Next Article in Journal
Hybrid Data-Driven Models for Hydrological Simulation and Projection on the Catchment Scale
Previous Article in Journal
Big Data Applications in Food Supply Chain Management: A Conceptual Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review on Global Emissions by E-Products Based Waste: Technical Management for Reduced Effects and Achieving Sustainable Development Goals

1
Electrical and Electronic Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Saba, Malaysia
2
School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
3
Power Electronics and Renewable Energy Research Laboratory (PEARL), Department of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Selangor, Malaysia
4
Center of Research Excellence in Renewable Energy and Power Systems, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Industrial Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Ibaraki College, 866 Nakane, Hitachinaka City 312-8508, Ibaraki, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(7), 4036; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074036
Submission received: 14 February 2022 / Revised: 25 February 2022 / Accepted: 28 February 2022 / Published: 29 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Waste and Recycling)

Abstract

:
In the 21st century, a great amount of electrical and electronic waste (e-waste) has accumulated, and the unregulated nature of its disposal and recycling represents a particular hazard in a global context. For the purposes of e-waste management, there must be more emphasis on the scientific processes for recycling, reusing and remanufacturing precious materials. Resource management is related to energy management; therefore, the harvesting of costly materials from e-waste is important for both energy management and sustainable development. At present, a lack of scientific recycling of a significant amount of e-waste is a source of environmental pollution and health hazards that are having a detrimental effect on sustainable development goals. It is necessary to find a process for recovering valuable materials from e-waste with the minimum possible environmental impact. At present, it is essential to modify the process of electrical and electronic products (e-products) becoming e-waste, and the subsequent process of e-waste recycling, in order to lessen the impact in terms of pollution. E-waste scientific recycling initiatives can reduce the environmental impact of the process, which in turn can support a shift from the current linear flow of costly materials to a more sustainable circular flow. Furthermore, internal consumption loss, emissions, and heating loss from e-products are the main factors contributing to the loss of energy efficiency in the process, which in turn contributes to environmental pollution. Promoting green innovation in the manufacturing process of e-products, as well as their reuse, can reduce the environmental impact of e-waste in near future. Both of these pathways are imperative for a less polluted, low-toxic environment and sustainable development. However, the sustainable development initiative of the United Nation Environmental Programme (UNEP) policy framework is the ultimate goal. This is expected to support the management of environmental pollution, maintaining it at an acceptable level, while also preventing hazardous risks to human health. Hence, this review examines the prospects for achievable environmental sustainability through technological developments.

1. Introduction

Environmental pollution is a critical problem in the 21st century. A reduction in emission-related pollution will lead to cleaner energy transition, waste management, and technological energy efficiency; therefore, it is vital to make progress in reducing emission-related pollution [1]. The sustainable development goals (SDG) for waste management are associated with environmental emission management and public health hazards, and environmentally sound energy technologies can limit emissions and environmental pollution. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), electricity contributes to nearly 40% of total global energy consumption and emissions. In addition to fuel, the generation of electricity and load-associated electrical and electronic technologies have a vital influence on environmental pollution. The goal of emission reduction to reduce the use of primary non-renewable energy is vital. A type of energy that can be used for electricity generation, and associated electrical technologies, is desired in order to reduce the carbon footprint for related processes. As per the British Petroleum Statistical Review of World Energy 2021, the total electricity generation from all recorded sources in 2019 was 27,001 TWh [2]. According to a study (Figure 1), 758.00 (2.83%), 6268.1 (23.37%), 9421.4 (35.12%), 2700.1 (10.07%), 4296.8 (16.02%), 1591.2 (5.93%), 855.70 (3.19%), 700.10 (2.61%) and 231.80 (0.86%) TWh are generated from oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, hydropower, windmills, solar, geothermal, biomass and other sources, respectively [2].
Most recent data demonstrated that 16,447.5 TWh (or roughly 61.32%) of the total electricity is generated from fossil fuels, whereas 27.75% of the total electricity is generated from renewable (hydropower, wind, solar, geothermal, etc.) sources. Therefore, huge technological changes are currently in progress in terms of electricity generation from non-renewable to renewable.
The modern concepts of a low-carbon society and environmental protection cannot be materialized only from a reduction in primary non-renewable energy resources. Energy use in engineering processes and resource use in economy are analogous. Central to both of these are the policies of energy efficiency and circular economy in order to reduce resource usage and promote sustainable process management. Emission generation is a multidimensional approach in which a reduction in the use of resources is disputable [3]. Cumulative electrical and electronic waste (e-waste) related to consumer electronics, energy supply, security, entertainment, and huge IT products are now common environmental hazards [4]. Besides these areas, e-waste is also a significant challenge in healthcare, security, and energy harvesting. The emission effect of e-waste in material recycling processes is significant. It has an immense environmental impact and a significant effect on human health, as mentioned in the SDGs [5]. There is a comprehensive approach in which electrical technologies and consumer electronics associated with huge amounts of e-waste are key burdens for resource management and environmental emission. By reducing pollution and improving resource efficiency, SDGs can be achieved. In the process of conceiving of a new development program for the 21st century, huge energy generation and usage pathways for electrical and electronic product (e-products) and their energy management are crucial in order to limit environmental emissions. This is exclusively dependent on technological innovations. In this framework, sources to load site energy management are a reality. Demand for consumer electronics in the service and industrial sectors account for huge energy consumption, which is another root cause of environmental emissions. Energy and resource management are the key targets of the SDGs in order to prevent environmental and health hazards [6]. Therefore, this study focuses primarily on environmental and health issues related to e-waste, pathways to mitigating the environmental and health-related impacts of e-waste, and the scientific process of resource management and environment protection. Finally, key technological developments and innovation pathways in several environmentally sound and energy-efficient electrical technologies are reported. Both are explicitly significant under new development goals and SDGs in the 21st century.

The Current Status of E-Waste from E-Products

Social awareness of electrical and electronic product (e-product) reuse, recycling, and innovation can help to reduce e-waste. Until 2016, 44.7 million tons of e-waste had been produced in the world, equivalent to 6.1 kg per person. In 2018, about 52 million tons of e-waste or 6.8 kg/capita were produced worldwide, with a 7% annual increase [4]; China produced 15.5 million tons or about one-third of the total mass of e-waste. The management, usage, and business of recovering materials from e-waste have modest correlations to industrial and environmental development [7]. The current trend of e-products and e-waste accumulation is shown in Figure 2; accordingly, 75 and 111 million tons of e-waste will be accumulated by 2030 and 2050, respectively.
Currently, increasing e-waste is a significant problem for society and the environment. In a circular economy model, e-waste materials are reused in a circular rather than a linear flow. In a linear model, for example, the extraction of minerals from ore requires several complex procedures and energy use, and then the minerals are finally used in a device. On the contrary, if a circular model is applied, the possibility of costly resource (e-resource) recycling is a major advantage for e-products. E-waste has become one of the sources of environmental emissions and entropy due to gaps in processing and recycling policies. Furthermore, scientific methods for recovering valuable materials from e-waste are essential for manufacturing new e-products with the lowest primary resource usage and environmental emissions [8,9,10,11,12]. In this regard, decreased material extraction and ore processing could have massive environmental benefits. Models for the production and usage of e-products are specifically related to ultimate e-waste production. Thus, in this study, we focus on the following two main aspects:
  • Presently, effective and scientific management of e-waste resource recycling can lessen environmental toxicity and emissions.
  • In the near future, a demand-side innovation pathway of increasingly diverse electrical energy efficiency technologies can reduce emission impact.
Scientific e-waste recycling processes are essential for both environmental protection and e-resource recovery. Moreover, emissions can be reduced by developing energy efficiency technologies, as shown in Figure 3. Initially, a circular flow model of e-waste material management is associated with emission and entropy effects, and therefore, the primary focus is the extent of the gap between scientific processes and management. A relative statistical entropy (RSE) analysis has been conducted to comprehensively assess the physical flow of materials and end products after processing [13]. Furthermore, currently, an RSE analysis has been conducted on the most significant energy storage technology, i.e., lithium (Li)-ion battery waste management [14]. These studies both revealed that increased recovery of valuable materials during the recycling process had a significant impact, creating a higher entropic state due to toxic effects and environmental impacts. Resource recovery is one choice, whereas the toxic effects of heavy metals and hazardous polymers are common dangers for human health and environment [4,14]. Due to toxins and emission exposure during informal recycling, it is essential to develop scientific recycling processes. Scientific recycling of e-waste is an environmental protection issue associated with technology; therefore, e-waste and e-product technological developments are key to realize environmental protection in the electricity sector [15,16,17].

2. E-Waste and the Concept of Technology Shift

At present, e-waste is one of the fastest growing solid waste streams from electrical and electronic products, due to changes in entertainment products as well as significant changes in technology. Currently, its emerging environmental impact is under full consideration by the Global E-waste Monitor for the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP). E-products and their e-waste are positively related to the economic development and ever-changing technologies in countries [18,19]. After World War II, massive and rapid development of technological innovations in developed countries led to increased production of e-products; however, the rate of e-waste generation was much lower. At the beginning of the 21st century, there were significant increases in IT innovations related to the development and replacement of electronic and electrical systems and, currently, IT innovations have been growing quickly. IT innovation in this field can be a source for materials to flow under a circular economic model when effective scientific methods are used for the extraction of precious materials [20,21,22]. Furthermore, the flow of e-waste from developed to developing nations at the end stage of the recycling process has been associated with substantial environmental and health effects [23,24]. The current e-waste of most developed countries is >15 kg/capita, whereas, for rapidly developing countries, the growth rate is still below the world average of 6.2 kg/capita [4]. Unregulated flow and poor environmental regulations have made the flow of solid waste to developing nations easier. Due to huge populations and rapid development, the rates of e-waste accumulation in both India and China are the highest. They are suffering from entrenched informal e-waste processing [25]. The latest review of studies that covered 174 countries in the world showed that e-waste production per capita was positively correlated to the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, but there was less of a relationship between population and e-waste generation [26]. In the context of generating e-waste, especially in the USA and the EU, significant e-waste production is a reality; however, strict environmental regulations maintain an inverted U pattern in developed countries. However, both unregulated flow and processing of e-waste in populated developing and the least developed countries are key concerns. Toxic contents, heavy metals, and hazardous polymers during processing and recycling are common dangers for environmental pollution and human health hazards. Materials in e-waste are disposed of in open land, rather than being properly extracted for reuse and recycling, and therefore, environmental and health risks are growing [27]. Fluorinated greenhouse gases used in liquid crystal display (LCD) flat panel production involve chemicals with atmospheric lifetimes beyond 3000 years and thousands of times more global warming potential than CO2 [28]. Because of toxic heavy metals from e-waste in landfills, the resulting eventual environmental contamination is obvious [29,30]. Chips and semiconductor manufacturing use a variety of chemicals including volatile organic compounds, and several rudimentary e-waste recycling practices can lead to serious health hazards, as well as air, water, and soil pollution [31,32]. Recently, environmental consequences of e-waste have been subjects of global debate. At the policy level, solutions to the e-waste problem should include more attention to e-waste management at macroscopic and microscopic scales to avoid toxic substances entering into downstream sites [33,34]. Due to the rules in developed countries, several developing countries in Asia and Africa are under a significant threat due to e-waste recycling processes. Because of policy gaps in the informal processing and recycling practices of developing countries, management solutions are critical to solve the problems [35,36]. Recently, circular economy and recycling process risk assessments for both health and environmental hazard analyses have been reported [37,38]. To regain materials from waste, the environmental effect must be considered. In addition to a zero-emission energy policy by IEA, an e-waste proactive policy by UNEP is central [7]. E-waste ecological contaminations and health hazard prevention measures are essential because environmental and health threats are the main impediments to reach the SDGs. Table 1 summarizes the link between the SDGs and e-waste management. There is an urgent need to increase actions to reduce pollution, to improve resource efficiency, and to better protect the environment and, therefore, to achieve the SDGs and to ensure the sustainability of the planet. All these actions are related to environmental emission reduction and public health management that can be partly achieved by innovations in solid e-waste and energy technologies.
Regarding e-waste recycling under the SDGs, the following limitations are notable. In both developed and developing countries, international agencies and social awareness are very important to solve this problem [24]. However, in addition to waste management for emission and toxic effect prevention, load side emission-related technology gap analyses, fewer emissive e-products, and reductions in load consumption pathways are essential. In this context, lowering the net environmental impact through a sustainable e-product development model is important. Figure 4 shows the pathways for both e-product innovation and e-waste processing. In this process, e-waste processing regulations and a circular flow of costly materials support the production chain. The scientific pathways of reusing, remanufacturing, and improving energy efficiency, along with the scientific recycling of valuable materials create a circular flow for e-products.

3. E-Product Technological Management

Although a net-zero carbon policy is the target, achieving this goal with high exergy in energy resources for electricity and e-products is imperative. Recently, expanding the development of renewable energy in the utility sectors is the key initiative for a sustainable electricity supply. Reducing energy demand and protecting the environment by using green energy resources are important under the IEA framework for a low-carbon society. The present significance of energy and related environmental problems has created an urgent need for scientific research on efficient energy systems and related technical solutions such as green initiatives. Previously, exergy efficiencies of diverse electrical technologies were analyzed by M.A. Rosen and C.A. Bulucea [40], including generators, motors, transformers, diverse renewable energy technologies, storage batteries, fuel cells, urban electric transports, and lighting devices. Exergy loss in most technologies is associated with internal consumption loss, emissions, and heat loss. Regarding electrical loads, especially, electrical consumption of lighting devices is significant, and therefore, lighting devices have the lowest energy and exergy efficiencies. Furthermore, regarding motors, generators, transformers, and alternators, the leading losses that reduce both exergy and energy efficiencies are magnetic circuit eddy loss, torque-related loss, and overall heat loss. Electronic display devices, in addition to lighting devices, have similar loss effects. Advancements in solid-state lighting and LCD display have effectively improved the energy efficiency of display and lighting systems [41]. Under the IEA’s net-zero policy (NZP), huge renewable energy resources, especially the efficiency of PV solar and wind-based energy and exergy promotion, are vastly important. PV exergy loss is mostly thermal loss in the module surface [42]:
E x t h e r m a l   = E x e l e c t r i c a l E x o u t p u t
Exthermal is due to internal dissipation of heat or consumption and emission loss. However, electrical voltage loss is also involved with the thermal effect, because once ambient temperature is high, it may cause higher electrical energy loss due to electrical dissipation. Extensive research is underway to solve these issues. In addition to PV solar energy, the second most significant renewable source to materialize the IEA’s NZP is wind-based energy. The exergy loss of a wind-based system depends on air pressure, flow rate, humidity, and temperature. These factors are marked as variations of effective work (we) and useful work (wu) as follows:
E x l o s s = w u w e
Unlike thermal loss in PV solar energy, the losses in wind-based systems are mostly affected by environmental parameters [43]. The core loss of a wind-based system for converting mechanical energy to electrical energy is similar to the internal loss such as in other magnetic circuit systems. Solar PV exergy destruction/loss is mostly due to temperature, whereas wind-based exergy destruction/loss is affected by wind speed and humidity [44].
Although the abovementioned research explained the losses, there have been limited developments to reduce these losses [40,41,42,43,44]. Table 2 shows the electricity related energy and exergy efficiencies, and specific future prospects. In addition to renewable technologies, the latest advancements in other electrical technologies and future technology prospects are also presented in the table.
In addition to the technological advancements in household energy use systems, rapid changes have occurred by replacing other energy resources with electricity as a low emissive energy supply. The energy use systems in the building and transport sectors are also changing, which are shown in Table 3.
In addition to shifting electricity primary resources to renewables, a reduction in e-product exergy destruction/loss and greater energy efficiency are also advised. Electricity-related emissions are associated with environmental effects that are having a leading impact on increased global temperatures. Regarding energy efficiency, a fundamental change in energy demand is very important for mitigating emissions [91,92,93]. The roadmap to renewable energy involves a shift from massive non-renewable to renewable resources. New technologies [94] and policy shifts [95] toward decarbonization under the IEA policy framework are central. Numerous technologies related to energy sources, power electronics, and consumer electronics, as mentioned in Table 2 and Table 3, are potential innovations for increasing energy and exergy efficiencies. The most significant electrical loads at the utility level are motors, generators, drives, transformers, blasts, and lighting bulbs, and therefore, they have the greatest potential for increasing energy efficiency [96,97]. Enthalpy for e-products in manufacturing industries and newly familiarized IT sectors, associated hardware, large scale data servers, and data link energy consumption could be increased progressively. A huge technology shift, with an increase in electrical technologies and power electronics related new energy generation is expected to lessen carbon intensity and global warming [98,99]. From the above tables, it can be seen that, at the utility level, mostly, the design of electrical technological innovation based on power electronics and baseline energy resource networks has immense scope for further development.

Energy Management Paradigm Shift

Energy and its efficiency are the main drivers of daily life functionalities and development. The potential significance of energy and environmental problem reduction has resulted in new scientific research on efficient energy systems, storage, and related technical solutions such as green initiatives as a new dimension. In the new era of ample energy generation by green energy networks, energy management is crucial [100,101]. Therefore, smart meters, data networks, sensors, and micro-grid systems with information communications technology (ICT) networks are well-established ideas for energy savings. For this purpose, the management of data networks from source to load sites using sensor systems, modulation techniques, and antenna subsystem set-up is essential [102]. In addition, healthcare, security, energy harvesting, and environmental effect management purpose data and sensory system networks with servers for data storage and management have huge potential in the near future. Energy intake in the ICT arena as data transfer networks in line with the advancement of communication networks is rapidly expanding. Energy-efficient systems are not only necessary for daily normal life but also in hazardous and emergency situations, in which they are essential to technological support [103]. Technological advancements in nano devices have resulted in robust systems for computer data management and storage. Big data traffic, device-to-device uninterrupted connectivity purposes, energy-efficient sensory networks with advanced communication modules, and renewable energy-supported green energy backbone are vital [104]. Thus, a green energy subsystem, as well as its storage and implementation in content delivery and technical management as green network support are forthcoming. In this perspective, green energy and smart technologies for achieving sustainable energy management networks are essential.
The bulk energy demand and environmental protection aims of massive green energy inclusion to meet a low carbon society by 2030 and to finally reach the 2050 target is an energetic work plan of world communities [105,106]. The generation of small-scale and diverse green energy and its management by a smart network at both the source and load end have the potential for improving energy efficiency. The shared efforts of material scientists, energy engineers, as well as network and communication engineers can make it successful. For this purpose, energy generation by renewable resources such as solar photovoltaic, thermoelectric, or other electro-mechanical system inclusion is advised. Robust renewable energy management energy storage, a renewable energy system inverting process, electric vehicles, and speed control of motors, generators, and air conditioning systems have a lot of potential in power electronics by reducing load consumption and the advancement of materials technology will increase electric load efficiency [107]. As a result, it is even possible for low energy generation to support the extra load for increased population demands [108]. In addition to the extra e-product requirements for additional usages due to ever-changing lifestyles and overpopulation, scientific e-waste processing and management can contribute to a circular flow of precious materials in the e-production chain [109,110]. Recycling systems can reduce the entropic effect of ore processing, improving the production of e-products. As a result, an eco-friendlier world could be anticipated. Energy and exergy efficiencies and remodeling of devices can reduce emissions.

4. Remanufacturing Model: Resource and E-Waste Management

End-of-life (EOL) product remanufacturability is a new concept that has emerged in the 21st century. The gap between bulk demand and resources is the main driver of the EOL product concept. It is also associated with environmentally friendly resource management with longevity and device performance [111]. There is substantial potential for reusing materials; however, e-waste from e-products in landfills pollutes the environment. Gap analyses of management and energy-efficient technologies are key solutions to overcome these shortcomings. As previously mentioned, the design and remodeling of e-products can be effective for reusing them, while scientific recycling of precious metals from e-waste can reduce the use of new raw resources. However, advanced EOL product models are focusing on the lowest production of e-waste. The circular schemes are important, especially for economic and environmental performances; both impacts are considered to be vital to the development of a sustainable society. Reuse models for resource management and the production of primary sources from raw materials are associated with huge emission issues. To overcome difficulties throughout the processes for effective e-product reuse and e-waste recycling, policy development is essential to lessen the emission gap between reuse and recycling [112], and therefore, result in an effective overall reuse and recycling model with respect to ecological and economical features. The energy saving and emission reduction model for both economic and environmental matters has been well reported. Furthermore, clean energy saving and emission reduction models for energy efficiency, carbon footprint reduction approaches, and waste management have been broadly quantified [113]. Technical analyses of exergy and energy efficiencies are essential to further harmonize the entire process to the lowest emission production cycle.
The industrial development purposes of key technological innovation pathways for several electrical technologies are reported in Table 2 and Table 3. In Table 2, the prospects of electrical power generation, conversion, and storage systems are presented. In Table 3, different residential loads and industrial sector and process prospects are summarized. In Table 2, the energy and exergy efficiencies of PV panels made of nanoparticles or concentrated PV cells are listed. Instead of using a PV system alone, a hybrid combination of PV/hydro/wind/biomass/energy storage would be a good option to enhance overall efficiency. By using a mirror dish concentrator, the efficiency of a solar PV thermal system can be improved. The use of advanced power cycles, a reheat process, and inlets with supercritical steam systems can improve the efficiency of a solar tower system. A hybrid solar dryer and air drying system can further improve the efficiency of a solar drying system without relying only on solar power. By using the latest technologies, the efficiency of electrical conversion equipment can also be improved. For instance, solid-state transformers, electric turbo alternators, permanent magnet synchronous generators/motors, and modern power electronic converters can enhance the efficiency of electrical conversion systems. The future direction of fossil-fuel-based power plants is that they should be replaced by distributed generation of renewable energy sources. By using small modular reactors, the efficiency of nuclear power plants can be boosted. Hybrid combinations of hydro and wind power generation with other renewable energy-based power generation systems can improve their efficiencies. In addition, bladeless wind turbines can improve the efficiency of a wind turbine system. In the future, it is recommended that combined generation systems use CHP-based co-generation systems and RE-based trigeneration systems for improving energy and exergy efficiencies. By enhancing the efficiency of transportation systems, pollution can be reduced. The future direction is to use hybrid RE and energy storage systems to power transportation. An integrated gasification fuel cell (IGFC) process based on coal/fuel cell/biomass can help to improve the efficiency of coal gasification systems. To improve the efficiency of battery and fuel cell energy storage systems, the future direction is to use solid-state batteries and reversible fuel cells. The efficiency of existing solar air heaters can be increased by using an obstacle-type solar air heater and porous baffles inserted into the solar air heater. To enhance the efficiency of PVT collectors, water-based PVT collectors integrated with sheet-and-tube channels can be used. Smart microgrid or nanogrid technologies can be adopted to enhance the performance of hybrid energy systems.
In the residential sector, among the many appliances that are used, lighting is the most used appliance which has the lowest efficiency, as shown in Table 3. To enhance the efficiency of lighting (incandescent and fluorescent), carbon-dot LEDs should be used. For refrigeration and air conditioning systems, inverter-based systems are preferred to enhance efficiency. To enhance the efficiency of water pumps, a hybrid system powered by a smart brushless or permanent magnet synchronous motor can be used. Smart, emission-free, direct-fired, tunnel electric ovens can be used to enhance the efficiency of conventional electric ovens. In addition, solid-state microwave ovens can improve the efficiency of conventional microwave ovens. By using an AMD processor, desktop PC efficiency can be enhanced. Wireless mobile chargers can be used to enhance the efficiency of plug-in mobile chargers. Tankless and on-demand water heaters, heat pump water heaters, and solar water heaters can be used to replace conventional water heaters to improve efficiency. There are other home appliances, such as TVs, water coolers, kettles, blenders, toasters, and irons, listed in Table 3, with the suggested technological innovations that can improve the efficiencies of all these appliances. For industrial processes, energy and exergy efficiencies can be improved by using energy-efficient systems. For example, the processes which use high-pressure steam boilers can be replaced with modular steam boilers to improve efficiency. An induction heater instead of a conventional heater can be used to improve efficiency. For the industrial sectors, such as petroleum refining, iron steel, chemical/petrochemicals, petrochemical feedstock, fertilizer, cement, sugar, and non-iron metal manufacturing, the conventional induction motors can be replaced by permanent magnet synchronous motors to enhance the energy and exergy efficiencies.

5. Conclusions and Future Developments

From the perspective of global emissions and environmental pollution, the importance of e-waste scientific recycling, e-product energy, and remanufacturing management pathways are illustrated. Low emissions and a wide range of green technology developments in all sectors of electricity are the main drivers to implement SDG policy. Regarding e-waste recycling, under the UNEP resource management agenda for SDG, there are some limitations. Through the SDG policy framework, the results of management gap analyses show that proper management of e-waste and energy efficiency technological innovations are future solutions to overcome the cumulative environmental effects. Electrical technology (e-product) innovation pathways for improving exergy and energy efficiencies are considered to be vital. Thus, we presented a detailed analysis on the prospects of different electrical and electronic loads for improving exergy and energy efficiencies to limit environmental emissions. The flow of e-waste and scientific management of e-waste are both expected to extend eco-system management and human health hazard protection in the future. Moreover, in addition to renewable energy, bio-energy inclusion for electricity generation can limit environmental emissions.
A sustainable development system integrated with e-waste management can play a vital role in meeting the global SDGs for 2030, such as reduced health complications and deaths due to exposure to the toxic and hazardous composition of e-waste surrounding environments; reduced environmental threats from air pollution due to open burning, water pollution due to acid and chemical leaching, and soil pollution due to toxic effluent and discharge of residues; secure and safe working environments, particularly for children and women.
Furthermore, SDGs such as good health and well-being, employment opportunities, economic growth, and sustainable cities and communities can also be met through the transformation of informal players into micro-entrepreneurs. To inform workers about the consequences of e-waste, effective awareness campaigns are necessary. For a successful e-waste management system, a sustainable roadmap can be adapted to create sustainable and resilient environments, to bridge existing gaps between the informal and formal recycling sectors, to expand business and job opportunities, and to improve occupational health and safety.

Authors Contribution

Conceptualization, S.A. and B.K.G.; investigation, S.A.; B.K.G. and S.K.G.; Manuscript Writing, S.A.; S.M.; B.K.G. and S.K.G.; Manuscript Review and Editing, S.A.; S.M.; B.K.G. and S.K.G.; Supervision, S.M. and B.K.G.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the University Malaysia Sabah (UMS) for providing the financial support under research grant No. SDK 0311-2020.This work is under UMS open access priority publication program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this research is enclosed within the manuscript. No external data sources are used in this research.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University Malaysia Sabah for providing the financial support under research grant No. SDK 0311-2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nižetić, S.; Djilali, N.; Papadopoulos, A.; Rodrigues, J.J. Smart technologies for promotion of energy efficiency, utilization of sustainable resources and waste management. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 565–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. British Petroleum. Statistical Review of World Energy. Available online: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html (accessed on 25 November 2021).
  3. Hickel, J.; Kallis, G. Is Green Growth Possible? New Politi. Econ. 2019, 25, 469–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ilankoon, I.; Ghorbani, Y.; Chong, M.N.; Herath, G.; Moyo, T.; Petersen, J. E-waste in the international context—A review of trade flows, regulations, hazards, waste management strategies and technologies for value recovery. Waste Manag. 2018, 82, 258–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Available online: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Climate-Change/Documents/GEM%202017/Global-E-waste%20Monitor%202017%20-%20Chapter%202.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  6. Rodić, L.; Wilson, D.C. Resolving Governance Issues to Achieve Priority Sustainable Development Goals Related to Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries. Sustainability 2017, 9, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Future E-waste scenarios. Available online: https://ulir.ul.ie/handle/10344/8262 (accessed on 16 October 2021).
  8. Marinello, S.; Gamberini, R. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches Applied to Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): A Comprehensive Literature Review. Toxics 2021, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shittu, O.S.; Williams, I.D.; Shaw, P.J. Global E-waste management: Can WEEE make a difference? A review of e-waste trends, legislation, contemporary issues and future challenges. Waste Manag. 2020, 120, 549–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ismail, H.; Hanafiah, M.M. A review of sustainable e-waste generation and management: Present and future perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 264, 110495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yong, Y.S.; Lim, Y.A.; Ilankoon, I. An analysis of electronic waste management strategies and recycling operations in Malaysia: Challenges and future prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 224, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arya, S.; Kumar, S. E-waste in India at a glance: Current trends, regulations, challenges and management strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 271, 122707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rechberger, H.; Brunner, P.H. A New, Entropy Based Method To Support Waste and Resource Management Decisions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 36, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Martínez, O.V.; Van Den Boogaart, K.G.; Lundström, M.; Santasalo-Aarnio, A.; Reuter, M.; Serna-Guerrero, R. Statistical entropy analysis as tool for circular economy: Proof of concept by optimizing a lithium-ion battery waste sieving system. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 212, 1568–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Awasthi, A.K.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Awasthi, M.K.; Li, J. E-waste management in India: A mini-review. Waste Manag. Res. J. Sustain. Circ. Econ. 2018, 36, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Misra, N.R.; Kumar, S.; Jain, A. A Review on E-waste: Fostering the Need for Green Electronics. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS), Noida, India, 19–21 February; 2021; pp. 1032–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rautela, R.; Arya, S.; Vishwakarma, S.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.-H.; Kumar, S. E-waste management and its effects on the environment and human health. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 773, 145623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Awasthi, A.K.; Cucchiella, F.; D’Adamo, I.; Li, J.; Rosa, P.; Terzi, S.; Wei, G.; Zeng, X. Modelling the correlations of e-waste quantity with economic increase. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 613–614, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kusch, S.; Hills, C.D. The Link between e-Waste and GDP—New Insights from Data from the Pan-European Region. Resources 2017, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahirwar, R.; Tripathi, A.K. E-waste management: A review of recycling process, environmental and occupational health hazards, and potential solutions. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2020, 15, 100409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.; Achal, V. Environmental and health impacts due to e-waste disposal in China–A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 139745. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, J.; Huang, S.; BalaMurugan, S.; Tamizharasi, G.S. Artificial intelligence based e-waste management for environmental planning. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2021, 87, 106498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, Y.; Yeh, C.-H.; Yang, S.; Gupta, B. Risk-based performance evaluation of improvement strategies for sustainable e-waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 155, 104664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thakur, P.; Kumar, S. Evaluation of e-waste status, management strategies, and legislations. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Awasthi, A.K.; Li, J. Management of electrical and electronic waste: A comparative evaluation of China and India. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 434–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Boubellouta, B.; Kusch-Brandt, S. Cross-country evidence on Environmental Kuznets Curve in Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment for 174 Countries. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020, 25, 136–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bakhiyi, B.; Gravel, S.; Ceballos, D.; Flynn, M.A.; Zayed, J. Has the question of e-waste opened a Pandora’s box? An overview of unpredictable issues and challenges. Environ. Int. 2018, 110, 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. United States Environmental Protection Agency. The Hidden Climate Impacts of Electronics: F-GHGs. 2015. Available online: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1013P1A.PDF?Dockey=P1013P1A.PDF (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  29. Leclerc, S.H.; Badami, M.G. Extended producer responsibility for E-waste management: Policy drivers and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 251, 119657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Islam, A.; Ahmed, M.T.; Awual, R.; Rahman, A.; Sultana, M.; Aziz, A.A.; Monir, M.U.; Teo, S.; Hasan, M. Advances in sustainable approaches to recover metals from e-waste-A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 244, 118815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Leung, A.O.W. Environmental Contamination and Health Effects Due to E-waste Recycling. In Electronic Waste Management and Treatment Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 335–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rene, E.R.; Sethurajan, M.; Ponnusamy, V.K.; Kumar, G.; Dung, T.N.B.; Brindhadevi, K.; Pugazhendhi, A. Electronic waste generation, recycling and resource recovery: Technological perspectives and trends. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125664. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zeng, X.; Yang, C.; Chiang, J.F.; Li, J. Innovating e-waste management: From macroscopic to microscopic scales. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 575, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Freitas, R.; Cardoso, C.E.D.; Costa, S.; Morais, T.; Moleiro, P.; Lima, A.F.; Soares, M.; Figueiredo, S.; Águeda, T.L.; Rocha, P.; et al. New insights on the impacts of e-waste towards marine bivalves: The case of the rare earth element Dysprosium. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 260, 113859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ikhlayel, M. An integrated approach to establish e-waste management systems for developing countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 170, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Srivastava, R.R.; Pathak, P. Policy issues for efficient management of E-waste in developing countries. In Handbook of Electronic Waste Management; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kazancoglu, Y.; Ozkan-Ozen, Y.D.; Mangla, S.K.; Ram, M. Risk assessment for sustainability in e-waste recycling in circular economy. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krishnan, S.; Zulkapli, N.S.; Kamyab, H.; Taib, S.M.; Din, M.F.B.M.; Majid, Z.A.; Chaiprapat, S.; Kenzo, I.; Ichikawa, Y.; Nasrullah, M.; et al. Current technologies for recovery of metals from industrial wastes: An overview. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. United Nations. The 17 Goals. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved 20 March 2021. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  40. Rosen, M.A.; Bulucea, C.A. Using Exergy to Understand and Improve the Efficiency of Electrical Power Technologies. Entropy 2009, 11, 820–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, T.H.; Wang, W.; Li, Q. Advancement in materials for energy-saving lighting devices. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2012, 6, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sukumaran, S.; Sudhakar, K. Performance analysis of solar powered airport based on energy and exergy analysis. Energy 2018, 149, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baskut, O.; Ozgener, O.; Ozgener, L. Effects of meteorological variables on exergetic efficiency of wind turbine power plants. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 3237–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Koroneos, C.; Spachos, T.; Moussiopoulos, N. Exergy analysis of renewable energy sources. Renew. energy. 2003, 28, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rawat, R.; Kaushik, S.C.; Sastry, O.S.; Singh, Y.K.; Bora, B. Energy and exergy performance analysis of CdS/CdTe based photovoltaic technology in real operating conditions of composite climate. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 110, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Izgi, E.; Akkaya, Y.E. Exergoeconomic analysis of a solar photovoltaic system. Istanb, Turkey. Turk. J. Elec. Eng. & Comp. Sci. 2013, 21, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sudhakar, K.; Srivastava, T. Energy and exergy analysis of 36 W solar photovoltaic module. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2014, 35, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crabtree, G.W.; Lewis, N.S. Solar energy conversion. Phys. Today 2007, 60, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mehrpooya, M.; Shahsavan, M.; Sharifzadeh, M.M.M. Modeling, energy and exergy analysis of solar chimney power plant-Tehran climate data case study. Energy 2016, 115, 257–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Baghbanbashi, M.; Pazuki, G. Modelling and thermodynamic assessment of biofuel production process from biomass with the SAFT-VR approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 16797–16806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Panwar, N.; Kaushik, S.; Kothari, S. A review on energy and exergy analysis of solar dying systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2812–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. da Silva, G.M.; Ferreira, A.G.; Coutinho, R.M.; Maia, C.B. Energy and exergy analysis of the drying of corn grains. Renew. Energy 2020, 163, 1942–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ahmadi, G.R.; Toghraie, D. Energy and exergy analysis of Montazeri Steam Power Plant in Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rosen, M.A. Energy- and exergy-based comparison of coal-fired and nuclear steam power plants. Exergy, Int. J. 2001, 1, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Polinder, H.; Van Der Pijl, F.F.A.; De Vilder, G.-J.; Tavner, P.J. Comparison of Direct-Drive and Geared Generator Concepts for Wind Turbines. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2006, 21, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kamate, S.; Gangavati, P. Exergy analysis of cogeneration power plants in sugar industries. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2009, 29, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rosen, M.A.; Le, M.N.; Dincer, I. Efficiency analysis of a cogeneration and district energy system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2005, 25, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abu-Hamdeh, N.H.; Alnefaie, K.A. Energy and exergy analysis and optimum working conditions of a renewable energy system using a transient systems simulation program. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2020, 38, 1248–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sealed Lead Acid Battery Application. Transtronics, Inc.: Lawrence, KA, USA. Available online: http://xtronics.com/reference/batterap.htm (accessed on 24 June 2009).
  60. Cownden, R.; Nahon, M.; Rosen, M.A. Exergy analysis of a fuel cell power system for transportation applications. Exergy, Int. J. 2001, 1, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Koroneos, C.J.; Nanaki, E.A.; Xydis, G. Exergy analysis of the energy use in Greece. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 2475–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yan, L.; He, B. On a clean power generation system with the co-gasification of biomass and coal in a quadruple fluidized bed gasifier. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 235, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mehrpooya, M.; Khalili, M.; Sharifzadeh, M.M.M. Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 869–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Taner, T. Energy and exergy analyze of PEM fuel cell: A case study of modeling and simulations. Energy 2018, 143, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arshad, A.; Ali, H.M.; Habib, A.; Bashir, M.A.; Jabbal, M.; Yan, Y. Energy and exergy analysis of fuel cells: A review. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2018, 9, 308–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kalaiarasi, G.; Velraj, R.; Swami, M.V. Experimental energy and exergy analysis of a flat plate solar air heater with a new design of integrated sensible heat storage. Energy 2016, 111, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Edalatpour, M.; Kianifar, A.; Aryana, K.; Tiwari, G.N. Energy, exergy, and cost analyses of a double-glazed solar air heater using phase change material. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 8, 015101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Acır, A.; Ata, I.; Şahin, I. Energy and exergy analyses of a new solar air heater with circular-type turbulators having different relief angles. Int. J. Exergy 2016, 20, 85–104. [Google Scholar]
  69. Acır, A.; Canlı, M.E.; Ata, I.; Tanürün, H.E. Effect of the circular shaped turbulator having varying hole number of energy and exergy efficiencies of solar air heater. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2018, 40, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ghiami, A.; Kianifar, A.; Aryana, K.; Edalatpour, M. Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Single-Pass Sequenced Array Baffled Solar Air Heater with Packed Bed Latent Storage Unit for Nocturnal Use. Heat Transfer—Asian Res. 2016, 46, 546–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abuşka, M. Energy and exergy analysis of solar air heater having new design absorber plate with conical surface. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 131, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Aktaş, M.; Sözen, A.; Tuncer, A.D.; Arslan, E.; Koşan, M.; Çürük, O. Energy exergy analysis of a novel multi-pass solar air collector with perforated fins. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2019, 8, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mustapha, M.; Fudholi, A.; Yen, C.H.; Ruslan, M.H.; Sopian, K. Review on energy and exergy analysis of air and water based photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector. Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst. 2018, 9, 1367. [Google Scholar]
  74. Fudholi, A.; Ibrahim, A.; Othman, M.; Ruslan, M.H.; Kazem, H.; Zaharim, A.; Sopian, K. Energy and Exergy Analyses on Water based Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) Collector with Spiral Flow Absorber. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Energy Systems, Environment, Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ICESEEI ’13), Antalya, Turkey, 8–10 October 2013; pp. 70–74. [Google Scholar]
  75. Final Report EFP project 1713/00-0014 Photovoltaic / Thermal Solar Collectors and Their Potential in Denmark. Available online: https://nanopdf.com/download/photovoltaic-thermal-solar-collectors-and-their-potential-in_pdf (accessed on 13 November 2021).
  76. Joshi, A.S.; Tiwari, A. Energy and exergy efficiencies of a hybrid photovoltaic–thermal (PV/T) air collector. Renew. Energy 2007, 32, 2223–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shahsavar, A.; Ameri, M.; Gholampour, M. Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Photovoltaic-Thermal Collector With Natural Air Flow. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2011, 134, 011014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shah, P.; Agrawal, R.; Kachhwaha, S.S. Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Source. In Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 519–529. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ghorbani, B.; Mehrpooya, M.; Ardehali, A. Energy and exergy analysis of wind farm integrated with compressed air energy storage using multi-stage phase change material. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cheng, S.; Zhao, G.; Gao, M.; Shi, Y.; Huang, M.; Marefati, M. A new hybrid solar photovoltaic/ phosphoric acid fuel cell and energy storage system; Energy and Exergy performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 46, 8048–8066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nosratabadi, S.M.; Hemmati, R.; Bornapour, M.; Abdollahpour, M. Economic evaluation and energy/exergy analysis of PV/Wind/PEMFC energy resources employment based on capacity, type of source and government incentive policies: Case study in Iran. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 43, 100963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ozgener, O.; Hepbasli, A. A review on the energy and exergy analysis of solar assisted heat pump systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 482–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kotas, T.J. The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis, reprint ed.; Krieger: Malabar, FL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  84. Humphreys, C.J. Solid-state lighting. MRS Bull. 2008, 33, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Wei, Z.; Zmeureanu, R. Exergy analysis of variable air volume systems for an office building. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Almasri, R.A.; Almarshoud, A.F.; Omar, H.M.; Esmaeil, K.K.; Alshitawi, M. Exergy and Economic Analysis of Energy Consumption in the Residential Sector of the Qassim Region in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Saidur, R.; Masjuki, H.; Jamaluddin, M. An application of energy and exergy analysis in residential sector of Malaysia. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 1050–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Xu, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Sun, F. Energy and exergy analysis of solar power tower plants. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2011, 31, 3904–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rosen, M.A.; Dincer, I. Sectoral Energy and Exergy Modeling of Turkey. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 1997, 119, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Utlu, Z.; Hepbasli, A. A review and assessment of the energy utilization efficiency in the Turkish industrial sector using energy and exergy analysis method. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 1438–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Edelenbosch, O.; van Vuuren, D.; Blok, K.; Calvin, K.; Fujimori, S. Mitigating energy demand sector emissions: The integrated modelling perspective. Appl. Energy 2020, 261, 114347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Barletta, I.; Larborn, J.; Mani, M.; Johannson, B. Towards an Assessment Methodology to Support Decision Making for Sustainable Electronic Waste Management Systems: Automatic Sorting Technology. Sustainability 2016, 8, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Cruz-Sotelo, S.E.; Ojeda-Benítez, S.; Jáuregui Sesma, J.; Velázquez-Victorica, K.I.; Santillán-Soto, N.; García-Cueto, O.R.; Concepción, V.A.; Alcántara, C. E-waste supply chain in Mexico: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable management. Sustainability 2017, 9, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Schmidt, T.S.; Sewerin, S. Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics. Nat. Energy 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Meckling, J.; Sterner, T.; Wagner, G. Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 918–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Maheswaran, D.; Rangaraj, V.; Kailas, K.J.; Kumar, W.A. December. Energy efficiency in electrical systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Bengaluru, India, 16–19 December; 2012; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  97. Miner, K.J.; Rampedi, I.T.; Ifegbesan, A.P.; Machete, F. Survey on Household Awareness and Willingness to Participate in E-Waste Management in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Bose, B.K. Global warming: Energy, environmental pollution, and the impact of power electronics. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 2010, 4, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wibowo, N.; Piton, J.K.; Nurcahyo, R.; Gabriel, D.S.; Farizal, F.; Madsuha, A.F. Strategies for Improving the E-Waste Management Supply Chain Sustainability in Indonesia (Jakarta). Sustainability 2021, 13, 13955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Abubakar, I.; Khalid, S.N.; Mustafa, M.W.; Shareef, H.; Mustapha, M. Application of load monitoring in appliances’ energy management–A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017, 67, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bhowmik, C.; Bhowmik, S.; Ray, A.; Pandey, K.M. Optimal green energy planning for sustainable development: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71, 796–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Arshad, R.; Zahoor, S.; Shah, M.A.; Wahid, A.; Yu, H. Green IoT: An Investigation on Energy Saving Practices for 2020 and Beyond. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 15667–15681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Abalansa, S.; El Mahrad, B.; Icely, J.; Newton, A. Electronic Waste, an Environmental Problem Exported to Developing Countries: The GOOD, the BAD and the UGLY. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kumar, S.; Kumar, V.; Kaiwartya, O.; Dohare, U.; Kumar, N.; Lloret, J. Towards green communication in wireless sensor network: GA enabled distributed zone approach. Ad Hoc Networks 2019, 93, 101903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (accessed on 1 November 2021).
  106. Murthy, V.; Ramakrishna, S. A Review on Global E-Waste Management: Urban Mining towards a Sustainable Future and Circular Economy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Husain, I.; Ozpineci, B.; Islam, S.; Gurpinar, E.; Su, G.-J.; Yu, W.; Chowdhury, S.; Xue, L.; Rahman, D.; Sahu, R. Electric Drive Technology Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities for Future Electric Vehicles. Proc. IEEE 2021, 109, 1039–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Delucchi, M.A.; Jacobson, M.Z. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1170–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ding, Y.; Zhang, S.; Liu, B.; Zheng, H.; Chang, C.-C.; Ekberg, C. Recovery of precious metals from electronic waste and spent catalysts: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 141, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Withanage, S.; Habib, K. Life Cycle Assessment and Material Flow Analysis: Two Under-Utilized Tools for Informing E-Waste Management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, Z.; Cai, W. Remanufacturability evaluation of end-of-life products considering technology, economy and environment: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 764, 142922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Asif, F.M.; Lieder, M.; Rashid, A. Multi-method simulation based tool to evaluate economic and environmental performance of circular product systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 1261–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cai, W.; Lai, K.-H.; Liu, C.; Wei, F.; Ma, M.; Jia, S.; Jiang, Z.; Lv, L. Promoting sustainability of manufacturing industry through the lean energy-saving and emission-reduction strategy. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 665, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Present electricity related primary resources usages [2].
Figure 1. Present electricity related primary resources usages [2].
Sustainability 14 04036 g001
Figure 2. The trend of e-products and e-waste accumulation.
Figure 2. The trend of e-products and e-waste accumulation.
Sustainability 14 04036 g002
Figure 3. E-product and e-waste modeling pathways.
Figure 3. E-product and e-waste modeling pathways.
Sustainability 14 04036 g003
Figure 4. Pathways to e-product innovation and e-waste processing.
Figure 4. Pathways to e-product innovation and e-waste processing.
Sustainability 14 04036 g004
Table 1. Relationship between sustainable development goals and e-waste management [5,6,39].
Table 1. Relationship between sustainable development goals and e-waste management [5,6,39].
Sustainable
Development Goal (SDG)
ScopeSpecific Target
SDG 12: Responsible consumption and
production
Hazardous waste managementTarget 12.4 aims to achieve the environmentally sound management of chemicals and all waste throughout their life cycle, in accordance with agreed international frameworks, and to significantly reduce their release into the air, water, and soil in order to minimize their adverse impacts on human health and the environment.

Target 12.5 aims to substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, repair, recycling, and reuse. An increasing number of people on the planet are consuming growing amounts of goods, and it is critical for production and consumption to be more sustainable by raising the awareness levels of producers and consumers, specifically in the area of electrical and electronic equipment.
SDG 3: Good health and well-beingProtection of public healthTarget 3.9 refers to a reduction in the number of deaths and illnesses caused by hazardous chemicals as well as air, water, and soil pollution and contamination.
SDG 9: Industry innovation and infrastructure Environmentally sound energy technologiesTarget 9.4 refers to upgrading infrastructure and retrofitting industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource-use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes, with all countries’ actions in accordance with their respective capabilities.
SDG 7: Affordable and clean energyEnergy efficiencyTarget 7.2 refers to an increase in the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.
SDG 6: Clean water and sanitationEnvironmentally sound management of all wastes, particularly hazardous
wastes
Target 6.3 aims to reduce pollution, eliminate dumping, and minimize the release of hazardous chemicals and materials.
SDG 11: Sustainable
cities and communities
Access for all to adequate, safe, and
affordable solid waste collection services
Target 11.6 aims to reduce the adverse environmental impact of cities, with special attention to waste management.
Table 2. Energy and exergy efficiencies of electrical power generation, conversion, and storage systems with future prospects.
Table 2. Energy and exergy efficiencies of electrical power generation, conversion, and storage systems with future prospects.
Analyzed SystemsEfficiency (%)Future ProspectsRef
EnergyExergy
Solar Powered Systems
12 MW PV power plant14.589.77PV panels consisted of nanoparticles-based or concentrated PV cells
Hybrid PV/hydro/energy storage/wind-based generation system
[42,45,46,47]
3.2 kW PV power plant9.8410.62
750 W PV power plant4.5–8.53–6.5
36 W PV power plant6–98–12
Solar thermal power generation10–3010–30Mirror dish concentrator-based solar thermal power system[48]
Solar chimney power plant3–93.32.29Hybrid PV/hydro/energy storage/wind-based generation system[49]
Solar tower system22.8924.48Advanced power cycles, reheat process, and inlet supercritical steam-based solar tower system[50]
Solar dying system40–68.6341.9–70.94Hybrid solar dryer and air drying system[51,52]
Electrical Conversion Systems
Transformer93–9893–98Solid state transformer[40]
Alternator70–7370–73Electric turbo alternators[40]
Generator90–9590–95Permanent magnet synchronous generator
Renewable energy-based distributed generators
[40]
Static converter80–8780–87Energy-efficient power switches (MOSFET/IGBTS)-based converters[40]
Motor97–9997–99Permanent magnet synchronous motor[40]
Power Generation Plants
Thermal power plant64100Renewable energy-based power generation systems or distributed generators[53]
Steam power pant3235.2[54]
Coal-fired power plant3736[53]
Nuclear power plant3030Small modular reactor (SMR)-based nuclear power plant[53]
Hydroelectric power plant9090Hybrid PV/hydro/energy storage/wind-based generation system
Modular hydropower system
[40]
Wind turbine system80–9780–97Bladeless wind turbines
Hybrid PV/hydro/energy storage/wind-based generation system
[55]
Combined Generation System
Cogeneration system9334.4Combined heat and power (CHP) combined-cycle power plants[56]
Trigeneration system9428Renewable energy-based trigeneration system[57]
Solar trigeneration system50.5336.88Hybrid solar/biomass trigeneration system[58]
Battery Storage System
Battery (lead–acid)75–8575–85Lithium-ion/lithium-sulfur/solid-state batteries[59]
Transportation System
Electric transportation system (traction)8080Hybrid renewable energy and energy storage powered transportation system
Electric transportation system (electric rheostatic braking)8030
Electric transportation system (electric braking with recovery)8073[60]
Coal Gasification
Conventional coal gasification5546Integrated gasification fuel cell (IGFC) process (coal/fuel cell/biomass)[61]
Biomass and coal gasification process5047[62]
Biomass-based supercritical water gasification88.383.6[50]
Biomass gasification process90.287[63]
Fuel Cell (FC) Technology
Polymer electrolyte membrane FC (PEMFC)47.650.4Reversible fuel cells[64]
Solid oxide FC (SOFCs)5856[65]
Molten carbonate FC (MCFC)5060–80%[65]
Solar Air Heater (SAH)
SAH with copper tubes49.4–59.218.25–35.53Obstacle type solar air heater; porous baffles inserted in a solar air heater[66]
SAH with phase change material58.33–68.7714.15–26.34[67]
SAH with circular turbulator absorber plate28.6–79.58.1–42.4[68]
SAH with plain tube58.319.7–21.7[69]
SAH with packed bed paraffin wax20.7–26.810.7–19.5[70]
SAH with conical and smooth absorber plate64–74.69.2–12.5[71]
SAH with multi-pass collector perforated fins48.88–83.478.74–23.97[72]
Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) Technology
Air and Water based PVT Collector40–705–25Water-based PVT collector integrated with sheet-and-tube channel[73]
Water based PVT collector with spiral flow absorber58–6825[74]
Water-heating PVT and PVT air collector6012[75]
PVT plate parallel air collector55–6512–15[76]
PVT collector with natural airflow28–406–9[77]
Hybrid Energy System
Hybrid PV/wind system20–2540–45Smart microgrid/nanogrid consisted of renewable and energy storage systems[78]
Hybrid wind/ compressed air energy storage70.8380.71[79]
Hybrid PV/fuel cell/energy storage system76.58.91[80]
PV/wind/fuel cell16.320.8[81]
Table 3. Energy and exergy efficiencies of residential loads and industrial processes/sectors with future prospects.
Table 3. Energy and exergy efficiencies of residential loads and industrial processes/sectors with future prospects.
Analyzed SystemsEfficiency (%)Future ProspectsRef
EnergyExergy
Residential Sector
Resistance space heater996Vented and unvented combustion small space heaters[40]
Ground source heat pump73.171.8Solar-assisted heat pump[82]
Refrigeration system607Inverter-based refrigeration system[83]
Water Pump7070Digitalized and solar pumps
Brushless or permanent magnet synchronous motor-based pump
[84]
Fan9090Smart ceiling fans; brushless direct current (DC) motor fans[85]
Lighting (incandescent)55Carbon-dot light emitting diodes (CLED)
[85]
Lighting (fluorescent)2020
Electric oven (home)70–8550–55Smart, emission-free, direct-fired, fueled tunnel oven[85]
Toaster7040Smart digitalized toaster[85]
Clothes dryer6030Smart ultrasonic cloth dryer[85]
Light-emitting diodes (LED)27.321.3CLED[86]
Television (TV)8080Smart LED TV[86]
Washing machine8080Smart inverter-based washing machine[86]
Water pump8080Digitalized and solar pumps
Brushless or permanent magnet synchronous motor-based pump
[86]
Vacuum cleaner7070Wireless robotic vacuum cleaners[86]
Iron9820.1Smart steam electric irons[86]
Microwave7024.2Solid-state microwave oven
Laterally diffused metal oxide semiconductor (LDMOS) microwave oven
[86]
Exhaust blower8080Low profile blowers with thinner, lightweight materials[86]
Water cooler20010.6Smart hybrid cooler[86]
Computer7575Using Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) processor-based PC[86]
Dishwasher8080Smart waterless dishwashers[86]
Rice cooker8017.2Induction heated rice cooker[87]
Blender8080Brushless motor-based blender[87]
Toaster9830Smart digitalized toaster[87]
Kettle9010.8Smart digitalized kettle[87]
Mobile charger7070Wireless charger[87]
Hair dryer7070Smart nanotechnology-based hair dryer[87]
Air conditioner604.09Inverter-based air conditioner[87]
Water heater902.54Tankless and on-demand water heater, heat pump water heater, solar water heater[87]
Electric stove987.3Induction cooker[87]
Electric gate8080Permanent magnet synchronous motor base gate propeller[87]
Water filter7070Nanotechnology and photocatalytic technology-based water filter[87]
Industrial Process
High-pressure steam boiler9050Modular steam boiler[88]
Industrial heater7051Induction heaters[40]
Tobacco dryer (fuel)404Solar and air dryer[89]
Blast furnace7646Biomass-based blast furnace[89]
Petroleum refining9010Permanent magnet synchronous motors, efficient motor drives and upgraded motor-driven equipment[89]
Industrial Sector
Iron steel5341Permanent magnet synchronous motors
Efficient motor drives
Upgraded motor-driven equipment using smart and advanced manufacturing process
[90]
Chemical-petrochemical 6517
Petrochemical feedstock 5031
Fertilizer6028
Cement5729
Sugar6218
Non-iron metals5926
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghosh, B.K.; Mekhilef, S.; Ahmad, S.; Ghosh, S.K. A Review on Global Emissions by E-Products Based Waste: Technical Management for Reduced Effects and Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4036. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14074036

AMA Style

Ghosh BK, Mekhilef S, Ahmad S, Ghosh SK. A Review on Global Emissions by E-Products Based Waste: Technical Management for Reduced Effects and Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability. 2022; 14(7):4036. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14074036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghosh, Bablu K., Saad Mekhilef, Shameem Ahmad, and Swapan K. Ghosh. 2022. "A Review on Global Emissions by E-Products Based Waste: Technical Management for Reduced Effects and Achieving Sustainable Development Goals" Sustainability 14, no. 7: 4036. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su14074036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop