Next Article in Journal
Reliability as a Key Driver for a Sustainable Design of Adaptive Load-Bearing Structures
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Impacts of Climatic and Land Use Changes on Habitat Suitability and Protected Area Adequacy across the Asian Elephant’s Range
Previous Article in Journal
Innovation and Patenting within Containerized Liner Shipping
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Role and Importance of Multi-Kingdom Communities in Mediterranean Wood-Pastures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutrient Analysis and Species Diversity of Alpine Grasslands: A Comparative Analysis of Less Studied Biodiversity Hotspots

1
Department of Botany, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri 185234, India
2
Division of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chatha, Jammu 180009, India
3
Department of Botany, Government Degree College Tral, Pulwama 192123, India
4
Department of Botany, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi 284128, India
5
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Limnoecology Research Group, University of Pannonia, Gyetum u. 10m, H-8200 Veszprem, Hungary
6
Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(2), 887; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14020887
Submission received: 22 November 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 13 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity in Terrestrial Ecosystems)

Abstract

:
The alpine grasslands of Kashmir Himalaya act as a treasure house of floristic biodiversity. They have remained largely unstudied because of their remoteness and inaccessibility. It is imperative to have quantitative studies of these areas to allow the long-term monitoring of flora in these fragile ecosystems. During the present study, nutrient analysis and species diversity of some alpine grasslands were investigated. Electroconductivity (EC) of the soils ranged between 0.12 and 0.33 (dSm−1). With an increase in altitude and precipitation and a decrease in temperature, soil pH and available macro-nutrients (OC, N, P, K) show a considerable decrease. Sixty-six plant species belonging to twenty-nine families and fifty-one genera were reported with members predominantly from the Asteraceae, Rosaceae and Plantaginaceae families. Seven species were common to all study areas and Renyi diversity profiles showed that Kongwattan was the most diverse followed by Poshpathri and Yousmarg. The results of the Sorensen β diversity index showed a relatively lower dissimilarity index among the three studied alpine sites. In the majority of the growth forms, growth initiation was recorded in April, whereas senescence occurred in September. The highest bloom was seen in June-July. The plant species exhibited a greater variability in their phenophases under different environmental conditions and altitudinal gradients. Plants were more vigorous at lower altitudes and showed rapid response to the prevailing conditions. Stoloniferous forbs and tussock forming graminoids such as Sibbaldia cuneata, Trifolium repens, Plantago major, Trifolium pratense, Poa compressa, Poa angustifolia, and Plantago lanceolata showed a greater importance value index (IVI). The sedentary system of livestock rearing at Yousmarg resulted in the decreased density of the palatable species. This study allowed us to conclude that direct knowledge of soil nutrient composition and species diversity in alpine ecosystems can enhance conservation and ensure better management practices over a period of time.

1. Introduction

The Himalaya is home to one of the most diverse and unique ecosystems on the planet [1]. Himalayan alpine plant communities are ecologically significant because they govern soil stability, play an important role in ecosystem functioning, and are important in cultural, ethical, and aesthetic aspects [2]. These regions show low productivity due to unusual seasonal fluctuations with respect to abrupt changes in the wind velocity, low temperature, permafrost, extremely cold winters, and heavy snowstorms [3]. The flora of these fragile ecosystems responds to the severe climatic conditions by growing in sparse populations, showing reduced morphological characteristics, and developing a mosaic patch of different forms. Alpine plants show an early growth initiation with a short vegetative span ranging from several days to a few months [4]. Himalayan grasslands are important both ecologically and economically [5]. They harbor the world’s largest freshwater sources. In India, the Himalaya extends from Jammu and Kashmir to north-eastern India through Sikkim, occupying an area of 236,000 Km2. Kashmir Himalaya constitutes the northern most part of the Indian Himalayan region [6]. The importance of the Himalaya in Kashmir is substantiated by the fact that a sizeable population of Jammu and Kashmir directly or indirectly depend upon it. Jammu and Kashmir, the western extremity of the Himalayan Mountain chain, sustain a predominantly large number of alpine grasslands [7] which spread above the timberline and below the snow-covered mountain peaks of the Zanskar and Pir Panjal mountain ranges. Such grasslands are dominated by herbaceous plant communities that grow in tussocks [8,9].
Grasslands provide various ecological functions, including biodiversity conservation, control of physical and chemical fluxes in ecosystems, pollution mitigation, and landscape preservation [10,11,12]. Alpine grasslands consist of two management categories, meadows and pastures. These are highly valued for their great species diversity in comparison to forest and shrub vegetation [13,14,15,16]. Soil pH, bulk density, available nutrients and moisture, temperature, photoperiod, and soil organic carbon (SOC) are the major factors that determine the biodiversity of the alpine regions [17,18,19]. Soils which are acidic (pH < 7) show less plant diversification [20,21,22]. High soil organic carbon increases soil water-holding ability, thereby increasing water-retention capacity and sustaining soil fertility [23]. In grassland ecosystems, soil bulk density (SBD) affects the microbial activity, aeration, soil porosity, nutrient composition, and water holding capacity of soil which influences floristic diversity [24,25,26]. In addition, the floristic composition of alpine grasslands is also influenced by various anthropogenic activities, livestock management practices, and different levels of livestock density and/or the use of feed supplements [27].
For the past several decades, the Himalayan meadows have been heavily grazed [28,29,30,31]. The rise in the livestock population and the decrease in the grazing area has resulted in the overgrazing of these fragile ecosystems [32,33]. According to the reports of Malik [34], available grazing space in Kashmir’s subalpine and alpine pastures dropped from 0.15 ha/animal in 1977 to 0.10 ha/animal in 1982 [35]. The area of these grasslands shows significant contraction and continued to decline thereafter [36]. Overgrazing compounded with trampling has resulted in the general degradation of community structure of these fragile ecosystems. Besides harboring the plant diversity with immense medicinal values, these meadows are major sources of forage to livestock and provide territory for a huge range of wild fauna [37]. These alterations have led to a change in the composition and overall growth patterns of the plant species inhabiting these ecosystems [38,39].
Understanding of the soil nutrient composition, biodiversity pattern, and phytosociological interactions becomes imperative in ecological studies and landscape conservation. From different plant community studies, it is evident that the floristic diversity of an area affects its ecosystem functions [40,41], particularly its stability and productivity [42]. In the north-western mountains of the Kashmir Himalaya, attempts to study the distribution pattern and community structure of alpine grasslands have been made by different researchers, however, they remain poorly understood due to their remoteness, inaccessibility, danger, and lack of local infrastructure [43,44]. In the present study, we made an integrated effort to (1) focus on the impact of altitude, temperature, and precipitation on the soil pH, nutrient composition, and bulk density of different alpine grasslands, (2)study the floristic composition and phenology of different alpine grasslands, (3) understand the variation in the phenology and growth characteristics of plant species at different study areas, and (4) to study the dominance pattern and impact of grazing on species composition at different alpine grasslands. Statistical analysis was performed using different statistical analyses with R software.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites

The present study was carried out at the alpine regions of Yousmarg, Poshpathri and Kongwattan in Kashmir, India. Yousmarg lies in the Pir Panjal range of Kashmir Himalaya and is renowned for harboring a large number of alpine grasslands. The study was conducted in the upper reaches at 2831 m above mean sea level (m.a.s.l.). These areas remain free from snow from April to late October. In early growing months (April and May), the weather is cloudy and foggy, however, in June, July and August, itis clear with bright and longer durations of sunlight. The alpine grasslands of Poshpathri-Tral lie in the Zanskar mountainous range of Kashmir Himalaya. The grassland is located at 3103 m.a.s.l. The grassland of the Kongwattan lies in the Pir Panjal range of Kashmir Himalaya. It is located in the Kulgam district at an altitude of about 3347 m.a.s.l. The study was carried out on a gentle slope at all three sites. Poshpathri is situated on the southern slope of the mountain range, while Yousmarg and Kongwattan are on the northern slope. The meteorological information of all the sites during different months was provided by the Meteorological Department, Rambagh, Srinagar (J and K) and is given in Figure 1.

2.2. Soil, pH, Nutrient Analysis, and Bulk Density

Hydrogen ion concentration (pH) of the soil samples was determined in 1:2.5 soil:water ratio (w/v) with the help of a glass electrode pH meter [45]. Electrical conductivity was estimated in 1:2.5 soil:water suspension with EC meter [45]. The texture class of the soil was determined by the hydrometer method [46]. Organic carbon was estimated by the rapid titration method [47]. Available nitrogen was determined by using alkaline permanganate as per the modified Kjeldahl method [48]. Available phosphorus was extracted from the soil with 0.5 M NaHCO3 (pH 8.5) and determined by the ammonium molybdate blue color method using a spectrophotometer [49]. A total of 1 N ammonium acetate was used as an extractant and the available potassium content was determined by feeding the extract to a flame photometer [45]. Exchangeable Ca was analyzed using ammonium acetate extract through the EDTA method. Available micronutrients (Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe) were analyzed through the DTPA extractable method [50]. The bulk density of the study areas was determined by the soil core sampling method [51].

2.3. Floristic Composition and Phenological Studies

Regular field visits were made from April to October at all three study sites to determine their floristic composition. Flora analysis was performed by placing random quadrats (1 m2), following Dad and Khan, [52]. Unknown plant species were identified with the help of regional floras of Dhar and Kachroo [53]. The phenology of the species was recorded throughout the study period from April to October. Data on each of the six phenophases viz. germination, vegetative growth, flowering, fruiting, seed maturation, and senescence were recorded [54,55]. The appearance of the first leaf in case of dicots was considered as initiation of germination [54,55], while in the case of graminoids seedlings upto 2 cm length were considered in the germination phase [55].
The impact of different environmental conditions (temperature and precipitation) and edaphic factors (altitude) was studied on the phenology (germination, vegetative phase, flowering, fruiting, seed maturation, and senescence) of the plant species.

2.4. Species Dominance Pattern

The quadrat method was used for the collection of such data following the method outlined by Curtis and Cottam [56]. Appropriate numbers of quadrats (1 m2) were laid randomly in the study area. Density and abundance were calculated on a per meter square basis. Frequency was determined by dividing the total number of quadrants in which species were present by the total number of quadrants laid, and multiplying the result by 100. The seasonal changes in the flora were studied through tiller analysis [57]. Other structural parameters of different grasslands were reported using the following formulae:
Relative   density = number   of   individuals   of   particular   species total   number   of   individuals   in   area × 100
Relative   frequency = frequency   value   of   particular   species total   of   all   frequency   values   for   all   species × 100
Area = C2/4π
Relative area = Basal cover of particular species/Total basal area
IVI = Relative density + Relative frequency + Relative area

2.5. Statistical Analysis

2.5.1. Ecological Indices

All analyses were conducted in R software v4.0.2 [58]. We used the Renyi diversity profile approach to calculate the plant species diversity of the three studied alpine sites using the vegan (v2.5-7) package [59]. Renyi diversity profiles are a function dependent parametric family of diversity indices that reflect sensitivity to rare and common species and display a graphical ordering of community diversity [60,61,62]. Renyi diversity profile values (Hα) were calculated from the frequencies of each contributing species and a scaling parameter (α) that ranges from zero to infinity [63] according to the following formula:
H α = 1   1 1 α   l n i S p   i α
where pi is the proportion abundance of each species and α is a scaling parameter [47,49,51]. The values of the Renyi profile at the given scales of 0, 1, 2, and ∞ correspond to species richness (S), the Shannon diversity index (H′), the Simpson diversity index (D−1) and the Berger–Parker diversity index (d−1), respectively [62,63]. According to the Renyi diversity profile, a community can be regarded as more diverse if all of its Renyi diversities are higher than that of the other community [60,62]. We calculated the diversity values in the current study at the α scale of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and infinity (∞) and plotted the diversity profiles for each site separately.

2.5.2. β-Diversity

To gain an in-depth understanding of composition change between the studied alpine sites, we calculated the turnover (i.e., species replacement between sites) and nestedness (i.e., species gain or loss between sites) components of beta diversity to study spatial patterns of turnover and nestedness-resultant dissimilarity among the three sites using a betapart package [64]. More specifically, it partitions the pairwise Sorenson dissimilarity between the two sites (βsor) into two additive components which in turn account for species spatial turnover (βsim) and nestedness-resultant dissimilarities (βsne) [65].

2.5.3. Predictors of Phenological Stages

We evaluated the relative effects of altitude, temperature, and precipitation on different phenological events with the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and a Poisson error distribution using the lme4package [66]. Model performance was evaluated with the help of the Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes (AICc) and the marginal (mR2) and conditional (cR2) R2 values, using the ‘dredge’ function in the Mu Min package [67] to select the simplest model with ΔAICc < 2.

2.5.4. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient

We also performed Pearson’s multiple correlation between community indices (i.e., plant species richness, diversity, and evenness measures) and environmental variables (temperature, precipitation, and altitude). The statistical significance associated with the resulting correlation was detected at the 5% level.

3. Results

3.1. Nutrient Analysis

The soil pH showed a considerable decrease with an increase in altitude and precipitation. pH at Yousmarg ranged between 7.11 and 8.3, while at Kongwattan the pH of the soil ranged between 6.3 and 6.5. Electroconductivity of the soil ranged from 0.18 ± 0.03 dSm−1 (at Yousmarg) to 0.19 ± 0.04 (at Kongwattan). Soil organic carbon and macro soil nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) showed a significant decrease with an increase in altitude and precipitation, and a decrease in the temperature. The highest organic carbon was reported at Yousmarg (2.33 ± 0.31) followed by Poshpathri (1.84 ± 0.29) and Kongwattan (1.45 ±0.36). The concentration of the micronutrients (zinc, iron, calcium, and copper) did not show any significant change with respect to change in altitude, temperature, and precipitation. There were no significant statistical differences in the bulk density and electroconductivity of soils at different study areas. Bulk density ranged between 1.23 ± 0.9 (at Kongwattan) and 1.34 ± 1 Mgm3 (at Yousmarg). Detailed results are provided in Table 1.

3.2. Floristic Composition

During the entire study period, 23 plant species from17 genera and 17 families were documented at Yousmarg Budgam, 32 plant species from 25 genera and 18 families were reported at Poshpathri Tral, and 36 plant species from 32 genera and 21 families were reported at Kongwattan Kulgam. Only 7 plant species were common at all the three study sites, while Yousmarg had 9 exclusive plant species, Tral had 15, and Kongwattan had 22. A total of 9 plant species were common between the Yousmarg and Poshpathri grasslands, 10 between Poshpathri and Kongwattan, and 5 common species were reported from the grasslands of Kongwattan and Yousmarg (Table 2).
Environmental (temperature, precipitation) and edaphic (altitude) factors at different grasslands show a profound effect on the dominance pattern of the plant families. Asteraceae followed by Plantaginaceae and Polygonaceae were the dominant families with the highest genera and species at Kongwattan. Rosaceae followed by Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, and Fabaceae dominated the flora at Poshpathri, while Rosaceae followed by Polygonaceae, Plantaginaceae, Caryophylliaceae and Poaceae with a maximum number of genera and species dominated the flora of the alpine grassland at Yousmarg (Figure 2).

