Next Article in Journal
FLOW-3D Model Development for the Analysis of the Flow Characteristics of Downstream Hydraulic Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Agricultural Price Prediction Based on Combined Forecasting Model under Spatial-Temporal Influencing Factors
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Checkerboard Barriers Attenuate Soil Particle Loss and Promote Nutrient Contents of Soil

Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10492; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su141710492
by Haonian Li, Zhongju Meng *, Xiaohong Dang and Puchang Yang
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10492; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su141710492
Submission received: 27 June 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 15 August 2022 / Published: 23 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Soil Conservation and Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

I have gone through the whole manuscripts. No doubt it's a nice piece of work. However, as a reviewer of this manuscript I have the following few comments on it:

[1] Lots of typos and grammartical error, please read carefully the whole manuscript. Few examples are, P1: L9, 15, 17, 18, 19. P2: L90

[2] Introduction is very complex & difficult to read especially the first paragraph. Please write it more simple way. 

[3] Table 2 is very clumsy, difficult to read. Please make it more simple & clear.  

[4] For listing References, please follow the journal style & be consistant in writing journal names (e.g., 22, 48, 62, 69 etc.)

 

Thank you.

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you very much for your attention and the reviewers’ evaluation and comments on our paper. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researchers.

We have revised the manuscript according to your kind suggestions. We have re-uploaded the revised manuscript. Thank you very much for all your help.

Best regards

Yours sincerely

All Authors

Reviewer 2 Report

I indicated some remarks, questions, and corrections in sticky notes in the pdf file of the manuscript (see attached).

I think the use and meaning of the term 'soil nutrients' must be clarified as well as the more detailed description of them in the material and methods section is necessary.

Please revise the writing of the units (space between the number and the unit, except for %).

Nevertheless, the manuscript is well stuctured, it deals with a topic which has both scientific and practical soundness.

The data processing and the evaluataion of the results are correct.

Minor grammar corrections are needed.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you very much for your attention and the reviewers’ evaluation and comments on our paper. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researchers.

We have revised the manuscript according to your kind suggestions. We have re-uploaded the revised manuscript. Thank you very much for all your help.

Best regards

Yours sincerely

All Authors

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you so much for the corrections.

Back to TopTop