Next Article in Journal
In Silico Conformational Features of Botulinum Toxins A1 and E1 According to Intraluminal Acidification
Next Article in Special Issue
Aflatoxins in Cereals and Cereal-Based Products: Occurrence, Toxicity, Impact on Human Health, and Their Detoxification and Management Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Resveratrol Protects against Zearalenone-Induced Mitochondrial Defects during Porcine Oocyte Maturation via PINK1/Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seasonal Variation of Aflatoxin Levels in Selected Spices Available in Retail Markets: Estimation of Exposure and Risk Assessment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/toxins14090642
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variation of Aflatoxin Levels in Stored Edible Seed and Oil Samples and Risk Assessment in the Local Population

by
Shahzad Zafar Iqbal
1,
Muhammad Waqas
1,
Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis
2,3,4,*,
Sunusi Usman
3,
Nada Basheir Ali
2 and
Muhammad Rafique Asi
5
1
Department of Applied Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
2
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
3
Natural Medicines and Products Research Laboratory, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
4
Laboratory of Food Security and Food Integrity (FOSFI), Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
5
Food Toxicology Lab, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology, Faisalabad 38950, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2022, 14(9), 642; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins14090642
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 9 September 2022 / Published: 17 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycotoxins in Food and Feed: Detection and Identification)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Five hundred and twenty samples of edible seeds and oilseeds (sunflower, palm, peanut, sesame, cotton, and grapeseed) were purchased from markets, farmers, and superstores in the central cities of Punjab, Pakistan. A total of 125 (48.1%) edible seed samples from a 6 ≤ months storage period, and 127 (48.8%) from a 2 ≥ years storage period were found to be infested with AFs. The average elevated amount of AFB1 and total AFs was observed in a 2 ≥ years storage period, i.e., 28.6 ± 4.5 and 51.3 ± 10.4 µg/kg, respectively, in sesame seeds. The minimum amount of AFB1 and total AFs was observed in palm seed samples with a storage period of 6 ≤ months, i.e., 9.96 ± 2.4, and 11.7 ± 1.90 µg/kg, respectively. The maximum amount of AFB1 and total AFs were observed in peanut oil samples, i.e., 21.43 ± 2.60 and 25.96 ± 4.30 µg/kg, respectively, with a storage period of 2 ≥ years. Therefore, the maximum dietary intake of 59.60 ng/kg/day was observed in oil samples stored at a ≥ 2 years storage period. The results of the present study concluded that a significant difference was found in the amounts of total AFs in edible seed samples stored at 6 ≤ months and 2 ≥ years storage periods (p < 0.05).
Keywords:
selected seeds and oils; aflatoxins; storage effect; dietary assessment
Key Contribution: A total of 125 (48.1%) samples of edible seeds from a 6 ≤ months storage period and 127 (48.8%) from a 2 ≥ years storage period were found to be contaminated with AFs. The highest amount of AFB1 and total AFs was observed in peanut oil samples, i.e., 21.43 ± 2.60 and 25.96 ± 4.30 µg/kg, respectively, at a storage period of 2 ≥ years. Therefore, the maximum dietary intake of 59.60 ng/kg/day was observed by individuals having consumed oil of a ≥ 2 years storage period.

1. Introduction

In a recent survey, it was determined that 690 million people (8.9% of the global population) are facing hunger and lack of food, and this number increases by 10 million people/year [1]. Food insecurity affects 1.3 billion people, with 21.3% of children younger than five years being termed as underdeveloped. The situation has become more serious with the current COVID-19 pandemic, leaving an estimated 83 to 321 million people undernourished. In another estimation, the world will need to produce 60% more food to feed the population of around 9.3 billion in 2050 [1]. Pakistan is an agricultural country; however, it still cannot produce sufficient edible oils for domestic requirements. The consumption of 27.73 million metric tons of vegetable oils per capita, with a total of 19.5 kg for edible and inedible purposes, has been recorded. It has been estimated that 18 to 20% of calories are achieved from edible oils, with a total average intake of 2400 calories per day. Over the last decade, the consumption of liquid cooking oil increased over the consumption of solid fats [2]. By importing palm oil from Indonesia and Malaysia, Pakistan meets 80–90% of its total edible oil demand. The imported palm oil is used in various goods, such as chocolates, vanaspati ghee, soap, and bakery goods [3]. However, the seeds used to produce other oils may be affected by environmental conditions developed during the pre-harvest or post-harvest cultivation of crops. Furthermore, drying, transportation, and storage conditions also play a vital role in fungal attacks [4,5].
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites which produce a wide range of toxins from fungi under specific climatic and storage conditions [6,7,8]. The most toxic type of mycotoxins are aflatoxins (AFs) [9]. These are produced by filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus, and Aspergillus nomious [10]. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) has been classified as group 1 (carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [11]. It has shown carcinogenic and cytotoxic effects [12]. The impact of AFs toxicity in animals and humans has been observed in previous studies. The exposure of AFs in animals or humans could come from direct inhalation or contact, or by consuming contaminated food from plants or animals [13]. The toxic effects of AFB1 are digestive tract disorders, growth retardation, liver toxicity, or even cancer [14,15]. Besides these carcinogenic effects, other reports have shown its mutagenic and immunosuppressive effects in animals [6]. In animals, pulmonary toxicity has been observed in vivo in male albino rats [16], genotoxicity has been observed in vivo in mice [17], and gastrointestinal toxicity has been observed in vivo in rats [18], pigs [19], and chickens [20,21]. In addition, several studies from around the world [22,23,24,25,26] and from Pakistan [5,27] have documented the presence of AFs in edible seeds and oil samples.
Considering the above circumstances, our study is focused on investigating the presence of AFs in selected edible seed and oil samples stored for various storage periods. Furthermore, the dietary intake of AFs in individuals from different age groups consuming edible oil has also been evaluated. Therefore, this study will help food agencies to implement strict regulations for AFs in edible seed and oil samples.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. HPLC Method Validation

Linearity, repeatability, reproducibility, recovery analysis, detection limits (LOD), and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were important parameters of the analytical method. The precision of the method was analyzed by adding 3 fortified amounts of AFB1, AFG1, AFB2, and AFG2 (1, 4, and 8 µg/L), in a mixed sample of edible oils. The average recovery values varied from 74.5 to 96.5%, with the relative standard deviation (RSD) from 9 to 21.5%. For linearity, seven-point standard curves were constructed for each Afs, i.e., for AFB1 and AFG1 (0.50, 6, 14, 50, 140, 250 µg/kg) and AFB2 and AFG2 (1, 5, 20, 40, 60, and 80 µg/kg). The linearity of the curves could be assessed with the value of the coefficient of determination (R2) ≥ 0.99. The detection limits (LOD) of AFB1 and AFG1 were 0.08 µg/kg, and LOQ was 0.24 µg/kg. However, the LOD and LOQ for AFG2 and AFB2 were 0.09 and 0.27 µg/kg, respectively. In the previous study, the linearity range for AFB1 and AFG1 was 1 to 80 µg/kg and 0.5 to 12 µg/L for AFB2 and AFG2. The LOD and LOQ were 0.04 and 0.12 µg/kg for AFB1 and AFG1 and 0.6 and 0.18 µg/kg for AFG2 and AFB2, respectively [5]. The results agreed with those in the study by Waqas et al. [27].

2.2. Occurrence of Afs in Inedible Seeds and Oil Samples

The study focused on examining the amount of AFB1 and total AFs in stored edible seeds (6 ≤ months and 2 ≥ years) in 520 samples from the central and southern cities of Punjab, Pakistan. The findings indicated that 125 (48.1%) samples of selected edible seeds from a 6 ≤ months storage period, and 127 (48.8%) samples from a 2 ≥ years of storage period were detected to be contaminated with AFs (levels ≥ LOD). The extreme mean value of AFB1 and total AFs were 28.6 ± 4.5 and 51.3 ± 10.4 µg/kg in the sesame samples (2 ≥ years storage period), respectively, as presented in Table 1.
However, the minimum amount of 9.96 ± 2.4 and 11.7 ± 1.90 µg/kg was documented for AFB1 and total AFs in palm seeds samples (2 ≥ years storage period), respectively, as shown in Table 2. Furthermore, the amounts of total AFs (<20 µg/kg, 21–50 µg/kg, and ≥51 µg/kg) in selected edible seed samples from different storage periods are represented in Figure 1. The results show that a higher percentage of total AFs levels was observed in edible seed samples stored for a 2 ≥ year storage period.
Samples of 520 edible oils, 260 samples each from a 6 ≤ months storage period and a 2 ≥ years storage period, were examined for the prevalence of AFB1 and total AFs, as indicated in Table 2. Similarly, the levels of total AFs in different ranges from both storage periods are represented in Figure 2. Samples of 125 (48.1%) from a 6 ≤ months storage period and 132 (50.1%) samples originating from a 2 ≥ years storage period were found to be confirmed with AFs. The highest means of AFB1 (21.43 ± 2.60 µg/kg) and total AFs (25.96 ± 4.30 µg/kg were demonstrated for the 2 ≥ years storage period for palm samples, and the minimum amount of 6.25 ± 3.20, and 6.48 ± 4.30 µg/kg were recorded for grapeseed samples from a 6 ≤ months storage period, respectively. There existed a significant difference in the amounts of AFs between the 6 ≤ months and 2 ≥ years storage periods (p < 0.005).
In a previous study, Yeboah et al. [28] documented aflatoxin levels in groundnut seeds during storage in Ghana. Aflatoxins were detected after four months of storage only in Nkosour (148.21 µg/kg), while Adepa and Kwame Danso verified higher amounts of AFB1 (45.918 µg/kg), and B2 (410.974 µg/kg), respectively. Razis et al. [5] studied 779 samples of edible nuts from southern Punjab (Pakistan) and recorded 20.9 ± 3.10 µg/kg total AFs in seedless watermelon seed samples. However, 15.9 ± 3.60 µg/kg of total AFs was recorded in seedless melon seed samples. Wenndt et al. [7] documented 595 samples of cereals, pulses, and oilseeds, analyzing AFB1 contaminations and their health risks. Ogungbemile et al. [8] studied aflatoxins in cowpea seeds in Nigeria. They recorded elevated amounts of aflatoxins B1 (1.5 × 10−2 μg/g), G1 (0.60 × 10−2 μg/g), G2 (1.0 × 10−2 μg/g), and B2 (0.80 × 10−2 μg/g), respectively.
However, in previous studies, Mohammed et al. [29] analyzed unrefined (n = 21) and refined (n = 40) samples of sunflowers seeds. They observed that 6 (15%) out of 40 samples were contaminated with AFB1, ranging from LOD to 218 ng/g. Furthermore, 3 samples contained amounts higher than the limit according to the Tanzanian Bureau of Standards (TBS) and the European Commission/European Union (EC/EU) permissible limit (2 ng/g). In another study, Banu and Muthumary [24], from Karnataka, India, studied sunflower oil samples and observed that 10 (43.4%) samples out of 23 were infested with AFB1, while all refined oil samples had levels ˂ LOD. Beheshti and Asadi [30], from Iran, investigated the incidence of AFs in sunflower and safflower seeds and revealed that 64% of the sunflower seed samples were infected with AFs. The findings revealed that 103 (83.7%) samples of safflower seeds (mean amounts 2.81 to 0.44 ng/g), and 8 (16%) samples of sunflower seeds (mean level 40.68 ng/g) were found to be contaminated. The levels of AFB1 in 5 sunflower and 2 and safflower seed samples were elevated above the recommended regulations of the European Union (2 ng/g). Ferrracane et al. [25], from Italy and Morocco, documented that 3 (10%) of 30 olive oil samples were polluted with AFB1 and OTA, varying between 0.54 to 2.50 ng/g. In another study, Karunarathna et al. [22] analyzed 59 vegetable oil samples (43 branded and 16 unbranded) and concluded that a considerable amount (37.5%) of samples were positive for AFs and AFB1 within the range of 2.25 to 72.70 μg/kg, and 1.76 to 60.92 μg/kg, respectively. AFB1 levels in 2 oil samples were observed in amounts higher than those recommended by the EU (2 μg/kg). Mariod and Idris [26], from Sudan, studied 241 groundnut samples (186) and sunflower (55) oils, and the results showed that the growing, harvesting, and storage of crops were the main reasons for the high contamination of AFs.
The findings revealed that 14.5% of sunflower oil and 54.8% of groundnuts samples had levels of AFs ≥ LOD. Nabizadeh et al. [31] examined the AFs (AFB1, B2, G1, G2) in six categories (canola, blend, frying, olive, sunflower, unrefined olive oil) of 97 edible oils, and results revealed that 98% of the samples had an AFB1 level ˂ LOD. Some contaminated samples had AFs levels that were within the standard established by EU regulation (2 μg/kg for AFB1 and 4 µg/kg for total AFs). Shar et al. [32], from Pakistan, investigated cotton seeds and cottonseed cakes for the incidence of AFB1 in 110 samples and observed that the extreme mean amount of AFs in cottonseed cakes was 89 μg/kg.
Earlier studies have shown that mycelia and aflatoxigenic fungi could already be present in harvested grains. The primary carrier for the fungal attack might be insects [33,34]. During postharvest, the dominant effects are the length and method of storage [35,36]. Therefore, the quality of stored food depends on the storage conditions and methods [37]. Furthermore, the methods and storage times might differ depending on the geographical region [38]. The dominant factors regarding geographical impact in Pakistan are illiteracy and using old traditional methods of cultivation, harvesting, and storage [39]. The cost and availability of storage units are also vital in maintaining the quality and safety of food products [36]. Therefore, continued monitoring of mycotoxins in foodstuffs helps to establish models that predict the seasonal variation of AFs in different food products [40].
Furthermore, drought during preharvest or postharvest might affect the crops and provide favorable conditions for the growth of fungi such as Aspergillus [41,42,43]. The difference in the levels of AFs in seeds might be influenced by factors such as harvesting practices, storage conditions, transportation, the use of analysis techniques, etc. [44].

3. Dietary Assessment of Aflatoxins in Edible Oil Samples

The dietary intake of total AFs in edible oil (sunflower oil) was analyzed in male individuals from central and southern Punjab, as described in Table 3. Sunflower oil is utilized during cooking in Pakistan; therefore, we have estimated dietary intake using sunflower oil samples. The highest mean dietary intake of 59.60 ng/kg/day was estimated in oil samples stored for a 2 ≥ years storage period in individuals ≥33 years old.
In previous studies, a dietary intake of 0.90 µg/kg/day was detected for a sunflower oil sample in female individuals aged between 16–22 years old [42]. A dietary intake of 6.30 µg/kg/day was estimated for pumpkin seed samples in female individuals from Pakistan [5]. Assessing dietary intake levels depends on many factors, such as eating habits, traditions, genetic variations in the human body, seasonal variations, regional differences, and ethical beliefs [27].

4. Conclusions

The study examined the variation in the levels of AFs in edible seeds and oil samples stored for different storage periods (i.e., 6 ≤ months and 2 ≥ years storage periods). The research has shown that significant differences were detected in the levels of AFs in edible seeds from different storage periods (p < 0.05). However, a non-significant difference was observed in the amounts of AFs in edible oil samples from different storage periods (p ≥ 0.05). A considerably high level of dietary intake was observed in sunflower oil. The results confirm the continuing importance of monitoring AFs in edible seeds, and strict regulations should be imposed to avoid/minimize their presence in edible seeds.

5. Methodology

5.1. Sampling

The samples (n = 520) of edible seeds (sunflower, palm, peanut, sesame, cotton, and grapeseed) were purchased from markets and superstores (at different storage conditions, i.e., 6 ≤ months and 2 ≥ years) from the central cities of Punjab, Pakistan. Next, the oil was obtained from each sample, and their I.D.s were marked accordingly. A total of 260 samples of each edible seeds were collected from 6 ≤ months and 2 ≥ years of storage. In Pakistan, the cultivation season of edible seeds is January–February, and the harvesting season is May–June. Therefore, a 6-month storage period means that the crop was harvested in June 2021. However, for a 2-year storage period, the cultivation period of the crop was the June 2019 season. The edible seeds were mostly stored in jute bags, and the storage temperature was room temperature. The sample size of each seed was not less than 5 kg each. The methodology for collecting seed samples was random, and the gross sampling technique was used for lab samples.

5.2. Chemicals and Reagents

The chemicals, including AFs standards, HPLC grade methanol, acetonitrile, n-hexane, chloroform, sodium chloride, and anhydrous sodium sulfate, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, (Steinheim, Germany). Dichloromethane, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Karachi, Pakistan). Furthermore, of Milli-Q® EQ 7000 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) distilled water (double distilled) was used during the research.

5.3. Edible Seed Samples and Aflatoxins Extraction

The extraction process for AFs in edible seed samples was achieved, as discussed in the methods of [45]. Briefly, the sample (25 g) was mixed in 125 mL of 55% methanol solution. Then 100 mL hexane, with the addition of 2 g of NaCl, was added and homogenized for 15 min with an orbital shaker. Next, the solution was filtered (Whatman No.1, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and the solution was placed in a dark place for 30 min to develop polar and non-polar phases. From the polar phase, a portion of 25 mL solution was moved into the separating funnel, and 10 mL of chloroform was added. The process was repeated 3 times to completely extract the AFs from the mixture. Finally, the chloroform layer was drained out from the two layers in a 250 mL beaker using anhydrous sodium sulfate. A water bath evaporated the solution at 60 °C until dry.

5.4. Oil Samples and Extraction of Aflatoxins

The process for extracting the AFs from the edible oil samples was conducted as described by AOAC [45], with some modifications. First, a sample (50 mL) of oil was mixed in a solution of 250 mL of 55% methanol. Next, the solution was centrifuged (4500 rpm) for 5 min after adding 50 mL of 0.1N HCL solution. The solution was filtered (Whatman no 1), and 50 mL of the solution, along with 50 mL each of hexane and 10% solution of NaCl were moved in a separating funnel. The mixture was mixed vigorously for 60 s and allowed to develop polar and non-polar phases. Then, the polar layer was drained out in a separator, and 20 mL of dichloromethane was added, and the mixture was shaken vigorously. After 5 min, the dichloromethane layer was moved into a vial and evaporated to dryness. Next, the derivatization of AFB1 and AFG1 was carried out by adding 100 µL of TFA to the dried oil or seed samples and vortexed (30 s). The residues were left in a dark place for 5 min. Finally, 400 µL of acetonitrile–water (1:9 v/v) solution was added, and a 20 µL sample was subjected to HPLC study.

5.5. HPLC Conditions

The Shimadzu (Model-LC-10A, Kyoto, Japan) HPLC instrument with a stationary phase (C18 column; 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm of Discovery, HS, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and a detector (fluorescence; RF-530, Kyoto, Japan) were used in a reverse phase mode. The HPLC mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile, water, and acetic acid (10; 50; 40 v/v/v) with a 1 mL/min flow rate during analysis. The emission and excitation wavelengths were set at 325 and 295 nm, respectively.

5.6. Dietary Intake Assessment

The assessment of daily intake was done using the method described in [46,47], where daily intake (EDI) is calculated as:
Dietary   intake   ( µ g / kg / day ) = D a i l y   C o n s u m p t i o n   o f   o i l   ( k g / d a y ) × M e a n   t o t a l   A F s   ( µ g / k g ) I n d i v i d u a l   m e a n   w e i g h t   ( k g )
The daily intake data was attained by designing a food frequency questionnaire for 600 participants, of which 405 replied. The different age groups of individuals from central Punjab and Southern Punjab, along with their average weight, are shown in Figure 3a,b, respectively. Prior written consent was obtained, with the condition that their information would not be disclosed. All ethical and confidential guidelines have been implemented during the evaluation of the food frequency questionnaire.

5.7. Statistical Analysis

The experimental observations and results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The seven-point calibration curve was constructed for each AFs, and the value of R2 was evaluating correlation/regression analysis. Linearity was determined with a coefficient of determination and straight-line equations. The significant difference in the amounts of AFs in stored seeds and oil samples was evaluated using a one-way Analysis of Variance (α = 0.05) SPSS (IBM 26, Chicago, IL, USA). The significant differences among treatments were calculated using LSD analysis.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, M.W.; software, S.U. and N.B.A.; data collection, M.R.A.; writing—review and editing, S.Z.I. and A.F.A.R.; conceptualization, S.Z.I.; supervision, S.Z.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.F.A.R appreciate the funding of Universiti Putra Malaysia. S.Z.I appreciate the funding of Higher Education Commission, Islamabad (NRPU-5574). The APC was provided by Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The data did not require an institutional review board statement; however, written informed consent was obtained from the participants in the study.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data is available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly obliged to the NIAB, Faisalabad, for the use of their analytical facilities, and express gratitude for the financial support provided by HEC, NRPU-5574, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. In Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets FAO; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020; 320p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Iqbal, S.; Sherazi, S.T.H.; Bhanger, M.I. The vegetable oil industry in Pakistan. Econ. World Trade 2005, 18. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferozi, M. Edible Oil and Pakistan. Available online: https://dailytimes.com.pk/860903/edible-oils-and-pakistan/ (accessed on 26 July 2022).
  4. Set, E.; Erkmen, O. The aflatoxin contamination of ground red pepper and pistachio nuts sold in Turkey. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 2532–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Razis, A.F.A.; Shehzad, M.M.; Usman, S.; Ali, N.B.; Iqbal, S.Z.; Naheed, N.; Asi, M.R. Seasonal Variation in Aflatoxin Levels in Edible Seeds, Estimation of Its Dietary Intake and Vitamin E Levels in Southern Areas of Punjab, Pakistan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Iqbal, S.Z.; Malik, S.; Asi, M.R.; Jinap, S.; Malik, N. Natural occurrence of patulin in different fruits, juices and smoothies and evaluation of dietary intake in Punjab, Pakistan. Food Contr. 2018, 84, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wenndt, A.; Sudini, H.K.; Pingali, P.; Nelson, R. Exploring aflatoxin contamination and household-level exposure risk in diverse Indian food systems. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ogungbemile, O.A.; Etaware, P.M.; Odebode, A.C. Aflatoxin Detection and Quantification in Stored Cowpea Seeds in Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2020, 3, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Iqbal, S.Z.; Mehmood, Z.; Asi, M.R.; Shahid, M.; Sehar, M.; Malik, N. Co-occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in nuts, dry fruits, and nuty products. J. Food Saf. 2018, 38, e12462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iqbal, S.Z.; Asi, M.R.; Nisar, S.; Zia, K.M.; Jinap, S.; Malik, N. A Limited Survey of Aflatoxins and Zearalenone in Feed and Feed Ingredients from Pakistan. J. Food Prot. 2016, 79, 1798–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. IARC. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity. Some naturally occurring substances: Food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. In IARC Monographs on Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans. 1993, No. 56. Lyons, France; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  12. Iqbal, S.Z.; Asi, M.R.; Malik, N. The seasonal variation of aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products and assessment of dietary intake in Punjab, Pakistan. Food Contr. 2017, 79, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wangia, R.N.; Tang, L.; Wang, J.S. Occupational exposure to aflatoxins and health outcomes: A review. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C Environ. Carcinog. Rev. 2019, 37, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Robert, H.; Payros, D.; Pinton, P.; Théodorou, V.; Mercier-Bonin, M.; Oswald, I.P. Impact of mycotoxins on the intestine: Are mucus and microbiota new targets? J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B Crit. Rev. 2017, 20, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jin, S.; Yang, H.; Jiao, Y.; Pang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, M.; Shan, A.; Feng, X. Dietary Curcumin Alleviated Acute Ileum Damage of Ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) Induced by AFB1 through Regulating Nrf2-ARE and NF-κB Signaling Pathways. Foods 2021, 10, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. El-Sayed Mostafa, H.; Ahmed Allithy, A.N.; Abdellatif, N.A.; Anani, M.; Fareed, S.A.; El-Shafei, D.A.; Alaa El-Din, E.A. Amelioration of Pulmonary Aflatoxicosis by Green Tea Extract: An in Vivo Study. Toxicon 2021, 189, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhou, H.; Wang, J.; Ma, L.; Chen, L.; Guo, T.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, H.; Yu, Y. Oxidative DNA Damage and Multi-Organ Pathologies in Male Mice Subchronically Treated with Aflatoxin B1. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 186, 109697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Akinrinde, A.S.; Adebiyi, O.E.; Asekun, A. Amelioration of Aflatoxin B1-Induced Gastrointestinal Injuries by Eucalyptus Oil in Rats. J. Complement. Integr. Med. 2019, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pu, J.; Yuan, Q.; Yan, H.; Tian, G.; Chen, D.; He, J.; Zheng, P.; Yu, J.; Mao, X.; Huang, Z.; et al. Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low Levels of Dietary Aflatoxin B1 on Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility and Intestinal Health in Pigs. Animals 2021, 11, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hernández-Ramírez, J.O.; Nava-Ramírez, M.J.; Merino-Guzmán, R.; Téllez-Isaías, G.; Vázquez-Durán, A.; Méndez-Albores, A. The Effect of Moderate-Dose Aflatoxin B1 and Salmonella Enteritidis Infection on Intestinal Permeability in Broiler Chickens. Mycotoxin Res. 2020, 36, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pickova, D.; Ostry, V.; Toman, J.; Malir, F. Aflatoxins: History, Significant Milestones, Recent Data on Their Toxicity and Ways to Mitigation. Toxins 2021, 13, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Karunarathna, N.B.; Fernando, C.J.; Munasinghe, D.M.S.; Fernando, R. Occurrence of aflatoxins in edible vegetable oils in Sri Lanka. Food Contr. 2019, 101, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bordin, K.; Sawada, M.M.; da Costa Rodrigues, C.E.; da Fonseca, C.R.; Oliveira, C.A.F. Incidence of aflatoxins in oil seeds and possible transfer to oil: A review. Food Eng. Rev. 2014, 6, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Banu, N.; Muthumary, J. Aflatoxin B1 contamination in sunflower oil collected from sunflower oil refinery situated in Karnataka. Health 2010, 2, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ferracane, R.; Tafuri, A.; Logieco, A.; Galvano, F.; Balzano, D.; Ritieni, A. Simultaneous determination of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A and their natural occurrence in Mediterranean virgin olive oil. Food Addit. Contam. 2007, 24, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mariod, A.A.; Idris, Y.M.A. Aflatoxin B1 levels in groundnut and sunflower oils in different Sudanese states. Food Addit Contam Part B. 2015, 8, 266–270. [Google Scholar]
  27. Waqas, M.; Iqbal, S.Z.; Razis, A.F.A.; Pervaiz, W.; Ahmad, T.; Usman, S.; Ali, N.B.; Asi, M.R. Occurrence of Aflatoxins in Edible Vegetable Seeds and Oil Samples Available in Pakistani Retail Markets and Estimation of Dietary Intake in Consumers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021, 18, 8015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yeboah, A.; Ahiakpa, J.K.; Adjei-Nsiah, S. Aflatoxin levels in seeds of commonly grown groundnut varieties (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Ghana as influenced by storage method. African J. Food, Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2020, 20, 15402–15414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohammed, S.; Munissi, J.J.E.; Nyandoro, S.S. Aflatoxins in sunflower seeds and unrefined sunflower oils from Singida, Tanzania. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2018, 11, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beheshti, H.R.; Asadi, M. Aflatoxins in sunflower and safflower seeds from Iran. Food Addit. Contam. Part B 2013, 6, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Nabizadeh, S.; Shariatifar, N.; Shokoohi, E.; Shoeibi, S.; Gavahian, M.; Fakhri, Y.; Khaneghah, A.M. Prevalence and probabilistic health risk assessment of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in Iranian edible oils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 35562–35570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shar, Z.H.; Pirkash, O.; Shar, H.H.; Sherazi, S.T.H.; Mahesar, S.A. Aflatoxins in cotton seeds and cotton seed cake from Pakistan. Food Addit Contam: Part B 2020, 13, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nesci, A.; Barra, P.; Etcheverry, M. Integrated management of insect vectors of Aspergillus flavus in stored maize using synthetic antioxidants and natural phytochemicals. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2011, 47, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. 34 Nesci, A.; Montemarani, A.; Passone, M.A.; Etcheverry, M. Insecticidal activity of synthetic antioxidants, natural phytochemicals, and essential oils against an Aspergillus section Flavi vector (Oryzaephilus surinamensis L.) in microcosm. J. Pest. Sci. 2011, 84, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Okello, D.K.; Kaaya, A.N.; Bisikwa, J.; Were, M.; Olota, H.K. Management of Aflatoxins in groundnut: Manual for farmers, processors, traders and consumers in Uganda; Makerere University, National Agricultural Research Organisation: Kampala, Uganda, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sugri, I.; Osiru, M.; Larbi, A.; Buah, S.S.; Nutsugah, S.K.; Asieku, Y.; Lamini, S. Aflatoxin manage ment in Northern Ghana: Current prevalence and priority strategies in maize (Zea mays L). J. Stored Prod. Postharvest. Res. 2015, 6, 48e55. [Google Scholar]
  37. Temba, M.C.; Njobeh, P.B.; Kayitesi, E. Storage stability of maize-groundnut composite flours and an assessment of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A contamination in flours and porridges. Food Control. 2017, 71, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hell, K.; Cardwell, K.F.; Setamou, M.; Poehling, H.M. The influence of storage practices on aflatoxin contamination in maize in four agroecological zones of Benin, West Africa. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2000, 36, 365–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iqbal, S.Z.; Razis, A.F.A.; Usman, S.; Ali, N.B.; Asi, M.R. Variation of Deoxynivalenol Levels in Corn and Its Products Available in Retail Markets of Punjab, Pakistan, and Estimation of Risk Assessment. Toxins 2021, 13, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Fels-Klerx, H.J.V.D.; Klemsdal, S.; Hietaniemi, V.; Lindblad, M.; Ioannou-Kakouri, E.; Van Asselt, E.D. Mycotoxin contamination of cereal grain commodities in relation to climate in North West Europe. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2012, 29, 1581–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Shapira, R.; Paster, N. Control of mycotoxins in storage and techniques for their decontamination. In Mycotoxins in Food: Detection and Control; Olsen, M.N., Ed.; Elsevier Science: Cambridge, UK, 2004; pp. 190–223. [Google Scholar]
  42. Okello, D.K.; Biruma, M.; Deom, C.M. Overview of groundnuts research in Uganda: Past, present and future. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 6448–6459. [Google Scholar]
  43. Waqas, M.; Pervaiz, W.; Zia, K.M.; Iqbal, S.Z. Assessment of aflatoxin B1 in animal feed and aflatoxin M1 in raw milk samples of different species of milking animals from Punjab, Pakistan. J. Food Safe. 2021, 41, e12893. [Google Scholar]
  44. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. In Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 16th ed.; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  45. AOAC. International Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed.; Association of Analytical Communities: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  46. Iqbal, S.Z.; Asi, M.R.; Hanif, U.; Zuber, M.; Jinap, S. The presence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in rice and rice products; and evaluation of dietary intake. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Iqbal, S.Z.; Asi, M.R.; Zuber, M.; Akhtar, J.; Saif, M.J. Natural occurrence of aflatoxins and ochratoxin A in commercial chilli and chilli sauce samples. Food Contr. 2013, 30, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 14 00642 g001 550
Figure 1. Graph showing the percentage of total aflatoxins in stored selected edible seed samples.
Figure 1. Graph showing the percentage of total aflatoxins in stored selected edible seed samples.
Toxins 14 00642 g001
Toxins 14 00642 g002 550
Figure 2. Graph showing the percentage of total aflatoxins in selected stored edible oil samples.
Figure 2. Graph showing the percentage of total aflatoxins in selected stored edible oil samples.
Toxins 14 00642 g002
Toxins 14 00642 g003 550
Figure 3. Average weight of different age groups from a (a) central Punjab, and (b) Southern Punjab population.
Figure 3. Average weight of different age groups from a (a) central Punjab, and (b) Southern Punjab population.
Toxins 14 00642 g003
Table
Table 1. Occurrence of aflatoxin B1 and total aflatoxins (µg/kg) in selected edible seeds available in markets.
Table 1. Occurrence of aflatoxin B1 and total aflatoxins (µg/kg) in selected edible seeds available in markets.
Sample Category6 ≤ Months Storage Period2 ≥ Years Storage Period
SamplesPositiveMean AFB1Mean AFsRange
Total AFs		SamplePositiveMean AFB1Mean AFsRange
Total AFs
nn (%)µg/kgµg/kgµg/kgnn (%)µg/kgµg/kgµg/kg
Sunflower 4528 (62.2)11.9 ± 2.5 14.3 ± 1.80 **LOD-98.65028 (56.0)15.1 ± 3.422.5 ± 6.5 ** LOD-112.5
Palm3014 (46.6)9.96 ± 2.411.7 ± 1.90 **LOD-65.53014 (46.6)16.5 ± 6.525.8 ± 7.4 **LOD-110.5
Peanut4521 (46.6)18.24 ± 3.420.9 ± 3.70 **LOD-98.64021 (52.5)28.2 ± 8.536.4 ± 9.1 **LOD-170.8
Sesame4514 (31.1)22.1 ± 2.5 24.6 ± 4.50 **LOD-60.54514 (31.1)28.6 ± 4.551.3 ± 10.4 **LOD-75.5
Cotton5023 (46.0)23.6 ± 4.525.3 ± 5.60 **LOD-125.84023 (57.5)26.2 ± 6.541.9 ± 9.4 **LOD-145.5
Grapeseed4525 (55.5)24.0 ± 4.629.1 ± 7.50 **LOD-175.55527 (49.0)27.8 ± 7.645.4 ± 11.3 **LOD-155.75
Total260125 (48.1) 260127 (48.8)
**: the differences in aflatoxins levels between storage periods in edible seeds were significant (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Occurrence of aflatoxin B1 and total aflatoxins in selected edible oil samples.
Table 2. Occurrence of aflatoxin B1 and total aflatoxins in selected edible oil samples.
Sample Category6 ≤ Months Storage Period2 ≥ Years Storage Period
SamplePositive SamplesMean AFB1Mean AFsRange
Total AFs		SamplesPositive SamplesMean AFB1 Mean AFsRange
Total AFs
nn (%)µg/kgµg/kgµg/kgnn (%)µg/kgµg/kgµg/kg
Sunflower4528 (62.2)9.19 ± 2.10 N.S10.81 ± 2.40 N.SLOD-78.55028 (56.0)11.96 ± 2.4013.70 ± 2.50 N.SLOD-95.5
Palm3014 (46.6)7.80 ± 1.70 **7.90 ± 3.15 **LOD-44.53014 (46.6)12.20 ± 3.20 **13.4 ± 3.90 **LOD-75.5
Peanut4521 (46.6)13.32 ± 2.70 **15.00 ± 3.20 ** LOD-70.54021 (52.5)21.43 ± 2.60 **25.96 ± 4.30 **LOD-150.5
Sesame4514 (31.1)18.77 ± 3.20 NS20.10 ± 3.50 N.SLOD-42.94514 (31.1)21.66 ± 4.50 NS23.79 ± 3.90 NSLOD-55.5
Cotton5023 (46.0)17.29 ± 2.40 **20.25 ± 3.80 **LOD-99.54025 (62.5)22.42 ± 3.50 **25.31 ± 3.60 ** LOD-122.5
Grapeseed4525 (55.5)6.25 ± 3.20 **6.48 ± 4.30 **LOD-33.55530 (54.5)12.17 ± 3.40 **14.42 ± 3.70 **LOD-110.5
Total260125 (48.1) 260132 (50.7)
N.S: the differences in aflatoxins levels between storage periods for edible seed oils were non-significant (p ≥ 0.05). ** the differences in aflatoxins levels between storage periods for edible seed oils were significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Estimation of dietary intake for AFs in sunflower oil in local population from Punjab, Pakistan.
Table 3. Estimation of dietary intake for AFs in sunflower oil in local population from Punjab, Pakistan.
CategoryType Central PunjabSouthern Punjab
Age GroupsAge Groups
16–2223–32≤3316–2223–32≥33
MeanMax.MeanMax.MeanMax.MeanMax.MeanMax.MeanMax.
≤6 Months StorageConsumption kg/day0.0027 0.0025 0.0041 0.0025 0.0027 0.049
AFs average amount (µg/kg)10.8178.510.8178.510.8178.510.8178.510.8178.510.8178.5
Dietary intake ng/kg/day0.533.900.453.300.614.500.533.900.453.307.353.2
≥2 Years StorageConsumption kg/day0.0027 0.0025 0.0049 0.0025 0.0027 0.049
AFs average amount (µg/kg)13.7095.513.7095.513.7095.513.7095.513.7095.513.7095.5
Dietary intake ng/kg/day0.745.100.574.000.866.000.684.701.6511.508.5559.60
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iqbal, S.Z.; Waqas, M.; Razis, A.F.A.; Usman, S.; Ali, N.B.; Asi, M.R. Variation of Aflatoxin Levels in Stored Edible Seed and Oil Samples and Risk Assessment in the Local Population. Toxins 2022, 14, 642. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins14090642

AMA Style

Iqbal SZ, Waqas M, Razis AFA, Usman S, Ali NB, Asi MR. Variation of Aflatoxin Levels in Stored Edible Seed and Oil Samples and Risk Assessment in the Local Population. Toxins. 2022; 14(9):642. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins14090642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iqbal, Shahzad Zafar, Muhammad Waqas, Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis, Sunusi Usman, Nada Basheir Ali, and Muhammad Rafique Asi. 2022. "Variation of Aflatoxin Levels in Stored Edible Seed and Oil Samples and Risk Assessment in the Local Population" Toxins 14, no. 9: 642. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins14090642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop