Next Article in Journal
A New Method for Extraction and Analysis of Ricin Samples through MALDI-TOF-MS/MS
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Modified Hydrated Sodium Calcium Aluminosilicate (HSCAS) Adsorbent Can Effectively Reduce T-2 Toxin-Induced Toxicity in Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Serum Biochemistry, and Small Intestinal Morphology in Chicks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/toxins11040200
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Natural Variation of Fumonisin Gene Cluster Associated with Fumonisin Production Difference in Fusarium fujikuroi

by
Sharmin Sultana
1,
Miha Kitajima
2,
Hironori Kobayashi
2,
Hiroyuki Nakagawa
3,
Masafumi Shimizu
2,
Koji Kageyama
4 and
Haruhisa Suga
5,*
1
The United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
2
Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
3
Faculty of National Food Research Institute, NARO, Tsukuba 305-8642, Japan
4
River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
5
Life Science Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2019, 11(4), 200; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins11040200
Submission received: 12 February 2019 / Revised: 14 March 2019 / Accepted: 21 March 2019 / Published: 3 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Mycotoxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fusarium fujikuroi, a member of the Fusarium fujikuroi species complex, stands out as a rice bakanae disease pathogen with a high production of gibberellic acid. Not all, but some F. fujikuroi strains are known to produce a carcinogenic mycotoxin fumonisin. Fumonisin biosynthesis is dependent on the FUM cluster composed of 16 FUM genes. The FUM cluster was detected not only from a fumonisin producing strain, but also from a fumonisin nonproducing strain that does not produce a detectable level of fumonisin. Genetic mapping indicated the causative mutation(s) of fumonisin nonproduction is present in the FUM cluster of the fumonisin nonproducing strain. Comparative analyses of FUM genes between the fumonisin producing and the nonproducing strains and gene complementation indicated that causative mutation of fumonisin nonproduction is not a single occurrence and the mutations are distributed in FUM21 and FUM7. Our research revealed a natural variation in the FUM cluster involving fumonisin production difference in F. fujikuroi.
Keywords:
rice bakanae; polyketide mycotoxin; gene diversity; transcriptional regulator; pre-termination
Key Contribution: Fumonisin is one of the acute mycotoxins that poses a significant risk to food safety. Fusarium fujikuroi has been isolated from various crops and is subclassified as an F-group that produces fumonisin and a G-group that does not produce a detectable level of fumonisin. In this study, we clarified the mutations that cause fumonisin nonproduction in a G-group strain. Understanding of fumonisin producibility of F. fujikuroi at a genetic level provides an accurate assessment of fumonisin contamination risk by this fungus.

1. Introduction

Fusarium fujikuroi, a member of the Fusarium fujikuroi species complex (Ff complex), causes rice bakanae disease by high production of gibberellin in a plant. Beside gibberellin, F. fujikuroi is known to produce other secondary metabolites such as fumonisin, moniliformin, fusarins, fusaric acid, and beauvericin [1,2]. Fumonisin is a carcinogenic mycotoxin, and its production has been detected from 15 species of Ff complex [1,3,4,5] and Aspergillus niger [6].
Fumonisin causes various kinds of diseases such as leukoencephalomalacia in horses [7], pulmonary edema in swine [8], and possibly human esophageal cancer [9] and neural tube defects [10]. Fumonisins are also phytotoxic by inhibiting acyl CoA-dependent ceramide synthase in plant cells [11]. The most abundant naturally occurring fumonsin is FB1 [12].
Fusarium proliferatum and F. fujikuroi are considered potential fumonisin producers in rice [13] and are the most closely related species. They infrequently produce interspecific hybrids, but most of the natural isolates can be differentiated by molecular markers and chemotaxonomic criteria [14,15]. A majority of strains in F. proliferatum produce fumonisin, while fumonisin production has been detected only in partial strains of F. fujikuroi. Most especially, frequency of fumonisin production of F. fujikuroi from rice is comparatively low: 13 out of 31 strains (41.9%) from rice in the Philippines [13], 27 out of 38 strains (71.0%) from rice in Korea [16], and 33 out of 66 strains (50.0%) from rice in Japan [17]. Only a small amount of fumonisin was detected in a F. fujikuroi strain IMI58289 from rice in Taiwan, and gibberellin production of that strain has been intensively studied [18]. Recently, it was revealed that fumonisin producing strains and nonproducing strains in F. fujikuroi are phylogenetically different [19,20]. Suga et al. [19] designated fumonisin producer as F-group and nonproducer as G-group. It was demonstrated that G-group has higher gibberellin producibility than F-group and showed typical bakanae symptoms [19].
F. fujikuroi was the most frequent isolate in rice from 10 Asian countries [21]. Fumonisins have been found as common contaminants in maize-based foods and feed in the United States of America, China, Europe, South America, and Africa [22,23,24,25]. The frequency and production level of fumonisin in F. fujikuroi are varied in the previous publication [13,16,26]. Bolton et al. [26] detected 0.9–2403 ppm FB1 in 50 grape isolates with rice culturing for seven days at 27 °C. Cruz et al. [13] detected 0.4–224 ppm FB1 in 18 out of 31 rice isolates by culturing with fumonisin-inducing liquid medium for 7 days at 20 °C. Lee et al. [16] detected 0.5–12.9 ppm FB1 in 11 corn isolates by rice culturing. Various production level of fumonisin is partly attributed to a different assay method and different growth media used in the individual investigations. Therefore, direct comparisons among previous publications are difficult. However, the possibility of fumonisin production difference in F. fujikuroi from different crops have been implicated [19,20].
Fumonisin biosynthetic gene (FUM) cluster consisting of 16 FUM genes spanning 50 kbp in the genome were revealed on Fusarium verticillioides as a member of Ff complex [27]. The FUM genes were detected from both fumonisin producing and nonproducing F. fujikuroi strains [20]. The fumonisin biosynthesis starts with a polyketide synthesis by FUM1. Subsequently, it was modified by other genes: FUM6, FUM7, FUM8, FUM3, FUM10, FUM11, FUM2, FUM13, FUM14, and FUM15 (Table 1). Additional FUM16, FUM17, FUM18, and FUM19 were recognized as FUM genes based on their colocation and coregulation with other FUM genes [27,28], though disruption of each gene did not alter fumonisin production [28,29]. FUM21 encodes a Zn(II)-2Cys6 DNA binding transcription factor that positively regulates other FUM gene expressions [30]. FUM21 disruption lacked FUM1 and FUM8 expression at least in F. verticillioides and failed to produce FB1 [30]. Information of the gene polymorphisms affecting fumonisin producibility is important for accurately assessing the fumonisin production risk of F. fujikuroi. It was revealed that a low level of expression of FUM21 is the cause of low fumonisin production in the F. fujikuroi strain IMI58289 [18]. However, the causative mutation of fumonisin nonproduction may be varied in F. fujikuroi, as a large deletion in the FUM cluster was reported in Fusarium musae (previous F. verticillioides) [31]. A partial deletion of FUM cluster was also reported in F. fujikuroi strain FGSC8932, though its fumonisin production has not been investigated [32]. In this study, we revealed a new type of causative mutation of fumonisin nonproduction in F. fujikuroi. The cause is not a single mutation and the causes are distributed in FUM21 and FUM7 in the FUM cluster.

2. Results

2.1. Linkage Analysis of Fumonisin Nonproduction

In total, 100 progenies were obtained from crossing between fumonisin producer Gfc0825009 (G9) and nonproducer Gfc0801001 (G1) (Table S1). Five SNP markers including FUM1_G423A and FUM18_G51T in the FUM cluster [19], and MAT types were used for linkage analysis. Fifty-eight progenies showed identical haplotypes with either of the parental strains and were considered as possibly conidially derived colonies. The remaining 42 progenies showed a different haplotype from the parental strains and were considered true progenies. Twenty-four and 18 progenies were fumonisin producers and nonproducers, respectively. All fumonisin producers showed G9 type and all fumonisin nonproducer showed G1 types in FUM1-G423A and FUM18-G51T markers. These results suggested that the causative mutation of fumonisin nonproducibility in G1 strain is present in the FUM cluster.

2.2. Sequence Comparison of the FUM Cluster

The FUM cluster of G1 and G9 strains was sequenced and the FUM genes were compared (Figure S1, Table 1). The distribution and the direction of FUM genes in G1 strains were the same as in G9 strain. High homology was observed in the nucleotide (98.2–99.6%) and the amino acid (97.5–99.8%) sequences though FUM17 could not be compared because pre-termination was observed in both strains (Table 1). It was impossible to identify the causative mutations of fumonisin nonproduction from sequence comparison although some amino acid substitutions, insertions, and deletions were detected in G1 strain (Table 1).

2.3. FUM Gene Expression

Expression of FUM21, FUM1, FUM6, FUM8, and FUM10 in G1 and G9 strains were investigated by RT-PCR. The expected size of DNA (Table S2) was detected in all genes of G9 strain while it was detected only in FUM21 and FUM1 of G1 strain (Figure 1). RT-PCR was conducted in triplicate culturing and the results were same. These results suggested that some of the essential FUM genes are not transcribed in G1 strain under fumonisin production conditions.

2.4. Fumonisin Production Recovery by Gene Complementation

Failure of detection of RT-PCR product from plural FUM genes suggested that FUM21 encoding a transcription factor may be defective in G1 strain, although its RT-PCR product was detected (Figure 1). One amino acid substitution (p.D261H) and a pre-termination (p.G678*) that lacks 11 amino acids at C-terminal of FUM21 were present in G1 strain (Figure 2 and Table 1). We assumed that these mutations dysfunction FUM21 in G1 strain, and it was conducted that FUM21 of G9 strain was transformed into G1 strain (FfT21FUMKOD in Figure 3). Ten transformants were created, and full-length integration of the T21 fragment that contained FUM21 and its flanking region was confirmed by PCR (Figure S2). In addition, RT-PCR showed the positive conversion of FUM6, FUM8, and FUM10 expression in a transformant, FfT21FUMKOD (#2) (Figure 1). However, fumonisin production recovery was not observed in all transformants (FfT21FUMKOD in Figure 3). Complement transformants were further created in G1 strain with T1 (containing FUM1), T67 (containing FUM6 and FUM7), T8310 (containing FUM8 to FUM10 region), and T141516 (containing FUM14 to FUM16 region) fragment from G9 strain, but fumonisin production recovery was observed in none of them (Figure 3). Fumonisin production recovery was also not observed in simultaneous transformants with T67 and T831011213 (Figure 3). However, fumonisin production was detected in simultaneous transformants with T21, T67, and T831011213 (FfDTFUM21_6_13 in Figure 3 and Table 2). These results suggested that causative mutations of fumonisin nonproduction in G1 strain are distributed in T21, T67, and T831011213 regions. In order to narrow the regions of mutation(s), simultaneous transformations in T21 and T67 regions were conducted in G1 strain. Although fumonisin production had not been recovered with either of T21 or T67 (FfT21FUMKOD and FfT67FUMKOD in Figure 3), it was recovered with the simultaneous transformations with these (FfT67T21FUMKOD2 and FfDT21T67KOD in Figure 3).
To specify the location of the causative mutation(s) in T67 region, plasmid carrying FUM6 (pBSNT67046T-3 in Table S3) or FUM7 (pBSNT67141A-3 in Table S3) was created by frameshift of either of FUM6 or FUM7 in the plasmid carrying T67 fragment (pCBT67KOD-1) (Table S3) and transformed into FfT21FUMKOD (#2), which is a transformant with T21 (FfT6TT21FUMKOD2 and FfT7AT21FUMKOD2 in Figure 3). Fumonisin production was recovered in FfT7AT21FUMKOD2 transformants (Figure 3 and Table 2). These results suggested that mutations causing fumonisin nonproduction in G1 strain were distributed in FUM21 and FUM7. Sequence comparison between G1 and G9 strain indicated that three amino acid substitutions are present in FUM7 (Figure S3) and two nucleotide substitutions in the intergenic region (possible bidirectional promoter region) between FUM6 and FUM7 (Figure S4).

2.5. Causative Mutation in FUM21

It was assumed that the causative mutation of FUM21 in G1 strain is either that of g.888G>C (p.D261H) or g.2551G>T (p.G678*). In order to identify it, the transformation plasmid that carries a point mutation at g.888G>C (p.D261H) or g.2551G>T (p.G678*) in FUM21 of G9 strain was created (pDT21G888C-1 and pDT21G2551T-2 in Table S3). Each plasmid was transformed into FfT67831011213 (#30), which is a simultaneous transformant with T67 and T831011213. The created transformants were FfDTFUM21G888C-6-13 and FfDTFUM21G2551T-6-13 (Figure 3). Fumonisin production was not recovered in all 22 FfDTFUM21G2551T-6-13 transformants (Figure 3 and Table 2), while it was recovered in five out of 18 FfDTFUM21G888C-6-13 transformants (Figure 3 and Table 2). Failure of fumonisin production recovery with pDT21G2551T may attribute partial integration of T21 rather than g.2551G>T substitution. Therefore, PCR detection of T21 was conducted and full-length integration was confirmed in 13 out of 22 FfDTFUM21G2551T-6-13 transformants and five out of 18 FfDTFUM21G888C-6-13 transformants. Expression of FUM21 and FUM8 in a representative transformant were investigated. FUM8 was not expressed in FfDTFUM21G2551T-6-13(#1), whereas it was expressed in FfDTFUM21G888C-6-13(#5). These results suggested that g.2551G>T (p.G678*) (Figure 2) in FUM21 is the cause of fumonisin nonproduction though additional mutation(s) is/are present in T7 regions in G1 strain.
We sequenced the terminal portion of FUM21 in an additional three fumonisin nonproducing strains (GL-24, Gfc0625008 and Gfc1034001) and three fumonisin producing strains (Gfc0821004, Gfc0009063 and 41-79) that were used in the previous study [17] to investigate the g.2551G>T. Three fumonisin nonproducing strains had T as G1 strain while three fumonisin producing strains had G at the site (Table S4). We also checked the g.2551G>T in nine F. fujikuroi strains, the whole genome sequences that was investigated [20]. One of the nine strains (B14) is an apparent fumonisin producer, and the other strains are fumonisin non- or low-producers [20]. B14 strain has G at the site. In case of fumonisin non or low producers, four strains have T and four strains including IMI58289 have G at the site (Table S4).

3. Discussion

A precise understanding of mycotoxin producibility of fungal species is important to clarify its mycotoxin contamination risks. Fumonisin is one of the most potent mycotoxins responsible for food safety. Rice is major grain providing food for the world population and, therefore, fumonisin producibility of rice infecting fungus, F. fujikuroi, is a crucial risk. In order to scrutinize fumonisin producibility of F. fujikuroi G-group strains at the gene level, the causative mutations of fumonisin nonproduction in G1 strain was clarified in this study.
G1 strain carries a FUM cluster as fumonisin producing G9 strain, though FUM17 is a pseudo gene in both G1 and G9 strains, as it was previously reported in the F. fujikuroi strain IMI58289 [33]. FUM16 may complement FUM17 function because both genes have sequence similarity to tomato longevity assurance factor (ASC-1) of Alternaria alternata f. sp lycopersici and FUM16 disruption did not affect fumonisin producibility in F. verticillioides [28]. High-sequence homology was observed in FUM genes between G1 and G9 strains (Table 1), such as an aflatoxin biosynthetic gene cluster between aflatoxin producers Aspergillus parasiticus or Aspergillus flavus and nonproducer Aspergillus oryzae RIB40 [34]. Among 16 FUM genes, a comparatively higher number of amino acid substitutions were observed in FUM16, FUM18 and FUM19 (Table 1) which are known to be not essential for fumonisin production by gene disruption studies [28,29]. In consideration of co-localization of these FUM genes in the FUM cluster, the origin of essential FUM gene regions and non-essential may be different.
The dysfunction of a transcription factor is one of the possible mechanisms of mycotoxin nonproduction [30]. Pre-termination of ORF was observed in the transcription factor (aflR gene) of Aspergillus sojae. This mutation causes aflatoxin nonproduction by the dysfunction of the protein with the deletion of 62 amino acids in the respective gene product [35]. FUM21 encodes a positive transcriptional regulator of other FUM genes. FUM21 is a GAL4 type zinc finger protein [29], a C-terminal region that is thought to be critical for transcriptional activation [36]. The g.2551G>T (p.G678*) in FUM21 was identified as one of the causative mutations of fumonisin nonproduction in G1 strain. This mutation lacks 11 amino acids at C-terminal of FUM21 and, presumably, it is dysfunctional because positive conversion of FUM6, FUM8, and FUM10 expressions was observed in FUM21 complemented transformant (FfT21FUMKOD (#2) in Figure 1).
F. fujikuroi IMI58289 strain is a fumonisin low producer [18,20]. This strain does not have the g.2551G>T (p.G678*) substitution in FUM21 (FFUJ-09241) and, therefore, retains the normal C-terminal of FUM21. Instead, the low level of FUM21 expression was revealed as only the cause of fumonisin low-production in IMI58289 strain [18]. On the other hand, failure of fumonisin production recovery by FUM21 complementation in G1 strain suggested that additional cause of fumonisin nonproduction is present in this strain. The successful fumonisin production recovery by the simultaneous complementation of FUM21 and FUM7 indicated that the additional mutation(s) is present in FUM7 encoding alcohol dehydrogenases. Similarly, multiple mutations in the biosynthetic gene cluster of secondary metabolites were reported on aflatoxin and gibberellin nonproduction in A. oryzae and F. proliferatum, respectively [34,37,38]. Comparing to G9 strain, three amino acid substitutions in FUM7 and 2 nucleotide substitutions in the putative bidirectional promoter between FUM6 and FUM7 were detected in G1 strain (Figures S3 and S4). These substitutions might be the cause of the dysfunctionality of FUM7 in G1 strain.
We detected the mutations in FUM21 and FUM7 that affect fumonisin production in G1 strain but further mutation(s) could be present in the FUM cluster of G1 because the level of fumonisin production recovery in FfDT21T67FUMKOD, FfDT67T21FUMKOD2, and FfT7AT21FUMKOD2 (Table 2) were greatly lower than FfDTFUM21_6_13.
We investigated the cause of fumonisin nonproduction in G1 strain. However, the causative mutation of fumonisin nonproduction may be varied in F. fujikuroi. A partial deletion of FUM cluster was reported in F. fujikuroi strain FGSC8932, though its fumonisin production has not been investigated [32]. Suga et al. [19] failed PCR amplification of a region in FUM18 in three out of the five G-group strains and, therefore, this region may be absent in these strains. Further study would reveal the variation of causative mutations of fumonisin nonproduction in F. fujikuroi.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Fungal Strains

Fusarium fujikuroi strains, fumonisin production of that was investigated in the previous report were used [17]. G9 from maize, Gfc0821004 from rice seed, Gfc0009063 from strawberry, and 41-79 from wheat were fumonisin producers and G1, Gfc0625008, Gfc1034001, and GL24, were from rice and were fumonisin nonproducers. GL24 and 41-79 were from the US and the remaining strains were from Japan.

4.2. Crossing

Five pieces of 5 cm rice straw were put in a 200 mL beaker with a lid of aluminum foil and sterilized by autoclave. A fumonisin producer G9 (MAT1-1 type) and a nonproducer G1 (MAT1-2 type) were transplanted to the center of a piece and incubated for one week at 25 °C with a lid of aluminum foil/parafilm under the mixture light of black and white fluorescent. Shallow sterile water was poured into a beaker and was removed the next day. The perithecia that developed in two weeks was thoroughly rinsed by sterile water. A cover glass was placed on a perithecium on a glass slide and the perithecium was crushed with a little pressure. Ascospores were collected by several hundred μL of sterile water and spread to a minimal medium containing 0.05% (vol/vol) tergitol type NP-10 and 2% (wt/vol) L-sorbose instead of 3% sucrose (MMTS medium) [39]. Progenies were maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) after single-spore isolation and kept at 6 °C for short-term storage and at −80 °C in 50% glycerol for long-term storage.

4.3. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from 3–4 day old mycelium (2–3 cm diameter) cultured on potato dextrose broth (PDB) by using potassium ethyl xanthogenate solution, as previously described [40]. The final DNA pellet was dissolved in 200 μL of water, and 5 ng/μL was used for PCR.

4.4. SNP Analysis by Luminex and MAT Typing

A multiplex PCR was performed to prepare template DNA for allele-specific primer extension (ASPE) reactions. The PCR for TEF and FUM amplification was set up with 0.025 units rTaq polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan) in a 10 μL reaction mixture, containing 1× reaction buffer, 200 μM dNTPs, 1 μM of each HS438 and HS439 primer [17] (Table S5), and 0.5 μM of each HS398, HS399, HS506, and HS519 primer (Table S5) and 5 ng genomic DNA. The PCR for CPR and P450-4 amplification were similarly setup but contained 1 μM of each P138-5, HS556, HSP450-4-GD1, and P450-4-GD2 primer [19,37,41] (Table S5). PCR was performed in an iCycler thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories), using the following cycling parameters: 94 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. Each 2.5 μL PCR mixture of TEF/FUM, and CPR/P450-4, 0.2 μL ExoSAP-IT (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden), and 1.8 μL water were mixed and kept at 37 °C for 30 min and then 80 °C for 15 min. ASPE reactions were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using Platinum Genotype Tsp DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), HS641, HS642, HS540, HS541, HS542, HS543, HS557, HS558, HS559, and HS560 primer (Table S5) in 20 μL volume but with extension step at 50 °C for 1 min. Biotin labelled products were sorted by hybridization with polystyrene microspheres coated with anti-tag sequences: LUA-12, -65, -67, -76, -87, -97, -16, -28, -2, and -14. Hybridizations were performed in 45 μL volumes with 1×Tm hybridization buffer (0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris, 0.08% Triton X-100), along with pH 8.0 including 20 μL of extension product. The samples were incubated for 90 s at 96 °C, followed by 30 min at 37 °C, and then transferred to a 96-well filtration plate (Multi Screen HTS; Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA, USA). Liquid was removed by a vacuum manifold and then adding 100 μL of 1×Tm hybridization buffer was repeated twice and again liquid was removed by a vacuum manifold. Microspheres were resuspended in a 100 μL of 1×Tm hybridization buffer containing 2 μg/mL streptavidin-R-phycoerythin (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 100 microspheres was measured with a Luminex 100 flow cytometer (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA) after incubation for 15 min at 37 °C. More than 100 MFI value after subtraction of background of MFI value obtained by water instead of extension product was used for SNP determination. SNP was determined based on the ratio with more than twice the MFI value between the paired microspheres corresponding to SNP: LUA-12/-65, -67/-76, -87/-97, -16/-28, and -2/-14.
The mating type was determined by PCR with the primer fusALPHAfor and fusALPHArev for MAT1-1, and fusHMGfor and fusHMGrev for MAT1-2 [42].

4.5. PCR and Sequencing

PCR was performed by either an iCycler or T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Hercules, CA, USA). A to J regions in a FUM cluster of G9 strain (Figure S1) was amplified by PCR using AccuTaq LA DNA Polymerase (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) with the following cycling parameters: 94 °C for 30 s, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, annealing temperature for 20 s, and 68 °C for 8 min. Annealing temperature was 48 °C for A, E, F, and J regions and 56 °C for B, C, D, G, H, and I regions. The primer pairs were shown in Table S6. Flanking region (Figure S1) was amplified by dual-suppression-PCR with the primer shown in Table S6 [43] because the whole genome sequence of F. fujikuroi had not been published at that time [33]. Genomic DNA digested with each of the blunt-end restriction endonucleases Hae III, EcoR V, and Alu V (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA) were used for dual-suppression-PCR because their recognition sites are not present in the nucleotide sequence between IP1 primer (Table S6) and the known terminal nucleotide. DNA Ligation Kit Ver. 2 (Takara) was used for the ligation of the adaptor that prepared with HS470 and HS471 (Table S6) to the genomic DNA digested by the restriction endonuclease. IP1/AP1 primers were used for the first PCR and IP2/AP2 primers were used for the nested PCR by AccuTaq LA DNA Polymerase (Sigma). Ca. 1000 bp-DNA was amplified from EcoR V digested genomic DNA and it was used for direct sequencing with IP2 and AP2 primer (Table S6). K to R regions in a FUM cluster of G1 strain (Figure S1) was amplified by PCR with the same conditions except for annealing temperature at 52 °C and 68 °C for 10 min. PCR products were directly sequenced as previously described [40]. Big Dye Terminator V3.1 with cycle sequencing kits (Life Technologies) using the primers shown in Table S6, and the sequence was obtained by an ABI 3100 genetic analyzer (Life Technologies). PCR product of A region amplified with HS399 and HS487 primer was failed to be sequenced by these primers and it was assumed that PCR product had HS399 sequence at both terminals. Then, PCR product was cloned into pCR4-TOPO (Invitrogen) and terminal regions were sequenced with M13M4 and M13RV primer (Table S6). Nucleotide sequences data was processed with Chromas Pro (Technelysium Pty., Tewantin, Queensland, Australia) and Genetyx (Genetyx, Tokyo, Japan). Sequences of FUM cluster of G9 and G1 strains were available in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank database with accession numbers HQ622717 and JN807324, respectively.
An SNP at 2551st in FUM21 of the strains except for G9 and G1 was determined by direct sequencing of the PCR products amplified using the HS744 primer (5′-ATACTGCTGCCATTACGCAA-3′) and HS561 (Table S6). PCR was performed using KOD-Plus-Neo DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan) with the following cycling parameters: 94 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 61 °C for 20 s, and 68 °C for 3 min. The SNP of F. fujikuroi strains in [20] were obtained from the BioProject PRJEB14872 (ID: 412609) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
Integration of T21 fragment into the transformants was confirmed by PCR of 6 kbp-DNA using Accu Taq LA DNA Polymerase (Sigma), M13M4 primer and HS685 (5′-ATGCGGCCGCTCCTCCACCAGATGATGACA-3′) with the following cycling parameters: 94 °C for 30 s, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, 54 °C for 20 s, and 68 °C for 7 min.

4.6. Construction of the Transformation Vector

A part of a FUM cluster was amplified from G9 strain by PCR using the primer pairs shown in Table S3. PCR products treated with Not I (New England Biolabs) were inserted into the Not I site in pCB1004 [44], pDNAT1 [45] or pBSNII99-3 to create transformation vectors using DNA Ligation Kit Ver. 2 (Takara) (Table S3). pBSNII99-3 was created by the insertion of the geneticin resistance cassette that was cut out with Eco RV from pBS99 into Nae I site of pBluescript II KS (+) (Agilent Technologies). pBS99 was created by the geneticin resistance cassette from pII99 [46]. The geneticin resistance cassette in pII99 was cut out with Bgl II and Xba I though Xba I terminal was blunted before Bgl II digestion. pBS99 was created by the insertion of this geneticin resistance cassette at Bam HI and Sma I site of pBluescript II KS (+). Inserted DNA in the plasmid except for pDT21-1 was confirmed by sequencing with M13M4 and M13RV primers. Inserted DNA in pDT21-1 was confirmed by sequencing with HS743 (5′-TCTACATGAGCATGCCCTGCCCCTGAGGGCCC-3′) and M13M4 primers. pDT21G888C-1 with G to C substitution at the 888th nucleotide in FUM21 and pDT21G2551T-2 with G to T substitution at the 2551st nucleotide in FUM21 were created from pDT21-1 by QuickChange II XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) with HS748/HS749 primer and HS746/HS477 primer, respectively (Table S3). The nucleotide substitution in pDT21G888C-1 was confirmed by sequencing with HS744 primer (5′-ATACTGCTGCCATTACGCAA-3′). The nucleotide sequence of inserted T21 including the nucleotide substitution in pDT21G2551T-2 was confirmed by sequencing with primer HS608, HS618, HS622, HS617, HS607, HS599, HS585, HS489, HS561, HS562, M13M4 (Table S6), and HS743.
Dysfunction of FUM7 or FUM6 in pBSNT67-1 was attained by the frameshift with a nucleotide insertion. pBSNT67046T-3 with T insertion between 46/47th nucleotide in FUM7 and pBSNT67141A-3 with A insertion between 141/142th nucleotide in FUM6 were created from pBSNT67-1 by QuickChange II XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) with HS949/HS950 primer and HS947/HS948 primer, respectively (Table S3). The nucleotide insertion in pBSNT67046T-3 and pBSNT67141A-3 was confirmed by sequencing with HS533 and HS494 primer, respectively (Table S6).

4.7. Fungal Transformation

The fungal transformation was performed according to [47], but PDB instead of mung bean liquid media was used for producing budding cells. One percent water agar containing 250 μg of hygromycin B (Wako, Osaka, Japan)/mL, 800 μg of nourseothricin (Axxora, San Diego, CA, USA)/mL, or 450 μg of geneticin (G418 disulfate salt, Sigma)/mL was used for selection of transformant-colonies. The transformants created in this study were shown in Table S7.

4.8. RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from mycelium cultured in GYAM (8.0 mM L-asparagine, 1.7 mM NaCl, 4.4 mM K2HPO4, 2.0 mM MgSO4, 8.8 mM CaCl2, 0.05% yeast extract, 0.24 M glucose, 5.0 mM malic acid) [27,48] for seven days. The Maxwell RSC and The Simply RNA Tissue kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) were used for RNA extraction. RT-PCR was performed with a Titan One Tube RT-PCR Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) with the primer pair shown in Table S2 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR except for FUM8 was performed in a T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) using the following cycling parameters: 45 °C for 30 min and 94 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 10 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 68 °C for 1 min. In the case of FUM8, the cycle number was 35 and the annealing temperature was 51 °C instead of 58 °C.

4.9. Fumonisin Analysis

Strains or transformants were cultured on a 5 g cracked maize seed which included 2 mL of water at 25 °C for 10 days. Fumonisins were extracted with 25 mL of methanol/water (3:1, v/v) by reciprocal shaking for 30 min. One hundred μL of extract was used for a competitive enzyme immunoassay, RIDASCREEN®FAST Fumonisin kit (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) after dilution 14 times with water according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fumonisin concentration higher than 0.222 μg/gram was considered as fumonisin production positive. In case the transformant with fumonisin production positive was detected, fumonisins in the extract of three individual transformants for a transformation plasmid were analyzed by LC-MS/MS according to [19]. The experimental culture was repeated in triplicate. FB1 (Enzo Life Sciences, Lausen, Switzerland), FB2 (Enzo Life Sciences), and FB3 (Iris Biotech, Marktredwitz, Germany) dissolved in acetonitrile/water (1:1, v/v) and were standard solutions. Working solutions containing FB1, FB2, and FB3 at concentrations between 0.05–5.0 mg/L (FB1/FB2: 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 mg/L, FB3: 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 1.0 mg/L, respectively, in six bottles) were used to create a calibration curve. The concentration (X) (FB1, FB2, and FB3) and corresponding peak area ratio were plotted for the 6 bottles of the working solution. The limits of qualification (LOQs) for the fumonisin analysis was the lowest concentration (FB1, FB2: 0.1 mg/L, FB3: 0.05 mg/L) on the calibration curves for FB1, FB2, and FB3. In cases where the concentration of the sample exceeded the range given by the calibration curve, the sample was diluted 10 times and reanalyzed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2072-6651/11/4/200/s1, Figure S1: PCR amplification for sequencing of FUM cluster, Figure S2: PCR detection of T21 in the transformant, Figure S3: Comparison of the amino acid sequences of FUM7 between fumonisin producing strain Gfc0825009 (upper) and fumonisin non-producing strain Gfc0801001 (lower), Figure S4: Comparison of nucleotide sequences of putative bidirectional promoter region of FUM6 and FUM7 between fumonisin producing strain Gfc0825009 (upper) and fumonisin non-producing strain Gfc0801001 (lower), Table S1: Result of SNP analyses and fumonisin production of the progenies between Gfc0825009 and Gfc0801001, Table S2: Primer used for RT-PCR, Table S3: Plasmid created in this study, Table S4: SNP at 2551st in FUM21,Table S5: Primer used for Luminex assay, Table S6: Primer used for sequencing of FUM cluster, Table S7: Transformants created in this study.

Author Contributions

S.S. contributed to conduct experiments, data analysis and manuscript writing; M.K. and H.K. also conducted some experiments. M.S., H.N. and K.K. always supervised this study. H.S. designed the experiment, contributed to manuscript writing and decided to publish the results.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP24580474.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tokiko Scott, Yasuko Takise, Tomomi Katsu and Ayako Usui (Gifu University) for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Fotso, J.; Leslie, J.F.; Smith, J.S. Production of beauvericin, moniliform, fusaproliferin and fumonisins B1, B2 and B3 by fifteen ex-type strains of Fusarium species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5195–5197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Desjardins, A.E.; Plattner, R.D.; Nelson, P.E. Production of fumonisin B1 and moniliformin by Gibberella fujikuroi rice from various geographic areas. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 1838–1842. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nelson, P.E.; Plattner, R.D.; Shackelford, D.D.; Desjardins, A.E. Fumonisin B1 production by Fusarium species other than F. moniliforme in section Liseola and by some related species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 984–989. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Rheeder, J.P.; Marasas, W.F.O.; Vismer, H.F. Production of fumonisin analogs by Fusarium species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2101–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, Y.; Zhu, T. Mycoflora analysis in staple corn from Linxian Jinggtoucun with high incidence of esophageal cancer. J. China Agric. Univ. 2002, 7, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Frisvad, J.C.; Smedsgaard, J.; Samson, R.A.; Larsen, T.O.; Thrane, U. Fumonisin B2 production by Aspergillus niger. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 9727–9732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Marasas, W.F.O. Fumonisins: History, worldwide occurrence and the impact. In Fumonisins in Food; Jackson, L.S., De Varies, J.W., Bullerman, L.B., Eds.; Plenum Publishing Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  8. Harrison, L.R.; Colvin, B.M.; Green, J.T.; Newman, L.E.; Cole, J.R. Pulmonary edema and hydrothorax in swine produced by fumonisin B1, a toxic metabolite of Fusarium moniliforme. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 1990, 2, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Marasas, W.F.O.; Miller, J.D.; Riley, R.T.; Visconti, A. Fumonisins occurrence, toxicology, metabolism and risk assessment. In Fusarium; Summerell, B.A., Lesilie, J.F., Backhouse, D., Bryden, W.L., Burgess, L., Eds.; The American Phytopathological Society Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2001; pp. 332–359. [Google Scholar]
  10. Marasas, W.F.O.; Riley, R.T.; Hendricks, K.A.; Stevens, V.L.; Sadler, T.W.; Gelineau-van Waes, J.; Missmer, S.A.; Cabrera, J.; Torres, O.; Gelderblom, W.C.A.; et al. Fumonisins disrupt sphingolipid metabolism, folate transport, and neural tube development in embryo culture and in vivo: A potential risk factor for human neural tube defects among populations consuming fumonisin-contaminated maize. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Abbas, H.K.; Tanaka, T.; Duke, S.O.; Porter, J.K.; Wray, E.M.; Hodges, L.; Sessions, A.E.; Wang, E.; Merril, A.H., Jr.; Riley, R.T. Fumonisin-and AAL-toxin-induced disruption of sphingolipid metabolism with accumulation of free sphingoid bases. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 106, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ross, P.F.; Rice, R.D.; Plattner, G.D.; Osweiler, T.M.; Wilson, D.L.; Owens, H.A.; Nelson; Richard, J.L. Concentrations of fumonisin B1 in feeds associated with animal health problems. Mycopathologia 1991, 114, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cruz, A.; Marín, P.; González-Jaén, M.T.; Aguilar, K.G.I.; Cumagun, C.J.R. Phylogenetic analysis, fumonisin production and pathogenicity of Fusarium fujikuroi strains isolated from rice in the Philippines. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 3032–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leslie, J.F.; Zeller, K.A.; Wohler, M.; Summerell, B.A. Interfertility of two mating populations in the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leslie, J.F.; Anderson, L.L.; Bowden, R.L.; Lee, Y.-W. Inter- and intra-specific genetic variation in Fusarium. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2007, 119, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, S.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Son, S.-W.; Lee, T.; Yun, S.-H. Fumonisin production by field isolates of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex from rice and corn in Korea. Res. Plant Dis. 2012, 18, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Suga, H.; Kitajima, M.; Nagumo, R.; Tsukiboshi, T.; Uegaki, R.; Nakajima, T.; Kushiro, M.; Nakagawa, H.; Shimizu, M.; Kageyama, K. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the translation elongation factor 1α gene correlates with the ability to produce fumonisin in Japanese Fusarium fujikuroi. Fungal Biol. 2014, 118, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rosler, S.M.; Sieber, M.K.C.; Humpf, H.-U.; Tudzynki, B. Interplay between pathway-specific and global regulation of the fumonisin gene cluster in the rice pathogen Fusarium fujikuroi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 5869–5882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Suga, H.; Arai, M.; Fukasawa, E.; Motohashi, K.; Nakagawa, H.; Tateishi, H.; Fuji, S.; Shimizu, M.; Kageyama, K.; Hyakumachi, M. Genetic differentiation associated with fumonisin and gibberellin production in Japanese Fusarium fujikuroi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Niehaus, E.-M.; Kim, H.-K.; Münsterkötter, M.; Janevska, S.; Arndt, B.; Kalinina, S.A.; Houterman, P.M.; Ahn, I.-P.; Alberti, I.; Tonti, S.; et al. Comparative genomics of geographically distant Fusarium fujikuroi isolates revealed two distinct pathotypes correlating with secondary metabolite profiles. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jeon, Y.-A.; Yu, S.-H.; Lee, Y.Y.; Park, H.-J.; Lee, S.; Sung, J.S.; Kim, Y.-G.; Lee, H.-S. Incidence molecular characteristics and pathogenicity of Gibberella fujikuroi species complex associated with rice seeds from Asian countries. Mycobiology 2013, 41, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sydenham, E.W.; Shepherd, G.S.; Thiel, P.G.; Marasas, W.F.O.; Stockenstrom, S. Fumonisin contamination of commercial corn-based human foodstuffs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 3, 2014–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Theil, P.G.; Marasas, W.F.O.; Sydenham, E.W.; Shephard, G.S.; Gelderblom, W.C.A. The implications of naturally occurring levels of fumonisins in corn for human and animal health. Mycopathologia 1992, 117, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Visconti, A.; Doko, M.B. Survey of fumonisin production by Fusarium isolated from cereals in Europe. J. AOAC Int. 1994, 77, 546–550. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shephard, G.S.; Theil, P.G.; Stokenstrom, S.; Sydenham, E.W. Worldwide survey of fumonisin contamination of corn and corn-based products. J. AOAC Int. 1996, 79, 671–687. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Bolton, S.L.; Brannen, P.M.; Glenn, A.E. A novel population of Fusarium fujikuroi isolated from southeastern U.S. winegrapes reveals the need to re-evaluate the species’ fumonisin production. Toxins 2016, 8, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Proctor, R.H.; Brown, D.W.; Plattner, R.D.; Desjardins, A.E. Co-expression of 15 contiguous genes delineates a fumonisin biosynthetic gene cluster in Gibberella moniliformis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2003, 38, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Butchko, R.A.E.; Plattner, R.D.; Proctor, R.H. Deletion analysis of FUM genes involved in tricarballylic ester formation during fumonisin during fumonisin biosynthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9398–9404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Desjardins, A.E. Fumonisins. In Fusarium Mycotoxins Chemistry, Genetics, and Biology; Desjardins, A.E., Ed.; The American Phytopathology Society Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2006; pp. 79–108. [Google Scholar]
  30. Brown, D.W.; Butchko, R.A.; Busman, M.; Proctor, R.H. The Fusarium verticillioides fum gene cluster encodes a Zn(II)2Cys6 protein that affects FUM gene expression and fumonisin production. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1210–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Glenn, A.E.; Zitomer, N.C.; Zimeri, A.M.; Williams, L.D.; Riley, R.T.; Proctor, R.H. Transformation-mediated complementation of a FUM gene cluster deletion in Fusarium verticillioides of restores both fumonisin and pathogenicity on maize seedlings. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 21, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chiara, M.; Fanelli, F.; Mulè, G.; Logrieco, A.F.; Pesole, G.; Leslie, J.F.; Horner, D.S.; Toomajian, C. Genome sequencing of multiple isolates highlights subtelomeric genomic diversity within Fusarium fujikuroi. Genome Biol. Evol. 2015, 7, 3062–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wiemann, P.; Sieber, C.M.K.; von Bargen, K.W.; Studt, L.; Niehaus, E.-M.; Espino, J.J.; Huß, K.; Michielse, C.B.; Albermann, S.; Wagner, D.; et al. Deciphering the cryptic genome: Genome-wide analyses of the rice pathogen Fusarium fujikuroi reveal complex regulation of secondary metabolism and novel metabolites. PLoS. Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tominaga, M.; Lee, Y.-H.; Hayashi, R.; Suzuki, Y.; Yamada, O.; Sakamoto, K.; Gotoh, K.; Akita, O. Molecular analysis of an inactive aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster in Aspergillus oryzae RIB strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chang, P.-K.; Matsushima, K.; Takahashi, T.; Yu, J.; Abe, D.B.; Yuan, G.-F.; Koyama, Y.; Cleveland, T.E. Understanding nonaflatoxigenicity of Aspergillus sojae: A windfall of aflatoxin biosynthesis research. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, J.; Ptashne, M. Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments. Cell 1987, 48, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Malonek, S.; Rojas, M.C.; Hedden, P.; Gaskin, P.; Hopkins, P.; Tudzynski, B. Functional characterization of two cytochrome P450 monooxygenase genes, P450-1 and P450-4, of the gibberellic acid gene cluster in Fusarium proliferatum (Gibberella fujikuroi MP-D). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 1462–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Malonek, S.; Rojas, M.C.; Hedden, P.; Hopkins, P.; Tudzynski, B. Restoration of gibberellin production in Fusarium proliferatum by functional complementation of enzymatic blocks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 6014–6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bowden, R.L.; Leslie, J.F. Sexual recombination in Gibberella zeae. Phytopathology 1999, 89, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Suga, H.; Karugia, G.W.; Ward, T.; Gale, L.R.; Tomimura, K.; Nakajima, T.; Miyasaka, A.; Koizumi, S.; Kageyama, K.; Hyakumachi, M. Molecular characterization of Fusarium graminearum species complex in Japan. Phytopathology 2008, 98, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Malonek, S.; Rojas, M.C.; Hedden, P.; Gaskin, P.; Hopkins, P. The NADPH-cytochrome p450 reductase gene from Gibberella fujikuroi is essential for gibberellin biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 25075–25084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kerenyi, Z.; Moretti, A.; Walwijk, C.; Olah, B.; Hornok, L. Mating type sequences in asexually reproducing Fusarium species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4419–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lian, C.; Hogetsu, T. A protocol for efficient development of microsatellite markers. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 2004, 86, 191–198. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  44. Carroll, A.M.; Sweigard, J.A.; Valent, B. Improved vectors for selecting resistance to hygromycin. Fungal Genet. Newsl. 1994, 41, 20–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kück, U.; Hoff, B. Application of the nourseothricin acetyltransferase gene (nat1) as dominant marker for the transformation of filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Rep. 2006, 53, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Namiki, F.; Matsunaga, M.; Okuda, M.; Inoue, I.; Nishi, K.; Fujita, Y.; Tsuge, T. Mutation of an arginine biosynthesis gene causes reduced pathogenicity in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2001, 14, 580–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Suga, H.; Kageyama, K.; Shimizu, M.; Hyakumachi, M. A natural mutation involving both pathogenicity and perithecium formation in the Fusarium graminearum species complex. G3 2016, 6, 3883–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Clouse, S.D.; Martensen, A.N.; Gilchrist, D.G. Rapid purification of host-specific pathotoxins from Alternaria alternata f. sp. lycopersici by solid-phase adsorption on octadecylsilane. J. Chromatogr. 1985, 350, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 11 00200 g001 550
Figure 1. RT-PCR result of (A) Gfc0825009, (B) Gfc0801001, and (C) FfT21FUMKOD (#2). RT-PCR product was subjected to 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. (+) means that the expected size of RT-PCR product was detected, (−) means not detected. HistoneH3 was used as a positive control.
Figure 1. RT-PCR result of (A) Gfc0825009, (B) Gfc0801001, and (C) FfT21FUMKOD (#2). RT-PCR product was subjected to 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. (+) means that the expected size of RT-PCR product was detected, (−) means not detected. HistoneH3 was used as a positive control.
Toxins 11 00200 g001
Toxins 11 00200 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of FUM21 of fumonisin producing strain Gfc0825009 (upper) and fumonisin nonproducing strain Gfc0801001 (lower).
Figure 2. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of FUM21 of fumonisin producing strain Gfc0825009 (upper) and fumonisin nonproducing strain Gfc0801001 (lower).
Toxins 11 00200 g002
Toxins 11 00200 g003 550
Figure 3. The results of FUM gene complementation in Gfc0801001 by transformation. The number of fumonisin producing transformants/the number of investigated transformants are indicated in parenthesis after the transformant names. Fumonisin production was determined by the detection of fumonisin by ELISA (detection limit is 0.22 ppm). “T” is the DNA fragment from fumonisin producing strain Gfc0825009. FUM17 in both Gfc0801001 and Gfc0825009 are pseudogene and, therefore, indicated in parenthesis. FUM16, FUM17, FUM18 and FUM19 are known to be not essential for fumonisin biosynthesis [28,29].
Figure 3. The results of FUM gene complementation in Gfc0801001 by transformation. The number of fumonisin producing transformants/the number of investigated transformants are indicated in parenthesis after the transformant names. Fumonisin production was determined by the detection of fumonisin by ELISA (detection limit is 0.22 ppm). “T” is the DNA fragment from fumonisin producing strain Gfc0825009. FUM17 in both Gfc0801001 and Gfc0825009 are pseudogene and, therefore, indicated in parenthesis. FUM16, FUM17, FUM18 and FUM19 are known to be not essential for fumonisin biosynthesis [28,29].
Toxins 11 00200 g003
Table
Table 1. Sequence homology of FUM gene between a fumonisin producing strain Gfc0825009 and a nonproducing strain Gfc0801001.
Table 1. Sequence homology of FUM gene between a fumonisin producing strain Gfc0825009 and a nonproducing strain Gfc0801001.
GeneGene ID aPredictive Function bHomology (%)Length of Amino Acid cThe Number of Different Amino Acid d
Nucleic AcidAmino Acid
FUM21FFUJ_09240 eZn(II)2Cys6 type-transcriptional regulator99.699.8688 e1 substitution, 11 deletion
FUM1FFUJ_09241Polyketide synthase99.699.625808 substitutions
FUM6FFUJ_09242Fumonisin oxygenase99.399.211158 substitutions
FUM7FFUJ_09243Alcohol dehydrogenase98.899.24203 substitutions
FUM8FFUJ_09244Aminotransferase98.298.383014 substitutions, 2 insertion
FUM3FFUJ_09245Fumonisin 5-oxygenase99.399.63001 substitution
FUM10FFUJ_09246Tricarballylic esterification99.599.45613 substitutions
FUM11FFUJ_09247Tricarballylic esterification98.798.33005 substitutions
FUM2FFUJ_09248Fumonisin 10-oxygenase98.899.05025 substitutions
FUM13FFUJ_09249C3 carbonyl reductase99.599.53672 substitutions
FUM14FFUJ_09250Tricarballylic esterification99.199.15565 substitutions, 5 insertion
FUM15FFUJ_09251Cytochromosome P450 monooxygenase98.798.65998 substitutions
FUM16FFUJ_09252Fatty acyl-coenzyme A synthetase98.498.76829 substitutions, 10 deletion
FUM17- fSimilarity to tomato longevity assurance factor (ASC-1) of Alternaria alternata f. sp. lycopersici- f- f- f- f
FUM18FFUJ_09253Similarity to tomato longevity assurance factor (ASC-1) of Alternaria alternata f. sp. lycopersici99.197.541310 substitutions
FUM19FFUJ_09254Similarity to ATP-binding cassette (ABC) multidrug resistant transporter99.199.0150515 substitutions
a: Gene ID of whole genome sequence of the strain IMI58289 [33]. b: Predictive function of FUM genes, except for FUM21 [30], was referred to [29]. c: Value of Gfc0825009. d: Sequence of Gfc0801001 compared to that of Gfc0825009. e: Intron region was modified from that of IMI58289 [33] in the database according to FUM21 (FVEG_14633, protein ID: XP_018742371.1) of Fusarium verticillioides. f: FUM17 of both Gfc0825009 and Gfc0801001 are pseudogene.
Table
Table 2. Fumonisin production of transformants a.
Table 2. Fumonisin production of transformants a.
Transformant bFirst Time CultureSecond Time CultureThird Time Culture
FB1FB2FB3FB1FB2FB3FB1FB2FB3
FfDTFUM21_6_13(#1)43.631.12>10.00>50.007.577.964.620.851.29
FfDTFUM21_6_13(#2)46.561.86>10.00>50.005.76>10.00>50.003.737.78
FfDTFUM21_6_13(#3)24.801.018.350.41ND0.120.20ND0.12
FfDTFUM21G888C_6_13(#5)3.700.20>1.0047.034.09>10.0027.152.455.22
FfDTFUM21G888C_6_13(#6)37.231.28>10.00NDNDNDNDNDND
FfDTFUM21G888C_6_13(#7)>50.002.39>10.000.19ND0.08NDNDND
FfDT21T67FUMKOD(#11)1.570.260.980.950.190.301.330.240.36
FfDT21T67FUMKOD(#16)3.620.380.712.880.930.941.720.670.79
FfDT21T67FUMKOD(#17)0.570.170.092.591.420.360.14NDND
FfT67T21FUMKOD2(#7)0.20ND0.06NDNDNDNDNDND
FfT67T21FUMKOD2(#11)NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
FfT67T21FUMKOD2(#16)NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
FfT7AT21FUMKOD2(#23)0.19ND0.15NDNDNDNDNDND
FfT7AT21FUMKOD2(#34)0.11ND0.10NDNDNDNDNDND
FfT7AT21FUMKOD2(#18)0.13ND0.081.06ND0.250.48ND0.21
Gfc0825009(Donor strain)>50.00>50.003.7044.4035.702.1342.6036.662.59
Gfc0801001(Original strain)NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
a: Fumonisins from a part of the transformants with ELISA positive in three-time culture were quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC- MS/MS). The limit of quantification (LOQ) is 0.1 ppm for FB1, FB2, and 0.05 ppm for FB3. ND means less than LOQ. b: (#) indicates individual transformant number.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sultana, S.; Kitajima, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Nakagawa, H.; Shimizu, M.; Kageyama, K.; Suga, H. A Natural Variation of Fumonisin Gene Cluster Associated with Fumonisin Production Difference in Fusarium fujikuroi. Toxins 2019, 11, 200. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins11040200

AMA Style

Sultana S, Kitajima M, Kobayashi H, Nakagawa H, Shimizu M, Kageyama K, Suga H. A Natural Variation of Fumonisin Gene Cluster Associated with Fumonisin Production Difference in Fusarium fujikuroi. Toxins. 2019; 11(4):200. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins11040200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sultana, Sharmin, Miha Kitajima, Hironori Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Nakagawa, Masafumi Shimizu, Koji Kageyama, and Haruhisa Suga. 2019. "A Natural Variation of Fumonisin Gene Cluster Associated with Fumonisin Production Difference in Fusarium fujikuroi" Toxins 11, no. 4: 200. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins11040200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop