Next Article in Journal
Droplet Microfluidics for Food and Nutrition Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of p-SiC/n-GaN Hetero-Structural Double-Drift Region IMPATT Diode
Previous Article in Journal
Biocompatible MXene (Ti3C2Tx) Immobilized with Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide as an Electrochemical Transducer for Hydrogen Peroxide Detection in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Double-Quantum-Well AlGaN/GaN Field Effect Transistors with Top and Back Gates: Electrical and Noise Characteristics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Proton Irradiation on the Current Characteristics of SiN-Passivated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs Using a TMAH-Based Surface Pre-Treatment

1
Korea Multi-Purpose Accelerator Complex, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Gyeongju 38180, Korea
2
School of Electronic and Electric Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
3
Advanced Radiation Technology Institute, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Jeongeup 56212, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 5 July 2021 / Revised: 20 July 2021 / Accepted: 22 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GaN-Based Semiconductor Devices)

Abstract

:
This study investigated the combined effects of proton irradiation and surface pre-treatment on the current characteristics of Gallium Nitride (GaN)-based metal-insulator-semiconductor high-electron-mobility-transistors (MIS-HEMTs) to evaluate the radiation hardness involved with the Silicon Nitride (SiN) passivation/GaN cap interface. The impact of proton irradiation on the static and dynamic current characteristics of devices with and without pre-treatment were analyzed with 5 MeV proton irradiation. In terms of transfer characteristics before and after the proton irradiation, the drain current of the devices without and with pre-treatment were reduced by an increase in sheet and contact resistances after the proton irradiation. In contrast with the static current characteristics, the gate-lag characteristics of the device with pre-treatment were significantly degenerated. In the device with pre-treatment, the hydrogen passivation for surface states of the GaN cap was formed by the pre-treatment and SiN deposition processes. Since the hydrogen passivation was removed by the proton irradiation, the newly created vacancies resulted in the degeneration of gate-lag characteristics. After nine months in an ambient atmosphere, the gate-lag characteristics of the device with pre-treatment were recovered because of the hydrogen recombination. These results demonstrated that the radiation hardness of MIS-HEMTs was affected by the SiN/GaN interface quality.

1. Introduction

Gallium Nitride (GaN)-based devices have received attention for high-frequency and high-power applications due to their outstanding characteristics, such as low on-resistance (Ron) and high speed, which can be realized by two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG), formed by a AlGaN/GaN heterostructure [1,2,3]. Moreover, high-electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) or metal-insulator-semiconductor HEMTs (MIS-HEMTs) based on the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction have been studied for electronics in the space environments because of a remarkable radiation tolerance of GaN material [4,5,6]. Electronics used in harsh space environments must be resistant to damage or malfunctions caused by ionizing radiation. In order to evaluate radiation hardness, radiation irradiation effects on the device properties have been explored in MIS-HEMTs with various gate dielectric layers, namely, SiN/Al2O3 [7,8], SiN [9,10], Gd2O3 [11], MgO/Sc2O3 [12], and poly-AlN/SiN [13]. However, these researches have focused on the impact of dielectric on radiation resistance. The impact of the radiation on the performance of GaN devices dependent on the interface between passivation and the GaN layers have not been studied yet. The pre-treatment processes before the deposition passivation layer were applied to improve the performances of GaN-based devices. In SiN-passivated devices, the pre-treatment process is based on Tetramethylammonium(TMAH) [14], NH3 [15], H2SO4 [16] solutions, and N2 plasma [17] to enhance SiN/(Al)GaN interface quality because the interface quality affects device performance and reliability. The current collapse characteristics of the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction-based devices can be especially degraded by the surface state of the (Al)GaN layer.
This study evaluated the proton irradiation effect on SiN-passivated MIS-HEMTs that use the TMAH-based pre-treatment process, which was performed to improve the SiN passivation/GaN cap interface quality. To investigate the relationship between the interface conditions and irradiation damage, we analyzed the impact of proton irradiation and the pre-treatment process on the static and dynamic current characteristics of the devices. We also verified the recovery phenomenon of the devices by re-measuring current collapse characteristics after nine months.

2. Device Structure and Fabrication

Figure 1a shows the schematic cross-section of the SiN-passivated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMT. The epitaxial structure was created using metal-orgranic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) equipment (SYSNEX, Korea) on a sapphire substrate. The device consisted of a 2 μm-thick GaN buffer layer, 60 nm-thick GaN channel layer, 22 nm-thick AlGaN layer, and 2 nm-thick GaN cap layer. Al composition in the AlGaN layer was 0.25. Ssheet charge density of 1.42 × 1013 cm−2 and mobility of 1330 cm2/V·s were identified using Hall-effect measurement at room temperature. The overall process flow for the fabrication and proton irradiation is shown in Figure 1b.
The fabrication began with the dry etching process for electrical isolation between devices. The etched depth was about 250 nm. The wet treatment process based on a TMAH solution (5% concentration) was performed at a temperature of 90 °C. The TMAH solution selectively eliminates Ga atoms on the surface as the alkaline solution and Ga-polar surface is terminated with N atoms after the treatment [18]. Thus, the TMAH-based treatment process influences the removal of native Ga-oxide and enhances the surface roughness [19]. In a previous study, we also confirmed that the TMAH treatment reduced the leakage current characteristics by effectively removing surface states on the GaN cap layer [14]. To investigate effects of the pre-treatment on the surface, we set the treatment time as 0, 1, and 3 min. We used a photoresist developer containing TMAH (AZ 300 MIF) during the photolithography steps. However, the photoresist developer had little impact on the surface because the TMAH solution reacted with the GaN material at a high temperature of ~90 °C. The TMAH in the photoresist developer was not significantly affected on the surface. We then deposited 20 nm-thick SiN as a passivation and gate dielectric layer using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) (SINIC, Korea) at 370 °C. After the deposition of the SiN layer, source and drain contact were defined by the lithography and electron beam (e-beam) evaporator. After deposition of an Au/Ni/Al/Ti/Si multilayer, the metal layer was annealed using rapid thermal annealing (RTA) at 800 °C for 30 s in a N2 stmosphere. Finally, Ni/Al/Ni-based metallization was applied for the gate and pad. The current characteristics of completely fabricated devices were measured using a B1500 semiconductor device analyzer (Keysight, Santa Roda, California, USA). The gate length (LG) and gate-to-source distance (DGS) were 3 μm and 5 μm, respectively. The gate-to-drain distance (DGD) was designed to be 5, 10, 20, and 30 μm. The devices were irradiated by 5 MeV protons with a fluence of 1 × 1014 cm−2 using the RFT-30 cyclotron at the Advanced Radiation Technology Institute (ARTI). After proton irradiation, the devices were measured once again. The electrical characteristics of the devices before and after proton irradiation were compared and the effects of proton irradiation and pre-treatment on performances were analyzed. We verified an injection depth of 5 MeV protons using a simulator based on a Monte-Carlo calculation [20]. The protons with 5 MeV energy was injected up to a depth of 125 μm, generating vacancies.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows transfer drain current (ID) and transconductance (gm)-gate voltage (VG) characteristics at a drain voltage (VD) of 10 V of the MIS-HEMT without and with pre-treatment for pre- and post-irradiation. The ID and gm characteristics of both the devices slightly decreased.
The reduced ID and gm was due to the increase in sheet resistance and contact, as shown in Figure 3. The contact and sheet resistances of the devices increased after the proton irradiation because the 2DEG channel and contact were damaged by the injected protons. The proton irradiation generated defects such as Al, Ga, and N vacancies in the 2DEG channel. The defects caused a decrease in electron mobility and 2DEG sheet carrier density [21,22]. More energy loss was in the ohmic contact region due to the heavier mass of the Au atoms. The contact metal as well as the 2DEG region nearby was damaged by more scatter protons from the collisions with heavy atoms [23]. As a result, the increase in the 2DEG channel and contact resistance were caused by radiation-induced defects. A positive shift in threshold voltage (Vth) was observed after the proton irradiation. The Vth was defined as the VG intercept of the linear extrapolation of the ID at the point of peak gm (gm_max) [24], and the Vth of all the devices were extracted at the ID-VG at a low VD of 0.1 V. The variation rate of the Vth values before and after the proton irradiation (ΔVth) of the device without the pre-treatment was about +0.39 V. This is consistent with the results reported in Refs. [8,9]. The proton irradiation induced reduction in electron density within the 2DEG channel due to the displacement damage [25,26]. As a result, the positive shift in Vth was caused by the decreased electron density. The device with the treatment also exhibited a Vth shift of +0.35 V, as shown in Figure 2b. These results indicate that the 2DEG channel and contact resistances were degraded by the proton irradiation, irrespective of the pre-treatment process.
Figure 4a,b show the logarithmic scale ID and IG characteristics as a function of VG before and after the proton irradiation of the MIS-HEMTs with and without the pre-treatment. The off-state currents (Ioff) of both the devices were reduced more than IG. The values of IG were affected by the value of Ioff. This result indicated that the decrease in Ioff was affected by the leakage current, except for the IG. The Ioff of the MIS-HEMTs was formed by leakage current paths, including a buffer layer and the surface of the mesa-etched region [27,28].
We evaluated the buffer leakage current characteristics by measuring the current between ohmic contacts connecting the mesa-etched region, as shown in Figure 5a. In terms of buffer current characteristics before the irradiation, the structure with the treatment for 3 min was the lowest buffer current because of the enhanced SiN/GaN interface quality effects, as shown in Figure 5b. The buffer current was determined by the currents through the buffer layer and the SiN/GaN interface. A high buffer current of the structure without the treatment was induced by the leakage current path through the SiN/GaN interface, resulting from a large amount of surface states and traps related to the dangling bonds on the etched surface [29]. Because the treatment reduced these defects, the structure with the treatment obtained a relatively low buffer current. The structure with the treatment still exhibited the lowest buffer current of about 10−9 A/mm after the proton irradiation. The buffer currents of all structures were reduced to an almost equal rate of about 102. This result is due to the defects in the buffer generated by the proton irradiation. Because protons with an identical fluence of 1×1014 cm−2 were injected into the buffer structure, the proton irradiation generated defects such as Ga vacancies, which increased the resistance of the buffer layer. Consequentially, the decrease in the buffer current led to the reduction in Ioff of the MIS-HEMTs, as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 6a,b show the pulse-mode output ID-VD characteristics before and after the proton irradiation of the MIS-HEMTs without and with the treatment. The quiescent bias of the gate and drain (VG_B, VD_B) was 0 V. We verified the output ID-VD characteristics at the quiescent bias conditions (VG_B, VD_B = 0 V) to minimize the bias stress and self-heating effect [30]. The pulse period and width (Pperiod and Pwidth) in the pulse-mode measurement were 5 ms and 100 μs, respectively. The ID of the device after the proton irradiation was lower than that before the proton irradiation. This result was due to a positive shift of Vth as well as an increase in sheet and contact resistances. As shown in Figure 6c, all the devices exhibited higher on-resistance (Ron) after the proton irradiation than that of the devices before the proton irradiation because of the increased sheet and contact resistances. The variation of Ron as a function of DGD exhibited a steep slope because the sheet resistance of the access region became higher [31]. This result was consistent with the transmission line method (TLM) results.
Figure 7a exhibits the current collapse characteristics of the MIS-HEMTs before and after the proton irradiation. The quiescent biases of the gate and drain (VG_B, VD_B) were (0 V, 0 V), (−10 V, 0 V), (0 V, 20 V), and (−10 V, 20 V). The pulse period and width (Pperiod and Pwidth) were 5 ms and 100 μs, respectively. Before proton irradiation, the device with the pre-treatment exhibited a relatively less impact of gate bias stress on the current characteristics because of a better quality of the SiN/GaN interface. However, as the pre-treatment time increased, the gate-lag characteristics degenerated after the proton irradiation. As shown in Figure 7b, the Ron variation of the device with the pre-treatment for 3 min were significantly increased by the irradiation. The device with the pre-treatment for 3 min exhibited more damaged on the device surface with the irradiation, as shown in the microscopic image of Figure 7c. Compared to the gate-lag characteristics, the current characteristics of all the devices were hardly changed by the drain bias stress condition. These results indicated that the SiN/GaN interface was affected by the proton irradiation. The TMAH-based pre-treatment removed native Ga-oxide from the surface of the GaN cap layer and the surface became N-terminated. The adsorption of hydrogen can be enhanced by the N-terminated surface [32,33]. During the SiN deposition process, the surface was covered by the hydrogen in SiH4 or NH3 [34]. The hydrogen between the SiN/GaN interface was removed by the proton irradiation, which may generate high temperature or displacement damage. The removal of hydrogen passivation in the SiN/GaN interface forms defects and degenerates gate-lag characteristics.
As shown in Figure 8a, MIS-HEMTs with pre-treatment for 3 min exhibited a large increase in the rate in terms of gate-lag characteristics dependent on DGD. As DGD increased, the device exhibited a high variation in resistance because the impact of the drain bias on trapped electrons near the gate edge was reduced by a long DGD. Figure 8b shows the drain-lag characteristics of the MIS-HEMTs before and after the proton irradiation as a function of DGD. All the devices obtained a low variation rate of Ron after the proton irradiation because the Ron at VG_B = VD_B = 0 V was largely degraded more than Ron at VG_B = VD_B = 10 V.
Figure 9a shows the ID and gm characteristics as a function of VG of the device with the pre-treatment for 3 min before and after proton irradiation and nine months after the irradiation. We stored the devices in an ambient atmosphere for nine months. The degenerated ID and gm increased after nine months while Vth was hardly changed. Because the gm value is associated with channel mobility [35], the current characteristics were largely recovered by the recovered mobility. The unchanged Vth means no change in the 2DEG density. The gate-lag characteristics recovered over time, as shown in Figure 9b. These results indicated that the damaged SiN/GaN interface was reconstructed by the re-passivation of hydrogen. Hydrogen was diffused from SiN or the atmosphere to the SiN/GaN interface, and formed hydrogenated vacancies. The hydrogen from SiN and the hydrogen were able to recover the proton irradiation-generated defects [36]. Thus, the performance of the devices with the pre-treatment irradiated by the protons were recovered by the hydrogen passivation effects.

4. Conclusions

We studied the effects of proton irradiation on SiN-passivated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with a TMAH-based pre-treatment process for a fixed fluence of 1 × 1014 cm−2 at a proton energy of 5 MeV. The static ID characteristics of the devices decreased regardless of the implementation of a pre-treatment process because the increase in sheet and contact resistances was caused by radiation damage. The gate-lag characteristics of the device with the pre-treatment was remarkably degenerated after proton irradiation. The hydrogen in the SiN/GaN interface formed by the TMAH-based pre-treatment and SiN deposition process was removed by the injected protons. As a result, the degeneration of the gate-lag characteristics was induced by the generated vacancies. After nine months, the current and gate-lag characteristics of the device with pre-treatment were recovered by the hydrogen re-passivation. The results of this study confirmed that the conditions of the SiN/GaN interface affected the radiation hardness of SiN-passivated MIS-HEMTs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.J.Y. and D.S.K.; Investigation, Y.J.Y.; data analysis, Y.J.Y., J.S.L., J.K.S., I.M.K., J.H.L., E.J.L. and D.S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J.Y.; writing—review and editing, D.S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the KOMAC (Korea Multi-purpose Accelerator Complex) operation fund of KAERI (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (No.2018R1D1A1B07051027) by MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mishra, U.K.; Parikh, P.; Wu, Y.-F. AlGaN/GaN HEMTs-an overview of device operation and applications. Proc. IEEE 2002, 90, 1022–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ikeda, N.; Niiyama, Y.; Kambayashi, H.; Sato, Y.; Nomura, T.; Kato, S.; Yoshida, S. GaN Power Transistors on Si Substrates for Switching Applications. Proc. IEEE 2010, 98, 1151–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baliga, B.J. Gallium nitride devices for power electronic applications. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2013, 28, 074011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ionascut-Nedelcescu, A.; Carlone, C.; Houdayer, A.; Bardeleben, H.J.; Cantin, J.-L.; Raymond, S. Radiation hardness of gallium nitride. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2002, 49, 2733–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pearton, S.; Ren, F.; Patrick, E.; Law, M.E.; Polyakov, A.Y. Review—Ionizing Radiation Damage Effects on GaN Devices. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2016, 5, Q35–Q60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Weaver, B.D.; Anderson, T.J.; Koehler, A.D.; Greenlee, J.D.; Hite, J.; Shahin, D.I.; Kub, F.J.; Hobart, K.D. Editors’ Choice—On the Radiation Tolerance of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2016, 5, Q208–Q212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chang, S.-H.; Cho, K.J.; Jung, H.-W.; Kim, J.-J.; Jang, Y.-J.; Bae, S.-B.; Kim, D.-S.; Bae, Y.; Yoon, H.S.; Ahn, H.-K.; et al. Improvement of Proton Radiation Hardness Using ALD-Deposited Al2O3 Gate Insulator in GaN-Based MIS-HEMTs. ECS J. Solid State Sci. 2019, 8, Q245–Q248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, D.-S.; Kim, J.-G.; Ahn, W.-H.; Bae, Y.; Lee, J.-H. Effect of gate dielectrics on characteristics of high-energy proton-irradiated AlGaN/GaN MISHEMTs. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 184, 109473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fares, C.; Ren, F.; Pearton, S.; Yang, G.; Kim, J.; Lo, C.-F.; Johnson, J.W. Effect of proton irradiation energy on SiNx/AlGaN/GaN metal-insulator semiconductor high electron mobility transistors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2018, 36, 052202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, Z.; Romero, M.F.; Redondo-Cubero, A.; Pampillon, M.A.; Andres, E.S.; Calle, F. Effects of Gd2O3 Gate Dielectric on Proton-Irradiated AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, B.; Ren, F.; Allums, K.; Gila, B.; Onstine, A.; Abernathy, C.; Pearton, S.; Dwivedi, R.; Fogarty, T.; Wilkins, R.; et al. Proton irradiation of MgO- or Sc2O3 passivated AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors. Solid State Electron. 2003, 47, 1015–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, D.; Cheng, X.; Shen, L.; Zheng, L.; Gu, Z.; Zhou, W.; Liu, X.; Yu, Y. Influence of Poly-AlN Passivation on the Perfor-mance Improvement of 3-MeV Proton-Irradiated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2019, 66, 2215–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, J.; Feng, M.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, R.; Gao, H.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, Q.; Liu, J.; Huang, Y.; et al. On-wafer fabrication of cavity mirrors for InGaN-based laser diode grown on Si. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yoon, Y.J.; Seo, J.H.; Cho, M.S.; Kang, H.-S.; Won, C.-H.; Kang, I.M.; Lee, J.-H. TMAH-based wet surface pre-treatment for reduction of leakage current in AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs. Solid State Electron. 2016, 124, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Edwards, A.; Mittereder, J.; Binari, S.; Katzer, D.; Storm, D.; Roussos, J. Improved reliability of AlGaN-GaN HEMTs using an NH/sub 3/ plasma treatment prior to SiN passivation. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2005, 26, 225–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zaidi, Z.H.; Lee, K.B.; Guiney, I.; Qian, H.; Jiang, S.; Wallis, D.J.; Humphreys, C.J.; Houston, P.A. Sulfuric acid and hydro-gen peroxide surface passivation effects on AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 244501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Romero, M.; Brana, A.; Cuerdo, R.; Jimenez, A.; Miguel-Sanchez, J.; Gonzalez-Posada, F.; Gomez, F.C.; Munoz, E. Effects of N2N2 Plasma Pretreatment on the SiN Passivation of AlGaN/GaN HEMT. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2008, 29, 209–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reddy, M.S.P.; Park, W.-S.; Im, K.-S.; Lee, J.-H. Dual-Surface Modification of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs Using TMAH and Piranha Solutions for Enhancing Current and 1/f-Noise Characteristics. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2018, 6, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, K.-W.; Jung, S.-D.; Kim, D.-S.; Kang, H.-S.; Im, K.-S.; Oh, J.-J.; Ha, J.-B.; Shin, J.-K.; Lee, J.-H. Effects of TMAH Treatment on Device Performance of Normally Off Al2O3/GaN MOSFET. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2011, 32, 1376–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ziegler, J.F.; Ziegler, M.; Biersack, J. SRIM – The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2010, 268, 1818–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Polyakov, A.Y.; Pearton, S.; Frenzer, P.; Ren, F.; Liu, L.; Kim, J. Radiation effects in GaN materials and devices. J. Mater. Chem. C 2012, 1, 877–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Auret, F.D.; Goodman, S.A.; Koschnick, F.K.; Spaeth, J.-M.; Beaumont, B.; Gibart, P. Proton bombardment-induced electron traps in epitaxially grown n-GaN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74, 407–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, L.; Cuervo, C.V.; Xi, Y.; Ren, F.; Pearton, S.J.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, J.; Kravchenko, I.I. Impact of proton irradiation on dc performance of AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2013, 31, 042202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cai, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Lau, K.M.; Chen, K.J. Control of Threshold Voltage of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs by Fluoride-Based Plasma Treatment: From Depletion Mode to Enhancement Mode. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2006, 53, 2207–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Greenlee, J.D.; Specht, P.; Anderson, T.J.; Koehler, A.D.; Weaver, B.D.; Luysberg, M.; Dubon, O.D.; Kub, F.J.; Weatherford, T.R.; Hobart, K.D. Degradation mechanisms of 2 MeV proton irradiated AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 083504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kim, D.-S.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, J.-G.; Yoon, Y.J.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, J.-H. Anomalous DC Characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs De-pending on Proton Irradiation Energies. ECS J. Solid State Sci. 2020, 9, 065005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, Y.-S.; Lain, Y.-W.; Hsu, S. AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with Low Leakage Current and High On/Off Current Ratio. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2009, 31, 102–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, Z.; Wu, W.; Ma, X.; Zhang, J.; Hao, Y.; Wang, J.; Cai, Y.; Liu, J.; Jin, C.; Yang, Z.; et al. Enhancement Mode (E-Mode) AlGaN/GaN MOSFET With 10−1310−13 A/mm Leakage Current and 10121012 ON/OFF Current Ratio. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2014, 35, 1200–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Z.H.; Ng, G.I.; Zhou, H.; Arulkumaran, S.; Maung, Y.K.T. Reduced surface leakage current and trapping effects in Al-GaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors on silicon with SiN/Al2O3 passivation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 113506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, X.-D.; Hu, W.-D.; Chen, X.-S.; Lu, W. The Study of Self-Heating and Hot-Electron Effects for AlGaN/GaN Dou-ble-Channel HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 1393–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ohi, K.; Asubar, J.; Nishiguchi, K.; Hashizume, T. Current Stability in Multi-Mesa-Channel AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 2997–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Northrup, J.E.; Neugebauer, J. Strong affinity of hydrogen for the GaN(000-1) surface: Implications for molecular beam epitaxy and metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 3429–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.-L.; Ren, F.; Zhang, U.; Sun, Q.; Yerino, C.D.; Ko, T.S.; Cho, Y.S.; Lee, I.H.; Han, J.; Pearton, S.J. Improved hydro-gen detection sensitivity in N-polar GaN Schottky diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 212108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lelievre, J.-F.; Fourmond, E.; Kaminski, A.; Palais, O.; Ballutaud, D.; Lemiti, M. Study of the composition of hydrogenated silicon nitride SiNx:H for efficient surface and bulk passivation of silicon. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Vitanov, S.; Palankovski, V.; Maroldt, S.; Quay, R.; Murad, S.; Rodle, T.; Selberherr, S. Physics-Based Modeling of GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, Z.; Yue, S.; Peng, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, C.; Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; He, Y.; Zhong, X.; et al. Hydrogen-Related Recovery Effect of AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors Irradiated by High-Fluence Protons. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2021, 68, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic cross-section of the SiN-passivated AlGaN/GaN metal-insulator-semiconductor high-electron mobility transistor (MIS-HEMT). (b) Process flow for the fabrication and proton irradiation.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic cross-section of the SiN-passivated AlGaN/GaN metal-insulator-semiconductor high-electron mobility transistor (MIS-HEMT). (b) Process flow for the fabrication and proton irradiation.
Micromachines 12 00864 g001
Figure 2. ID and gm characteristics as a function of VG before and after 5 MeV proton irradiation of the MIS-HEMTs (a) without treatment and (b) with treatment for 3 min at a VD of 10 V. The LG, DGS, and DGD of the device were 3, 5, and 5 μm, respectively.
Figure 2. ID and gm characteristics as a function of VG before and after 5 MeV proton irradiation of the MIS-HEMTs (a) without treatment and (b) with treatment for 3 min at a VD of 10 V. The LG, DGS, and DGD of the device were 3, 5, and 5 μm, respectively.
Micromachines 12 00864 g002
Figure 3. Sheet and contact resistances obtained from the transmission line method (TLM) of samples with and without treatment for 3 min before and after the proton irradiation.
Figure 3. Sheet and contact resistances obtained from the transmission line method (TLM) of samples with and without treatment for 3 min before and after the proton irradiation.
Micromachines 12 00864 g003
Figure 4. ID and IG characteristics as a function of VG before and after the proton irradiation of the MIS-HEMTs (a) without the treatment and (b) with treatment for 3 min at a VD of 10 V.
Figure 4. ID and IG characteristics as a function of VG before and after the proton irradiation of the MIS-HEMTs (a) without the treatment and (b) with treatment for 3 min at a VD of 10 V.
Micromachines 12 00864 g004
Figure 5. (a) Schematic structure for measurement of the buffer current. (b) Buffer current characteristics of the structure with and without treatment for 1 and 3 min before and after the proton irradiation.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic structure for measurement of the buffer current. (b) Buffer current characteristics of the structure with and without treatment for 1 and 3 min before and after the proton irradiation.
Micromachines 12 00864 g005
Figure 6. Pulse-mode output ID-VD characteristics of the MIS-HEMTs (a) without treatment and (b) with treatment for 3 min before and after the proton irradiation. The LG, DGS, and DGD of the device was 3, 5, and 5 μm, respectively. (c) Variation of Ron as a function of DGD. The VG_B and VD_B were 0 V. The Pperiod and Pwidth were 5 ms and 100 μs, respectively.
Figure 6. Pulse-mode output ID-VD characteristics of the MIS-HEMTs (a) without treatment and (b) with treatment for 3 min before and after the proton irradiation. The LG, DGS, and DGD of the device was 3, 5, and 5 μm, respectively. (c) Variation of Ron as a function of DGD. The VG_B and VD_B were 0 V. The Pperiod and Pwidth were 5 ms and 100 μs, respectively.
Micromachines 12 00864 g006
Figure 7. (a) Current collapse characteristics of the MIS-HEMTs before and after proton irradiation. (b) Variation rates of Ron depending on different stress bias conditions. The VG_B and VD_B were (0 V, 0 V), (−10 V, 0 V), (0 V, 20 V), and (−10 V, 20 V). The Pperiod and Pwidth were 5 ms and 100 μs, respectively. The LG, DGS, and DGD of the device were 3, 5, and 5 μm, respectively. (c) Optical microscope image after irradiation of the devices with and without treatment.
Figure 7. (a) Current collapse characteristics of the MIS-HEMTs before and after proton irradiation. (b) Variation rates of Ron depending on different stress bias conditions. The VG_B and VD_B were (0 V, 0 V), (−10 V, 0 V), (0 V, 20 V), and (−10 V, 20 V). The Pperiod and Pwidth were 5 ms and 100 μs, respectively. The LG, DGS, and DGD of the device were 3, 5, and 5 μm, respectively. (c) Optical microscope image after irradiation of the devices with and without treatment.
Micromachines 12 00864 g007aMicromachines 12 00864 g007b
Figure 8. Variation in rates of Ron depending on (a) gate and (b) drain stress bias conditions of the MIS-HEMTs with different values of DGD. The Pperiod and Pwidth were 5 ms and 100 μs, respectively.
Figure 8. Variation in rates of Ron depending on (a) gate and (b) drain stress bias conditions of the MIS-HEMTs with different values of DGD. The Pperiod and Pwidth were 5 ms and 100 μs, respectively.
Micromachines 12 00864 g008
Figure 9. (a) ID and gm characteristics as a function of VG at a low VD of 0.1 V and (b) gate-lag characteristics of the MIS-HEMTs with treatment for 3 min before and after irradiation, and after nine months.
Figure 9. (a) ID and gm characteristics as a function of VG at a low VD of 0.1 V and (b) gate-lag characteristics of the MIS-HEMTs with treatment for 3 min before and after irradiation, and after nine months.
Micromachines 12 00864 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoon, Y.J.; Lee, J.S.; Suk, J.K.; Kang, I.M.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, E.J.; Kim, D.S. Effects of Proton Irradiation on the Current Characteristics of SiN-Passivated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs Using a TMAH-Based Surface Pre-Treatment. Micromachines 2021, 12, 864. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/mi12080864

AMA Style

Yoon YJ, Lee JS, Suk JK, Kang IM, Lee JH, Lee EJ, Kim DS. Effects of Proton Irradiation on the Current Characteristics of SiN-Passivated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs Using a TMAH-Based Surface Pre-Treatment. Micromachines. 2021; 12(8):864. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/mi12080864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoon, Young Jun, Jae Sang Lee, Jae Kwon Suk, In Man Kang, Jung Hee Lee, Eun Je Lee, and Dong Seok Kim. 2021. "Effects of Proton Irradiation on the Current Characteristics of SiN-Passivated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs Using a TMAH-Based Surface Pre-Treatment" Micromachines 12, no. 8: 864. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/mi12080864

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop