Promoting Sustainability through Assessment and Measurement of Port Externalities: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Paths
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. SLR Results—Key Quantitative Data
4. Discussion of the Results
4.1. On the Dimensions of Port Impacts and Externalities
4.2. Economic and Socio-Economic Impacts and Externalities
4.3. Environmental Externalities
4.4. Social Impacts
4.5. Socio-Environmental
4.6. Tipple Bottom Line Approach: Economic–Social–Environmental
5. Conclusions and Further Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Danielis, R.; Gregori, T. An input-output-based methodology to estimate the economic role of a port: The case of the port system of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, Italy. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2013, 15, 222–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ferrari, C.; Tedeschi, A.; Percoco, M. Ports and local development: Evidence from Italy. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 2010, 37, 1000–1022. Available online: http://0-www-jstor-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/stable/42747893 (accessed on 22 March 2022).
- Santos, A.M.P.; Salvador, R.; Soares, C.G. A dynamic view of the socioeconomic significance of ports. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2018, 20, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelopoulos, J.; Vitsounis, T.; Paflioti, P.; Chlomoudis, C.; Tsamourgelis, I. Reflecting economic activity through ports: The case of Australia. Marit. Transp. Res. 2021, 2, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, J.S.L.; Van De Voorde, E. Green port strategy for sustainable growth and development. In International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports (IFSPA): Transport Logistics for Sustainable Growth at a New Level; Hong Kong Polytechnic University: Hong Kong, China, 2012; Available online: http://worldcat.org/isbn/9789623677578 (accessed on 22 March 2022).
- Marner, T.; Klumpp, M. Employment effects and efficiency of ports. Int. J. Comput. Aided Eng. 2020, 12, 480–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anne, O.; Burskyte, V.; Stasiskiene, Z.; Balciunas, A. The influence of the environmental management system on the environmental impact of seaport companies during an economic crisis: Lithuanian case study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davarzani, H.; Fahimnia, B.; Bell, M.; Sarkis, J. Greening ports and maritime logistics: A review. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2016, 48, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hakam, M.H. Nordic Container port sustainability performance—a conceptual intelligent framework. J. Serv. Manag. 2015, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- PIANC. Sustainable Ports—A Guide for Port Authorities. Report N° 150; Environmental Navigation Commission: Brusells, Belgium, 2014; Available online: http://www.pianc.org (accessed on 22 March 2022).
- Elkington, J. Enter the Triple Bottom Line. In The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up? Henriques, A., Richardson, J., Eds.; Earthscan Books; Routledge: London, UK, 2004; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sislian, L.; Jaegler, A.; Cariou, P. A literature review on port sustainability and ocean’s carrier network problem. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2016, 19, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Haralambides, H.; Zhang, L. Sustainable port development: The role of Chinese seaports in the 21st century Maritime Silk Road. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 2021, 13, 205–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.S.; Shang, K.C.; Lin, C.C. Identifying crucial sustainability assessment criteria for container seaports. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2016, 1, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tawfik, G.M.; Dila, K.A.S.; Mohamed, M.Y.F.; Tam, D.N.H.; Kien, N.D.; Ahmed, A.M.; Huy, N.T. A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Trop. Med. Health 2019, 47, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parola, F.; Risitano, M.; Ferretti, M.; Panetti, E. The drivers of port competitiveness: A critical review. Transp. Rev. 2017, 37, 116–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munim, Z.H.; Dushenko, M.; Jimenez, V.J.; Shakil, M.H.; Imset, M. Big data and artificial intelligence in the maritime industry: A bibliometric review and future research directions. Marit. Policy Manag. 2020, 47, 577–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Chiang, B.G. The role of sustainability practices in international port operations: An analysis of moderation effect. J. Korea Trade 2017, 21, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.S.; Shang, K.C.; Lin, C.C. Examining sustainability performance at ports: Port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains. Marit. Policy Manag. 2016, 43, 909–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, H.; Lee, S.W.; Seo, Y.J. The evaluation of seaport sustainability: The case of South Korea. Ocean Coast Manag. 2018, 161, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, S.; Pettit, S.; Abouarghoub, W.; Beresford, A. Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 72, 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dooms, M.; Haezendonck, E.; Verbeke, A. Towards a meta-analysis and toolkit for port-related socio-economic impacts: A review of socio-economic impact studies conducted for seaports. Marit. Policy Manag. 2015, 42, 459–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheon, S. The economic–social performance relationships of ports: Roles of stakeholders and organizational tension. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 25, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Q.; Lago, P. Exploring service-oriented system engineering challenges: A systematic literature review. Serv. Oriented Comput. Appl. 2009, 3, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Frank, H.; Hatak, I. Doing a research literature review. In How to Get Published in the Best Entrepreneurship Journals; Fayolle, A., Wright, M., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2014; pp. 94–117. [Google Scholar]
- Fink, A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Kraus, S.; Breier, M.; Dasí-Rodríguez, S. The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2020, 16, 1023–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petticrew, M.; Roberts, H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOSviewer manual. Leiden Univeristeit Leiden 2013, 1, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
- Bowen, R.E.; Riley, C. Socio-economic indicators and integrated coastal management. Ocean Coast Manag. 2003, 46, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peris-Mora, E.; Orejas, J.D.; Subirats, A.; Ibáñez, S.; Alvarez, P. Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management. Mar. Poll. Bull. 2005, 50, 1649–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berechman, J.; Tseng, P.H. Estimating the environmental costs of port related emissions: The case of Kaohsiung. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2012, 17, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puig, M.; Wooldridge, C.; Darbra, R.M. Identification and selection of environmental performance indicators for sustainable port development. Mar. Poll. Bull. 2014, 81, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bottasso, A.; Conti, M.; Ferrari, C.; Merk, O.; Tei, A. The impact of port throughput on local employment: Evidence from a panel of European regions. Transp. Policy 2013, 27, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acciaro, M. The role of ports in the development of Mediterranean islands: The case of Sardinia. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 2008, 3, 295–323. [Google Scholar]
- Maragkogianni, A.; Papaefthimiou, S. Evaluating the social cost of cruise ships air emissions in major ports of Greece. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 36, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yap, W.Y.; Lam, J.S.L. 80 million-twenty-foot-equivalent-unit container port? Sustainability issues in port and coastal development. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 71, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mileski, J.; Galvão, C.B.; Von Zharen, W. Port sophistication and country economic status: Seaports as indicators of economic development. Ocean. Yearb. 2016, 30, 541–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shan, J.; Yu, M.; Lee, C.Y. An empirical investigation of the seaport’s economic impact: Evidence from major ports in China. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2014, 69, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, N. The role of the port industry in China’s national economy: An input–output analysis. Transp. Policy 2019, 78, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelopoulos, J. Creating and assessing composite indicators: Dynamic applications for the port industry and seaborne trade. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2017, 19, 126–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musso, E.; Benacchio, M.; Ferrari, C. Ports and employment in port cities. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2000, 2, 283–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, Y.J.; Park, J.S. The role of seaports in regional employment: Evidence from South Korea. Reg. Stud. 2018, 52, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, A.M.; Salvador, R.; Dias, J.C.Q.; Soares, C.G. Assessment of port economic impacts on regional economy with a case study on the Port of Lisbon. Marit. Policy Manag. 2018, 45, 684–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, F.; Wang, D.; Li, B. Spillover effects of ports and logistics development on economic power: Evidence from the Chinese BTH regions. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Artal-Tur, A.; Gómez-Fuster, J.M.; Navarro-Azorín, J.M.; Ramos-Parreño, J.M. Estimating the economic impact of a port through regional input–output tables: Case study of the Port of Cartagena (Spain). Marit. Econ. Logist. 2016, 18, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munim, Z.H.; Schramm, H.J. The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: The mediating role of seaborne trade. J. Ship. Trade 2018, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, J.S.; Seo, Y.J.; Ha, M.H. The role of maritime, land, and air transportation in economic growth: Panel evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries. Res. Transp. Econ. 2019, 78, 100765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, B.M.; Xander, J.A.; White, K.R. The impact of the cruise industry on a region’s economy: A case study of Port Canaveral, Florida. Tour. Econ. 2002, 8, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.T.; Shin, S.H.; Lee, P.T.W. Economic impact of port sectors on South African economy: An input–output analysis. Transp. Policy 2014, 35, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.S.; Seo, Y.J. The impact of seaports on the regional economies in South Korea: Panel evidence from the augmented Solow model. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2016, 85, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheon, S.; Maltz, A.; Dooley, K. The link between economic and environmental performance of the top 10 US ports. Marit. Policy Manag. 2017, 44, 227–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axel, B.N. (Ed.) Environmental Impacts of International Shipping The Role of Ports: The Role of Ports; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2011; Volume 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chlomoudis, C.; Pallis, P.; Platias, C. Environmental Mainstreaming in Greek TEN-T Ports. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darbra, R.M.; Pittam, N.; Royston, K.A.; Darbra, J.P.; Journee, H. Survey on environmental monitoring requirements of European ports. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Laxe, F.G.; Bermúdez, F.M.; Palmero, F.M.; Novo-Corti, I. Sustainability and the Spanish port system. Analysis of the relationship between economic and environmental indicators. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 113, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, S.; Thai, V.V.; Wong, Y.D. Towards Sustainable ASEAN Port Development: Challenges and Opportunities for Vietnamese Ports. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2016, 32, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Papaefthimiou, S.; Sitzimis, I.; Andriosopoulos, K.A. Methodological approach for environmental characterization of ports. Marit Policy Manag. 2017, 44, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puig, M.; Wooldridge, C.; Casal, J.; Darbra, R.M. Tool for the identification and assessment of Environmental Aspects in Ports (TEAP). Ocean Coast Manag. 2015, 113, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Puig, M.; Pla, A.; Seguí, X.; Darbra, R.M. Tool for the identification and implementation of Environmental Indicators in Ports (TEIP). Ocean Coast Manag. 2017, 140, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eswari, K.; Yogeswari, K. Study of Sustainable Indicators for Port Environment in Indian Context. J. Green Eng. 2019, 9, 224–244. [Google Scholar]
- Spengler, T.; Tovar, B. Potential of cold-ironing for the reduction of externalities from in-port shipping emissions: The state-owned Spanish port system case. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 279, 111807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talley, W.K. Port Economics; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez, G.D.M.; Martin-Alcalde, E.; Murcia-González, J.C.; Saurí, S. Evaluating air emission inventories and indicators from cruise vessels at ports. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 2017, 16, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gobbi, G.P.; Di Liberto, L.; Barnaba, F. Impact of port emissions on EU-regulated and non-regulated air quality indicators: The case of Civitavecchia (Italy). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 719, 134984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teerawattana, R.; Yang, Y.C. Environmental performance indicators for green port policy evaluation: Case study of Laem Chabang port. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2019, 35, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quynh, L.X.; Hens, L.; Stoyanov, S. Water management in the framework of environmental management systems in Bulgarian seaports. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2011, 36, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saengsupavanich, C.; Coowanitwong, N.; Gallardo, W.G.; Lertsuchatavanich, C. Environmental performance evaluation of an industrial port and estate: ISO14001, port state control-derived indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chlomoudis, C.; Kostagiolas, P.; Pallis, P. An Analysis of Formal Risk Assessments for Safety and Security in Ports: Empirical Evidence from Container Terminals in Greece. J. Shipp. Ocean Eng. 2012, 2, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roos, E.C.; Neto, F.J.K. Tools for evaluating environmental performance at Brazilian public ports: Analysis and proposal. Mar. Poll. Bull. 2017, 115, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Vaio, A.; Varriale, L.; Alvino, F. Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy. Energy Policy 2018, 122, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muangpan, T.; Suthiwartnarueput, K. Key performance indicators of sustainable port: Case study of the eastern economic corridor in Thailand. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2019, 6, 1603275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, V.; Russo, M.; Sorte, S.; Reis, J.; Oliveira, K.; Dionísio, A.L.; Lopes, M. Harmonizing sustainability assessment in seaports: A common framework for reporting environmental performance indicators. Ocean Coast Manag. 2021, 202, 105514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donnelly, A.; Jones, M.; O’mahony, T.; Byrne, G. Selecting environmental indicator for use in strategic environmental assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2007, 27, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darbra, R.M.; Ronza, A.; Stojanovic, T.A.; Wooldridge, C.; Casal, J. A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports. Mar. Poll. Bull. 2005, 50, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, J.S.L.; Notteboom, T. The greening of ports: A comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transp. Rev. 2014, 34, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acciaro, M.; Ghiara, H.; Cusano, M.I. Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities. Energy Policy 2014, 71, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Pak, M. A Delphi analysis on green performance evaluation indices for ports in China. Marit. Policy Manag. 2017, 44, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, C.; Zhang, D.; Yan, X.; Yang, Z. A novel model for the quantitative evaluation of green port development–A case study of major ports in China. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 61, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, R.H.; Lin, L.H.; Ting, S.C. Evaluation of green port factors and performance: A fuzzy AHP analysis. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 2014, 802976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.Y.; Yeo, G.T. An evaluation of greenness of major Korean ports: A fuzzy set approach. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2012, 28, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Del Saz-Salazar, S.; García-Menéndez, L. Port expansion and negative externalities: A willingness to accept approach. Marit. Policy Manag. 2016, 43, 59–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiegmans, B.W.; Louw, E. Changing port–city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface? J. Transp. Geogr. 2011, 19, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiau, T.A.; Chuang, C.C. Social construction of port sustainability indicators: A case study of Keelung Port. Marit. Policy Manag. 2013, 42, 26–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, T.; Yeo, G.T.; Thai, V.V. Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities: Slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach. Transp. Policy 2014, 33, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatzinikolaou, S.D.; Oikonomou, S.D.; Ventikos, N.P. Health externalities of ship air pollution at port–Piraeus port case study. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 40, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beškovnik, B.; Bajec, P. Application of environmental and social sustainable measures by port of koper: The basis for the regional approach. Probl. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 10, 99–106. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2556857 (accessed on 22 March 2022).
- Antão, P.; Calderón, M.; Puig, M.; Michail, A.; Wooldridge, C.; Darbra, R.M. Identification of occupational health, safety, security (OHSS) and environmental performance indicators in port areas. Saf. Sci. 2016, 85, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ballini, F.; Bozzo, R. Air pollution from ships in ports: The socio-economic benefit of cold-ironing technology. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2015, 17, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tichavska, M.; Tovar, B. Environmental cost and eco-efficiency from vessel emissions in Las Palmas Port. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2015, 83, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schipper, C.A.; Vreugdenhil, H.; De Jong, M.P.C. A sustainability assessment of ports and port-city plans: Comparing ambitions with achievements. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2017, 57, 84–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, B.; Li, Y.; Lio, W.; Li, J. Sustainability efficiency evaluation of seaports in China: An uncertain data envelopment analysis approach. Soft Comp. 2020, 24, 2503–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Lam, J.S.L. Sustainability and interactivity between cities and ports: A two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Marit. Policy Manag. 2018, 45, 944–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanković, J.J.; Marjanović, I.; Papathanasiou, J.; Drezgić, S. Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Port Regions: MCDM Approach in Composite Index Creation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samanés, T.; González-Cancelas, M.N.; Serrano, B.M.; Corral, M.M.E.I. Determination of key operational and environmental performance indicators in dirty solid bulk terminals. Implementation in the Spanish Port System. World Sci. News 2019, 132, 16–34. [Google Scholar]
- Laxe, F.G.; Bermúdez, F.M.; Palmero, F.M.; Novo-Corti, I. Assessment of port sustainability through synthetic indexes. Application to the Spanish case. Mar. Poll. Bull. 2017, 119, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asgari, N.; Hassani, A.; Jones, D.; Nguye, H.H. Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports: Methodology and case study. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2015, 78, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kang, D.; Kim, S. Conceptual model development of sustainability practices: The case of port operations for collaboration and governance. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lirn, T.C.; Wu, Y.C.J.; Chen, Y.J. Green performance criteria for sustainable ports in Asia. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. 2013, 43, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes, R.A.; Alvim-Ferraz, M.C.M.; Martins, F.G.; Sousa, S.I. Environmental and social valuation of shipping emissions on four ports of Portugal. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 235, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morrissey, K.; Burthoo-Barah, S.B.; Dawoonauth, M.; Scandizzo, P.L. Exploring the distributional impact of investment in the port sector on households in Mauritius: A social accounting matrix approach. Mar. Policy 2019, 99, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busquet, M.; Santpoort, R.; Witte, P.; Spit, T. Living on the edge: Identifying challenges of port expansion for local communities in developing countries, the case of Jakarta, Indonesia. Ocean Coast Manag. 2019, 171, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author | Published Papers |
---|---|
Rosa Mari Darbra | 5 |
Chris Wooldridge | 4 |
Claudio Ferrari | 4 |
Young-Joon Seo | 4 |
Martí Puig | 4 |
Jin Suk Park | 3 |
Position | Keyword | Occurrences |
---|---|---|
1 | Port | 14 |
2 | Port management | 7 |
3 | Seaports | 6 |
4 | Sustainability | 5 |
5 | Environmental Performance Indicators | 4 |
6 | Input–output analysis | 4 |
7 | Sustainable development | 4 |
8 | Ship emissions | 4 |
9 | Economic growth | 4 |
10 | Environmental management | 4 |
Academic Journal | Published Papers |
---|---|
Maritime Policy & Management | 7 |
Marine Pollution Bulletin | 7 |
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment | 5 |
Ocean & Coastal Management | 5 |
Transport Policy | 4 |
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review | 4 |
Maritime Economics & Logistics | 3 |
Journal of Environmental Management | 2 |
Sustainability | 2 |
The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics | 2 |
International Journal of Transport Economics | 2 |
Author(s) | Global Citations * | Local Citations ** |
---|---|---|
(Bowen & Riley, 2003) [31] | 412 | 1 |
(Peris-Mora, et al., 2005) [32] | 253 | 17 |
(Berechman & Tseng, 2012) [33] | 156 | 9 |
(Darbra, et al., 2005) [34] | 139 | 4 |
(Puig et al., 2014) [34] | 126 | 11 |
(Bottasso, et al., 2013) [35] | 123 | 5 |
(Acciaro, 2008) [36] | 117 | 7 |
(Maragkogianni & Papaefthimiou, 2015) [37] | 114 | 6 |
(Yap & Lam, 2013) [38] | 111 | 4 |
Type of Externality | Identified Indicator Categories | # of Indicators | # of Papers | % of 17 Papers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Triple Bottom line (6 indices) | Synthetic/Composite Sustainability Indices | 6 | 6 | 35 |
Environmental Indicators (90 indicators) | Air quality/pollution/emissions | 17 | 11 | 65 |
Water quality/pollution condition | 9 | 10 | 59 | |
Terrestrial habitats and Marine ecosystems | 9 | 7 | 41 | |
Waste management | 13 | 8 | 47 | |
Energy consumption | 6 | 9 | 53 | |
Sediment quality and pollution | 12 | 7 | 41 | |
Noise | 2 | 7 | 41 | |
Soil quality | 11 | 5 | 29 | |
Water consumption | 5 | 4 | 24 | |
Environmental training | 6 | 5 | 29 | |
Social Indicators (79 indicators) | Occupational health | 21 | 6 | 35 |
Occupational safety | 10 | 3 | 18 | |
Employment | 11 | 5 | 29 | |
Education and training | 12 | 5 | 29 | |
Human-rights-fairness (Gender Equality, Labour Structure) | 4 | 3 | 18 | |
Security | 12 | 1 | 6 | |
Urbanization | 5 | 4 | 24 | |
Well-Being | 4 | 2 | 12 | |
Economic Indicators (59 indicators) | Added value generated | 4 | 5 | 29 |
Productivity and production capacity | 15 | 4 | 24 | |
Economic and financial ind. | 17 | 5 | 29 | |
Investments | 15 | 5 | 29 | |
Service Levels | 5 | 5 | 29 | |
R&D, port-city interface | 3 | 4 | 18 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Styliadis, T.; Angelopoulos, J.; Leonardou, P.; Pallis, P. Promoting Sustainability through Assessment and Measurement of Port Externalities: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Paths. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8403. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14148403
Styliadis T, Angelopoulos J, Leonardou P, Pallis P. Promoting Sustainability through Assessment and Measurement of Port Externalities: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Paths. Sustainability. 2022; 14(14):8403. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14148403
Chicago/Turabian StyleStyliadis, Theodore, Jason Angelopoulos, Panagiota Leonardou, and Petros Pallis. 2022. "Promoting Sustainability through Assessment and Measurement of Port Externalities: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Paths" Sustainability 14, no. 14: 8403. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14148403