3.3. Phenology

The phenological spectrum as analyzed for the various plant species documented during the survey in the alpine grasslands of Kashmir Himalaya revealed that all the plants exhibited a distinct phenological pattern corresponding to their response to the harsh climatic conditions of the alpine grasslands. In alpine conditions the climate is not favorable for plant growth throughout the year, thus the plants have got a fixed period of 7–8 months to complete their life cycle. Germination of most plant species started in April following the melting of the snow. The melting of the snow makes moisture available which is necessary for germination. This period also witnessed a temperature increase favoring plant germination. The highest percentage of germination was recorded in April, followed by May and June. The highest number of species in the vegetative phase was found in May followed by June and July. The flowering of the plant species was observed from May to August. The highest number of plants in the flowering phase was seen in July followed by June, May, and August. Fruiting started in June and ended in September. The highest percentage of plants in the fruiting phase was seen in August followed by July and September. The signs of seed set were seen from the month of July. The highest number of species in the seed maturation phase was observed in September followed by August. By the end of September almost all of the species entered their senescence phase. Though the majority of the plant species completed their life cycle by the end of September, some plant species were found to be in the final stage of their life cycle (senescence) in October (Supplementary Tables S1–S3).

3.4. Impact of Environmental and Edaphic Factors on the Phenology of Plant Species

The climate and edaphic factors provide a significant impact on the germination and senescence of the plant species, whereas flowering, fruiting, and seed maturation were least affected. Lower altitude and precipitation and higher temperature at Yousmarg resulted in the early germination of Taraxicum officinale, Ranunculus hirtellus, Iris hookeriana, Sibbaldia cuneata, Poa compressa, Plantago major, and Trifolium repens as compared to the grassland sites at Poshpathri and Kongwattan where germination started in May. Similar phenological shifts were seen for plant species that were common between different study areas (Kongwattan and Poshpathri, Kongwattan and Yousmarg, Poshpathri and Yousmarg). Senescence of the plant species was initiated earlier at Kongwattan where the majority of the plant species entered their senescence phase in the month of September. Detailed results are provided in Figure 3.

3.5. Environmental Correlates of Phenological Stages

The results of the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are shown in Figure 4 and Table 3. The results indicate that temperature and elevation were the most influential environmental variables which significantly affected all of the studied phenological stages except vegetative growth and reaching mR2 value from 0.34 to 0.94 (Figure 4; Table 3). In contrast, precipitation had a significant effect on germination, vegetative growth, seed maturation, and senescence only (Figure 4; Table 3).

3.6. Species Dominance Pattern

Density, frequency, and abundance were reported on a monthly basis from April to October to determine the effect of grazing, temperature, and precipitation on plant species. Relative density, relative frequency, cover, and relative cover was analyzed to determine the importance value index (IVI). A definite trend in the increase of temperature, favorable precipitation, least pressure of grazing, and a considerable increase in the density of plant species was reported from April to July at all three grasslands. However, the decrease in temperature and movement of shepherds to these areas to feed their livestock resulted in a drastic decrease in the density of plant species from July onwards. While analyzing the density of the plant species, it was calculated that Trifolium repens, Poa angustifolia, Poa compressa, Sibbaldia cunenata, Mazus reptans, Trifolium pratense, Primula denticulata, and Myosotis stricta showed the highest density, while Impatiens brachycentra, Geum vernum, Viola biflora, Arabis alpina, Arenaria stricta, Crepis sancta, and Fimbristylis dichotoma were the least dense plant species at their respective sites. The highest total tiller density was reported at Kongwattan followed by Poshpathri and Yousmarg. Grazing intensity was highest at Yousmarg, while Kongwattan showed the lowest pressure of grazers and tramplers. The grassland of Yousmarg is located at an altitude of below 3000 m.a.s.l. and receives a sedentary system of livestock rearing. To feed their livestock, shepherds and the Bakharwal tribe show early and prolonged movement to these regions. This results in greater anthropogenic stress causing the decreased diversity of palatable species and the increased density of non-palatable species, such as C. falconeri, C. wallichii, etc. Stoloniferous forbs and tussock forming graminoids were the dominant groups at these alpine grasslands. Based on importance value index (IVI), Trifolium repens, Sibbaldia cuneata, Poa compressa, Plantago major, Plantago lanceolata, Trifolium pratense, Poa angustifolia, Primula denticulata, and Sambucus wightiana dominated the flora composition on these alpine grasslands (Table 4). Plant species such as Trifolium repens, Trifolium pratense, Sibbaldia cuneata, Plantago major, Poa compressa, Poa annua, and Plantago lanceolata were reported to be the most frequent plant species with a frequency percentage greater than 50%. Plant species such as Viola biflora, Thymus serpyllum, Rheum webbianum, Podophyllum hexandrum, Fimbristylis dichotoma, Epilobium hirsutum, Cardamine impatiens, and Capsella bursa-pastoris were the least frequent plant species with a frequency percentage less than 5%.

3.7. Species Diversity

The Renyi diversity profiles of the three studied alpine sites are presented in Figure 5. The results showed that among all three sites Kongwattan is the most diverse followed by Poshpathri, and Yousmarg. In addition, this pattern of Kongwattan being the most diverse is consistent with all the α values used (Figure 5).

3.8. β-Diversity

The results of the multiple-site dissimilarities are shown in Figure 6. The results indicate that the Sorensen dissimilarity among the three studied alpine sites was relatively low. Furthermore, the nestedness component (βsne) was found to contribute largest to the overall dissimilarity among the studied sites, as shown by the higher peak of βsne (nestedness-resultant dissimilarity) (Figure 6A). This in turn reflects that the observed dissimilarity among the sites is most likely a consequence of richness difference (i.e., nestedness component) and to a lesser extent because of species replacement (i.e., turnover component). Moreover, the clustering obtained from the dissimilarity matrices of the turnover component showed that Poshpathri was highly dissimilar to the other two sites (Yousmarg and Kongwattan), which were similar to a greater extent as they formed the same sub-cluster (Figure 6B). Contrary to this, the clustering obtained from the dissimilarity matrices of nestedness showed a quite different pattern in which the Yousmarg site was highly dissimilar to the other two sites (PP and KW), which were similar to a greater extent as they formed the same sub-cluster (Figure 6C).

3.9. Correlation

The results of the multiple correlation are presented in Figure 7. The results indicate that species richness is positively correlated with altitude, precipitation, Shannon diversity, and Simpson diversity (r = 0.96, 0.72, 1, and 1, respectively), but the resultant correlation is significant only between species richness and Shannon diversity index (p < 0.05). Similarly, species richness is negatively correlated with temperature and Pielou’s evenness (r = −0.9 and −1, respectively), but the resultant correlation is significant between species richness and Pielou’s evenness only (p < 0.05). In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between Shannon diversity index and Simpson diversity index (r = 1; p < 0.05) and a significant negative correlation between Shannon diversity index and Pielou’s evenness (r = −1; p < 0.05) and between Simpson diversity index and Pielou’s evenness (r = −1; p < 0.05) (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

Grasslands account for about 40% of total land area and thus act as a significant ecosystem on a global scale [68]. Grasslands are a key component of Alpine and pre-Alpine landscapes, with a wide range of appearances ranging from heavily exploited grasslands in the lower areas to very diverse seasonal alpine pastures and specialized natural ecosystems at the higher elevations [69,70]. Besides providing significant economic value, alpine pastures deliver a wide range of ecosystem services, such as storage and cycling of different nutrients (prominently nitrogen and carbon) and water retention [71,72,73]. Previous studies have shown that species diversity decreases with increasing altitude [74]. In our study, species diversity increased with an increase in altitude. This is possibly due to the sedentary livestock grazing at the lower alpine sites, resulting in decreased species diversity as compared to higher diversity at upper alpine reaches where the pressure of grazing and trampling is less [75,76].
Soil pH values increased with the increase in altitude and the decrease in temperature at different grassland sites. These results are consistent with the findings of Yimer et al. [77], Oyonarte et al. [78], and Roukos et al. [79]. At warmer temperatures, decomposition results in greater soil organic carbon density [80] which tends to increase the concentration of H+ ions [81], resulting in lower pH at lower altitudes with higher temperatures. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium get significantly reduced with increased altitude. These findings are supported by the results of Bhandari and Zhang [82] who also reported similar findings on the grasslands of Tibet, China, and Manang District, Nepal.
The flora of alpine regions face demanding environmental conditions with cold soils having low moisture and low winter temperatures with extended permafrost and a brief growing season [83,84]. To cope with such adverse conditions, plants of alpine regions show various morphological and physiological adaptations and tend to complete their life cycle within a short duration during favorable climatic conditions [85,86,87]. The survival of most species in the grasslands can also be attributed to a modest degree of species competition during early regeneration, which has resulted in the dominance of only a few species [88]. In the present study, plant species from the Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Plantaginaceae, and Rosaceae families were dominant and this can be attributed to their adaptation to the alpine environment by producing large amount of seeds and showing diverse reproductive strategies.
Prolonged snow cover, reduced photoperiod, low temperature, and frost (hence, the lack of moisture) during the early months of the spring prevent the plant species from overcoming their dormancy [89,90,91]. The weather shift from late March results in a change in environmental conditions on the alpine grasslands. The increase in temperature not only results in the melting of snow, which makes optimum soil moisture available for the floral evocation of plant species, but also helps in breaking the dormancy of seeds and buds under the alpine conditions. During this study, species specific responses to environmental conditions were reported while analyzing the germination at these grasslands. About 76.26% of the plant species started germination in the month of April, while the remaining 23.74% of the plant species germinated in the month of May. While analyzing the effect of climate change on plant species at different alpine grasslands, various investigators reported that the change in the weather conditions (increase in temperature, melting of snow, change in photoperiod, melting of permafrost) during the early days of spring played a vital role in the germination of the plant species [92,93,94].
Observations made to assess the floral evocation of plants revealed that flowering attains its peak in July, exploiting the period of most favorable climatic conditions. Such observations are supported by the findings of different researchers who also reported direct proportionality of peak flowering with peak temperatures [89,95,96,97,98]. Plant species tend to complete their life cycle before they face a drastic decline in temperature and precipitation in the alpine regions. Completing their life cycle within the stipulated time of 7–8 months was observed to be an important adaptation by these alpine plants to survive the severe conditions of the alpine regions. Vashistha [98], while studying the phenology of plant species at an alpine region of north-west Himalaya (India), also reported initiation of senescence from September onwards and reported that the plants of alpine regions exploit the favorable weather conditions in such a way that they complete their whole life cycle within this period (April–October).
IVI analysis gives information about a species’ social interactions and may be identified as a pattern of dominating species in a population [99]. IVI analysis revealed distinct combinations of species with different dominants and co-dominants at different study sites. Based on the importance value index (IVI), dominance of the plant species reflects a considerable degree of variation. Sibbaldia cuneata, Trifolium repens, Plantago major, Trifolium pratense, Poa compressa, Poa angustifolia, and Plantago lanceolata depicted wide amplitude and showed greater IVI (more dominant) as compared to other plant species, reflecting their adaptation to the conditions of alpine regions. The species found to be dominant were rhizomatous and grow as tussocks. Such observations are supported by the results of different workers [100,101] who also reported these plant species to be dominant on other alpine grasslands of the western Himalayas. Changing environmental conditions and pressure caused by grazers and tramplers exert an immense impact on the community characteristics of plants in alpine regions. A considerable increase in the values of density and frequency of plant species upto July was observed to be in accordance with the increase of favorable climatic conditions and minimal grazing pressure. A decline in such values from July onwards is attributed to the change in weather conditions (temperature, precipitation, and photoperiod) and the increase of anthropogenic pressure caused by the grazers and tramplers. Such results are in accordance with the findings of other researchers [102,103] who also reported a decline in the density and frequency values due to climate change and an increase in grazing.

5. Conclusions

The present work on the nutrient analysis, species diversity, and ecological analysis allowed us to conclude that:
Nutrient composition (N, P, K) of the alpine soil show negative correlation with altitude and precipitation and positive correlation with temperature.
The altitudinal gradients and grazing intensity had a significant impact on the floristic diversity of alpine grasslands in Kashmir Himalaya.
The phenology of the plant species is significantly affected by the altitude, temperature, and precipitation at different study areas.
Observations related to the phenology have radically proved that certain factors such as low temperature, heavy snowfall, frost, and high altitude interfere with the vegetative growth of plant species, and are essential for the morphogenesis of flowering.
Renyi diversity profiles show that the alpine grassland of Yousmarg has the least floristic diversity due to a sedentary system of livestock rearing.
The Sorensen β diversity index reveals a relatively great similarity index among the studied sites which reflects the adaptability of the plant species in the higher altitudes of alpine regions.
Stonliferous forbs and tussock forming graminoids such as Sibbaldia cuneata, Trifolium repens, Plantago major, Trifolium pratense, Poa compressa, Poa angustifolia and Plantago lanceolata showed greater importance value index (IVI) and dominated the floristic composition of these regions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/su14020887/s1, Table S1: Phenology of plant species at Yousmarg. Table S2: Phenology of plant species at Poshpathri. Table S3: Phenology of plant species at Kongwattan.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.V., M.M.G. and G.N. methodology, I.A.W. and R.G.; software, I.A.W.; validation, S.V., I.A.W., M.M.G. and G.N.; formal analysis, M.M.G. and S.V.; investigation, I.A.W.; resources, M.M.G. and R.G.; data curation, S.V.; writing—original draft preparation, I.A.W. and S.V.; writing—review and editing, I.A.W. and R.G.; visualization, G.N. and M.M.G.; supervision, S.V. and G.N.; project administration, H.M.S. and F.A.A.-M.; funding acquisition, F.A.A.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP-2021/24), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Salick, J.; Zhendong, F.; Byg, A. Eastern Himalayan alpine plant ecology, Tibetan ethnobotany, and climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2009, 19, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stirling, G.; Wilsey, B. Empirical relationships between species richness, evenness, and proportional diversity. Am. Nat. 2001, 158, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nautiyal, M.C.; Nautiyal, B.P.; Prakash, V. Effect of grazing and climatic changes on alpine vegetation of Tungnath, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Environmentalist 2004, 24, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tasser, E.; Tappeiner, U. Impact of land use changes on mountain vegetation. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2002, 5, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vess, J.D.; Messerli, B. The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling Development and Conservation; John Wiley and Sons: London, UK, 1989; pp. 582–583. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mittermeier, R.A.; Myers, N.; Thomsen, J.B.; da Fonseca, G.A.B.; Olivieri, S. Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: Approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12, 516–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Korner, C. Alpine Plant Life. Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1999; pp. 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  8. Melkania, N.P. Ecological panorama of rangelands in the Himalaya. In Proceedings of the Third International Rangeland Congress, New Delhi, India, 7–11 November 1988; pp. 47–48. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rawat, G.S.; Rodgers, W.A. The alpine meadows of Uttar Pradesh: An ecological review. In Rangeland Resources and Management; Singh, P., Pathak, P.S., Eds.; RMSI: Jhansi, India, 1988; pp. 119–137. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbon, A.; Silman, M.R.; Malhi, Y.; Fisher, J.B.; Meir, P.; Zimmermann, M.; Dargie, G.C.; Farfan, W.R.; Garcia, K.C. Ecosystem Carbon Storage Across the Grassland–Forest Transition in the High Andes of Manu National Park, Peru. Ecosystems 2010, 13, 1097–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lemaire, G.; Wilkins, R.; Hodgson, J. Challenges for grassland science: Managing research priorities. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 108, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pornaro, C.; Schneider, M.K.; Leinauer, B.; Macolino, S. Above-and belowground patterns in a subalpine grassland-shrub mosaic. Plant Biosyst. 2017, 151, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. MacDonald, D.; Crabtree, J.R.; Wiesinger, G.; Dax, T.; Stamou, N.; Fleury, P.; Gutierrez Lazpita, J.; Gibon, A. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response. J. Environ. Manag. 2000, 59, 47–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pornaro, C.; Schneider, M.K.; Macolino, S. Plant species loss due to forest succession in Alpine pastures depends on site conditions and observation scale. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 161, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Allen, V.G.; Batello, C.; Berretta, E.J.; Hodgson, J.; Kothmann, M.; Li, X.; McIvo, J.; Milne, J.; Morris, C.; Peetersand, A.; et al. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass Forage Sci. 2011, 66, 2–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Koch, B.; Edwards, P.J.; Blanckenhorn, W.U.; Walter, T.; Hofer, G. Shrub encroachment affects the diversity of plants, butterflies, and grasshoppers on two Swiss subalpine pastures. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 2015, 47, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Halim, R.A.; Buxton, D.R.; Hattendorf, M.J.; Carlson, R.E. Water stress effects on alfalfa forage quality after adjustment for maturity differences. Agron. J. 1989, 81, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ziliotto, U.; Andrich, O.; Lasen, C.; Ramanzin, M. TrattiEssenziali Della Tipologia Veneta dei Pascoli di Monte e Dintorni; Accademia Italiana di Scienzeforestali: Venezia, Italy, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  19. Buxton, D.R.; Fales, S.L. Plant environment and quality. In Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization; Fahey, G.D., Jr., Ed.; American Societ of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1994; pp. 155–199. [Google Scholar]
  20. Venterink, H.O.; Wassen, M.; Belgers, J.D.M.; Verhoeven, J.T.A. Control of environmental variables on species density in fens and meadows: Importance of direct effects and effects through community biomass. J. Ecol. 2001, 89, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duranel, A.; Acreman, M.C.; Stratford, C.J.; Thompson, J.R.; Mould, D.J. Assessing the hydrological suitability of floodplains for species-rich meadow restoration: A case study of the Thames floodplain, UK. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tiessen, H.; Cuevas, E.; Chacon, P. The role of soil organic matter in sustaining soil fertility. Nat. Cell Biol. 1994, 371, 783–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fornara, D.A.; Tilman, D. Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation. J. Ecol. 2008, 96, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lange, M.; Eisenhauer, N.; Sierra, C.A.; Bessler, H.; Engels, C.; Griffiths, R.I.; Mellado-Vázquez, P.G.; Malik, A.A.; Roy, J.; Scheu, S.; et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fischer, C.; Tischer, J.; Roscher, C.; Eisenhauer, N.; Ravenek, J.; Gleixner, G.; Attinger, S.; Jensen, B.; de Kroon, H.; Mommer, L.; et al. Plant species diversity affects infiltration capacity in an experimental grassland through changes in soil properties. Plant Soil 2015, 397, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gianelle, D.; Romanzin, A.; Clementel, F.; Vescovo, L.; Bovolenta, S. Feeding management of dairy cattle affect grassland dynamics in an alpine pasture. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2018, 16, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miller, D.J. Herders of forty centuries: Nomads of Tibetan rangelands in western China. In People and Rangelands: Building the Future, Proceedings of the 6 International Rangel and Congress, Townsville, Australia; Eldridge, D., Freudenberger, D., Eds.; 1999; pp. 402–403. Available online: http://www.rangelandcongress.com/VI%20Proceedings/AAH-WELCOME.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2011).
  28. Oza, G.M. Potentials and problems of hill areas in relation to conservation of wildlife in India. Environ. Conserv. 1980, 7, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bhat, G.A. Analysis of Animal Community in Dachigam Pasturelands. Master’s Thesis, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Kashmir, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  30. Baker, B.B.; Moseley, R.K. Advancing treeline and retreating glaciers: Implications for conservation in Yunnan, China. Arc. Antar. Alp. Res. 2007, 2, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Baba, A.A.; Geelani, N.S.; Saleem, I.; Husain, M. Phytosociological status of the selected sites (Protected site) for assessing the effect of grazing in Kashmir Valley, India. J. Pharmac. Phytochem. 2017, 4, 388–393. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lu, X.; Kelsey, C.K.; Yan, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, X.; Cheng, G.; Neff, C.J. Effects of grazing on ecosystem structure and function of alpine grasslands in Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau: A synthesis. Ecosphere 2017, 1, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Malik, A.Y. Feed availability, requirements for animals and current pattern of utilization in Pakistan. In Non-Conventional Feed Resources and Fibrous Agricultural Residues, Strategies for Expanded Utilization; Devendra, C., Ed.; International Development Research Centre, Indian Council of Agricultural Research: Jodhpur, India, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  34. Misri, B. Improvement of Sub-Alpine and Alpine Himalayan Pastures; Research Centre, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, HPKV Campus: Palalumpur, India, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  35. Qureshi, R.A.; Ghufran, M.A.; Gilani, S.A.; Sultana, K.; Ashraf, M. Ethnobotanical studies of selected medicinal plants of Sudhan Gali and Ganga Chotti hills, district Bagh, Azad Kashmir. Pak. J. Bot. 2007, 39, 2275–2283. [Google Scholar]
  36. Roy, A.K.; Singh, J.P. Grasslands in India: Problems and perspectives for sustaining livestock and rural livelihoods. Trop. Grass. 2013, 1, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. McNaughton, S.J. Ecology of grazing ecosystem: The Serengeti. Ecol. Monog. 1985, 55, 259–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pringle, H.J.R.; Landsberg, J. Predicting the distribution of livestock grazing pressure in rangelands. Aust. Ecol. 2004, 29, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grime, J.P. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 1998, 86, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wiegand, T.; Snyman, H.A.; Kellner, K.; Paruelo, J.M. Do Grasslands Have a Memory: Modeling Phytomass Production of a Semiarid South African Grassland. Ecosystems 2004, 7, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hector, A. The effect of diversity on productivity: Detecting the role of species complementarity. Oikos 1998, 82, 597–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ganaie, M.M.; Reshi, Z.A. Species Diversity and Dominance Pattern in a Temperate Grassland of Kashmir Himalaya. J. Plant Sci. Res. 2021, 8, 2. [Google Scholar]
  43. Blake, G.R.; Hartge, K.H. Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1—Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed.; Klute, A., Ed.; Agronomy Monograph 9; American Society of Agronomy—Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1986; pp. 363–382. [Google Scholar]
  44. Peer, T.; Gruber, J.P.; Millingard, A.; Hussain, F. Phytosociology, structure and diversity of the steppes vegetation in the mountains of Northern Pakistan. Phtocoenologia 2007, 37, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jackson, M.L. Soil Chemical Analysis; Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1973; p. 498. [Google Scholar]
  46. Piper, C.S. Soil and Plant Analysis; Hans Publisher: Bombay, India, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  47. Walkley, A.J.; Black, C.A. An estimation of method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1963, 27, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  48. Subbiah, B.V.; Asija, G.L. A Rapid Procedure for the Estimation of Available Nitrogen in Soils. Curr. Sci. 1956, 25, 259–260. [Google Scholar]
  49. Olsen, S.R.; Cole, C.V.; Watanabe, F.S.; Dean, L.A. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with NaHCO3; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 1954; Volume 939, p. 19. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lindsay, W.L.; Norvell, W.A. Development of a DTPA soil test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1978, 42, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dad, M.J.; Khan, B.A. Floristic composition of alpine grassland in Bandipora, Kashmir. Grass. Sci. 2010, 56, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dhar, U.; Kachroo, P. Alpine flora of Kashmir Himalaya; Sci Pub: Jodhpur, India, 1984; pp. 1–280. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tiwari, S.C. Phenology and seasonality in temperate grasslands of Garhwal Himalayas. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 1980, 6, 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sundriyal, R.C.; Joshi, A.P.; Dhasmana, R. Phenology of high-altitude plants at Tungnath in Garhwal Himalaya. Trop. Ecol. 1987, 28, 289–299. [Google Scholar]
  55. Curtis, J.T.; Cottam, G. Plant Ecology Workbook. Laboratory, Field and Reference Manual; Burgess Pub. Co.: Sheffield, UK, 1956; p. 193. [Google Scholar]
  56. Singh, J.S. Net aboveground community productivity in the grassland at Varanasi. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Recent Advances in Tropical Ecology; Misra, R., Goppal, B., Eds.; International Society for Tropical Ecology: Varanasi, India, 1968; pp. 631–654. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bates, D.; Mächler, M.; Bolker, B.M.; Walker, S.C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Software 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.5-7. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  59. Hill, M.O. Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 1973, 54, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kindt, R.; Coe, R. Tree Diversity Analysis. A Manual and Software for Common Statistical Methods for Ecological and Biodiversity Studies; World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF): Nairobi, Kenya, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ahmad, R.; Khuroo, A.A.; Hamid, M.; Malik, A.H.; Rashid, I. Scale and season determine the magnitude of invasion impacts on plant communities. Flora-Morphol. Distrib. Func. Ecol. Plants 2019, 260, 151481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Legendre, P.; Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology; Elsevier Science BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  63. Baselga, A.; Orme, C.D.L. Betapart: An R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3, 808–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Baselga, A. The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. White, R.P.; Murray, S.; Rohweder, M. Pilot Analysis of Globale Ecosystems-Grassland Ecosystems. World Resources Institute. 2000, p. xi + 89. Available online: https://www.wri.org/research/pilot-analysis-global-ecosystems-grassland-ecosystems (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  66. Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R Package Version. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  67. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  68. Poschlod, P.; Baumann, A.; Karlik, P. Origin and Development of Grasslands in Central Europe. In Grasslands in Europe of High Nature Value; KNNV Publishing: Zeist, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ecosystem Services in the Alps: A Short Report. 2018. Available online: https://www.alpine-space.eu/projects/alpes/downloads/alpes_report-_web-view-to-download-.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  70. EgarterVigl, L.; Schirpke, U.; Tasser, E.; Tappeiner, U. Linking long-term landscape dynamics to the multiple interactions among ecosystem services in the European Alps. Landsc. Ecol. 2016, 31, 1903–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wesmeier, M.; Hübner, R.; Barthold, F.; Spörlein, P.; Geuß, U.; Hangen, E.; Reischl, A.; Schilling, B.; von Lützow, M.; Kögel-Knabner, I.; et al. Amount, distribution and driving factors of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in cropland and grassland soils of southeast Germany (Bavaria). Agri. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 176, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Burgi, M.; Silbernagel, J.; Wu, J.; Kienast, F. Linking ecosystem services with landscape history. Landsc. Ecol. 2015, 30, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ma, M.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, N. Soil nutrient and vegetative diversity patterns of Alpine wetlands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cao, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Niu, B.; He, Y. Comparison of Methods for Evaluating the Forage-Livestock Balance of Alpine Grasslands on the Northern Tibetan Plateau. J. Resour. Ecol. 2020, 11, 272–282. [Google Scholar]
  75. Niu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Yang, S.; Ma, S.; Zhou, J.; Chu, B.; Hua, R.; Hua, L. Overgrazing Leads to Soil Cracking That Later Triggers the Severe Degradation of Alpine Meadows on the Tibetan Plateau. Land Degrad. Dev. 2019, 30, 1243–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mikola, J.; Setala, H.; Virkajarvi, P.; Saarijarvi, K.; Ilmarinen, K.; Voigt, W.; Vestberg, M. Defoliation and Patchy Nutrient Return Drive Grazing Effects on Plant and Soil Properties in a Dairy Cow Pasture. Ecol. Monogr. 2009, 79, 221–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Yimer, F.; Ledi, S.; Abdelkadir, A. Soil property variations in relation to topographic aspect and vegetation community in the south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 232, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Oyonarte, C.; Aranda, V.; Durante, P. Soil surface properties in Mediterranean mountain ecosystems: Effects of environmental factors and implications of management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 254, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Roukos, C.; Papanikolaou, K.; Karalazos, A.; Chatzi-panagiotou, A.; Mountousis, I.; Mygdalia, A. Changes in nutritional quality of herbage botanical components on a mountain side grassland in North-West Greece. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 169, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Davidson, E.A.; Janssens, I.A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 2006, 440, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Brady, N.C.; Weil, R.R. The Nature and Properties of Soils; Prentice-Hall Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  82. Bhandari, Y.; Zhang, Y. Effect of altitutde and soil biomass and plant richness in grasslands of Tibet, China and ManangDistrictt, Nepal. Ecosphere 2019, 10, e02915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pepin, N.; Bradley, R.S.; Diaz, H.F.; Baraër, M.; Caceres, E.B.; Forsythe, N.; Fowler, H.; Greenwood, G.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Liu, X.; et al. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 424–430. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dorji, T.; Hopping, K.A.; Menga, F.; Wanga, S.; Jianga, L.; Kleine, J.A. Impacts of climate change on flowering phenology and production in alpine plants: The importance of end of flowering. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 2020, 291, 106795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ernakovich, J.G.; Hopping, K.A.; Berdanier, A.B.; Simpson, R.T.; Kachergis, E.J.; Steltzer, H.; Wallenstein, M.D. Predicted responses of arctic and alpine ecosystems to altered seasonality under climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 3256–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bjorkman, A.D.; Elmendorf, S.C.; Beamish, A.L.; Vellend, M.; Henry, G.H.R. Contrasting effects of warming and increased snowfall on Arctic tundra plant phenology over the past two decades. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 4651–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Yang, Y.; Hopping, K.A.; Wang, G.; Chen, J.; Peng, A.; Klein, J.A. Permafrost and drought regulate vulnerability of Tibetan Plateau grasslands to warming. Ecosphere 2018, 9, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hailu, H. Analysis of vegetation phytosociological characteristics and soil physico-chemical conditions in Harishin Rangelands of Eastern Ethiopia. Land 2017, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pilar, C.D.; Gabriel, M.M. Phenological pattern of fifteen Mediterranean phanaerophytes from Quercus ilex communities of NE-Spain. Plant Ecol. 1998, 139, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Menzel, A.; Sparks, T.H.; Estrella, N. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12, 1969–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Piao, S.; Fang, J.; Zhou, L.; Ciais, P.; Zhu, B. Variations in satellite-derived phenology in China’s temperate vegetation. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12, 672–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Veenendaal, E.M.; Ernst, W.H.O.; Modise, G.S. Effects of seasonal rainfall pattern on seedling emergence and establishment of grasses in a savanna in South-eastern Botswana. J. Arid Environ. 1996, 3, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Blionis, G.J.; Halley, J.M.; Vokou, D. Flowering phenology of Campanula on Mt Olympos, Greece. Ecography 2001, 24, 696–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Keller, F.; Korner, C. The role of photoperiodism in alpine plant development. Arc. Ant. Alp. Res. 2003, 35, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Abu-Asab, M.S.; Peterson, P.M.; Shetler, S.G.; Orli, S.S. Earlier plant flowering in spring as a response to global warming in the Washington, DC, area. Biodivers. Conserv. 2001, 10, 597–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kudernatsch, T.; Fischer, A.; Bernhardt-Romermann, M.; Abs, C. Short-term effects of temperature enhancement on growth and reproduction of alpine grassland species. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2008, 9, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Inouye, D.W. Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. Ecology 2008, 89, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Vashistha, R.K.; Rawat, N.; Chaturvedi, A.K.; Nautiyal, B.P.; Prasad, P.; Nautiyal, M.C. An exploration on the phenology of different growth forms of an alpine expanse of North-West Himalaya, India. N. Y. Sci. J. 2009, 2, 29–42. [Google Scholar]
  99. Parthasarathy, N.; Karthikeyan, R. Plant biodiversity inventory and conservation of two tropical dry evergreen forests of the Coromondal coast, South India. BiodiversConserv. 1997, 6, 1063–1083. [Google Scholar]
  100. Ge, X.J.; Zhang, L.B.; Yuan, Y.M.; Hao, G.; Chiang, T.Y. Strong genetic differentiation of the East-Himalayan Megacodonstylophorus (Gentianaceae) detected by inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR). Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14, 849–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Shaheen, H.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Qureshi, R.A.; Zhid-ullah. Indigenous plant resources and their utilization practices in village populations of Kashmir himalayas. Pak. J. Bot. 2012, 44, 739–745. [Google Scholar]
  102. Komac, B.; Domenech, M.; Fanlo, R. Effects of grazing on the plant species diversity and pasture quality in sub alpine grasslands in eastern Pyrenees. Andorra. J. Nat. Conserv. 2014, 22, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rutherford, R.C.; Powrie, L.W. Impact of heavy grazing on plant species richness: A comparison across rangeland biomes of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2013, 87, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Average monthly temperature (°C) and precipitation (mm) at three grassland sites during the study period. Data is taken from the Meteorological Department at Rambagh Srinagar, J&K, India.
Figure 1. Average monthly temperature (°C) and precipitation (mm) at three grassland sites during the study period. Data is taken from the Meteorological Department at Rambagh Srinagar, J&K, India.
Sustainability 14 00887 g001
Figure 2. Contribution of various plant families at the different study sites.
Figure 2. Contribution of various plant families at the different study sites.
Sustainability 14 00887 g002
Figure 3. Impact of altitude, temperature, and precipitation on life history traits (phenophases) of different plant species. (A: Absent).
Figure 3. Impact of altitude, temperature, and precipitation on life history traits (phenophases) of different plant species. (A: Absent).
Sustainability 14 00887 g003
Figure 4. Coefficient estimates (slopes) derived from generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to evaluate the best environmental determinants of different phenological stages.
Figure 4. Coefficient estimates (slopes) derived from generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to evaluate the best environmental determinants of different phenological stages.
Sustainability 14 00887 g004
Figure 5. Renyi diversity profiles for the three studied alpine sites. The dots show the values for plots corresponding to given values of scaling parameter (α) and the lines represent the median and extremes in the data set.
Figure 5. Renyi diversity profiles for the three studied alpine sites. The dots show the values for plots corresponding to given values of scaling parameter (α) and the lines represent the median and extremes in the data set.
Sustainability 14 00887 g005
Figure 6. Dissimilarities across the three studied alpine sites. (A)Partitioning of βsor (total dissimilarity—gray line) into βsim (turnover or species replacement component of beta diversity—dashed line) and βsne (nestedness or richness difference component of beta diversity—solid line) for the study sites and average clustering of(B) βsim and(C) βsne components of species dissimilarity among the studied sites.
Figure 6. Dissimilarities across the three studied alpine sites. (A)Partitioning of βsor (total dissimilarity—gray line) into βsim (turnover or species replacement component of beta diversity—dashed line) and βsne (nestedness or richness difference component of beta diversity—solid line) for the study sites and average clustering of(B) βsim and(C) βsne components of species dissimilarity among the studied sites.
Sustainability 14 00887 g006
Figure 7. Correlation chart between community indices (i.e., plant species richness, diversity, and evenness measures) and environmental variables (temperature, precipitation, and altitude). Statistical significance p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Correlation chart between community indices (i.e., plant species richness, diversity, and evenness measures) and environmental variables (temperature, precipitation, and altitude). Statistical significance p < 0.05.
Sustainability 14 00887 g007
Table 1. Soil pH, electroconductivity, nutrient analysis, and bulk density of soil at different alpine grasslands.
Table 1. Soil pH, electroconductivity, nutrient analysis, and bulk density of soil at different alpine grasslands.
Study AreapHEC
(dSm−1)
OC
(%)
N
(mg kg−1)
P
(mg kg−1)
K
(mg kg−1)
Zn
(mg kg−1)
Fe
(mg kg−1)
Cu
(mg kg−1)
Ca
(cmolckg−1)
BD
(Mgm3)
K6.59 ± 0.390.19 ± 0.041.45 ± 0.36192.51 ± 4.216.33 ± 0.9129.18 ± 6.20.80 ± 0.1819.9 ± 22.08 ± 0.167.49 ± 0.531.23 ± 0.9
P7.01 ± 0.430.21 ± 0.031.84 ± 0.29199.42 ± 6.119.75 ± 1.4139.62 ± 4.8 0.83 ± 0.2119.2 ± 1.91.98 ± 0.097.65 ± 0.441.29 ± 1.1
Y7.6 ± 0.66 0.18 ± 0.032.33 ± 0.31204.41 ± 6.622.31 ± 1.65142.67 ± 5.70 0.82 ± 0.1920.22 ± 2.32 ± 0.117.48 ± 0.491.34 ± 1
K: Kongwattan, P: Poshpathri, Y: Yousmarg, pH: Hydrogen ion concentration, EC: Electroconductivity, OC: Organic Carbon, N: Nitrogen, P: Phosphorus, K: Potassium, Zn: Zinc, Fe: Iron, Cu: Copper, Ca: Calcium, BD: Bulk Density.
Table 2. Floristic composition at different alpine grasslands of Kashmir Himalaya.
Table 2. Floristic composition at different alpine grasslands of Kashmir Himalaya.
Plant SpeciesFamilyYousmargPoshpathriKongwattan
Achillea millefolium L. 1753AsteraceaeAAP
Ajuga parviflora Benth 1830LamiaceaeAAP
Alchemilla trollii Rothm 1938RosaceaePAA
Arabis alpina Krock. exSteud. 1840BrassicaceaeAPA
Arenaria stricta Michx. 1803CaryophyllaceaeAPA
Astragalus propinquus Schischk. 1933FabaceaeAPA
Callianthemum pimpinelloides (D. Don) Hook f. Thomson 1855RanunculaceaeAAP
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. 1792BrassicaceaeAPA
Cardamine impatiens L. 1753BrassicaceaePAA
Cerastium brchypetalum Pers 1805CaryophyllaceaePAA
Cerastium cerastoides (L.) Britton 1894CaryophyllaceaePAA
Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop 1975AsteraceaeAAP
Cirsium falconeri (Hook.f.) PetrAsteraceaeAPA
Cirsium wallichii DC. 1838AsteraceaeAPA
Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist 1943AsteraceaeAAP
Corydalis diphylla Wall. 1824PapaveraceaeAPA
Corydalis scouleri Hook. 1829PapaveraceaeAPA
Crepis sancta (L.) Babc. 1941AsteraceaeAAP
Cynoglossum wallichii G. Don 1837BoraginaceaeAAP
Duchesnea indica (Andrews) Focke 1888RosaceaeAPA
Epilobium hirsutum L. 1753OnagraceaeAAP
Euphorbia wallichii Hook. F. 1887EuphorbiaceaeAAP
Fimbristylis dichotoma (L.) Vahl 1805CyperaceaeAAP
Fragaria nubicola (Hook F.) Lindl. ex Lacaita 1916RosaceaePAP
Fragaria virginiana Duchesne, Hist. Nat. Frais. 204. 1766.RosaceaeAPA
Gallium aparine L. 1753RubiaceaePAP
Gentiana carinata Griseb. 1839GentinaceaePAP
Geranium himalayense Klotzsch 1862GeraniaceaeAPA
Geum vernum (Raf.) Torr. and A. Gray 1840RosaceaePPA
Hypericum perforatum L. 1753HypericaceaeAPP
Impatiens brachycentra Kar and Kir. 1842BalsaminaceaePAA
Iris hookeriana R.C. Foster 1887IridaceaePPP
Ligulariaamplexicaulis DC. 1838AsteraceaeAAP
Mazus reptans N.E.Br. 1914MazaceaePPA
Myosotis stricta Link ex Roem and Schult 1819BoraginaceaeAAP
Nepeta cataria L. 1753LamiaceaeAAP
Oxalis acetosella L. 1753OxalidaceaeAPA
Oxalis corniculata L. 1753OxalidaceaeAPA
Plantago lanceolata L. 1753PlantaginaceaePPA
Plantago himalaica Pilg CPlantaginaceaeAAP
Plantago major L. 1753PlantaginaceaePPP
Plantago ovata Phil. 1895PlantaginaceaeAAP
Poa angustifolia L. 1753PoaceaePAA
Poa annua L. 1753PoaceaeAAP
Poa compressa L. 1753PoaceaePPP
Podophyllum hexandrum Royle 1834BerberidaceaeAAP
Polygonum alpinum All. 1173PolygonaceaePAP
Polygonum heterophyllum Lindm 1912PolygonaceaeAAP
Potentilla atrosanguinea Lodd., G. Lodd. and W. Lodd 1823RosaceaeAPA
Primula denticulata Wight 1853PrimulaceaeAPP
Ranunculus hirtellus Royle 1834RanunculaceaePPP
Rheum webbianum Royle 1839PolygonaceaeAPA
Rumex acetosa L. 1753PolygonaceaePAA
Rumex nepalensis Spreng. 1825PolygonaceaeAAP
Sambucus wightiana Wall. ex Wight and Arn. 1834AdoxaceaeAAP
Sibbaldia cuneata Hornem. ex Kuntze 1847RosaceaePPP
Taraxicum officinale F.H. Wigg. 1780AsteraceaePPP
Thlaspi cochleariforme DC. Syst. Nat. 1821BrassicaeaeAPA
Thymus linearis Benth. 1830LamiaceaeAAP
Thymus serphyllum L. 1753LamiaceaeAPA
Trifolium pratense L. 1753FabaceaeAAP
Trifolium repens L. 1753FabaceaePPP
Urtica dioica L. 1753UtricaceaePAA
Valeriana jatamansi L. 1753ValerianaceaeAPA
Veronica serpyllifolia L. 1753PlantaginaceaeAPP
Viola biflora L. 1753ViolaceaePAA
P: Present, A: Absent.
Table 3. Results of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) testing the effect of best performing environmental variables on different phenological stages. Numbers for variables show the z statistic of model significance. mR2 and cR2 indicate the fit of the models without (marginal) and with(conditional) random effect, respectively. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05.
Table 3. Results of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) testing the effect of best performing environmental variables on different phenological stages. Numbers for variables show the z statistic of model significance. mR2 and cR2 indicate the fit of the models without (marginal) and with(conditional) random effect, respectively. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05.
TemperaturePrecipitationElevationAICmR2cR2
Germination−0.93 ***0.60 ***−0.37 ***147.560.880.88
Vegetative growth-0.22 **-357.200.340.34
Flowering1.06 ***-0.47 *161.080.830.90
Fruiting1.42 ***-0.47 ***126.090.940.94
Seed maturation0.63 ***−0.27 **0.37 ***304.390.800.80
Senescence−0.23 *−1.03 ***0.33 *211.750.850.90
Table 4. Relative density, relative frequency, relative area, and IVI of the plant species.
Table 4. Relative density, relative frequency, relative area, and IVI of the plant species.
Plant SpeciesYousmargPoshpathriKongwattan
RDRFRAIVIRDRFRAIVIRDRFRAIVI
A. millefolium 1.403.500.385.29
A. parviflora 1.091.410.432.93
A. trollii1.813.180.965.95
A. alpina 0.502.260.092.86
A. stricta 0.711.910.072.69
A. propinquus 1.721.580.303.61
C. pimpinelloides 0.310.770.071.15
C. bursa-pastoris 1.191.090.042.33
C. impatiens1.131.250.172.55
C. brchypetalum4.082.660.387.12
C. cerastoides2.473.020.355.84
C. arvense 1.371.590.773.74
C. falconeri 0.970.891.072.94
C. wallichii 0.860.790.822.47
C. bonariensis 1.661.163.316.13
C. diphylla 2.602.390.195.20
C. scouleri 2.262.080.094.43
Crepis sancta 1.121.470.362.95
C. wallichii 2.422.104.529.05
D. indica 1.321.210.072.60
E. hirsutum 1.591.590.313.49
E. wallichi 1.401.210.523.14
F. dichotoma 0.620.890.041.56
F. nubicola6.307.480.5514.33 2.513.280.216.00
F. virginiana 4.243.910.348.50
G. aparine1.132.060.433.62 2.990.600.213.80
G. carinata2.372.700.335.4 3.931.550.225.71
G. himalayense 1.691.560.343.60
G. vernum0.992.420.093.52.302.1204.43
H. perforatum 3.703.410.727.842.510.810.253.58
I. brachycentra0.230.850.011.09
I. hookeriana0.761.902.745.40.841.772.805.420.781.292.104.17
L. amplexicaulis 0.611.140.061.81
M. reptans6.755.491.2813.521.630.970.212.810000
M. stricta 3.466.131.2810.88
N. cataria 1.131.050.052.23
Oxalis acetosella 5.855.380.6011.85
O. corniculata 0.890.820.041.76
P. lanceolata1.426.6633.7941.875.304.8828.939.08
P. himalaica 3.934.3511.0119.29
P. major7.316.4820.6834.472.186.4629.9038.553.636.1825.7735.59
P. ovata 0.690.999.3911.07
P. angustifolia16.739.082.1227.93 0000
P. annua0000 11.045.980.2117.23
P. compressa15.099.651.8826.628.407.731.2717.427.566.870.9115.35
P. hexandrum0000 0.490.980.752.22
P. alpinum1.622.850.204.67 1.571.130.092.80
P. heterophyllum 0.463.540.114.12
P. atrosanguinea 0.840.780.031.66
P. denticulata 5.875.411.2512.541.192.470.774.43
R. hirtellus2.283.710.086.074.323.980.078.391.733.650.826.20
R. webbianum 1.611.4924.8627.96
R. acetosa0.671.7421.4423.85
R. nepalensis 1.021.1818.8221.03
S. wigthiana 0.151.8410.5412.54
S. cuneata7.768.730.5917.088.217.560.1915.979.616.410.2116.23
T. officinale3.644.763.8312.232.772.552.908.232.824.604.3311.75
T. cochleariforme 3.343.070.306.71
T. linearis 0.120.470.160.76
T. serpyllum 0.470.430.221.12
T. pratense 9.138.400.8018.3311.646.721.0819.44
T. repens13.949.702.3225.968.507.831.2217.5611.037.380.5818.99
U. dioica0.631.695.617.93
V. jatamansi 3.983.660.418.06
V. serpyllifolia 1.631.500.203.330.153.110.273.53
V. biflora0.841.830.052.58 0.090.460.030.59
RD = Relative density, RF = Relative frequency, RA = Relative area, IVI = Importance value index.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wani, I.A.; Verma, S.; Gupta, R.; Ganaie, M.M.; Nigam, G.; Shafik, H.M.; Al-Misned, F.A. Nutrient Analysis and Species Diversity of Alpine Grasslands: A Comparative Analysis of Less Studied Biodiversity Hotspots. Sustainability 2022, 14, 887. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14020887

AMA Style

Wani IA, Verma S, Gupta R, Ganaie MM, Nigam G, Shafik HM, Al-Misned FA. Nutrient Analysis and Species Diversity of Alpine Grasslands: A Comparative Analysis of Less Studied Biodiversity Hotspots. Sustainability. 2022; 14(2):887. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14020887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wani, Ishfaq Ahmad, Susheel Verma, Renu Gupta, Masood Majaz Ganaie, Gaurav Nigam, Hesham M. Shafik, and Fahad A. Al-Misned. 2022. "Nutrient Analysis and Species Diversity of Alpine Grasslands: A Comparative Analysis of Less Studied Biodiversity Hotspots" Sustainability 14, no. 2: 887. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14020887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop