Next Article in Journal
The Role of Indicator-Based Sustainability Assessment in Policy and the Decision-Making Process: A Review and Outlook
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability Experiments in the Agri-Food System: Uncovering the Factors of New Governance and Collaboration Success
Article

Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates

Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
Academic Editor: Vincenzo Torretta
Sustainability 2017, 9(6), 1031; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su9061031
Received: 24 May 2017 / Revised: 8 June 2017 / Accepted: 12 June 2017 / Published: 15 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
Over the last decade, bioeconomy policies, guided by integrated bioeconomy strategies, have developed. This paper presents a systematic and comparative analysis of official bioeconomy strategies of the EU, Germany, OECD, Sweden and the USA with regard to their context, visions and guiding implementation principles. In an additional step, the relationship between these strategies and important scientific and societal debates around bioeconomy is assessed. In conclusion, five major stumbling blocks for the further development of the bioeconomy are worked out. First, there is the risk of disappointment because far-reaching promises of the strategies are difficult to achieve. Second, the bioeconomy is not the only way to a low carbon economy so alternatives could impede the desired development. Third, persistent conflicts between the different uses of biomass for food, material and energy production could lead to unstable policy support with short-term shifts. Fourth, a broader success of new bioeconomy value chains could trigger new societal conflicts over bioeconomy if efficiency gains, cascading use, residue use and sustainability certification are not sufficient to ensure a sustainable supply of biomass. Fifth, the acceptance of bioeconomy could be compromised if bioeconomy policies continue to ignore the on-going societal debates on agriculture and food. View Full-Text
Keywords: bioeconomy; bio-based economy; strategies; visions; transformation; sustainability; biomass; vision assessment bioeconomy; bio-based economy; strategies; visions; transformation; sustainability; biomass; vision assessment
MDPI and ACS Style

Meyer, R. Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1031. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su9061031

AMA Style

Meyer R. Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates. Sustainability. 2017; 9(6):1031. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su9061031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meyer, Rolf. 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates" Sustainability 9, no. 6: 1031. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su9061031

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop