Investigation of West Lake Ecotourism Capabilities Using SWOT and TOPSIS Decision-Making Methods
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Determining the internal (strengths and weaknesses) and external (opportunities and threats) variables influencing the development of the West Lake tourism;
- Identifying and developing suitable strategies for the growth of the West Lake tourism industry;
- Ranking strategic initiatives according to the West Lake tourism industry’s key factors.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Study Area
2.1.1. Urbanization of Scenic Spots
2.1.2. Uneven Distribution of Sightseeing Activities
2.1.3. Improper Use of Resources
2.2. Research Methodology
2.3. Strategic Planning Stages of Research
- Start Stage
- Input Phase
- After examining the external factors, the known factors that cause opportunities or threats for the tourism destination were listed.
- Determining the weight of factors: This weight is in the range of zero to one. Coefficients indicate the relative importance of a factor. Often, a higher coefficient is given to factors that create opportunities or success (compared to threatening factors). At this stage, weights and coefficients were assigned to the previously enumerated factors. These coefficients for external elements (opportunities and threats) ranged from 0 to 1, indicating a factor’s relative significance. West Lake’s mission, perspective, and values were used to determine the coefficients of importance. For weighing the opportunities and threats, a questionnaire developed by researchers was utilized (Supplement S1). The experts were asked to provide a value between 0 and 1 to each of the opportunities and threats. In addition, the total weight of all opportunities and threats must equal 1. The average weights derived from the opinions of experts were then utilized as the basis for decision-making and the final weight of opportunities and threats.
- Factors that lead to success were given a score of 1 to 4.This number shows the effectiveness of the current strategies of the system in showing the reaction to the mentioned factor. Number 4 is a high reaction, number 3 is an above average reaction, number 2 is an average reaction, and number 1 is a weak reaction. These points were determined according to the effectiveness of the system’s strategies. In this stage, each factor (opportunities and threats) was ranked from 1 to 4 based on its effectiveness in achieving the ideal condition. For weighting the opportunities and threats, a questionnaire developed by researchers was utilized (Supplement S1). Towards this aim, each opportunity and threat was assigned a ranking between 1 and 4 by the experts. The average scores gathered from the opinions of experts were then utilized as the basis for decision-making and the final assessment of the West Lake’s opportunities and threats.
- The final weight of each factor was obtained by multiplying that factor by the corresponding score. Finally, using the arithmetic mean, the score of opportunities and threats was extracted.
- Calculation of the total final score of each factor in order to determine the total final scores of the tourist destination: In the evaluation matrix of external factors, irrespective of the number of factors that cause opportunities or threats, the sum of the final scores of the system will never be more than 4 or less than 1. The average of this sum is 2.5. If the sum of these numbers reaches 4, it means that the system reacts very well to the factors that cause threats and opportunities.
- After examining the internal factors, the most important factors were listed. The elected factors include the strengths and weaknesses of the region’s tourism system.
- These factors were given a coefficient from 0 (unimportant) to 1. The relative importance of each factor in the success of the tourism industry system was determined by the coefficient given to the factor. In this stage, weights and coefficients were assigned to the previously enumerated factors. These coefficients for internal factors (strengths and weaknesses) ranged from 0 to 1, indicating a factor’s relative significance. West Lake’s mission, perspective, and values were used to determine the coefficients of importance. For weighing the strengths and weaknesses, a questionnaire developed by researchers was utilized (Supplement S1). The experts were asked to provide a value between 0 and 1 to each of the strengths and weaknesses. In addition, the total weight of all strengths and weaknesses must equal 1. The average weights derived from the opinions of experts were then utilized as the basis for decision-making and the final weight of strengths and weaknesses.
- A score from 1 to 4 was given to each factor. Score 1 indicates basic weakness, score 2 indicates low weakness, score 3 indicates strength, and score 4 indicates very high strength of the discussed factor. In this stage, each factor (strength or weakness) was ranked from 1 to 4 based on its effectiveness in achieving the ideal condition. For weighting the strengths and weaknesses, a questionnaire developed by researchers was utilized (Supplement S1). Towards this aim, each strength and weakness was assigned a ranking between 1 and 4 by the experts. The average scores gathered from the opinions of experts were then utilized as the basis for decision-making and the final assessment of the West Lake’s strengths and weaknesses.
- The final weight of each factor was obtained by multiplying that factor by the corresponding score. Finally, using the arithmetic mean, the score of strengths and weaknesses was extracted.
- Next followed calculation of the total final score of each factor in order to determine the total final scores of the tourist destination. Irrespective of the number of factors in the evaluation matrix, the sum of the final scores will be between 1 and 4, and their average is 2.5.
- Comparison Stage
- Prepare a set of main opportunities that exist in the external environment of the tourist destination;
- Prepare a set of main threats that exist in the external environment of the tourist destination;
- Prepare a set of main strengths of the tourist destination;
- Prepare a set of major weaknesses of the tourist destination;
- External opportunities and internal strengths were compared and the result was provided in the intended place in the SO strategy group;
- External opportunities and internal weaknesses were compared and the result was written in the relevant place in the group of WO strategies;
- External threats and internal strengths were compared and the result was written in the relevant place in the ST strategies group;
- External threats and internal weaknesses were compared and the result was written in the relevant place in the WT strategies group.
- Decision Stage
- J1 = {1, 2, 3, …, n| for positive index elements
- J2 = {1, 2, 3, …, n| for negative index elements
3. Results
3.1. Inferential Data Analysis
3.2. Analysis of Internal and External Variables
3.3. Developing Strategies with SWOT Model
3.4. TOPSIS Model Findings
3.5. Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) of the Tourism Industry of West Lake
4. Discussion
- 1.
- Optimal utilization of the lake’s natural, cultural, and historical potential and attractions in order to develop and attract tourists and generate jobs and revenues.
- 2.
- Planning to use the tourism capacity of the 2022 Asian Games in Hangzhou, due to the superior cultural, historical, and natural features of the lake.
- 3.
- Utilizing the lake’s unique location for cross-border tourism development.
- 4.
- Emphasis on the promotion of ecotourism given the region’s capacity.
- 5.
- Improving collaboration between relevant groups and authorities to combine the lake’s capabilities.
- 1.
- Optimal utilization of the lake’s natural, cultural, and historical potential and attractions in order to develop and attract tourists and generate jobs and revenues;
- 2.
- Formulation of strategic plans to maximize potential and opportunities in order to attract tourists in all seasons of the year.
- 3.
- Planning to use the tourism capacity of the 2022 Asian Games in Hangzhou, due to the superior cultural, historical, and natural features of the lake.
- 4.
- Utilizing the capabilities and resources of the private sector to enhance the lake’s aging tourism routes.
5. Conclusions
- -
- To use all the potential and natural attractions of the West Lake to develop the tourism industry of the region;
- -
- To take basic measures to attract public and private sector investors in the field of facilities, tourism services, and productive and job-creating activities;
- -
- It is suggested that basic planning be done to prevent excessive pressure from tourists on natural environments;
- -
- Prioritizing development strategies of the West Lake tourism using the Friedman’s test.
- -
- It is also suggested to use AHP and BWM methods for factor weighting.
- -
- In order to check uncertainty, evaluations based on fuzzy logic are suggested.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ballantyne, R.; Packer, J.; Hughes, K. Tourists’ support for conservation messages and sustainable management practices in wildlife tourism experiences. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kollman, H.; Mitteaback, R.; Weiskopt, K. Intellected and emotion: Water and geotourism in the elsenwarzen geopark. New challenges with geotourism. In Proceedings of the 8th European Geoparks Conference, Idanha-a-nova, Portugal, 14–18 September 2009; pp. 51–55. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.-S. The impact of crisis events and macroeconomic activity on Taiwan’s international inbound tourism demand. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shugar, D.H.; Jacquemart, M.; Shean, D.; Bhushan, S.; Upadhyay, K.; Sattar, A.; Schwanghart, W.; McBride, S.; de Vries, M.V.W.; Mergili, M.; et al. A massive rock and ice avalanche caused the 2021 disaster at Chamoli, Indian Himalaya. Science 2021, 373, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wijnmalen, D.J. Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP–ANP: A critical validation. Math. Comput. Model. 2017, 46, 892–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inskeep, E. Tourism Planning Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- The, L.; Cabanban, A.S. Planning for sustainable tourism in southern PulauBanggi: An assessment of biophysical conditions and their implications for future. J. Environ. Manag. 2007, 85, 999–1008. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, H.-H.; Huang, W.-C. Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Math. Comput. Model. 2006, 43, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, C.W.; Chan, N.W. Strenght-Weakness-Opportunities-Threats Analysis of Penang National Park for Strategic Ecotourism Management. World Appl. Sci. J. 2010, 10, 136–145. [Google Scholar]
- Kumari, S.; Behera, M.D.; Tewari, H.R. Identification of potential ecotourism sites in West District, Sikkim using geospatial tools. Trop. Ecol. 2010, 51, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
- Reihanian, A.; Mahmood, N.Z.B.; Kahrom, E.; Hin, T.W. Sustainable tourism development strategy by SWOT analysis: Boujagh National Park, Iran. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2012, 4, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ervural, B.C.; Zaim, S.; Demirel, O.F.; Aydin, Z.; Delen, D. An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy planning. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1538–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papapostolou, A.; Karakosta, C.; Apostolidis, G.; Doukas, H. An AHP-SWOT-Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for Achieving a Cross-Border RES Cooperation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Solangi, Y.A.; Tan, Q.; Mirjat, N.H.; Ali, S. Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falcone, P.M. Tourism-Based Circular Economy in Salento (South Italy): A SWOT-ANP Analysis. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anser, M.K.; Mohsin, M.; Abbas, Q.; Chaudhry, I.S. Assessing the integration of solar power projects: SWOT-based AHP–F-TOPSIS case study of Turkey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 31737–31749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Büyüközkan, G.; Mukul, E.; Kongar, E. Health tourism strategy selection via SWOT analysis and integrated hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP-MABAC approach. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 2021, 74, 100929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bivrani, H.; Ghofran, A. Explaining and Applying TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Ranking Urban Areas in terms of Crime and Delinquency. J. Detect. Second. Term 2009, 2, 131–150. [Google Scholar]
- Gorman, C.E. Land scape and geotourism: Market typologies and visitor needs. In Conference: Promotion and Protection, Achieving the Balance; School of Hospitality Management and Tourism; Dublin Institute of Technology: Dublin, Ireland, 2007; pp. 101–102. [Google Scholar]
- Jablonska, J.; Timkak, G.; Pixova, D. Geotourism and water quality of river Hornad. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2009, 14, 213–220. [Google Scholar]
- Zouros, N.C. Geotourism development in the Lesvos petrified forest geopark. In Proceedings of the 8th European Geoparks Conference, Idanha-a-nova, Portugal, 14–18 September 2009; Volume 8, pp. 93–97. [Google Scholar]
- Farsani, N.T.; Coelho, C.; Costa, C. Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio- economic. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2011, 13, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuenterawong, P. Interactive Communication Design to Enhance Tourists’ Traveling Experiences in Chiang Rai. Commun. Media Asia Pac. (CMAP) 2019, 2, 73–92. [Google Scholar]
- Bas, E. The integrated framework for analysis of electricity supply chain using an integrated SWOT-fuzzy TOPSIS methodology combined with AHP: The case of Turkey. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2013, 44, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karoubi, M.; Ahmadi, S. Strategic planning of medical tourism using the SWOT Matrix-Fuzzy TOPSIS Technique. Tour. Manag. Stud. 2020, 15, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dachyar, A.Z.N.S.M.; Sahir, A. Hotel revival strategy planning with SWOT-Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS: A case study of 4-star hotel. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore, 7–11 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, Z.; Wang, X. Research on the Tourism Development and Countermeasures of Nishan Town—Based on SWOT Analysis. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 2021, 14, 429–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swangjang, K.; Kornpiphat, P. Does ecotourism in a Mangrove area at Klong Kone, Thailand, conform to sustainable tourism? A case study using SWOT and DPSIR. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 15960–15985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghorbani, A.; Raufirad, V.; Rafiaani, P.; Azadi, H. Ecotourism sustainable development strategies using SWOT and QSPM model: A case study of KajiNamakzar Wetland, South Khorasan Province, Iran. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2015, 16, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yazdani, S.; Hosseini, F.; Ahmady, S. System based practice: A concept analysis. J. Adv. Med Educ. Prof. 2016, 4, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
- García-Melón, M.; Gómez-Navarro, T.; Acuña-Dutra, S. An ANP Approach to Assess the Sustainability of Tourist Strategies for the Coastal NP of Venezuela. In Proceedings of the 5th International Vilnius conference, Vilnius, Lithuania, 25–27 June 2009; pp. 235–240. [Google Scholar]
- Aminu, M.; Matori, A.N.; Yusof, K.W.; Zainol, R.B. Application of Geographic Information System (GIS) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) for sustainable tourism planning in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Mech. Mater. 2014, 567, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marlina, E. Geotourism as a Strategy of Geosite Empowerment Towards the Tourism Sustainability in Gunungkidul Regency, Indonesia. Int. J. Smart Home 2016, 10, 131–148. [Google Scholar]
- Arsić, S.; Nikolić, D.; Živković, Ž. Hybrid SWOT-ANP-FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia. For. Policy Econ. 2017, 80, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrera, G.; Carrión, P.; Briones, J. Geotourism Potential in the Context of the Geopark Project for the Development of Santa Elena Province, Ecuador. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2018, 217, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tzeng, G.-H.; Huang, J.-J. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, 1st ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, NY, USA, 2011; 352p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Yang, T.; Huang, C.S.; Xu, C.Y.; Shao, Q.; Shi, P.; Wang, X.; Cui, T. An improved approach for water quality evaluation: TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking (TIWR) approach. Ecol. Ind. 2018, 89, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, C.L.; Yoon, K. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications a State-of-the-Art Survey; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981; pp. 58–191. [Google Scholar]
- Pourebrahim, S.; Hadipour, M.; Bin Mokhtar, M.; Taghavi, S. Application of VIKOR and fuzzy AHP for conservation priority assessment in coastal areas: Case of Khuzestan district, Iran. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2014, 98, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvandi, E.; Soleimani-Sardo, M.; Meshram, S.G.; Giglou, B.F.; Ghaleno, M.R.D. Using Improved TOPSIS and Best Worst Method in prioritizing management scenarios for the watershed management in arid and semi-arid environments. SoftComput. 2021, 25, 11363–11375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meshram, S.G.; Alvandi, E.; Meshram, C.; Kahya, E.; Al-Quraishi, A.M. Application of SAW and TOPSIS in prioritizing watersheds. Water Resour. Manag. 2020, 34, 715–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Wan, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W. Comprehensive ecological risk assessment for semi-arid basin based on conceptual model of risk response and improved TOPSIS model-a case study of Wei River Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 719, 137502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bognár, F.; Szentes, B.; Benedek, P. Development of the PRISM Risk Assessment Method Based on a Multiple AHP-TOPSIS Approach. Risks 2022, 10, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khazaei, M.; Hamzeh, S.; Samani, N.N.; Muhuri, A.; Goïta, K.; Weng, Q. A web-based system for satellite-based high-resolution global soil moisture maps. Comput. Geosci. 2023, 170, 105250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tullis, T.S.; Stetson, J.N. A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. UPA Present. 2004, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Brooke, J. SUS: A ’Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 1996, 189, 4–7. [Google Scholar]
- Wright, P.L.; Kroll, M.J.; Parnell, J.A. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- World Tourism Organization. A Practical Guide to Tourism Destination Management; World Tourism Organization: Madrid, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Ghaleno, M.R.D.; Meshram, S.G.; Alvandi, E. Pragmatic approach for prioritization of flood and sedimentation hazard potential of watersheds. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 15701–15714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binns, T.; Nel, E. Tourism as a local development strategy in South Africa. Geogr. J. 2002, 168, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrova, M.; Dekhtyar, N.; Klok, O.; Loseva, O. Regional tourism infrastructure development in the state strategies. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2018, 16, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arintoko, A.; Ahmad, A.A.; Gunawan, D.S.; Supadi, S. Community-based tourism village development strategies: A case of Borobudur tourism village area, Indonesia. Geo J. Tour. Geosites 2020, 29, 398–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azimovna, M.S.; Ilkhomovna, U.D.; Shokhrukhovich, U.F. Innovative Strategies of Tourism Development in Uzbekistan. Eur. J. Innov. Nonform. Educ. 2022, 2, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Wijaya, P.Y.; Kawiana, I.G.P.; Suasih, N.N.R.; Hartati, P.S.; Sumadi, N.K. SWOT and MICMAC analysis to determine the development strategy and sustainability of the Bongkasa Pertiwi Tourism Village, Bali Province, Indonesia. Decis. Sci. Lett. 2020, 9, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahlyiani, M.A.; Jokar, S. Codification appropriate strategies urban land using a combined model TOPSIS-SWOT. Geogr. Hum. Relatsh. 2019, 2, 349–368. [Google Scholar]
- Diaz, F.; Cilinskis, E. Use of Multi-Criteria TOPSIS Analysis to Define a Decarbonization Path in Colombia. RigasTeh. Univ. Zinat. Raksti 2019, 23, 110–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azimi, R.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Fouladgar, M.M.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Basiri, M.H. Ranking the strategies of mining sector through ANP and TOPSIS in a SWOT framework. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2011, 12, 670–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Strategy Levels | Stage | Description of Activities |
---|---|---|
Macro strategies | Start stage | - Determining vision and mission |
- Identifying and setting goals | ||
Input stage | - Examining internal factors and matrix formation (IFE) with coefficients and rankings | |
- Examining external factors and matrix formation (EFE) with coefficients and ranking | ||
Comparison stage | - Forming a matrix of threats, opportunities, strengths, and weaknesses (SWOT) | |
Decision stage | - Prioritizing strategies extracted using the TOPSIS method |
Row | Key External Factors | Importance Factor (from Zero to 1) | Score (from 1 to 4) | Final Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Opportunities | ||||
1 | Increasing the private sector’s willingness to participate in tourism-related initiatives and programs | 0.082 | 2.9 | 0.238 |
2 | Space for guests to utilize the lake and its diverse pools | 0.078 | 2.7 | 0.211 |
3 | People’s desire to maintain and utilize more of the lake’s natural and pristine environment | 0.076 | 2.7 | 0.205 |
4 | Increased popularity and internationalization of the West Lake | 0.09 | 3.5 | 0.315 |
5 | Increasing travel and recreation motivation among individuals, in the post-epidemic era | 0.087 | 3.1 | 0.27 |
6 | The 2022 Asian Games in Hangzhou are just around the corner | 0.088 | 3.3 | 0.29 |
Threats | ||||
1 | Escalating environmental issues attributable to tourism activity | 0.085 | 3.1 | 0.264 |
2 | Existence of competitive recreational and tourism areas in the vicinity and tourist appeal by other regions | 0.078 | 2.8 | 0.218 |
3 | Not adhering to health regulations and polluting lake water | 0.082 | 2.9 | 0.238 |
4 | Improper protection of the lake’s historical attractions | 0.077 | 2.7 | 0.208 |
5 | Excessive visitor traffic and environmental, health, and transportation stresses on popular tourism destinations | 0.088 | 3.1 | 0.273 |
6 | Tourism supply is insufficient, the target audience is single | 0.089 | 3.3 | 0.294 |
Total | 1 | 3.023 |
Row | Key Internal Factors | Importance Factor (from zero to 1) | Score (from 1 to 4) | Final Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Strengths | ||||
1 | Favorable weather with year-round accessibility | 0.079 | 3.3 | 0.261 |
2 | Existence of diverse tourism amenities on the lake’s coasts | 0.071 | 3 | 0.213 |
3 | The lake’s historical and cultural significance | 0.073 | 3.2 | 0.234 |
4 | Numerous sporting and amusement venues surrounding the lake | 0.065 | 3 | 0.195 |
5 | It is located in an attractive city with convenient transportation | 0.085 | 3.6 | 0.306 |
6 | Superior natural conditions of the area | 0.089 | 3.8 | 0.338 |
7 | The first 5A scenic spot open for free in China | 0.082 | 3.5 | 0.287 |
Weaknesses | ||||
1 | Absence of adequate frameworks for travelers’ optimal use of tourism resources, particularly in natural and protected regions | 0.074 | 3.3 | 0.244 |
2 | Tourists’ disregard for hygiene surrounding the lake | 0.071 | 3.2 | 0.227 |
3 | Seasonality of tourism demand | 0.067 | 3 | 0.201 |
4 | The scenery of the West Lake is seasonal | 0.081 | 3.5 | 0.284 |
5 | Aging tourism routes | 0.086 | 3.7 | 0.318 |
6 | Congestion at West Lake’ popular scenic spots | 0.077 | 3.4 | 0.262 |
Total | 1 | 3.369 |
Prioritizing Opportunities (O) | Rank | Prioritizing Threats (T) | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
Increased popularity and internationalization of the West Lake | 1 | Tourism supply is insufficient, the target audience is single | 1 |
The 2022 Asian Games in Hangzhou are just around the corner | 2 | Excessive visitor traffic and environmental, health, and transportation stresses on popular tourist destinations | 2 |
Increasing travel and recreation motivation among individuals in the post-epidemic era | 3 | Escalating environmental issues attributable to tourism activity | 3 |
Increasing the private sector’s willingness to participate in tourism-related initiatives and programs | 4 | Not adhering to health regulations and polluting lake water | 4 |
Space for guests to utilize the lake and its diverse pools | 5 | Existence of competitive recreational and tourism areas in the vicinity and tourist appeal of other regions | 5 |
People’s desire to maintain and utilize more of the lake’s natural and pristine environment | 6 | Improper protection of the lake’s historical attractions | 6 |
Prioritizing Strengths (S) | Rank | Prioritizing Weaknesses (W) | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
Superior natural conditions of the area | 1 | Aging tourism routes | 1 |
It is located in an attractive city with convenient transportation | 2 | The scenery of the West Lake is seasonal | 2 |
The first 5A scenic spot open for free in China | 3 | Congestion at West Lake’ popular scenic spots | 3 |
Favorable weather with year-round accessibility | 4 | Absence of adequate frameworks for travelers’ optimal use of tourism resources, particularly in natural and protected regions | 4 |
The lake’s historical and cultural significance | 5 | Tourists’ disregard for hygiene surrounding the lake | 5 |
Existence of diverse tourism amenities on the lake’s coasts | 6 | Seasonality of tourism demand | 6 |
Numerous sporting and amusement venues surrounding the lake | 7 | ----- | --- |
Row | Internal and External Factors | Experts |
---|---|---|
1 | Threats | 0.249 |
2 | Opportunities | 0.255 |
3 | Weaknesses | 0.256 |
4 | Strengths | 0.262 |
Threats | Opportunities | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|
C = 0.50 | C = 0.52 | C = 0.57 | C = 0.53 |
Strengths (S) | Weaknesses (W) | |
---|---|---|
Opportunities (O) | SO strategies SO1. Utilizing the lake’s unique location for cross-border tourism development SO2. Optimal utilization of the lake’s natural, cultural, and historical potential and attractions in order to develop and attract tourists and generate jobs and revenues SO3. Improving collaboration between relevant groups and authorities to combine the lake’s capabilities SO4. Planning to use the tourism capacity of the 2022 Asian Games in Hangzhou, due to the superior cultural, historical, and natural features of the lake SO5. Emphasis on the promotion of ecotourism given the region’s capacity. | WO strategies WO1. Review of the integrated management system and selection of a unified management approach to create and promote sustainable tourism objectives WO2. Utilizing the capabilities and resources of the private sector to enhance the lake’s aging tourism routes WO3. Quantitative and qualitative enhancement of service and welfare facilities in accordance with the natural environment of the region WO4. Implementation of programs to eliminate poverty and unemployment through local community empowerment and self-assurance. |
Threats (T) | ST strategies ST1. Determining the ecological tolerance capacity and preventing the overexploitation of the natural environments of the lake by tourists ST2. Formulation of strategic plans to maximize potential and opportunities in order to attract tourists in all seasons of the year ST3. Establishing winter and summer tourism hubs to attract tourists throughout the year. | WT strategies WT1. Developing a strategic environmental plan to manage all sorts of pollution and environmental destruction WT2. Educating visitors on how to maximize the lake’s capabilities and prevent its contamination WT3. Training professionals to introduce the lake's capabilities for tourists. |
Row | Strategic Factors | Symbol | Score | Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Utilizing the lake’s unique location for cross-border tourism development | SO1 | 0.519 | 5 |
2 | Optimal utilization of the lake’s natural, cultural, and historical potential and attractions in order to develop and attract tourists and generate jobs and revenues | SO2 | 0.583 | 1 |
3 | Improving collaboration between relevant groups and authorities to combine the lake's capabilities | SO3 | 0.401 | 12 |
4 | Planning to use the tourism capacity of the 2022 Asian Games in Hangzhou, due to the superior cultural, historical and natural features of the lake | SO4 | 0.554 | 3 |
5 | Emphasis on the promotion of ecotourism given the region’s capacity | SO5 | 0.461 | 9 |
6 | Review of the integrated management system and selection of a unified management approach to create and promote sustainable tourism objectives | WO1 | 0.394 | 13 |
7 | Utilizing the capabilities and resources of the private sector to enhance the lake’s aging tourism routes | WO2 | 0.548 | 4 |
8 | Quantitative and qualitative enhancement of service and welfare facilities in accordance with the natural environment of the region | WO3 | 0.479 | 8 |
9 | Implementation of programs to eliminate poverty and unemployment through local community empowerment and self-assurance | WO4 | 0.412 | 11 |
10 | Determining the ecological tolerance capacity and preventing the overexploitation of the natural environments of the lake by tourists | ST1 | 0.494 | 6 |
11 | Formulation of strategic plans to maximize potential and opportunities in order to attract tourists in all seasons of the year | ST2 | 0.571 | 2 |
12 | Establishing winter and summer tourism hubs to attract tourists throughout the year | ST3 | 0.439 | 10 |
13 | Developing a strategic environmental plan to manage all sorts of pollution and environmental destruction | WT1 | 0.486 | 7 |
14 | Educating visitors on how to maximize the lake’s capabilities and preventing its contamination | WT2 | 0.367 | 15 |
15 | Training professionals to introduce the lake’s capabilities for tourists | WT3 | 0.381 | 14 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhu, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, G.; Lin, Z.; Meshram, S.G.; Alvandi, E. Investigation of West Lake Ecotourism Capabilities Using SWOT and TOPSIS Decision-Making Methods. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2464. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15032464
Zhu Y, Chen C, Zhang G, Lin Z, Meshram SG, Alvandi E. Investigation of West Lake Ecotourism Capabilities Using SWOT and TOPSIS Decision-Making Methods. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):2464. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15032464
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhu, Yihao, Chou Chen, Guodao Zhang, Zimin Lin, Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram, and Ehsan Alvandi. 2023. "Investigation of West Lake Ecotourism Capabilities Using SWOT and TOPSIS Decision-Making Methods" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 2464. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su15032464