Next Article in Journal
Karyopherin-β1 Regulates Radioresistance and Radiation-Increased Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Human Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
Current Landscape of Breast Cancer Imaging and Potential Quantitative Imaging Markers of Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancers Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Approach for Quantifying Cancer Cells Showing Hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal States in Large Series of Tissue Samples: Towards a New Prognostic Marker
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Emerging Role of ESR1 Mutations in Luminal Breast Cancer as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker of Response to Endocrine Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/cancers12040907
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Estrogen Receptors Alpha and Beta in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

by
Alessia Roma
and
Paul A. Spagnuolo
*
Department of Food Science, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd., Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(4), 907; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers12040907
Submission received: 24 February 2020 / Revised: 24 March 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 8 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Estrogen Receptor (ER) Signalling Pathway in Cancers)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling has been widely studied in a variety of solid tumors, where the differential expression of ERα and ERβ subtypes can impact prognosis. ER signaling has only recently emerged as a target of interest in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive hematological malignancy with sub-optimal therapeutic options and poor clinical outcomes. In a variety of tumors, ERα activation has proliferative effects, while ERβ targeting results in cell senescence or death. Aberrant ER expression and hypermethylation have been characterized in AML, making ER targeting in this disease of great interest. This review describes the expression patterns of ERα and ERβ in AML and discusses the differing signaling pathways associated with each of these receptors. Furthermore, we assess how these signaling pathways can be targeted by various selective estrogen receptor modulators to induce AML cell death. We also provide insight into ER targeting in AML and discuss pending questions that require further study.

1. Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults, accounting for approximately 21,000 new diagnoses annually in the U.S. [1]. It is an aggressive hematological malignancy characterized by the accumulation of immature myeloid cells in the blood and bone marrow that impairs normal hematological and immune functions [2]. During hematopoiesis, mature blood cells with specific but varying functions are created through a highly regulated and hierarchal process originating from a self-renewing hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) (i.e., through differentiation) [3]. Similarly, AML is initiated from a rare population of cells known as leukemia stem cells (LSCs), which are quiescent and resistant to typical chemotherapeutics that target mitotic replication [4].
AML can result from an accumulation of genetic mutations, chromosomal translocations and/or epigenetic modifications that occur in numerous combinations and are unique from patient to patient [5]. This variability in disease pathology results in limited therapy options and poor patient outcomes. In fact, the most common treatment for AML is the “7 + 3” regimen of the DNA-targeting drugs cytarabine and daunorubicin, which has remained essentially unchanged for almost 50 years [6]. Furthermore, this regimen is unselective and often intolerable in older patients (>60 years of age), resulting in a 5-year survival rate of only 5%–10% in this population [7]. As such, investigations into novel anti-AML drug-able targets are highly needed.
Estrogen signaling occurs through two estrogen receptors (ERs): ERα and ERβ, which are encoded by the ESR1 and ESR2 genes, respectively [8]. Although ERα was previously thought to be the only ER, the discovery of ERβ in 1996 showed that ERs can have unique functions and varied tissue distributions [9,10]. Generally, ERα exerts a pro-growth effect and is highly expressed in pituitary, vaginal and uterine tissues [11,12]. In contrast, ERβ has anti-proliferative effects and is largely expressed in bone marrow stem cells and lung, colon, mammary gland and prostate tissues [13,14,15,16,17]. ERs regulate transcription through the recruitment of transcriptional coregulators that act as either coactivators or corepressors of genes [18]. Only a subset of these coregulators are common between the two receptor subtypes, which may contribute to their distinct actions [19,20]. The various roles of estrogens have also been demonstrated in several tumor types. In a subset of breast and prostate cancers, ERα expression increases with disease progression, whereestradiol (E2), the principal estrogen hormone, produces tumorigenic effects. By contrast, in colon cancer, where ERβ is predominantly expressed, estradiol has protective effects against malignant transformation [18].
Although AML is not a sex-hormone-related disease, interest in the possible involvement of estrogen and estrogen receptors in AML has stemmed from several epidemiological studies showing sex differences in the incidence of hematological malignancies. Men are approximately two times more likely to be diagnosed with acute or chronic lymphocytic leukemia and various lymphomas, suggesting that estrogen may play a protective role in the development of these diseases [21,22]. Differential expression and ER function in normal and aberrant hematopoiesis have since been studied to better characterize estrogen involvement in disease etiology and progression. In addition, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), a class of compounds that interact with ERs, have been studied for their effects in treating AML. This review summarizes these findings and provides an overview of the preclinical success of various SERMS.

2. ERs in Hematopoiesis

Estrogen signaling has emerged as an important factor in hematopoiesis within the last decade. Sex differences in HSCs show a direct role of estrogen in HSC maintenance and growth. In ovariectomized female rats, the number of HSCs and colony forming units of bone marrow cells are significantly reduced, which suggests that estrogen is required for normal hematopoiesis [23]. Similarly, a study in mice showed that HSCs divide more frequently in females than in males and that exogenous administration of estradiol increased HSC numbers in both males and females [24]. Furthermore, increased HSC numbers occur even without increased bone mass, suggesting that estrogen impacts HSCs independently of its actions on bone [25]. These effects are likely to be mediated through ERα and not ERβ, as this phenotype was lost in ESR1 (ESR1−/−) but not in ESR2 (ESR2−/−) knock-out mice [25]. Indeed, the ERα activation of HSCs results in the activation of c-myc, the upregulation of its related target genes and a downregulation of c-kit. These transcription factors are highly involved in hematopoiesis and control balance between HSC self-renewal and differentiation [26,27,28]. Not surprisingly, the modulation of c-kit and c-myc was accompanied by increased HSC cell-cycling and a decreased self-renewal capacity of long-term HSCs (LT-HSC) [25,29]. By contrast, multipotent progenitors (MPP) become apoptotic upon ERα activation, suggesting a differential effect of estrogen signaling in hematopoietic cells that may depend on the proliferative capacity or state of differentiation [29]. The role for ERα but not ERβ in HSCs may result from the low-to-non-existent expression of ERβ in murine HSCs, in which the majority of studies were conducted. As such, further insights can be obtained from human-derived HSCs, which express both ER subtypes [30]. In one study using human-derived pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) and umbilical cord blood cells (UCBs), E2 improved hPSC differentiation in an ERα-dependent pathway, as these effects were not replicated when a specific ERβ agonist was used [31]. Both ERs are expressed in B cells, T cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, erythrocytes and megakaryocytes, suggesting a possible role for ERs in regulating these cell types [32,33,34]. In fact, via ERα, E2 increases the transcription of the interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) to promote dendritic cell differentiation [35,36]. Additionally, ERα but not ERβ activation caused increased erythropoiesis in mice, which is attributed to ERα binding and inhibiting GATA-1, an erythroid transcription factor whose expression increases with erythroid maturation [24,37]. GATA-1 inhibition induced the apoptosis of erythroid cells; however, this was offset by the increased generation of megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors (MEPs) [24]. By contrast, in megakaryocytes, binding of ERβ to GATA-1 results in increased transcription, which is necessary to promote megakaryocyte polyploidization and platelet formation [38].
These studies, summarized in Figure 1, show that although ERα is largely involved in regulating proliferation and self-renewal of HSCs emerging evidence suggests that both ERα and ERβ may be involved in regulating transcription factors associated with differentiation. Nevertheless, ERs play an important role in regulating physiological immune cell function and HSC maintenance; therefore, it is of interest to understand whether ERs are also involved in pathophysiological processes like AML.

3. Estrogen Receptor-α in AML

ERα is expressed in a subset of patient-derived AML cells [39,40]. The relationship between ERα and AML first came to light in 1996, when researchers discovered that the ERα CpG island is aberrantly methylated in 86% of all hematopoietic neoplasms and 91% of AML samples (Figure 1) [41]. Since then, numerous studies with different patient cohorts have corroborated this phenomenon [42,43,44]. ERα methylation (ERM) is most commonly observed in normal karyotype AML and leads to repressed ERα gene transcription [45]. Although frequently observed, there is no consensus regarding the effects of ERM on overall survival and prognosis. One study showed that ERα hypermethylation improved AML survival rates [42], while more recent studies have found no correlation [45] or that ERM worsens survival [46]. ERM was also observed in samples from patients in clinical remission, where increased methylation was associated with a higher risk of relapse [44]. Conclusions regarding ERM and survival are likely to be confounded because ERM frequently co-occurs with epigenetic modifications of tumor suppressor genes involved in various pathways regulating cell growth [47]. However, despite the discrepancies in ERM and overall survival, a relationship between ERM and age has been consistently demonstrated in AML [42]. In contrast to other cancers, ERM is inversely correlated with aging suggesting that methylation may be a result of certain carcinogenic insults rather than an accumulation thereof [42]. Interestingly, of the 54 genes commonly associated with driving AML, 35% have shown evidence of being regulated by ERα and E2 (compared to 65% in breast cancer) [48]. This evidence suggests that aberrations in ERα are commonly found in AML patients but, unlike in breast cancer, are not solely responsible for initiating and maintaining disease. The unique interplay between ERM and other epigenetic modifications must be considered when interpreting data related to ERM and AML. The treatment of hypermethylation in AML is achieved with demethylating agents like azacytidine but has only resulted in mild success. However, predictors of a poor response include the co-occurrence of methylated pro-apoptotic and cell cycle genes [49]. These results show that ERM status alone cannot be used to inform treatment regimens.

4. Estrogen Receptor-β in AML

ERβ activation results in pro-death signaling in solid tumors [50,51]. It was also shown to be the predominant ER in lymphoma where its activation strongly inhibited tumor growth [52]. In AML, ERβ is more highly expressed than ERα in some AML patient gene sets [53,54]. Furthermore, we found a subset of AML patients (TCGA) with an increased ERβ/ERα ratio [40]. This, taken together with the prevalent ERα methylation in AML samples, may suggest that ERβ is more predominant in AML. Despite this and recent advances in characterizing the effects of ERβ in normal hematopoiesis, there are many questions about the role of ERβ in AML. Disruption of the ESR2 gene in mice (ERβ−/−) resulted in hypercellularity of the bone marrow and myeloproliferative neoplasia resembling chronic myeloid leukemia (Figure 1) [17]. A subsequent study by our group showed that high ERβ/ERα ratios were necessary for the anti-leukemic effects of ERβ signaling (discussed further below) [40]. Although data relating to ERβ in AML are limited, ERβ agonists have shown preclinical effectiveness in solid tumors [55,56,57,58]. In fact, studies in other tumor types with similar ER expression patterns provide further insight into ERβ’s actions in malignancy. In colon cancer, ERβ is predominantly expressed and a positive correlation between this expression and apoptosis is observed [59,60]. ERβ-mediated apoptosis co-occurs with increased DNA fragmentation, increased p53 signaling and the repression of c-myc related pathways [61,62,63]. Additionally, in prostate and bladder cancers, ERβ represses NFκB activation and decreases downstream targets such as the antiapoptotic protein, BCL-2 [64,65]. Interestingly, the aberrant amplification of both c-myc and NFκB occurs in AML; therefore, whether ERβ targeting in AML involves these pathways should be studied further [66,67]. These studies provide encouraging evidence to support future investigations into the anti-leukemic potential of ERβ agonists in AML.

5. AML and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs)

5.1. Tamoxifen

Tamoxifen is a SERM with tissue-specific agonist and antagonist activities. Tamoxifen is an ERα antagonist and ERβ agonist in the breast where its antiestrogenic activity is used to treat ERα-positive breast cancer [68]. By contrast, tamoxifen is an ER agonist in other tissues such as the endometrium, bone and, notably, HSCs [69]. In HSCs, the tamoxifen-mediated activation of ER signaling results in proliferation and differentiation in an ERα-dependent manner [29]. Moreover, tamoxifen induces apoptosis in short-term HSCs and MPPs in mice with no effect on their hematological parameters [29], which suggests a differential effect of ERα activation in hematopoiesis whereby primitive cells become more proliferative and less primitive cells become apoptotic. The authors hypothesized that this differential effect could perhaps be exploited in hematological malignancies and subsequently tested tamoxifen on a mouse model of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Here, treatment with tamoxifen in Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation-induced MPN caused a significant reduction in disease development and eliminated all of the commonly associated phenotypes of the disease including erythrocytosis, thrombocytosis and leukocytosis [29]. Similarly, in an MLL-AF9 mouse model of AML, tamoxifen improved sensitivity to doxycycline and delayed the reappearance of circulating leukemia cells after chemotherapy [29,70]. In both models, tamoxifen induced apoptosis in malignant cells or restored the levels of HSCs to normal [70]. Interestingly, tamoxifen-induced AML cell apoptosis was preceded by a decrease in mitochondrial respiration and spare reserve capacity, which are directly linked to AML cell survival [71,72]. Despite this, tamoxifen’s pro-apoptotic effects are likely derived from a combination of both ER signaling and metabolic targeting since its effects on HSCs are ERα-dependent. Nevertheless, studies with tamoxifen in ESR1-/- leukemia cells should be conducted to confirm this hypothesis. In another study, tamoxifen and the sphingolipid, C6-ceramide, synergistically induced apoptosis in AML cells and primary samples while sparing normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) [73]. The combination was preceded by the inhibition of complex I mediated mitochondrial respiration and decreases in ATP synthesis and mitochondrial membrane polarization. Tamoxifen is thought to enhance C6-ceramide cytotoxicity by suppressing its drug metabolism, thereby enhancing its anti-tumor effect [74]. Tamoxifen also improves the all-trans-retinoic acid-induced differentiation of acute promyelocytic HL-60 cells [75] through an ER-related mechanism [76]. These findings, summarized in Table 1, provide support for further studies on the anti-leukemic potential of tamoxifen with an emphasis on characterizing the interplay between ERα and metabolic targeting.

5.2. Diosmetin

Diosmetin is a member of the phytoestrogens, which are secondary plant metabolites that are structurally and functionally similar to mammalian estrogen and thus exert estrogenic activity [88]. The anti-leukemic action of diosmetin was demonstrated by our lab using in vitro and in vivo models of AML. We found that it was an ERβ agonist and selectively targeted leukemia blasts and stem cells [40]. Diosmetin’s activity was mediated by ERβ expression, as patient-derived AML cells and cell lines with low levels of ERβ were insensitive to treatment. Furthermore, knockdown of ERβ rendered cells insensitive to diosmetin while ERβ-inducible cells became sensitive to diosmetin upon the induction of ERβ expression [40].
Diosmetin inhibited the primary and secondary engraftment of patient-derived AML cells with no effect on normal CD34+ cell engraftment [40]. ERβ activation by diosmetin led to an intracellular accumulation of the pro-apoptotic cytokine TNFα that then resulted in caspase 8 activation and initiation of the extrinsic death receptor-mediated apoptotic pathway [77]. Earlier studies showed that ERβ-expressing monocytes similarly exhibit a TNFα-mediated activation of extrinsic apoptosis that is lost during differentiation to macrophages, which only express ERα [89]. We comparably found that ERβ expression is required for TNFα accumulation and that TNFα mediates diosmetin-induced anti-leukemic activity, as co-incubation with a TNFα-neutralizing antibody abrogated its effects [77]. Taken together, these studies (Table 1) highlight a mechanism by which ERβ activation by diosmetin leads to the selective apoptosis of leukemia cells. Clinical studies in AML patients with high ERβ and low ERα expression are warranted and would provide greater evidence for the potential of ERβ targeting in AML.

5.3. Genistein

Genistein is a phytoestrogen found mainly in soy [90]. A common hypothesis is that it contributes to the lower incidence of breast and prostate cancers in Asian countries, due to their high consumption of soy products [91,92]. At a molecular level, it interacts with both ERα and ERβ but is reported to have a greater affinity for ERβ [20]. Genistein exhibits anticancer effects in vitro and in vivo in models of breast [93], colon [94], lung [95], liver [96] and stomach [97] cancer, where it targets ERs, several tyrosine kinases and pro-apoptotic factors [98]. In AML, preclinical studies have shown that it induces cell death in a variety of leukemia cell lines and that a genistein-rich diet improves survival in leukemia-bearing mice [78]. Mechanistically, it has been shown to cause G2/M cell cycle arrest, increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, cause mitochondrial membrane polarization, reduce protein synthesis through inhibition of mTOR, and change the BAX/Bcl2 ratio, leading to apoptosis [79,80,81]. Additionally, genistein and other polyphenols can enhance the anti-AML action of the glycolytic inhibitors 2-deoxy-D-glucose and lonidamine by inhibiting the compensatory activation of protein kinases such as Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) [82]. Although these findings (summarized in Table 1) provide encouraging evidence for genistein as an anti-leukemia agent, further studies characterizing the functional importance of ERs in these mechanisms of cell death are needed.

5.4. Quercetin

Quercetin is a flavanol with estrogenic activity that naturally occurs in many fruits and vegetables [99]. Similar to genistein, quercetin is an agonist for both ERα and ERβ but has a greater affinity for ERβ [100,101]. With these properties, a low ERβ/ERα ratio is necessary for quercetin to confer an anti-proliferative effect, which has been demonstrated in many cancer types to occur through the activation of apoptosis-related mechanisms (i.e., BAX translocation and caspase activation; see Rauf et al. for a comprehensive review) [102]. Studies done in the early 1990s first showed the potential of quercetin to inhibit leukemia cell growth. In patient-derived AML cells, quercetin had a high affinity for a type II ER binding site (i.e., prior to the discovery of ERβ, this was thought to be a site of preferential ER binding for phytoestrogens over estradiol) and a direct correlation between binding to this site and reduced AML cell proliferation was found [39]. They subsequently found that quercetin inhibited the clonogenic growth of patient-derived AML samples with little effect in normal bone marrow samples [83]. Interestingly, these normal bone marrow cells became sensitive to quercetin when the CD34+ fraction was removed, suggesting that hematopoietic progenitors are insensitive to quercetin [83,84]. More recent studies have provided greater insight into the modes of action for leukemia targeting (Table 1). In AML cell lines and tumor xenografts, quercetin reduced tumor growth through ROS-dependent apoptosis that was preceded by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage and the activation of caspases 3, 8 and 9 [85]. This effect was partly mediated by ERK activation, as co-incubation with an ERK inhibitor partially abrogated quercetin-induced apoptosis [85]. A recent study also showed that the enhancement of apoptosis by quercetin may partly be caused by the inactivation of DNA methylases resulting from the proteasomal degradation of class I histone deacetylases (HDACs), which leads to increased histone acetylation in the promotor regions of pro-apoptotic genes [86]. In particular, this led to the increased transcription of DAPK1, BCL2L11, BAX, APAF1, BNIP3 and BNIP3L, which promoted AML cell apoptosis [86]. In another study, quercetin sensitized AML cells to TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), which activates extrinsic death-receptor mediated apoptosis [87]. The authors of this study report that the TRAIL sensitization by quercetin was a result of the upregulation of death receptor genes DR4 and DR5 and the reduced expression of p65 and the anti-apoptotic proteins XIAP, c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 [87]. While the authors did not correlate these findings with ER activation and expression, this report echoes findings from our lab in relation to the diosmetin-induced activation of ERβ and TNFα-mediated cell death. Collectively, a likely mechanism of activity is through quercetin-induced transcriptional changes following quercetin’s activation of ERβ; however, functional studies to better characterize the role of ERs in quercetin-induced AML cell apoptosis are needed.

6. Conclusions

AML is an aggressive disease that requires new drug targets and therapeutic options. Although not regarded as a sex-hormone-related disease, epidemiological and preclinical studies provide compelling data to support ER targeting in AML. Studies have shown that ERα activation enhances the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutics and that ERβ suppresses leukemogenesis and reduces leukemia cell growth.
In considering ER targeting as an anti-leukemia strategy, it is imperative that the ERβ/ERα ratio in the tested population is known and that the binding of the ER modulator is well defined. Since ERα and ERβ exert opposing actions, ideal drug candidates should be subtype-specific. Furthermore, current evidence provides greater support for specific ERβ agonists as ideal drug candidates, given their anti-proliferative effects in several solid tumors and in AML. Phytoestrogens are of great interest in targeting ERβ, as many of them have demonstrated preferential binding to ERβ over ERα [103]. Synthetic ERβ-specific agonists, like diarylpropionitrile, have demonstrated efficacy in lymphoma but have not yet been studied in AML [52].
Mechanistic studies show that ER modulators activate apoptotic mechanisms, cause mitochondrial dysfunction, or modulate protein kinase signaling and result in cell death. While most studies are correlative, few have demonstrated the functional importance of ER signaling to mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis [70,77]. Given that these processes are often deregulated in AML [104,105,106], it would be of great interest to further characterize the importance of ER signaling in this devastating disease. With this, unique treatment regimens with ERβ agonists alone or in combination with apoptotic and/or metabolic modulators could be investigated for their potential to improve AML patient outcome.

Author Contributions

A.R. and P.A.S. both contributed to the writing, review and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

P.A.S. is funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research and Cancer Research Society.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AMLAcute myeloid leukemia
APAF1Apoptotic peptidase activating factor
BAXBcl-2-associated X protein
BCL2B-cell lymphoma 2
BNIPBCL2 Interacting Protein
c-IAPCellular inhibitor of apoptosis
DAPK1Death-associated protein kinase 1
DRDeath receptor
E2Estradiol
EREstrogen receptor
ERKExtracellular signal-regulated kinase
ERMEstrogen receptor alpha methylation
GATA-1GATA-binding factor 1
HDACHistone deacetylase
hPSCHuman pluripotent stem cell
HSCHematopoietic stem cell
IRF4Interferon regulatory factor 4
JAK2Janus kinase 2
LSCLeukemia stem cell
LT-HSCLong term hematopoietic stem cell
MPNMyeloproliferative neoplasm
MPPMultipotent progenitor
mTORMammalian target of rapamycin
NFκBNuclear factor kappa B
PARPPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase
PBMCPeripheral blood mononuclear cell
ROSReactive oxygen species
SERMSelective estrogen receptor modulator
SMACSecond mitochondria-derived activator of caspase
TCGAThe Cancer Genome Atlas
TRAILTNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand
UCBUmbilical cord blood cells
XIAPX-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein

References

  1. O’Donnell, M.R.; Tallman, M.S.; Abboud, C.N.; Altman, J.K.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Arber, D.A.; Attar, E.; Borate, U.; Coutre, S.E.; Damon, L.E.; et al. Acute myeloid leukemia, version 2.2013. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2013, 11, 1047–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dohner, H.; Weisdorf, D.J.; Bloomfield, C.D. Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1136–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Notta, F.; Zandi, S.; Takayama, N.; Dobson, S.; Gan, O.I.; Wilson, G.; Kaufmann, K.B.; McLeod, J.; Laurenti, E.; Dunant, C.F.; et al. Distinct routes of lineage development reshape the human blood hierarchy across ontogeny. Science 2016, 351, aab2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bonnet, D.; Dick, J.E. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat. Med. 1997, 3, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Patel, J.P.; Gönen, M.; Figueroa, M.E.; Fernandez, H.; Sun, Z.; Racevskis, J.; Van Vlierberghe, P.; Dolgalev, I.; Thomas, S.; Aminova, O.; et al. Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lichtman, M.A. A historical perspective on the development of the cytarabine (7days) and daunorubicin (3days) treatment regimen for acute myelogenous leukemia: 2013 the 40th anniversary of 7+3. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2013, 50, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yanada, M.; Naoe, T. Acute myeloid leukemia in older adults. Int. J. Hematol. 2012, 96, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gustafsson, J.Å. What pharmacologists can learn from recent advances in estrogen signalling. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2003, 24, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mosselman, S.; Polman, J.; Dijkema, R. ERβ: Identification and characterization of a novel human estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett. 1996, 392, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Heldring, N.; Pike, A.; Andersson, S.; Matthews, J.; Cheng, G.; Treuter, E.; Warner, M.; Hartman, J.; Tujague, M.; Stro, A. Estrogen Receptors : How Do They Signal and What Are Their Targets. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 905–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hillisch, A.; Peters, O.; Kosemund, D.; Müller, G.; Walter, A.; Schneider, B.; Reddersen, G.; Elger, W.; Fritzemeier, K.-H. Dissecting physiological roles of estrogen receptor alpha and beta with potent selective ligands from structure-based design. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004, 18, 1599–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hewitt, S.C.; Harrell, J.C.; Korach, K.S. Lessons in Estrogen Biology from Knockout and Transgenic Animals. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2005, 67, 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Morani, A.; Barros, R.P.A.; Imamov, O.; Hultenby, K.; Arner, A.; Warner, M.; Gustafsson, J.-A. Lung dysfunction causes systemic hypoxia in estrogen receptor beta knockout (ERbeta-/-) mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 7165–7169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Imamov, O.; Morani, A.; Shim, G.-J.; Omoto, Y.; Thulin-Andersson, C.; Warner, M.; Gustafsson, J.-A. Estrogen receptor beta regulates epithelial cellular differentiation in the mouse ventral prostate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 9375–9380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Wada-Hiraike, O.; Imamov, O.; Hiraike, H.; Hultenby, K.; Schwend, T.; Omoto, Y.; Warner, M.; Gustafsson, J.-A. Role of estrogen receptor beta in colonic epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 2959–2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cheng, G.; Li, Y.; Omoto, Y.; Wang, Y.; Berg, T.; Nord, M.; Vihko, P.; Warner, M.; Piao, Y.-S.; Gustafsson, J.-A. Differential regulation of estrogen receptor (ER)alpha and ERbeta in primate mammary gland. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shim, G.-J.; Wang, L.; Andersson, S.; Nagy, N.; Kis, L.L.; Zhang, Q.; Mäkelä, S.; Warner, M.; Gustafsson, J.-A. Disruption of the estrogen receptor beta gene in mice causes myeloproliferative disease resembling chronic myeloid leukemia with lymphoid blast crisis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6694–6699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Jia, M.; Gustafsson, J.Å. Estrogen receptor alpha and beta in health and disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 29, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nassa, G.; Tarallo, R.; Guzzi, P.H.; Ferraro, L.; Cirillo, F.; Ravo, M.; Nola, E.; Baumann, M.; Weisz, A. Comparative analysis of nuclear estrogen receptor alpha and beta interactomes in breast cancer cells. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chang, E.C.; Charn, T.H.; Park, S.; Helferich, W.G.; Komm, B.; Katzenellenbogen, J.A.; Katzenellenbogen, B.S. Estrogen receptors α and β as determinants of gene expression: Influence of ligand, dose, and chromatin binding. Mol. Endocrinol. 2008, 22, 1032–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Forsythe, A.; Breland, T.; Majumdar, S.; Elkin, T.D.; Johnson, D.; Megason, G. Gender differences in incidence rates of childhood B-precursor acute lymphocytic leukemia in Mississippi. J. Pediatr. Oncol. Nurs. 2010, 27, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Morton, L.M.; Wang, S.S.; Devesa, S.S.; Hartge, P.; Weisenburger, D.D.; Linet, M.S. Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992-2001. Blood 2006, 107, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Qiu, X.; Yuan, X.; Jin, X.; He, X.; Zhu, L.; Zhao, X. Oestrogen-deficiency inducing haematopoiesis dysfunction via reduction in haematopoietic stem cells and haematopoietic growth factors in rats. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2012, 93, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nakada, D.; Oguro, H.; Levi, B.P.; Ryan, N.; Kitano, A.; Saitoh, Y.; Takeichi, M.; Wendt, G.R.; Morrison, S.J. Oestrogen increases haematopoietic stem-cell self-renewal in females and during pregnancy. Nature 2014, 505, 555–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Illing, A.; Liu, P.; Ostermay, S.; Schilling, A.; De Haan, G.; Krust, A.; Amling, M.; Chambon, P.; Schinke, T.; Tuckermann, J.P. Estradiol increases hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells independent of its actions on bone. Haematologica 2012, 97, 1131–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Edling, C.E.; Hallberg, B. c-Kit—A hematopoietic cell essential receptor tyrosine kinase. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39, 1995–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wilson, A.; Murphy, M.J.; Oskarsson, T.; Kaloulis, K.; Bettess, M.D.; Oser, G.M.; Pasche, A.-C.; Knabenhans, C.; Macdonald, H.R.; Trumpp, A. c-Myc controls the balance between hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2747–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shin, J.Y.; Hu, W.; Naramura, M.; Park, C.Y. High c-Kit expression identifies hematopoietic stem cells with impaired self-renewal and megakaryocytic bias. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sánchez-Aguilera, A.; Arranz, L.; Martín-Pérez, D.; García-García, A.; Stavropoulou, V.; Kubovcakova, L.; Isern, J.; Martín-Salamanca, S.; Langa, X.; Skoda, R.C.; et al. Estrogen signaling selectively induces apoptosis of hematopoietic progenitors and myeloid neoplasms without harming steady-state hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15, 791–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gavali, S.; Gupta, M.K.; Daswani, B.; Wani, M.R.; Sirdeshmukh, R.; Khatkhatay, M.I. Estrogen enhances human osteoblast survival and function via promotion of autophagy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Cell Res. 2019, 1866, 1498–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, H.R.; Lee, J.H.; Heo, H.R.; Yang, S.R.; Ha, K.S.; Park, W.S. Improved hematopoietic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells via estrogen receptor signaling pathway. Cell Biosci. 2016, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Phiel, K.L.; Henderson, R.A.; Adelman, S.J.; Elloso, M.M. Differential estrogen receptor gene expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell populations. Immunol. Lett. 2005, 97, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Laffont, S.; Rouquié, N.; Azar, P.; Seillet, C.; Plumas, J.; Aspord, C.; Guéry, J.-C. X-chromosome complement and estrogen receptor signaling independently contribute to the enhanced TLR7-mediated IFN-α production of plasmacytoid dendritic cells from women. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 5444–5452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Vona, R.; Gambardella, L.; Ortona, E.; Santulli, M.; Malorni, W.; Carè, A.; Pietraforte, D.; Straface, E. Functional Estrogen Receptors of Red Blood Cells. Do They Influence Intracellular Signaling? Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Int. J. Exp. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 53, 186–199. [Google Scholar]
  35. Seillet, C.; Rouquié, N.; Foulon, E.; Douin-Echinard, V.; Krust, A.; Chambon, P.; Arnal, J.-F.; Guéry, J.-C.; Laffont, S. Estradiol promotes functional responses in inflammatory and steady-state dendritic cells through differential requirement for activation function-1 of estrogen receptor α. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 5459–5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Carreras, E.; Turner, S.; Frank, M.B.; Knowlton, N.; Osban, J.; Centola, M.; Park, C.G.; Simmons, A.; Alberola-Ila, J.; Kovats, S. Estrogen receptor signaling promotes dendritic cell differentiation by increasing expression of the transcription factor IRF4. Blood 2010, 115, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Blobel, G.A.; Orkin, S.H. Estrogen-induced apoptosis by inhibition of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 1687–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Du, C.; Xu, Y.; Yang, K.; Chen, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Shen, M.; Chen, F.; Chen, M.; et al. Estrogen promotes megakaryocyte polyploidization via estrogen receptor beta-mediated transcription of GATA1. Leukemia 2017, 31, 945–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Larocca, L.M.; Piantelli, M.; Leone, G.; Sica, S.; Teofili, L.; Panici, P.B.; Scambia, G.; Mancuso, S.; Capelli, A.; Ranelletti, F.O. Type II oestrogen binding sites in acute lymphoid and myeloid leukaemias: Growth inhibitory effect of oestrogen and flavonoids. Br. J. Haematol. 1990, 75, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rota, S.G.; Roma, A.; Dude, I.; Ma, C.; Stevens, R.; MacEachern, J.; Graczyk, J.; Espiritu, S.M.G.; Rao, P.N.; Minden, M.D.; et al. Estrogen receptorbeta is a novel target in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017, 16, 2618–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Issa, J.; Zehnbauer, A.; Civin, I.; Sharkis, S.J.; Davidson, E.; Kaufmann, S.H.; Baylin, S.B. The Estrogen Receptor CpG Island Is Methylated in Most Hematopoietic Neoplasms. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 973–977. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Li, Q.; Kopecky, K.J.; Mohan, A.; Willman, C.L.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Weick, J.K.; Issa, J.J. Estrogen Receptor Methylation Is Associated with Improved Survival in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Siraj, A.K.; Ekmekci, C.G.; Gutie, M.I.; Ozbek, U.; Bhatia, K. Aberrant Methylation of Multiple Tumor Suppressor Genes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Am. J. Hematol. 2004, 240, 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  44. Agrawal, S.; Unterberg, M.; Koschmieder, S.; Stadt, U.; Brunnberg, U.; Verbeek, W.; Bu, T.; Berdel, W.E. DNA Methylation of Tumor Suppressor Genes in Clinical Remission Predicts the Relapse Risk in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 1370–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Griffiths, E.A.; Gore, S.D.; Hooker, C.M.; Mohammad, H.P.; Mcdevitt, M.A.; Smith, B.D.; Karp, J.E.; Herman, J.G.; Carraway, H.E. Epigenetic differences in cytogenetically normal versus abnormal acute myeloid leukemia. Epigenetics 2010, 5, 1559–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hiller, J.K.; Schmoor, C.; Gaidzik, V.I.; Schmidt-salzmann, C.; Yalcin, A.; Abdelkarim, M.; Blagitko-dorfs, N.; Döhner, K.; Bullinger, L.; Duyster, J.; et al. Evaluating the impact of genetic and epigenetic aberrations on survival and response in acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving epigenetic therapy. Ann. Hematol. 2017, 96, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hess, C.J.; Errami, A.; Berkhof, J.; Denkers, F.; Ossenkoppele, G.J.; Nygren, A.O.H.; Schuurhuis, G.J.; Waisfisz, Q. Concurrent methylation of promoters from tumor associated genes predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma 2008, 49, 1132–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Parl, F.F.; Crooke, P.S.; Plummer, W.D.; Dupont, W.D. Genomic-epidemiologic evidence that estrogens promote breast cancer development. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomarkers 2018, 27, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Lv, N.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, L. Predictors of clinical responses to hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann. Hematol. 2018, 97, 2025–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mcpherson, S.J.; Hussain, S.; Balanathan, P.; Hedwards, S.L.; Niranjan, B.; Grant, M.; Chandrasiri, U.P.; Toivanen, R.; Wang, Y.; Taylor, R.A.; et al. Estrogen receptor–β activated apoptosis in benign hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate is androgen independent and TNFα mediated. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 107, 3123–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Treeck, O.; Diepolder, E.; Skrzypczak, M.; Schüler-Toprak, S.; Ortmann, O. Knockdown of estrogen receptor β increases proliferation and affects the transcriptome of endometrial adenocarcinoma cells. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yakimchuk, K.; Iravani, M.; Hasni, M.S.; Rho, P. Effect of ligand-activated estrogen receptor β on lymphoma growth in vitro and in vivo. Leukemia 2011, 25, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Valk, P.J.M.; Verhaak, R.G.W.; Beijen, M.A.; Erpelinck, C.A.; Doorn-Khosrovani, S.B.V.W.V.; Boer, J.M.; Beverloo, H.B.; Moorhouse, M.J.; Van Der Spek, P.J.; Löwenberg, B.; et al. Prognostically useful gene-expression profiles in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1617–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Klein, H.-U.; Ruckert, C.; Kohlmann, A.; Bullinger, L.; Thiede, C.; Haferlach, T.; Dugas, M. Quantitative comparison of microarray experiments with published leukemia related gene expression signatures. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Motylewska, E.; Stasikowska, O.; Mełeń-Mucha, G. The inhibitory effect of diarylpropionitrile, a selective agonist of estrogen receptor beta, on the growth of MC38 colon cancer line. Cancer Lett. 2009, 276, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sareddy, G.R.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Viswanadhapalli, S.; Garcia, L.; Gruslova, A.; Cavazos, D.; Garcia, M.; Strom, A.M.; Gustafsson, J.-A.; et al. Selective Estrogen Receptor β Agonist LY500307 as a Novel Therapeutic Agent for Glioblastoma. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, J.; Viswanadhapalli, S.; Garcia, L.; Zhou, M.; Nair, B.C.; Kost, E.; Rao Tekmal, R.; Li, R.; Rao, M.K.; Curiel, T.; et al. Therapeutic utility of natural estrogen receptor beta agonists on ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 50002–50014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zhao, L.; Huang, S.; Mei, S.; Yang, Z.; Xu, L.; Zhou, N.; Yang, Q.; Shen, Q.; Wang, W.; Le, X.; et al. Pharmacological activation of estrogen receptor beta augments innate immunity to suppress cancer metastasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E3673–E3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Principi, M.; De Tullio, N.; Scavo, M.P.; Piscitelli, D.; Marzullo, A.; Russo, S.; Albano, F.; Lofano, K.; Papagni, S.; Barone, M.; et al. Estrogen receptors expression in long-lasting ulcerative pancolitis with and without dysplasia: A preliminary report. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 47, 1253–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Principi, M.; Scavo, M.P.; Piscitelli, D.; Villanacci, V.; Lovero, R.; Losurdo, G.; Girardi, B.; Ierardi, E.; Di Leo, A. The sharp decline of beta estrogen receptors expression in long-lasting ulcerative-associated carcinoma. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 50, 1002–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Qiu, Y.; Waters, C.E.; Lewis, A.E.; Langman, M.J.S.; Eggo, M.C. Oestrogen-induced apoptosis in colonocytes expressing oestrogen receptor beta. J. Endocrinol. 2002, 174, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hsu, H.-H.; Cheng, S.-F.; Wu, C.-C.; Chu, C.-H.; Weng, Y.-J.; Lin, C.-S.; Lee, S.-D.; Wu, H.-C.; Huang, C.-Y.; Kuo, W.-W. Apoptotic effects of over-expressed estrogen receptor-beta on LoVo colon cancer cell is mediated by p53 signalings in a ligand-dependent manner. Chin. J. Physiol. 2006, 49, 110–116. [Google Scholar]
  63. Edvardsson, K.; Ström, A.; Jonsson, P.; Gustafsson, J.-Å.; Williams, C. Estrogen receptor β induces antiinflammatory and antitumorigenic networks in colon cancer cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2011, 25, 969–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Mak, P.; Li, J.; Samanta, S.; Mercurio, A.M. ERβ regulation of NF-kB activation in prostate cancer is mediated by HIF-1. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 40247–40254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Kontos, S.; Kominea, A.; Melachrinou, M.; Balampani, E.; Sotiropoulou-Bonikou, G. Inverse expression of estrogen receptor-beta and nuclear factor-kappaB in urinary bladder carcinogenesis. Int. J. Urol. 2010, 17, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Delgado, M.D.; Albajar, M.; Gomez-Casares, M.T.; Batlle, A.; León, J. MYC oncogene in myeloid neoplasias. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2013, 15, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Guzman, M.L.; Neering, S.J.; Upchurch, D.; Grimes, B.; Howard, D.S.; Rizzieri, D.A.; Luger, S.M.; Jordan, C.T. Nuclear factor-kB is constitutively activated in primitive human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Blood 2015, 98, 2301–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kushner, P.J.; Agard, D.A.; Greene, G.L.; Scanlan, T.S.; Shiau, A.K.; Uht, R.M.; Webb, P. Estrogen receptor pathways to AP-1. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000, 74, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huang, B.; Warner, M.; Gustafsson, J.-Å. Estrogen receptors in breast carcinogenesis and endocrine therapy. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 418, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sánchez-Aguilera, A.; Méndez-Ferrer, S. Regulation of hematopoietic progenitors by estrogens as a basis for new antileukemic strategies. Mol. Cell. Oncol. 2015, 3556, e1009728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Škrtić, M.; Sriskanthadevan, S.; Jhas, B.; Gebbia, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Hurren, R.; Jitkova, Y.; Gronda, M.; Maclean, N. Inhibition of mitochondrial translation as a therapeutic strategy for human acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2011, 20, 674–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Sriskanthadevan, S.; Jeyaraju, D.V.; Chung, T.E.; Prabha, S.; Xu, W.; Skrtic, M.; Jhas, B.; Hurren, R.; Gronda, M.; Wang, X.; et al. AML cells have low spare reserve capacity in their respiratory chain that renders them susceptible to oxidative metabolic stress. Blood 2015, 125, 2120–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Morad, S.A.F.; Ryan, T.E.; Neufer, P.D.; Zeczycki, T.N.; Davis, T.S.; Macdougall, M.R.; Fox, T.E.; Tan, S.; Feith, D.J.; Loughran, T.P.; et al. Ceramide-tamoxifen regimen targets bioenergetic elements in acute myelogenous leukemia. J. Lipid Res. 2016, 57, 1231–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Cabot, M.C.; Giuliano, A.E.; Volner, A.; Han, T.Y. Tamoxifen retards glycosphingolipid metabolism in human cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 1996, 394, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Adachi, K.; Honma, Y.; Miyake, T.; Kawakami, K.; Takahashi, T.; Suzumiya, J. Tamoxifen enhances the differentiation-inducing and growth-inhibitory effects of all-trans retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 48, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Kauss, M.A.; Reiterer, G.; Bunaciu, R.P.; Yen, A. Human myeloblastic leukemia cells (HL-60) express a membrane receptor for estrogen that signals and modulates retinoic. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 2999–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Roma, A.; Rota, S.G.; Spagnuolo, P.A. Diosmetin Induces Apoptosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Raynal, N.J.; Momparler, L.; Charbonneau, M.; Momparler, R.L. Antileukemic Activity of Genistein, a Major Isoflavone Present in Soy Products. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 60, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Narasimhan, K.; Lee, Y.M.; Lim, T.K.; Port, S.A.; Han, J.; Chen, C.; Lin, Q. Genistein exerts anti-leukemic effects on genetically different acute myeloid leukemia cell lines by inhibiting protein synthesis and cell proliferation while inducing apoptosis—Molecular insights from an iTRAQTM quantitative proteomics study. Oncoscience 2015, 2, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Peng, Y.H.S.; Liao, K.L.C.; Lin, C.; Tsai, M.L.K.L.C. Genistein induces apoptosis in vitro and has antitumor activity against human leukemia HL-60 cancer cell xenograft growth in vivo. Environ. Toxicol. 2019, 34, 443–456. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hasan, M.; Kumolosasi, E.; Jasamai, M.; Jamal, J.A.; Azmi, N.; Rajab, N.F. Evaluation of phytoestrogens in inducing cell death mediated by decreasing Annexin A1 in Annexin A1-knockdown leukemia cells. Daru 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. De Blas, E.; Estañ, M.C.; Gómez, C.; Ramos, J.; Boyano, C.; Aller, P. Selected polyphenols potentiate the apoptotic efficacy of glycolytic inhibitors in human acute myeloid leukemia cell lines. Regulation by protein kinase activities. Cancer Cell Int. 2016, 16, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. LaRocca, L.M.; Teofili, L.; Leone, G.; Sica, S.; Pierelli, L.; Menichella, G.; Scambia, G.; Panici, P.B.; Ricci, R.; Piantelli, M.; et al. Antiproliferative activity of quercetin on normal bone marrow and leukaemic progenitors. Br. J. Haematol. 1991, 79, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Larocca, L.M.; Teofili, L.; Maggiano, N.; Piantelli, M.; Ranelletti, F.O.; Leone, G. Quercetin and the Growth of Leukemic Progenitors Quercetin and the Growth of Leukemic Progenitors. Leuk. Lymphoma 1996, 23, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lee, W.J.; Hsiao, M.; Chang, J.L.; Yang, S.F.; Tseng, T.H.; Cheng, C.W.; Chow, J.M.; Lin, K.H.; Lin, Y.W.; Liu, C.C.; et al. Quercetin induces mitochondrial-derived apoptosis via reactive oxygen species-mediated ERK activation in HL-60 leukemia cells and xenograft. Arch. Toxicol. 2015, 89, 1103–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Alvarez, M.C.; Maso, V.; Torello, C.O.; Ferro, K.P.; Teresinha, S.; Saad, O. The polyphenol quercetin induces cell death in leukemia by targeting epigenetic regulators of pro-apoptotic genes. Clin. Epigenetics 2018, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Naimi, A.; Entezari, A.; Hagh, M.F.; Hassanzadeh, A.; Saraei, R.; Solali, S. Quercetin sensitizes human myeloid leukemia KG-1 cells against TRAIL-induced apoptosis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 13233–13241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yoshikawa, M.; Uemura, T.; Shimoda, H.; Kishi, A.; Kawahara, Y.; Matsuda, H. Medicinal Foodstuffs. XVIII. Phytoestrogens from the Aerial Part of Petroselinum crispum MILL. (PARSLEY) and Structures of Acetylapiin and a New Monoterpene Glycoside, Petroside. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 1039–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Mor, G.; Sapi, E.; Abrahams, V.M.; Rutherford, T.; Song, J.; Hao, X.Y.; Muzaffar, S.; Kohen, F. Interaction of the Estrogen Receptors with the Fas Ligand Promoter in Human Monocytes. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jaiswal, N.; Akhtar, J.; Singh, S.P.; Ahsan, F.; Res, D. An Overview on Genistein and its Various Formulations Chemistry of Genistein Biological Properties of Genistein Genistein plays a vital role in a number of biological reactions and. Drug Res. 2019, 69, 305–313. [Google Scholar]
  91. Yan, L.; Spitznagel, E.L. Soy consumption and prostate cancer risk in men: A revisit of a meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1155–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chen, M.; Rao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wei, S.; Li, Y.; Guo, T.; Yin, P. Association between soy isoflavone intake and breast cancer risk for pre-and post-menopausal women: A meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.M.; Song, D.F.; Cui, H.B. Effect of apoptosis in human breast cancer cells and its probable mechanisms by genistein. J. Hyg. Res. 2005, 34, 67–69. [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhou, D.; Chen, H. Genistein, a soya isoflavone, prevents azoxymethane-induced up-regulation of WNT/β-catenin signalling and reduces colon pre-neoplasia in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Peng, B.; Cao, J.; Yi, S.; Wang, C.; Zheng, G.; He, Z. Inhibition of proliferation and induction of G1-phase cell-cycle arrest by dFMGEN, a novel genistein derivative, in lung carcinoma A549 cells. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 36, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gu, Y.; Zhu, C.-F.; Iwamoto, H.; Chen, J.-S. Genistein inhibits invasive potential of human hepatocellular carcinoma by altering cell cycle, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG 2005, 11, 6512–6517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tatsuta, M.; Iishi, H.; Baba, M.; Yano, H.; Uehara, H.; Nakaizumi, A. Attenuation by genistein of sodium-chloride-enhanced gastric carcinogenesis induced by N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in Wistar rats. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 80, 396–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Spagnuolo, C.; Russo, G.L.; Orhan, I.E.; Habtemariam, S.; Daglia, M.; Sureda, A.; Nabavi, S.F.; Devi, K.P.; Loizzo, M.R.; Tundis, R.; et al. Genistein and cancer: Current status, challenges, and future directions. Am. Soc. Nutr. 2015, 6, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Andres, S.; Pevny, S.; Ziegenhagen, R.; Bakhiya, N.; Schäfer, B.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Lampen, A. Safety aspects of the use of quercetin as a dietary supplement. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 1700447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Covaleda, A.M.S.; Ratman, D.; van der Saag, P.; Ström, A.; Gustafsson, J.A.; Vervoort, J.J.M. Phytoestrogen-mediated inhibition of proliferation of the human T47D breast cancer cells depends on the ER/ER ratio. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 112, 171–178. [Google Scholar]
  101. Maggiolini, M.; Bonofiglio, D.; Marsico, S.; Panno, M.L.; Cenni, B.; Picard, D.; Andò, S. Estrogen receptor α mediates the proliferative but not the cytotoxic dose-dependent effects of two major phytoestrogens on human breast cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2001, 60, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Rauf, A.; Imran, M.; Khan, I.A.; ur-Rehman, M.; Gilani, S.A.; Mehmood, Z.; Mubarak, M.S. Anticancer potential of quercetin: A comprehensive review. Phyther. Res. 2018, 32, 2109–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kuiper, G.G.; Lemmen, J.G.; Carlsson, B.; Corton, J.C.; Safe, S.H.; van der Saag, P.T.; van der Burg, B.; Gustafsson, J.A. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology 1998, 139, 4252–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lagadinou, E.D.; Sach, A.; Callahan, K.; Rossi, R.M.; Neering, S.J.; Minhajuddin, M.; Ashton, J.M.; Pei, S.; Grose, V.; O’Dwyer, K.M. BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Farge, T.; Saland, E.; de Toni, F.; Aroua, N.; Hosseini, M.; Perry, R.; Bosc, C.; Sugita, M.; Stuani, L.; Fraisse, M.; et al. Chemotherapy-Resistant Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Are Not Enriched for Leukemic Stem Cells but Require Oxidative Metabolism. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 716–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Konopleva, M.; Letai, A. BCL-2 inhibition in AML: An unexpected bonus? Blood 2018, 132, 1007–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cancers 12 00907 g001 550
Figure 1. The role of estrogen receptors in hematopoiesis and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In hematopoiesis, the activation of ERα by estradiol or tamoxifen increased proliferation and decreased self-renewal of primitive long-term hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSC). The upregulation of c-myc and downregulation of c-kit upon ERα activation contributes to this phenotype. Multipotent progenitors (MPP) undergo apoptosis while ERα-mediated activation of IRF4 encourages dendritic cell differentiation. Additionally, ERα-mediated inhibition of GATA1 increases erythropoiesis while the ERβ-mediated activation of GATA1 results in increased megakaryocyte polyploidization to produce platelets. In malignancy, lymphoid-related cancers predominantly express the ERβ subtype and its activation inhibits tumor growth. The knockdown of ESR2, the gene encoding ERβ, leads to a myeloproliferative disease in mice resembling chronic myeloid leukemia. The possible origins of this disease are unknown and thus symbolized by dashed arrows. In AML, the DNA hypermethylation of ESR1 is prominent among patients and results in decreased transcription of ERα. ERα hypermethylation often co-occurs with the methylation of other tumor suppressor genes, which also influences patient prognosis and the response to hypomethylating agents. A subset of AML patients also express increased ERβ compared to ERα, and it has been shown that this subset would best be targeted by an ERβ agonist.
Figure 1. The role of estrogen receptors in hematopoiesis and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In hematopoiesis, the activation of ERα by estradiol or tamoxifen increased proliferation and decreased self-renewal of primitive long-term hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSC). The upregulation of c-myc and downregulation of c-kit upon ERα activation contributes to this phenotype. Multipotent progenitors (MPP) undergo apoptosis while ERα-mediated activation of IRF4 encourages dendritic cell differentiation. Additionally, ERα-mediated inhibition of GATA1 increases erythropoiesis while the ERβ-mediated activation of GATA1 results in increased megakaryocyte polyploidization to produce platelets. In malignancy, lymphoid-related cancers predominantly express the ERβ subtype and its activation inhibits tumor growth. The knockdown of ESR2, the gene encoding ERβ, leads to a myeloproliferative disease in mice resembling chronic myeloid leukemia. The possible origins of this disease are unknown and thus symbolized by dashed arrows. In AML, the DNA hypermethylation of ESR1 is prominent among patients and results in decreased transcription of ERα. ERα hypermethylation often co-occurs with the methylation of other tumor suppressor genes, which also influences patient prognosis and the response to hypomethylating agents. A subset of AML patients also express increased ERβ compared to ERα, and it has been shown that this subset would best be targeted by an ERβ agonist.
Cancers 12 00907 g001
Table
Table 1. AML and Specific Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs).
Table 1. AML and Specific Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs).
AgentModel(s)Summary of Results and Underlying MechanismsReference
Cancers 12 00907 i001
Tamoxifen		In vivo: MLL-AF9+ induced AMLEnhanced doxycycline-induced apoptosis, which was preceded by a decrease in mitochondrial respiration and spare reserve capacity.[29]
In vitro: HL-60, KG-1 cells, primary AML cellsIn synergy with C6-ceraminde, inhibited complex I respiration and induced apoptosis in AML.[73]
In vitro: HL-60 cells, primary APL cellsEnhanced ATRA-induced differentiation of APL cells.[75]
Cancers 12 00907 i002
Diosmetin		In vitro: TEX, primary AML cells
In vivo: Intravenous engraftment of primary AML cells		Reduced the leukemia burden in vitro and in vivo through the targeting of ERβ. High ERβ:ERα ratios were necessary for diosmetin-induced activity.[40]
In vitro: TEX, primary AML cells
In vivo: Subcutaneous xenograft of TEX cells		ERβ activation by diosmetin increased intracellular TNFα, which activated the extrinsic apoptosis pathway. TNFα increases are lost when ERβ is not expressed. Apoptosis is abrogated by a TNFα-neutralizing antibody. [77]
Cancers 12 00907 i003
Genistein		In vitro: HL-60, MOLT-2, KG1a, Raji cells
In vivo: Intravenous engraftment of murine L1210 cells		Inhibited the growth and clonogenicity of myeloid and lymphoid leukemic cell lines, and a genistein-rich diet improved the survival of leukemia bearing mice. It also caused the re-expression of the silenced tumor suppressor genes, p57KIP2 and p15CDKN2B.[78]
In vitro: HL-60, MV4-11Induced caspase-dependent apoptosis of leukemia cell lines and decreased protein synthesis through the inhibition of mTOR. It also inhibited FLT3.[79]
In vitro: HL-60 cells
In vitro: Subcutaneous xenograft of HL-60 cells		Induced G2/M cell cycle arrest and activated intrinsic and calpain-mediated apoptosis. It also reduced the HL-60 tumor burden. [80]
In vitro: U937, Jurkat, K562 cellsCaused G2/M cell cycle arrest and reduced expression of ANXA1, leading to intrinsic apoptosis via caspase 9 activation.[81]
In vitro: HL-60, THP-1, NB4 cellsSensitized AML cells to 2-DG and lonidamine cytotoxicity by inhibiting compensatory Akt and ERK activation, enhancing apoptosis.[82]
Cancers 12 00907 i004
Quercetin		In vitro: Primary AML and ALL cellsPrimary AML samples expressed a type II estrogen receptor binding receptor for which quercetin had affinity. Quercetin reduced leukemic blast proliferation and inhibited the clonogenic growth of primary AML samples but not CD34+ normal bone-marrow derived cells.[39,83,84]
In vivo: HL-60, THP-1, MV4-11, and U937 cell
In vivo: Subcutaneous xenograft of HL-60 cells		Caused the ROS-mediated activation of ERK and caspase-mediated apoptosis. It delayed tumor growth in vivo in an ROS-dependent manner, as growth inhibitory effects were lost when mice were co-treated with N-acetylcysteine.[85]
In vitro: HL-60, U937 cells
In vivo: Subcutaneous xenograft of HL-60 and U937 cells		Abrogated DNMT1 and DNMT3a expression and increased the proteasome degradation of class I HDACs in cell lines and xenograft tumors. It increased the apoptosis of leukemic cell lines by inducing demethylation and the transcriptional activation of pro-apoptotic proteins.[86]
In vitro: KG-1 cellsImproved the efficacy of TRAIL in apoptosis induction by upregulating the expression of DR4 and DR5 and downregulating several antiapoptotic proteins like XIAP, c-IAP1 and c-IAP2.[87]
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; ATRA, all-trans retinoic acid; ERβ, estrogen receptor beta; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; FLT3, fms like tyrosine kinase 3; ANXA1, Annexin A1; 2-DG, 2-deoxy-D-glucose; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; DNMT, DNA methyltransferase; HDAC, histone deacetylase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TRAIL, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; DR, death receptor; XIAP, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein; c-IAP, cellular inhibitor of apoptosis.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roma, A.; Spagnuolo, P.A. Estrogen Receptors Alpha and Beta in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers 2020, 12, 907. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers12040907

AMA Style

Roma A, Spagnuolo PA. Estrogen Receptors Alpha and Beta in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers. 2020; 12(4):907. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers12040907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roma, Alessia, and Paul A. Spagnuolo. 2020. "Estrogen Receptors Alpha and Beta in Acute Myeloid Leukemia" Cancers 12, no. 4: 907. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers12040907

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop