: Sustainable Mobilities, Autonomous Vehicle Decision-Making Algorithms, and Networked Driverless Technologies. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Grondys, K.; Androniceanu, A.; Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. Energy Management in the Operation of Enterprises in the Light of the Applicable Provisions of the Energy Efficiency Directive (2012/27/EU). Energies 2020, 13, 4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Esmaeilian, B.; Sarkis, J.; Lewis, K.; Behdad, S. Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 163, 105064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bell, E. Cognitive Automation, Business Process Optimization, and Sustainable Industrial Value Creation in Artificial Intelligence Data-driven Internet of Things Systems. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Harrower, K. Algorithmic Decision-Making in Organizations: Network Data Mining, Measuring and Monitoring Work Performance, and Managerial Control. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bratu, S. Can Social Media Influencers Shape Corporate Brand Reputation? Online Followers’ Trust, Value Creation, and Purchase Intentions. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2017, 18, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Mircică, N. Cyber-Physical Systems for Cognitive Industrial Internet of Things: Sensory Big Data, Smart Mobile Devices, and Automated Manufacturing Processes. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Johnson, A. Medical Wearables and Biosensor Technologies as Tools of Internet of Things-based Health Monitoring Systems. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Peters, E. Sustainable and Smart Urban Transport Systems: Sensing and Computing Technologies, Intelligent Vehicular Networks, and Data-driven Automated Decision-Making. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Smetana, S.; Aganovic, K.; Heinz, V. Food Supply Chains as Cyber-Physical Systems: A Path for More Sustainable Personalized Nutrition. Food Eng. Rev. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Castillejo, P.; Johansen, G.; Cürüklü, B.; Bilbao-Arechabala, S.; Fresco, R.; Martínez-Rodríguez, B.; Pomante, L.; Rusu, C.; Martínez, J.-F.; Centofanti, C.; et al. Aggregate Farming in the Cloud: The AFarCloud ECSEL project. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2020, 78, 103218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bag, S.; Pretorius, J.H.C. Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: Proposal of a research framework. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Peters, E.; Kliestik, T.; Musa, H.; Durana, P. Product Decision-Making Information Systems, Real-Time Big Data Analytics, and Deep Learning-enabled Smart Process Planning in Sustainable Industry 4.0. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wingard, D. Data-driven Automated Decision-Making in Assessing Employee Performance and Productivity: Designing and Implementing Workforce Metrics and Analytics. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ionescu, D. Semantically Enriched Internet of Things Sensor Data in Smart Networked Environments. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Brown, J.; Cug, J.; Kolencik, J. Internet of Things-based Smart Healthcare Systems: Real-Time Patient-Generated Medical Data from Networked Wearable Devices. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sharma, R.; Kamble, S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Kumarcd, V.; Kumar, A. A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. Comput. Oper. Res. 2020, 119, 104926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gupta, S.; Meissonier, R.; Drave, V.A.; Roubaud, D. Examining the impact of Cloud ERP on sustainable performance: A dynamic capability view. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 51, 102028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Clarke, G. Sensing, Smart, and Sustainable Technologies in Big Data-driven Manufacturing. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pera, A. Towards effective workforce management: Hiring algorithms, big data-driven accountability systems, and organizational performance. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Popescu Ljungholm, D. Regulating Government and Private Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Drone Policymaking, Law Enforcement Deployment, and Privacy Concerns. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Miller, E. Networked and Integrated Sustainable Urban Technologies in Internet of Things-enabled Smart Cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Davies, S. Interconnected Sensor Networks and Decision-Making Self-Driving Car Control Algorithms in Smart Sustainable Urbanism. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Androniceanu, A.-M.; Georgescu, I.; Tvaronavičienė, M.; Androniceanu, A. Canonical Correlation Analysis and a New Composite Index on Digitalization and Labor Force in the Context of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lioutas, E.D.; Charatsari, C. Big data in agriculture: Does the new oil lead to sustainability? Geoforum 2020, 109, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yin, D.; Ming, X.; Zhang, X. Sustainable and smart product innovation ecosystem: An integrative status review and future perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 123005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Popescu, G.H.; Zvarikova, K.; Machova, V.; Mihai, E.-A. Industrial Big Data, Automated Production Systems, and Internet of Things Sensing Networks in Cyber-Physical System-based Manufacturing. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bekken, G. The Algorithmic Governance of Data Driven-Processing Employment: Evidence-based Management Practices, Artificial Intelligence Recruiting Software, and Automated Hiring Decisions Social Sciences, Sociology, Management and complex organizations. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kovacova, M.; Kliestik, T.; Pera, A.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G. Big Data Governance of Automated Algorithmic Decision-Making Processes. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2019, 18, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Moore, C. Medical Internet of Things-based Healthcare Systems: Wearable Sensor-based Devices, Patient-generated Big Data, and Real-Time Clinical Monitoring. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Keane, J. Can Self-Driving Cars Lead to Sustainability? Autonomous Smart Sensors, Perception and Planning Algorithms, and Data Processing Efficiency. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Topics and types of paper identified and selected.
Table 1. Topics and types of paper identified and selected.
TopicIdentifiedSelected
sustainable industrial value creation3911
cyber-physical production systems7834
sustainable smart manufacturing5424
smart economy3711
industrial big data analytics3510
sustainable Internet of Things4215
sustainable Industry 4.03814
Type of paper
original research275107
review2512
book40
conference proceedings110
editorial80
Source: Processed by the authors. Some topics overlap.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Iatagan, M.; Hurloiu, I.; Dijmărescu, I. Sustainable Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Big Data-Driven Smart Urban Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 751. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13020751

AMA Style

Andronie M, Lăzăroiu G, Iatagan M, Hurloiu I, Dijmărescu I. Sustainable Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Big Data-Driven Smart Urban Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(2):751. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13020751

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andronie, Mihai, George Lăzăroiu, Mariana Iatagan, Iulian Hurloiu, and Irina Dijmărescu. 2021. "Sustainable Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Big Data-Driven Smart Urban Economy: A Systematic Literature Review" Sustainability 13, no. 2: 751. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13020751

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop