Next Article in Journal
Identification and Classification of the Dissolved Substances from Sludge Biochar and Their Effects on the Activity of Acid Phosphomonoesterase
Next Article in Special Issue
Urban Land-Use Allocation with Resilience: Application of the Lowry Model
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Preparation of a Highly Active Bacterial Suspension for MICP in the South China Sea
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The COVID-19 Epidemic Spreading Effects

Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9750; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14159750
by Chich-Ping Hu
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9750; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14159750
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 5 August 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The methodology and objective are adequately described

Under "3. Descriptive Statistics" the classification of variables into three types is stated.  Can a column be used in Table 1 to classify the variables?

There is no graph (e.g. scatterplot matrix) to illustrate the relationship between the variables. Probably, one would help improve the presentation.

There seems to be missing data in the presentation to help readers connect the variables with particular cities mentioned in the Discussion. It is suggested that the real figures per city can be appended (e.g. density of population in Taipei City; forest area..etc).

Author Response

Dear reviewer 1.

I am so appreciated for your recommendations. Please refer to the table below for the response of suggestions for author. The part marked in yellow in the text is the content of this revision for your reference.

 

Suggestions for Authors

Response

Under "3. Descriptive Statistics" the classification of variables into three types is stated.  Can a column be used in Table 1 to classify the variables?

Thanks for your suggestion. A column is added as the “variable type” in Table 1. Please refer to Line 252.

There is no graph (e.g. scatterplot matrix) to illustrate the relationship between the variables. Probably, one would help improve the presentation.

Thanks for your suggestion. A graph is added as “Figure 3” in the text revised. Pleas refer to Line 281 and Line 296.

There seems to be missing data in the presentation to help readers connect the variables with particular cities mentioned in the Discussion. It is suggested that the real figures per city can be appended (e.g. density of population in Taipei City; forest area..etc).

Thanks for your suggestion. An appendix is added as a supplementary connection with particular cities in the text revised. Please refer to Line 480.

 

 

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript is based on a very interesting perspective and we think it is very useful

1)

Why did you choose to include COVID-19 patient data from January 1, 2022 to May 4, 2022, even though some previous statistical data may be available? It would be good to mention the reason for this.

 

2)

Should the influence of COVID variant characteristics be considered?

 

3) Isn't it assumed that the degree of influence of the presented URBAN DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS depends on the absolute number of affected patients? We have the impression that the impact of the indicators increases exponentially with the number of patients. It would be even better if the authors' views on this point were presented.

Author Response

Dear reviewer 2.

I am so appreciated for your recommendations. Please refer to the table below for the response of suggestions for author. The part marked in yellow in the text is the content of this revision for your reference.

 

Suggestions for Authors

Response

This manuscript is based on a very interesting perspective and we think it is very useful.

Thank you for your recognition of this article.

1)

Why did you choose to include COVID-19 patient data from January 1, 2022 to May 4, 2022, even though some previous statistical data may be available? It would be good to mention the reason for this.

Thanks for your suggestion. The Covid-19 confirmed data during this period is selected because the official release date started on January 1, 2022, and the information is updated daily. The epidemic during this period already contained preliminary virus variants. Please refer to the footnote 2 at Line 224.

2)

Should the influence of COVID variant characteristics be considered?

Thanks for your suggestion. The epidemic during this period already contained preliminary virus variants. Please refer to the footnote 2 at Line 224.

3)

Isn't it assumed that the degree of influence of the presented URBAN DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS depends on the absolute number of affected patients? We have the impression that the impact of the indicators increases exponentially with the number of patients. It would be even better if the authors' views on this point were presented.

Thanks for your suggestion. This study uses linear spatial regression model to estimate the spatial effects impacted from urban development, even if rapid increase in the number of infected people the result finds that urban development indicators significantly affect the number of con-firmed Covid-19 cases. Please refer to Line 270-273 of the txt revised.

Reviewer 3 Report

1. In section 2 (Materials and Methods), the contents from line 58 to line 132 are not related to the "Methodology," they either excluded or extensively revised and included within the introduction part.

2. In section 5 (Conclusion), this part should be revised with emphasis on what is found in the outcomes of the data analysis.

3. The author does not specify the limitations of the study, which is critical for better understanding of the study outcomes. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer 3.

I am so appreciated for your recommendations. Please refer to the table below for the response of suggestions for author. The part marked in yellow in the text is the content of this revision for your reference.

 

Suggestions for Authors

Response

1. In section 2 (Materials and Methods), the contents from line 58 to line 132 are not related to the "Methodology," they either excluded or extensively revised and included within the introduction part.

Thanks for your suggestion. The content of Line 58 to Line 132 of the manuscript is revised and moved to “1. Introduction”. Please refer to the contents from Line 41 to Line 115 of the text revised.

2. In section 5 (Conclusion), this part should be revised with emphasis on what is found in the outcomes of the data analysis.

Thanks for your suggestion. A supplementary note is added in section 5. Please refer to Line 326-333.

3. The author does not specify the limitations of the study, which is critical for better understanding of the study outcomes.

Thanks for your suggestion. A supplementary note is added as limitation of this study in section 1. Please refer to Line 131-135.

Back to TopTop