The Spatial Effect of Industrial Intelligence on High-Quality Green Development of Industry under Environmental Regulations and Low Carbon Intensity

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The topic of this research is interesting with significant value to be investigated. Some contrinbutions and innovative results are achieved. However there are some great problems that need to be clarified and/or improved before it can be accepted as is. So I suggest to review it after a minor revision.

1， In the introduction section, why to conduct this research needs to be stated clearly from the practical applications, which is not enough in  the current version of the paper;

2, In section "2. Development of Hypothesis",  each hypothesis is formed as one subsection, which is not necessary.  Thus, I suggest to remove all subsections' title.

3,  The text in "Figure 1: A research framework" is not shown fully, moreover the 5 hypothesess should be displayed in the figure.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Literature review needs developing. The LR is short and focussed upon justifying the hypotheses and so it lacks coherence and detail. Need to expand the Literature.

Needs a discussion section. Nothing there after the results

Conclusions need expanding to provide a connection to the discussion section when produced and more detailed section fo work.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The topic is interesting and the analysis is correct. There are some problems that need to be further improved by the author.

1)Add literature that is closely related to the article, for example,

Decisions and Coordination of Retailer-led Low-carbon Supply Chain under Altruistic Preference. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 293(1): 910-925

Manufacturer’s Decision-making Model under Carbon Emission Permits Repurchase Strategy and Capital Constraints, International Journal of Production Research, 10.1080/00207543.2021.1934909

2) Increase the management inspiration of the paper.

3) It is recommended to add real business cases to further verify the conclusions of the paper

 It is recommended to accept after modification

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Updates provided are acceptable. Recommendation to publish

Reviewer 3 Report

The author has made modifications according to the comments of the reviewers, and the suggestions are accepted